Backlash to Trump racist post signals limits to his political immunity

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Gegenreaktionen auf Trumps rassistischen Beitrag zeigen Grenzen seiner politischen Immunität
Credit: Reuters

President Donald Trump has long seemed impervious to the ordinary rules of democratic politics. He once bragged he could

“stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody”

without losing voter support, a comment emblematic of his sense of his political invincibility. These many years later, he has repeatedly breached political, legal, and ethical norms with limited consequences, establishing an image of himself as a leader untouchable by scandal.

Yet, every now and then, Trump finds a line that even his political armor cannot entirely ward him against. His latest decision to remove a racist video clip featuring the Obamas as apes constitutes just that sort of event—an unusually public capitulation for a figure defined by nonconformity.

Why Did This Controversy Force a Rare Retreat?

This is clear in the White House’s chaotic reaction to the video. It demonstrated an administration that was ill-prepared for the depth of anger that the video elicited from Democrats and Republicans alike. Trump’s standard modus operandi of sardonically taking criticism, doubling down, and then moving on did nothing to stem the rising tide of anger. By not apologizing nor admitting to making the wrong call, the decision to remove the video was an unusual acknowledgement that political costs still exist.

“It is surprising, in itself, to ever see him take a step back,”

said Jeff Shesol, a historian and former Clinton speechwriter. “It feels significant.”

The episode exposed the limits of Trump’s political armor and suggested that overt racial provocation still carries tangible risks.

Is Trump Still the Unquestioned Leader of the Republican Party?

Despite the controversy, however, Trump still enjoys significant backing from the Republican Party. His administration continues pointing out foreign policy successes as well as achievements in the field of security as evidence of the viability of Trump’s approach. Increased military expenditure in Europe and interventions in foreign conflicts, such as the release of hostages in Israel, are cited as some of this administration’s achievements.

“President Trump is the unequivocal leader of the Republican Party,”

said White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, framing Democrats as existential threats to the nation.

Yet the controversy underscores a growing tension between Trump’s dominance and the party’s long-term political viability.

How Has Trump Survived Scandals That Would Destroy Other Politicians?

Trump’s durability is unmatched in modern American politics. He persists in lying about winning the 2020 election, survived a criminal conviction, and even went so far as to try to put his name on a major infrastructure project even in the face of cancellation.

Such behavior would have ensured the end of most politicians’ careers. For Trump, it has become the norm. But as the US heads towards the midterm elections, even Trump has been forced to temper his rhetoric at times.

Did Bipartisan Backlash Force the White House to Act?

The reaction against the racist video was immediate and bipartisan, including comments from Senator Tim Scott, the only black Republican in the Senate and an ally of Donald Trump, who referred to the video as

“the most racist thing I’ve seen out of this White House.”

In the face of anger from within his own party, the administration moved with urgency to make the best of the situation. The post was promptly deleted, and the staff member responsible was identified and held responsible. Trump was unaware of the content of the clip and was quick to comment about its negatives, but he did not apologize. His unwillingness to take responsibility again points to his tendency to retreat without accountability.

Is This Part of a Broader Pattern of Tactical Backtracking?

Trump has recently softened positions on violent crackdowns, territorial threats, and economic rhetoric after public and political pressure. These partial reversals suggest that public opinion and electoral realities still exert influence. However, his retreats are often temporary. History shows Trump frequently reverts to hardline positions once the immediate pressure subsides.

Is Trump Losing Ground on Key Political Issues?

The polling and the political strategists say Trump’s immigration and economic platform—traditionally strong for Republicans—is chipping away support, in particular, among minority voters.

“He’s losing that. He’s now going to burn those gains to the ground,”

said Republican strategist Barrett Marson, referring to outreach to Black and Hispanic communities.

The controversy risks reinforcing perceptions that Trump’s rhetoric undermines the party’s demographic expansion efforts.

Can Trump Learn from Political Mistakes He Refuses to Admit?

Trump’s refusal to apologize or accept responsibility suggests an inability—or unwillingness—to learn from political missteps. According to Marson, this makes repeat controversies almost inevitable.

“He can’t admit a mistake, and therefore he cannot learn from the mistake,”

he said.

This pattern raises fundamental questions about leadership accountability and institutional norms under Trump’s presidency.

Will Political Gravity Eventually Catch Up to Trump?

Trump’s career has been a testament to remarkable political resiliency, but to critics, no political leader is immune to political gravity. Former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie harked: “Even the strongest of political figures, eventually, the footing begins to slip.

And that comports with history, including Trump’s history. After neo-Nazis caused chaos and murder in Charlottesville, he said a few words denouncing white nationalists—only under pressure—before reverting the following day to a more comfortable stance of blaming “both sides.”

The racist video controversy suggests that while Trump may be politically durable, his immunity is not absolute. The question is not whether he will face limits, but how often—and how costly—they will be.

Research Staff

Research Staff

Sign up for our Newsletter