Menu
Menu
U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth recently visited Panama and signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to strengthen military cooperation and support for the Panama Canal security. Through training, rotating U.S. troop deployments, and collaboration to counter Chinese influence in the area, this pact seeks to enhance cooperative security operations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
China's increasing influence in Panama, particularly through the Belt and Road Initiative and CK Hutchison's port activities, was seen as a strategic danger by the Trump administration. To offset China's influence, the U.S. responded by promoting American investments, closely examining concessions held by China, and pursuing diplomatic initiatives. In order to improve bilateral relations and allay worries about China's involvement in the canal's operations, Secretary of State Marco Rubio held discussions with Panama.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Panama turns to U.S. lobbyists to deal with Trump\u2019s canal threats","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"panama-turns-to-u-s-lobbyists-to-deal-with-trumps-canal-threats","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7878","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":8},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
Trump's rhetoric escalated with threats to demand the return of the canal to U.S. control if Panama did not treat American shippers fairly, referencing the 1977 treaty that transferred control to Panama in 1999. He suggested that if the treaty's principles were not respected, the U.S. would reclaim the canal \"quickly and without question,\" a stance firmly rejected by Panama's president, who emphasized Panama's sovereign control over the canal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth recently visited Panama and signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to strengthen military cooperation and support for the Panama Canal security. Through training, rotating U.S. troop deployments, and collaboration to counter Chinese influence in the area, this pact seeks to enhance cooperative security operations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
China's increasing influence in Panama, particularly through the Belt and Road Initiative and CK Hutchison's port activities, was seen as a strategic danger by the Trump administration. To offset China's influence, the U.S. responded by promoting American investments, closely examining concessions held by China, and pursuing diplomatic initiatives. In order to improve bilateral relations and allay worries about China's involvement in the canal's operations, Secretary of State Marco Rubio held discussions with Panama.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Panama turns to U.S. lobbyists to deal with Trump\u2019s canal threats","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"panama-turns-to-u-s-lobbyists-to-deal-with-trumps-canal-threats","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7878","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":8},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
President Donald Trump has frequently denounced what he considers to be undue Chinese influence over the Panama Canal, focusing in particular on the<\/a> Hong Kong-based corporation CK Hutchison Holdings' control of the ports of Balboa and Cristobal. Asserting that the canal was first constructed by the United States and that \"we didn\u2019t give it to China, we gave it to Panama, and we\u2019re taking it back,\" Trump asserted in his inaugural speech that \"China is operating the Panama Canal\" and that the United States would \"take it back.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n Trump's rhetoric escalated with threats to demand the return of the canal to U.S. control if Panama did not treat American shippers fairly, referencing the 1977 treaty that transferred control to Panama in 1999. He suggested that if the treaty's principles were not respected, the U.S. would reclaim the canal \"quickly and without question,\" a stance firmly rejected by Panama's president, who emphasized Panama's sovereign control over the canal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth recently visited Panama and signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to strengthen military cooperation and support for the Panama Canal security. Through training, rotating U.S. troop deployments, and collaboration to counter Chinese influence in the area, this pact seeks to enhance cooperative security operations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n China's increasing influence in Panama, particularly through the Belt and Road Initiative and CK Hutchison's port activities, was seen as a strategic danger by the Trump administration. To offset China's influence, the U.S. responded by promoting American investments, closely examining concessions held by China, and pursuing diplomatic initiatives. In order to improve bilateral relations and allay worries about China's involvement in the canal's operations, Secretary of State Marco Rubio held discussions with Panama.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Panama turns to U.S. lobbyists to deal with Trump\u2019s canal threats","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"panama-turns-to-u-s-lobbyists-to-deal-with-trumps-canal-threats","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7878","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":8},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
The AMP is run by Checkmate managing partner Ches McDowell, who is reportedly close to Donald Trump Jr., along with partners Fritz Vaughan and Ryan O'Dwyer. Thanks to its connections to Trump, the lobbying tactic from North Carolina has lately spread to Washington.<\/p>\n\n\n\n President Donald Trump has frequently denounced what he considers to be undue Chinese influence over the Panama Canal, focusing in particular on the<\/a> Hong Kong-based corporation CK Hutchison Holdings' control of the ports of Balboa and Cristobal. Asserting that the canal was first constructed by the United States and that \"we didn\u2019t give it to China, we gave it to Panama, and we\u2019re taking it back,\" Trump asserted in his inaugural speech that \"China is operating the Panama Canal\" and that the United States would \"take it back.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n Trump's rhetoric escalated with threats to demand the return of the canal to U.S. control if Panama did not treat American shippers fairly, referencing the 1977 treaty that transferred control to Panama in 1999. He suggested that if the treaty's principles were not respected, the U.S. would reclaim the canal \"quickly and without question,\" a stance firmly rejected by Panama's president, who emphasized Panama's sovereign control over the canal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth recently visited Panama and signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to strengthen military cooperation and support for the Panama Canal security. Through training, rotating U.S. troop deployments, and collaboration to counter Chinese influence in the area, this pact seeks to enhance cooperative security operations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n China's increasing influence in Panama, particularly through the Belt and Road Initiative and CK Hutchison's port activities, was seen as a strategic danger by the Trump administration. To offset China's influence, the U.S. responded by promoting American investments, closely examining concessions held by China, and pursuing diplomatic initiatives. In order to improve bilateral relations and allay worries about China's involvement in the canal's operations, Secretary of State Marco Rubio held discussions with Panama.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Panama turns to U.S. lobbyists to deal with Trump\u2019s canal threats","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"panama-turns-to-u-s-lobbyists-to-deal-with-trumps-canal-threats","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7878","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":8},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
Reports state that the deal started in May and that the AMP would pay a cost of $195,000 each month for six months. Although the Panama Maritime Authority, which is in charge of managing Panama's vast maritime registry and ports, has previously engaged a number of US corporations for lobbying, this is the first time the Panamanian government has done so.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The AMP is run by Checkmate managing partner Ches McDowell, who is reportedly close to Donald Trump Jr., along with partners Fritz Vaughan and Ryan O'Dwyer. Thanks to its connections to Trump, the lobbying tactic from North Carolina has lately spread to Washington.<\/p>\n\n\n\n President Donald Trump has frequently denounced what he considers to be undue Chinese influence over the Panama Canal, focusing in particular on the<\/a> Hong Kong-based corporation CK Hutchison Holdings' control of the ports of Balboa and Cristobal. Asserting that the canal was first constructed by the United States and that \"we didn\u2019t give it to China, we gave it to Panama, and we\u2019re taking it back,\" Trump asserted in his inaugural speech that \"China is operating the Panama Canal\" and that the United States would \"take it back.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n Trump's rhetoric escalated with threats to demand the return of the canal to U.S. control if Panama did not treat American shippers fairly, referencing the 1977 treaty that transferred control to Panama in 1999. He suggested that if the treaty's principles were not respected, the U.S. would reclaim the canal \"quickly and without question,\" a stance firmly rejected by Panama's president, who emphasized Panama's sovereign control over the canal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth recently visited Panama and signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to strengthen military cooperation and support for the Panama Canal security. Through training, rotating U.S. troop deployments, and collaboration to counter Chinese influence in the area, this pact seeks to enhance cooperative security operations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n China's increasing influence in Panama, particularly through the Belt and Road Initiative and CK Hutchison's port activities, was seen as a strategic danger by the Trump administration. To offset China's influence, the U.S. responded by promoting American investments, closely examining concessions held by China, and pursuing diplomatic initiatives. In order to improve bilateral relations and allay worries about China's involvement in the canal's operations, Secretary of State Marco Rubio held discussions with Panama.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Panama turns to U.S. lobbyists to deal with Trump\u2019s canal threats","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"panama-turns-to-u-s-lobbyists-to-deal-with-trumps-canal-threats","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7878","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":8},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
According to Politico and O'Dwyer, the Panama Maritime Authority (AMP) has agreed to a six-month contract with Checkmate Government Interactions, a US company associated with Trump, to help with interactions with US officials and the Trump administration<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Reports state that the deal started in May and that the AMP would pay a cost of $195,000 each month for six months. Although the Panama Maritime Authority, which is in charge of managing Panama's vast maritime registry and ports, has previously engaged a number of US corporations for lobbying, this is the first time the Panamanian government has done so.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The AMP is run by Checkmate managing partner Ches McDowell, who is reportedly close to Donald Trump Jr., along with partners Fritz Vaughan and Ryan O'Dwyer. Thanks to its connections to Trump, the lobbying tactic from North Carolina has lately spread to Washington.<\/p>\n\n\n\n President Donald Trump has frequently denounced what he considers to be undue Chinese influence over the Panama Canal, focusing in particular on the<\/a> Hong Kong-based corporation CK Hutchison Holdings' control of the ports of Balboa and Cristobal. Asserting that the canal was first constructed by the United States and that \"we didn\u2019t give it to China, we gave it to Panama, and we\u2019re taking it back,\" Trump asserted in his inaugural speech that \"China is operating the Panama Canal\" and that the United States would \"take it back.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n Trump's rhetoric escalated with threats to demand the return of the canal to U.S. control if Panama did not treat American shippers fairly, referencing the 1977 treaty that transferred control to Panama in 1999. He suggested that if the treaty's principles were not respected, the U.S. would reclaim the canal \"quickly and without question,\" a stance firmly rejected by Panama's president, who emphasized Panama's sovereign control over the canal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth recently visited Panama and signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to strengthen military cooperation and support for the Panama Canal security. Through training, rotating U.S. troop deployments, and collaboration to counter Chinese influence in the area, this pact seeks to enhance cooperative security operations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n China's increasing influence in Panama, particularly through the Belt and Road Initiative and CK Hutchison's port activities, was seen as a strategic danger by the Trump administration. To offset China's influence, the U.S. responded by promoting American investments, closely examining concessions held by China, and pursuing diplomatic initiatives. In order to improve bilateral relations and allay worries about China's involvement in the canal's operations, Secretary of State Marco Rubio held discussions with Panama.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Panama turns to U.S. lobbyists to deal with Trump\u2019s canal threats","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"panama-turns-to-u-s-lobbyists-to-deal-with-trumps-canal-threats","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7878","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":8},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
Efforts to ban taxpayer-funded lobbying, such as Texas Senate Bill 19, have faced setbacks. While initially aiming to prohibit political subdivisions from using public funds to hire lobbyists or pay dues to lobby organisations, amendments weakened the bill, allowing nonprofit associations to continue lobbying <\/a>with taxpayer funds.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Harris County\u2019s wallet wide open for lobbyists","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harris-countys-wallet-wide-open-for-lobbyists","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:43:29","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:43:29","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7886","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7878,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-29 13:25:54","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-29 13:25:54","post_content":"\n According to Politico and O'Dwyer, the Panama Maritime Authority (AMP) has agreed to a six-month contract with Checkmate Government Interactions, a US company associated with Trump, to help with interactions with US officials and the Trump administration<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Reports state that the deal started in May and that the AMP would pay a cost of $195,000 each month for six months. Although the Panama Maritime Authority, which is in charge of managing Panama's vast maritime registry and ports, has previously engaged a number of US corporations for lobbying, this is the first time the Panamanian government has done so.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The AMP is run by Checkmate managing partner Ches McDowell, who is reportedly close to Donald Trump Jr., along with partners Fritz Vaughan and Ryan O'Dwyer. Thanks to its connections to Trump, the lobbying tactic from North Carolina has lately spread to Washington.<\/p>\n\n\n\n President Donald Trump has frequently denounced what he considers to be undue Chinese influence over the Panama Canal, focusing in particular on the<\/a> Hong Kong-based corporation CK Hutchison Holdings' control of the ports of Balboa and Cristobal. Asserting that the canal was first constructed by the United States and that \"we didn\u2019t give it to China, we gave it to Panama, and we\u2019re taking it back,\" Trump asserted in his inaugural speech that \"China is operating the Panama Canal\" and that the United States would \"take it back.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n Trump's rhetoric escalated with threats to demand the return of the canal to U.S. control if Panama did not treat American shippers fairly, referencing the 1977 treaty that transferred control to Panama in 1999. He suggested that if the treaty's principles were not respected, the U.S. would reclaim the canal \"quickly and without question,\" a stance firmly rejected by Panama's president, who emphasized Panama's sovereign control over the canal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth recently visited Panama and signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to strengthen military cooperation and support for the Panama Canal security. Through training, rotating U.S. troop deployments, and collaboration to counter Chinese influence in the area, this pact seeks to enhance cooperative security operations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n China's increasing influence in Panama, particularly through the Belt and Road Initiative and CK Hutchison's port activities, was seen as a strategic danger by the Trump administration. To offset China's influence, the U.S. responded by promoting American investments, closely examining concessions held by China, and pursuing diplomatic initiatives. In order to improve bilateral relations and allay worries about China's involvement in the canal's operations, Secretary of State Marco Rubio held discussions with Panama.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Panama turns to U.S. lobbyists to deal with Trump\u2019s canal threats","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"panama-turns-to-u-s-lobbyists-to-deal-with-trumps-canal-threats","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7878","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":8},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
Moreover, In 2025, Harris County and its subsidiaries have spent approximately $160,000 on federal lobbying so far. This includes $40,000 each from the Harris County Sheriff's Office and Harris County Precinct 2.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Efforts to ban taxpayer-funded lobbying, such as Texas Senate Bill 19, have faced setbacks. While initially aiming to prohibit political subdivisions from using public funds to hire lobbyists or pay dues to lobby organisations, amendments weakened the bill, allowing nonprofit associations to continue lobbying <\/a>with taxpayer funds.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Harris County\u2019s wallet wide open for lobbyists","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harris-countys-wallet-wide-open-for-lobbyists","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:43:29","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:43:29","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7886","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7878,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-29 13:25:54","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-29 13:25:54","post_content":"\n According to Politico and O'Dwyer, the Panama Maritime Authority (AMP) has agreed to a six-month contract with Checkmate Government Interactions, a US company associated with Trump, to help with interactions with US officials and the Trump administration<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Reports state that the deal started in May and that the AMP would pay a cost of $195,000 each month for six months. Although the Panama Maritime Authority, which is in charge of managing Panama's vast maritime registry and ports, has previously engaged a number of US corporations for lobbying, this is the first time the Panamanian government has done so.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The AMP is run by Checkmate managing partner Ches McDowell, who is reportedly close to Donald Trump Jr., along with partners Fritz Vaughan and Ryan O'Dwyer. Thanks to its connections to Trump, the lobbying tactic from North Carolina has lately spread to Washington.<\/p>\n\n\n\n President Donald Trump has frequently denounced what he considers to be undue Chinese influence over the Panama Canal, focusing in particular on the<\/a> Hong Kong-based corporation CK Hutchison Holdings' control of the ports of Balboa and Cristobal. Asserting that the canal was first constructed by the United States and that \"we didn\u2019t give it to China, we gave it to Panama, and we\u2019re taking it back,\" Trump asserted in his inaugural speech that \"China is operating the Panama Canal\" and that the United States would \"take it back.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n Trump's rhetoric escalated with threats to demand the return of the canal to U.S. control if Panama did not treat American shippers fairly, referencing the 1977 treaty that transferred control to Panama in 1999. He suggested that if the treaty's principles were not respected, the U.S. would reclaim the canal \"quickly and without question,\" a stance firmly rejected by Panama's president, who emphasized Panama's sovereign control over the canal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth recently visited Panama and signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to strengthen military cooperation and support for the Panama Canal security. Through training, rotating U.S. troop deployments, and collaboration to counter Chinese influence in the area, this pact seeks to enhance cooperative security operations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n China's increasing influence in Panama, particularly through the Belt and Road Initiative and CK Hutchison's port activities, was seen as a strategic danger by the Trump administration. To offset China's influence, the U.S. responded by promoting American investments, closely examining concessions held by China, and pursuing diplomatic initiatives. In order to improve bilateral relations and allay worries about China's involvement in the canal's operations, Secretary of State Marco Rubio held discussions with Panama.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Panama turns to U.S. lobbyists to deal with Trump\u2019s canal threats","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"panama-turns-to-u-s-lobbyists-to-deal-with-trumps-canal-threats","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7878","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":8},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
Regretfully, a bill that would have done so was<\/a> defeated in this session's Texas House, which is controlled by Dade Phelan. According to Siegel, voters must remove elected politicians who favour using taxpayer dollars in this manner, such as County Judge Lina Hidalgo and the Democratic county commissioners running for reelection in 2026, since the legislature did not take action.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Moreover, In 2025, Harris County and its subsidiaries have spent approximately $160,000 on federal lobbying so far. This includes $40,000 each from the Harris County Sheriff's Office and Harris County Precinct 2.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Efforts to ban taxpayer-funded lobbying, such as Texas Senate Bill 19, have faced setbacks. While initially aiming to prohibit political subdivisions from using public funds to hire lobbyists or pay dues to lobby organisations, amendments weakened the bill, allowing nonprofit associations to continue lobbying <\/a>with taxpayer funds.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Harris County\u2019s wallet wide open for lobbyists","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harris-countys-wallet-wide-open-for-lobbyists","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:43:29","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:43:29","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7886","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7878,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-29 13:25:54","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-29 13:25:54","post_content":"\n According to Politico and O'Dwyer, the Panama Maritime Authority (AMP) has agreed to a six-month contract with Checkmate Government Interactions, a US company associated with Trump, to help with interactions with US officials and the Trump administration<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Reports state that the deal started in May and that the AMP would pay a cost of $195,000 each month for six months. Although the Panama Maritime Authority, which is in charge of managing Panama's vast maritime registry and ports, has previously engaged a number of US corporations for lobbying, this is the first time the Panamanian government has done so.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The AMP is run by Checkmate managing partner Ches McDowell, who is reportedly close to Donald Trump Jr., along with partners Fritz Vaughan and Ryan O'Dwyer. Thanks to its connections to Trump, the lobbying tactic from North Carolina has lately spread to Washington.<\/p>\n\n\n\n President Donald Trump has frequently denounced what he considers to be undue Chinese influence over the Panama Canal, focusing in particular on the<\/a> Hong Kong-based corporation CK Hutchison Holdings' control of the ports of Balboa and Cristobal. Asserting that the canal was first constructed by the United States and that \"we didn\u2019t give it to China, we gave it to Panama, and we\u2019re taking it back,\" Trump asserted in his inaugural speech that \"China is operating the Panama Canal\" and that the United States would \"take it back.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n Trump's rhetoric escalated with threats to demand the return of the canal to U.S. control if Panama did not treat American shippers fairly, referencing the 1977 treaty that transferred control to Panama in 1999. He suggested that if the treaty's principles were not respected, the U.S. would reclaim the canal \"quickly and without question,\" a stance firmly rejected by Panama's president, who emphasized Panama's sovereign control over the canal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth recently visited Panama and signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to strengthen military cooperation and support for the Panama Canal security. Through training, rotating U.S. troop deployments, and collaboration to counter Chinese influence in the area, this pact seeks to enhance cooperative security operations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n China's increasing influence in Panama, particularly through the Belt and Road Initiative and CK Hutchison's port activities, was seen as a strategic danger by the Trump administration. To offset China's influence, the U.S. responded by promoting American investments, closely examining concessions held by China, and pursuing diplomatic initiatives. In order to improve bilateral relations and allay worries about China's involvement in the canal's operations, Secretary of State Marco Rubio held discussions with Panama.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Panama turns to U.S. lobbyists to deal with Trump\u2019s canal threats","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"panama-turns-to-u-s-lobbyists-to-deal-with-trumps-canal-threats","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7878","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":8},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
According to Siegel, this has been a major concern among Texans for a number of years, and the Texas GOP platform presently calls for the elimination of taxpayer-funded lobbying. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Regretfully, a bill that would have done so was<\/a> defeated in this session's Texas House, which is controlled by Dade Phelan. According to Siegel, voters must remove elected politicians who favour using taxpayer dollars in this manner, such as County Judge Lina Hidalgo and the Democratic county commissioners running for reelection in 2026, since the legislature did not take action.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Moreover, In 2025, Harris County and its subsidiaries have spent approximately $160,000 on federal lobbying so far. This includes $40,000 each from the Harris County Sheriff's Office and Harris County Precinct 2.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Efforts to ban taxpayer-funded lobbying, such as Texas Senate Bill 19, have faced setbacks. While initially aiming to prohibit political subdivisions from using public funds to hire lobbyists or pay dues to lobby organisations, amendments weakened the bill, allowing nonprofit associations to continue lobbying <\/a>with taxpayer funds.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Harris County\u2019s wallet wide open for lobbyists","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harris-countys-wallet-wide-open-for-lobbyists","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:43:29","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:43:29","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7886","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7878,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-29 13:25:54","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-29 13:25:54","post_content":"\n According to Politico and O'Dwyer, the Panama Maritime Authority (AMP) has agreed to a six-month contract with Checkmate Government Interactions, a US company associated with Trump, to help with interactions with US officials and the Trump administration<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Reports state that the deal started in May and that the AMP would pay a cost of $195,000 each month for six months. Although the Panama Maritime Authority, which is in charge of managing Panama's vast maritime registry and ports, has previously engaged a number of US corporations for lobbying, this is the first time the Panamanian government has done so.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The AMP is run by Checkmate managing partner Ches McDowell, who is reportedly close to Donald Trump Jr., along with partners Fritz Vaughan and Ryan O'Dwyer. Thanks to its connections to Trump, the lobbying tactic from North Carolina has lately spread to Washington.<\/p>\n\n\n\n President Donald Trump has frequently denounced what he considers to be undue Chinese influence over the Panama Canal, focusing in particular on the<\/a> Hong Kong-based corporation CK Hutchison Holdings' control of the ports of Balboa and Cristobal. Asserting that the canal was first constructed by the United States and that \"we didn\u2019t give it to China, we gave it to Panama, and we\u2019re taking it back,\" Trump asserted in his inaugural speech that \"China is operating the Panama Canal\" and that the United States would \"take it back.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n Trump's rhetoric escalated with threats to demand the return of the canal to U.S. control if Panama did not treat American shippers fairly, referencing the 1977 treaty that transferred control to Panama in 1999. He suggested that if the treaty's principles were not respected, the U.S. would reclaim the canal \"quickly and without question,\" a stance firmly rejected by Panama's president, who emphasized Panama's sovereign control over the canal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth recently visited Panama and signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to strengthen military cooperation and support for the Panama Canal security. Through training, rotating U.S. troop deployments, and collaboration to counter Chinese influence in the area, this pact seeks to enhance cooperative security operations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n China's increasing influence in Panama, particularly through the Belt and Road Initiative and CK Hutchison's port activities, was seen as a strategic danger by the Trump administration. To offset China's influence, the U.S. responded by promoting American investments, closely examining concessions held by China, and pursuing diplomatic initiatives. In order to improve bilateral relations and allay worries about China's involvement in the canal's operations, Secretary of State Marco Rubio held discussions with Panama.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Panama turns to U.S. lobbyists to deal with Trump\u2019s canal threats","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"panama-turns-to-u-s-lobbyists-to-deal-with-trumps-canal-threats","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7878","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":8},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
\"Why should we permit our elected officials to use taxpayer funds in this manner to lobby other officials?\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n According to Siegel, this has been a major concern among Texans for a number of years, and the Texas GOP platform presently calls for the elimination of taxpayer-funded lobbying. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Regretfully, a bill that would have done so was<\/a> defeated in this session's Texas House, which is controlled by Dade Phelan. According to Siegel, voters must remove elected politicians who favour using taxpayer dollars in this manner, such as County Judge Lina Hidalgo and the Democratic county commissioners running for reelection in 2026, since the legislature did not take action.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Moreover, In 2025, Harris County and its subsidiaries have spent approximately $160,000 on federal lobbying so far. This includes $40,000 each from the Harris County Sheriff's Office and Harris County Precinct 2.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Efforts to ban taxpayer-funded lobbying, such as Texas Senate Bill 19, have faced setbacks. While initially aiming to prohibit political subdivisions from using public funds to hire lobbyists or pay dues to lobby organisations, amendments weakened the bill, allowing nonprofit associations to continue lobbying <\/a>with taxpayer funds.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Harris County\u2019s wallet wide open for lobbyists","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harris-countys-wallet-wide-open-for-lobbyists","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:43:29","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:43:29","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7886","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7878,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-29 13:25:54","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-29 13:25:54","post_content":"\n According to Politico and O'Dwyer, the Panama Maritime Authority (AMP) has agreed to a six-month contract with Checkmate Government Interactions, a US company associated with Trump, to help with interactions with US officials and the Trump administration<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Reports state that the deal started in May and that the AMP would pay a cost of $195,000 each month for six months. Although the Panama Maritime Authority, which is in charge of managing Panama's vast maritime registry and ports, has previously engaged a number of US corporations for lobbying, this is the first time the Panamanian government has done so.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The AMP is run by Checkmate managing partner Ches McDowell, who is reportedly close to Donald Trump Jr., along with partners Fritz Vaughan and Ryan O'Dwyer. Thanks to its connections to Trump, the lobbying tactic from North Carolina has lately spread to Washington.<\/p>\n\n\n\n President Donald Trump has frequently denounced what he considers to be undue Chinese influence over the Panama Canal, focusing in particular on the<\/a> Hong Kong-based corporation CK Hutchison Holdings' control of the ports of Balboa and Cristobal. Asserting that the canal was first constructed by the United States and that \"we didn\u2019t give it to China, we gave it to Panama, and we\u2019re taking it back,\" Trump asserted in his inaugural speech that \"China is operating the Panama Canal\" and that the United States would \"take it back.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n Trump's rhetoric escalated with threats to demand the return of the canal to U.S. control if Panama did not treat American shippers fairly, referencing the 1977 treaty that transferred control to Panama in 1999. He suggested that if the treaty's principles were not respected, the U.S. would reclaim the canal \"quickly and without question,\" a stance firmly rejected by Panama's president, who emphasized Panama's sovereign control over the canal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth recently visited Panama and signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to strengthen military cooperation and support for the Panama Canal security. Through training, rotating U.S. troop deployments, and collaboration to counter Chinese influence in the area, this pact seeks to enhance cooperative security operations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n China's increasing influence in Panama, particularly through the Belt and Road Initiative and CK Hutchison's port activities, was seen as a strategic danger by the Trump administration. To offset China's influence, the U.S. responded by promoting American investments, closely examining concessions held by China, and pursuing diplomatic initiatives. In order to improve bilateral relations and allay worries about China's involvement in the canal's operations, Secretary of State Marco Rubio held discussions with Panama.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Panama turns to U.S. lobbyists to deal with Trump\u2019s canal threats","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"panama-turns-to-u-s-lobbyists-to-deal-with-trumps-canal-threats","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7878","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":8},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
\"Why should we permit our elected officials to use taxpayer funds in this manner to lobby other officials?\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n According to Siegel, this has been a major concern among Texans for a number of years, and the Texas GOP platform presently calls for the elimination of taxpayer-funded lobbying. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Regretfully, a bill that would have done so was<\/a> defeated in this session's Texas House, which is controlled by Dade Phelan. According to Siegel, voters must remove elected politicians who favour using taxpayer dollars in this manner, such as County Judge Lina Hidalgo and the Democratic county commissioners running for reelection in 2026, since the legislature did not take action.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Moreover, In 2025, Harris County and its subsidiaries have spent approximately $160,000 on federal lobbying so far. This includes $40,000 each from the Harris County Sheriff's Office and Harris County Precinct 2.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Efforts to ban taxpayer-funded lobbying, such as Texas Senate Bill 19, have faced setbacks. While initially aiming to prohibit political subdivisions from using public funds to hire lobbyists or pay dues to lobby organisations, amendments weakened the bill, allowing nonprofit associations to continue lobbying <\/a>with taxpayer funds.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Harris County\u2019s wallet wide open for lobbyists","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harris-countys-wallet-wide-open-for-lobbyists","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:43:29","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:43:29","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7886","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7878,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-29 13:25:54","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-29 13:25:54","post_content":"\n According to Politico and O'Dwyer, the Panama Maritime Authority (AMP) has agreed to a six-month contract with Checkmate Government Interactions, a US company associated with Trump, to help with interactions with US officials and the Trump administration<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Reports state that the deal started in May and that the AMP would pay a cost of $195,000 each month for six months. Although the Panama Maritime Authority, which is in charge of managing Panama's vast maritime registry and ports, has previously engaged a number of US corporations for lobbying, this is the first time the Panamanian government has done so.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The AMP is run by Checkmate managing partner Ches McDowell, who is reportedly close to Donald Trump Jr., along with partners Fritz Vaughan and Ryan O'Dwyer. Thanks to its connections to Trump, the lobbying tactic from North Carolina has lately spread to Washington.<\/p>\n\n\n\n President Donald Trump has frequently denounced what he considers to be undue Chinese influence over the Panama Canal, focusing in particular on the<\/a> Hong Kong-based corporation CK Hutchison Holdings' control of the ports of Balboa and Cristobal. Asserting that the canal was first constructed by the United States and that \"we didn\u2019t give it to China, we gave it to Panama, and we\u2019re taking it back,\" Trump asserted in his inaugural speech that \"China is operating the Panama Canal\" and that the United States would \"take it back.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n Trump's rhetoric escalated with threats to demand the return of the canal to U.S. control if Panama did not treat American shippers fairly, referencing the 1977 treaty that transferred control to Panama in 1999. He suggested that if the treaty's principles were not respected, the U.S. would reclaim the canal \"quickly and without question,\" a stance firmly rejected by Panama's president, who emphasized Panama's sovereign control over the canal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth recently visited Panama and signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to strengthen military cooperation and support for the Panama Canal security. Through training, rotating U.S. troop deployments, and collaboration to counter Chinese influence in the area, this pact seeks to enhance cooperative security operations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n China's increasing influence in Panama, particularly through the Belt and Road Initiative and CK Hutchison's port activities, was seen as a strategic danger by the Trump administration. To offset China's influence, the U.S. responded by promoting American investments, closely examining concessions held by China, and pursuing diplomatic initiatives. In order to improve bilateral relations and allay worries about China's involvement in the canal's operations, Secretary of State Marco Rubio held discussions with Panama.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Panama turns to U.S. lobbyists to deal with Trump\u2019s canal threats","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"panama-turns-to-u-s-lobbyists-to-deal-with-trumps-canal-threats","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7878","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":8},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
She also said that, like many citizen activists, government representatives ought to invest their own time and resources in promoting legislation that matters to them. She asked, <\/p>\n\n\n\n \"Why should we permit our elected officials to use taxpayer funds in this manner to lobby other officials?\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n According to Siegel, this has been a major concern among Texans for a number of years, and the Texas GOP platform presently calls for the elimination of taxpayer-funded lobbying. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Regretfully, a bill that would have done so was<\/a> defeated in this session's Texas House, which is controlled by Dade Phelan. According to Siegel, voters must remove elected politicians who favour using taxpayer dollars in this manner, such as County Judge Lina Hidalgo and the Democratic county commissioners running for reelection in 2026, since the legislature did not take action.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Moreover, In 2025, Harris County and its subsidiaries have spent approximately $160,000 on federal lobbying so far. This includes $40,000 each from the Harris County Sheriff's Office and Harris County Precinct 2.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Efforts to ban taxpayer-funded lobbying, such as Texas Senate Bill 19, have faced setbacks. While initially aiming to prohibit political subdivisions from using public funds to hire lobbyists or pay dues to lobby organisations, amendments weakened the bill, allowing nonprofit associations to continue lobbying <\/a>with taxpayer funds.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Harris County\u2019s wallet wide open for lobbyists","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harris-countys-wallet-wide-open-for-lobbyists","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:43:29","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:43:29","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7886","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7878,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-29 13:25:54","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-29 13:25:54","post_content":"\n According to Politico and O'Dwyer, the Panama Maritime Authority (AMP) has agreed to a six-month contract with Checkmate Government Interactions, a US company associated with Trump, to help with interactions with US officials and the Trump administration<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Reports state that the deal started in May and that the AMP would pay a cost of $195,000 each month for six months. Although the Panama Maritime Authority, which is in charge of managing Panama's vast maritime registry and ports, has previously engaged a number of US corporations for lobbying, this is the first time the Panamanian government has done so.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The AMP is run by Checkmate managing partner Ches McDowell, who is reportedly close to Donald Trump Jr., along with partners Fritz Vaughan and Ryan O'Dwyer. Thanks to its connections to Trump, the lobbying tactic from North Carolina has lately spread to Washington.<\/p>\n\n\n\n President Donald Trump has frequently denounced what he considers to be undue Chinese influence over the Panama Canal, focusing in particular on the<\/a> Hong Kong-based corporation CK Hutchison Holdings' control of the ports of Balboa and Cristobal. Asserting that the canal was first constructed by the United States and that \"we didn\u2019t give it to China, we gave it to Panama, and we\u2019re taking it back,\" Trump asserted in his inaugural speech that \"China is operating the Panama Canal\" and that the United States would \"take it back.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n Trump's rhetoric escalated with threats to demand the return of the canal to U.S. control if Panama did not treat American shippers fairly, referencing the 1977 treaty that transferred control to Panama in 1999. He suggested that if the treaty's principles were not respected, the U.S. would reclaim the canal \"quickly and without question,\" a stance firmly rejected by Panama's president, who emphasized Panama's sovereign control over the canal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth recently visited Panama and signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to strengthen military cooperation and support for the Panama Canal security. Through training, rotating U.S. troop deployments, and collaboration to counter Chinese influence in the area, this pact seeks to enhance cooperative security operations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n China's increasing influence in Panama, particularly through the Belt and Road Initiative and CK Hutchison's port activities, was seen as a strategic danger by the Trump administration. To offset China's influence, the U.S. responded by promoting American investments, closely examining concessions held by China, and pursuing diplomatic initiatives. In order to improve bilateral relations and allay worries about China's involvement in the canal's operations, Secretary of State Marco Rubio held discussions with Panama.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Panama turns to U.S. lobbyists to deal with Trump\u2019s canal threats","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"panama-turns-to-u-s-lobbyists-to-deal-with-trumps-canal-threats","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7878","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":8},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
\"We harris County has lacked transparency regarding taxpayer spending in recent years dollars.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n She also said that, like many citizen activists, government representatives ought to invest their own time and resources in promoting legislation that matters to them. She asked, <\/p>\n\n\n\n \"Why should we permit our elected officials to use taxpayer funds in this manner to lobby other officials?\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n According to Siegel, this has been a major concern among Texans for a number of years, and the Texas GOP platform presently calls for the elimination of taxpayer-funded lobbying. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Regretfully, a bill that would have done so was<\/a> defeated in this session's Texas House, which is controlled by Dade Phelan. According to Siegel, voters must remove elected politicians who favour using taxpayer dollars in this manner, such as County Judge Lina Hidalgo and the Democratic county commissioners running for reelection in 2026, since the legislature did not take action.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Moreover, In 2025, Harris County and its subsidiaries have spent approximately $160,000 on federal lobbying so far. This includes $40,000 each from the Harris County Sheriff's Office and Harris County Precinct 2.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Efforts to ban taxpayer-funded lobbying, such as Texas Senate Bill 19, have faced setbacks. While initially aiming to prohibit political subdivisions from using public funds to hire lobbyists or pay dues to lobby organisations, amendments weakened the bill, allowing nonprofit associations to continue lobbying <\/a>with taxpayer funds.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Harris County\u2019s wallet wide open for lobbyists","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harris-countys-wallet-wide-open-for-lobbyists","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:43:29","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:43:29","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7886","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7878,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-29 13:25:54","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-29 13:25:54","post_content":"\n According to Politico and O'Dwyer, the Panama Maritime Authority (AMP) has agreed to a six-month contract with Checkmate Government Interactions, a US company associated with Trump, to help with interactions with US officials and the Trump administration<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Reports state that the deal started in May and that the AMP would pay a cost of $195,000 each month for six months. Although the Panama Maritime Authority, which is in charge of managing Panama's vast maritime registry and ports, has previously engaged a number of US corporations for lobbying, this is the first time the Panamanian government has done so.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The AMP is run by Checkmate managing partner Ches McDowell, who is reportedly close to Donald Trump Jr., along with partners Fritz Vaughan and Ryan O'Dwyer. Thanks to its connections to Trump, the lobbying tactic from North Carolina has lately spread to Washington.<\/p>\n\n\n\n President Donald Trump has frequently denounced what he considers to be undue Chinese influence over the Panama Canal, focusing in particular on the<\/a> Hong Kong-based corporation CK Hutchison Holdings' control of the ports of Balboa and Cristobal. Asserting that the canal was first constructed by the United States and that \"we didn\u2019t give it to China, we gave it to Panama, and we\u2019re taking it back,\" Trump asserted in his inaugural speech that \"China is operating the Panama Canal\" and that the United States would \"take it back.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n Trump's rhetoric escalated with threats to demand the return of the canal to U.S. control if Panama did not treat American shippers fairly, referencing the 1977 treaty that transferred control to Panama in 1999. He suggested that if the treaty's principles were not respected, the U.S. would reclaim the canal \"quickly and without question,\" a stance firmly rejected by Panama's president, who emphasized Panama's sovereign control over the canal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth recently visited Panama and signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to strengthen military cooperation and support for the Panama Canal security. Through training, rotating U.S. troop deployments, and collaboration to counter Chinese influence in the area, this pact seeks to enhance cooperative security operations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n China's increasing influence in Panama, particularly through the Belt and Road Initiative and CK Hutchison's port activities, was seen as a strategic danger by the Trump administration. To offset China's influence, the U.S. responded by promoting American investments, closely examining concessions held by China, and pursuing diplomatic initiatives. In order to improve bilateral relations and allay worries about China's involvement in the canal's operations, Secretary of State Marco Rubio held discussions with Panama.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Panama turns to U.S. lobbyists to deal with Trump\u2019s canal threats","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"panama-turns-to-u-s-lobbyists-to-deal-with-trumps-canal-threats","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7878","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":8},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
\"We harris County has lacked transparency regarding taxpayer spending in recent years dollars.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n She also said that, like many citizen activists, government representatives ought to invest their own time and resources in promoting legislation that matters to them. She asked, <\/p>\n\n\n\n \"Why should we permit our elected officials to use taxpayer funds in this manner to lobby other officials?\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n According to Siegel, this has been a major concern among Texans for a number of years, and the Texas GOP platform presently calls for the elimination of taxpayer-funded lobbying. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Regretfully, a bill that would have done so was<\/a> defeated in this session's Texas House, which is controlled by Dade Phelan. According to Siegel, voters must remove elected politicians who favour using taxpayer dollars in this manner, such as County Judge Lina Hidalgo and the Democratic county commissioners running for reelection in 2026, since the legislature did not take action.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Moreover, In 2025, Harris County and its subsidiaries have spent approximately $160,000 on federal lobbying so far. This includes $40,000 each from the Harris County Sheriff's Office and Harris County Precinct 2.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Efforts to ban taxpayer-funded lobbying, such as Texas Senate Bill 19, have faced setbacks. While initially aiming to prohibit political subdivisions from using public funds to hire lobbyists or pay dues to lobby organisations, amendments weakened the bill, allowing nonprofit associations to continue lobbying <\/a>with taxpayer funds.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Harris County\u2019s wallet wide open for lobbyists","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harris-countys-wallet-wide-open-for-lobbyists","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:43:29","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:43:29","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7886","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7878,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-29 13:25:54","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-29 13:25:54","post_content":"\n According to Politico and O'Dwyer, the Panama Maritime Authority (AMP) has agreed to a six-month contract with Checkmate Government Interactions, a US company associated with Trump, to help with interactions with US officials and the Trump administration<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Reports state that the deal started in May and that the AMP would pay a cost of $195,000 each month for six months. Although the Panama Maritime Authority, which is in charge of managing Panama's vast maritime registry and ports, has previously engaged a number of US corporations for lobbying, this is the first time the Panamanian government has done so.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The AMP is run by Checkmate managing partner Ches McDowell, who is reportedly close to Donald Trump Jr., along with partners Fritz Vaughan and Ryan O'Dwyer. Thanks to its connections to Trump, the lobbying tactic from North Carolina has lately spread to Washington.<\/p>\n\n\n\n President Donald Trump has frequently denounced what he considers to be undue Chinese influence over the Panama Canal, focusing in particular on the<\/a> Hong Kong-based corporation CK Hutchison Holdings' control of the ports of Balboa and Cristobal. Asserting that the canal was first constructed by the United States and that \"we didn\u2019t give it to China, we gave it to Panama, and we\u2019re taking it back,\" Trump asserted in his inaugural speech that \"China is operating the Panama Canal\" and that the United States would \"take it back.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n Trump's rhetoric escalated with threats to demand the return of the canal to U.S. control if Panama did not treat American shippers fairly, referencing the 1977 treaty that transferred control to Panama in 1999. He suggested that if the treaty's principles were not respected, the U.S. would reclaim the canal \"quickly and without question,\" a stance firmly rejected by Panama's president, who emphasized Panama's sovereign control over the canal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth recently visited Panama and signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to strengthen military cooperation and support for the Panama Canal security. Through training, rotating U.S. troop deployments, and collaboration to counter Chinese influence in the area, this pact seeks to enhance cooperative security operations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n China's increasing influence in Panama, particularly through the Belt and Road Initiative and CK Hutchison's port activities, was seen as a strategic danger by the Trump administration. To offset China's influence, the U.S. responded by promoting American investments, closely examining concessions held by China, and pursuing diplomatic initiatives. In order to improve bilateral relations and allay worries about China's involvement in the canal's operations, Secretary of State Marco Rubio held discussions with Panama.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Panama turns to U.S. lobbyists to deal with Trump\u2019s canal threats","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"panama-turns-to-u-s-lobbyists-to-deal-with-trumps-canal-threats","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7878","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":8},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
The fact that there is almost no accountability for this money is among the worst aspects of it all. Cindy Siegel, the Harris County GOP Chair, discussed this with KTRH and stated, <\/p>\n\n\n\n \"We harris County has lacked transparency regarding taxpayer spending in recent years dollars.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n She also said that, like many citizen activists, government representatives ought to invest their own time and resources in promoting legislation that matters to them. She asked, <\/p>\n\n\n\n \"Why should we permit our elected officials to use taxpayer funds in this manner to lobby other officials?\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n According to Siegel, this has been a major concern among Texans for a number of years, and the Texas GOP platform presently calls for the elimination of taxpayer-funded lobbying. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Regretfully, a bill that would have done so was<\/a> defeated in this session's Texas House, which is controlled by Dade Phelan. According to Siegel, voters must remove elected politicians who favour using taxpayer dollars in this manner, such as County Judge Lina Hidalgo and the Democratic county commissioners running for reelection in 2026, since the legislature did not take action.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Moreover, In 2025, Harris County and its subsidiaries have spent approximately $160,000 on federal lobbying so far. This includes $40,000 each from the Harris County Sheriff's Office and Harris County Precinct 2.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Efforts to ban taxpayer-funded lobbying, such as Texas Senate Bill 19, have faced setbacks. While initially aiming to prohibit political subdivisions from using public funds to hire lobbyists or pay dues to lobby organisations, amendments weakened the bill, allowing nonprofit associations to continue lobbying <\/a>with taxpayer funds.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Harris County\u2019s wallet wide open for lobbyists","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harris-countys-wallet-wide-open-for-lobbyists","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:43:29","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:43:29","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7886","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7878,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-29 13:25:54","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-29 13:25:54","post_content":"\n According to Politico and O'Dwyer, the Panama Maritime Authority (AMP) has agreed to a six-month contract with Checkmate Government Interactions, a US company associated with Trump, to help with interactions with US officials and the Trump administration<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Reports state that the deal started in May and that the AMP would pay a cost of $195,000 each month for six months. Although the Panama Maritime Authority, which is in charge of managing Panama's vast maritime registry and ports, has previously engaged a number of US corporations for lobbying, this is the first time the Panamanian government has done so.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The AMP is run by Checkmate managing partner Ches McDowell, who is reportedly close to Donald Trump Jr., along with partners Fritz Vaughan and Ryan O'Dwyer. Thanks to its connections to Trump, the lobbying tactic from North Carolina has lately spread to Washington.<\/p>\n\n\n\n President Donald Trump has frequently denounced what he considers to be undue Chinese influence over the Panama Canal, focusing in particular on the<\/a> Hong Kong-based corporation CK Hutchison Holdings' control of the ports of Balboa and Cristobal. Asserting that the canal was first constructed by the United States and that \"we didn\u2019t give it to China, we gave it to Panama, and we\u2019re taking it back,\" Trump asserted in his inaugural speech that \"China is operating the Panama Canal\" and that the United States would \"take it back.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n Trump's rhetoric escalated with threats to demand the return of the canal to U.S. control if Panama did not treat American shippers fairly, referencing the 1977 treaty that transferred control to Panama in 1999. He suggested that if the treaty's principles were not respected, the U.S. would reclaim the canal \"quickly and without question,\" a stance firmly rejected by Panama's president, who emphasized Panama's sovereign control over the canal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth recently visited Panama and signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to strengthen military cooperation and support for the Panama Canal security. Through training, rotating U.S. troop deployments, and collaboration to counter Chinese influence in the area, this pact seeks to enhance cooperative security operations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n China's increasing influence in Panama, particularly through the Belt and Road Initiative and CK Hutchison's port activities, was seen as a strategic danger by the Trump administration. To offset China's influence, the U.S. responded by promoting American investments, closely examining concessions held by China, and pursuing diplomatic initiatives. In order to improve bilateral relations and allay worries about China's involvement in the canal's operations, Secretary of State Marco Rubio held discussions with Panama.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Panama turns to U.S. lobbyists to deal with Trump\u2019s canal threats","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"panama-turns-to-u-s-lobbyists-to-deal-with-trumps-canal-threats","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7878","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":8},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
The use of taxpayer funds for lobbying has been a contentious issue in Texas politics. Critics argue that taxpayer-funded lobbying often lacks transparency and may push for policies contrary to citizens\u2019 interests, such as higher taxes or increased spending. A survey by the Texas Public Policy Foundation found that 81% of Texans oppose taxpayer-funded lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The fact that there is almost no accountability for this money is among the worst aspects of it all. Cindy Siegel, the Harris County GOP Chair, discussed this with KTRH and stated, <\/p>\n\n\n\n \"We harris County has lacked transparency regarding taxpayer spending in recent years dollars.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n She also said that, like many citizen activists, government representatives ought to invest their own time and resources in promoting legislation that matters to them. She asked, <\/p>\n\n\n\n \"Why should we permit our elected officials to use taxpayer funds in this manner to lobby other officials?\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n According to Siegel, this has been a major concern among Texans for a number of years, and the Texas GOP platform presently calls for the elimination of taxpayer-funded lobbying. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Regretfully, a bill that would have done so was<\/a> defeated in this session's Texas House, which is controlled by Dade Phelan. According to Siegel, voters must remove elected politicians who favour using taxpayer dollars in this manner, such as County Judge Lina Hidalgo and the Democratic county commissioners running for reelection in 2026, since the legislature did not take action.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Moreover, In 2025, Harris County and its subsidiaries have spent approximately $160,000 on federal lobbying so far. This includes $40,000 each from the Harris County Sheriff's Office and Harris County Precinct 2.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Efforts to ban taxpayer-funded lobbying, such as Texas Senate Bill 19, have faced setbacks. While initially aiming to prohibit political subdivisions from using public funds to hire lobbyists or pay dues to lobby organisations, amendments weakened the bill, allowing nonprofit associations to continue lobbying <\/a>with taxpayer funds.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Harris County\u2019s wallet wide open for lobbyists","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harris-countys-wallet-wide-open-for-lobbyists","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:43:29","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:43:29","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7886","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7878,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-29 13:25:54","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-29 13:25:54","post_content":"\n According to Politico and O'Dwyer, the Panama Maritime Authority (AMP) has agreed to a six-month contract with Checkmate Government Interactions, a US company associated with Trump, to help with interactions with US officials and the Trump administration<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Reports state that the deal started in May and that the AMP would pay a cost of $195,000 each month for six months. Although the Panama Maritime Authority, which is in charge of managing Panama's vast maritime registry and ports, has previously engaged a number of US corporations for lobbying, this is the first time the Panamanian government has done so.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The AMP is run by Checkmate managing partner Ches McDowell, who is reportedly close to Donald Trump Jr., along with partners Fritz Vaughan and Ryan O'Dwyer. Thanks to its connections to Trump, the lobbying tactic from North Carolina has lately spread to Washington.<\/p>\n\n\n\n President Donald Trump has frequently denounced what he considers to be undue Chinese influence over the Panama Canal, focusing in particular on the<\/a> Hong Kong-based corporation CK Hutchison Holdings' control of the ports of Balboa and Cristobal. Asserting that the canal was first constructed by the United States and that \"we didn\u2019t give it to China, we gave it to Panama, and we\u2019re taking it back,\" Trump asserted in his inaugural speech that \"China is operating the Panama Canal\" and that the United States would \"take it back.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n Trump's rhetoric escalated with threats to demand the return of the canal to U.S. control if Panama did not treat American shippers fairly, referencing the 1977 treaty that transferred control to Panama in 1999. He suggested that if the treaty's principles were not respected, the U.S. would reclaim the canal \"quickly and without question,\" a stance firmly rejected by Panama's president, who emphasized Panama's sovereign control over the canal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth recently visited Panama and signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to strengthen military cooperation and support for the Panama Canal security. Through training, rotating U.S. troop deployments, and collaboration to counter Chinese influence in the area, this pact seeks to enhance cooperative security operations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n China's increasing influence in Panama, particularly through the Belt and Road Initiative and CK Hutchison's port activities, was seen as a strategic danger by the Trump administration. To offset China's influence, the U.S. responded by promoting American investments, closely examining concessions held by China, and pursuing diplomatic initiatives. In order to improve bilateral relations and allay worries about China's involvement in the canal's operations, Secretary of State Marco Rubio held discussions with Panama.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Panama turns to U.S. lobbyists to deal with Trump\u2019s canal threats","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"panama-turns-to-u-s-lobbyists-to-deal-with-trumps-canal-threats","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7878","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":8},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
The Harris County Metropolitan Transit Authority, the County Attorney's Office, and even the Commissioners Court itself have paid up to hundreds of thousands of dollars for lobbying operations, according to statistics from Transparency USA and OpenSecrets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The use of taxpayer funds for lobbying has been a contentious issue in Texas politics. Critics argue that taxpayer-funded lobbying often lacks transparency and may push for policies contrary to citizens\u2019 interests, such as higher taxes or increased spending. A survey by the Texas Public Policy Foundation found that 81% of Texans oppose taxpayer-funded lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The fact that there is almost no accountability for this money is among the worst aspects of it all. Cindy Siegel, the Harris County GOP Chair, discussed this with KTRH and stated, <\/p>\n\n\n\n \"We harris County has lacked transparency regarding taxpayer spending in recent years dollars.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n She also said that, like many citizen activists, government representatives ought to invest their own time and resources in promoting legislation that matters to them. She asked, <\/p>\n\n\n\n \"Why should we permit our elected officials to use taxpayer funds in this manner to lobby other officials?\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n According to Siegel, this has been a major concern among Texans for a number of years, and the Texas GOP platform presently calls for the elimination of taxpayer-funded lobbying. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Regretfully, a bill that would have done so was<\/a> defeated in this session's Texas House, which is controlled by Dade Phelan. According to Siegel, voters must remove elected politicians who favour using taxpayer dollars in this manner, such as County Judge Lina Hidalgo and the Democratic county commissioners running for reelection in 2026, since the legislature did not take action.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Moreover, In 2025, Harris County and its subsidiaries have spent approximately $160,000 on federal lobbying so far. This includes $40,000 each from the Harris County Sheriff's Office and Harris County Precinct 2.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Efforts to ban taxpayer-funded lobbying, such as Texas Senate Bill 19, have faced setbacks. While initially aiming to prohibit political subdivisions from using public funds to hire lobbyists or pay dues to lobby organisations, amendments weakened the bill, allowing nonprofit associations to continue lobbying <\/a>with taxpayer funds.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Harris County\u2019s wallet wide open for lobbyists","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harris-countys-wallet-wide-open-for-lobbyists","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:43:29","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:43:29","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7886","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7878,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-29 13:25:54","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-29 13:25:54","post_content":"\n According to Politico and O'Dwyer, the Panama Maritime Authority (AMP) has agreed to a six-month contract with Checkmate Government Interactions, a US company associated with Trump, to help with interactions with US officials and the Trump administration<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Reports state that the deal started in May and that the AMP would pay a cost of $195,000 each month for six months. Although the Panama Maritime Authority, which is in charge of managing Panama's vast maritime registry and ports, has previously engaged a number of US corporations for lobbying, this is the first time the Panamanian government has done so.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The AMP is run by Checkmate managing partner Ches McDowell, who is reportedly close to Donald Trump Jr., along with partners Fritz Vaughan and Ryan O'Dwyer. Thanks to its connections to Trump, the lobbying tactic from North Carolina has lately spread to Washington.<\/p>\n\n\n\n President Donald Trump has frequently denounced what he considers to be undue Chinese influence over the Panama Canal, focusing in particular on the<\/a> Hong Kong-based corporation CK Hutchison Holdings' control of the ports of Balboa and Cristobal. Asserting that the canal was first constructed by the United States and that \"we didn\u2019t give it to China, we gave it to Panama, and we\u2019re taking it back,\" Trump asserted in his inaugural speech that \"China is operating the Panama Canal\" and that the United States would \"take it back.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n Trump's rhetoric escalated with threats to demand the return of the canal to U.S. control if Panama did not treat American shippers fairly, referencing the 1977 treaty that transferred control to Panama in 1999. He suggested that if the treaty's principles were not respected, the U.S. would reclaim the canal \"quickly and without question,\" a stance firmly rejected by Panama's president, who emphasized Panama's sovereign control over the canal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth recently visited Panama and signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to strengthen military cooperation and support for the Panama Canal security. Through training, rotating U.S. troop deployments, and collaboration to counter Chinese influence in the area, this pact seeks to enhance cooperative security operations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n China's increasing influence in Panama, particularly through the Belt and Road Initiative and CK Hutchison's port activities, was seen as a strategic danger by the Trump administration. To offset China's influence, the U.S. responded by promoting American investments, closely examining concessions held by China, and pursuing diplomatic initiatives. In order to improve bilateral relations and allay worries about China's involvement in the canal's operations, Secretary of State Marco Rubio held discussions with Panama.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Panama turns to U.S. lobbyists to deal with Trump\u2019s canal threats","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"panama-turns-to-u-s-lobbyists-to-deal-with-trumps-canal-threats","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7878","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":8},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
It has been disclosed that since 2023, up to $5.5 million has been put aside by several Harris County departments and agencies to fund lobbying activities, as the county's budget war rages on.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Harris County Metropolitan Transit Authority, the County Attorney's Office, and even the Commissioners Court itself have paid up to hundreds of thousands of dollars for lobbying operations, according to statistics from Transparency USA and OpenSecrets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The use of taxpayer funds for lobbying has been a contentious issue in Texas politics. Critics argue that taxpayer-funded lobbying often lacks transparency and may push for policies contrary to citizens\u2019 interests, such as higher taxes or increased spending. A survey by the Texas Public Policy Foundation found that 81% of Texans oppose taxpayer-funded lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The fact that there is almost no accountability for this money is among the worst aspects of it all. Cindy Siegel, the Harris County GOP Chair, discussed this with KTRH and stated, <\/p>\n\n\n\n \"We harris County has lacked transparency regarding taxpayer spending in recent years dollars.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n She also said that, like many citizen activists, government representatives ought to invest their own time and resources in promoting legislation that matters to them. She asked, <\/p>\n\n\n\n \"Why should we permit our elected officials to use taxpayer funds in this manner to lobby other officials?\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n According to Siegel, this has been a major concern among Texans for a number of years, and the Texas GOP platform presently calls for the elimination of taxpayer-funded lobbying. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Regretfully, a bill that would have done so was<\/a> defeated in this session's Texas House, which is controlled by Dade Phelan. According to Siegel, voters must remove elected politicians who favour using taxpayer dollars in this manner, such as County Judge Lina Hidalgo and the Democratic county commissioners running for reelection in 2026, since the legislature did not take action.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Moreover, In 2025, Harris County and its subsidiaries have spent approximately $160,000 on federal lobbying so far. This includes $40,000 each from the Harris County Sheriff's Office and Harris County Precinct 2.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Efforts to ban taxpayer-funded lobbying, such as Texas Senate Bill 19, have faced setbacks. While initially aiming to prohibit political subdivisions from using public funds to hire lobbyists or pay dues to lobby organisations, amendments weakened the bill, allowing nonprofit associations to continue lobbying <\/a>with taxpayer funds.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Harris County\u2019s wallet wide open for lobbyists","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harris-countys-wallet-wide-open-for-lobbyists","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:43:29","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:43:29","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7886","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7878,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-29 13:25:54","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-29 13:25:54","post_content":"\n According to Politico and O'Dwyer, the Panama Maritime Authority (AMP) has agreed to a six-month contract with Checkmate Government Interactions, a US company associated with Trump, to help with interactions with US officials and the Trump administration<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Reports state that the deal started in May and that the AMP would pay a cost of $195,000 each month for six months. Although the Panama Maritime Authority, which is in charge of managing Panama's vast maritime registry and ports, has previously engaged a number of US corporations for lobbying, this is the first time the Panamanian government has done so.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The AMP is run by Checkmate managing partner Ches McDowell, who is reportedly close to Donald Trump Jr., along with partners Fritz Vaughan and Ryan O'Dwyer. Thanks to its connections to Trump, the lobbying tactic from North Carolina has lately spread to Washington.<\/p>\n\n\n\n President Donald Trump has frequently denounced what he considers to be undue Chinese influence over the Panama Canal, focusing in particular on the<\/a> Hong Kong-based corporation CK Hutchison Holdings' control of the ports of Balboa and Cristobal. Asserting that the canal was first constructed by the United States and that \"we didn\u2019t give it to China, we gave it to Panama, and we\u2019re taking it back,\" Trump asserted in his inaugural speech that \"China is operating the Panama Canal\" and that the United States would \"take it back.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n Trump's rhetoric escalated with threats to demand the return of the canal to U.S. control if Panama did not treat American shippers fairly, referencing the 1977 treaty that transferred control to Panama in 1999. He suggested that if the treaty's principles were not respected, the U.S. would reclaim the canal \"quickly and without question,\" a stance firmly rejected by Panama's president, who emphasized Panama's sovereign control over the canal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth recently visited Panama and signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to strengthen military cooperation and support for the Panama Canal security. Through training, rotating U.S. troop deployments, and collaboration to counter Chinese influence in the area, this pact seeks to enhance cooperative security operations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n China's increasing influence in Panama, particularly through the Belt and Road Initiative and CK Hutchison's port activities, was seen as a strategic danger by the Trump administration. To offset China's influence, the U.S. responded by promoting American investments, closely examining concessions held by China, and pursuing diplomatic initiatives. In order to improve bilateral relations and allay worries about China's involvement in the canal's operations, Secretary of State Marco Rubio held discussions with Panama.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Panama turns to U.S. lobbyists to deal with Trump\u2019s canal threats","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"panama-turns-to-u-s-lobbyists-to-deal-with-trumps-canal-threats","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7878","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":8},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
Musk has frequently emphasised that Tesla\u2019s future value hinges on AI, robotics, and autonomous driving. Tesla\u2019s upcoming launch of a robotaxi service in Austin, Texas, scheduled for June 12, 2025, exemplifies this strategic focus. This service depends on regulatory approval and a clear federal framework to operate at scale.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Elon Musk is lobbying to influence lawmakers on self-driving vehicle legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"elon-musk-is-lobbying-to-influence-lawmakers-on-self-driving-vehicle-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:57:08","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:57:08","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7893","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7886,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-29 13:36:41","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-29 13:36:41","post_content":"\n It has been disclosed that since 2023, up to $5.5 million has been put aside by several Harris County departments and agencies to fund lobbying activities, as the county's budget war rages on.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Harris County Metropolitan Transit Authority, the County Attorney's Office, and even the Commissioners Court itself have paid up to hundreds of thousands of dollars for lobbying operations, according to statistics from Transparency USA and OpenSecrets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The use of taxpayer funds for lobbying has been a contentious issue in Texas politics. Critics argue that taxpayer-funded lobbying often lacks transparency and may push for policies contrary to citizens\u2019 interests, such as higher taxes or increased spending. A survey by the Texas Public Policy Foundation found that 81% of Texans oppose taxpayer-funded lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The fact that there is almost no accountability for this money is among the worst aspects of it all. Cindy Siegel, the Harris County GOP Chair, discussed this with KTRH and stated, <\/p>\n\n\n\n \"We harris County has lacked transparency regarding taxpayer spending in recent years dollars.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n She also said that, like many citizen activists, government representatives ought to invest their own time and resources in promoting legislation that matters to them. She asked, <\/p>\n\n\n\n \"Why should we permit our elected officials to use taxpayer funds in this manner to lobby other officials?\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n According to Siegel, this has been a major concern among Texans for a number of years, and the Texas GOP platform presently calls for the elimination of taxpayer-funded lobbying. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Regretfully, a bill that would have done so was<\/a> defeated in this session's Texas House, which is controlled by Dade Phelan. According to Siegel, voters must remove elected politicians who favour using taxpayer dollars in this manner, such as County Judge Lina Hidalgo and the Democratic county commissioners running for reelection in 2026, since the legislature did not take action.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Moreover, In 2025, Harris County and its subsidiaries have spent approximately $160,000 on federal lobbying so far. This includes $40,000 each from the Harris County Sheriff's Office and Harris County Precinct 2.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Efforts to ban taxpayer-funded lobbying, such as Texas Senate Bill 19, have faced setbacks. While initially aiming to prohibit political subdivisions from using public funds to hire lobbyists or pay dues to lobby organisations, amendments weakened the bill, allowing nonprofit associations to continue lobbying <\/a>with taxpayer funds.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Harris County\u2019s wallet wide open for lobbyists","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harris-countys-wallet-wide-open-for-lobbyists","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:43:29","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:43:29","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7886","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7878,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-29 13:25:54","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-29 13:25:54","post_content":"\n According to Politico and O'Dwyer, the Panama Maritime Authority (AMP) has agreed to a six-month contract with Checkmate Government Interactions, a US company associated with Trump, to help with interactions with US officials and the Trump administration<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Reports state that the deal started in May and that the AMP would pay a cost of $195,000 each month for six months. Although the Panama Maritime Authority, which is in charge of managing Panama's vast maritime registry and ports, has previously engaged a number of US corporations for lobbying, this is the first time the Panamanian government has done so.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The AMP is run by Checkmate managing partner Ches McDowell, who is reportedly close to Donald Trump Jr., along with partners Fritz Vaughan and Ryan O'Dwyer. Thanks to its connections to Trump, the lobbying tactic from North Carolina has lately spread to Washington.<\/p>\n\n\n\n President Donald Trump has frequently denounced what he considers to be undue Chinese influence over the Panama Canal, focusing in particular on the<\/a> Hong Kong-based corporation CK Hutchison Holdings' control of the ports of Balboa and Cristobal. Asserting that the canal was first constructed by the United States and that \"we didn\u2019t give it to China, we gave it to Panama, and we\u2019re taking it back,\" Trump asserted in his inaugural speech that \"China is operating the Panama Canal\" and that the United States would \"take it back.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n Trump's rhetoric escalated with threats to demand the return of the canal to U.S. control if Panama did not treat American shippers fairly, referencing the 1977 treaty that transferred control to Panama in 1999. He suggested that if the treaty's principles were not respected, the U.S. would reclaim the canal \"quickly and without question,\" a stance firmly rejected by Panama's president, who emphasized Panama's sovereign control over the canal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth recently visited Panama and signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to strengthen military cooperation and support for the Panama Canal security. Through training, rotating U.S. troop deployments, and collaboration to counter Chinese influence in the area, this pact seeks to enhance cooperative security operations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n China's increasing influence in Panama, particularly through the Belt and Road Initiative and CK Hutchison's port activities, was seen as a strategic danger by the Trump administration. To offset China's influence, the U.S. responded by promoting American investments, closely examining concessions held by China, and pursuing diplomatic initiatives. In order to improve bilateral relations and allay worries about China's involvement in the canal's operations, Secretary of State Marco Rubio held discussions with Panama.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Panama turns to U.S. lobbyists to deal with Trump\u2019s canal threats","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"panama-turns-to-u-s-lobbyists-to-deal-with-trumps-canal-threats","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7878","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":8},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
There have been attempts to pass federal legislation on autonomous vehicles, such as a 2017 House bill allowing 100,000 AVs on public roads, but the Senate never voted on it. Recently, a new bill called the Autonomous Vehicle Acceleration Act was introduced on May 15, 2025, aiming to create a basic federal framework for AVs. Musk and his team are actively lobbying Congress to fast-track this bill or introduce a more comprehensive one before the July 4 recess.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Musk has frequently emphasised that Tesla\u2019s future value hinges on AI, robotics, and autonomous driving. Tesla\u2019s upcoming launch of a robotaxi service in Austin, Texas, scheduled for June 12, 2025, exemplifies this strategic focus. This service depends on regulatory approval and a clear federal framework to operate at scale.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Elon Musk is lobbying to influence lawmakers on self-driving vehicle legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"elon-musk-is-lobbying-to-influence-lawmakers-on-self-driving-vehicle-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:57:08","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:57:08","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7893","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7886,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-29 13:36:41","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-29 13:36:41","post_content":"\n It has been disclosed that since 2023, up to $5.5 million has been put aside by several Harris County departments and agencies to fund lobbying activities, as the county's budget war rages on.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Harris County Metropolitan Transit Authority, the County Attorney's Office, and even the Commissioners Court itself have paid up to hundreds of thousands of dollars for lobbying operations, according to statistics from Transparency USA and OpenSecrets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The use of taxpayer funds for lobbying has been a contentious issue in Texas politics. Critics argue that taxpayer-funded lobbying often lacks transparency and may push for policies contrary to citizens\u2019 interests, such as higher taxes or increased spending. A survey by the Texas Public Policy Foundation found that 81% of Texans oppose taxpayer-funded lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The fact that there is almost no accountability for this money is among the worst aspects of it all. Cindy Siegel, the Harris County GOP Chair, discussed this with KTRH and stated, <\/p>\n\n\n\n \"We harris County has lacked transparency regarding taxpayer spending in recent years dollars.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n She also said that, like many citizen activists, government representatives ought to invest their own time and resources in promoting legislation that matters to them. She asked, <\/p>\n\n\n\n \"Why should we permit our elected officials to use taxpayer funds in this manner to lobby other officials?\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n According to Siegel, this has been a major concern among Texans for a number of years, and the Texas GOP platform presently calls for the elimination of taxpayer-funded lobbying. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Regretfully, a bill that would have done so was<\/a> defeated in this session's Texas House, which is controlled by Dade Phelan. According to Siegel, voters must remove elected politicians who favour using taxpayer dollars in this manner, such as County Judge Lina Hidalgo and the Democratic county commissioners running for reelection in 2026, since the legislature did not take action.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Moreover, In 2025, Harris County and its subsidiaries have spent approximately $160,000 on federal lobbying so far. This includes $40,000 each from the Harris County Sheriff's Office and Harris County Precinct 2.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Efforts to ban taxpayer-funded lobbying, such as Texas Senate Bill 19, have faced setbacks. While initially aiming to prohibit political subdivisions from using public funds to hire lobbyists or pay dues to lobby organisations, amendments weakened the bill, allowing nonprofit associations to continue lobbying <\/a>with taxpayer funds.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Harris County\u2019s wallet wide open for lobbyists","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harris-countys-wallet-wide-open-for-lobbyists","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:43:29","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:43:29","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7886","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7878,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-29 13:25:54","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-29 13:25:54","post_content":"\n According to Politico and O'Dwyer, the Panama Maritime Authority (AMP) has agreed to a six-month contract with Checkmate Government Interactions, a US company associated with Trump, to help with interactions with US officials and the Trump administration<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Reports state that the deal started in May and that the AMP would pay a cost of $195,000 each month for six months. Although the Panama Maritime Authority, which is in charge of managing Panama's vast maritime registry and ports, has previously engaged a number of US corporations for lobbying, this is the first time the Panamanian government has done so.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The AMP is run by Checkmate managing partner Ches McDowell, who is reportedly close to Donald Trump Jr., along with partners Fritz Vaughan and Ryan O'Dwyer. Thanks to its connections to Trump, the lobbying tactic from North Carolina has lately spread to Washington.<\/p>\n\n\n\n President Donald Trump has frequently denounced what he considers to be undue Chinese influence over the Panama Canal, focusing in particular on the<\/a> Hong Kong-based corporation CK Hutchison Holdings' control of the ports of Balboa and Cristobal. Asserting that the canal was first constructed by the United States and that \"we didn\u2019t give it to China, we gave it to Panama, and we\u2019re taking it back,\" Trump asserted in his inaugural speech that \"China is operating the Panama Canal\" and that the United States would \"take it back.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n Trump's rhetoric escalated with threats to demand the return of the canal to U.S. control if Panama did not treat American shippers fairly, referencing the 1977 treaty that transferred control to Panama in 1999. He suggested that if the treaty's principles were not respected, the U.S. would reclaim the canal \"quickly and without question,\" a stance firmly rejected by Panama's president, who emphasized Panama's sovereign control over the canal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth recently visited Panama and signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to strengthen military cooperation and support for the Panama Canal security. Through training, rotating U.S. troop deployments, and collaboration to counter Chinese influence in the area, this pact seeks to enhance cooperative security operations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n China's increasing influence in Panama, particularly through the Belt and Road Initiative and CK Hutchison's port activities, was seen as a strategic danger by the Trump administration. To offset China's influence, the U.S. responded by promoting American investments, closely examining concessions held by China, and pursuing diplomatic initiatives. In order to improve bilateral relations and allay worries about China's involvement in the canal's operations, Secretary of State Marco Rubio held discussions with Panama.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Panama turns to U.S. lobbyists to deal with Trump\u2019s canal threats","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"panama-turns-to-u-s-lobbyists-to-deal-with-trumps-canal-threats","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7878","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":8},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
Tesla\u2019s founder has placed a large wager on robots, AI, and driverless cars for Tesla's future. He has often linked the investment and ultimate commercialisation of autonomous cars to the company's worth. Furthermore, next month, Tesla is expected to launch a small, geofenced robotaxi service in Austin, Texas. Additionally, Tesla plans to someday introduce driverless cars without pedals or steering <\/a>wheels under the Cybercab brand. However, there are currently no explicit federal regulations or standards that would let such a vehicle function on a large scale.<\/p>\n\n\n\n There have been attempts to pass federal legislation on autonomous vehicles, such as a 2017 House bill allowing 100,000 AVs on public roads, but the Senate never voted on it. Recently, a new bill called the Autonomous Vehicle Acceleration Act was introduced on May 15, 2025, aiming to create a basic federal framework for AVs. Musk and his team are actively lobbying Congress to fast-track this bill or introduce a more comprehensive one before the July 4 recess.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Musk has frequently emphasised that Tesla\u2019s future value hinges on AI, robotics, and autonomous driving. Tesla\u2019s upcoming launch of a robotaxi service in Austin, Texas, scheduled for June 12, 2025, exemplifies this strategic focus. This service depends on regulatory approval and a clear federal framework to operate at scale.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Elon Musk is lobbying to influence lawmakers on self-driving vehicle legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"elon-musk-is-lobbying-to-influence-lawmakers-on-self-driving-vehicle-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:57:08","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:57:08","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7893","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7886,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-29 13:36:41","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-29 13:36:41","post_content":"\n It has been disclosed that since 2023, up to $5.5 million has been put aside by several Harris County departments and agencies to fund lobbying activities, as the county's budget war rages on.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Harris County Metropolitan Transit Authority, the County Attorney's Office, and even the Commissioners Court itself have paid up to hundreds of thousands of dollars for lobbying operations, according to statistics from Transparency USA and OpenSecrets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The use of taxpayer funds for lobbying has been a contentious issue in Texas politics. Critics argue that taxpayer-funded lobbying often lacks transparency and may push for policies contrary to citizens\u2019 interests, such as higher taxes or increased spending. A survey by the Texas Public Policy Foundation found that 81% of Texans oppose taxpayer-funded lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The fact that there is almost no accountability for this money is among the worst aspects of it all. Cindy Siegel, the Harris County GOP Chair, discussed this with KTRH and stated, <\/p>\n\n\n\n \"We harris County has lacked transparency regarding taxpayer spending in recent years dollars.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n She also said that, like many citizen activists, government representatives ought to invest their own time and resources in promoting legislation that matters to them. She asked, <\/p>\n\n\n\n \"Why should we permit our elected officials to use taxpayer funds in this manner to lobby other officials?\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n According to Siegel, this has been a major concern among Texans for a number of years, and the Texas GOP platform presently calls for the elimination of taxpayer-funded lobbying. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Regretfully, a bill that would have done so was<\/a> defeated in this session's Texas House, which is controlled by Dade Phelan. According to Siegel, voters must remove elected politicians who favour using taxpayer dollars in this manner, such as County Judge Lina Hidalgo and the Democratic county commissioners running for reelection in 2026, since the legislature did not take action.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Moreover, In 2025, Harris County and its subsidiaries have spent approximately $160,000 on federal lobbying so far. This includes $40,000 each from the Harris County Sheriff's Office and Harris County Precinct 2.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Efforts to ban taxpayer-funded lobbying, such as Texas Senate Bill 19, have faced setbacks. While initially aiming to prohibit political subdivisions from using public funds to hire lobbyists or pay dues to lobby organisations, amendments weakened the bill, allowing nonprofit associations to continue lobbying <\/a>with taxpayer funds.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Harris County\u2019s wallet wide open for lobbyists","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harris-countys-wallet-wide-open-for-lobbyists","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:43:29","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:43:29","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7886","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7878,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-29 13:25:54","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-29 13:25:54","post_content":"\n According to Politico and O'Dwyer, the Panama Maritime Authority (AMP) has agreed to a six-month contract with Checkmate Government Interactions, a US company associated with Trump, to help with interactions with US officials and the Trump administration<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Reports state that the deal started in May and that the AMP would pay a cost of $195,000 each month for six months. Although the Panama Maritime Authority, which is in charge of managing Panama's vast maritime registry and ports, has previously engaged a number of US corporations for lobbying, this is the first time the Panamanian government has done so.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The AMP is run by Checkmate managing partner Ches McDowell, who is reportedly close to Donald Trump Jr., along with partners Fritz Vaughan and Ryan O'Dwyer. Thanks to its connections to Trump, the lobbying tactic from North Carolina has lately spread to Washington.<\/p>\n\n\n\n President Donald Trump has frequently denounced what he considers to be undue Chinese influence over the Panama Canal, focusing in particular on the<\/a> Hong Kong-based corporation CK Hutchison Holdings' control of the ports of Balboa and Cristobal. Asserting that the canal was first constructed by the United States and that \"we didn\u2019t give it to China, we gave it to Panama, and we\u2019re taking it back,\" Trump asserted in his inaugural speech that \"China is operating the Panama Canal\" and that the United States would \"take it back.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n Trump's rhetoric escalated with threats to demand the return of the canal to U.S. control if Panama did not treat American shippers fairly, referencing the 1977 treaty that transferred control to Panama in 1999. He suggested that if the treaty's principles were not respected, the U.S. would reclaim the canal \"quickly and without question,\" a stance firmly rejected by Panama's president, who emphasized Panama's sovereign control over the canal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth recently visited Panama and signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to strengthen military cooperation and support for the Panama Canal security. Through training, rotating U.S. troop deployments, and collaboration to counter Chinese influence in the area, this pact seeks to enhance cooperative security operations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n China's increasing influence in Panama, particularly through the Belt and Road Initiative and CK Hutchison's port activities, was seen as a strategic danger by the Trump administration. To offset China's influence, the U.S. responded by promoting American investments, closely examining concessions held by China, and pursuing diplomatic initiatives. In order to improve bilateral relations and allay worries about China's involvement in the canal's operations, Secretary of State Marco Rubio held discussions with Panama.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Panama turns to U.S. lobbyists to deal with Trump\u2019s canal threats","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"panama-turns-to-u-s-lobbyists-to-deal-with-trumps-canal-threats","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7878","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":8},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
According to Bloomberg, Musk and those close to him have been phoning members of Congress personally. His efforts seem to be focused on the Autonomous Vehicle Acceleration Act, a law that was presented on May 15.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Tesla\u2019s founder has placed a large wager on robots, AI, and driverless cars for Tesla's future. He has often linked the investment and ultimate commercialisation of autonomous cars to the company's worth. Furthermore, next month, Tesla is expected to launch a small, geofenced robotaxi service in Austin, Texas. Additionally, Tesla plans to someday introduce driverless cars without pedals or steering <\/a>wheels under the Cybercab brand. However, there are currently no explicit federal regulations or standards that would let such a vehicle function on a large scale.<\/p>\n\n\n\n There have been attempts to pass federal legislation on autonomous vehicles, such as a 2017 House bill allowing 100,000 AVs on public roads, but the Senate never voted on it. Recently, a new bill called the Autonomous Vehicle Acceleration Act was introduced on May 15, 2025, aiming to create a basic federal framework for AVs. Musk and his team are actively lobbying Congress to fast-track this bill or introduce a more comprehensive one before the July 4 recess.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Musk has frequently emphasised that Tesla\u2019s future value hinges on AI, robotics, and autonomous driving. Tesla\u2019s upcoming launch of a robotaxi service in Austin, Texas, scheduled for June 12, 2025, exemplifies this strategic focus. This service depends on regulatory approval and a clear federal framework to operate at scale.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Elon Musk is lobbying to influence lawmakers on self-driving vehicle legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"elon-musk-is-lobbying-to-influence-lawmakers-on-self-driving-vehicle-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:57:08","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:57:08","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7893","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7886,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-29 13:36:41","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-29 13:36:41","post_content":"\n It has been disclosed that since 2023, up to $5.5 million has been put aside by several Harris County departments and agencies to fund lobbying activities, as the county's budget war rages on.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Harris County Metropolitan Transit Authority, the County Attorney's Office, and even the Commissioners Court itself have paid up to hundreds of thousands of dollars for lobbying operations, according to statistics from Transparency USA and OpenSecrets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The use of taxpayer funds for lobbying has been a contentious issue in Texas politics. Critics argue that taxpayer-funded lobbying often lacks transparency and may push for policies contrary to citizens\u2019 interests, such as higher taxes or increased spending. A survey by the Texas Public Policy Foundation found that 81% of Texans oppose taxpayer-funded lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The fact that there is almost no accountability for this money is among the worst aspects of it all. Cindy Siegel, the Harris County GOP Chair, discussed this with KTRH and stated, <\/p>\n\n\n\n \"We harris County has lacked transparency regarding taxpayer spending in recent years dollars.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n She also said that, like many citizen activists, government representatives ought to invest their own time and resources in promoting legislation that matters to them. She asked, <\/p>\n\n\n\n \"Why should we permit our elected officials to use taxpayer funds in this manner to lobby other officials?\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n According to Siegel, this has been a major concern among Texans for a number of years, and the Texas GOP platform presently calls for the elimination of taxpayer-funded lobbying. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Regretfully, a bill that would have done so was<\/a> defeated in this session's Texas House, which is controlled by Dade Phelan. According to Siegel, voters must remove elected politicians who favour using taxpayer dollars in this manner, such as County Judge Lina Hidalgo and the Democratic county commissioners running for reelection in 2026, since the legislature did not take action.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Moreover, In 2025, Harris County and its subsidiaries have spent approximately $160,000 on federal lobbying so far. This includes $40,000 each from the Harris County Sheriff's Office and Harris County Precinct 2.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Efforts to ban taxpayer-funded lobbying, such as Texas Senate Bill 19, have faced setbacks. While initially aiming to prohibit political subdivisions from using public funds to hire lobbyists or pay dues to lobby organisations, amendments weakened the bill, allowing nonprofit associations to continue lobbying <\/a>with taxpayer funds.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Harris County\u2019s wallet wide open for lobbyists","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harris-countys-wallet-wide-open-for-lobbyists","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:43:29","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:43:29","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7886","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7878,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-29 13:25:54","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-29 13:25:54","post_content":"\n According to Politico and O'Dwyer, the Panama Maritime Authority (AMP) has agreed to a six-month contract with Checkmate Government Interactions, a US company associated with Trump, to help with interactions with US officials and the Trump administration<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Reports state that the deal started in May and that the AMP would pay a cost of $195,000 each month for six months. Although the Panama Maritime Authority, which is in charge of managing Panama's vast maritime registry and ports, has previously engaged a number of US corporations for lobbying, this is the first time the Panamanian government has done so.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The AMP is run by Checkmate managing partner Ches McDowell, who is reportedly close to Donald Trump Jr., along with partners Fritz Vaughan and Ryan O'Dwyer. Thanks to its connections to Trump, the lobbying tactic from North Carolina has lately spread to Washington.<\/p>\n\n\n\n President Donald Trump has frequently denounced what he considers to be undue Chinese influence over the Panama Canal, focusing in particular on the<\/a> Hong Kong-based corporation CK Hutchison Holdings' control of the ports of Balboa and Cristobal. Asserting that the canal was first constructed by the United States and that \"we didn\u2019t give it to China, we gave it to Panama, and we\u2019re taking it back,\" Trump asserted in his inaugural speech that \"China is operating the Panama Canal\" and that the United States would \"take it back.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n Trump's rhetoric escalated with threats to demand the return of the canal to U.S. control if Panama did not treat American shippers fairly, referencing the 1977 treaty that transferred control to Panama in 1999. He suggested that if the treaty's principles were not respected, the U.S. would reclaim the canal \"quickly and without question,\" a stance firmly rejected by Panama's president, who emphasized Panama's sovereign control over the canal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth recently visited Panama and signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to strengthen military cooperation and support for the Panama Canal security. Through training, rotating U.S. troop deployments, and collaboration to counter Chinese influence in the area, this pact seeks to enhance cooperative security operations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n China's increasing influence in Panama, particularly through the Belt and Road Initiative and CK Hutchison's port activities, was seen as a strategic danger by the Trump administration. To offset China's influence, the U.S. responded by promoting American investments, closely examining concessions held by China, and pursuing diplomatic initiatives. In order to improve bilateral relations and allay worries about China's involvement in the canal's operations, Secretary of State Marco Rubio held discussions with Panama.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Panama turns to U.S. lobbyists to deal with Trump\u2019s canal threats","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"panama-turns-to-u-s-lobbyists-to-deal-with-trumps-canal-threats","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7878","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":8},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
Autonomous vehicle regulation in the U.S. is currently fragmented, with states largely controlling rules on their roads. This patchwork complicates Tesla\u2019s ability to deploy autonomous technology widely. Industry experts note that federal agencies, including the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), have sometimes slowed progress due to regulatory caution and lack of clear standards.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to Bloomberg, Musk and those close to him have been phoning members of Congress personally. His efforts seem to be focused on the Autonomous Vehicle Acceleration Act, a law that was presented on May 15.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Tesla\u2019s founder has placed a large wager on robots, AI, and driverless cars for Tesla's future. He has often linked the investment and ultimate commercialisation of autonomous cars to the company's worth. Furthermore, next month, Tesla is expected to launch a small, geofenced robotaxi service in Austin, Texas. Additionally, Tesla plans to someday introduce driverless cars without pedals or steering <\/a>wheels under the Cybercab brand. However, there are currently no explicit federal regulations or standards that would let such a vehicle function on a large scale.<\/p>\n\n\n\n There have been attempts to pass federal legislation on autonomous vehicles, such as a 2017 House bill allowing 100,000 AVs on public roads, but the Senate never voted on it. Recently, a new bill called the Autonomous Vehicle Acceleration Act was introduced on May 15, 2025, aiming to create a basic federal framework for AVs. Musk and his team are actively lobbying Congress to fast-track this bill or introduce a more comprehensive one before the July 4 recess.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Musk has frequently emphasised that Tesla\u2019s future value hinges on AI, robotics, and autonomous driving. Tesla\u2019s upcoming launch of a robotaxi service in Austin, Texas, scheduled for June 12, 2025, exemplifies this strategic focus. This service depends on regulatory approval and a clear federal framework to operate at scale.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Elon Musk is lobbying to influence lawmakers on self-driving vehicle legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"elon-musk-is-lobbying-to-influence-lawmakers-on-self-driving-vehicle-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:57:08","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:57:08","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7893","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7886,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-29 13:36:41","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-29 13:36:41","post_content":"\n It has been disclosed that since 2023, up to $5.5 million has been put aside by several Harris County departments and agencies to fund lobbying activities, as the county's budget war rages on.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Harris County Metropolitan Transit Authority, the County Attorney's Office, and even the Commissioners Court itself have paid up to hundreds of thousands of dollars for lobbying operations, according to statistics from Transparency USA and OpenSecrets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The use of taxpayer funds for lobbying has been a contentious issue in Texas politics. Critics argue that taxpayer-funded lobbying often lacks transparency and may push for policies contrary to citizens\u2019 interests, such as higher taxes or increased spending. A survey by the Texas Public Policy Foundation found that 81% of Texans oppose taxpayer-funded lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The fact that there is almost no accountability for this money is among the worst aspects of it all. Cindy Siegel, the Harris County GOP Chair, discussed this with KTRH and stated, <\/p>\n\n\n\n \"We harris County has lacked transparency regarding taxpayer spending in recent years dollars.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n She also said that, like many citizen activists, government representatives ought to invest their own time and resources in promoting legislation that matters to them. She asked, <\/p>\n\n\n\n \"Why should we permit our elected officials to use taxpayer funds in this manner to lobby other officials?\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n According to Siegel, this has been a major concern among Texans for a number of years, and the Texas GOP platform presently calls for the elimination of taxpayer-funded lobbying. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Regretfully, a bill that would have done so was<\/a> defeated in this session's Texas House, which is controlled by Dade Phelan. According to Siegel, voters must remove elected politicians who favour using taxpayer dollars in this manner, such as County Judge Lina Hidalgo and the Democratic county commissioners running for reelection in 2026, since the legislature did not take action.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Moreover, In 2025, Harris County and its subsidiaries have spent approximately $160,000 on federal lobbying so far. This includes $40,000 each from the Harris County Sheriff's Office and Harris County Precinct 2.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Efforts to ban taxpayer-funded lobbying, such as Texas Senate Bill 19, have faced setbacks. While initially aiming to prohibit political subdivisions from using public funds to hire lobbyists or pay dues to lobby organisations, amendments weakened the bill, allowing nonprofit associations to continue lobbying <\/a>with taxpayer funds.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Harris County\u2019s wallet wide open for lobbyists","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harris-countys-wallet-wide-open-for-lobbyists","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:43:29","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:43:29","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7886","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7878,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-29 13:25:54","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-29 13:25:54","post_content":"\n According to Politico and O'Dwyer, the Panama Maritime Authority (AMP) has agreed to a six-month contract with Checkmate Government Interactions, a US company associated with Trump, to help with interactions with US officials and the Trump administration<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Reports state that the deal started in May and that the AMP would pay a cost of $195,000 each month for six months. Although the Panama Maritime Authority, which is in charge of managing Panama's vast maritime registry and ports, has previously engaged a number of US corporations for lobbying, this is the first time the Panamanian government has done so.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The AMP is run by Checkmate managing partner Ches McDowell, who is reportedly close to Donald Trump Jr., along with partners Fritz Vaughan and Ryan O'Dwyer. Thanks to its connections to Trump, the lobbying tactic from North Carolina has lately spread to Washington.<\/p>\n\n\n\n President Donald Trump has frequently denounced what he considers to be undue Chinese influence over the Panama Canal, focusing in particular on the<\/a> Hong Kong-based corporation CK Hutchison Holdings' control of the ports of Balboa and Cristobal. Asserting that the canal was first constructed by the United States and that \"we didn\u2019t give it to China, we gave it to Panama, and we\u2019re taking it back,\" Trump asserted in his inaugural speech that \"China is operating the Panama Canal\" and that the United States would \"take it back.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n Trump's rhetoric escalated with threats to demand the return of the canal to U.S. control if Panama did not treat American shippers fairly, referencing the 1977 treaty that transferred control to Panama in 1999. He suggested that if the treaty's principles were not respected, the U.S. would reclaim the canal \"quickly and without question,\" a stance firmly rejected by Panama's president, who emphasized Panama's sovereign control over the canal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth recently visited Panama and signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to strengthen military cooperation and support for the Panama Canal security. Through training, rotating U.S. troop deployments, and collaboration to counter Chinese influence in the area, this pact seeks to enhance cooperative security operations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n China's increasing influence in Panama, particularly through the Belt and Road Initiative and CK Hutchison's port activities, was seen as a strategic danger by the Trump administration. To offset China's influence, the U.S. responded by promoting American investments, closely examining concessions held by China, and pursuing diplomatic initiatives. In order to improve bilateral relations and allay worries about China's involvement in the canal's operations, Secretary of State Marco Rubio held discussions with Panama.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Panama turns to U.S. lobbyists to deal with Trump\u2019s canal threats","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"panama-turns-to-u-s-lobbyists-to-deal-with-trumps-canal-threats","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7878","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":8},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
When Tesla <\/a>first introduced Autopilot in 2014, a driver-assistance system that set the stage for more sophisticated autonomous capabilities, the company started its path into self-driving technology in 2013. Elon Musk envisioned a future where cars could drive independently without human intervention, aiming eventually for fully autonomous vehicles without steering wheels or pedals, such as Tesla\u2019s planned Cybercabs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Autonomous vehicle regulation in the U.S. is currently fragmented, with states largely controlling rules on their roads. This patchwork complicates Tesla\u2019s ability to deploy autonomous technology widely. Industry experts note that federal agencies, including the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), have sometimes slowed progress due to regulatory caution and lack of clear standards.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to Bloomberg, Musk and those close to him have been phoning members of Congress personally. His efforts seem to be focused on the Autonomous Vehicle Acceleration Act, a law that was presented on May 15.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Tesla\u2019s founder has placed a large wager on robots, AI, and driverless cars for Tesla's future. He has often linked the investment and ultimate commercialisation of autonomous cars to the company's worth. Furthermore, next month, Tesla is expected to launch a small, geofenced robotaxi service in Austin, Texas. Additionally, Tesla plans to someday introduce driverless cars without pedals or steering <\/a>wheels under the Cybercab brand. However, there are currently no explicit federal regulations or standards that would let such a vehicle function on a large scale.<\/p>\n\n\n\n There have been attempts to pass federal legislation on autonomous vehicles, such as a 2017 House bill allowing 100,000 AVs on public roads, but the Senate never voted on it. Recently, a new bill called the Autonomous Vehicle Acceleration Act was introduced on May 15, 2025, aiming to create a basic federal framework for AVs. Musk and his team are actively lobbying Congress to fast-track this bill or introduce a more comprehensive one before the July 4 recess.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Musk has frequently emphasised that Tesla\u2019s future value hinges on AI, robotics, and autonomous driving. Tesla\u2019s upcoming launch of a robotaxi service in Austin, Texas, scheduled for June 12, 2025, exemplifies this strategic focus. This service depends on regulatory approval and a clear federal framework to operate at scale.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Elon Musk is lobbying to influence lawmakers on self-driving vehicle legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"elon-musk-is-lobbying-to-influence-lawmakers-on-self-driving-vehicle-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:57:08","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:57:08","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7893","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7886,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-29 13:36:41","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-29 13:36:41","post_content":"\n It has been disclosed that since 2023, up to $5.5 million has been put aside by several Harris County departments and agencies to fund lobbying activities, as the county's budget war rages on.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Harris County Metropolitan Transit Authority, the County Attorney's Office, and even the Commissioners Court itself have paid up to hundreds of thousands of dollars for lobbying operations, according to statistics from Transparency USA and OpenSecrets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The use of taxpayer funds for lobbying has been a contentious issue in Texas politics. Critics argue that taxpayer-funded lobbying often lacks transparency and may push for policies contrary to citizens\u2019 interests, such as higher taxes or increased spending. A survey by the Texas Public Policy Foundation found that 81% of Texans oppose taxpayer-funded lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The fact that there is almost no accountability for this money is among the worst aspects of it all. Cindy Siegel, the Harris County GOP Chair, discussed this with KTRH and stated, <\/p>\n\n\n\n \"We harris County has lacked transparency regarding taxpayer spending in recent years dollars.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n She also said that, like many citizen activists, government representatives ought to invest their own time and resources in promoting legislation that matters to them. She asked, <\/p>\n\n\n\n \"Why should we permit our elected officials to use taxpayer funds in this manner to lobby other officials?\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n According to Siegel, this has been a major concern among Texans for a number of years, and the Texas GOP platform presently calls for the elimination of taxpayer-funded lobbying. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Regretfully, a bill that would have done so was<\/a> defeated in this session's Texas House, which is controlled by Dade Phelan. According to Siegel, voters must remove elected politicians who favour using taxpayer dollars in this manner, such as County Judge Lina Hidalgo and the Democratic county commissioners running for reelection in 2026, since the legislature did not take action.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Moreover, In 2025, Harris County and its subsidiaries have spent approximately $160,000 on federal lobbying so far. This includes $40,000 each from the Harris County Sheriff's Office and Harris County Precinct 2.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Efforts to ban taxpayer-funded lobbying, such as Texas Senate Bill 19, have faced setbacks. While initially aiming to prohibit political subdivisions from using public funds to hire lobbyists or pay dues to lobby organisations, amendments weakened the bill, allowing nonprofit associations to continue lobbying <\/a>with taxpayer funds.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Harris County\u2019s wallet wide open for lobbyists","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harris-countys-wallet-wide-open-for-lobbyists","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:43:29","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:43:29","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7886","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7878,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-29 13:25:54","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-29 13:25:54","post_content":"\n According to Politico and O'Dwyer, the Panama Maritime Authority (AMP) has agreed to a six-month contract with Checkmate Government Interactions, a US company associated with Trump, to help with interactions with US officials and the Trump administration<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Reports state that the deal started in May and that the AMP would pay a cost of $195,000 each month for six months. Although the Panama Maritime Authority, which is in charge of managing Panama's vast maritime registry and ports, has previously engaged a number of US corporations for lobbying, this is the first time the Panamanian government has done so.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The AMP is run by Checkmate managing partner Ches McDowell, who is reportedly close to Donald Trump Jr., along with partners Fritz Vaughan and Ryan O'Dwyer. Thanks to its connections to Trump, the lobbying tactic from North Carolina has lately spread to Washington.<\/p>\n\n\n\n President Donald Trump has frequently denounced what he considers to be undue Chinese influence over the Panama Canal, focusing in particular on the<\/a> Hong Kong-based corporation CK Hutchison Holdings' control of the ports of Balboa and Cristobal. Asserting that the canal was first constructed by the United States and that \"we didn\u2019t give it to China, we gave it to Panama, and we\u2019re taking it back,\" Trump asserted in his inaugural speech that \"China is operating the Panama Canal\" and that the United States would \"take it back.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n Trump's rhetoric escalated with threats to demand the return of the canal to U.S. control if Panama did not treat American shippers fairly, referencing the 1977 treaty that transferred control to Panama in 1999. He suggested that if the treaty's principles were not respected, the U.S. would reclaim the canal \"quickly and without question,\" a stance firmly rejected by Panama's president, who emphasized Panama's sovereign control over the canal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth recently visited Panama and signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to strengthen military cooperation and support for the Panama Canal security. Through training, rotating U.S. troop deployments, and collaboration to counter Chinese influence in the area, this pact seeks to enhance cooperative security operations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n China's increasing influence in Panama, particularly through the Belt and Road Initiative and CK Hutchison's port activities, was seen as a strategic danger by the Trump administration. To offset China's influence, the U.S. responded by promoting American investments, closely examining concessions held by China, and pursuing diplomatic initiatives. In order to improve bilateral relations and allay worries about China's involvement in the canal's operations, Secretary of State Marco Rubio held discussions with Panama.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Panama turns to U.S. lobbyists to deal with Trump\u2019s canal threats","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"panama-turns-to-u-s-lobbyists-to-deal-with-trumps-canal-threats","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7878","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":8},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
Although Elon Musk is no longer President Trump's adviser and head of the Department of Government Efficiency, he is still involved in D.C. circles. Bloomberg reported, citing anonymous sources, that he is now on the opposing side, pushing politicians on laws pertaining to autonomous cars.<\/p>\n\n\n\n When Tesla <\/a>first introduced Autopilot in 2014, a driver-assistance system that set the stage for more sophisticated autonomous capabilities, the company started its path into self-driving technology in 2013. Elon Musk envisioned a future where cars could drive independently without human intervention, aiming eventually for fully autonomous vehicles without steering wheels or pedals, such as Tesla\u2019s planned Cybercabs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Autonomous vehicle regulation in the U.S. is currently fragmented, with states largely controlling rules on their roads. This patchwork complicates Tesla\u2019s ability to deploy autonomous technology widely. Industry experts note that federal agencies, including the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), have sometimes slowed progress due to regulatory caution and lack of clear standards.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to Bloomberg, Musk and those close to him have been phoning members of Congress personally. His efforts seem to be focused on the Autonomous Vehicle Acceleration Act, a law that was presented on May 15.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Tesla\u2019s founder has placed a large wager on robots, AI, and driverless cars for Tesla's future. He has often linked the investment and ultimate commercialisation of autonomous cars to the company's worth. Furthermore, next month, Tesla is expected to launch a small, geofenced robotaxi service in Austin, Texas. Additionally, Tesla plans to someday introduce driverless cars without pedals or steering <\/a>wheels under the Cybercab brand. However, there are currently no explicit federal regulations or standards that would let such a vehicle function on a large scale.<\/p>\n\n\n\n There have been attempts to pass federal legislation on autonomous vehicles, such as a 2017 House bill allowing 100,000 AVs on public roads, but the Senate never voted on it. Recently, a new bill called the Autonomous Vehicle Acceleration Act was introduced on May 15, 2025, aiming to create a basic federal framework for AVs. Musk and his team are actively lobbying Congress to fast-track this bill or introduce a more comprehensive one before the July 4 recess.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Musk has frequently emphasised that Tesla\u2019s future value hinges on AI, robotics, and autonomous driving. Tesla\u2019s upcoming launch of a robotaxi service in Austin, Texas, scheduled for June 12, 2025, exemplifies this strategic focus. This service depends on regulatory approval and a clear federal framework to operate at scale.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Elon Musk is lobbying to influence lawmakers on self-driving vehicle legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"elon-musk-is-lobbying-to-influence-lawmakers-on-self-driving-vehicle-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:57:08","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:57:08","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7893","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7886,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-29 13:36:41","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-29 13:36:41","post_content":"\n It has been disclosed that since 2023, up to $5.5 million has been put aside by several Harris County departments and agencies to fund lobbying activities, as the county's budget war rages on.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Harris County Metropolitan Transit Authority, the County Attorney's Office, and even the Commissioners Court itself have paid up to hundreds of thousands of dollars for lobbying operations, according to statistics from Transparency USA and OpenSecrets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The use of taxpayer funds for lobbying has been a contentious issue in Texas politics. Critics argue that taxpayer-funded lobbying often lacks transparency and may push for policies contrary to citizens\u2019 interests, such as higher taxes or increased spending. A survey by the Texas Public Policy Foundation found that 81% of Texans oppose taxpayer-funded lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The fact that there is almost no accountability for this money is among the worst aspects of it all. Cindy Siegel, the Harris County GOP Chair, discussed this with KTRH and stated, <\/p>\n\n\n\n \"We harris County has lacked transparency regarding taxpayer spending in recent years dollars.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n She also said that, like many citizen activists, government representatives ought to invest their own time and resources in promoting legislation that matters to them. She asked, <\/p>\n\n\n\n \"Why should we permit our elected officials to use taxpayer funds in this manner to lobby other officials?\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n According to Siegel, this has been a major concern among Texans for a number of years, and the Texas GOP platform presently calls for the elimination of taxpayer-funded lobbying. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Regretfully, a bill that would have done so was<\/a> defeated in this session's Texas House, which is controlled by Dade Phelan. According to Siegel, voters must remove elected politicians who favour using taxpayer dollars in this manner, such as County Judge Lina Hidalgo and the Democratic county commissioners running for reelection in 2026, since the legislature did not take action.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Moreover, In 2025, Harris County and its subsidiaries have spent approximately $160,000 on federal lobbying so far. This includes $40,000 each from the Harris County Sheriff's Office and Harris County Precinct 2.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Efforts to ban taxpayer-funded lobbying, such as Texas Senate Bill 19, have faced setbacks. While initially aiming to prohibit political subdivisions from using public funds to hire lobbyists or pay dues to lobby organisations, amendments weakened the bill, allowing nonprofit associations to continue lobbying <\/a>with taxpayer funds.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Harris County\u2019s wallet wide open for lobbyists","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harris-countys-wallet-wide-open-for-lobbyists","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:43:29","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:43:29","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7886","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7878,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-29 13:25:54","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-29 13:25:54","post_content":"\n According to Politico and O'Dwyer, the Panama Maritime Authority (AMP) has agreed to a six-month contract with Checkmate Government Interactions, a US company associated with Trump, to help with interactions with US officials and the Trump administration<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Reports state that the deal started in May and that the AMP would pay a cost of $195,000 each month for six months. Although the Panama Maritime Authority, which is in charge of managing Panama's vast maritime registry and ports, has previously engaged a number of US corporations for lobbying, this is the first time the Panamanian government has done so.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The AMP is run by Checkmate managing partner Ches McDowell, who is reportedly close to Donald Trump Jr., along with partners Fritz Vaughan and Ryan O'Dwyer. Thanks to its connections to Trump, the lobbying tactic from North Carolina has lately spread to Washington.<\/p>\n\n\n\n President Donald Trump has frequently denounced what he considers to be undue Chinese influence over the Panama Canal, focusing in particular on the<\/a> Hong Kong-based corporation CK Hutchison Holdings' control of the ports of Balboa and Cristobal. Asserting that the canal was first constructed by the United States and that \"we didn\u2019t give it to China, we gave it to Panama, and we\u2019re taking it back,\" Trump asserted in his inaugural speech that \"China is operating the Panama Canal\" and that the United States would \"take it back.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n Trump's rhetoric escalated with threats to demand the return of the canal to U.S. control if Panama did not treat American shippers fairly, referencing the 1977 treaty that transferred control to Panama in 1999. He suggested that if the treaty's principles were not respected, the U.S. would reclaim the canal \"quickly and without question,\" a stance firmly rejected by Panama's president, who emphasized Panama's sovereign control over the canal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth recently visited Panama and signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to strengthen military cooperation and support for the Panama Canal security. Through training, rotating U.S. troop deployments, and collaboration to counter Chinese influence in the area, this pact seeks to enhance cooperative security operations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n China's increasing influence in Panama, particularly through the Belt and Road Initiative and CK Hutchison's port activities, was seen as a strategic danger by the Trump administration. To offset China's influence, the U.S. responded by promoting American investments, closely examining concessions held by China, and pursuing diplomatic initiatives. In order to improve bilateral relations and allay worries about China's involvement in the canal's operations, Secretary of State Marco Rubio held discussions with Panama.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Panama turns to U.S. lobbyists to deal with Trump\u2019s canal threats","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"panama-turns-to-u-s-lobbyists-to-deal-with-trumps-canal-threats","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7878","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":8},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
The matter is obviously a top priority for Putin's government, even if he has claimed that Western sanctions presumably strengthen Russia. At least some sanctions might be lifted as part of a planned peace pact on Ukraine, according to Reuters. In the meantime, internal pressure on US President Donald Trump over Russia sanctions is increasing, according to Reuters. According to the agency, he could be forced to make them stronger.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Russian elites funnel millions into U.S. lobbying to challenge sanctions tied to Ukraine war","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"russian-elites-funnel-millions-into-u-s-lobbying-to-challenge-sanctions-tied-to-ukraine-war","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 14:15:04","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 14:15:04","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7900","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7893,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-30 13:51:05","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-30 13:51:05","post_content":"\n Although Elon Musk is no longer President Trump's adviser and head of the Department of Government Efficiency, he is still involved in D.C. circles. Bloomberg reported, citing anonymous sources, that he is now on the opposing side, pushing politicians on laws pertaining to autonomous cars.<\/p>\n\n\n\n When Tesla <\/a>first introduced Autopilot in 2014, a driver-assistance system that set the stage for more sophisticated autonomous capabilities, the company started its path into self-driving technology in 2013. Elon Musk envisioned a future where cars could drive independently without human intervention, aiming eventually for fully autonomous vehicles without steering wheels or pedals, such as Tesla\u2019s planned Cybercabs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Autonomous vehicle regulation in the U.S. is currently fragmented, with states largely controlling rules on their roads. This patchwork complicates Tesla\u2019s ability to deploy autonomous technology widely. Industry experts note that federal agencies, including the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), have sometimes slowed progress due to regulatory caution and lack of clear standards.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to Bloomberg, Musk and those close to him have been phoning members of Congress personally. His efforts seem to be focused on the Autonomous Vehicle Acceleration Act, a law that was presented on May 15.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Tesla\u2019s founder has placed a large wager on robots, AI, and driverless cars for Tesla's future. He has often linked the investment and ultimate commercialisation of autonomous cars to the company's worth. Furthermore, next month, Tesla is expected to launch a small, geofenced robotaxi service in Austin, Texas. Additionally, Tesla plans to someday introduce driverless cars without pedals or steering <\/a>wheels under the Cybercab brand. However, there are currently no explicit federal regulations or standards that would let such a vehicle function on a large scale.<\/p>\n\n\n\n There have been attempts to pass federal legislation on autonomous vehicles, such as a 2017 House bill allowing 100,000 AVs on public roads, but the Senate never voted on it. Recently, a new bill called the Autonomous Vehicle Acceleration Act was introduced on May 15, 2025, aiming to create a basic federal framework for AVs. Musk and his team are actively lobbying Congress to fast-track this bill or introduce a more comprehensive one before the July 4 recess.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Musk has frequently emphasised that Tesla\u2019s future value hinges on AI, robotics, and autonomous driving. Tesla\u2019s upcoming launch of a robotaxi service in Austin, Texas, scheduled for June 12, 2025, exemplifies this strategic focus. This service depends on regulatory approval and a clear federal framework to operate at scale.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Elon Musk is lobbying to influence lawmakers on self-driving vehicle legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"elon-musk-is-lobbying-to-influence-lawmakers-on-self-driving-vehicle-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:57:08","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:57:08","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7893","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7886,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-29 13:36:41","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-29 13:36:41","post_content":"\n It has been disclosed that since 2023, up to $5.5 million has been put aside by several Harris County departments and agencies to fund lobbying activities, as the county's budget war rages on.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Harris County Metropolitan Transit Authority, the County Attorney's Office, and even the Commissioners Court itself have paid up to hundreds of thousands of dollars for lobbying operations, according to statistics from Transparency USA and OpenSecrets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The use of taxpayer funds for lobbying has been a contentious issue in Texas politics. Critics argue that taxpayer-funded lobbying often lacks transparency and may push for policies contrary to citizens\u2019 interests, such as higher taxes or increased spending. A survey by the Texas Public Policy Foundation found that 81% of Texans oppose taxpayer-funded lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The fact that there is almost no accountability for this money is among the worst aspects of it all. Cindy Siegel, the Harris County GOP Chair, discussed this with KTRH and stated, <\/p>\n\n\n\n \"We harris County has lacked transparency regarding taxpayer spending in recent years dollars.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n She also said that, like many citizen activists, government representatives ought to invest their own time and resources in promoting legislation that matters to them. She asked, <\/p>\n\n\n\n \"Why should we permit our elected officials to use taxpayer funds in this manner to lobby other officials?\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n According to Siegel, this has been a major concern among Texans for a number of years, and the Texas GOP platform presently calls for the elimination of taxpayer-funded lobbying. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Regretfully, a bill that would have done so was<\/a> defeated in this session's Texas House, which is controlled by Dade Phelan. According to Siegel, voters must remove elected politicians who favour using taxpayer dollars in this manner, such as County Judge Lina Hidalgo and the Democratic county commissioners running for reelection in 2026, since the legislature did not take action.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Moreover, In 2025, Harris County and its subsidiaries have spent approximately $160,000 on federal lobbying so far. This includes $40,000 each from the Harris County Sheriff's Office and Harris County Precinct 2.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Efforts to ban taxpayer-funded lobbying, such as Texas Senate Bill 19, have faced setbacks. While initially aiming to prohibit political subdivisions from using public funds to hire lobbyists or pay dues to lobby organisations, amendments weakened the bill, allowing nonprofit associations to continue lobbying <\/a>with taxpayer funds.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Harris County\u2019s wallet wide open for lobbyists","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harris-countys-wallet-wide-open-for-lobbyists","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:43:29","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:43:29","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7886","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7878,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-29 13:25:54","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-29 13:25:54","post_content":"\n According to Politico and O'Dwyer, the Panama Maritime Authority (AMP) has agreed to a six-month contract with Checkmate Government Interactions, a US company associated with Trump, to help with interactions with US officials and the Trump administration<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Reports state that the deal started in May and that the AMP would pay a cost of $195,000 each month for six months. Although the Panama Maritime Authority, which is in charge of managing Panama's vast maritime registry and ports, has previously engaged a number of US corporations for lobbying, this is the first time the Panamanian government has done so.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The AMP is run by Checkmate managing partner Ches McDowell, who is reportedly close to Donald Trump Jr., along with partners Fritz Vaughan and Ryan O'Dwyer. Thanks to its connections to Trump, the lobbying tactic from North Carolina has lately spread to Washington.<\/p>\n\n\n\n President Donald Trump has frequently denounced what he considers to be undue Chinese influence over the Panama Canal, focusing in particular on the<\/a> Hong Kong-based corporation CK Hutchison Holdings' control of the ports of Balboa and Cristobal. Asserting that the canal was first constructed by the United States and that \"we didn\u2019t give it to China, we gave it to Panama, and we\u2019re taking it back,\" Trump asserted in his inaugural speech that \"China is operating the Panama Canal\" and that the United States would \"take it back.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n Trump's rhetoric escalated with threats to demand the return of the canal to U.S. control if Panama did not treat American shippers fairly, referencing the 1977 treaty that transferred control to Panama in 1999. He suggested that if the treaty's principles were not respected, the U.S. would reclaim the canal \"quickly and without question,\" a stance firmly rejected by Panama's president, who emphasized Panama's sovereign control over the canal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth recently visited Panama and signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to strengthen military cooperation and support for the Panama Canal security. Through training, rotating U.S. troop deployments, and collaboration to counter Chinese influence in the area, this pact seeks to enhance cooperative security operations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n China's increasing influence in Panama, particularly through the Belt and Road Initiative and CK Hutchison's port activities, was seen as a strategic danger by the Trump administration. To offset China's influence, the U.S. responded by promoting American investments, closely examining concessions held by China, and pursuing diplomatic initiatives. In order to improve bilateral relations and allay worries about China's involvement in the canal's operations, Secretary of State Marco Rubio held discussions with Panama.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Panama turns to U.S. lobbyists to deal with Trump\u2019s canal threats","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"panama-turns-to-u-s-lobbyists-to-deal-with-trumps-canal-threats","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7878","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":8},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
The lobbying company Sonoran Policy Group (Stryk Global Diplomacy) is also a party to the arrangement. Supporting initiatives to review and lift the sanctions is its declared objective. According to the documents, Chemezov and Brovko are expressly asking for the<\/a> personal sanctions on them to be lifted.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The matter is obviously a top priority for Putin's government, even if he has claimed that Western sanctions presumably strengthen Russia. At least some sanctions might be lifted as part of a planned peace pact on Ukraine, according to Reuters. In the meantime, internal pressure on US President Donald Trump over Russia sanctions is increasing, according to Reuters. According to the agency, he could be forced to make them stronger.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Russian elites funnel millions into U.S. lobbying to challenge sanctions tied to Ukraine war","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"russian-elites-funnel-millions-into-u-s-lobbying-to-challenge-sanctions-tied-to-ukraine-war","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 14:15:04","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 14:15:04","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7900","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7893,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-30 13:51:05","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-30 13:51:05","post_content":"\n Although Elon Musk is no longer President Trump's adviser and head of the Department of Government Efficiency, he is still involved in D.C. circles. Bloomberg reported, citing anonymous sources, that he is now on the opposing side, pushing politicians on laws pertaining to autonomous cars.<\/p>\n\n\n\n When Tesla <\/a>first introduced Autopilot in 2014, a driver-assistance system that set the stage for more sophisticated autonomous capabilities, the company started its path into self-driving technology in 2013. Elon Musk envisioned a future where cars could drive independently without human intervention, aiming eventually for fully autonomous vehicles without steering wheels or pedals, such as Tesla\u2019s planned Cybercabs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Autonomous vehicle regulation in the U.S. is currently fragmented, with states largely controlling rules on their roads. This patchwork complicates Tesla\u2019s ability to deploy autonomous technology widely. Industry experts note that federal agencies, including the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), have sometimes slowed progress due to regulatory caution and lack of clear standards.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to Bloomberg, Musk and those close to him have been phoning members of Congress personally. His efforts seem to be focused on the Autonomous Vehicle Acceleration Act, a law that was presented on May 15.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Tesla\u2019s founder has placed a large wager on robots, AI, and driverless cars for Tesla's future. He has often linked the investment and ultimate commercialisation of autonomous cars to the company's worth. Furthermore, next month, Tesla is expected to launch a small, geofenced robotaxi service in Austin, Texas. Additionally, Tesla plans to someday introduce driverless cars without pedals or steering <\/a>wheels under the Cybercab brand. However, there are currently no explicit federal regulations or standards that would let such a vehicle function on a large scale.<\/p>\n\n\n\n There have been attempts to pass federal legislation on autonomous vehicles, such as a 2017 House bill allowing 100,000 AVs on public roads, but the Senate never voted on it. Recently, a new bill called the Autonomous Vehicle Acceleration Act was introduced on May 15, 2025, aiming to create a basic federal framework for AVs. Musk and his team are actively lobbying Congress to fast-track this bill or introduce a more comprehensive one before the July 4 recess.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Musk has frequently emphasised that Tesla\u2019s future value hinges on AI, robotics, and autonomous driving. Tesla\u2019s upcoming launch of a robotaxi service in Austin, Texas, scheduled for June 12, 2025, exemplifies this strategic focus. This service depends on regulatory approval and a clear federal framework to operate at scale.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Elon Musk is lobbying to influence lawmakers on self-driving vehicle legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"elon-musk-is-lobbying-to-influence-lawmakers-on-self-driving-vehicle-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:57:08","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:57:08","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7893","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7886,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-29 13:36:41","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-29 13:36:41","post_content":"\n It has been disclosed that since 2023, up to $5.5 million has been put aside by several Harris County departments and agencies to fund lobbying activities, as the county's budget war rages on.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Harris County Metropolitan Transit Authority, the County Attorney's Office, and even the Commissioners Court itself have paid up to hundreds of thousands of dollars for lobbying operations, according to statistics from Transparency USA and OpenSecrets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The use of taxpayer funds for lobbying has been a contentious issue in Texas politics. Critics argue that taxpayer-funded lobbying often lacks transparency and may push for policies contrary to citizens\u2019 interests, such as higher taxes or increased spending. A survey by the Texas Public Policy Foundation found that 81% of Texans oppose taxpayer-funded lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The fact that there is almost no accountability for this money is among the worst aspects of it all. Cindy Siegel, the Harris County GOP Chair, discussed this with KTRH and stated, <\/p>\n\n\n\n \"We harris County has lacked transparency regarding taxpayer spending in recent years dollars.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n She also said that, like many citizen activists, government representatives ought to invest their own time and resources in promoting legislation that matters to them. She asked, <\/p>\n\n\n\n \"Why should we permit our elected officials to use taxpayer funds in this manner to lobby other officials?\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n According to Siegel, this has been a major concern among Texans for a number of years, and the Texas GOP platform presently calls for the elimination of taxpayer-funded lobbying. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Regretfully, a bill that would have done so was<\/a> defeated in this session's Texas House, which is controlled by Dade Phelan. According to Siegel, voters must remove elected politicians who favour using taxpayer dollars in this manner, such as County Judge Lina Hidalgo and the Democratic county commissioners running for reelection in 2026, since the legislature did not take action.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Moreover, In 2025, Harris County and its subsidiaries have spent approximately $160,000 on federal lobbying so far. This includes $40,000 each from the Harris County Sheriff's Office and Harris County Precinct 2.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Efforts to ban taxpayer-funded lobbying, such as Texas Senate Bill 19, have faced setbacks. While initially aiming to prohibit political subdivisions from using public funds to hire lobbyists or pay dues to lobby organisations, amendments weakened the bill, allowing nonprofit associations to continue lobbying <\/a>with taxpayer funds.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Harris County\u2019s wallet wide open for lobbyists","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harris-countys-wallet-wide-open-for-lobbyists","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:43:29","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:43:29","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7886","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7878,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-29 13:25:54","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-29 13:25:54","post_content":"\n According to Politico and O'Dwyer, the Panama Maritime Authority (AMP) has agreed to a six-month contract with Checkmate Government Interactions, a US company associated with Trump, to help with interactions with US officials and the Trump administration<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Reports state that the deal started in May and that the AMP would pay a cost of $195,000 each month for six months. Although the Panama Maritime Authority, which is in charge of managing Panama's vast maritime registry and ports, has previously engaged a number of US corporations for lobbying, this is the first time the Panamanian government has done so.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The AMP is run by Checkmate managing partner Ches McDowell, who is reportedly close to Donald Trump Jr., along with partners Fritz Vaughan and Ryan O'Dwyer. Thanks to its connections to Trump, the lobbying tactic from North Carolina has lately spread to Washington.<\/p>\n\n\n\n President Donald Trump has frequently denounced what he considers to be undue Chinese influence over the Panama Canal, focusing in particular on the<\/a> Hong Kong-based corporation CK Hutchison Holdings' control of the ports of Balboa and Cristobal. Asserting that the canal was first constructed by the United States and that \"we didn\u2019t give it to China, we gave it to Panama, and we\u2019re taking it back,\" Trump asserted in his inaugural speech that \"China is operating the Panama Canal\" and that the United States would \"take it back.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n Trump's rhetoric escalated with threats to demand the return of the canal to U.S. control if Panama did not treat American shippers fairly, referencing the 1977 treaty that transferred control to Panama in 1999. He suggested that if the treaty's principles were not respected, the U.S. would reclaim the canal \"quickly and without question,\" a stance firmly rejected by Panama's president, who emphasized Panama's sovereign control over the canal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth recently visited Panama and signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to strengthen military cooperation and support for the Panama Canal security. Through training, rotating U.S. troop deployments, and collaboration to counter Chinese influence in the area, this pact seeks to enhance cooperative security operations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n China's increasing influence in Panama, particularly through the Belt and Road Initiative and CK Hutchison's port activities, was seen as a strategic danger by the Trump administration. To offset China's influence, the U.S. responded by promoting American investments, closely examining concessions held by China, and pursuing diplomatic initiatives. In order to improve bilateral relations and allay worries about China's involvement in the canal's operations, Secretary of State Marco Rubio held discussions with Panama.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Panama turns to U.S. lobbyists to deal with Trump\u2019s canal threats","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"panama-turns-to-u-s-lobbyists-to-deal-with-trumps-canal-threats","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:29:57","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7878","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":8},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
Data from the US Department of Justice's official website, which posts disclosures about foreign agents, supports Livingston's claims. There, RBC-Ukraine discovered a number of agreements between Rathmell Short LLP, which would represent their interests in the US, and Sergey Chemezov and his advisor Vasily Brovko.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The lobbying company Sonoran Policy Group (Stryk Global Diplomacy) is also a party to the arrangement. Supporting initiatives to review and lift the sanctions is its declared objective. According to the documents, Chemezov and Brovko are expressly asking for the<\/a> personal sanctions on them to be lifted.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The matter is obviously a top priority for Putin's government, even if he has claimed that Western sanctions presumably strengthen Russia. At least some sanctions might be lifted as part of a planned peace pact on Ukraine, according to Reuters. In the meantime, internal pressure on US President Donald Trump over Russia sanctions is increasing, according to Reuters. According to the agency, he could be forced to make them stronger.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Russian elites funnel millions into U.S. lobbying to challenge sanctions tied to Ukraine war","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"russian-elites-funnel-millions-into-u-s-lobbying-to-challenge-sanctions-tied-to-ukraine-war","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 14:15:04","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 14:15:04","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7900","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7893,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-30 13:51:05","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-30 13:51:05","post_content":"\n Although Elon Musk is no longer President Trump's adviser and head of the Department of Government Efficiency, he is still involved in D.C. circles. Bloomberg reported, citing anonymous sources, that he is now on the opposing side, pushing politicians on laws pertaining to autonomous cars.<\/p>\n\n\n\n When Tesla <\/a>first introduced Autopilot in 2014, a driver-assistance system that set the stage for more sophisticated autonomous capabilities, the company started its path into self-driving technology in 2013. Elon Musk envisioned a future where cars could drive independently without human intervention, aiming eventually for fully autonomous vehicles without steering wheels or pedals, such as Tesla\u2019s planned Cybercabs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Autonomous vehicle regulation in the U.S. is currently fragmented, with states largely controlling rules on their roads. This patchwork complicates Tesla\u2019s ability to deploy autonomous technology widely. Industry experts note that federal agencies, including the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), have sometimes slowed progress due to regulatory caution and lack of clear standards.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to Bloomberg, Musk and those close to him have been phoning members of Congress personally. His efforts seem to be focused on the Autonomous Vehicle Acceleration Act, a law that was presented on May 15.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Tesla\u2019s founder has placed a large wager on robots, AI, and driverless cars for Tesla's future. He has often linked the investment and ultimate commercialisation of autonomous cars to the company's worth. Furthermore, next month, Tesla is expected to launch a small, geofenced robotaxi service in Austin, Texas. Additionally, Tesla plans to someday introduce driverless cars without pedals or steering <\/a>wheels under the Cybercab brand. However, there are currently no explicit federal regulations or standards that would let such a vehicle function on a large scale.<\/p>\n\n\n\n There have been attempts to pass federal legislation on autonomous vehicles, such as a 2017 House bill allowing 100,000 AVs on public roads, but the Senate never voted on it. Recently, a new bill called the Autonomous Vehicle Acceleration Act was introduced on May 15, 2025, aiming to create a basic federal framework for AVs. Musk and his team are actively lobbying Congress to fast-track this bill or introduce a more comprehensive one before the July 4 recess.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Musk has frequently emphasised that Tesla\u2019s future value hinges on AI, robotics, and autonomous driving. Tesla\u2019s upcoming launch of a robotaxi service in Austin, Texas, scheduled for June 12, 2025, exemplifies this strategic focus. This service depends on regulatory approval and a clear federal framework to operate at scale.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Elon Musk is lobbying to influence lawmakers on self-driving vehicle legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"elon-musk-is-lobbying-to-influence-lawmakers-on-self-driving-vehicle-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:57:08","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:57:08","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7893","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7886,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-29 13:36:41","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-29 13:36:41","post_content":"\n It has been disclosed that since 2023, up to $5.5 million has been put aside by several Harris County departments and agencies to fund lobbying activities, as the county's budget war rages on.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Harris County Metropolitan Transit Authority, the County Attorney's Office, and even the Commissioners Court itself have paid up to hundreds of thousands of dollars for lobbying operations, according to statistics from Transparency USA and OpenSecrets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The use of taxpayer funds for lobbying has been a contentious issue in Texas politics. Critics argue that taxpayer-funded lobbying often lacks transparency and may push for policies contrary to citizens\u2019 interests, such as higher taxes or increased spending. A survey by the Texas Public Policy Foundation found that 81% of Texans oppose taxpayer-funded lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The fact that there is almost no accountability for this money is among the worst aspects of it all. Cindy Siegel, the Harris County GOP Chair, discussed this with KTRH and stated, <\/p>\n\n\n\n \"We harris County has lacked transparency regarding taxpayer spending in recent years dollars.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n She also said that, like many citizen activists, government representatives ought to invest their own time and resources in promoting legislation that matters to them. She asked, <\/p>\n\n\n\n \"Why should we permit our elected officials to use taxpayer funds in this manner to lobby other officials?\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n According to Siegel, this has been a major concern among Texans for a number of years, and the Texas GOP platform presently calls for the elimination of taxpayer-funded lobbying. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Regretfully, a bill that would have done so was<\/a> defeated in this session's Texas House, which is controlled by Dade Phelan. According to Siegel, voters must remove elected politicians who favour using taxpayer dollars in this manner, such as County Judge Lina Hidalgo and the Democratic county commissioners running for reelection in 2026, since the legislature did not take action.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Moreover, In 2025, Harris County and its subsidiaries have spent approximately $160,000 on federal lobbying so far. This includes $40,000 each from the Harris County Sheriff's Office and Harris County Precinct 2.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Efforts to ban taxpayer-funded lobbying, such as Texas Senate Bill 19, have faced setbacks. While initially aiming to prohibit political subdivisions from using public funds to hire lobbyists or pay dues to lobby organisations, amendments weakened the bill, allowing nonprofit associations to continue lobbying <\/a>with taxpayer funds.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Harris County\u2019s wallet wide open for lobbyists","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harris-countys-wallet-wide-open-for-lobbyists","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 13:43:29","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 13:43:29","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7886","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7878,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-29 13:25:54","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-29 13:25:54","post_content":"\n According to Politico and O'Dwyer, the Panama Maritime Authority (AMP) has agreed to a six-month contract with Checkmate Government Interactions, a US company associated with Trump, to help with interactions with US officials and the Trump administration<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Reports state that the deal started in May and that the AMP would pay a cost of $195,000 each month for six months. Although the Panama Maritime Authority, which is in charge of managing Panama's vast maritime registry and ports, has previously engaged a number of US corporations for lobbying, this is the first time the Panamanian government has done so.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The AMP is run by Checkmate managing partner Ches McDowell, who is reportedly close to Donald Trump Jr., along with partners Fritz Vaughan and Ryan O'Dwyer. Thanks to its connections to Trump, the lobbying tactic from North Carolina has lately spread to Washington.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n