\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

Page 44 of 72 1 43 44 45 72
\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

Page 44 of 72 1 43 44 45 72
\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Starbuck indicated he's counseled some agency leaders as they seek to meet a White House directive to name DEI \"worst offenders.\" But he indicated he wouldn't work for the administration, and cited a number of places where he differs with its policies, including expediting the bird flu vaccine (he ran against mandates regarding masking and the Covid-19 vaccine) and the administration's attack on free speech in the name of combating censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

His advances often begin with a LinkedIn message to the CEO, and he said he treats seriously the non-disclosure contracts he signs with companies in order to permit honest discussions. How honest? \"I can't tell you how many times I've had [CEOs] say, 'No way, we're not going to do that\u2026 and then, 'Oh, crap, we're going to do that.'\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated he's counseled some agency leaders as they seek to meet a White House directive to name DEI \"worst offenders.\" But he indicated he wouldn't work for the administration, and cited a number of places where he differs with its policies, including expediting the bird flu vaccine (he ran against mandates regarding masking and the Covid-19 vaccine) and the administration's attack on free speech in the name of combating censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

he states \u2014 and far-right celebrities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His advances often begin with a LinkedIn message to the CEO, and he said he treats seriously the non-disclosure contracts he signs with companies in order to permit honest discussions. How honest? \"I can't tell you how many times I've had [CEOs] say, 'No way, we're not going to do that\u2026 and then, 'Oh, crap, we're going to do that.'\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated he's counseled some agency leaders as they seek to meet a White House directive to name DEI \"worst offenders.\" But he indicated he wouldn't work for the administration, and cited a number of places where he differs with its policies, including expediting the bird flu vaccine (he ran against mandates regarding masking and the Covid-19 vaccine) and the administration's attack on free speech in the name of combating censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

\"I get along well with Elon,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he states \u2014 and far-right celebrities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His advances often begin with a LinkedIn message to the CEO, and he said he treats seriously the non-disclosure contracts he signs with companies in order to permit honest discussions. How honest? \"I can't tell you how many times I've had [CEOs] say, 'No way, we're not going to do that\u2026 and then, 'Oh, crap, we're going to do that.'\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated he's counseled some agency leaders as they seek to meet a White House directive to name DEI \"worst offenders.\" But he indicated he wouldn't work for the administration, and cited a number of places where he differs with its policies, including expediting the bird flu vaccine (he ran against mandates regarding masking and the Covid-19 vaccine) and the administration's attack on free speech in the name of combating censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n
\n

\"I get along well with Elon,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he states \u2014 and far-right celebrities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His advances often begin with a LinkedIn message to the CEO, and he said he treats seriously the non-disclosure contracts he signs with companies in order to permit honest discussions. How honest? \"I can't tell you how many times I've had [CEOs] say, 'No way, we're not going to do that\u2026 and then, 'Oh, crap, we're going to do that.'\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated he's counseled some agency leaders as they seek to meet a White House directive to name DEI \"worst offenders.\" But he indicated he wouldn't work for the administration, and cited a number of places where he differs with its policies, including expediting the bird flu vaccine (he ran against mandates regarding masking and the Covid-19 vaccine) and the administration's attack on free speech in the name of combating censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

In an extensive interview on his Tennessee farm, Starbuck looked back at his campaign, which started around X last year and has subsequently pushed huge overhauls in at least more than a dozen firms with a total market capitalization of over $2 trillion. His efforts are precise and his reach has been propagated by individuals such as Elon Musk<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I get along well with Elon,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he states \u2014 and far-right celebrities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His advances often begin with a LinkedIn message to the CEO, and he said he treats seriously the non-disclosure contracts he signs with companies in order to permit honest discussions. How honest? \"I can't tell you how many times I've had [CEOs] say, 'No way, we're not going to do that\u2026 and then, 'Oh, crap, we're going to do that.'\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated he's counseled some agency leaders as they seek to meet a White House directive to name DEI \"worst offenders.\" But he indicated he wouldn't work for the administration, and cited a number of places where he differs with its policies, including expediting the bird flu vaccine (he ran against mandates regarding masking and the Covid-19 vaccine) and the administration's attack on free speech in the name of combating censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Starbuck said he has gotten a \u201cblank check\u201d offer from at least one big Republican donor. \u201cThe catch is: they want the ability to kill stories\u201d \u2014 Starbuck said he considers himself a journalist \u2014 \u201cand pick targets. And I just don\u2019t work that way.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In an extensive interview on his Tennessee farm, Starbuck looked back at his campaign, which started around X last year and has subsequently pushed huge overhauls in at least more than a dozen firms with a total market capitalization of over $2 trillion. His efforts are precise and his reach has been propagated by individuals such as Elon Musk<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I get along well with Elon,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he states \u2014 and far-right celebrities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His advances often begin with a LinkedIn message to the CEO, and he said he treats seriously the non-disclosure contracts he signs with companies in order to permit honest discussions. How honest? \"I can't tell you how many times I've had [CEOs] say, 'No way, we're not going to do that\u2026 and then, 'Oh, crap, we're going to do that.'\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated he's counseled some agency leaders as they seek to meet a White House directive to name DEI \"worst offenders.\" But he indicated he wouldn't work for the administration, and cited a number of places where he differs with its policies, including expediting the bird flu vaccine (he ran against mandates regarding masking and the Covid-19 vaccine) and the administration's attack on free speech in the name of combating censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Robby Starbuck, labeled a boardroom boogeyman for pushing companies like Walmart, Lowe\u2019s, and Harley-Davidson to drop their DEI initiatives, informed Semafor about his intention to establish a lobbying group \u201cto make sure this never occurs again.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck said he has gotten a \u201cblank check\u201d offer from at least one big Republican donor. \u201cThe catch is: they want the ability to kill stories\u201d \u2014 Starbuck said he considers himself a journalist \u2014 \u201cand pick targets. And I just don\u2019t work that way.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In an extensive interview on his Tennessee farm, Starbuck looked back at his campaign, which started around X last year and has subsequently pushed huge overhauls in at least more than a dozen firms with a total market capitalization of over $2 trillion. His efforts are precise and his reach has been propagated by individuals such as Elon Musk<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I get along well with Elon,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he states \u2014 and far-right celebrities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His advances often begin with a LinkedIn message to the CEO, and he said he treats seriously the non-disclosure contracts he signs with companies in order to permit honest discussions. How honest? \"I can't tell you how many times I've had [CEOs] say, 'No way, we're not going to do that\u2026 and then, 'Oh, crap, we're going to do that.'\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated he's counseled some agency leaders as they seek to meet a White House directive to name DEI \"worst offenders.\" But he indicated he wouldn't work for the administration, and cited a number of places where he differs with its policies, including expediting the bird flu vaccine (he ran against mandates regarding masking and the Covid-19 vaccine) and the administration's attack on free speech in the name of combating censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Corporate America\u2019s strongest opponent is initiating a lobbying group focused on \u201clong-term corporate oversight\u201d of diversity policies in companies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robby Starbuck, labeled a boardroom boogeyman for pushing companies like Walmart, Lowe\u2019s, and Harley-Davidson to drop their DEI initiatives, informed Semafor about his intention to establish a lobbying group \u201cto make sure this never occurs again.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck said he has gotten a \u201cblank check\u201d offer from at least one big Republican donor. \u201cThe catch is: they want the ability to kill stories\u201d \u2014 Starbuck said he considers himself a journalist \u2014 \u201cand pick targets. And I just don\u2019t work that way.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In an extensive interview on his Tennessee farm, Starbuck looked back at his campaign, which started around X last year and has subsequently pushed huge overhauls in at least more than a dozen firms with a total market capitalization of over $2 trillion. His efforts are precise and his reach has been propagated by individuals such as Elon Musk<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I get along well with Elon,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he states \u2014 and far-right celebrities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His advances often begin with a LinkedIn message to the CEO, and he said he treats seriously the non-disclosure contracts he signs with companies in order to permit honest discussions. How honest? \"I can't tell you how many times I've had [CEOs] say, 'No way, we're not going to do that\u2026 and then, 'Oh, crap, we're going to do that.'\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated he's counseled some agency leaders as they seek to meet a White House directive to name DEI \"worst offenders.\" But he indicated he wouldn't work for the administration, and cited a number of places where he differs with its policies, including expediting the bird flu vaccine (he ran against mandates regarding masking and the Covid-19 vaccine) and the administration's attack on free speech in the name of combating censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

\"We ought not to have hypocrisy as an institution that is all about being honest.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Harvard faces pressure to drop fossil fuel-linked lobbying firm","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harvard-faces-pressure-to-drop-fossil-fuel-linked-lobbying-firm","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7554","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7561,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_content":"\n

Corporate America\u2019s strongest opponent is initiating a lobbying group focused on \u201clong-term corporate oversight\u201d of diversity policies in companies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robby Starbuck, labeled a boardroom boogeyman for pushing companies like Walmart, Lowe\u2019s, and Harley-Davidson to drop their DEI initiatives, informed Semafor about his intention to establish a lobbying group \u201cto make sure this never occurs again.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck said he has gotten a \u201cblank check\u201d offer from at least one big Republican donor. \u201cThe catch is: they want the ability to kill stories\u201d \u2014 Starbuck said he considers himself a journalist \u2014 \u201cand pick targets. And I just don\u2019t work that way.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In an extensive interview on his Tennessee farm, Starbuck looked back at his campaign, which started around X last year and has subsequently pushed huge overhauls in at least more than a dozen firms with a total market capitalization of over $2 trillion. His efforts are precise and his reach has been propagated by individuals such as Elon Musk<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I get along well with Elon,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he states \u2014 and far-right celebrities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His advances often begin with a LinkedIn message to the CEO, and he said he treats seriously the non-disclosure contracts he signs with companies in order to permit honest discussions. How honest? \"I can't tell you how many times I've had [CEOs] say, 'No way, we're not going to do that\u2026 and then, 'Oh, crap, we're going to do that.'\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated he's counseled some agency leaders as they seek to meet a White House directive to name DEI \"worst offenders.\" But he indicated he wouldn't work for the administration, and cited a number of places where he differs with its policies, including expediting the bird flu vaccine (he ran against mandates regarding masking and the Covid-19 vaccine) and the administration's attack on free speech in the name of combating censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n
\n

\"We ought not to have hypocrisy as an institution that is all about being honest.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Harvard faces pressure to drop fossil fuel-linked lobbying firm","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harvard-faces-pressure-to-drop-fossil-fuel-linked-lobbying-firm","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7554","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7561,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_content":"\n

Corporate America\u2019s strongest opponent is initiating a lobbying group focused on \u201clong-term corporate oversight\u201d of diversity policies in companies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robby Starbuck, labeled a boardroom boogeyman for pushing companies like Walmart, Lowe\u2019s, and Harley-Davidson to drop their DEI initiatives, informed Semafor about his intention to establish a lobbying group \u201cto make sure this never occurs again.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck said he has gotten a \u201cblank check\u201d offer from at least one big Republican donor. \u201cThe catch is: they want the ability to kill stories\u201d \u2014 Starbuck said he considers himself a journalist \u2014 \u201cand pick targets. And I just don\u2019t work that way.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In an extensive interview on his Tennessee farm, Starbuck looked back at his campaign, which started around X last year and has subsequently pushed huge overhauls in at least more than a dozen firms with a total market capitalization of over $2 trillion. His efforts are precise and his reach has been propagated by individuals such as Elon Musk<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I get along well with Elon,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he states \u2014 and far-right celebrities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His advances often begin with a LinkedIn message to the CEO, and he said he treats seriously the non-disclosure contracts he signs with companies in order to permit honest discussions. How honest? \"I can't tell you how many times I've had [CEOs] say, 'No way, we're not going to do that\u2026 and then, 'Oh, crap, we're going to do that.'\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated he's counseled some agency leaders as they seek to meet a White House directive to name DEI \"worst offenders.\" But he indicated he wouldn't work for the administration, and cited a number of places where he differs with its policies, including expediting the bird flu vaccine (he ran against mandates regarding masking and the Covid-19 vaccine) and the administration's attack on free speech in the name of combating censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

he continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We ought not to have hypocrisy as an institution that is all about being honest.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Harvard faces pressure to drop fossil fuel-linked lobbying firm","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harvard-faces-pressure-to-drop-fossil-fuel-linked-lobbying-firm","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7554","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7561,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_content":"\n

Corporate America\u2019s strongest opponent is initiating a lobbying group focused on \u201clong-term corporate oversight\u201d of diversity policies in companies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robby Starbuck, labeled a boardroom boogeyman for pushing companies like Walmart, Lowe\u2019s, and Harley-Davidson to drop their DEI initiatives, informed Semafor about his intention to establish a lobbying group \u201cto make sure this never occurs again.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck said he has gotten a \u201cblank check\u201d offer from at least one big Republican donor. \u201cThe catch is: they want the ability to kill stories\u201d \u2014 Starbuck said he considers himself a journalist \u2014 \u201cand pick targets. And I just don\u2019t work that way.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In an extensive interview on his Tennessee farm, Starbuck looked back at his campaign, which started around X last year and has subsequently pushed huge overhauls in at least more than a dozen firms with a total market capitalization of over $2 trillion. His efforts are precise and his reach has been propagated by individuals such as Elon Musk<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I get along well with Elon,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he states \u2014 and far-right celebrities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His advances often begin with a LinkedIn message to the CEO, and he said he treats seriously the non-disclosure contracts he signs with companies in order to permit honest discussions. How honest? \"I can't tell you how many times I've had [CEOs] say, 'No way, we're not going to do that\u2026 and then, 'Oh, crap, we're going to do that.'\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated he's counseled some agency leaders as they seek to meet a White House directive to name DEI \"worst offenders.\" But he indicated he wouldn't work for the administration, and cited a number of places where he differs with its policies, including expediting the bird flu vaccine (he ran against mandates regarding masking and the Covid-19 vaccine) and the administration's attack on free speech in the name of combating censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

\"They're an example for not just the United States, but the world,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We ought not to have hypocrisy as an institution that is all about being honest.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Harvard faces pressure to drop fossil fuel-linked lobbying firm","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harvard-faces-pressure-to-drop-fossil-fuel-linked-lobbying-firm","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7554","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7561,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_content":"\n

Corporate America\u2019s strongest opponent is initiating a lobbying group focused on \u201clong-term corporate oversight\u201d of diversity policies in companies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robby Starbuck, labeled a boardroom boogeyman for pushing companies like Walmart, Lowe\u2019s, and Harley-Davidson to drop their DEI initiatives, informed Semafor about his intention to establish a lobbying group \u201cto make sure this never occurs again.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck said he has gotten a \u201cblank check\u201d offer from at least one big Republican donor. \u201cThe catch is: they want the ability to kill stories\u201d \u2014 Starbuck said he considers himself a journalist \u2014 \u201cand pick targets. And I just don\u2019t work that way.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In an extensive interview on his Tennessee farm, Starbuck looked back at his campaign, which started around X last year and has subsequently pushed huge overhauls in at least more than a dozen firms with a total market capitalization of over $2 trillion. His efforts are precise and his reach has been propagated by individuals such as Elon Musk<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I get along well with Elon,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he states \u2014 and far-right celebrities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His advances often begin with a LinkedIn message to the CEO, and he said he treats seriously the non-disclosure contracts he signs with companies in order to permit honest discussions. How honest? \"I can't tell you how many times I've had [CEOs] say, 'No way, we're not going to do that\u2026 and then, 'Oh, crap, we're going to do that.'\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated he's counseled some agency leaders as they seek to meet a White House directive to name DEI \"worst offenders.\" But he indicated he wouldn't work for the administration, and cited a number of places where he differs with its policies, including expediting the bird flu vaccine (he ran against mandates regarding masking and the Covid-19 vaccine) and the administration's attack on free speech in the name of combating censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n
\n

\"They're an example for not just the United States, but the world,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We ought not to have hypocrisy as an institution that is all about being honest.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Harvard faces pressure to drop fossil fuel-linked lobbying firm","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harvard-faces-pressure-to-drop-fossil-fuel-linked-lobbying-firm","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7554","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7561,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_content":"\n

Corporate America\u2019s strongest opponent is initiating a lobbying group focused on \u201clong-term corporate oversight\u201d of diversity policies in companies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robby Starbuck, labeled a boardroom boogeyman for pushing companies like Walmart, Lowe\u2019s, and Harley-Davidson to drop their DEI initiatives, informed Semafor about his intention to establish a lobbying group \u201cto make sure this never occurs again.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck said he has gotten a \u201cblank check\u201d offer from at least one big Republican donor. \u201cThe catch is: they want the ability to kill stories\u201d \u2014 Starbuck said he considers himself a journalist \u2014 \u201cand pick targets. And I just don\u2019t work that way.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In an extensive interview on his Tennessee farm, Starbuck looked back at his campaign, which started around X last year and has subsequently pushed huge overhauls in at least more than a dozen firms with a total market capitalization of over $2 trillion. His efforts are precise and his reach has been propagated by individuals such as Elon Musk<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I get along well with Elon,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he states \u2014 and far-right celebrities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His advances often begin with a LinkedIn message to the CEO, and he said he treats seriously the non-disclosure contracts he signs with companies in order to permit honest discussions. How honest? \"I can't tell you how many times I've had [CEOs] say, 'No way, we're not going to do that\u2026 and then, 'Oh, crap, we're going to do that.'\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated he's counseled some agency leaders as they seek to meet a White House directive to name DEI \"worst offenders.\" But he indicated he wouldn't work for the administration, and cited a number of places where he differs with its policies, including expediting the bird flu vaccine (he ran against mandates regarding masking and the Covid-19 vaccine) and the administration's attack on free speech in the name of combating censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Cochrane said <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're an example for not just the United States, but the world,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We ought not to have hypocrisy as an institution that is all about being honest.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Harvard faces pressure to drop fossil fuel-linked lobbying firm","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harvard-faces-pressure-to-drop-fossil-fuel-linked-lobbying-firm","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7554","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7561,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_content":"\n

Corporate America\u2019s strongest opponent is initiating a lobbying group focused on \u201clong-term corporate oversight\u201d of diversity policies in companies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robby Starbuck, labeled a boardroom boogeyman for pushing companies like Walmart, Lowe\u2019s, and Harley-Davidson to drop their DEI initiatives, informed Semafor about his intention to establish a lobbying group \u201cto make sure this never occurs again.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck said he has gotten a \u201cblank check\u201d offer from at least one big Republican donor. \u201cThe catch is: they want the ability to kill stories\u201d \u2014 Starbuck said he considers himself a journalist \u2014 \u201cand pick targets. And I just don\u2019t work that way.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In an extensive interview on his Tennessee farm, Starbuck looked back at his campaign, which started around X last year and has subsequently pushed huge overhauls in at least more than a dozen firms with a total market capitalization of over $2 trillion. His efforts are precise and his reach has been propagated by individuals such as Elon Musk<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I get along well with Elon,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he states \u2014 and far-right celebrities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His advances often begin with a LinkedIn message to the CEO, and he said he treats seriously the non-disclosure contracts he signs with companies in order to permit honest discussions. How honest? \"I can't tell you how many times I've had [CEOs] say, 'No way, we're not going to do that\u2026 and then, 'Oh, crap, we're going to do that.'\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated he's counseled some agency leaders as they seek to meet a White House directive to name DEI \"worst offenders.\" But he indicated he wouldn't work for the administration, and cited a number of places where he differs with its policies, including expediting the bird flu vaccine (he ran against mandates regarding masking and the Covid-19 vaccine) and the administration's attack on free speech in the name of combating censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

\"When you've got an institution like Harvard, say one thing and do another, I think that sends a double standard to the public and to other institutions, corporations or even academic institutions broadly in the United States,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Cochrane said <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're an example for not just the United States, but the world,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We ought not to have hypocrisy as an institution that is all about being honest.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Harvard faces pressure to drop fossil fuel-linked lobbying firm","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harvard-faces-pressure-to-drop-fossil-fuel-linked-lobbying-firm","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7554","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7561,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_content":"\n

Corporate America\u2019s strongest opponent is initiating a lobbying group focused on \u201clong-term corporate oversight\u201d of diversity policies in companies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robby Starbuck, labeled a boardroom boogeyman for pushing companies like Walmart, Lowe\u2019s, and Harley-Davidson to drop their DEI initiatives, informed Semafor about his intention to establish a lobbying group \u201cto make sure this never occurs again.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck said he has gotten a \u201cblank check\u201d offer from at least one big Republican donor. \u201cThe catch is: they want the ability to kill stories\u201d \u2014 Starbuck said he considers himself a journalist \u2014 \u201cand pick targets. And I just don\u2019t work that way.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In an extensive interview on his Tennessee farm, Starbuck looked back at his campaign, which started around X last year and has subsequently pushed huge overhauls in at least more than a dozen firms with a total market capitalization of over $2 trillion. His efforts are precise and his reach has been propagated by individuals such as Elon Musk<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I get along well with Elon,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he states \u2014 and far-right celebrities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His advances often begin with a LinkedIn message to the CEO, and he said he treats seriously the non-disclosure contracts he signs with companies in order to permit honest discussions. How honest? \"I can't tell you how many times I've had [CEOs] say, 'No way, we're not going to do that\u2026 and then, 'Oh, crap, we're going to do that.'\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated he's counseled some agency leaders as they seek to meet a White House directive to name DEI \"worst offenders.\" But he indicated he wouldn't work for the administration, and cited a number of places where he differs with its policies, including expediting the bird flu vaccine (he ran against mandates regarding masking and the Covid-19 vaccine) and the administration's attack on free speech in the name of combating censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n
\n

\"When you've got an institution like Harvard, say one thing and do another, I think that sends a double standard to the public and to other institutions, corporations or even academic institutions broadly in the United States,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Cochrane said <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're an example for not just the United States, but the world,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We ought not to have hypocrisy as an institution that is all about being honest.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Harvard faces pressure to drop fossil fuel-linked lobbying firm","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harvard-faces-pressure-to-drop-fossil-fuel-linked-lobbying-firm","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7554","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7561,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_content":"\n

Corporate America\u2019s strongest opponent is initiating a lobbying group focused on \u201clong-term corporate oversight\u201d of diversity policies in companies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robby Starbuck, labeled a boardroom boogeyman for pushing companies like Walmart, Lowe\u2019s, and Harley-Davidson to drop their DEI initiatives, informed Semafor about his intention to establish a lobbying group \u201cto make sure this never occurs again.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck said he has gotten a \u201cblank check\u201d offer from at least one big Republican donor. \u201cThe catch is: they want the ability to kill stories\u201d \u2014 Starbuck said he considers himself a journalist \u2014 \u201cand pick targets. And I just don\u2019t work that way.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In an extensive interview on his Tennessee farm, Starbuck looked back at his campaign, which started around X last year and has subsequently pushed huge overhauls in at least more than a dozen firms with a total market capitalization of over $2 trillion. His efforts are precise and his reach has been propagated by individuals such as Elon Musk<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I get along well with Elon,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he states \u2014 and far-right celebrities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His advances often begin with a LinkedIn message to the CEO, and he said he treats seriously the non-disclosure contracts he signs with companies in order to permit honest discussions. How honest? \"I can't tell you how many times I've had [CEOs] say, 'No way, we're not going to do that\u2026 and then, 'Oh, crap, we're going to do that.'\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated he's counseled some agency leaders as they seek to meet a White House directive to name DEI \"worst offenders.\" But he indicated he wouldn't work for the administration, and cited a number of places where he differs with its policies, including expediting the bird flu vaccine (he ran against mandates regarding masking and the Covid-19 vaccine) and the administration's attack on free speech in the name of combating censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Cole A. Cochrane '27, Policy Director of the Harvard Undergraduate Clean Energy Group, added that he wishes Harvard would sever its ties with Tremont Strategies to make a statement regarding their top \"interests, priorities, and principles.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"When you've got an institution like Harvard, say one thing and do another, I think that sends a double standard to the public and to other institutions, corporations or even academic institutions broadly in the United States,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Cochrane said <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're an example for not just the United States, but the world,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We ought not to have hypocrisy as an institution that is all about being honest.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Harvard faces pressure to drop fossil fuel-linked lobbying firm","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harvard-faces-pressure-to-drop-fossil-fuel-linked-lobbying-firm","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7554","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7561,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_content":"\n

Corporate America\u2019s strongest opponent is initiating a lobbying group focused on \u201clong-term corporate oversight\u201d of diversity policies in companies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robby Starbuck, labeled a boardroom boogeyman for pushing companies like Walmart, Lowe\u2019s, and Harley-Davidson to drop their DEI initiatives, informed Semafor about his intention to establish a lobbying group \u201cto make sure this never occurs again.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck said he has gotten a \u201cblank check\u201d offer from at least one big Republican donor. \u201cThe catch is: they want the ability to kill stories\u201d \u2014 Starbuck said he considers himself a journalist \u2014 \u201cand pick targets. And I just don\u2019t work that way.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In an extensive interview on his Tennessee farm, Starbuck looked back at his campaign, which started around X last year and has subsequently pushed huge overhauls in at least more than a dozen firms with a total market capitalization of over $2 trillion. His efforts are precise and his reach has been propagated by individuals such as Elon Musk<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I get along well with Elon,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he states \u2014 and far-right celebrities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His advances often begin with a LinkedIn message to the CEO, and he said he treats seriously the non-disclosure contracts he signs with companies in order to permit honest discussions. How honest? \"I can't tell you how many times I've had [CEOs] say, 'No way, we're not going to do that\u2026 and then, 'Oh, crap, we're going to do that.'\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated he's counseled some agency leaders as they seek to meet a White House directive to name DEI \"worst offenders.\" But he indicated he wouldn't work for the administration, and cited a number of places where he differs with its policies, including expediting the bird flu vaccine (he ran against mandates regarding masking and the Covid-19 vaccine) and the administration's attack on free speech in the name of combating censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

F Minus has effectively pushed universities to sever their relationships with lobbying companies previously. They pushed John Hopkins University out of its relationship with a \"coal lobbyist,\" Browning reports. But he acknowledged Harvard might be reluctant to switch lobbying companies since the I-90 project is still in planning stages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cole A. Cochrane '27, Policy Director of the Harvard Undergraduate Clean Energy Group, added that he wishes Harvard would sever its ties with Tremont Strategies to make a statement regarding their top \"interests, priorities, and principles.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"When you've got an institution like Harvard, say one thing and do another, I think that sends a double standard to the public and to other institutions, corporations or even academic institutions broadly in the United States,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Cochrane said <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're an example for not just the United States, but the world,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We ought not to have hypocrisy as an institution that is all about being honest.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Harvard faces pressure to drop fossil fuel-linked lobbying firm","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harvard-faces-pressure-to-drop-fossil-fuel-linked-lobbying-firm","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7554","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7561,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_content":"\n

Corporate America\u2019s strongest opponent is initiating a lobbying group focused on \u201clong-term corporate oversight\u201d of diversity policies in companies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robby Starbuck, labeled a boardroom boogeyman for pushing companies like Walmart, Lowe\u2019s, and Harley-Davidson to drop their DEI initiatives, informed Semafor about his intention to establish a lobbying group \u201cto make sure this never occurs again.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck said he has gotten a \u201cblank check\u201d offer from at least one big Republican donor. \u201cThe catch is: they want the ability to kill stories\u201d \u2014 Starbuck said he considers himself a journalist \u2014 \u201cand pick targets. And I just don\u2019t work that way.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In an extensive interview on his Tennessee farm, Starbuck looked back at his campaign, which started around X last year and has subsequently pushed huge overhauls in at least more than a dozen firms with a total market capitalization of over $2 trillion. His efforts are precise and his reach has been propagated by individuals such as Elon Musk<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I get along well with Elon,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he states \u2014 and far-right celebrities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His advances often begin with a LinkedIn message to the CEO, and he said he treats seriously the non-disclosure contracts he signs with companies in order to permit honest discussions. How honest? \"I can't tell you how many times I've had [CEOs] say, 'No way, we're not going to do that\u2026 and then, 'Oh, crap, we're going to do that.'\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated he's counseled some agency leaders as they seek to meet a White House directive to name DEI \"worst offenders.\" But he indicated he wouldn't work for the administration, and cited a number of places where he differs with its policies, including expediting the bird flu vaccine (he ran against mandates regarding masking and the Covid-19 vaccine) and the administration's attack on free speech in the name of combating censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Meanwhile, Harvard has made its own climate commitments. Harvard aims to be fossil fuel neutral by 2026, according to the University's Sustainability Office. Browning indicated that he thinks it's \"incompatible with Harvard's values\" to hire Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

F Minus has effectively pushed universities to sever their relationships with lobbying companies previously. They pushed John Hopkins University out of its relationship with a \"coal lobbyist,\" Browning reports. But he acknowledged Harvard might be reluctant to switch lobbying companies since the I-90 project is still in planning stages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cole A. Cochrane '27, Policy Director of the Harvard Undergraduate Clean Energy Group, added that he wishes Harvard would sever its ties with Tremont Strategies to make a statement regarding their top \"interests, priorities, and principles.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"When you've got an institution like Harvard, say one thing and do another, I think that sends a double standard to the public and to other institutions, corporations or even academic institutions broadly in the United States,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Cochrane said <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're an example for not just the United States, but the world,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We ought not to have hypocrisy as an institution that is all about being honest.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Harvard faces pressure to drop fossil fuel-linked lobbying firm","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harvard-faces-pressure-to-drop-fossil-fuel-linked-lobbying-firm","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7554","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7561,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_content":"\n

Corporate America\u2019s strongest opponent is initiating a lobbying group focused on \u201clong-term corporate oversight\u201d of diversity policies in companies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robby Starbuck, labeled a boardroom boogeyman for pushing companies like Walmart, Lowe\u2019s, and Harley-Davidson to drop their DEI initiatives, informed Semafor about his intention to establish a lobbying group \u201cto make sure this never occurs again.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck said he has gotten a \u201cblank check\u201d offer from at least one big Republican donor. \u201cThe catch is: they want the ability to kill stories\u201d \u2014 Starbuck said he considers himself a journalist \u2014 \u201cand pick targets. And I just don\u2019t work that way.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In an extensive interview on his Tennessee farm, Starbuck looked back at his campaign, which started around X last year and has subsequently pushed huge overhauls in at least more than a dozen firms with a total market capitalization of over $2 trillion. His efforts are precise and his reach has been propagated by individuals such as Elon Musk<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I get along well with Elon,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he states \u2014 and far-right celebrities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His advances often begin with a LinkedIn message to the CEO, and he said he treats seriously the non-disclosure contracts he signs with companies in order to permit honest discussions. How honest? \"I can't tell you how many times I've had [CEOs] say, 'No way, we're not going to do that\u2026 and then, 'Oh, crap, we're going to do that.'\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated he's counseled some agency leaders as they seek to meet a White House directive to name DEI \"worst offenders.\" But he indicated he wouldn't work for the administration, and cited a number of places where he differs with its policies, including expediting the bird flu vaccine (he ran against mandates regarding masking and the Covid-19 vaccine) and the administration's attack on free speech in the name of combating censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Harvard is working<\/a> in association with Tremont Strategies presently on the Allston I-90 Multimodal Project, an infrastructure development project to replace existing highway ramps with a new grid system permitting development on University-owned land.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Meanwhile, Harvard has made its own climate commitments. Harvard aims to be fossil fuel neutral by 2026, according to the University's Sustainability Office. Browning indicated that he thinks it's \"incompatible with Harvard's values\" to hire Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

F Minus has effectively pushed universities to sever their relationships with lobbying companies previously. They pushed John Hopkins University out of its relationship with a \"coal lobbyist,\" Browning reports. But he acknowledged Harvard might be reluctant to switch lobbying companies since the I-90 project is still in planning stages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cole A. Cochrane '27, Policy Director of the Harvard Undergraduate Clean Energy Group, added that he wishes Harvard would sever its ties with Tremont Strategies to make a statement regarding their top \"interests, priorities, and principles.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"When you've got an institution like Harvard, say one thing and do another, I think that sends a double standard to the public and to other institutions, corporations or even academic institutions broadly in the United States,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Cochrane said <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're an example for not just the United States, but the world,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We ought not to have hypocrisy as an institution that is all about being honest.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Harvard faces pressure to drop fossil fuel-linked lobbying firm","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harvard-faces-pressure-to-drop-fossil-fuel-linked-lobbying-firm","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7554","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7561,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_content":"\n

Corporate America\u2019s strongest opponent is initiating a lobbying group focused on \u201clong-term corporate oversight\u201d of diversity policies in companies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robby Starbuck, labeled a boardroom boogeyman for pushing companies like Walmart, Lowe\u2019s, and Harley-Davidson to drop their DEI initiatives, informed Semafor about his intention to establish a lobbying group \u201cto make sure this never occurs again.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck said he has gotten a \u201cblank check\u201d offer from at least one big Republican donor. \u201cThe catch is: they want the ability to kill stories\u201d \u2014 Starbuck said he considers himself a journalist \u2014 \u201cand pick targets. And I just don\u2019t work that way.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In an extensive interview on his Tennessee farm, Starbuck looked back at his campaign, which started around X last year and has subsequently pushed huge overhauls in at least more than a dozen firms with a total market capitalization of over $2 trillion. His efforts are precise and his reach has been propagated by individuals such as Elon Musk<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I get along well with Elon,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he states \u2014 and far-right celebrities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His advances often begin with a LinkedIn message to the CEO, and he said he treats seriously the non-disclosure contracts he signs with companies in order to permit honest discussions. How honest? \"I can't tell you how many times I've had [CEOs] say, 'No way, we're not going to do that\u2026 and then, 'Oh, crap, we're going to do that.'\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated he's counseled some agency leaders as they seek to meet a White House directive to name DEI \"worst offenders.\" But he indicated he wouldn't work for the administration, and cited a number of places where he differs with its policies, including expediting the bird flu vaccine (he ran against mandates regarding masking and the Covid-19 vaccine) and the administration's attack on free speech in the name of combating censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Harvard representative Amy Kamosa did not respond to Harvard's collaboration with Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard is working<\/a> in association with Tremont Strategies presently on the Allston I-90 Multimodal Project, an infrastructure development project to replace existing highway ramps with a new grid system permitting development on University-owned land.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Meanwhile, Harvard has made its own climate commitments. Harvard aims to be fossil fuel neutral by 2026, according to the University's Sustainability Office. Browning indicated that he thinks it's \"incompatible with Harvard's values\" to hire Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

F Minus has effectively pushed universities to sever their relationships with lobbying companies previously. They pushed John Hopkins University out of its relationship with a \"coal lobbyist,\" Browning reports. But he acknowledged Harvard might be reluctant to switch lobbying companies since the I-90 project is still in planning stages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cole A. Cochrane '27, Policy Director of the Harvard Undergraduate Clean Energy Group, added that he wishes Harvard would sever its ties with Tremont Strategies to make a statement regarding their top \"interests, priorities, and principles.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"When you've got an institution like Harvard, say one thing and do another, I think that sends a double standard to the public and to other institutions, corporations or even academic institutions broadly in the United States,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Cochrane said <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're an example for not just the United States, but the world,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We ought not to have hypocrisy as an institution that is all about being honest.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Harvard faces pressure to drop fossil fuel-linked lobbying firm","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harvard-faces-pressure-to-drop-fossil-fuel-linked-lobbying-firm","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7554","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7561,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_content":"\n

Corporate America\u2019s strongest opponent is initiating a lobbying group focused on \u201clong-term corporate oversight\u201d of diversity policies in companies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robby Starbuck, labeled a boardroom boogeyman for pushing companies like Walmart, Lowe\u2019s, and Harley-Davidson to drop their DEI initiatives, informed Semafor about his intention to establish a lobbying group \u201cto make sure this never occurs again.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck said he has gotten a \u201cblank check\u201d offer from at least one big Republican donor. \u201cThe catch is: they want the ability to kill stories\u201d \u2014 Starbuck said he considers himself a journalist \u2014 \u201cand pick targets. And I just don\u2019t work that way.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In an extensive interview on his Tennessee farm, Starbuck looked back at his campaign, which started around X last year and has subsequently pushed huge overhauls in at least more than a dozen firms with a total market capitalization of over $2 trillion. His efforts are precise and his reach has been propagated by individuals such as Elon Musk<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I get along well with Elon,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he states \u2014 and far-right celebrities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His advances often begin with a LinkedIn message to the CEO, and he said he treats seriously the non-disclosure contracts he signs with companies in order to permit honest discussions. How honest? \"I can't tell you how many times I've had [CEOs] say, 'No way, we're not going to do that\u2026 and then, 'Oh, crap, we're going to do that.'\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated he's counseled some agency leaders as they seek to meet a White House directive to name DEI \"worst offenders.\" But he indicated he wouldn't work for the administration, and cited a number of places where he differs with its policies, including expediting the bird flu vaccine (he ran against mandates regarding masking and the Covid-19 vaccine) and the administration's attack on free speech in the name of combating censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Browning stated. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard representative Amy Kamosa did not respond to Harvard's collaboration with Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard is working<\/a> in association with Tremont Strategies presently on the Allston I-90 Multimodal Project, an infrastructure development project to replace existing highway ramps with a new grid system permitting development on University-owned land.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Meanwhile, Harvard has made its own climate commitments. Harvard aims to be fossil fuel neutral by 2026, according to the University's Sustainability Office. Browning indicated that he thinks it's \"incompatible with Harvard's values\" to hire Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

F Minus has effectively pushed universities to sever their relationships with lobbying companies previously. They pushed John Hopkins University out of its relationship with a \"coal lobbyist,\" Browning reports. But he acknowledged Harvard might be reluctant to switch lobbying companies since the I-90 project is still in planning stages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cole A. Cochrane '27, Policy Director of the Harvard Undergraduate Clean Energy Group, added that he wishes Harvard would sever its ties with Tremont Strategies to make a statement regarding their top \"interests, priorities, and principles.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"When you've got an institution like Harvard, say one thing and do another, I think that sends a double standard to the public and to other institutions, corporations or even academic institutions broadly in the United States,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Cochrane said <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're an example for not just the United States, but the world,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We ought not to have hypocrisy as an institution that is all about being honest.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Harvard faces pressure to drop fossil fuel-linked lobbying firm","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harvard-faces-pressure-to-drop-fossil-fuel-linked-lobbying-firm","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7554","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7561,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_content":"\n

Corporate America\u2019s strongest opponent is initiating a lobbying group focused on \u201clong-term corporate oversight\u201d of diversity policies in companies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robby Starbuck, labeled a boardroom boogeyman for pushing companies like Walmart, Lowe\u2019s, and Harley-Davidson to drop their DEI initiatives, informed Semafor about his intention to establish a lobbying group \u201cto make sure this never occurs again.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck said he has gotten a \u201cblank check\u201d offer from at least one big Republican donor. \u201cThe catch is: they want the ability to kill stories\u201d \u2014 Starbuck said he considers himself a journalist \u2014 \u201cand pick targets. And I just don\u2019t work that way.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In an extensive interview on his Tennessee farm, Starbuck looked back at his campaign, which started around X last year and has subsequently pushed huge overhauls in at least more than a dozen firms with a total market capitalization of over $2 trillion. His efforts are precise and his reach has been propagated by individuals such as Elon Musk<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I get along well with Elon,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he states \u2014 and far-right celebrities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His advances often begin with a LinkedIn message to the CEO, and he said he treats seriously the non-disclosure contracts he signs with companies in order to permit honest discussions. How honest? \"I can't tell you how many times I've had [CEOs] say, 'No way, we're not going to do that\u2026 and then, 'Oh, crap, we're going to do that.'\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated he's counseled some agency leaders as they seek to meet a White House directive to name DEI \"worst offenders.\" But he indicated he wouldn't work for the administration, and cited a number of places where he differs with its policies, including expediting the bird flu vaccine (he ran against mandates regarding masking and the Covid-19 vaccine) and the administration's attack on free speech in the name of combating censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

\"They're kind of normalizing and empowering this company to do business with Musk and DOGE who are among the largest threats on climate in general today,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Browning stated. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard representative Amy Kamosa did not respond to Harvard's collaboration with Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard is working<\/a> in association with Tremont Strategies presently on the Allston I-90 Multimodal Project, an infrastructure development project to replace existing highway ramps with a new grid system permitting development on University-owned land.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Meanwhile, Harvard has made its own climate commitments. Harvard aims to be fossil fuel neutral by 2026, according to the University's Sustainability Office. Browning indicated that he thinks it's \"incompatible with Harvard's values\" to hire Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

F Minus has effectively pushed universities to sever their relationships with lobbying companies previously. They pushed John Hopkins University out of its relationship with a \"coal lobbyist,\" Browning reports. But he acknowledged Harvard might be reluctant to switch lobbying companies since the I-90 project is still in planning stages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cole A. Cochrane '27, Policy Director of the Harvard Undergraduate Clean Energy Group, added that he wishes Harvard would sever its ties with Tremont Strategies to make a statement regarding their top \"interests, priorities, and principles.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"When you've got an institution like Harvard, say one thing and do another, I think that sends a double standard to the public and to other institutions, corporations or even academic institutions broadly in the United States,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Cochrane said <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're an example for not just the United States, but the world,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We ought not to have hypocrisy as an institution that is all about being honest.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Harvard faces pressure to drop fossil fuel-linked lobbying firm","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harvard-faces-pressure-to-drop-fossil-fuel-linked-lobbying-firm","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7554","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7561,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_content":"\n

Corporate America\u2019s strongest opponent is initiating a lobbying group focused on \u201clong-term corporate oversight\u201d of diversity policies in companies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robby Starbuck, labeled a boardroom boogeyman for pushing companies like Walmart, Lowe\u2019s, and Harley-Davidson to drop their DEI initiatives, informed Semafor about his intention to establish a lobbying group \u201cto make sure this never occurs again.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck said he has gotten a \u201cblank check\u201d offer from at least one big Republican donor. \u201cThe catch is: they want the ability to kill stories\u201d \u2014 Starbuck said he considers himself a journalist \u2014 \u201cand pick targets. And I just don\u2019t work that way.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In an extensive interview on his Tennessee farm, Starbuck looked back at his campaign, which started around X last year and has subsequently pushed huge overhauls in at least more than a dozen firms with a total market capitalization of over $2 trillion. His efforts are precise and his reach has been propagated by individuals such as Elon Musk<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I get along well with Elon,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he states \u2014 and far-right celebrities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His advances often begin with a LinkedIn message to the CEO, and he said he treats seriously the non-disclosure contracts he signs with companies in order to permit honest discussions. How honest? \"I can't tell you how many times I've had [CEOs] say, 'No way, we're not going to do that\u2026 and then, 'Oh, crap, we're going to do that.'\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated he's counseled some agency leaders as they seek to meet a White House directive to name DEI \"worst offenders.\" But he indicated he wouldn't work for the administration, and cited a number of places where he differs with its policies, including expediting the bird flu vaccine (he ran against mandates regarding masking and the Covid-19 vaccine) and the administration's attack on free speech in the name of combating censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n
\n

\"They're kind of normalizing and empowering this company to do business with Musk and DOGE who are among the largest threats on climate in general today,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Browning stated. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard representative Amy Kamosa did not respond to Harvard's collaboration with Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard is working<\/a> in association with Tremont Strategies presently on the Allston I-90 Multimodal Project, an infrastructure development project to replace existing highway ramps with a new grid system permitting development on University-owned land.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Meanwhile, Harvard has made its own climate commitments. Harvard aims to be fossil fuel neutral by 2026, according to the University's Sustainability Office. Browning indicated that he thinks it's \"incompatible with Harvard's values\" to hire Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

F Minus has effectively pushed universities to sever their relationships with lobbying companies previously. They pushed John Hopkins University out of its relationship with a \"coal lobbyist,\" Browning reports. But he acknowledged Harvard might be reluctant to switch lobbying companies since the I-90 project is still in planning stages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cole A. Cochrane '27, Policy Director of the Harvard Undergraduate Clean Energy Group, added that he wishes Harvard would sever its ties with Tremont Strategies to make a statement regarding their top \"interests, priorities, and principles.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"When you've got an institution like Harvard, say one thing and do another, I think that sends a double standard to the public and to other institutions, corporations or even academic institutions broadly in the United States,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Cochrane said <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're an example for not just the United States, but the world,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We ought not to have hypocrisy as an institution that is all about being honest.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Harvard faces pressure to drop fossil fuel-linked lobbying firm","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harvard-faces-pressure-to-drop-fossil-fuel-linked-lobbying-firm","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7554","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7561,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_content":"\n

Corporate America\u2019s strongest opponent is initiating a lobbying group focused on \u201clong-term corporate oversight\u201d of diversity policies in companies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robby Starbuck, labeled a boardroom boogeyman for pushing companies like Walmart, Lowe\u2019s, and Harley-Davidson to drop their DEI initiatives, informed Semafor about his intention to establish a lobbying group \u201cto make sure this never occurs again.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck said he has gotten a \u201cblank check\u201d offer from at least one big Republican donor. \u201cThe catch is: they want the ability to kill stories\u201d \u2014 Starbuck said he considers himself a journalist \u2014 \u201cand pick targets. And I just don\u2019t work that way.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In an extensive interview on his Tennessee farm, Starbuck looked back at his campaign, which started around X last year and has subsequently pushed huge overhauls in at least more than a dozen firms with a total market capitalization of over $2 trillion. His efforts are precise and his reach has been propagated by individuals such as Elon Musk<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I get along well with Elon,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he states \u2014 and far-right celebrities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His advances often begin with a LinkedIn message to the CEO, and he said he treats seriously the non-disclosure contracts he signs with companies in order to permit honest discussions. How honest? \"I can't tell you how many times I've had [CEOs] say, 'No way, we're not going to do that\u2026 and then, 'Oh, crap, we're going to do that.'\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated he's counseled some agency leaders as they seek to meet a White House directive to name DEI \"worst offenders.\" But he indicated he wouldn't work for the administration, and cited a number of places where he differs with its policies, including expediting the bird flu vaccine (he ran against mandates regarding masking and the Covid-19 vaccine) and the administration's attack on free speech in the name of combating censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Browning stated that in collaborating with lobbyist companies affiliated with Tesla, Harvard and other institutions are sanctioned the company's work with Musk. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're kind of normalizing and empowering this company to do business with Musk and DOGE who are among the largest threats on climate in general today,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Browning stated. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard representative Amy Kamosa did not respond to Harvard's collaboration with Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard is working<\/a> in association with Tremont Strategies presently on the Allston I-90 Multimodal Project, an infrastructure development project to replace existing highway ramps with a new grid system permitting development on University-owned land.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Meanwhile, Harvard has made its own climate commitments. Harvard aims to be fossil fuel neutral by 2026, according to the University's Sustainability Office. Browning indicated that he thinks it's \"incompatible with Harvard's values\" to hire Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

F Minus has effectively pushed universities to sever their relationships with lobbying companies previously. They pushed John Hopkins University out of its relationship with a \"coal lobbyist,\" Browning reports. But he acknowledged Harvard might be reluctant to switch lobbying companies since the I-90 project is still in planning stages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cole A. Cochrane '27, Policy Director of the Harvard Undergraduate Clean Energy Group, added that he wishes Harvard would sever its ties with Tremont Strategies to make a statement regarding their top \"interests, priorities, and principles.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"When you've got an institution like Harvard, say one thing and do another, I think that sends a double standard to the public and to other institutions, corporations or even academic institutions broadly in the United States,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Cochrane said <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're an example for not just the United States, but the world,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We ought not to have hypocrisy as an institution that is all about being honest.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Harvard faces pressure to drop fossil fuel-linked lobbying firm","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harvard-faces-pressure-to-drop-fossil-fuel-linked-lobbying-firm","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7554","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7561,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_content":"\n

Corporate America\u2019s strongest opponent is initiating a lobbying group focused on \u201clong-term corporate oversight\u201d of diversity policies in companies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robby Starbuck, labeled a boardroom boogeyman for pushing companies like Walmart, Lowe\u2019s, and Harley-Davidson to drop their DEI initiatives, informed Semafor about his intention to establish a lobbying group \u201cto make sure this never occurs again.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck said he has gotten a \u201cblank check\u201d offer from at least one big Republican donor. \u201cThe catch is: they want the ability to kill stories\u201d \u2014 Starbuck said he considers himself a journalist \u2014 \u201cand pick targets. And I just don\u2019t work that way.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In an extensive interview on his Tennessee farm, Starbuck looked back at his campaign, which started around X last year and has subsequently pushed huge overhauls in at least more than a dozen firms with a total market capitalization of over $2 trillion. His efforts are precise and his reach has been propagated by individuals such as Elon Musk<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I get along well with Elon,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he states \u2014 and far-right celebrities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His advances often begin with a LinkedIn message to the CEO, and he said he treats seriously the non-disclosure contracts he signs with companies in order to permit honest discussions. How honest? \"I can't tell you how many times I've had [CEOs] say, 'No way, we're not going to do that\u2026 and then, 'Oh, crap, we're going to do that.'\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated he's counseled some agency leaders as they seek to meet a White House directive to name DEI \"worst offenders.\" But he indicated he wouldn't work for the administration, and cited a number of places where he differs with its policies, including expediting the bird flu vaccine (he ran against mandates regarding masking and the Covid-19 vaccine) and the administration's attack on free speech in the name of combating censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Tremont Strategies did not comment on requests. Musk, the billionaire Tesla CEO, also leads the Department of Government Efficiency. DOGE has eliminated over $60 million from the Environmental Protection Agency's budget since Trump was sworn in in January, and cancelled over 400 grants aimed at air and water quality and extreme weather resilience of communities nationwide.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Browning stated that in collaborating with lobbyist companies affiliated with Tesla, Harvard and other institutions are sanctioned the company's work with Musk. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're kind of normalizing and empowering this company to do business with Musk and DOGE who are among the largest threats on climate in general today,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Browning stated. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard representative Amy Kamosa did not respond to Harvard's collaboration with Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard is working<\/a> in association with Tremont Strategies presently on the Allston I-90 Multimodal Project, an infrastructure development project to replace existing highway ramps with a new grid system permitting development on University-owned land.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Meanwhile, Harvard has made its own climate commitments. Harvard aims to be fossil fuel neutral by 2026, according to the University's Sustainability Office. Browning indicated that he thinks it's \"incompatible with Harvard's values\" to hire Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

F Minus has effectively pushed universities to sever their relationships with lobbying companies previously. They pushed John Hopkins University out of its relationship with a \"coal lobbyist,\" Browning reports. But he acknowledged Harvard might be reluctant to switch lobbying companies since the I-90 project is still in planning stages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cole A. Cochrane '27, Policy Director of the Harvard Undergraduate Clean Energy Group, added that he wishes Harvard would sever its ties with Tremont Strategies to make a statement regarding their top \"interests, priorities, and principles.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"When you've got an institution like Harvard, say one thing and do another, I think that sends a double standard to the public and to other institutions, corporations or even academic institutions broadly in the United States,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Cochrane said <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're an example for not just the United States, but the world,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We ought not to have hypocrisy as an institution that is all about being honest.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Harvard faces pressure to drop fossil fuel-linked lobbying firm","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harvard-faces-pressure-to-drop-fossil-fuel-linked-lobbying-firm","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7554","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7561,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_content":"\n

Corporate America\u2019s strongest opponent is initiating a lobbying group focused on \u201clong-term corporate oversight\u201d of diversity policies in companies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robby Starbuck, labeled a boardroom boogeyman for pushing companies like Walmart, Lowe\u2019s, and Harley-Davidson to drop their DEI initiatives, informed Semafor about his intention to establish a lobbying group \u201cto make sure this never occurs again.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck said he has gotten a \u201cblank check\u201d offer from at least one big Republican donor. \u201cThe catch is: they want the ability to kill stories\u201d \u2014 Starbuck said he considers himself a journalist \u2014 \u201cand pick targets. And I just don\u2019t work that way.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In an extensive interview on his Tennessee farm, Starbuck looked back at his campaign, which started around X last year and has subsequently pushed huge overhauls in at least more than a dozen firms with a total market capitalization of over $2 trillion. His efforts are precise and his reach has been propagated by individuals such as Elon Musk<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I get along well with Elon,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he states \u2014 and far-right celebrities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His advances often begin with a LinkedIn message to the CEO, and he said he treats seriously the non-disclosure contracts he signs with companies in order to permit honest discussions. How honest? \"I can't tell you how many times I've had [CEOs] say, 'No way, we're not going to do that\u2026 and then, 'Oh, crap, we're going to do that.'\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated he's counseled some agency leaders as they seek to meet a White House directive to name DEI \"worst offenders.\" But he indicated he wouldn't work for the administration, and cited a number of places where he differs with its policies, including expediting the bird flu vaccine (he ran against mandates regarding masking and the Covid-19 vaccine) and the administration's attack on free speech in the name of combating censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

We apply all those tags in order to begin to tell the story of the ways in which the fossil fuel<\/a> lobbying these companies are doing is hurting some of their other clients, or working against what their other clients are attempting to achieve on climate,\" James Browning, director and founder of F Minus, explained. \"Then there's also an advocacy piece where we call on these other clients to drop these fossil fuel lobbying firms,\" he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tremont Strategies did not comment on requests. Musk, the billionaire Tesla CEO, also leads the Department of Government Efficiency. DOGE has eliminated over $60 million from the Environmental Protection Agency's budget since Trump was sworn in in January, and cancelled over 400 grants aimed at air and water quality and extreme weather resilience of communities nationwide.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Browning stated that in collaborating with lobbyist companies affiliated with Tesla, Harvard and other institutions are sanctioned the company's work with Musk. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're kind of normalizing and empowering this company to do business with Musk and DOGE who are among the largest threats on climate in general today,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Browning stated. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard representative Amy Kamosa did not respond to Harvard's collaboration with Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard is working<\/a> in association with Tremont Strategies presently on the Allston I-90 Multimodal Project, an infrastructure development project to replace existing highway ramps with a new grid system permitting development on University-owned land.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Meanwhile, Harvard has made its own climate commitments. Harvard aims to be fossil fuel neutral by 2026, according to the University's Sustainability Office. Browning indicated that he thinks it's \"incompatible with Harvard's values\" to hire Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

F Minus has effectively pushed universities to sever their relationships with lobbying companies previously. They pushed John Hopkins University out of its relationship with a \"coal lobbyist,\" Browning reports. But he acknowledged Harvard might be reluctant to switch lobbying companies since the I-90 project is still in planning stages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cole A. Cochrane '27, Policy Director of the Harvard Undergraduate Clean Energy Group, added that he wishes Harvard would sever its ties with Tremont Strategies to make a statement regarding their top \"interests, priorities, and principles.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"When you've got an institution like Harvard, say one thing and do another, I think that sends a double standard to the public and to other institutions, corporations or even academic institutions broadly in the United States,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Cochrane said <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're an example for not just the United States, but the world,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We ought not to have hypocrisy as an institution that is all about being honest.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Harvard faces pressure to drop fossil fuel-linked lobbying firm","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harvard-faces-pressure-to-drop-fossil-fuel-linked-lobbying-firm","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7554","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7561,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_content":"\n

Corporate America\u2019s strongest opponent is initiating a lobbying group focused on \u201clong-term corporate oversight\u201d of diversity policies in companies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robby Starbuck, labeled a boardroom boogeyman for pushing companies like Walmart, Lowe\u2019s, and Harley-Davidson to drop their DEI initiatives, informed Semafor about his intention to establish a lobbying group \u201cto make sure this never occurs again.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck said he has gotten a \u201cblank check\u201d offer from at least one big Republican donor. \u201cThe catch is: they want the ability to kill stories\u201d \u2014 Starbuck said he considers himself a journalist \u2014 \u201cand pick targets. And I just don\u2019t work that way.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In an extensive interview on his Tennessee farm, Starbuck looked back at his campaign, which started around X last year and has subsequently pushed huge overhauls in at least more than a dozen firms with a total market capitalization of over $2 trillion. His efforts are precise and his reach has been propagated by individuals such as Elon Musk<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I get along well with Elon,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he states \u2014 and far-right celebrities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His advances often begin with a LinkedIn message to the CEO, and he said he treats seriously the non-disclosure contracts he signs with companies in order to permit honest discussions. How honest? \"I can't tell you how many times I've had [CEOs] say, 'No way, we're not going to do that\u2026 and then, 'Oh, crap, we're going to do that.'\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated he's counseled some agency leaders as they seek to meet a White House directive to name DEI \"worst offenders.\" But he indicated he wouldn't work for the administration, and cited a number of places where he differs with its policies, including expediting the bird flu vaccine (he ran against mandates regarding masking and the Covid-19 vaccine) and the administration's attack on free speech in the name of combating censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

F Minus, a 2023 climate accountability organization, releases lists of lobbying firms that represent both climate advocacy organizations and fossil fuel corporations to highlight the loyalties of these lobbying firms to conflicting client objectives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We apply all those tags in order to begin to tell the story of the ways in which the fossil fuel<\/a> lobbying these companies are doing is hurting some of their other clients, or working against what their other clients are attempting to achieve on climate,\" James Browning, director and founder of F Minus, explained. \"Then there's also an advocacy piece where we call on these other clients to drop these fossil fuel lobbying firms,\" he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tremont Strategies did not comment on requests. Musk, the billionaire Tesla CEO, also leads the Department of Government Efficiency. DOGE has eliminated over $60 million from the Environmental Protection Agency's budget since Trump was sworn in in January, and cancelled over 400 grants aimed at air and water quality and extreme weather resilience of communities nationwide.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Browning stated that in collaborating with lobbyist companies affiliated with Tesla, Harvard and other institutions are sanctioned the company's work with Musk. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're kind of normalizing and empowering this company to do business with Musk and DOGE who are among the largest threats on climate in general today,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Browning stated. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard representative Amy Kamosa did not respond to Harvard's collaboration with Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard is working<\/a> in association with Tremont Strategies presently on the Allston I-90 Multimodal Project, an infrastructure development project to replace existing highway ramps with a new grid system permitting development on University-owned land.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Meanwhile, Harvard has made its own climate commitments. Harvard aims to be fossil fuel neutral by 2026, according to the University's Sustainability Office. Browning indicated that he thinks it's \"incompatible with Harvard's values\" to hire Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

F Minus has effectively pushed universities to sever their relationships with lobbying companies previously. They pushed John Hopkins University out of its relationship with a \"coal lobbyist,\" Browning reports. But he acknowledged Harvard might be reluctant to switch lobbying companies since the I-90 project is still in planning stages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cole A. Cochrane '27, Policy Director of the Harvard Undergraduate Clean Energy Group, added that he wishes Harvard would sever its ties with Tremont Strategies to make a statement regarding their top \"interests, priorities, and principles.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"When you've got an institution like Harvard, say one thing and do another, I think that sends a double standard to the public and to other institutions, corporations or even academic institutions broadly in the United States,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Cochrane said <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're an example for not just the United States, but the world,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We ought not to have hypocrisy as an institution that is all about being honest.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Harvard faces pressure to drop fossil fuel-linked lobbying firm","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harvard-faces-pressure-to-drop-fossil-fuel-linked-lobbying-firm","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7554","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7561,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_content":"\n

Corporate America\u2019s strongest opponent is initiating a lobbying group focused on \u201clong-term corporate oversight\u201d of diversity policies in companies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robby Starbuck, labeled a boardroom boogeyman for pushing companies like Walmart, Lowe\u2019s, and Harley-Davidson to drop their DEI initiatives, informed Semafor about his intention to establish a lobbying group \u201cto make sure this never occurs again.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck said he has gotten a \u201cblank check\u201d offer from at least one big Republican donor. \u201cThe catch is: they want the ability to kill stories\u201d \u2014 Starbuck said he considers himself a journalist \u2014 \u201cand pick targets. And I just don\u2019t work that way.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In an extensive interview on his Tennessee farm, Starbuck looked back at his campaign, which started around X last year and has subsequently pushed huge overhauls in at least more than a dozen firms with a total market capitalization of over $2 trillion. His efforts are precise and his reach has been propagated by individuals such as Elon Musk<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I get along well with Elon,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he states \u2014 and far-right celebrities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His advances often begin with a LinkedIn message to the CEO, and he said he treats seriously the non-disclosure contracts he signs with companies in order to permit honest discussions. How honest? \"I can't tell you how many times I've had [CEOs] say, 'No way, we're not going to do that\u2026 and then, 'Oh, crap, we're going to do that.'\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated he's counseled some agency leaders as they seek to meet a White House directive to name DEI \"worst offenders.\" But he indicated he wouldn't work for the administration, and cited a number of places where he differs with its policies, including expediting the bird flu vaccine (he ran against mandates regarding masking and the Covid-19 vaccine) and the administration's attack on free speech in the name of combating censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Climate responsibility firm F Minus will publish a report linking Harvard to Tesla <\/a>via a common lobbying firm, Tremont Strategies, and is calling on the University to distance itself from the lobbyists.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

F Minus, a 2023 climate accountability organization, releases lists of lobbying firms that represent both climate advocacy organizations and fossil fuel corporations to highlight the loyalties of these lobbying firms to conflicting client objectives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We apply all those tags in order to begin to tell the story of the ways in which the fossil fuel<\/a> lobbying these companies are doing is hurting some of their other clients, or working against what their other clients are attempting to achieve on climate,\" James Browning, director and founder of F Minus, explained. \"Then there's also an advocacy piece where we call on these other clients to drop these fossil fuel lobbying firms,\" he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tremont Strategies did not comment on requests. Musk, the billionaire Tesla CEO, also leads the Department of Government Efficiency. DOGE has eliminated over $60 million from the Environmental Protection Agency's budget since Trump was sworn in in January, and cancelled over 400 grants aimed at air and water quality and extreme weather resilience of communities nationwide.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Browning stated that in collaborating with lobbyist companies affiliated with Tesla, Harvard and other institutions are sanctioned the company's work with Musk. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're kind of normalizing and empowering this company to do business with Musk and DOGE who are among the largest threats on climate in general today,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Browning stated. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard representative Amy Kamosa did not respond to Harvard's collaboration with Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard is working<\/a> in association with Tremont Strategies presently on the Allston I-90 Multimodal Project, an infrastructure development project to replace existing highway ramps with a new grid system permitting development on University-owned land.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Meanwhile, Harvard has made its own climate commitments. Harvard aims to be fossil fuel neutral by 2026, according to the University's Sustainability Office. Browning indicated that he thinks it's \"incompatible with Harvard's values\" to hire Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

F Minus has effectively pushed universities to sever their relationships with lobbying companies previously. They pushed John Hopkins University out of its relationship with a \"coal lobbyist,\" Browning reports. But he acknowledged Harvard might be reluctant to switch lobbying companies since the I-90 project is still in planning stages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cole A. Cochrane '27, Policy Director of the Harvard Undergraduate Clean Energy Group, added that he wishes Harvard would sever its ties with Tremont Strategies to make a statement regarding their top \"interests, priorities, and principles.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"When you've got an institution like Harvard, say one thing and do another, I think that sends a double standard to the public and to other institutions, corporations or even academic institutions broadly in the United States,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Cochrane said <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're an example for not just the United States, but the world,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We ought not to have hypocrisy as an institution that is all about being honest.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Harvard faces pressure to drop fossil fuel-linked lobbying firm","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harvard-faces-pressure-to-drop-fossil-fuel-linked-lobbying-firm","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7554","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7561,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_content":"\n

Corporate America\u2019s strongest opponent is initiating a lobbying group focused on \u201clong-term corporate oversight\u201d of diversity policies in companies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robby Starbuck, labeled a boardroom boogeyman for pushing companies like Walmart, Lowe\u2019s, and Harley-Davidson to drop their DEI initiatives, informed Semafor about his intention to establish a lobbying group \u201cto make sure this never occurs again.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck said he has gotten a \u201cblank check\u201d offer from at least one big Republican donor. \u201cThe catch is: they want the ability to kill stories\u201d \u2014 Starbuck said he considers himself a journalist \u2014 \u201cand pick targets. And I just don\u2019t work that way.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In an extensive interview on his Tennessee farm, Starbuck looked back at his campaign, which started around X last year and has subsequently pushed huge overhauls in at least more than a dozen firms with a total market capitalization of over $2 trillion. His efforts are precise and his reach has been propagated by individuals such as Elon Musk<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I get along well with Elon,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he states \u2014 and far-right celebrities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His advances often begin with a LinkedIn message to the CEO, and he said he treats seriously the non-disclosure contracts he signs with companies in order to permit honest discussions. How honest? \"I can't tell you how many times I've had [CEOs] say, 'No way, we're not going to do that\u2026 and then, 'Oh, crap, we're going to do that.'\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated he's counseled some agency leaders as they seek to meet a White House directive to name DEI \"worst offenders.\" But he indicated he wouldn't work for the administration, and cited a number of places where he differs with its policies, including expediting the bird flu vaccine (he ran against mandates regarding masking and the Covid-19 vaccine) and the administration's attack on free speech in the name of combating censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7554,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content":"\n

Climate responsibility firm F Minus will publish a report linking Harvard to Tesla <\/a>via a common lobbying firm, Tremont Strategies, and is calling on the University to distance itself from the lobbyists.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

F Minus, a 2023 climate accountability organization, releases lists of lobbying firms that represent both climate advocacy organizations and fossil fuel corporations to highlight the loyalties of these lobbying firms to conflicting client objectives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We apply all those tags in order to begin to tell the story of the ways in which the fossil fuel<\/a> lobbying these companies are doing is hurting some of their other clients, or working against what their other clients are attempting to achieve on climate,\" James Browning, director and founder of F Minus, explained. \"Then there's also an advocacy piece where we call on these other clients to drop these fossil fuel lobbying firms,\" he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tremont Strategies did not comment on requests. Musk, the billionaire Tesla CEO, also leads the Department of Government Efficiency. DOGE has eliminated over $60 million from the Environmental Protection Agency's budget since Trump was sworn in in January, and cancelled over 400 grants aimed at air and water quality and extreme weather resilience of communities nationwide.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Browning stated that in collaborating with lobbyist companies affiliated with Tesla, Harvard and other institutions are sanctioned the company's work with Musk. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're kind of normalizing and empowering this company to do business with Musk and DOGE who are among the largest threats on climate in general today,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Browning stated. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard representative Amy Kamosa did not respond to Harvard's collaboration with Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard is working<\/a> in association with Tremont Strategies presently on the Allston I-90 Multimodal Project, an infrastructure development project to replace existing highway ramps with a new grid system permitting development on University-owned land.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Meanwhile, Harvard has made its own climate commitments. Harvard aims to be fossil fuel neutral by 2026, according to the University's Sustainability Office. Browning indicated that he thinks it's \"incompatible with Harvard's values\" to hire Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

F Minus has effectively pushed universities to sever their relationships with lobbying companies previously. They pushed John Hopkins University out of its relationship with a \"coal lobbyist,\" Browning reports. But he acknowledged Harvard might be reluctant to switch lobbying companies since the I-90 project is still in planning stages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cole A. Cochrane '27, Policy Director of the Harvard Undergraduate Clean Energy Group, added that he wishes Harvard would sever its ties with Tremont Strategies to make a statement regarding their top \"interests, priorities, and principles.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"When you've got an institution like Harvard, say one thing and do another, I think that sends a double standard to the public and to other institutions, corporations or even academic institutions broadly in the United States,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Cochrane said <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're an example for not just the United States, but the world,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We ought not to have hypocrisy as an institution that is all about being honest.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Harvard faces pressure to drop fossil fuel-linked lobbying firm","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harvard-faces-pressure-to-drop-fossil-fuel-linked-lobbying-firm","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7554","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7561,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_content":"\n

Corporate America\u2019s strongest opponent is initiating a lobbying group focused on \u201clong-term corporate oversight\u201d of diversity policies in companies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robby Starbuck, labeled a boardroom boogeyman for pushing companies like Walmart, Lowe\u2019s, and Harley-Davidson to drop their DEI initiatives, informed Semafor about his intention to establish a lobbying group \u201cto make sure this never occurs again.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck said he has gotten a \u201cblank check\u201d offer from at least one big Republican donor. \u201cThe catch is: they want the ability to kill stories\u201d \u2014 Starbuck said he considers himself a journalist \u2014 \u201cand pick targets. And I just don\u2019t work that way.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In an extensive interview on his Tennessee farm, Starbuck looked back at his campaign, which started around X last year and has subsequently pushed huge overhauls in at least more than a dozen firms with a total market capitalization of over $2 trillion. His efforts are precise and his reach has been propagated by individuals such as Elon Musk<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I get along well with Elon,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he states \u2014 and far-right celebrities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His advances often begin with a LinkedIn message to the CEO, and he said he treats seriously the non-disclosure contracts he signs with companies in order to permit honest discussions. How honest? \"I can't tell you how many times I've had [CEOs] say, 'No way, we're not going to do that\u2026 and then, 'Oh, crap, we're going to do that.'\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated he's counseled some agency leaders as they seek to meet a White House directive to name DEI \"worst offenders.\" But he indicated he wouldn't work for the administration, and cited a number of places where he differs with its policies, including expediting the bird flu vaccine (he ran against mandates regarding masking and the Covid-19 vaccine) and the administration's attack on free speech in the name of combating censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7554,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content":"\n

Climate responsibility firm F Minus will publish a report linking Harvard to Tesla <\/a>via a common lobbying firm, Tremont Strategies, and is calling on the University to distance itself from the lobbyists.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

F Minus, a 2023 climate accountability organization, releases lists of lobbying firms that represent both climate advocacy organizations and fossil fuel corporations to highlight the loyalties of these lobbying firms to conflicting client objectives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We apply all those tags in order to begin to tell the story of the ways in which the fossil fuel<\/a> lobbying these companies are doing is hurting some of their other clients, or working against what their other clients are attempting to achieve on climate,\" James Browning, director and founder of F Minus, explained. \"Then there's also an advocacy piece where we call on these other clients to drop these fossil fuel lobbying firms,\" he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tremont Strategies did not comment on requests. Musk, the billionaire Tesla CEO, also leads the Department of Government Efficiency. DOGE has eliminated over $60 million from the Environmental Protection Agency's budget since Trump was sworn in in January, and cancelled over 400 grants aimed at air and water quality and extreme weather resilience of communities nationwide.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Browning stated that in collaborating with lobbyist companies affiliated with Tesla, Harvard and other institutions are sanctioned the company's work with Musk. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're kind of normalizing and empowering this company to do business with Musk and DOGE who are among the largest threats on climate in general today,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Browning stated. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard representative Amy Kamosa did not respond to Harvard's collaboration with Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard is working<\/a> in association with Tremont Strategies presently on the Allston I-90 Multimodal Project, an infrastructure development project to replace existing highway ramps with a new grid system permitting development on University-owned land.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Meanwhile, Harvard has made its own climate commitments. Harvard aims to be fossil fuel neutral by 2026, according to the University's Sustainability Office. Browning indicated that he thinks it's \"incompatible with Harvard's values\" to hire Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

F Minus has effectively pushed universities to sever their relationships with lobbying companies previously. They pushed John Hopkins University out of its relationship with a \"coal lobbyist,\" Browning reports. But he acknowledged Harvard might be reluctant to switch lobbying companies since the I-90 project is still in planning stages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cole A. Cochrane '27, Policy Director of the Harvard Undergraduate Clean Energy Group, added that he wishes Harvard would sever its ties with Tremont Strategies to make a statement regarding their top \"interests, priorities, and principles.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"When you've got an institution like Harvard, say one thing and do another, I think that sends a double standard to the public and to other institutions, corporations or even academic institutions broadly in the United States,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Cochrane said <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're an example for not just the United States, but the world,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We ought not to have hypocrisy as an institution that is all about being honest.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Harvard faces pressure to drop fossil fuel-linked lobbying firm","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harvard-faces-pressure-to-drop-fossil-fuel-linked-lobbying-firm","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7554","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7561,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_content":"\n

Corporate America\u2019s strongest opponent is initiating a lobbying group focused on \u201clong-term corporate oversight\u201d of diversity policies in companies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robby Starbuck, labeled a boardroom boogeyman for pushing companies like Walmart, Lowe\u2019s, and Harley-Davidson to drop their DEI initiatives, informed Semafor about his intention to establish a lobbying group \u201cto make sure this never occurs again.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck said he has gotten a \u201cblank check\u201d offer from at least one big Republican donor. \u201cThe catch is: they want the ability to kill stories\u201d \u2014 Starbuck said he considers himself a journalist \u2014 \u201cand pick targets. And I just don\u2019t work that way.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In an extensive interview on his Tennessee farm, Starbuck looked back at his campaign, which started around X last year and has subsequently pushed huge overhauls in at least more than a dozen firms with a total market capitalization of over $2 trillion. His efforts are precise and his reach has been propagated by individuals such as Elon Musk<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I get along well with Elon,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he states \u2014 and far-right celebrities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His advances often begin with a LinkedIn message to the CEO, and he said he treats seriously the non-disclosure contracts he signs with companies in order to permit honest discussions. How honest? \"I can't tell you how many times I've had [CEOs] say, 'No way, we're not going to do that\u2026 and then, 'Oh, crap, we're going to do that.'\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated he's counseled some agency leaders as they seek to meet a White House directive to name DEI \"worst offenders.\" But he indicated he wouldn't work for the administration, and cited a number of places where he differs with its policies, including expediting the bird flu vaccine (he ran against mandates regarding masking and the Covid-19 vaccine) and the administration's attack on free speech in the name of combating censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7554,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content":"\n

Climate responsibility firm F Minus will publish a report linking Harvard to Tesla <\/a>via a common lobbying firm, Tremont Strategies, and is calling on the University to distance itself from the lobbyists.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

F Minus, a 2023 climate accountability organization, releases lists of lobbying firms that represent both climate advocacy organizations and fossil fuel corporations to highlight the loyalties of these lobbying firms to conflicting client objectives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We apply all those tags in order to begin to tell the story of the ways in which the fossil fuel<\/a> lobbying these companies are doing is hurting some of their other clients, or working against what their other clients are attempting to achieve on climate,\" James Browning, director and founder of F Minus, explained. \"Then there's also an advocacy piece where we call on these other clients to drop these fossil fuel lobbying firms,\" he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tremont Strategies did not comment on requests. Musk, the billionaire Tesla CEO, also leads the Department of Government Efficiency. DOGE has eliminated over $60 million from the Environmental Protection Agency's budget since Trump was sworn in in January, and cancelled over 400 grants aimed at air and water quality and extreme weather resilience of communities nationwide.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Browning stated that in collaborating with lobbyist companies affiliated with Tesla, Harvard and other institutions are sanctioned the company's work with Musk. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're kind of normalizing and empowering this company to do business with Musk and DOGE who are among the largest threats on climate in general today,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Browning stated. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard representative Amy Kamosa did not respond to Harvard's collaboration with Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard is working<\/a> in association with Tremont Strategies presently on the Allston I-90 Multimodal Project, an infrastructure development project to replace existing highway ramps with a new grid system permitting development on University-owned land.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Meanwhile, Harvard has made its own climate commitments. Harvard aims to be fossil fuel neutral by 2026, according to the University's Sustainability Office. Browning indicated that he thinks it's \"incompatible with Harvard's values\" to hire Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

F Minus has effectively pushed universities to sever their relationships with lobbying companies previously. They pushed John Hopkins University out of its relationship with a \"coal lobbyist,\" Browning reports. But he acknowledged Harvard might be reluctant to switch lobbying companies since the I-90 project is still in planning stages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cole A. Cochrane '27, Policy Director of the Harvard Undergraduate Clean Energy Group, added that he wishes Harvard would sever its ties with Tremont Strategies to make a statement regarding their top \"interests, priorities, and principles.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"When you've got an institution like Harvard, say one thing and do another, I think that sends a double standard to the public and to other institutions, corporations or even academic institutions broadly in the United States,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Cochrane said <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're an example for not just the United States, but the world,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We ought not to have hypocrisy as an institution that is all about being honest.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Harvard faces pressure to drop fossil fuel-linked lobbying firm","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harvard-faces-pressure-to-drop-fossil-fuel-linked-lobbying-firm","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7554","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7561,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_content":"\n

Corporate America\u2019s strongest opponent is initiating a lobbying group focused on \u201clong-term corporate oversight\u201d of diversity policies in companies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robby Starbuck, labeled a boardroom boogeyman for pushing companies like Walmart, Lowe\u2019s, and Harley-Davidson to drop their DEI initiatives, informed Semafor about his intention to establish a lobbying group \u201cto make sure this never occurs again.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck said he has gotten a \u201cblank check\u201d offer from at least one big Republican donor. \u201cThe catch is: they want the ability to kill stories\u201d \u2014 Starbuck said he considers himself a journalist \u2014 \u201cand pick targets. And I just don\u2019t work that way.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In an extensive interview on his Tennessee farm, Starbuck looked back at his campaign, which started around X last year and has subsequently pushed huge overhauls in at least more than a dozen firms with a total market capitalization of over $2 trillion. His efforts are precise and his reach has been propagated by individuals such as Elon Musk<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I get along well with Elon,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he states \u2014 and far-right celebrities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His advances often begin with a LinkedIn message to the CEO, and he said he treats seriously the non-disclosure contracts he signs with companies in order to permit honest discussions. How honest? \"I can't tell you how many times I've had [CEOs] say, 'No way, we're not going to do that\u2026 and then, 'Oh, crap, we're going to do that.'\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated he's counseled some agency leaders as they seek to meet a White House directive to name DEI \"worst offenders.\" But he indicated he wouldn't work for the administration, and cited a number of places where he differs with its policies, including expediting the bird flu vaccine (he ran against mandates regarding masking and the Covid-19 vaccine) and the administration's attack on free speech in the name of combating censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7554,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content":"\n

Climate responsibility firm F Minus will publish a report linking Harvard to Tesla <\/a>via a common lobbying firm, Tremont Strategies, and is calling on the University to distance itself from the lobbyists.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

F Minus, a 2023 climate accountability organization, releases lists of lobbying firms that represent both climate advocacy organizations and fossil fuel corporations to highlight the loyalties of these lobbying firms to conflicting client objectives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We apply all those tags in order to begin to tell the story of the ways in which the fossil fuel<\/a> lobbying these companies are doing is hurting some of their other clients, or working against what their other clients are attempting to achieve on climate,\" James Browning, director and founder of F Minus, explained. \"Then there's also an advocacy piece where we call on these other clients to drop these fossil fuel lobbying firms,\" he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tremont Strategies did not comment on requests. Musk, the billionaire Tesla CEO, also leads the Department of Government Efficiency. DOGE has eliminated over $60 million from the Environmental Protection Agency's budget since Trump was sworn in in January, and cancelled over 400 grants aimed at air and water quality and extreme weather resilience of communities nationwide.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Browning stated that in collaborating with lobbyist companies affiliated with Tesla, Harvard and other institutions are sanctioned the company's work with Musk. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're kind of normalizing and empowering this company to do business with Musk and DOGE who are among the largest threats on climate in general today,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Browning stated. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard representative Amy Kamosa did not respond to Harvard's collaboration with Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard is working<\/a> in association with Tremont Strategies presently on the Allston I-90 Multimodal Project, an infrastructure development project to replace existing highway ramps with a new grid system permitting development on University-owned land.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Meanwhile, Harvard has made its own climate commitments. Harvard aims to be fossil fuel neutral by 2026, according to the University's Sustainability Office. Browning indicated that he thinks it's \"incompatible with Harvard's values\" to hire Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

F Minus has effectively pushed universities to sever their relationships with lobbying companies previously. They pushed John Hopkins University out of its relationship with a \"coal lobbyist,\" Browning reports. But he acknowledged Harvard might be reluctant to switch lobbying companies since the I-90 project is still in planning stages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cole A. Cochrane '27, Policy Director of the Harvard Undergraduate Clean Energy Group, added that he wishes Harvard would sever its ties with Tremont Strategies to make a statement regarding their top \"interests, priorities, and principles.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"When you've got an institution like Harvard, say one thing and do another, I think that sends a double standard to the public and to other institutions, corporations or even academic institutions broadly in the United States,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Cochrane said <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're an example for not just the United States, but the world,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We ought not to have hypocrisy as an institution that is all about being honest.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Harvard faces pressure to drop fossil fuel-linked lobbying firm","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harvard-faces-pressure-to-drop-fossil-fuel-linked-lobbying-firm","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7554","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7561,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_content":"\n

Corporate America\u2019s strongest opponent is initiating a lobbying group focused on \u201clong-term corporate oversight\u201d of diversity policies in companies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robby Starbuck, labeled a boardroom boogeyman for pushing companies like Walmart, Lowe\u2019s, and Harley-Davidson to drop their DEI initiatives, informed Semafor about his intention to establish a lobbying group \u201cto make sure this never occurs again.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck said he has gotten a \u201cblank check\u201d offer from at least one big Republican donor. \u201cThe catch is: they want the ability to kill stories\u201d \u2014 Starbuck said he considers himself a journalist \u2014 \u201cand pick targets. And I just don\u2019t work that way.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In an extensive interview on his Tennessee farm, Starbuck looked back at his campaign, which started around X last year and has subsequently pushed huge overhauls in at least more than a dozen firms with a total market capitalization of over $2 trillion. His efforts are precise and his reach has been propagated by individuals such as Elon Musk<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I get along well with Elon,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he states \u2014 and far-right celebrities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His advances often begin with a LinkedIn message to the CEO, and he said he treats seriously the non-disclosure contracts he signs with companies in order to permit honest discussions. How honest? \"I can't tell you how many times I've had [CEOs] say, 'No way, we're not going to do that\u2026 and then, 'Oh, crap, we're going to do that.'\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated he's counseled some agency leaders as they seek to meet a White House directive to name DEI \"worst offenders.\" But he indicated he wouldn't work for the administration, and cited a number of places where he differs with its policies, including expediting the bird flu vaccine (he ran against mandates regarding masking and the Covid-19 vaccine) and the administration's attack on free speech in the name of combating censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7554,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content":"\n

Climate responsibility firm F Minus will publish a report linking Harvard to Tesla <\/a>via a common lobbying firm, Tremont Strategies, and is calling on the University to distance itself from the lobbyists.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

F Minus, a 2023 climate accountability organization, releases lists of lobbying firms that represent both climate advocacy organizations and fossil fuel corporations to highlight the loyalties of these lobbying firms to conflicting client objectives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We apply all those tags in order to begin to tell the story of the ways in which the fossil fuel<\/a> lobbying these companies are doing is hurting some of their other clients, or working against what their other clients are attempting to achieve on climate,\" James Browning, director and founder of F Minus, explained. \"Then there's also an advocacy piece where we call on these other clients to drop these fossil fuel lobbying firms,\" he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tremont Strategies did not comment on requests. Musk, the billionaire Tesla CEO, also leads the Department of Government Efficiency. DOGE has eliminated over $60 million from the Environmental Protection Agency's budget since Trump was sworn in in January, and cancelled over 400 grants aimed at air and water quality and extreme weather resilience of communities nationwide.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Browning stated that in collaborating with lobbyist companies affiliated with Tesla, Harvard and other institutions are sanctioned the company's work with Musk. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're kind of normalizing and empowering this company to do business with Musk and DOGE who are among the largest threats on climate in general today,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Browning stated. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard representative Amy Kamosa did not respond to Harvard's collaboration with Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard is working<\/a> in association with Tremont Strategies presently on the Allston I-90 Multimodal Project, an infrastructure development project to replace existing highway ramps with a new grid system permitting development on University-owned land.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Meanwhile, Harvard has made its own climate commitments. Harvard aims to be fossil fuel neutral by 2026, according to the University's Sustainability Office. Browning indicated that he thinks it's \"incompatible with Harvard's values\" to hire Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

F Minus has effectively pushed universities to sever their relationships with lobbying companies previously. They pushed John Hopkins University out of its relationship with a \"coal lobbyist,\" Browning reports. But he acknowledged Harvard might be reluctant to switch lobbying companies since the I-90 project is still in planning stages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cole A. Cochrane '27, Policy Director of the Harvard Undergraduate Clean Energy Group, added that he wishes Harvard would sever its ties with Tremont Strategies to make a statement regarding their top \"interests, priorities, and principles.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"When you've got an institution like Harvard, say one thing and do another, I think that sends a double standard to the public and to other institutions, corporations or even academic institutions broadly in the United States,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Cochrane said <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're an example for not just the United States, but the world,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We ought not to have hypocrisy as an institution that is all about being honest.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Harvard faces pressure to drop fossil fuel-linked lobbying firm","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harvard-faces-pressure-to-drop-fossil-fuel-linked-lobbying-firm","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7554","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7561,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_content":"\n

Corporate America\u2019s strongest opponent is initiating a lobbying group focused on \u201clong-term corporate oversight\u201d of diversity policies in companies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robby Starbuck, labeled a boardroom boogeyman for pushing companies like Walmart, Lowe\u2019s, and Harley-Davidson to drop their DEI initiatives, informed Semafor about his intention to establish a lobbying group \u201cto make sure this never occurs again.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck said he has gotten a \u201cblank check\u201d offer from at least one big Republican donor. \u201cThe catch is: they want the ability to kill stories\u201d \u2014 Starbuck said he considers himself a journalist \u2014 \u201cand pick targets. And I just don\u2019t work that way.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In an extensive interview on his Tennessee farm, Starbuck looked back at his campaign, which started around X last year and has subsequently pushed huge overhauls in at least more than a dozen firms with a total market capitalization of over $2 trillion. His efforts are precise and his reach has been propagated by individuals such as Elon Musk<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I get along well with Elon,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he states \u2014 and far-right celebrities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His advances often begin with a LinkedIn message to the CEO, and he said he treats seriously the non-disclosure contracts he signs with companies in order to permit honest discussions. How honest? \"I can't tell you how many times I've had [CEOs] say, 'No way, we're not going to do that\u2026 and then, 'Oh, crap, we're going to do that.'\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated he's counseled some agency leaders as they seek to meet a White House directive to name DEI \"worst offenders.\" But he indicated he wouldn't work for the administration, and cited a number of places where he differs with its policies, including expediting the bird flu vaccine (he ran against mandates regarding masking and the Covid-19 vaccine) and the administration's attack on free speech in the name of combating censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7554,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content":"\n

Climate responsibility firm F Minus will publish a report linking Harvard to Tesla <\/a>via a common lobbying firm, Tremont Strategies, and is calling on the University to distance itself from the lobbyists.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

F Minus, a 2023 climate accountability organization, releases lists of lobbying firms that represent both climate advocacy organizations and fossil fuel corporations to highlight the loyalties of these lobbying firms to conflicting client objectives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We apply all those tags in order to begin to tell the story of the ways in which the fossil fuel<\/a> lobbying these companies are doing is hurting some of their other clients, or working against what their other clients are attempting to achieve on climate,\" James Browning, director and founder of F Minus, explained. \"Then there's also an advocacy piece where we call on these other clients to drop these fossil fuel lobbying firms,\" he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tremont Strategies did not comment on requests. Musk, the billionaire Tesla CEO, also leads the Department of Government Efficiency. DOGE has eliminated over $60 million from the Environmental Protection Agency's budget since Trump was sworn in in January, and cancelled over 400 grants aimed at air and water quality and extreme weather resilience of communities nationwide.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Browning stated that in collaborating with lobbyist companies affiliated with Tesla, Harvard and other institutions are sanctioned the company's work with Musk. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're kind of normalizing and empowering this company to do business with Musk and DOGE who are among the largest threats on climate in general today,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Browning stated. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard representative Amy Kamosa did not respond to Harvard's collaboration with Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard is working<\/a> in association with Tremont Strategies presently on the Allston I-90 Multimodal Project, an infrastructure development project to replace existing highway ramps with a new grid system permitting development on University-owned land.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Meanwhile, Harvard has made its own climate commitments. Harvard aims to be fossil fuel neutral by 2026, according to the University's Sustainability Office. Browning indicated that he thinks it's \"incompatible with Harvard's values\" to hire Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

F Minus has effectively pushed universities to sever their relationships with lobbying companies previously. They pushed John Hopkins University out of its relationship with a \"coal lobbyist,\" Browning reports. But he acknowledged Harvard might be reluctant to switch lobbying companies since the I-90 project is still in planning stages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cole A. Cochrane '27, Policy Director of the Harvard Undergraduate Clean Energy Group, added that he wishes Harvard would sever its ties with Tremont Strategies to make a statement regarding their top \"interests, priorities, and principles.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"When you've got an institution like Harvard, say one thing and do another, I think that sends a double standard to the public and to other institutions, corporations or even academic institutions broadly in the United States,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Cochrane said <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're an example for not just the United States, but the world,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We ought not to have hypocrisy as an institution that is all about being honest.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Harvard faces pressure to drop fossil fuel-linked lobbying firm","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harvard-faces-pressure-to-drop-fossil-fuel-linked-lobbying-firm","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7554","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7561,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_content":"\n

Corporate America\u2019s strongest opponent is initiating a lobbying group focused on \u201clong-term corporate oversight\u201d of diversity policies in companies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robby Starbuck, labeled a boardroom boogeyman for pushing companies like Walmart, Lowe\u2019s, and Harley-Davidson to drop their DEI initiatives, informed Semafor about his intention to establish a lobbying group \u201cto make sure this never occurs again.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck said he has gotten a \u201cblank check\u201d offer from at least one big Republican donor. \u201cThe catch is: they want the ability to kill stories\u201d \u2014 Starbuck said he considers himself a journalist \u2014 \u201cand pick targets. And I just don\u2019t work that way.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In an extensive interview on his Tennessee farm, Starbuck looked back at his campaign, which started around X last year and has subsequently pushed huge overhauls in at least more than a dozen firms with a total market capitalization of over $2 trillion. His efforts are precise and his reach has been propagated by individuals such as Elon Musk<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I get along well with Elon,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he states \u2014 and far-right celebrities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His advances often begin with a LinkedIn message to the CEO, and he said he treats seriously the non-disclosure contracts he signs with companies in order to permit honest discussions. How honest? \"I can't tell you how many times I've had [CEOs] say, 'No way, we're not going to do that\u2026 and then, 'Oh, crap, we're going to do that.'\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated he's counseled some agency leaders as they seek to meet a White House directive to name DEI \"worst offenders.\" But he indicated he wouldn't work for the administration, and cited a number of places where he differs with its policies, including expediting the bird flu vaccine (he ran against mandates regarding masking and the Covid-19 vaccine) and the administration's attack on free speech in the name of combating censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7554,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content":"\n

Climate responsibility firm F Minus will publish a report linking Harvard to Tesla <\/a>via a common lobbying firm, Tremont Strategies, and is calling on the University to distance itself from the lobbyists.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

F Minus, a 2023 climate accountability organization, releases lists of lobbying firms that represent both climate advocacy organizations and fossil fuel corporations to highlight the loyalties of these lobbying firms to conflicting client objectives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We apply all those tags in order to begin to tell the story of the ways in which the fossil fuel<\/a> lobbying these companies are doing is hurting some of their other clients, or working against what their other clients are attempting to achieve on climate,\" James Browning, director and founder of F Minus, explained. \"Then there's also an advocacy piece where we call on these other clients to drop these fossil fuel lobbying firms,\" he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tremont Strategies did not comment on requests. Musk, the billionaire Tesla CEO, also leads the Department of Government Efficiency. DOGE has eliminated over $60 million from the Environmental Protection Agency's budget since Trump was sworn in in January, and cancelled over 400 grants aimed at air and water quality and extreme weather resilience of communities nationwide.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Browning stated that in collaborating with lobbyist companies affiliated with Tesla, Harvard and other institutions are sanctioned the company's work with Musk. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're kind of normalizing and empowering this company to do business with Musk and DOGE who are among the largest threats on climate in general today,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Browning stated. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard representative Amy Kamosa did not respond to Harvard's collaboration with Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard is working<\/a> in association with Tremont Strategies presently on the Allston I-90 Multimodal Project, an infrastructure development project to replace existing highway ramps with a new grid system permitting development on University-owned land.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Meanwhile, Harvard has made its own climate commitments. Harvard aims to be fossil fuel neutral by 2026, according to the University's Sustainability Office. Browning indicated that he thinks it's \"incompatible with Harvard's values\" to hire Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

F Minus has effectively pushed universities to sever their relationships with lobbying companies previously. They pushed John Hopkins University out of its relationship with a \"coal lobbyist,\" Browning reports. But he acknowledged Harvard might be reluctant to switch lobbying companies since the I-90 project is still in planning stages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cole A. Cochrane '27, Policy Director of the Harvard Undergraduate Clean Energy Group, added that he wishes Harvard would sever its ties with Tremont Strategies to make a statement regarding their top \"interests, priorities, and principles.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"When you've got an institution like Harvard, say one thing and do another, I think that sends a double standard to the public and to other institutions, corporations or even academic institutions broadly in the United States,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Cochrane said <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're an example for not just the United States, but the world,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We ought not to have hypocrisy as an institution that is all about being honest.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Harvard faces pressure to drop fossil fuel-linked lobbying firm","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harvard-faces-pressure-to-drop-fossil-fuel-linked-lobbying-firm","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7554","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7561,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_content":"\n

Corporate America\u2019s strongest opponent is initiating a lobbying group focused on \u201clong-term corporate oversight\u201d of diversity policies in companies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robby Starbuck, labeled a boardroom boogeyman for pushing companies like Walmart, Lowe\u2019s, and Harley-Davidson to drop their DEI initiatives, informed Semafor about his intention to establish a lobbying group \u201cto make sure this never occurs again.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck said he has gotten a \u201cblank check\u201d offer from at least one big Republican donor. \u201cThe catch is: they want the ability to kill stories\u201d \u2014 Starbuck said he considers himself a journalist \u2014 \u201cand pick targets. And I just don\u2019t work that way.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In an extensive interview on his Tennessee farm, Starbuck looked back at his campaign, which started around X last year and has subsequently pushed huge overhauls in at least more than a dozen firms with a total market capitalization of over $2 trillion. His efforts are precise and his reach has been propagated by individuals such as Elon Musk<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I get along well with Elon,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he states \u2014 and far-right celebrities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His advances often begin with a LinkedIn message to the CEO, and he said he treats seriously the non-disclosure contracts he signs with companies in order to permit honest discussions. How honest? \"I can't tell you how many times I've had [CEOs] say, 'No way, we're not going to do that\u2026 and then, 'Oh, crap, we're going to do that.'\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated he's counseled some agency leaders as they seek to meet a White House directive to name DEI \"worst offenders.\" But he indicated he wouldn't work for the administration, and cited a number of places where he differs with its policies, including expediting the bird flu vaccine (he ran against mandates regarding masking and the Covid-19 vaccine) and the administration's attack on free speech in the name of combating censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7554,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content":"\n

Climate responsibility firm F Minus will publish a report linking Harvard to Tesla <\/a>via a common lobbying firm, Tremont Strategies, and is calling on the University to distance itself from the lobbyists.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

F Minus, a 2023 climate accountability organization, releases lists of lobbying firms that represent both climate advocacy organizations and fossil fuel corporations to highlight the loyalties of these lobbying firms to conflicting client objectives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We apply all those tags in order to begin to tell the story of the ways in which the fossil fuel<\/a> lobbying these companies are doing is hurting some of their other clients, or working against what their other clients are attempting to achieve on climate,\" James Browning, director and founder of F Minus, explained. \"Then there's also an advocacy piece where we call on these other clients to drop these fossil fuel lobbying firms,\" he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tremont Strategies did not comment on requests. Musk, the billionaire Tesla CEO, also leads the Department of Government Efficiency. DOGE has eliminated over $60 million from the Environmental Protection Agency's budget since Trump was sworn in in January, and cancelled over 400 grants aimed at air and water quality and extreme weather resilience of communities nationwide.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Browning stated that in collaborating with lobbyist companies affiliated with Tesla, Harvard and other institutions are sanctioned the company's work with Musk. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're kind of normalizing and empowering this company to do business with Musk and DOGE who are among the largest threats on climate in general today,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Browning stated. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard representative Amy Kamosa did not respond to Harvard's collaboration with Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard is working<\/a> in association with Tremont Strategies presently on the Allston I-90 Multimodal Project, an infrastructure development project to replace existing highway ramps with a new grid system permitting development on University-owned land.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Meanwhile, Harvard has made its own climate commitments. Harvard aims to be fossil fuel neutral by 2026, according to the University's Sustainability Office. Browning indicated that he thinks it's \"incompatible with Harvard's values\" to hire Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

F Minus has effectively pushed universities to sever their relationships with lobbying companies previously. They pushed John Hopkins University out of its relationship with a \"coal lobbyist,\" Browning reports. But he acknowledged Harvard might be reluctant to switch lobbying companies since the I-90 project is still in planning stages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cole A. Cochrane '27, Policy Director of the Harvard Undergraduate Clean Energy Group, added that he wishes Harvard would sever its ties with Tremont Strategies to make a statement regarding their top \"interests, priorities, and principles.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"When you've got an institution like Harvard, say one thing and do another, I think that sends a double standard to the public and to other institutions, corporations or even academic institutions broadly in the United States,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Cochrane said <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're an example for not just the United States, but the world,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We ought not to have hypocrisy as an institution that is all about being honest.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Harvard faces pressure to drop fossil fuel-linked lobbying firm","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harvard-faces-pressure-to-drop-fossil-fuel-linked-lobbying-firm","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7554","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7561,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_content":"\n

Corporate America\u2019s strongest opponent is initiating a lobbying group focused on \u201clong-term corporate oversight\u201d of diversity policies in companies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robby Starbuck, labeled a boardroom boogeyman for pushing companies like Walmart, Lowe\u2019s, and Harley-Davidson to drop their DEI initiatives, informed Semafor about his intention to establish a lobbying group \u201cto make sure this never occurs again.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck said he has gotten a \u201cblank check\u201d offer from at least one big Republican donor. \u201cThe catch is: they want the ability to kill stories\u201d \u2014 Starbuck said he considers himself a journalist \u2014 \u201cand pick targets. And I just don\u2019t work that way.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In an extensive interview on his Tennessee farm, Starbuck looked back at his campaign, which started around X last year and has subsequently pushed huge overhauls in at least more than a dozen firms with a total market capitalization of over $2 trillion. His efforts are precise and his reach has been propagated by individuals such as Elon Musk<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I get along well with Elon,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he states \u2014 and far-right celebrities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His advances often begin with a LinkedIn message to the CEO, and he said he treats seriously the non-disclosure contracts he signs with companies in order to permit honest discussions. How honest? \"I can't tell you how many times I've had [CEOs] say, 'No way, we're not going to do that\u2026 and then, 'Oh, crap, we're going to do that.'\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated he's counseled some agency leaders as they seek to meet a White House directive to name DEI \"worst offenders.\" But he indicated he wouldn't work for the administration, and cited a number of places where he differs with its policies, including expediting the bird flu vaccine (he ran against mandates regarding masking and the Covid-19 vaccine) and the administration's attack on free speech in the name of combating censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7554,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content":"\n

Climate responsibility firm F Minus will publish a report linking Harvard to Tesla <\/a>via a common lobbying firm, Tremont Strategies, and is calling on the University to distance itself from the lobbyists.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

F Minus, a 2023 climate accountability organization, releases lists of lobbying firms that represent both climate advocacy organizations and fossil fuel corporations to highlight the loyalties of these lobbying firms to conflicting client objectives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We apply all those tags in order to begin to tell the story of the ways in which the fossil fuel<\/a> lobbying these companies are doing is hurting some of their other clients, or working against what their other clients are attempting to achieve on climate,\" James Browning, director and founder of F Minus, explained. \"Then there's also an advocacy piece where we call on these other clients to drop these fossil fuel lobbying firms,\" he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tremont Strategies did not comment on requests. Musk, the billionaire Tesla CEO, also leads the Department of Government Efficiency. DOGE has eliminated over $60 million from the Environmental Protection Agency's budget since Trump was sworn in in January, and cancelled over 400 grants aimed at air and water quality and extreme weather resilience of communities nationwide.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Browning stated that in collaborating with lobbyist companies affiliated with Tesla, Harvard and other institutions are sanctioned the company's work with Musk. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're kind of normalizing and empowering this company to do business with Musk and DOGE who are among the largest threats on climate in general today,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Browning stated. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard representative Amy Kamosa did not respond to Harvard's collaboration with Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard is working<\/a> in association with Tremont Strategies presently on the Allston I-90 Multimodal Project, an infrastructure development project to replace existing highway ramps with a new grid system permitting development on University-owned land.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Meanwhile, Harvard has made its own climate commitments. Harvard aims to be fossil fuel neutral by 2026, according to the University's Sustainability Office. Browning indicated that he thinks it's \"incompatible with Harvard's values\" to hire Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

F Minus has effectively pushed universities to sever their relationships with lobbying companies previously. They pushed John Hopkins University out of its relationship with a \"coal lobbyist,\" Browning reports. But he acknowledged Harvard might be reluctant to switch lobbying companies since the I-90 project is still in planning stages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cole A. Cochrane '27, Policy Director of the Harvard Undergraduate Clean Energy Group, added that he wishes Harvard would sever its ties with Tremont Strategies to make a statement regarding their top \"interests, priorities, and principles.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"When you've got an institution like Harvard, say one thing and do another, I think that sends a double standard to the public and to other institutions, corporations or even academic institutions broadly in the United States,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Cochrane said <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're an example for not just the United States, but the world,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We ought not to have hypocrisy as an institution that is all about being honest.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Harvard faces pressure to drop fossil fuel-linked lobbying firm","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harvard-faces-pressure-to-drop-fossil-fuel-linked-lobbying-firm","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7554","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7561,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_content":"\n

Corporate America\u2019s strongest opponent is initiating a lobbying group focused on \u201clong-term corporate oversight\u201d of diversity policies in companies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robby Starbuck, labeled a boardroom boogeyman for pushing companies like Walmart, Lowe\u2019s, and Harley-Davidson to drop their DEI initiatives, informed Semafor about his intention to establish a lobbying group \u201cto make sure this never occurs again.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck said he has gotten a \u201cblank check\u201d offer from at least one big Republican donor. \u201cThe catch is: they want the ability to kill stories\u201d \u2014 Starbuck said he considers himself a journalist \u2014 \u201cand pick targets. And I just don\u2019t work that way.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In an extensive interview on his Tennessee farm, Starbuck looked back at his campaign, which started around X last year and has subsequently pushed huge overhauls in at least more than a dozen firms with a total market capitalization of over $2 trillion. His efforts are precise and his reach has been propagated by individuals such as Elon Musk<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I get along well with Elon,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he states \u2014 and far-right celebrities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His advances often begin with a LinkedIn message to the CEO, and he said he treats seriously the non-disclosure contracts he signs with companies in order to permit honest discussions. How honest? \"I can't tell you how many times I've had [CEOs] say, 'No way, we're not going to do that\u2026 and then, 'Oh, crap, we're going to do that.'\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated he's counseled some agency leaders as they seek to meet a White House directive to name DEI \"worst offenders.\" But he indicated he wouldn't work for the administration, and cited a number of places where he differs with its policies, including expediting the bird flu vaccine (he ran against mandates regarding masking and the Covid-19 vaccine) and the administration's attack on free speech in the name of combating censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7554,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content":"\n

Climate responsibility firm F Minus will publish a report linking Harvard to Tesla <\/a>via a common lobbying firm, Tremont Strategies, and is calling on the University to distance itself from the lobbyists.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

F Minus, a 2023 climate accountability organization, releases lists of lobbying firms that represent both climate advocacy organizations and fossil fuel corporations to highlight the loyalties of these lobbying firms to conflicting client objectives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We apply all those tags in order to begin to tell the story of the ways in which the fossil fuel<\/a> lobbying these companies are doing is hurting some of their other clients, or working against what their other clients are attempting to achieve on climate,\" James Browning, director and founder of F Minus, explained. \"Then there's also an advocacy piece where we call on these other clients to drop these fossil fuel lobbying firms,\" he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tremont Strategies did not comment on requests. Musk, the billionaire Tesla CEO, also leads the Department of Government Efficiency. DOGE has eliminated over $60 million from the Environmental Protection Agency's budget since Trump was sworn in in January, and cancelled over 400 grants aimed at air and water quality and extreme weather resilience of communities nationwide.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Browning stated that in collaborating with lobbyist companies affiliated with Tesla, Harvard and other institutions are sanctioned the company's work with Musk. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're kind of normalizing and empowering this company to do business with Musk and DOGE who are among the largest threats on climate in general today,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Browning stated. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard representative Amy Kamosa did not respond to Harvard's collaboration with Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard is working<\/a> in association with Tremont Strategies presently on the Allston I-90 Multimodal Project, an infrastructure development project to replace existing highway ramps with a new grid system permitting development on University-owned land.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Meanwhile, Harvard has made its own climate commitments. Harvard aims to be fossil fuel neutral by 2026, according to the University's Sustainability Office. Browning indicated that he thinks it's \"incompatible with Harvard's values\" to hire Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

F Minus has effectively pushed universities to sever their relationships with lobbying companies previously. They pushed John Hopkins University out of its relationship with a \"coal lobbyist,\" Browning reports. But he acknowledged Harvard might be reluctant to switch lobbying companies since the I-90 project is still in planning stages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cole A. Cochrane '27, Policy Director of the Harvard Undergraduate Clean Energy Group, added that he wishes Harvard would sever its ties with Tremont Strategies to make a statement regarding their top \"interests, priorities, and principles.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"When you've got an institution like Harvard, say one thing and do another, I think that sends a double standard to the public and to other institutions, corporations or even academic institutions broadly in the United States,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Cochrane said <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're an example for not just the United States, but the world,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We ought not to have hypocrisy as an institution that is all about being honest.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Harvard faces pressure to drop fossil fuel-linked lobbying firm","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harvard-faces-pressure-to-drop-fossil-fuel-linked-lobbying-firm","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7554","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7561,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_content":"\n

Corporate America\u2019s strongest opponent is initiating a lobbying group focused on \u201clong-term corporate oversight\u201d of diversity policies in companies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robby Starbuck, labeled a boardroom boogeyman for pushing companies like Walmart, Lowe\u2019s, and Harley-Davidson to drop their DEI initiatives, informed Semafor about his intention to establish a lobbying group \u201cto make sure this never occurs again.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck said he has gotten a \u201cblank check\u201d offer from at least one big Republican donor. \u201cThe catch is: they want the ability to kill stories\u201d \u2014 Starbuck said he considers himself a journalist \u2014 \u201cand pick targets. And I just don\u2019t work that way.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In an extensive interview on his Tennessee farm, Starbuck looked back at his campaign, which started around X last year and has subsequently pushed huge overhauls in at least more than a dozen firms with a total market capitalization of over $2 trillion. His efforts are precise and his reach has been propagated by individuals such as Elon Musk<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I get along well with Elon,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he states \u2014 and far-right celebrities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His advances often begin with a LinkedIn message to the CEO, and he said he treats seriously the non-disclosure contracts he signs with companies in order to permit honest discussions. How honest? \"I can't tell you how many times I've had [CEOs] say, 'No way, we're not going to do that\u2026 and then, 'Oh, crap, we're going to do that.'\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated he's counseled some agency leaders as they seek to meet a White House directive to name DEI \"worst offenders.\" But he indicated he wouldn't work for the administration, and cited a number of places where he differs with its policies, including expediting the bird flu vaccine (he ran against mandates regarding masking and the Covid-19 vaccine) and the administration's attack on free speech in the name of combating censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7554,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content":"\n

Climate responsibility firm F Minus will publish a report linking Harvard to Tesla <\/a>via a common lobbying firm, Tremont Strategies, and is calling on the University to distance itself from the lobbyists.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

F Minus, a 2023 climate accountability organization, releases lists of lobbying firms that represent both climate advocacy organizations and fossil fuel corporations to highlight the loyalties of these lobbying firms to conflicting client objectives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We apply all those tags in order to begin to tell the story of the ways in which the fossil fuel<\/a> lobbying these companies are doing is hurting some of their other clients, or working against what their other clients are attempting to achieve on climate,\" James Browning, director and founder of F Minus, explained. \"Then there's also an advocacy piece where we call on these other clients to drop these fossil fuel lobbying firms,\" he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tremont Strategies did not comment on requests. Musk, the billionaire Tesla CEO, also leads the Department of Government Efficiency. DOGE has eliminated over $60 million from the Environmental Protection Agency's budget since Trump was sworn in in January, and cancelled over 400 grants aimed at air and water quality and extreme weather resilience of communities nationwide.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Browning stated that in collaborating with lobbyist companies affiliated with Tesla, Harvard and other institutions are sanctioned the company's work with Musk. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're kind of normalizing and empowering this company to do business with Musk and DOGE who are among the largest threats on climate in general today,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Browning stated. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard representative Amy Kamosa did not respond to Harvard's collaboration with Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard is working<\/a> in association with Tremont Strategies presently on the Allston I-90 Multimodal Project, an infrastructure development project to replace existing highway ramps with a new grid system permitting development on University-owned land.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Meanwhile, Harvard has made its own climate commitments. Harvard aims to be fossil fuel neutral by 2026, according to the University's Sustainability Office. Browning indicated that he thinks it's \"incompatible with Harvard's values\" to hire Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

F Minus has effectively pushed universities to sever their relationships with lobbying companies previously. They pushed John Hopkins University out of its relationship with a \"coal lobbyist,\" Browning reports. But he acknowledged Harvard might be reluctant to switch lobbying companies since the I-90 project is still in planning stages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cole A. Cochrane '27, Policy Director of the Harvard Undergraduate Clean Energy Group, added that he wishes Harvard would sever its ties with Tremont Strategies to make a statement regarding their top \"interests, priorities, and principles.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"When you've got an institution like Harvard, say one thing and do another, I think that sends a double standard to the public and to other institutions, corporations or even academic institutions broadly in the United States,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Cochrane said <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're an example for not just the United States, but the world,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We ought not to have hypocrisy as an institution that is all about being honest.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Harvard faces pressure to drop fossil fuel-linked lobbying firm","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harvard-faces-pressure-to-drop-fossil-fuel-linked-lobbying-firm","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7554","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7561,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_content":"\n

Corporate America\u2019s strongest opponent is initiating a lobbying group focused on \u201clong-term corporate oversight\u201d of diversity policies in companies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robby Starbuck, labeled a boardroom boogeyman for pushing companies like Walmart, Lowe\u2019s, and Harley-Davidson to drop their DEI initiatives, informed Semafor about his intention to establish a lobbying group \u201cto make sure this never occurs again.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck said he has gotten a \u201cblank check\u201d offer from at least one big Republican donor. \u201cThe catch is: they want the ability to kill stories\u201d \u2014 Starbuck said he considers himself a journalist \u2014 \u201cand pick targets. And I just don\u2019t work that way.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In an extensive interview on his Tennessee farm, Starbuck looked back at his campaign, which started around X last year and has subsequently pushed huge overhauls in at least more than a dozen firms with a total market capitalization of over $2 trillion. His efforts are precise and his reach has been propagated by individuals such as Elon Musk<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I get along well with Elon,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he states \u2014 and far-right celebrities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His advances often begin with a LinkedIn message to the CEO, and he said he treats seriously the non-disclosure contracts he signs with companies in order to permit honest discussions. How honest? \"I can't tell you how many times I've had [CEOs] say, 'No way, we're not going to do that\u2026 and then, 'Oh, crap, we're going to do that.'\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated he's counseled some agency leaders as they seek to meet a White House directive to name DEI \"worst offenders.\" But he indicated he wouldn't work for the administration, and cited a number of places where he differs with its policies, including expediting the bird flu vaccine (he ran against mandates regarding masking and the Covid-19 vaccine) and the administration's attack on free speech in the name of combating censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7554,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content":"\n

Climate responsibility firm F Minus will publish a report linking Harvard to Tesla <\/a>via a common lobbying firm, Tremont Strategies, and is calling on the University to distance itself from the lobbyists.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

F Minus, a 2023 climate accountability organization, releases lists of lobbying firms that represent both climate advocacy organizations and fossil fuel corporations to highlight the loyalties of these lobbying firms to conflicting client objectives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We apply all those tags in order to begin to tell the story of the ways in which the fossil fuel<\/a> lobbying these companies are doing is hurting some of their other clients, or working against what their other clients are attempting to achieve on climate,\" James Browning, director and founder of F Minus, explained. \"Then there's also an advocacy piece where we call on these other clients to drop these fossil fuel lobbying firms,\" he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tremont Strategies did not comment on requests. Musk, the billionaire Tesla CEO, also leads the Department of Government Efficiency. DOGE has eliminated over $60 million from the Environmental Protection Agency's budget since Trump was sworn in in January, and cancelled over 400 grants aimed at air and water quality and extreme weather resilience of communities nationwide.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Browning stated that in collaborating with lobbyist companies affiliated with Tesla, Harvard and other institutions are sanctioned the company's work with Musk. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're kind of normalizing and empowering this company to do business with Musk and DOGE who are among the largest threats on climate in general today,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Browning stated. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard representative Amy Kamosa did not respond to Harvard's collaboration with Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard is working<\/a> in association with Tremont Strategies presently on the Allston I-90 Multimodal Project, an infrastructure development project to replace existing highway ramps with a new grid system permitting development on University-owned land.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Meanwhile, Harvard has made its own climate commitments. Harvard aims to be fossil fuel neutral by 2026, according to the University's Sustainability Office. Browning indicated that he thinks it's \"incompatible with Harvard's values\" to hire Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

F Minus has effectively pushed universities to sever their relationships with lobbying companies previously. They pushed John Hopkins University out of its relationship with a \"coal lobbyist,\" Browning reports. But he acknowledged Harvard might be reluctant to switch lobbying companies since the I-90 project is still in planning stages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cole A. Cochrane '27, Policy Director of the Harvard Undergraduate Clean Energy Group, added that he wishes Harvard would sever its ties with Tremont Strategies to make a statement regarding their top \"interests, priorities, and principles.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"When you've got an institution like Harvard, say one thing and do another, I think that sends a double standard to the public and to other institutions, corporations or even academic institutions broadly in the United States,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Cochrane said <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're an example for not just the United States, but the world,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We ought not to have hypocrisy as an institution that is all about being honest.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Harvard faces pressure to drop fossil fuel-linked lobbying firm","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harvard-faces-pressure-to-drop-fossil-fuel-linked-lobbying-firm","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7554","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7561,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_content":"\n

Corporate America\u2019s strongest opponent is initiating a lobbying group focused on \u201clong-term corporate oversight\u201d of diversity policies in companies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robby Starbuck, labeled a boardroom boogeyman for pushing companies like Walmart, Lowe\u2019s, and Harley-Davidson to drop their DEI initiatives, informed Semafor about his intention to establish a lobbying group \u201cto make sure this never occurs again.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck said he has gotten a \u201cblank check\u201d offer from at least one big Republican donor. \u201cThe catch is: they want the ability to kill stories\u201d \u2014 Starbuck said he considers himself a journalist \u2014 \u201cand pick targets. And I just don\u2019t work that way.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In an extensive interview on his Tennessee farm, Starbuck looked back at his campaign, which started around X last year and has subsequently pushed huge overhauls in at least more than a dozen firms with a total market capitalization of over $2 trillion. His efforts are precise and his reach has been propagated by individuals such as Elon Musk<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I get along well with Elon,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he states \u2014 and far-right celebrities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His advances often begin with a LinkedIn message to the CEO, and he said he treats seriously the non-disclosure contracts he signs with companies in order to permit honest discussions. How honest? \"I can't tell you how many times I've had [CEOs] say, 'No way, we're not going to do that\u2026 and then, 'Oh, crap, we're going to do that.'\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated he's counseled some agency leaders as they seek to meet a White House directive to name DEI \"worst offenders.\" But he indicated he wouldn't work for the administration, and cited a number of places where he differs with its policies, including expediting the bird flu vaccine (he ran against mandates regarding masking and the Covid-19 vaccine) and the administration's attack on free speech in the name of combating censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7554,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content":"\n

Climate responsibility firm F Minus will publish a report linking Harvard to Tesla <\/a>via a common lobbying firm, Tremont Strategies, and is calling on the University to distance itself from the lobbyists.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

F Minus, a 2023 climate accountability organization, releases lists of lobbying firms that represent both climate advocacy organizations and fossil fuel corporations to highlight the loyalties of these lobbying firms to conflicting client objectives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We apply all those tags in order to begin to tell the story of the ways in which the fossil fuel<\/a> lobbying these companies are doing is hurting some of their other clients, or working against what their other clients are attempting to achieve on climate,\" James Browning, director and founder of F Minus, explained. \"Then there's also an advocacy piece where we call on these other clients to drop these fossil fuel lobbying firms,\" he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tremont Strategies did not comment on requests. Musk, the billionaire Tesla CEO, also leads the Department of Government Efficiency. DOGE has eliminated over $60 million from the Environmental Protection Agency's budget since Trump was sworn in in January, and cancelled over 400 grants aimed at air and water quality and extreme weather resilience of communities nationwide.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Browning stated that in collaborating with lobbyist companies affiliated with Tesla, Harvard and other institutions are sanctioned the company's work with Musk. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're kind of normalizing and empowering this company to do business with Musk and DOGE who are among the largest threats on climate in general today,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Browning stated. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard representative Amy Kamosa did not respond to Harvard's collaboration with Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard is working<\/a> in association with Tremont Strategies presently on the Allston I-90 Multimodal Project, an infrastructure development project to replace existing highway ramps with a new grid system permitting development on University-owned land.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Meanwhile, Harvard has made its own climate commitments. Harvard aims to be fossil fuel neutral by 2026, according to the University's Sustainability Office. Browning indicated that he thinks it's \"incompatible with Harvard's values\" to hire Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

F Minus has effectively pushed universities to sever their relationships with lobbying companies previously. They pushed John Hopkins University out of its relationship with a \"coal lobbyist,\" Browning reports. But he acknowledged Harvard might be reluctant to switch lobbying companies since the I-90 project is still in planning stages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cole A. Cochrane '27, Policy Director of the Harvard Undergraduate Clean Energy Group, added that he wishes Harvard would sever its ties with Tremont Strategies to make a statement regarding their top \"interests, priorities, and principles.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"When you've got an institution like Harvard, say one thing and do another, I think that sends a double standard to the public and to other institutions, corporations or even academic institutions broadly in the United States,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Cochrane said <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're an example for not just the United States, but the world,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We ought not to have hypocrisy as an institution that is all about being honest.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Harvard faces pressure to drop fossil fuel-linked lobbying firm","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harvard-faces-pressure-to-drop-fossil-fuel-linked-lobbying-firm","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7554","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7561,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_content":"\n

Corporate America\u2019s strongest opponent is initiating a lobbying group focused on \u201clong-term corporate oversight\u201d of diversity policies in companies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robby Starbuck, labeled a boardroom boogeyman for pushing companies like Walmart, Lowe\u2019s, and Harley-Davidson to drop their DEI initiatives, informed Semafor about his intention to establish a lobbying group \u201cto make sure this never occurs again.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck said he has gotten a \u201cblank check\u201d offer from at least one big Republican donor. \u201cThe catch is: they want the ability to kill stories\u201d \u2014 Starbuck said he considers himself a journalist \u2014 \u201cand pick targets. And I just don\u2019t work that way.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In an extensive interview on his Tennessee farm, Starbuck looked back at his campaign, which started around X last year and has subsequently pushed huge overhauls in at least more than a dozen firms with a total market capitalization of over $2 trillion. His efforts are precise and his reach has been propagated by individuals such as Elon Musk<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I get along well with Elon,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he states \u2014 and far-right celebrities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His advances often begin with a LinkedIn message to the CEO, and he said he treats seriously the non-disclosure contracts he signs with companies in order to permit honest discussions. How honest? \"I can't tell you how many times I've had [CEOs] say, 'No way, we're not going to do that\u2026 and then, 'Oh, crap, we're going to do that.'\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated he's counseled some agency leaders as they seek to meet a White House directive to name DEI \"worst offenders.\" But he indicated he wouldn't work for the administration, and cited a number of places where he differs with its policies, including expediting the bird flu vaccine (he ran against mandates regarding masking and the Covid-19 vaccine) and the administration's attack on free speech in the name of combating censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7554,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content":"\n

Climate responsibility firm F Minus will publish a report linking Harvard to Tesla <\/a>via a common lobbying firm, Tremont Strategies, and is calling on the University to distance itself from the lobbyists.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

F Minus, a 2023 climate accountability organization, releases lists of lobbying firms that represent both climate advocacy organizations and fossil fuel corporations to highlight the loyalties of these lobbying firms to conflicting client objectives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We apply all those tags in order to begin to tell the story of the ways in which the fossil fuel<\/a> lobbying these companies are doing is hurting some of their other clients, or working against what their other clients are attempting to achieve on climate,\" James Browning, director and founder of F Minus, explained. \"Then there's also an advocacy piece where we call on these other clients to drop these fossil fuel lobbying firms,\" he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tremont Strategies did not comment on requests. Musk, the billionaire Tesla CEO, also leads the Department of Government Efficiency. DOGE has eliminated over $60 million from the Environmental Protection Agency's budget since Trump was sworn in in January, and cancelled over 400 grants aimed at air and water quality and extreme weather resilience of communities nationwide.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Browning stated that in collaborating with lobbyist companies affiliated with Tesla, Harvard and other institutions are sanctioned the company's work with Musk. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're kind of normalizing and empowering this company to do business with Musk and DOGE who are among the largest threats on climate in general today,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Browning stated. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard representative Amy Kamosa did not respond to Harvard's collaboration with Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard is working<\/a> in association with Tremont Strategies presently on the Allston I-90 Multimodal Project, an infrastructure development project to replace existing highway ramps with a new grid system permitting development on University-owned land.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Meanwhile, Harvard has made its own climate commitments. Harvard aims to be fossil fuel neutral by 2026, according to the University's Sustainability Office. Browning indicated that he thinks it's \"incompatible with Harvard's values\" to hire Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

F Minus has effectively pushed universities to sever their relationships with lobbying companies previously. They pushed John Hopkins University out of its relationship with a \"coal lobbyist,\" Browning reports. But he acknowledged Harvard might be reluctant to switch lobbying companies since the I-90 project is still in planning stages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cole A. Cochrane '27, Policy Director of the Harvard Undergraduate Clean Energy Group, added that he wishes Harvard would sever its ties with Tremont Strategies to make a statement regarding their top \"interests, priorities, and principles.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"When you've got an institution like Harvard, say one thing and do another, I think that sends a double standard to the public and to other institutions, corporations or even academic institutions broadly in the United States,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Cochrane said <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're an example for not just the United States, but the world,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We ought not to have hypocrisy as an institution that is all about being honest.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Harvard faces pressure to drop fossil fuel-linked lobbying firm","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harvard-faces-pressure-to-drop-fossil-fuel-linked-lobbying-firm","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7554","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7561,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_content":"\n

Corporate America\u2019s strongest opponent is initiating a lobbying group focused on \u201clong-term corporate oversight\u201d of diversity policies in companies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robby Starbuck, labeled a boardroom boogeyman for pushing companies like Walmart, Lowe\u2019s, and Harley-Davidson to drop their DEI initiatives, informed Semafor about his intention to establish a lobbying group \u201cto make sure this never occurs again.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck said he has gotten a \u201cblank check\u201d offer from at least one big Republican donor. \u201cThe catch is: they want the ability to kill stories\u201d \u2014 Starbuck said he considers himself a journalist \u2014 \u201cand pick targets. And I just don\u2019t work that way.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In an extensive interview on his Tennessee farm, Starbuck looked back at his campaign, which started around X last year and has subsequently pushed huge overhauls in at least more than a dozen firms with a total market capitalization of over $2 trillion. His efforts are precise and his reach has been propagated by individuals such as Elon Musk<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I get along well with Elon,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he states \u2014 and far-right celebrities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His advances often begin with a LinkedIn message to the CEO, and he said he treats seriously the non-disclosure contracts he signs with companies in order to permit honest discussions. How honest? \"I can't tell you how many times I've had [CEOs] say, 'No way, we're not going to do that\u2026 and then, 'Oh, crap, we're going to do that.'\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated he's counseled some agency leaders as they seek to meet a White House directive to name DEI \"worst offenders.\" But he indicated he wouldn't work for the administration, and cited a number of places where he differs with its policies, including expediting the bird flu vaccine (he ran against mandates regarding masking and the Covid-19 vaccine) and the administration's attack on free speech in the name of combating censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7554,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content":"\n

Climate responsibility firm F Minus will publish a report linking Harvard to Tesla <\/a>via a common lobbying firm, Tremont Strategies, and is calling on the University to distance itself from the lobbyists.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

F Minus, a 2023 climate accountability organization, releases lists of lobbying firms that represent both climate advocacy organizations and fossil fuel corporations to highlight the loyalties of these lobbying firms to conflicting client objectives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We apply all those tags in order to begin to tell the story of the ways in which the fossil fuel<\/a> lobbying these companies are doing is hurting some of their other clients, or working against what their other clients are attempting to achieve on climate,\" James Browning, director and founder of F Minus, explained. \"Then there's also an advocacy piece where we call on these other clients to drop these fossil fuel lobbying firms,\" he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tremont Strategies did not comment on requests. Musk, the billionaire Tesla CEO, also leads the Department of Government Efficiency. DOGE has eliminated over $60 million from the Environmental Protection Agency's budget since Trump was sworn in in January, and cancelled over 400 grants aimed at air and water quality and extreme weather resilience of communities nationwide.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Browning stated that in collaborating with lobbyist companies affiliated with Tesla, Harvard and other institutions are sanctioned the company's work with Musk. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're kind of normalizing and empowering this company to do business with Musk and DOGE who are among the largest threats on climate in general today,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Browning stated. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard representative Amy Kamosa did not respond to Harvard's collaboration with Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard is working<\/a> in association with Tremont Strategies presently on the Allston I-90 Multimodal Project, an infrastructure development project to replace existing highway ramps with a new grid system permitting development on University-owned land.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Meanwhile, Harvard has made its own climate commitments. Harvard aims to be fossil fuel neutral by 2026, according to the University's Sustainability Office. Browning indicated that he thinks it's \"incompatible with Harvard's values\" to hire Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

F Minus has effectively pushed universities to sever their relationships with lobbying companies previously. They pushed John Hopkins University out of its relationship with a \"coal lobbyist,\" Browning reports. But he acknowledged Harvard might be reluctant to switch lobbying companies since the I-90 project is still in planning stages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cole A. Cochrane '27, Policy Director of the Harvard Undergraduate Clean Energy Group, added that he wishes Harvard would sever its ties with Tremont Strategies to make a statement regarding their top \"interests, priorities, and principles.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"When you've got an institution like Harvard, say one thing and do another, I think that sends a double standard to the public and to other institutions, corporations or even academic institutions broadly in the United States,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Cochrane said <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're an example for not just the United States, but the world,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We ought not to have hypocrisy as an institution that is all about being honest.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Harvard faces pressure to drop fossil fuel-linked lobbying firm","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harvard-faces-pressure-to-drop-fossil-fuel-linked-lobbying-firm","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7554","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7561,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_content":"\n

Corporate America\u2019s strongest opponent is initiating a lobbying group focused on \u201clong-term corporate oversight\u201d of diversity policies in companies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robby Starbuck, labeled a boardroom boogeyman for pushing companies like Walmart, Lowe\u2019s, and Harley-Davidson to drop their DEI initiatives, informed Semafor about his intention to establish a lobbying group \u201cto make sure this never occurs again.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck said he has gotten a \u201cblank check\u201d offer from at least one big Republican donor. \u201cThe catch is: they want the ability to kill stories\u201d \u2014 Starbuck said he considers himself a journalist \u2014 \u201cand pick targets. And I just don\u2019t work that way.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In an extensive interview on his Tennessee farm, Starbuck looked back at his campaign, which started around X last year and has subsequently pushed huge overhauls in at least more than a dozen firms with a total market capitalization of over $2 trillion. His efforts are precise and his reach has been propagated by individuals such as Elon Musk<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I get along well with Elon,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he states \u2014 and far-right celebrities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His advances often begin with a LinkedIn message to the CEO, and he said he treats seriously the non-disclosure contracts he signs with companies in order to permit honest discussions. How honest? \"I can't tell you how many times I've had [CEOs] say, 'No way, we're not going to do that\u2026 and then, 'Oh, crap, we're going to do that.'\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated he's counseled some agency leaders as they seek to meet a White House directive to name DEI \"worst offenders.\" But he indicated he wouldn't work for the administration, and cited a number of places where he differs with its policies, including expediting the bird flu vaccine (he ran against mandates regarding masking and the Covid-19 vaccine) and the administration's attack on free speech in the name of combating censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7554,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content":"\n

Climate responsibility firm F Minus will publish a report linking Harvard to Tesla <\/a>via a common lobbying firm, Tremont Strategies, and is calling on the University to distance itself from the lobbyists.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

F Minus, a 2023 climate accountability organization, releases lists of lobbying firms that represent both climate advocacy organizations and fossil fuel corporations to highlight the loyalties of these lobbying firms to conflicting client objectives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We apply all those tags in order to begin to tell the story of the ways in which the fossil fuel<\/a> lobbying these companies are doing is hurting some of their other clients, or working against what their other clients are attempting to achieve on climate,\" James Browning, director and founder of F Minus, explained. \"Then there's also an advocacy piece where we call on these other clients to drop these fossil fuel lobbying firms,\" he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tremont Strategies did not comment on requests. Musk, the billionaire Tesla CEO, also leads the Department of Government Efficiency. DOGE has eliminated over $60 million from the Environmental Protection Agency's budget since Trump was sworn in in January, and cancelled over 400 grants aimed at air and water quality and extreme weather resilience of communities nationwide.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Browning stated that in collaborating with lobbyist companies affiliated with Tesla, Harvard and other institutions are sanctioned the company's work with Musk. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're kind of normalizing and empowering this company to do business with Musk and DOGE who are among the largest threats on climate in general today,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Browning stated. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard representative Amy Kamosa did not respond to Harvard's collaboration with Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard is working<\/a> in association with Tremont Strategies presently on the Allston I-90 Multimodal Project, an infrastructure development project to replace existing highway ramps with a new grid system permitting development on University-owned land.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Meanwhile, Harvard has made its own climate commitments. Harvard aims to be fossil fuel neutral by 2026, according to the University's Sustainability Office. Browning indicated that he thinks it's \"incompatible with Harvard's values\" to hire Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

F Minus has effectively pushed universities to sever their relationships with lobbying companies previously. They pushed John Hopkins University out of its relationship with a \"coal lobbyist,\" Browning reports. But he acknowledged Harvard might be reluctant to switch lobbying companies since the I-90 project is still in planning stages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cole A. Cochrane '27, Policy Director of the Harvard Undergraduate Clean Energy Group, added that he wishes Harvard would sever its ties with Tremont Strategies to make a statement regarding their top \"interests, priorities, and principles.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"When you've got an institution like Harvard, say one thing and do another, I think that sends a double standard to the public and to other institutions, corporations or even academic institutions broadly in the United States,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Cochrane said <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're an example for not just the United States, but the world,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We ought not to have hypocrisy as an institution that is all about being honest.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Harvard faces pressure to drop fossil fuel-linked lobbying firm","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harvard-faces-pressure-to-drop-fossil-fuel-linked-lobbying-firm","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7554","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7561,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_content":"\n

Corporate America\u2019s strongest opponent is initiating a lobbying group focused on \u201clong-term corporate oversight\u201d of diversity policies in companies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robby Starbuck, labeled a boardroom boogeyman for pushing companies like Walmart, Lowe\u2019s, and Harley-Davidson to drop their DEI initiatives, informed Semafor about his intention to establish a lobbying group \u201cto make sure this never occurs again.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck said he has gotten a \u201cblank check\u201d offer from at least one big Republican donor. \u201cThe catch is: they want the ability to kill stories\u201d \u2014 Starbuck said he considers himself a journalist \u2014 \u201cand pick targets. And I just don\u2019t work that way.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In an extensive interview on his Tennessee farm, Starbuck looked back at his campaign, which started around X last year and has subsequently pushed huge overhauls in at least more than a dozen firms with a total market capitalization of over $2 trillion. His efforts are precise and his reach has been propagated by individuals such as Elon Musk<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I get along well with Elon,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he states \u2014 and far-right celebrities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His advances often begin with a LinkedIn message to the CEO, and he said he treats seriously the non-disclosure contracts he signs with companies in order to permit honest discussions. How honest? \"I can't tell you how many times I've had [CEOs] say, 'No way, we're not going to do that\u2026 and then, 'Oh, crap, we're going to do that.'\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated he's counseled some agency leaders as they seek to meet a White House directive to name DEI \"worst offenders.\" But he indicated he wouldn't work for the administration, and cited a number of places where he differs with its policies, including expediting the bird flu vaccine (he ran against mandates regarding masking and the Covid-19 vaccine) and the administration's attack on free speech in the name of combating censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7554,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content":"\n

Climate responsibility firm F Minus will publish a report linking Harvard to Tesla <\/a>via a common lobbying firm, Tremont Strategies, and is calling on the University to distance itself from the lobbyists.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

F Minus, a 2023 climate accountability organization, releases lists of lobbying firms that represent both climate advocacy organizations and fossil fuel corporations to highlight the loyalties of these lobbying firms to conflicting client objectives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We apply all those tags in order to begin to tell the story of the ways in which the fossil fuel<\/a> lobbying these companies are doing is hurting some of their other clients, or working against what their other clients are attempting to achieve on climate,\" James Browning, director and founder of F Minus, explained. \"Then there's also an advocacy piece where we call on these other clients to drop these fossil fuel lobbying firms,\" he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tremont Strategies did not comment on requests. Musk, the billionaire Tesla CEO, also leads the Department of Government Efficiency. DOGE has eliminated over $60 million from the Environmental Protection Agency's budget since Trump was sworn in in January, and cancelled over 400 grants aimed at air and water quality and extreme weather resilience of communities nationwide.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Browning stated that in collaborating with lobbyist companies affiliated with Tesla, Harvard and other institutions are sanctioned the company's work with Musk. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're kind of normalizing and empowering this company to do business with Musk and DOGE who are among the largest threats on climate in general today,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Browning stated. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard representative Amy Kamosa did not respond to Harvard's collaboration with Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard is working<\/a> in association with Tremont Strategies presently on the Allston I-90 Multimodal Project, an infrastructure development project to replace existing highway ramps with a new grid system permitting development on University-owned land.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Meanwhile, Harvard has made its own climate commitments. Harvard aims to be fossil fuel neutral by 2026, according to the University's Sustainability Office. Browning indicated that he thinks it's \"incompatible with Harvard's values\" to hire Tremont Strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

F Minus has effectively pushed universities to sever their relationships with lobbying companies previously. They pushed John Hopkins University out of its relationship with a \"coal lobbyist,\" Browning reports. But he acknowledged Harvard might be reluctant to switch lobbying companies since the I-90 project is still in planning stages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cole A. Cochrane '27, Policy Director of the Harvard Undergraduate Clean Energy Group, added that he wishes Harvard would sever its ties with Tremont Strategies to make a statement regarding their top \"interests, priorities, and principles.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"When you've got an institution like Harvard, say one thing and do another, I think that sends a double standard to the public and to other institutions, corporations or even academic institutions broadly in the United States,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Cochrane said <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"They're an example for not just the United States, but the world,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We ought not to have hypocrisy as an institution that is all about being honest.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Harvard faces pressure to drop fossil fuel-linked lobbying firm","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"harvard-faces-pressure-to-drop-fossil-fuel-linked-lobbying-firm","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 18:44:07","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7554","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7561,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-17 20:30:02","post_content":"\n

Corporate America\u2019s strongest opponent is initiating a lobbying group focused on \u201clong-term corporate oversight\u201d of diversity policies in companies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robby Starbuck, labeled a boardroom boogeyman for pushing companies like Walmart, Lowe\u2019s, and Harley-Davidson to drop their DEI initiatives, informed Semafor about his intention to establish a lobbying group \u201cto make sure this never occurs again.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck said he has gotten a \u201cblank check\u201d offer from at least one big Republican donor. \u201cThe catch is: they want the ability to kill stories\u201d \u2014 Starbuck said he considers himself a journalist \u2014 \u201cand pick targets. And I just don\u2019t work that way.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In an extensive interview on his Tennessee farm, Starbuck looked back at his campaign, which started around X last year and has subsequently pushed huge overhauls in at least more than a dozen firms with a total market capitalization of over $2 trillion. His efforts are precise and his reach has been propagated by individuals such as Elon Musk<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I get along well with Elon,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he states \u2014 and far-right celebrities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His advances often begin with a LinkedIn message to the CEO, and he said he treats seriously the non-disclosure contracts he signs with companies in order to permit honest discussions. How honest? \"I can't tell you how many times I've had [CEOs] say, 'No way, we're not going to do that\u2026 and then, 'Oh, crap, we're going to do that.'\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated he's counseled some agency leaders as they seek to meet a White House directive to name DEI \"worst offenders.\" But he indicated he wouldn't work for the administration, and cited a number of places where he differs with its policies, including expediting the bird flu vaccine (he ran against mandates regarding masking and the Covid-19 vaccine) and the administration's attack on free speech in the name of combating censorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They need to be careful with that,\" he said. \"If it's individuals doing nasty things, seizing schools, sure, go ahead\u2026 but you need to set precedent that you will be fine with down the road.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starbuck indicated that he's advocating for \"corporate neutrality\" alone. \"I don't want to make the Fortune 500 <\/a>right-wing companies,\" he stated. He indicated that he's attempting to avoid \"a situation where we have totally parallel economies,\" with blue brands and red brands, because \"it's going to hurt our economy, and it's going to hurt our country.\"<\/p>\n","post_title":"Robby Starbuck plans lobbying group to challenge corporate DEI policies","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"robby-starbuck-plans-lobbying-group-to-challenge-corporate-dei-policies","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-18 20:35:48","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7561","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7546,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content":"\n

An activist investor has asked IBM to report on its lobbying activities, which he claims involve the expenditure of \"dark money\" on groups that campaign against climate change reporting and bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In advance of IBM's April 29 annual meeting of stockholders, Big Blue shareholder and activist investor John Chevedden filed a letter<\/a> this week through the Securities and Exchange Commission urging fellow investors to support a proposal that would urge IBM to \"improve\" its lobbying disclosure, both directly to the government and, allegedly, through \"dark money.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter criticises IBM's disclosure of lobbying as insufficient and risky to shareholders. \"Dark money\" spending on trade associations and social welfare organisations poses unidentified dangers, he says, and urges IBM to include information on its lobbying in a shareholder annual report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, IBM belongs to the Business Roundtable that has been in opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules requiring disclosure of climate risk. IBM also belongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which is said to be a \"central actor\" in discouraging climate legislation for two decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, IBM claims it wishes to reduce the risk of climate change. In its 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, it reported that IBM had been \"committed for decades to addressing climate change through the company's energy conservation and climate protection programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements over spending on business associations imply companies can donate limitless sums to independent groups who then spend<\/a> millions engaging in lobbying as well as frequent, not-yet-disclosed grassroots efforts, the letter maintains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden states, \"IBM stockholders are a victim of a trade association blind spot, because IBM does not disclose its trade association payments, nor the percentage of these payments spent on lobbying<\/a>. IBM's memberships in 13 trade associations, such as the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce, have collectively spent more than $2.3 billion in federal lobbying since 1998. But stockholders have no way of knowing how much of IBM's payments to each is spent on lobbying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In lobbying to US Federal Government, IBM invested $78.2 million between 2010 and 2024, and $22.2 million between 2021 and 2024, the letter adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lobbying on a state level is less transparent. Chevedden's letter states that 98 percent of the S&P 500 did not report state-specific lobbying figures to stockholders, a 2023 study found. In California alone, where it is required to disclose, IBM spent $1.28 million between 2010 and 2024 on lobbying, it states. \"IBM's existing lobbying disclosures are insufficient to safeguard stockholder interests,\" the letter asserts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chevedden has spent decades agitating the US corporate titans such as General Motors, eBay, and Google on their governance. While critics say such efforts are a waste of time, his proposals have passed shareholder approval at Netflix and Texas Instruments, reports say.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Shareholder says IBM\u2019s lobbying lacks transparency & oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"shareholder-says-ibms-lobbying-lacks-transparency-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-14 19:46:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7546","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":44},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

Page 44 of 72 1 43 44 45 72