\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Trent Morse, another Ballard alum, is the deputy director of personnel for Trump. The Florida origins of the firm also result in Ballard having ties to the Floridians who hold sway in Trump's Washington, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Trump fundraiser\u2019s lobbying firm triples earnings mid washington power shift","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trump-fundraisers-lobbying-firm-triples-earnings-mid-washington-power-shift","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7583","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7576,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_content":"\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Some of Ballard's ex-lobbyists now carry senior positions in Trump's second administration, including Pam Bondi, Attorney General and Susie Wiles, White House chief of staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trent Morse, another Ballard alum, is the deputy director of personnel for Trump. The Florida origins of the firm also result in Ballard having ties to the Floridians who hold sway in Trump's Washington, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Trump fundraiser\u2019s lobbying firm triples earnings mid washington power shift","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trump-fundraisers-lobbying-firm-triples-earnings-mid-washington-power-shift","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7583","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7576,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_content":"\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

The company also signed up to lobby on behalf of a number of individuals and organizations targeted for punishment by the Trump administration, including the Harvard University governing board, the Public Broadcasting Service and law organization Kirkland & Ellis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some of Ballard's ex-lobbyists now carry senior positions in Trump's second administration, including Pam Bondi, Attorney General and Susie Wiles, White House chief of staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trent Morse, another Ballard alum, is the deputy director of personnel for Trump. The Florida origins of the firm also result in Ballard having ties to the Floridians who hold sway in Trump's Washington, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Trump fundraiser\u2019s lobbying firm triples earnings mid washington power shift","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trump-fundraisers-lobbying-firm-triples-earnings-mid-washington-power-shift","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7583","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7576,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_content":"\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

But Ballard has revealed over 130 new lobbying clients since Election Day alone, including JPMorgan Chase, Chevron, Palantir, Netflix, Ripple Labs and the Business Roundtable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company also signed up to lobby on behalf of a number of individuals and organizations targeted for punishment by the Trump administration, including the Harvard University governing board, the Public Broadcasting Service and law organization Kirkland & Ellis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some of Ballard's ex-lobbyists now carry senior positions in Trump's second administration, including Pam Bondi, Attorney General and Susie Wiles, White House chief of staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trent Morse, another Ballard alum, is the deputy director of personnel for Trump. The Florida origins of the firm also result in Ballard having ties to the Floridians who hold sway in Trump's Washington, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Trump fundraiser\u2019s lobbying firm triples earnings mid washington power shift","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trump-fundraisers-lobbying-firm-triples-earnings-mid-washington-power-shift","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7583","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7576,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_content":"\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

But that rhythm went into overdrive leading up to Trump's second term. Ballard, along with a few other companies with strong connections to the administration, such as Miller Strategies, Mercury Public Affairs, Michael Best Strategies and Continental Strategies, have experienced a wave of new clients since November. Those players did not return requests for their first quarter figures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Ballard has revealed over 130 new lobbying clients since Election Day alone, including JPMorgan Chase, Chevron, Palantir, Netflix, Ripple Labs and the Business Roundtable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company also signed up to lobby on behalf of a number of individuals and organizations targeted for punishment by the Trump administration, including the Harvard University governing board, the Public Broadcasting Service and law organization Kirkland & Ellis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some of Ballard's ex-lobbyists now carry senior positions in Trump's second administration, including Pam Bondi, Attorney General and Susie Wiles, White House chief of staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trent Morse, another Ballard alum, is the deputy director of personnel for Trump. The Florida origins of the firm also result in Ballard having ties to the Floridians who hold sway in Trump's Washington, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Trump fundraiser\u2019s lobbying firm triples earnings mid washington power shift","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trump-fundraisers-lobbying-firm-triples-earnings-mid-washington-power-shift","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7583","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7576,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_content":"\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Ballard's ascent this year marks a cycle that occurs each time there is a change of power in Washington, as corporate America searches for an angle with an incoming president or congressional chief.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But that rhythm went into overdrive leading up to Trump's second term. Ballard, along with a few other companies with strong connections to the administration, such as Miller Strategies, Mercury Public Affairs, Michael Best Strategies and Continental Strategies, have experienced a wave of new clients since November. Those players did not return requests for their first quarter figures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Ballard has revealed over 130 new lobbying clients since Election Day alone, including JPMorgan Chase, Chevron, Palantir, Netflix, Ripple Labs and the Business Roundtable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company also signed up to lobby on behalf of a number of individuals and organizations targeted for punishment by the Trump administration, including the Harvard University governing board, the Public Broadcasting Service and law organization Kirkland & Ellis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some of Ballard's ex-lobbyists now carry senior positions in Trump's second administration, including Pam Bondi, Attorney General and Susie Wiles, White House chief of staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trent Morse, another Ballard alum, is the deputy director of personnel for Trump. The Florida origins of the firm also result in Ballard having ties to the Floridians who hold sway in Trump's Washington, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Trump fundraiser\u2019s lobbying firm triples earnings mid washington power shift","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trump-fundraisers-lobbying-firm-triples-earnings-mid-washington-power-shift","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7583","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7576,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_content":"\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

While the company has a<\/a> number of Democratic lobbyists on its list, the firm's business suffered under the Biden administration. Nevertheless, it was still in the top 20 of K Street firms, POLITICO's analysis found.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ballard's ascent this year marks a cycle that occurs each time there is a change of power in Washington, as corporate America searches for an angle with an incoming president or congressional chief.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But that rhythm went into overdrive leading up to Trump's second term. Ballard, along with a few other companies with strong connections to the administration, such as Miller Strategies, Mercury Public Affairs, Michael Best Strategies and Continental Strategies, have experienced a wave of new clients since November. Those players did not return requests for their first quarter figures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Ballard has revealed over 130 new lobbying clients since Election Day alone, including JPMorgan Chase, Chevron, Palantir, Netflix, Ripple Labs and the Business Roundtable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company also signed up to lobby on behalf of a number of individuals and organizations targeted for punishment by the Trump administration, including the Harvard University governing board, the Public Broadcasting Service and law organization Kirkland & Ellis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some of Ballard's ex-lobbyists now carry senior positions in Trump's second administration, including Pam Bondi, Attorney General and Susie Wiles, White House chief of staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trent Morse, another Ballard alum, is the deputy director of personnel for Trump. The Florida origins of the firm also result in Ballard having ties to the Floridians who hold sway in Trump's Washington, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Trump fundraiser\u2019s lobbying firm triples earnings mid washington power shift","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trump-fundraisers-lobbying-firm-triples-earnings-mid-washington-power-shift","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7583","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7576,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_content":"\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Florida lobbyist, Brian Ballard, also a longtime, opened a office in Washington for his firm soon after Trump's first White House win in 2017 and quickly became one of the go-to company for corporations and trade groups looking to comprehend the mercurial political newcomer in the White House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While the company has a<\/a> number of Democratic lobbyists on its list, the firm's business suffered under the Biden administration. Nevertheless, it was still in the top 20 of K Street firms, POLITICO's analysis found.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ballard's ascent this year marks a cycle that occurs each time there is a change of power in Washington, as corporate America searches for an angle with an incoming president or congressional chief.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But that rhythm went into overdrive leading up to Trump's second term. Ballard, along with a few other companies with strong connections to the administration, such as Miller Strategies, Mercury Public Affairs, Michael Best Strategies and Continental Strategies, have experienced a wave of new clients since November. Those players did not return requests for their first quarter figures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Ballard has revealed over 130 new lobbying clients since Election Day alone, including JPMorgan Chase, Chevron, Palantir, Netflix, Ripple Labs and the Business Roundtable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company also signed up to lobby on behalf of a number of individuals and organizations targeted for punishment by the Trump administration, including the Harvard University governing board, the Public Broadcasting Service and law organization Kirkland & Ellis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some of Ballard's ex-lobbyists now carry senior positions in Trump's second administration, including Pam Bondi, Attorney General and Susie Wiles, White House chief of staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trent Morse, another Ballard alum, is the deputy director of personnel for Trump. The Florida origins of the firm also result in Ballard having ties to the Floridians who hold sway in Trump's Washington, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Trump fundraiser\u2019s lobbying firm triples earnings mid washington power shift","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trump-fundraisers-lobbying-firm-triples-earnings-mid-washington-power-shift","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7583","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7576,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_content":"\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

According to analysis, the company topped the income chart at year-end with $16.9 million in the fourth quarter, followed by runner-up Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, which raked in $14.6 million during the quarter. In the first quarter of 2025, Brownstein's revenue decreased to $16.8 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Florida lobbyist, Brian Ballard, also a longtime, opened a office in Washington for his firm soon after Trump's first White House win in 2017 and quickly became one of the go-to company for corporations and trade groups looking to comprehend the mercurial political newcomer in the White House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While the company has a<\/a> number of Democratic lobbyists on its list, the firm's business suffered under the Biden administration. Nevertheless, it was still in the top 20 of K Street firms, POLITICO's analysis found.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ballard's ascent this year marks a cycle that occurs each time there is a change of power in Washington, as corporate America searches for an angle with an incoming president or congressional chief.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But that rhythm went into overdrive leading up to Trump's second term. Ballard, along with a few other companies with strong connections to the administration, such as Miller Strategies, Mercury Public Affairs, Michael Best Strategies and Continental Strategies, have experienced a wave of new clients since November. Those players did not return requests for their first quarter figures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Ballard has revealed over 130 new lobbying clients since Election Day alone, including JPMorgan Chase, Chevron, Palantir, Netflix, Ripple Labs and the Business Roundtable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company also signed up to lobby on behalf of a number of individuals and organizations targeted for punishment by the Trump administration, including the Harvard University governing board, the Public Broadcasting Service and law organization Kirkland & Ellis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some of Ballard's ex-lobbyists now carry senior positions in Trump's second administration, including Pam Bondi, Attorney General and Susie Wiles, White House chief of staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trent Morse, another Ballard alum, is the deputy director of personnel for Trump. The Florida origins of the firm also result in Ballard having ties to the Floridians who hold sway in Trump's Washington, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Trump fundraiser\u2019s lobbying firm triples earnings mid washington power shift","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trump-fundraisers-lobbying-firm-triples-earnings-mid-washington-power-shift","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7583","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7576,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_content":"\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Several of K Street's largest firms are yet to post first quarter revenues as of Monday night's midnight reporting deadline, but Ballard's totals will be right up at the top when the numbers finally appear. Starting a new administration normally is big money for the lobby industry \u2014 and K Street business was red hot before Trump returned to the presidency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to analysis, the company topped the income chart at year-end with $16.9 million in the fourth quarter, followed by runner-up Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, which raked in $14.6 million during the quarter. In the first quarter of 2025, Brownstein's revenue decreased to $16.8 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Florida lobbyist, Brian Ballard, also a longtime, opened a office in Washington for his firm soon after Trump's first White House win in 2017 and quickly became one of the go-to company for corporations and trade groups looking to comprehend the mercurial political newcomer in the White House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While the company has a<\/a> number of Democratic lobbyists on its list, the firm's business suffered under the Biden administration. Nevertheless, it was still in the top 20 of K Street firms, POLITICO's analysis found.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ballard's ascent this year marks a cycle that occurs each time there is a change of power in Washington, as corporate America searches for an angle with an incoming president or congressional chief.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But that rhythm went into overdrive leading up to Trump's second term. Ballard, along with a few other companies with strong connections to the administration, such as Miller Strategies, Mercury Public Affairs, Michael Best Strategies and Continental Strategies, have experienced a wave of new clients since November. Those players did not return requests for their first quarter figures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Ballard has revealed over 130 new lobbying clients since Election Day alone, including JPMorgan Chase, Chevron, Palantir, Netflix, Ripple Labs and the Business Roundtable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company also signed up to lobby on behalf of a number of individuals and organizations targeted for punishment by the Trump administration, including the Harvard University governing board, the Public Broadcasting Service and law organization Kirkland & Ellis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some of Ballard's ex-lobbyists now carry senior positions in Trump's second administration, including Pam Bondi, Attorney General and Susie Wiles, White House chief of staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trent Morse, another Ballard alum, is the deputy director of personnel for Trump. The Florida origins of the firm also result in Ballard having ties to the Floridians who hold sway in Trump's Washington, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Trump fundraiser\u2019s lobbying firm triples earnings mid washington power shift","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trump-fundraisers-lobbying-firm-triples-earnings-mid-washington-power-shift","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7583","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7576,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_content":"\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

The company will bring in $14 million of lobbying income for the first quarter of 2025, over two times the $6.2 million Ballard saw in the fourth quarter of 2024. Ballard recorded $4.2 million of lobbying income during the first quarter of 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Several of K Street's largest firms are yet to post first quarter revenues as of Monday night's midnight reporting deadline, but Ballard's totals will be right up at the top when the numbers finally appear. Starting a new administration normally is big money for the lobby industry \u2014 and K Street business was red hot before Trump returned to the presidency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to analysis, the company topped the income chart at year-end with $16.9 million in the fourth quarter, followed by runner-up Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, which raked in $14.6 million during the quarter. In the first quarter of 2025, Brownstein's revenue decreased to $16.8 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Florida lobbyist, Brian Ballard, also a longtime, opened a office in Washington for his firm soon after Trump's first White House win in 2017 and quickly became one of the go-to company for corporations and trade groups looking to comprehend the mercurial political newcomer in the White House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While the company has a<\/a> number of Democratic lobbyists on its list, the firm's business suffered under the Biden administration. Nevertheless, it was still in the top 20 of K Street firms, POLITICO's analysis found.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ballard's ascent this year marks a cycle that occurs each time there is a change of power in Washington, as corporate America searches for an angle with an incoming president or congressional chief.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But that rhythm went into overdrive leading up to Trump's second term. Ballard, along with a few other companies with strong connections to the administration, such as Miller Strategies, Mercury Public Affairs, Michael Best Strategies and Continental Strategies, have experienced a wave of new clients since November. Those players did not return requests for their first quarter figures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Ballard has revealed over 130 new lobbying clients since Election Day alone, including JPMorgan Chase, Chevron, Palantir, Netflix, Ripple Labs and the Business Roundtable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company also signed up to lobby on behalf of a number of individuals and organizations targeted for punishment by the Trump administration, including the Harvard University governing board, the Public Broadcasting Service and law organization Kirkland & Ellis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some of Ballard's ex-lobbyists now carry senior positions in Trump's second administration, including Pam Bondi, Attorney General and Susie Wiles, White House chief of staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trent Morse, another Ballard alum, is the deputy director of personnel for Trump. The Florida origins of the firm also result in Ballard having ties to the Floridians who hold sway in Trump's Washington, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Trump fundraiser\u2019s lobbying firm triples earnings mid washington power shift","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trump-fundraisers-lobbying-firm-triples-earnings-mid-washington-power-shift","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7583","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7576,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_content":"\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Ballard Partners, a lobbying company headed by a leading fundraiser for President Donald Trump<\/a>, has more than tripled its quarterly lobbying gains compared with the exact period a year earlier, as businesses and organizations have sought assistance from a small group of firms allied to the new administration in trying to make sense of a second Trump administration characterized by turmoil and retribution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company will bring in $14 million of lobbying income for the first quarter of 2025, over two times the $6.2 million Ballard saw in the fourth quarter of 2024. Ballard recorded $4.2 million of lobbying income during the first quarter of 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Several of K Street's largest firms are yet to post first quarter revenues as of Monday night's midnight reporting deadline, but Ballard's totals will be right up at the top when the numbers finally appear. Starting a new administration normally is big money for the lobby industry \u2014 and K Street business was red hot before Trump returned to the presidency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to analysis, the company topped the income chart at year-end with $16.9 million in the fourth quarter, followed by runner-up Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, which raked in $14.6 million during the quarter. In the first quarter of 2025, Brownstein's revenue decreased to $16.8 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Florida lobbyist, Brian Ballard, also a longtime, opened a office in Washington for his firm soon after Trump's first White House win in 2017 and quickly became one of the go-to company for corporations and trade groups looking to comprehend the mercurial political newcomer in the White House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While the company has a<\/a> number of Democratic lobbyists on its list, the firm's business suffered under the Biden administration. Nevertheless, it was still in the top 20 of K Street firms, POLITICO's analysis found.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ballard's ascent this year marks a cycle that occurs each time there is a change of power in Washington, as corporate America searches for an angle with an incoming president or congressional chief.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But that rhythm went into overdrive leading up to Trump's second term. Ballard, along with a few other companies with strong connections to the administration, such as Miller Strategies, Mercury Public Affairs, Michael Best Strategies and Continental Strategies, have experienced a wave of new clients since November. Those players did not return requests for their first quarter figures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Ballard has revealed over 130 new lobbying clients since Election Day alone, including JPMorgan Chase, Chevron, Palantir, Netflix, Ripple Labs and the Business Roundtable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company also signed up to lobby on behalf of a number of individuals and organizations targeted for punishment by the Trump administration, including the Harvard University governing board, the Public Broadcasting Service and law organization Kirkland & Ellis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some of Ballard's ex-lobbyists now carry senior positions in Trump's second administration, including Pam Bondi, Attorney General and Susie Wiles, White House chief of staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trent Morse, another Ballard alum, is the deputy director of personnel for Trump. The Florida origins of the firm also result in Ballard having ties to the Floridians who hold sway in Trump's Washington, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Trump fundraiser\u2019s lobbying firm triples earnings mid washington power shift","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trump-fundraisers-lobbying-firm-triples-earnings-mid-washington-power-shift","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7583","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7576,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_content":"\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

The NCAA generally allocates between $120,000<\/a> and $140,000 for its internal lobbying activities, a figure that remained the same with McColaugh's inclusion during the third and fourth quarters of 2024.<\/p>\n","post_title":"NCAA boosts Washington lobbying to secure legal shield","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"ncaa-boosts-washington-lobbying-to-secure-legal-shield","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7591","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7583,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content":"\n

Ballard Partners, a lobbying company headed by a leading fundraiser for President Donald Trump<\/a>, has more than tripled its quarterly lobbying gains compared with the exact period a year earlier, as businesses and organizations have sought assistance from a small group of firms allied to the new administration in trying to make sense of a second Trump administration characterized by turmoil and retribution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company will bring in $14 million of lobbying income for the first quarter of 2025, over two times the $6.2 million Ballard saw in the fourth quarter of 2024. Ballard recorded $4.2 million of lobbying income during the first quarter of 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Several of K Street's largest firms are yet to post first quarter revenues as of Monday night's midnight reporting deadline, but Ballard's totals will be right up at the top when the numbers finally appear. Starting a new administration normally is big money for the lobby industry \u2014 and K Street business was red hot before Trump returned to the presidency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to analysis, the company topped the income chart at year-end with $16.9 million in the fourth quarter, followed by runner-up Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, which raked in $14.6 million during the quarter. In the first quarter of 2025, Brownstein's revenue decreased to $16.8 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Florida lobbyist, Brian Ballard, also a longtime, opened a office in Washington for his firm soon after Trump's first White House win in 2017 and quickly became one of the go-to company for corporations and trade groups looking to comprehend the mercurial political newcomer in the White House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While the company has a<\/a> number of Democratic lobbyists on its list, the firm's business suffered under the Biden administration. Nevertheless, it was still in the top 20 of K Street firms, POLITICO's analysis found.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ballard's ascent this year marks a cycle that occurs each time there is a change of power in Washington, as corporate America searches for an angle with an incoming president or congressional chief.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But that rhythm went into overdrive leading up to Trump's second term. Ballard, along with a few other companies with strong connections to the administration, such as Miller Strategies, Mercury Public Affairs, Michael Best Strategies and Continental Strategies, have experienced a wave of new clients since November. Those players did not return requests for their first quarter figures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Ballard has revealed over 130 new lobbying clients since Election Day alone, including JPMorgan Chase, Chevron, Palantir, Netflix, Ripple Labs and the Business Roundtable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company also signed up to lobby on behalf of a number of individuals and organizations targeted for punishment by the Trump administration, including the Harvard University governing board, the Public Broadcasting Service and law organization Kirkland & Ellis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some of Ballard's ex-lobbyists now carry senior positions in Trump's second administration, including Pam Bondi, Attorney General and Susie Wiles, White House chief of staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trent Morse, another Ballard alum, is the deputy director of personnel for Trump. The Florida origins of the firm also result in Ballard having ties to the Floridians who hold sway in Trump's Washington, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Trump fundraiser\u2019s lobbying firm triples earnings mid washington power shift","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trump-fundraisers-lobbying-firm-triples-earnings-mid-washington-power-shift","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7583","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7576,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_content":"\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

A budget of $270,000 was also allocated to the NCAA's lobbyists. Since 2018, Dawn Buth has been engaged full-time handling government ties. Buth worked independently for several years before the organization hired a second in-house lobbyist last July: Kevin McColaugh, who previously worked for NCAA president Charlie Baker when he served as governor of Massachusetts. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA generally allocates between $120,000<\/a> and $140,000 for its internal lobbying activities, a figure that remained the same with McColaugh's inclusion during the third and fourth quarters of 2024.<\/p>\n","post_title":"NCAA boosts Washington lobbying to secure legal shield","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"ncaa-boosts-washington-lobbying-to-secure-legal-shield","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7591","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7583,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content":"\n

Ballard Partners, a lobbying company headed by a leading fundraiser for President Donald Trump<\/a>, has more than tripled its quarterly lobbying gains compared with the exact period a year earlier, as businesses and organizations have sought assistance from a small group of firms allied to the new administration in trying to make sense of a second Trump administration characterized by turmoil and retribution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company will bring in $14 million of lobbying income for the first quarter of 2025, over two times the $6.2 million Ballard saw in the fourth quarter of 2024. Ballard recorded $4.2 million of lobbying income during the first quarter of 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Several of K Street's largest firms are yet to post first quarter revenues as of Monday night's midnight reporting deadline, but Ballard's totals will be right up at the top when the numbers finally appear. Starting a new administration normally is big money for the lobby industry \u2014 and K Street business was red hot before Trump returned to the presidency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to analysis, the company topped the income chart at year-end with $16.9 million in the fourth quarter, followed by runner-up Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, which raked in $14.6 million during the quarter. In the first quarter of 2025, Brownstein's revenue decreased to $16.8 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Florida lobbyist, Brian Ballard, also a longtime, opened a office in Washington for his firm soon after Trump's first White House win in 2017 and quickly became one of the go-to company for corporations and trade groups looking to comprehend the mercurial political newcomer in the White House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While the company has a<\/a> number of Democratic lobbyists on its list, the firm's business suffered under the Biden administration. Nevertheless, it was still in the top 20 of K Street firms, POLITICO's analysis found.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ballard's ascent this year marks a cycle that occurs each time there is a change of power in Washington, as corporate America searches for an angle with an incoming president or congressional chief.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But that rhythm went into overdrive leading up to Trump's second term. Ballard, along with a few other companies with strong connections to the administration, such as Miller Strategies, Mercury Public Affairs, Michael Best Strategies and Continental Strategies, have experienced a wave of new clients since November. Those players did not return requests for their first quarter figures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Ballard has revealed over 130 new lobbying clients since Election Day alone, including JPMorgan Chase, Chevron, Palantir, Netflix, Ripple Labs and the Business Roundtable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company also signed up to lobby on behalf of a number of individuals and organizations targeted for punishment by the Trump administration, including the Harvard University governing board, the Public Broadcasting Service and law organization Kirkland & Ellis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some of Ballard's ex-lobbyists now carry senior positions in Trump's second administration, including Pam Bondi, Attorney General and Susie Wiles, White House chief of staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trent Morse, another Ballard alum, is the deputy director of personnel for Trump. The Florida origins of the firm also result in Ballard having ties to the Floridians who hold sway in Trump's Washington, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Trump fundraiser\u2019s lobbying firm triples earnings mid washington power shift","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trump-fundraisers-lobbying-firm-triples-earnings-mid-washington-power-shift","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7583","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7576,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_content":"\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

The NCAA invested $90,000 in lobbying efforts with theGroup DC, a significant player they engaged in January. theGroup DC symbolizes major customers like Pepsico and UnitedHealth Group. The firm\u2019s new client registration form lists three lobbyists: two with Democratic backgrounds and one with experience working for Republicans. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A budget of $270,000 was also allocated to the NCAA's lobbyists. Since 2018, Dawn Buth has been engaged full-time handling government ties. Buth worked independently for several years before the organization hired a second in-house lobbyist last July: Kevin McColaugh, who previously worked for NCAA president Charlie Baker when he served as governor of Massachusetts. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA generally allocates between $120,000<\/a> and $140,000 for its internal lobbying activities, a figure that remained the same with McColaugh's inclusion during the third and fourth quarters of 2024.<\/p>\n","post_title":"NCAA boosts Washington lobbying to secure legal shield","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"ncaa-boosts-washington-lobbying-to-secure-legal-shield","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7591","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7583,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content":"\n

Ballard Partners, a lobbying company headed by a leading fundraiser for President Donald Trump<\/a>, has more than tripled its quarterly lobbying gains compared with the exact period a year earlier, as businesses and organizations have sought assistance from a small group of firms allied to the new administration in trying to make sense of a second Trump administration characterized by turmoil and retribution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company will bring in $14 million of lobbying income for the first quarter of 2025, over two times the $6.2 million Ballard saw in the fourth quarter of 2024. Ballard recorded $4.2 million of lobbying income during the first quarter of 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Several of K Street's largest firms are yet to post first quarter revenues as of Monday night's midnight reporting deadline, but Ballard's totals will be right up at the top when the numbers finally appear. Starting a new administration normally is big money for the lobby industry \u2014 and K Street business was red hot before Trump returned to the presidency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to analysis, the company topped the income chart at year-end with $16.9 million in the fourth quarter, followed by runner-up Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, which raked in $14.6 million during the quarter. In the first quarter of 2025, Brownstein's revenue decreased to $16.8 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Florida lobbyist, Brian Ballard, also a longtime, opened a office in Washington for his firm soon after Trump's first White House win in 2017 and quickly became one of the go-to company for corporations and trade groups looking to comprehend the mercurial political newcomer in the White House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While the company has a<\/a> number of Democratic lobbyists on its list, the firm's business suffered under the Biden administration. Nevertheless, it was still in the top 20 of K Street firms, POLITICO's analysis found.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ballard's ascent this year marks a cycle that occurs each time there is a change of power in Washington, as corporate America searches for an angle with an incoming president or congressional chief.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But that rhythm went into overdrive leading up to Trump's second term. Ballard, along with a few other companies with strong connections to the administration, such as Miller Strategies, Mercury Public Affairs, Michael Best Strategies and Continental Strategies, have experienced a wave of new clients since November. Those players did not return requests for their first quarter figures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Ballard has revealed over 130 new lobbying clients since Election Day alone, including JPMorgan Chase, Chevron, Palantir, Netflix, Ripple Labs and the Business Roundtable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company also signed up to lobby on behalf of a number of individuals and organizations targeted for punishment by the Trump administration, including the Harvard University governing board, the Public Broadcasting Service and law organization Kirkland & Ellis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some of Ballard's ex-lobbyists now carry senior positions in Trump's second administration, including Pam Bondi, Attorney General and Susie Wiles, White House chief of staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trent Morse, another Ballard alum, is the deputy director of personnel for Trump. The Florida origins of the firm also result in Ballard having ties to the Floridians who hold sway in Trump's Washington, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Trump fundraiser\u2019s lobbying firm triples earnings mid washington power shift","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trump-fundraisers-lobbying-firm-triples-earnings-mid-washington-power-shift","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7583","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7576,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_content":"\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

From January to March, the NCAA disbursed $90,000 to its established lobbying firm, Brownstein Hyatt, as noted in a quarterly lobbying report submitted on April 18. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA invested $90,000 in lobbying efforts with theGroup DC, a significant player they engaged in January. theGroup DC symbolizes major customers like Pepsico and UnitedHealth Group. The firm\u2019s new client registration form lists three lobbyists: two with Democratic backgrounds and one with experience working for Republicans. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A budget of $270,000 was also allocated to the NCAA's lobbyists. Since 2018, Dawn Buth has been engaged full-time handling government ties. Buth worked independently for several years before the organization hired a second in-house lobbyist last July: Kevin McColaugh, who previously worked for NCAA president Charlie Baker when he served as governor of Massachusetts. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA generally allocates between $120,000<\/a> and $140,000 for its internal lobbying activities, a figure that remained the same with McColaugh's inclusion during the third and fourth quarters of 2024.<\/p>\n","post_title":"NCAA boosts Washington lobbying to secure legal shield","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"ncaa-boosts-washington-lobbying-to-secure-legal-shield","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7591","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7583,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content":"\n

Ballard Partners, a lobbying company headed by a leading fundraiser for President Donald Trump<\/a>, has more than tripled its quarterly lobbying gains compared with the exact period a year earlier, as businesses and organizations have sought assistance from a small group of firms allied to the new administration in trying to make sense of a second Trump administration characterized by turmoil and retribution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company will bring in $14 million of lobbying income for the first quarter of 2025, over two times the $6.2 million Ballard saw in the fourth quarter of 2024. Ballard recorded $4.2 million of lobbying income during the first quarter of 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Several of K Street's largest firms are yet to post first quarter revenues as of Monday night's midnight reporting deadline, but Ballard's totals will be right up at the top when the numbers finally appear. Starting a new administration normally is big money for the lobby industry \u2014 and K Street business was red hot before Trump returned to the presidency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to analysis, the company topped the income chart at year-end with $16.9 million in the fourth quarter, followed by runner-up Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, which raked in $14.6 million during the quarter. In the first quarter of 2025, Brownstein's revenue decreased to $16.8 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Florida lobbyist, Brian Ballard, also a longtime, opened a office in Washington for his firm soon after Trump's first White House win in 2017 and quickly became one of the go-to company for corporations and trade groups looking to comprehend the mercurial political newcomer in the White House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While the company has a<\/a> number of Democratic lobbyists on its list, the firm's business suffered under the Biden administration. Nevertheless, it was still in the top 20 of K Street firms, POLITICO's analysis found.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ballard's ascent this year marks a cycle that occurs each time there is a change of power in Washington, as corporate America searches for an angle with an incoming president or congressional chief.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But that rhythm went into overdrive leading up to Trump's second term. Ballard, along with a few other companies with strong connections to the administration, such as Miller Strategies, Mercury Public Affairs, Michael Best Strategies and Continental Strategies, have experienced a wave of new clients since November. Those players did not return requests for their first quarter figures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Ballard has revealed over 130 new lobbying clients since Election Day alone, including JPMorgan Chase, Chevron, Palantir, Netflix, Ripple Labs and the Business Roundtable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company also signed up to lobby on behalf of a number of individuals and organizations targeted for punishment by the Trump administration, including the Harvard University governing board, the Public Broadcasting Service and law organization Kirkland & Ellis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some of Ballard's ex-lobbyists now carry senior positions in Trump's second administration, including Pam Bondi, Attorney General and Susie Wiles, White House chief of staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trent Morse, another Ballard alum, is the deputy director of personnel for Trump. The Florida origins of the firm also result in Ballard having ties to the Floridians who hold sway in Trump's Washington, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Trump fundraiser\u2019s lobbying firm triples earnings mid washington power shift","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trump-fundraisers-lobbying-firm-triples-earnings-mid-washington-power-shift","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7583","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7576,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_content":"\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Industry experts indicated that Republicans may have been more open to the NCAA\u2019s requests, which could explain their increased lobbying efforts to pass legislation. Nevertheless, sources have informed FOS that certain House and Senate Republicans oppose at least the NCAA\u2019s requested antitrust exemptions for several reasons, notably a lack of trust in the NCAA. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

From January to March, the NCAA disbursed $90,000 to its established lobbying firm, Brownstein Hyatt, as noted in a quarterly lobbying report submitted on April 18. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA invested $90,000 in lobbying efforts with theGroup DC, a significant player they engaged in January. theGroup DC symbolizes major customers like Pepsico and UnitedHealth Group. The firm\u2019s new client registration form lists three lobbyists: two with Democratic backgrounds and one with experience working for Republicans. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A budget of $270,000 was also allocated to the NCAA's lobbyists. Since 2018, Dawn Buth has been engaged full-time handling government ties. Buth worked independently for several years before the organization hired a second in-house lobbyist last July: Kevin McColaugh, who previously worked for NCAA president Charlie Baker when he served as governor of Massachusetts. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA generally allocates between $120,000<\/a> and $140,000 for its internal lobbying activities, a figure that remained the same with McColaugh's inclusion during the third and fourth quarters of 2024.<\/p>\n","post_title":"NCAA boosts Washington lobbying to secure legal shield","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"ncaa-boosts-washington-lobbying-to-secure-legal-shield","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7591","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7583,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content":"\n

Ballard Partners, a lobbying company headed by a leading fundraiser for President Donald Trump<\/a>, has more than tripled its quarterly lobbying gains compared with the exact period a year earlier, as businesses and organizations have sought assistance from a small group of firms allied to the new administration in trying to make sense of a second Trump administration characterized by turmoil and retribution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company will bring in $14 million of lobbying income for the first quarter of 2025, over two times the $6.2 million Ballard saw in the fourth quarter of 2024. Ballard recorded $4.2 million of lobbying income during the first quarter of 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Several of K Street's largest firms are yet to post first quarter revenues as of Monday night's midnight reporting deadline, but Ballard's totals will be right up at the top when the numbers finally appear. Starting a new administration normally is big money for the lobby industry \u2014 and K Street business was red hot before Trump returned to the presidency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to analysis, the company topped the income chart at year-end with $16.9 million in the fourth quarter, followed by runner-up Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, which raked in $14.6 million during the quarter. In the first quarter of 2025, Brownstein's revenue decreased to $16.8 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Florida lobbyist, Brian Ballard, also a longtime, opened a office in Washington for his firm soon after Trump's first White House win in 2017 and quickly became one of the go-to company for corporations and trade groups looking to comprehend the mercurial political newcomer in the White House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While the company has a<\/a> number of Democratic lobbyists on its list, the firm's business suffered under the Biden administration. Nevertheless, it was still in the top 20 of K Street firms, POLITICO's analysis found.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ballard's ascent this year marks a cycle that occurs each time there is a change of power in Washington, as corporate America searches for an angle with an incoming president or congressional chief.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But that rhythm went into overdrive leading up to Trump's second term. Ballard, along with a few other companies with strong connections to the administration, such as Miller Strategies, Mercury Public Affairs, Michael Best Strategies and Continental Strategies, have experienced a wave of new clients since November. Those players did not return requests for their first quarter figures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Ballard has revealed over 130 new lobbying clients since Election Day alone, including JPMorgan Chase, Chevron, Palantir, Netflix, Ripple Labs and the Business Roundtable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company also signed up to lobby on behalf of a number of individuals and organizations targeted for punishment by the Trump administration, including the Harvard University governing board, the Public Broadcasting Service and law organization Kirkland & Ellis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some of Ballard's ex-lobbyists now carry senior positions in Trump's second administration, including Pam Bondi, Attorney General and Susie Wiles, White House chief of staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trent Morse, another Ballard alum, is the deputy director of personnel for Trump. The Florida origins of the firm also result in Ballard having ties to the Floridians who hold sway in Trump's Washington, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Trump fundraiser\u2019s lobbying firm triples earnings mid washington power shift","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trump-fundraisers-lobbying-firm-triples-earnings-mid-washington-power-shift","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7583","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7576,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_content":"\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

The NCAA works as a nonprofit, maintaining a permanent headquarters in Indianapolis with multiple workers responsible for executing titles, supporting laws, and certainly, lobbying. However, the NCAA sees itself as a \u201cmember-driven\u201d organization\u2014merely implementing the wishes of the schools it represents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Industry experts indicated that Republicans may have been more open to the NCAA\u2019s requests, which could explain their increased lobbying efforts to pass legislation. Nevertheless, sources have informed FOS that certain House and Senate Republicans oppose at least the NCAA\u2019s requested antitrust exemptions for several reasons, notably a lack of trust in the NCAA. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

From January to March, the NCAA disbursed $90,000 to its established lobbying firm, Brownstein Hyatt, as noted in a quarterly lobbying report submitted on April 18. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA invested $90,000 in lobbying efforts with theGroup DC, a significant player they engaged in January. theGroup DC symbolizes major customers like Pepsico and UnitedHealth Group. The firm\u2019s new client registration form lists three lobbyists: two with Democratic backgrounds and one with experience working for Republicans. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A budget of $270,000 was also allocated to the NCAA's lobbyists. Since 2018, Dawn Buth has been engaged full-time handling government ties. Buth worked independently for several years before the organization hired a second in-house lobbyist last July: Kevin McColaugh, who previously worked for NCAA president Charlie Baker when he served as governor of Massachusetts. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA generally allocates between $120,000<\/a> and $140,000 for its internal lobbying activities, a figure that remained the same with McColaugh's inclusion during the third and fourth quarters of 2024.<\/p>\n","post_title":"NCAA boosts Washington lobbying to secure legal shield","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"ncaa-boosts-washington-lobbying-to-secure-legal-shield","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7591","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7583,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content":"\n

Ballard Partners, a lobbying company headed by a leading fundraiser for President Donald Trump<\/a>, has more than tripled its quarterly lobbying gains compared with the exact period a year earlier, as businesses and organizations have sought assistance from a small group of firms allied to the new administration in trying to make sense of a second Trump administration characterized by turmoil and retribution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company will bring in $14 million of lobbying income for the first quarter of 2025, over two times the $6.2 million Ballard saw in the fourth quarter of 2024. Ballard recorded $4.2 million of lobbying income during the first quarter of 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Several of K Street's largest firms are yet to post first quarter revenues as of Monday night's midnight reporting deadline, but Ballard's totals will be right up at the top when the numbers finally appear. Starting a new administration normally is big money for the lobby industry \u2014 and K Street business was red hot before Trump returned to the presidency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to analysis, the company topped the income chart at year-end with $16.9 million in the fourth quarter, followed by runner-up Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, which raked in $14.6 million during the quarter. In the first quarter of 2025, Brownstein's revenue decreased to $16.8 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Florida lobbyist, Brian Ballard, also a longtime, opened a office in Washington for his firm soon after Trump's first White House win in 2017 and quickly became one of the go-to company for corporations and trade groups looking to comprehend the mercurial political newcomer in the White House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While the company has a<\/a> number of Democratic lobbyists on its list, the firm's business suffered under the Biden administration. Nevertheless, it was still in the top 20 of K Street firms, POLITICO's analysis found.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ballard's ascent this year marks a cycle that occurs each time there is a change of power in Washington, as corporate America searches for an angle with an incoming president or congressional chief.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But that rhythm went into overdrive leading up to Trump's second term. Ballard, along with a few other companies with strong connections to the administration, such as Miller Strategies, Mercury Public Affairs, Michael Best Strategies and Continental Strategies, have experienced a wave of new clients since November. Those players did not return requests for their first quarter figures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Ballard has revealed over 130 new lobbying clients since Election Day alone, including JPMorgan Chase, Chevron, Palantir, Netflix, Ripple Labs and the Business Roundtable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company also signed up to lobby on behalf of a number of individuals and organizations targeted for punishment by the Trump administration, including the Harvard University governing board, the Public Broadcasting Service and law organization Kirkland & Ellis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some of Ballard's ex-lobbyists now carry senior positions in Trump's second administration, including Pam Bondi, Attorney General and Susie Wiles, White House chief of staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trent Morse, another Ballard alum, is the deputy director of personnel for Trump. The Florida origins of the firm also result in Ballard having ties to the Floridians who hold sway in Trump's Washington, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Trump fundraiser\u2019s lobbying firm triples earnings mid washington power shift","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trump-fundraisers-lobbying-firm-triples-earnings-mid-washington-power-shift","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7583","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7576,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_content":"\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

\"NCAA is instituting positive reforms for student-athletes and responding to different issues in college athletics by mandating health and wellness benefits and guaranteeing scholarships,\" the NCAA SVP for External Affairs added in a statement to Front Office Sports. \"But some of the threats facing college sports can only be addressed by Congress, and the Association is working with student-athletes and their institutions to push for bipartisan legislation.\" Buckley pointed out the NCAA\u2019s challenges in classifying athletes as amateurs and regulating the transfer portal, among other issues, that necessitate congressional support.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA works as a nonprofit, maintaining a permanent headquarters in Indianapolis with multiple workers responsible for executing titles, supporting laws, and certainly, lobbying. However, the NCAA sees itself as a \u201cmember-driven\u201d organization\u2014merely implementing the wishes of the schools it represents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Industry experts indicated that Republicans may have been more open to the NCAA\u2019s requests, which could explain their increased lobbying efforts to pass legislation. Nevertheless, sources have informed FOS that certain House and Senate Republicans oppose at least the NCAA\u2019s requested antitrust exemptions for several reasons, notably a lack of trust in the NCAA. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

From January to March, the NCAA disbursed $90,000 to its established lobbying firm, Brownstein Hyatt, as noted in a quarterly lobbying report submitted on April 18. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA invested $90,000 in lobbying efforts with theGroup DC, a significant player they engaged in January. theGroup DC symbolizes major customers like Pepsico and UnitedHealth Group. The firm\u2019s new client registration form lists three lobbyists: two with Democratic backgrounds and one with experience working for Republicans. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A budget of $270,000 was also allocated to the NCAA's lobbyists. Since 2018, Dawn Buth has been engaged full-time handling government ties. Buth worked independently for several years before the organization hired a second in-house lobbyist last July: Kevin McColaugh, who previously worked for NCAA president Charlie Baker when he served as governor of Massachusetts. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA generally allocates between $120,000<\/a> and $140,000 for its internal lobbying activities, a figure that remained the same with McColaugh's inclusion during the third and fourth quarters of 2024.<\/p>\n","post_title":"NCAA boosts Washington lobbying to secure legal shield","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"ncaa-boosts-washington-lobbying-to-secure-legal-shield","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7591","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7583,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content":"\n

Ballard Partners, a lobbying company headed by a leading fundraiser for President Donald Trump<\/a>, has more than tripled its quarterly lobbying gains compared with the exact period a year earlier, as businesses and organizations have sought assistance from a small group of firms allied to the new administration in trying to make sense of a second Trump administration characterized by turmoil and retribution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company will bring in $14 million of lobbying income for the first quarter of 2025, over two times the $6.2 million Ballard saw in the fourth quarter of 2024. Ballard recorded $4.2 million of lobbying income during the first quarter of 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Several of K Street's largest firms are yet to post first quarter revenues as of Monday night's midnight reporting deadline, but Ballard's totals will be right up at the top when the numbers finally appear. Starting a new administration normally is big money for the lobby industry \u2014 and K Street business was red hot before Trump returned to the presidency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to analysis, the company topped the income chart at year-end with $16.9 million in the fourth quarter, followed by runner-up Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, which raked in $14.6 million during the quarter. In the first quarter of 2025, Brownstein's revenue decreased to $16.8 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Florida lobbyist, Brian Ballard, also a longtime, opened a office in Washington for his firm soon after Trump's first White House win in 2017 and quickly became one of the go-to company for corporations and trade groups looking to comprehend the mercurial political newcomer in the White House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While the company has a<\/a> number of Democratic lobbyists on its list, the firm's business suffered under the Biden administration. Nevertheless, it was still in the top 20 of K Street firms, POLITICO's analysis found.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ballard's ascent this year marks a cycle that occurs each time there is a change of power in Washington, as corporate America searches for an angle with an incoming president or congressional chief.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But that rhythm went into overdrive leading up to Trump's second term. Ballard, along with a few other companies with strong connections to the administration, such as Miller Strategies, Mercury Public Affairs, Michael Best Strategies and Continental Strategies, have experienced a wave of new clients since November. Those players did not return requests for their first quarter figures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Ballard has revealed over 130 new lobbying clients since Election Day alone, including JPMorgan Chase, Chevron, Palantir, Netflix, Ripple Labs and the Business Roundtable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company also signed up to lobby on behalf of a number of individuals and organizations targeted for punishment by the Trump administration, including the Harvard University governing board, the Public Broadcasting Service and law organization Kirkland & Ellis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some of Ballard's ex-lobbyists now carry senior positions in Trump's second administration, including Pam Bondi, Attorney General and Susie Wiles, White House chief of staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trent Morse, another Ballard alum, is the deputy director of personnel for Trump. The Florida origins of the firm also result in Ballard having ties to the Floridians who hold sway in Trump's Washington, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Trump fundraiser\u2019s lobbying firm triples earnings mid washington power shift","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trump-fundraisers-lobbying-firm-triples-earnings-mid-washington-power-shift","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7583","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7576,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_content":"\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Last May, the NCAA and conferences defined the compensation plan as a \u201croad map\u201d for Congress. A federal judge is anticipated to issue a ruling on final approval within the next few weeks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"NCAA is instituting positive reforms for student-athletes and responding to different issues in college athletics by mandating health and wellness benefits and guaranteeing scholarships,\" the NCAA SVP for External Affairs added in a statement to Front Office Sports. \"But some of the threats facing college sports can only be addressed by Congress, and the Association is working with student-athletes and their institutions to push for bipartisan legislation.\" Buckley pointed out the NCAA\u2019s challenges in classifying athletes as amateurs and regulating the transfer portal, among other issues, that necessitate congressional support.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA works as a nonprofit, maintaining a permanent headquarters in Indianapolis with multiple workers responsible for executing titles, supporting laws, and certainly, lobbying. However, the NCAA sees itself as a \u201cmember-driven\u201d organization\u2014merely implementing the wishes of the schools it represents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Industry experts indicated that Republicans may have been more open to the NCAA\u2019s requests, which could explain their increased lobbying efforts to pass legislation. Nevertheless, sources have informed FOS that certain House and Senate Republicans oppose at least the NCAA\u2019s requested antitrust exemptions for several reasons, notably a lack of trust in the NCAA. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

From January to March, the NCAA disbursed $90,000 to its established lobbying firm, Brownstein Hyatt, as noted in a quarterly lobbying report submitted on April 18. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA invested $90,000 in lobbying efforts with theGroup DC, a significant player they engaged in January. theGroup DC symbolizes major customers like Pepsico and UnitedHealth Group. The firm\u2019s new client registration form lists three lobbyists: two with Democratic backgrounds and one with experience working for Republicans. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A budget of $270,000 was also allocated to the NCAA's lobbyists. Since 2018, Dawn Buth has been engaged full-time handling government ties. Buth worked independently for several years before the organization hired a second in-house lobbyist last July: Kevin McColaugh, who previously worked for NCAA president Charlie Baker when he served as governor of Massachusetts. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA generally allocates between $120,000<\/a> and $140,000 for its internal lobbying activities, a figure that remained the same with McColaugh's inclusion during the third and fourth quarters of 2024.<\/p>\n","post_title":"NCAA boosts Washington lobbying to secure legal shield","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"ncaa-boosts-washington-lobbying-to-secure-legal-shield","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7591","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7583,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content":"\n

Ballard Partners, a lobbying company headed by a leading fundraiser for President Donald Trump<\/a>, has more than tripled its quarterly lobbying gains compared with the exact period a year earlier, as businesses and organizations have sought assistance from a small group of firms allied to the new administration in trying to make sense of a second Trump administration characterized by turmoil and retribution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company will bring in $14 million of lobbying income for the first quarter of 2025, over two times the $6.2 million Ballard saw in the fourth quarter of 2024. Ballard recorded $4.2 million of lobbying income during the first quarter of 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Several of K Street's largest firms are yet to post first quarter revenues as of Monday night's midnight reporting deadline, but Ballard's totals will be right up at the top when the numbers finally appear. Starting a new administration normally is big money for the lobby industry \u2014 and K Street business was red hot before Trump returned to the presidency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to analysis, the company topped the income chart at year-end with $16.9 million in the fourth quarter, followed by runner-up Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, which raked in $14.6 million during the quarter. In the first quarter of 2025, Brownstein's revenue decreased to $16.8 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Florida lobbyist, Brian Ballard, also a longtime, opened a office in Washington for his firm soon after Trump's first White House win in 2017 and quickly became one of the go-to company for corporations and trade groups looking to comprehend the mercurial political newcomer in the White House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While the company has a<\/a> number of Democratic lobbyists on its list, the firm's business suffered under the Biden administration. Nevertheless, it was still in the top 20 of K Street firms, POLITICO's analysis found.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ballard's ascent this year marks a cycle that occurs each time there is a change of power in Washington, as corporate America searches for an angle with an incoming president or congressional chief.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But that rhythm went into overdrive leading up to Trump's second term. Ballard, along with a few other companies with strong connections to the administration, such as Miller Strategies, Mercury Public Affairs, Michael Best Strategies and Continental Strategies, have experienced a wave of new clients since November. Those players did not return requests for their first quarter figures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Ballard has revealed over 130 new lobbying clients since Election Day alone, including JPMorgan Chase, Chevron, Palantir, Netflix, Ripple Labs and the Business Roundtable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company also signed up to lobby on behalf of a number of individuals and organizations targeted for punishment by the Trump administration, including the Harvard University governing board, the Public Broadcasting Service and law organization Kirkland & Ellis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some of Ballard's ex-lobbyists now carry senior positions in Trump's second administration, including Pam Bondi, Attorney General and Susie Wiles, White House chief of staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trent Morse, another Ballard alum, is the deputy director of personnel for Trump. The Florida origins of the firm also result in Ballard having ties to the Floridians who hold sway in Trump's Washington, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Trump fundraiser\u2019s lobbying firm triples earnings mid washington power shift","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trump-fundraisers-lobbying-firm-triples-earnings-mid-washington-power-shift","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7583","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7576,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_content":"\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

To achieve this, the NCAA seeks antitrust protections, the preemption of state laws regarding NIL (name, image, and likeness), and a clause that stops college athletes from being classified as employees. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last May, the NCAA and conferences defined the compensation plan as a \u201croad map\u201d for Congress. A federal judge is anticipated to issue a ruling on final approval within the next few weeks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"NCAA is instituting positive reforms for student-athletes and responding to different issues in college athletics by mandating health and wellness benefits and guaranteeing scholarships,\" the NCAA SVP for External Affairs added in a statement to Front Office Sports. \"But some of the threats facing college sports can only be addressed by Congress, and the Association is working with student-athletes and their institutions to push for bipartisan legislation.\" Buckley pointed out the NCAA\u2019s challenges in classifying athletes as amateurs and regulating the transfer portal, among other issues, that necessitate congressional support.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA works as a nonprofit, maintaining a permanent headquarters in Indianapolis with multiple workers responsible for executing titles, supporting laws, and certainly, lobbying. However, the NCAA sees itself as a \u201cmember-driven\u201d organization\u2014merely implementing the wishes of the schools it represents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Industry experts indicated that Republicans may have been more open to the NCAA\u2019s requests, which could explain their increased lobbying efforts to pass legislation. Nevertheless, sources have informed FOS that certain House and Senate Republicans oppose at least the NCAA\u2019s requested antitrust exemptions for several reasons, notably a lack of trust in the NCAA. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

From January to March, the NCAA disbursed $90,000 to its established lobbying firm, Brownstein Hyatt, as noted in a quarterly lobbying report submitted on April 18. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA invested $90,000 in lobbying efforts with theGroup DC, a significant player they engaged in January. theGroup DC symbolizes major customers like Pepsico and UnitedHealth Group. The firm\u2019s new client registration form lists three lobbyists: two with Democratic backgrounds and one with experience working for Republicans. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A budget of $270,000 was also allocated to the NCAA's lobbyists. Since 2018, Dawn Buth has been engaged full-time handling government ties. Buth worked independently for several years before the organization hired a second in-house lobbyist last July: Kevin McColaugh, who previously worked for NCAA president Charlie Baker when he served as governor of Massachusetts. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA generally allocates between $120,000<\/a> and $140,000 for its internal lobbying activities, a figure that remained the same with McColaugh's inclusion during the third and fourth quarters of 2024.<\/p>\n","post_title":"NCAA boosts Washington lobbying to secure legal shield","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"ncaa-boosts-washington-lobbying-to-secure-legal-shield","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7591","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7583,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content":"\n

Ballard Partners, a lobbying company headed by a leading fundraiser for President Donald Trump<\/a>, has more than tripled its quarterly lobbying gains compared with the exact period a year earlier, as businesses and organizations have sought assistance from a small group of firms allied to the new administration in trying to make sense of a second Trump administration characterized by turmoil and retribution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company will bring in $14 million of lobbying income for the first quarter of 2025, over two times the $6.2 million Ballard saw in the fourth quarter of 2024. Ballard recorded $4.2 million of lobbying income during the first quarter of 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Several of K Street's largest firms are yet to post first quarter revenues as of Monday night's midnight reporting deadline, but Ballard's totals will be right up at the top when the numbers finally appear. Starting a new administration normally is big money for the lobby industry \u2014 and K Street business was red hot before Trump returned to the presidency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to analysis, the company topped the income chart at year-end with $16.9 million in the fourth quarter, followed by runner-up Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, which raked in $14.6 million during the quarter. In the first quarter of 2025, Brownstein's revenue decreased to $16.8 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Florida lobbyist, Brian Ballard, also a longtime, opened a office in Washington for his firm soon after Trump's first White House win in 2017 and quickly became one of the go-to company for corporations and trade groups looking to comprehend the mercurial political newcomer in the White House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While the company has a<\/a> number of Democratic lobbyists on its list, the firm's business suffered under the Biden administration. Nevertheless, it was still in the top 20 of K Street firms, POLITICO's analysis found.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ballard's ascent this year marks a cycle that occurs each time there is a change of power in Washington, as corporate America searches for an angle with an incoming president or congressional chief.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But that rhythm went into overdrive leading up to Trump's second term. Ballard, along with a few other companies with strong connections to the administration, such as Miller Strategies, Mercury Public Affairs, Michael Best Strategies and Continental Strategies, have experienced a wave of new clients since November. Those players did not return requests for their first quarter figures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Ballard has revealed over 130 new lobbying clients since Election Day alone, including JPMorgan Chase, Chevron, Palantir, Netflix, Ripple Labs and the Business Roundtable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company also signed up to lobby on behalf of a number of individuals and organizations targeted for punishment by the Trump administration, including the Harvard University governing board, the Public Broadcasting Service and law organization Kirkland & Ellis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some of Ballard's ex-lobbyists now carry senior positions in Trump's second administration, including Pam Bondi, Attorney General and Susie Wiles, White House chief of staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trent Morse, another Ballard alum, is the deputy director of personnel for Trump. The Florida origins of the firm also result in Ballard having ties to the Floridians who hold sway in Trump's Washington, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Trump fundraiser\u2019s lobbying firm triples earnings mid washington power shift","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trump-fundraisers-lobbying-firm-triples-earnings-mid-washington-power-shift","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7583","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7576,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_content":"\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

The NCAA views the settlement as evidence that it has taken all possible steps to reform college sports, and now it\u2019s Congress\u2019 responsibility to intervene to safeguard the remaining rules and enable the legal enforcement of additional measures, such as transfer restrictions.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To achieve this, the NCAA seeks antitrust protections, the preemption of state laws regarding NIL (name, image, and likeness), and a clause that stops college athletes from being classified as employees. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last May, the NCAA and conferences defined the compensation plan as a \u201croad map\u201d for Congress. A federal judge is anticipated to issue a ruling on final approval within the next few weeks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"NCAA is instituting positive reforms for student-athletes and responding to different issues in college athletics by mandating health and wellness benefits and guaranteeing scholarships,\" the NCAA SVP for External Affairs added in a statement to Front Office Sports. \"But some of the threats facing college sports can only be addressed by Congress, and the Association is working with student-athletes and their institutions to push for bipartisan legislation.\" Buckley pointed out the NCAA\u2019s challenges in classifying athletes as amateurs and regulating the transfer portal, among other issues, that necessitate congressional support.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA works as a nonprofit, maintaining a permanent headquarters in Indianapolis with multiple workers responsible for executing titles, supporting laws, and certainly, lobbying. However, the NCAA sees itself as a \u201cmember-driven\u201d organization\u2014merely implementing the wishes of the schools it represents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Industry experts indicated that Republicans may have been more open to the NCAA\u2019s requests, which could explain their increased lobbying efforts to pass legislation. Nevertheless, sources have informed FOS that certain House and Senate Republicans oppose at least the NCAA\u2019s requested antitrust exemptions for several reasons, notably a lack of trust in the NCAA. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

From January to March, the NCAA disbursed $90,000 to its established lobbying firm, Brownstein Hyatt, as noted in a quarterly lobbying report submitted on April 18. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA invested $90,000 in lobbying efforts with theGroup DC, a significant player they engaged in January. theGroup DC symbolizes major customers like Pepsico and UnitedHealth Group. The firm\u2019s new client registration form lists three lobbyists: two with Democratic backgrounds and one with experience working for Republicans. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A budget of $270,000 was also allocated to the NCAA's lobbyists. Since 2018, Dawn Buth has been engaged full-time handling government ties. Buth worked independently for several years before the organization hired a second in-house lobbyist last July: Kevin McColaugh, who previously worked for NCAA president Charlie Baker when he served as governor of Massachusetts. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA generally allocates between $120,000<\/a> and $140,000 for its internal lobbying activities, a figure that remained the same with McColaugh's inclusion during the third and fourth quarters of 2024.<\/p>\n","post_title":"NCAA boosts Washington lobbying to secure legal shield","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"ncaa-boosts-washington-lobbying-to-secure-legal-shield","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7591","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7583,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content":"\n

Ballard Partners, a lobbying company headed by a leading fundraiser for President Donald Trump<\/a>, has more than tripled its quarterly lobbying gains compared with the exact period a year earlier, as businesses and organizations have sought assistance from a small group of firms allied to the new administration in trying to make sense of a second Trump administration characterized by turmoil and retribution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company will bring in $14 million of lobbying income for the first quarter of 2025, over two times the $6.2 million Ballard saw in the fourth quarter of 2024. Ballard recorded $4.2 million of lobbying income during the first quarter of 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Several of K Street's largest firms are yet to post first quarter revenues as of Monday night's midnight reporting deadline, but Ballard's totals will be right up at the top when the numbers finally appear. Starting a new administration normally is big money for the lobby industry \u2014 and K Street business was red hot before Trump returned to the presidency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to analysis, the company topped the income chart at year-end with $16.9 million in the fourth quarter, followed by runner-up Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, which raked in $14.6 million during the quarter. In the first quarter of 2025, Brownstein's revenue decreased to $16.8 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Florida lobbyist, Brian Ballard, also a longtime, opened a office in Washington for his firm soon after Trump's first White House win in 2017 and quickly became one of the go-to company for corporations and trade groups looking to comprehend the mercurial political newcomer in the White House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While the company has a<\/a> number of Democratic lobbyists on its list, the firm's business suffered under the Biden administration. Nevertheless, it was still in the top 20 of K Street firms, POLITICO's analysis found.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ballard's ascent this year marks a cycle that occurs each time there is a change of power in Washington, as corporate America searches for an angle with an incoming president or congressional chief.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But that rhythm went into overdrive leading up to Trump's second term. Ballard, along with a few other companies with strong connections to the administration, such as Miller Strategies, Mercury Public Affairs, Michael Best Strategies and Continental Strategies, have experienced a wave of new clients since November. Those players did not return requests for their first quarter figures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Ballard has revealed over 130 new lobbying clients since Election Day alone, including JPMorgan Chase, Chevron, Palantir, Netflix, Ripple Labs and the Business Roundtable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company also signed up to lobby on behalf of a number of individuals and organizations targeted for punishment by the Trump administration, including the Harvard University governing board, the Public Broadcasting Service and law organization Kirkland & Ellis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some of Ballard's ex-lobbyists now carry senior positions in Trump's second administration, including Pam Bondi, Attorney General and Susie Wiles, White House chief of staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trent Morse, another Ballard alum, is the deputy director of personnel for Trump. The Florida origins of the firm also result in Ballard having ties to the Floridians who hold sway in Trump's Washington, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Trump fundraiser\u2019s lobbying firm triples earnings mid washington power shift","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trump-fundraisers-lobbying-firm-triples-earnings-mid-washington-power-shift","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7583","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7576,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_content":"\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

NCAA president Charlie Baker commented to reporters during the men\u2019s Final Four. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA views the settlement as evidence that it has taken all possible steps to reform college sports, and now it\u2019s Congress\u2019 responsibility to intervene to safeguard the remaining rules and enable the legal enforcement of additional measures, such as transfer restrictions.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To achieve this, the NCAA seeks antitrust protections, the preemption of state laws regarding NIL (name, image, and likeness), and a clause that stops college athletes from being classified as employees. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last May, the NCAA and conferences defined the compensation plan as a \u201croad map\u201d for Congress. A federal judge is anticipated to issue a ruling on final approval within the next few weeks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"NCAA is instituting positive reforms for student-athletes and responding to different issues in college athletics by mandating health and wellness benefits and guaranteeing scholarships,\" the NCAA SVP for External Affairs added in a statement to Front Office Sports. \"But some of the threats facing college sports can only be addressed by Congress, and the Association is working with student-athletes and their institutions to push for bipartisan legislation.\" Buckley pointed out the NCAA\u2019s challenges in classifying athletes as amateurs and regulating the transfer portal, among other issues, that necessitate congressional support.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA works as a nonprofit, maintaining a permanent headquarters in Indianapolis with multiple workers responsible for executing titles, supporting laws, and certainly, lobbying. However, the NCAA sees itself as a \u201cmember-driven\u201d organization\u2014merely implementing the wishes of the schools it represents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Industry experts indicated that Republicans may have been more open to the NCAA\u2019s requests, which could explain their increased lobbying efforts to pass legislation. Nevertheless, sources have informed FOS that certain House and Senate Republicans oppose at least the NCAA\u2019s requested antitrust exemptions for several reasons, notably a lack of trust in the NCAA. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

From January to March, the NCAA disbursed $90,000 to its established lobbying firm, Brownstein Hyatt, as noted in a quarterly lobbying report submitted on April 18. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA invested $90,000 in lobbying efforts with theGroup DC, a significant player they engaged in January. theGroup DC symbolizes major customers like Pepsico and UnitedHealth Group. The firm\u2019s new client registration form lists three lobbyists: two with Democratic backgrounds and one with experience working for Republicans. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A budget of $270,000 was also allocated to the NCAA's lobbyists. Since 2018, Dawn Buth has been engaged full-time handling government ties. Buth worked independently for several years before the organization hired a second in-house lobbyist last July: Kevin McColaugh, who previously worked for NCAA president Charlie Baker when he served as governor of Massachusetts. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA generally allocates between $120,000<\/a> and $140,000 for its internal lobbying activities, a figure that remained the same with McColaugh's inclusion during the third and fourth quarters of 2024.<\/p>\n","post_title":"NCAA boosts Washington lobbying to secure legal shield","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"ncaa-boosts-washington-lobbying-to-secure-legal-shield","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7591","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7583,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content":"\n

Ballard Partners, a lobbying company headed by a leading fundraiser for President Donald Trump<\/a>, has more than tripled its quarterly lobbying gains compared with the exact period a year earlier, as businesses and organizations have sought assistance from a small group of firms allied to the new administration in trying to make sense of a second Trump administration characterized by turmoil and retribution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company will bring in $14 million of lobbying income for the first quarter of 2025, over two times the $6.2 million Ballard saw in the fourth quarter of 2024. Ballard recorded $4.2 million of lobbying income during the first quarter of 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Several of K Street's largest firms are yet to post first quarter revenues as of Monday night's midnight reporting deadline, but Ballard's totals will be right up at the top when the numbers finally appear. Starting a new administration normally is big money for the lobby industry \u2014 and K Street business was red hot before Trump returned to the presidency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to analysis, the company topped the income chart at year-end with $16.9 million in the fourth quarter, followed by runner-up Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, which raked in $14.6 million during the quarter. In the first quarter of 2025, Brownstein's revenue decreased to $16.8 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Florida lobbyist, Brian Ballard, also a longtime, opened a office in Washington for his firm soon after Trump's first White House win in 2017 and quickly became one of the go-to company for corporations and trade groups looking to comprehend the mercurial political newcomer in the White House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While the company has a<\/a> number of Democratic lobbyists on its list, the firm's business suffered under the Biden administration. Nevertheless, it was still in the top 20 of K Street firms, POLITICO's analysis found.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ballard's ascent this year marks a cycle that occurs each time there is a change of power in Washington, as corporate America searches for an angle with an incoming president or congressional chief.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But that rhythm went into overdrive leading up to Trump's second term. Ballard, along with a few other companies with strong connections to the administration, such as Miller Strategies, Mercury Public Affairs, Michael Best Strategies and Continental Strategies, have experienced a wave of new clients since November. Those players did not return requests for their first quarter figures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Ballard has revealed over 130 new lobbying clients since Election Day alone, including JPMorgan Chase, Chevron, Palantir, Netflix, Ripple Labs and the Business Roundtable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company also signed up to lobby on behalf of a number of individuals and organizations targeted for punishment by the Trump administration, including the Harvard University governing board, the Public Broadcasting Service and law organization Kirkland & Ellis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some of Ballard's ex-lobbyists now carry senior positions in Trump's second administration, including Pam Bondi, Attorney General and Susie Wiles, White House chief of staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trent Morse, another Ballard alum, is the deputy director of personnel for Trump. The Florida origins of the firm also result in Ballard having ties to the Floridians who hold sway in Trump's Washington, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Trump fundraiser\u2019s lobbying firm triples earnings mid washington power shift","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trump-fundraisers-lobbying-firm-triples-earnings-mid-washington-power-shift","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7583","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7576,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_content":"\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

\u201cThe note I obtained when I came [in Washington] was: clean up your own home, and then come converse to us,\u201d <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

NCAA president Charlie Baker commented to reporters during the men\u2019s Final Four. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA views the settlement as evidence that it has taken all possible steps to reform college sports, and now it\u2019s Congress\u2019 responsibility to intervene to safeguard the remaining rules and enable the legal enforcement of additional measures, such as transfer restrictions.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To achieve this, the NCAA seeks antitrust protections, the preemption of state laws regarding NIL (name, image, and likeness), and a clause that stops college athletes from being classified as employees. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last May, the NCAA and conferences defined the compensation plan as a \u201croad map\u201d for Congress. A federal judge is anticipated to issue a ruling on final approval within the next few weeks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"NCAA is instituting positive reforms for student-athletes and responding to different issues in college athletics by mandating health and wellness benefits and guaranteeing scholarships,\" the NCAA SVP for External Affairs added in a statement to Front Office Sports. \"But some of the threats facing college sports can only be addressed by Congress, and the Association is working with student-athletes and their institutions to push for bipartisan legislation.\" Buckley pointed out the NCAA\u2019s challenges in classifying athletes as amateurs and regulating the transfer portal, among other issues, that necessitate congressional support.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA works as a nonprofit, maintaining a permanent headquarters in Indianapolis with multiple workers responsible for executing titles, supporting laws, and certainly, lobbying. However, the NCAA sees itself as a \u201cmember-driven\u201d organization\u2014merely implementing the wishes of the schools it represents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Industry experts indicated that Republicans may have been more open to the NCAA\u2019s requests, which could explain their increased lobbying efforts to pass legislation. Nevertheless, sources have informed FOS that certain House and Senate Republicans oppose at least the NCAA\u2019s requested antitrust exemptions for several reasons, notably a lack of trust in the NCAA. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

From January to March, the NCAA disbursed $90,000 to its established lobbying firm, Brownstein Hyatt, as noted in a quarterly lobbying report submitted on April 18. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA invested $90,000 in lobbying efforts with theGroup DC, a significant player they engaged in January. theGroup DC symbolizes major customers like Pepsico and UnitedHealth Group. The firm\u2019s new client registration form lists three lobbyists: two with Democratic backgrounds and one with experience working for Republicans. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A budget of $270,000 was also allocated to the NCAA's lobbyists. Since 2018, Dawn Buth has been engaged full-time handling government ties. Buth worked independently for several years before the organization hired a second in-house lobbyist last July: Kevin McColaugh, who previously worked for NCAA president Charlie Baker when he served as governor of Massachusetts. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA generally allocates between $120,000<\/a> and $140,000 for its internal lobbying activities, a figure that remained the same with McColaugh's inclusion during the third and fourth quarters of 2024.<\/p>\n","post_title":"NCAA boosts Washington lobbying to secure legal shield","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"ncaa-boosts-washington-lobbying-to-secure-legal-shield","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7591","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7583,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content":"\n

Ballard Partners, a lobbying company headed by a leading fundraiser for President Donald Trump<\/a>, has more than tripled its quarterly lobbying gains compared with the exact period a year earlier, as businesses and organizations have sought assistance from a small group of firms allied to the new administration in trying to make sense of a second Trump administration characterized by turmoil and retribution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company will bring in $14 million of lobbying income for the first quarter of 2025, over two times the $6.2 million Ballard saw in the fourth quarter of 2024. Ballard recorded $4.2 million of lobbying income during the first quarter of 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Several of K Street's largest firms are yet to post first quarter revenues as of Monday night's midnight reporting deadline, but Ballard's totals will be right up at the top when the numbers finally appear. Starting a new administration normally is big money for the lobby industry \u2014 and K Street business was red hot before Trump returned to the presidency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to analysis, the company topped the income chart at year-end with $16.9 million in the fourth quarter, followed by runner-up Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, which raked in $14.6 million during the quarter. In the first quarter of 2025, Brownstein's revenue decreased to $16.8 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Florida lobbyist, Brian Ballard, also a longtime, opened a office in Washington for his firm soon after Trump's first White House win in 2017 and quickly became one of the go-to company for corporations and trade groups looking to comprehend the mercurial political newcomer in the White House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While the company has a<\/a> number of Democratic lobbyists on its list, the firm's business suffered under the Biden administration. Nevertheless, it was still in the top 20 of K Street firms, POLITICO's analysis found.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ballard's ascent this year marks a cycle that occurs each time there is a change of power in Washington, as corporate America searches for an angle with an incoming president or congressional chief.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But that rhythm went into overdrive leading up to Trump's second term. Ballard, along with a few other companies with strong connections to the administration, such as Miller Strategies, Mercury Public Affairs, Michael Best Strategies and Continental Strategies, have experienced a wave of new clients since November. Those players did not return requests for their first quarter figures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Ballard has revealed over 130 new lobbying clients since Election Day alone, including JPMorgan Chase, Chevron, Palantir, Netflix, Ripple Labs and the Business Roundtable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company also signed up to lobby on behalf of a number of individuals and organizations targeted for punishment by the Trump administration, including the Harvard University governing board, the Public Broadcasting Service and law organization Kirkland & Ellis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some of Ballard's ex-lobbyists now carry senior positions in Trump's second administration, including Pam Bondi, Attorney General and Susie Wiles, White House chief of staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trent Morse, another Ballard alum, is the deputy director of personnel for Trump. The Florida origins of the firm also result in Ballard having ties to the Floridians who hold sway in Trump's Washington, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Trump fundraiser\u2019s lobbying firm triples earnings mid washington power shift","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trump-fundraisers-lobbying-firm-triples-earnings-mid-washington-power-shift","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7583","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7576,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_content":"\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n
\n

\u201cThe note I obtained when I came [in Washington] was: clean up your own home, and then come converse to us,\u201d <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

NCAA president Charlie Baker commented to reporters during the men\u2019s Final Four. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA views the settlement as evidence that it has taken all possible steps to reform college sports, and now it\u2019s Congress\u2019 responsibility to intervene to safeguard the remaining rules and enable the legal enforcement of additional measures, such as transfer restrictions.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To achieve this, the NCAA seeks antitrust protections, the preemption of state laws regarding NIL (name, image, and likeness), and a clause that stops college athletes from being classified as employees. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last May, the NCAA and conferences defined the compensation plan as a \u201croad map\u201d for Congress. A federal judge is anticipated to issue a ruling on final approval within the next few weeks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"NCAA is instituting positive reforms for student-athletes and responding to different issues in college athletics by mandating health and wellness benefits and guaranteeing scholarships,\" the NCAA SVP for External Affairs added in a statement to Front Office Sports. \"But some of the threats facing college sports can only be addressed by Congress, and the Association is working with student-athletes and their institutions to push for bipartisan legislation.\" Buckley pointed out the NCAA\u2019s challenges in classifying athletes as amateurs and regulating the transfer portal, among other issues, that necessitate congressional support.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA works as a nonprofit, maintaining a permanent headquarters in Indianapolis with multiple workers responsible for executing titles, supporting laws, and certainly, lobbying. However, the NCAA sees itself as a \u201cmember-driven\u201d organization\u2014merely implementing the wishes of the schools it represents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Industry experts indicated that Republicans may have been more open to the NCAA\u2019s requests, which could explain their increased lobbying efforts to pass legislation. Nevertheless, sources have informed FOS that certain House and Senate Republicans oppose at least the NCAA\u2019s requested antitrust exemptions for several reasons, notably a lack of trust in the NCAA. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

From January to March, the NCAA disbursed $90,000 to its established lobbying firm, Brownstein Hyatt, as noted in a quarterly lobbying report submitted on April 18. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA invested $90,000 in lobbying efforts with theGroup DC, a significant player they engaged in January. theGroup DC symbolizes major customers like Pepsico and UnitedHealth Group. The firm\u2019s new client registration form lists three lobbyists: two with Democratic backgrounds and one with experience working for Republicans. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A budget of $270,000 was also allocated to the NCAA's lobbyists. Since 2018, Dawn Buth has been engaged full-time handling government ties. Buth worked independently for several years before the organization hired a second in-house lobbyist last July: Kevin McColaugh, who previously worked for NCAA president Charlie Baker when he served as governor of Massachusetts. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA generally allocates between $120,000<\/a> and $140,000 for its internal lobbying activities, a figure that remained the same with McColaugh's inclusion during the third and fourth quarters of 2024.<\/p>\n","post_title":"NCAA boosts Washington lobbying to secure legal shield","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"ncaa-boosts-washington-lobbying-to-secure-legal-shield","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7591","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7583,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content":"\n

Ballard Partners, a lobbying company headed by a leading fundraiser for President Donald Trump<\/a>, has more than tripled its quarterly lobbying gains compared with the exact period a year earlier, as businesses and organizations have sought assistance from a small group of firms allied to the new administration in trying to make sense of a second Trump administration characterized by turmoil and retribution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company will bring in $14 million of lobbying income for the first quarter of 2025, over two times the $6.2 million Ballard saw in the fourth quarter of 2024. Ballard recorded $4.2 million of lobbying income during the first quarter of 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Several of K Street's largest firms are yet to post first quarter revenues as of Monday night's midnight reporting deadline, but Ballard's totals will be right up at the top when the numbers finally appear. Starting a new administration normally is big money for the lobby industry \u2014 and K Street business was red hot before Trump returned to the presidency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to analysis, the company topped the income chart at year-end with $16.9 million in the fourth quarter, followed by runner-up Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, which raked in $14.6 million during the quarter. In the first quarter of 2025, Brownstein's revenue decreased to $16.8 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Florida lobbyist, Brian Ballard, also a longtime, opened a office in Washington for his firm soon after Trump's first White House win in 2017 and quickly became one of the go-to company for corporations and trade groups looking to comprehend the mercurial political newcomer in the White House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While the company has a<\/a> number of Democratic lobbyists on its list, the firm's business suffered under the Biden administration. Nevertheless, it was still in the top 20 of K Street firms, POLITICO's analysis found.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ballard's ascent this year marks a cycle that occurs each time there is a change of power in Washington, as corporate America searches for an angle with an incoming president or congressional chief.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But that rhythm went into overdrive leading up to Trump's second term. Ballard, along with a few other companies with strong connections to the administration, such as Miller Strategies, Mercury Public Affairs, Michael Best Strategies and Continental Strategies, have experienced a wave of new clients since November. Those players did not return requests for their first quarter figures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Ballard has revealed over 130 new lobbying clients since Election Day alone, including JPMorgan Chase, Chevron, Palantir, Netflix, Ripple Labs and the Business Roundtable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company also signed up to lobby on behalf of a number of individuals and organizations targeted for punishment by the Trump administration, including the Harvard University governing board, the Public Broadcasting Service and law organization Kirkland & Ellis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some of Ballard's ex-lobbyists now carry senior positions in Trump's second administration, including Pam Bondi, Attorney General and Susie Wiles, White House chief of staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trent Morse, another Ballard alum, is the deputy director of personnel for Trump. The Florida origins of the firm also result in Ballard having ties to the Floridians who hold sway in Trump's Washington, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Trump fundraiser\u2019s lobbying firm triples earnings mid washington power shift","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trump-fundraisers-lobbying-firm-triples-earnings-mid-washington-power-shift","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7583","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7576,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_content":"\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Since last year, the NCAA has been trying to persuade Congress to formalize the terms of the House v. NCAA settlement. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe note I obtained when I came [in Washington] was: clean up your own home, and then come converse to us,\u201d <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

NCAA president Charlie Baker commented to reporters during the men\u2019s Final Four. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA views the settlement as evidence that it has taken all possible steps to reform college sports, and now it\u2019s Congress\u2019 responsibility to intervene to safeguard the remaining rules and enable the legal enforcement of additional measures, such as transfer restrictions.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To achieve this, the NCAA seeks antitrust protections, the preemption of state laws regarding NIL (name, image, and likeness), and a clause that stops college athletes from being classified as employees. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last May, the NCAA and conferences defined the compensation plan as a \u201croad map\u201d for Congress. A federal judge is anticipated to issue a ruling on final approval within the next few weeks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"NCAA is instituting positive reforms for student-athletes and responding to different issues in college athletics by mandating health and wellness benefits and guaranteeing scholarships,\" the NCAA SVP for External Affairs added in a statement to Front Office Sports. \"But some of the threats facing college sports can only be addressed by Congress, and the Association is working with student-athletes and their institutions to push for bipartisan legislation.\" Buckley pointed out the NCAA\u2019s challenges in classifying athletes as amateurs and regulating the transfer portal, among other issues, that necessitate congressional support.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA works as a nonprofit, maintaining a permanent headquarters in Indianapolis with multiple workers responsible for executing titles, supporting laws, and certainly, lobbying. However, the NCAA sees itself as a \u201cmember-driven\u201d organization\u2014merely implementing the wishes of the schools it represents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Industry experts indicated that Republicans may have been more open to the NCAA\u2019s requests, which could explain their increased lobbying efforts to pass legislation. Nevertheless, sources have informed FOS that certain House and Senate Republicans oppose at least the NCAA\u2019s requested antitrust exemptions for several reasons, notably a lack of trust in the NCAA. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

From January to March, the NCAA disbursed $90,000 to its established lobbying firm, Brownstein Hyatt, as noted in a quarterly lobbying report submitted on April 18. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA invested $90,000 in lobbying efforts with theGroup DC, a significant player they engaged in January. theGroup DC symbolizes major customers like Pepsico and UnitedHealth Group. The firm\u2019s new client registration form lists three lobbyists: two with Democratic backgrounds and one with experience working for Republicans. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A budget of $270,000 was also allocated to the NCAA's lobbyists. Since 2018, Dawn Buth has been engaged full-time handling government ties. Buth worked independently for several years before the organization hired a second in-house lobbyist last July: Kevin McColaugh, who previously worked for NCAA president Charlie Baker when he served as governor of Massachusetts. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA generally allocates between $120,000<\/a> and $140,000 for its internal lobbying activities, a figure that remained the same with McColaugh's inclusion during the third and fourth quarters of 2024.<\/p>\n","post_title":"NCAA boosts Washington lobbying to secure legal shield","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"ncaa-boosts-washington-lobbying-to-secure-legal-shield","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7591","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7583,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content":"\n

Ballard Partners, a lobbying company headed by a leading fundraiser for President Donald Trump<\/a>, has more than tripled its quarterly lobbying gains compared with the exact period a year earlier, as businesses and organizations have sought assistance from a small group of firms allied to the new administration in trying to make sense of a second Trump administration characterized by turmoil and retribution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company will bring in $14 million of lobbying income for the first quarter of 2025, over two times the $6.2 million Ballard saw in the fourth quarter of 2024. Ballard recorded $4.2 million of lobbying income during the first quarter of 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Several of K Street's largest firms are yet to post first quarter revenues as of Monday night's midnight reporting deadline, but Ballard's totals will be right up at the top when the numbers finally appear. Starting a new administration normally is big money for the lobby industry \u2014 and K Street business was red hot before Trump returned to the presidency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to analysis, the company topped the income chart at year-end with $16.9 million in the fourth quarter, followed by runner-up Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, which raked in $14.6 million during the quarter. In the first quarter of 2025, Brownstein's revenue decreased to $16.8 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Florida lobbyist, Brian Ballard, also a longtime, opened a office in Washington for his firm soon after Trump's first White House win in 2017 and quickly became one of the go-to company for corporations and trade groups looking to comprehend the mercurial political newcomer in the White House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While the company has a<\/a> number of Democratic lobbyists on its list, the firm's business suffered under the Biden administration. Nevertheless, it was still in the top 20 of K Street firms, POLITICO's analysis found.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ballard's ascent this year marks a cycle that occurs each time there is a change of power in Washington, as corporate America searches for an angle with an incoming president or congressional chief.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But that rhythm went into overdrive leading up to Trump's second term. Ballard, along with a few other companies with strong connections to the administration, such as Miller Strategies, Mercury Public Affairs, Michael Best Strategies and Continental Strategies, have experienced a wave of new clients since November. Those players did not return requests for their first quarter figures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Ballard has revealed over 130 new lobbying clients since Election Day alone, including JPMorgan Chase, Chevron, Palantir, Netflix, Ripple Labs and the Business Roundtable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company also signed up to lobby on behalf of a number of individuals and organizations targeted for punishment by the Trump administration, including the Harvard University governing board, the Public Broadcasting Service and law organization Kirkland & Ellis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some of Ballard's ex-lobbyists now carry senior positions in Trump's second administration, including Pam Bondi, Attorney General and Susie Wiles, White House chief of staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trent Morse, another Ballard alum, is the deputy director of personnel for Trump. The Florida origins of the firm also result in Ballard having ties to the Floridians who hold sway in Trump's Washington, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Trump fundraiser\u2019s lobbying firm triples earnings mid washington power shift","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trump-fundraisers-lobbying-firm-triples-earnings-mid-washington-power-shift","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7583","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7576,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_content":"\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

The agency disbursed $450,000 on lobbying during 2025's first quarter, nearly doubled the payment it spent during the corresponding period in 2024. The payment is a continuance of the NCAA\u2019s decades-long federal lobbying measure to persuade Congress enact a law that would grant it influence over the amateurism regulations that remain. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Since last year, the NCAA has been trying to persuade Congress to formalize the terms of the House v. NCAA settlement. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe note I obtained when I came [in Washington] was: clean up your own home, and then come converse to us,\u201d <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

NCAA president Charlie Baker commented to reporters during the men\u2019s Final Four. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA views the settlement as evidence that it has taken all possible steps to reform college sports, and now it\u2019s Congress\u2019 responsibility to intervene to safeguard the remaining rules and enable the legal enforcement of additional measures, such as transfer restrictions.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To achieve this, the NCAA seeks antitrust protections, the preemption of state laws regarding NIL (name, image, and likeness), and a clause that stops college athletes from being classified as employees. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last May, the NCAA and conferences defined the compensation plan as a \u201croad map\u201d for Congress. A federal judge is anticipated to issue a ruling on final approval within the next few weeks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"NCAA is instituting positive reforms for student-athletes and responding to different issues in college athletics by mandating health and wellness benefits and guaranteeing scholarships,\" the NCAA SVP for External Affairs added in a statement to Front Office Sports. \"But some of the threats facing college sports can only be addressed by Congress, and the Association is working with student-athletes and their institutions to push for bipartisan legislation.\" Buckley pointed out the NCAA\u2019s challenges in classifying athletes as amateurs and regulating the transfer portal, among other issues, that necessitate congressional support.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA works as a nonprofit, maintaining a permanent headquarters in Indianapolis with multiple workers responsible for executing titles, supporting laws, and certainly, lobbying. However, the NCAA sees itself as a \u201cmember-driven\u201d organization\u2014merely implementing the wishes of the schools it represents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Industry experts indicated that Republicans may have been more open to the NCAA\u2019s requests, which could explain their increased lobbying efforts to pass legislation. Nevertheless, sources have informed FOS that certain House and Senate Republicans oppose at least the NCAA\u2019s requested antitrust exemptions for several reasons, notably a lack of trust in the NCAA. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

From January to March, the NCAA disbursed $90,000 to its established lobbying firm, Brownstein Hyatt, as noted in a quarterly lobbying report submitted on April 18. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA invested $90,000 in lobbying efforts with theGroup DC, a significant player they engaged in January. theGroup DC symbolizes major customers like Pepsico and UnitedHealth Group. The firm\u2019s new client registration form lists three lobbyists: two with Democratic backgrounds and one with experience working for Republicans. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A budget of $270,000 was also allocated to the NCAA's lobbyists. Since 2018, Dawn Buth has been engaged full-time handling government ties. Buth worked independently for several years before the organization hired a second in-house lobbyist last July: Kevin McColaugh, who previously worked for NCAA president Charlie Baker when he served as governor of Massachusetts. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA generally allocates between $120,000<\/a> and $140,000 for its internal lobbying activities, a figure that remained the same with McColaugh's inclusion during the third and fourth quarters of 2024.<\/p>\n","post_title":"NCAA boosts Washington lobbying to secure legal shield","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"ncaa-boosts-washington-lobbying-to-secure-legal-shield","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7591","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7583,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content":"\n

Ballard Partners, a lobbying company headed by a leading fundraiser for President Donald Trump<\/a>, has more than tripled its quarterly lobbying gains compared with the exact period a year earlier, as businesses and organizations have sought assistance from a small group of firms allied to the new administration in trying to make sense of a second Trump administration characterized by turmoil and retribution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company will bring in $14 million of lobbying income for the first quarter of 2025, over two times the $6.2 million Ballard saw in the fourth quarter of 2024. Ballard recorded $4.2 million of lobbying income during the first quarter of 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Several of K Street's largest firms are yet to post first quarter revenues as of Monday night's midnight reporting deadline, but Ballard's totals will be right up at the top when the numbers finally appear. Starting a new administration normally is big money for the lobby industry \u2014 and K Street business was red hot before Trump returned to the presidency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to analysis, the company topped the income chart at year-end with $16.9 million in the fourth quarter, followed by runner-up Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, which raked in $14.6 million during the quarter. In the first quarter of 2025, Brownstein's revenue decreased to $16.8 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Florida lobbyist, Brian Ballard, also a longtime, opened a office in Washington for his firm soon after Trump's first White House win in 2017 and quickly became one of the go-to company for corporations and trade groups looking to comprehend the mercurial political newcomer in the White House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While the company has a<\/a> number of Democratic lobbyists on its list, the firm's business suffered under the Biden administration. Nevertheless, it was still in the top 20 of K Street firms, POLITICO's analysis found.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ballard's ascent this year marks a cycle that occurs each time there is a change of power in Washington, as corporate America searches for an angle with an incoming president or congressional chief.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But that rhythm went into overdrive leading up to Trump's second term. Ballard, along with a few other companies with strong connections to the administration, such as Miller Strategies, Mercury Public Affairs, Michael Best Strategies and Continental Strategies, have experienced a wave of new clients since November. Those players did not return requests for their first quarter figures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Ballard has revealed over 130 new lobbying clients since Election Day alone, including JPMorgan Chase, Chevron, Palantir, Netflix, Ripple Labs and the Business Roundtable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company also signed up to lobby on behalf of a number of individuals and organizations targeted for punishment by the Trump administration, including the Harvard University governing board, the Public Broadcasting Service and law organization Kirkland & Ellis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some of Ballard's ex-lobbyists now carry senior positions in Trump's second administration, including Pam Bondi, Attorney General and Susie Wiles, White House chief of staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trent Morse, another Ballard alum, is the deputy director of personnel for Trump. The Florida origins of the firm also result in Ballard having ties to the Floridians who hold sway in Trump's Washington, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Trump fundraiser\u2019s lobbying firm triples earnings mid washington power shift","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trump-fundraisers-lobbying-firm-triples-earnings-mid-washington-power-shift","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7583","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7576,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_content":"\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

The NCAA is strengthening its federal lobbying moves in the beginning of the Trump <\/a>government, expending hundreds of thousands of bucks to control the newly Republican-headed Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The agency disbursed $450,000 on lobbying during 2025's first quarter, nearly doubled the payment it spent during the corresponding period in 2024. The payment is a continuance of the NCAA\u2019s decades-long federal lobbying measure to persuade Congress enact a law that would grant it influence over the amateurism regulations that remain. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Since last year, the NCAA has been trying to persuade Congress to formalize the terms of the House v. NCAA settlement. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe note I obtained when I came [in Washington] was: clean up your own home, and then come converse to us,\u201d <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

NCAA president Charlie Baker commented to reporters during the men\u2019s Final Four. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA views the settlement as evidence that it has taken all possible steps to reform college sports, and now it\u2019s Congress\u2019 responsibility to intervene to safeguard the remaining rules and enable the legal enforcement of additional measures, such as transfer restrictions.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To achieve this, the NCAA seeks antitrust protections, the preemption of state laws regarding NIL (name, image, and likeness), and a clause that stops college athletes from being classified as employees. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last May, the NCAA and conferences defined the compensation plan as a \u201croad map\u201d for Congress. A federal judge is anticipated to issue a ruling on final approval within the next few weeks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"NCAA is instituting positive reforms for student-athletes and responding to different issues in college athletics by mandating health and wellness benefits and guaranteeing scholarships,\" the NCAA SVP for External Affairs added in a statement to Front Office Sports. \"But some of the threats facing college sports can only be addressed by Congress, and the Association is working with student-athletes and their institutions to push for bipartisan legislation.\" Buckley pointed out the NCAA\u2019s challenges in classifying athletes as amateurs and regulating the transfer portal, among other issues, that necessitate congressional support.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA works as a nonprofit, maintaining a permanent headquarters in Indianapolis with multiple workers responsible for executing titles, supporting laws, and certainly, lobbying. However, the NCAA sees itself as a \u201cmember-driven\u201d organization\u2014merely implementing the wishes of the schools it represents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Industry experts indicated that Republicans may have been more open to the NCAA\u2019s requests, which could explain their increased lobbying efforts to pass legislation. Nevertheless, sources have informed FOS that certain House and Senate Republicans oppose at least the NCAA\u2019s requested antitrust exemptions for several reasons, notably a lack of trust in the NCAA. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

From January to March, the NCAA disbursed $90,000 to its established lobbying firm, Brownstein Hyatt, as noted in a quarterly lobbying report submitted on April 18. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA invested $90,000 in lobbying efforts with theGroup DC, a significant player they engaged in January. theGroup DC symbolizes major customers like Pepsico and UnitedHealth Group. The firm\u2019s new client registration form lists three lobbyists: two with Democratic backgrounds and one with experience working for Republicans. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A budget of $270,000 was also allocated to the NCAA's lobbyists. Since 2018, Dawn Buth has been engaged full-time handling government ties. Buth worked independently for several years before the organization hired a second in-house lobbyist last July: Kevin McColaugh, who previously worked for NCAA president Charlie Baker when he served as governor of Massachusetts. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA generally allocates between $120,000<\/a> and $140,000 for its internal lobbying activities, a figure that remained the same with McColaugh's inclusion during the third and fourth quarters of 2024.<\/p>\n","post_title":"NCAA boosts Washington lobbying to secure legal shield","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"ncaa-boosts-washington-lobbying-to-secure-legal-shield","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7591","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7583,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content":"\n

Ballard Partners, a lobbying company headed by a leading fundraiser for President Donald Trump<\/a>, has more than tripled its quarterly lobbying gains compared with the exact period a year earlier, as businesses and organizations have sought assistance from a small group of firms allied to the new administration in trying to make sense of a second Trump administration characterized by turmoil and retribution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company will bring in $14 million of lobbying income for the first quarter of 2025, over two times the $6.2 million Ballard saw in the fourth quarter of 2024. Ballard recorded $4.2 million of lobbying income during the first quarter of 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Several of K Street's largest firms are yet to post first quarter revenues as of Monday night's midnight reporting deadline, but Ballard's totals will be right up at the top when the numbers finally appear. Starting a new administration normally is big money for the lobby industry \u2014 and K Street business was red hot before Trump returned to the presidency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to analysis, the company topped the income chart at year-end with $16.9 million in the fourth quarter, followed by runner-up Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, which raked in $14.6 million during the quarter. In the first quarter of 2025, Brownstein's revenue decreased to $16.8 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Florida lobbyist, Brian Ballard, also a longtime, opened a office in Washington for his firm soon after Trump's first White House win in 2017 and quickly became one of the go-to company for corporations and trade groups looking to comprehend the mercurial political newcomer in the White House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While the company has a<\/a> number of Democratic lobbyists on its list, the firm's business suffered under the Biden administration. Nevertheless, it was still in the top 20 of K Street firms, POLITICO's analysis found.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ballard's ascent this year marks a cycle that occurs each time there is a change of power in Washington, as corporate America searches for an angle with an incoming president or congressional chief.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But that rhythm went into overdrive leading up to Trump's second term. Ballard, along with a few other companies with strong connections to the administration, such as Miller Strategies, Mercury Public Affairs, Michael Best Strategies and Continental Strategies, have experienced a wave of new clients since November. Those players did not return requests for their first quarter figures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Ballard has revealed over 130 new lobbying clients since Election Day alone, including JPMorgan Chase, Chevron, Palantir, Netflix, Ripple Labs and the Business Roundtable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company also signed up to lobby on behalf of a number of individuals and organizations targeted for punishment by the Trump administration, including the Harvard University governing board, the Public Broadcasting Service and law organization Kirkland & Ellis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some of Ballard's ex-lobbyists now carry senior positions in Trump's second administration, including Pam Bondi, Attorney General and Susie Wiles, White House chief of staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trent Morse, another Ballard alum, is the deputy director of personnel for Trump. The Florida origins of the firm also result in Ballard having ties to the Floridians who hold sway in Trump's Washington, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Trump fundraiser\u2019s lobbying firm triples earnings mid washington power shift","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trump-fundraisers-lobbying-firm-triples-earnings-mid-washington-power-shift","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7583","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7576,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_content":"\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

states the letter.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Automakers united in lobbying Trump against proposed auto parts tariff","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"automakers-united-in-lobbying-trump-against-proposed-auto-parts-tariff","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 20:21:32","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 20:21:32","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7598","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7591,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content":"\n

The NCAA is strengthening its federal lobbying moves in the beginning of the Trump <\/a>government, expending hundreds of thousands of bucks to control the newly Republican-headed Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The agency disbursed $450,000 on lobbying during 2025's first quarter, nearly doubled the payment it spent during the corresponding period in 2024. The payment is a continuance of the NCAA\u2019s decades-long federal lobbying measure to persuade Congress enact a law that would grant it influence over the amateurism regulations that remain. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Since last year, the NCAA has been trying to persuade Congress to formalize the terms of the House v. NCAA settlement. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe note I obtained when I came [in Washington] was: clean up your own home, and then come converse to us,\u201d <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

NCAA president Charlie Baker commented to reporters during the men\u2019s Final Four. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA views the settlement as evidence that it has taken all possible steps to reform college sports, and now it\u2019s Congress\u2019 responsibility to intervene to safeguard the remaining rules and enable the legal enforcement of additional measures, such as transfer restrictions.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To achieve this, the NCAA seeks antitrust protections, the preemption of state laws regarding NIL (name, image, and likeness), and a clause that stops college athletes from being classified as employees. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last May, the NCAA and conferences defined the compensation plan as a \u201croad map\u201d for Congress. A federal judge is anticipated to issue a ruling on final approval within the next few weeks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"NCAA is instituting positive reforms for student-athletes and responding to different issues in college athletics by mandating health and wellness benefits and guaranteeing scholarships,\" the NCAA SVP for External Affairs added in a statement to Front Office Sports. \"But some of the threats facing college sports can only be addressed by Congress, and the Association is working with student-athletes and their institutions to push for bipartisan legislation.\" Buckley pointed out the NCAA\u2019s challenges in classifying athletes as amateurs and regulating the transfer portal, among other issues, that necessitate congressional support.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA works as a nonprofit, maintaining a permanent headquarters in Indianapolis with multiple workers responsible for executing titles, supporting laws, and certainly, lobbying. However, the NCAA sees itself as a \u201cmember-driven\u201d organization\u2014merely implementing the wishes of the schools it represents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Industry experts indicated that Republicans may have been more open to the NCAA\u2019s requests, which could explain their increased lobbying efforts to pass legislation. Nevertheless, sources have informed FOS that certain House and Senate Republicans oppose at least the NCAA\u2019s requested antitrust exemptions for several reasons, notably a lack of trust in the NCAA. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

From January to March, the NCAA disbursed $90,000 to its established lobbying firm, Brownstein Hyatt, as noted in a quarterly lobbying report submitted on April 18. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA invested $90,000 in lobbying efforts with theGroup DC, a significant player they engaged in January. theGroup DC symbolizes major customers like Pepsico and UnitedHealth Group. The firm\u2019s new client registration form lists three lobbyists: two with Democratic backgrounds and one with experience working for Republicans. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A budget of $270,000 was also allocated to the NCAA's lobbyists. Since 2018, Dawn Buth has been engaged full-time handling government ties. Buth worked independently for several years before the organization hired a second in-house lobbyist last July: Kevin McColaugh, who previously worked for NCAA president Charlie Baker when he served as governor of Massachusetts. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA generally allocates between $120,000<\/a> and $140,000 for its internal lobbying activities, a figure that remained the same with McColaugh's inclusion during the third and fourth quarters of 2024.<\/p>\n","post_title":"NCAA boosts Washington lobbying to secure legal shield","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"ncaa-boosts-washington-lobbying-to-secure-legal-shield","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7591","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7583,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content":"\n

Ballard Partners, a lobbying company headed by a leading fundraiser for President Donald Trump<\/a>, has more than tripled its quarterly lobbying gains compared with the exact period a year earlier, as businesses and organizations have sought assistance from a small group of firms allied to the new administration in trying to make sense of a second Trump administration characterized by turmoil and retribution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company will bring in $14 million of lobbying income for the first quarter of 2025, over two times the $6.2 million Ballard saw in the fourth quarter of 2024. Ballard recorded $4.2 million of lobbying income during the first quarter of 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Several of K Street's largest firms are yet to post first quarter revenues as of Monday night's midnight reporting deadline, but Ballard's totals will be right up at the top when the numbers finally appear. Starting a new administration normally is big money for the lobby industry \u2014 and K Street business was red hot before Trump returned to the presidency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to analysis, the company topped the income chart at year-end with $16.9 million in the fourth quarter, followed by runner-up Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, which raked in $14.6 million during the quarter. In the first quarter of 2025, Brownstein's revenue decreased to $16.8 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Florida lobbyist, Brian Ballard, also a longtime, opened a office in Washington for his firm soon after Trump's first White House win in 2017 and quickly became one of the go-to company for corporations and trade groups looking to comprehend the mercurial political newcomer in the White House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While the company has a<\/a> number of Democratic lobbyists on its list, the firm's business suffered under the Biden administration. Nevertheless, it was still in the top 20 of K Street firms, POLITICO's analysis found.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ballard's ascent this year marks a cycle that occurs each time there is a change of power in Washington, as corporate America searches for an angle with an incoming president or congressional chief.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But that rhythm went into overdrive leading up to Trump's second term. Ballard, along with a few other companies with strong connections to the administration, such as Miller Strategies, Mercury Public Affairs, Michael Best Strategies and Continental Strategies, have experienced a wave of new clients since November. Those players did not return requests for their first quarter figures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Ballard has revealed over 130 new lobbying clients since Election Day alone, including JPMorgan Chase, Chevron, Palantir, Netflix, Ripple Labs and the Business Roundtable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company also signed up to lobby on behalf of a number of individuals and organizations targeted for punishment by the Trump administration, including the Harvard University governing board, the Public Broadcasting Service and law organization Kirkland & Ellis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some of Ballard's ex-lobbyists now carry senior positions in Trump's second administration, including Pam Bondi, Attorney General and Susie Wiles, White House chief of staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trent Morse, another Ballard alum, is the deputy director of personnel for Trump. The Florida origins of the firm also result in Ballard having ties to the Floridians who hold sway in Trump's Washington, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Trump fundraiser\u2019s lobbying firm triples earnings mid washington power shift","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trump-fundraisers-lobbying-firm-triples-earnings-mid-washington-power-shift","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7583","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7576,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_content":"\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

\u201cWe promote increased manufacturing and additional supply chains within the United States, but it is unfeasible to shift global supply chains overnight or even within months. This process will require time,\u201d <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

states the letter.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Automakers united in lobbying Trump against proposed auto parts tariff","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"automakers-united-in-lobbying-trump-against-proposed-auto-parts-tariff","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 20:21:32","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 20:21:32","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7598","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7591,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content":"\n

The NCAA is strengthening its federal lobbying moves in the beginning of the Trump <\/a>government, expending hundreds of thousands of bucks to control the newly Republican-headed Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The agency disbursed $450,000 on lobbying during 2025's first quarter, nearly doubled the payment it spent during the corresponding period in 2024. The payment is a continuance of the NCAA\u2019s decades-long federal lobbying measure to persuade Congress enact a law that would grant it influence over the amateurism regulations that remain. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Since last year, the NCAA has been trying to persuade Congress to formalize the terms of the House v. NCAA settlement. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe note I obtained when I came [in Washington] was: clean up your own home, and then come converse to us,\u201d <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

NCAA president Charlie Baker commented to reporters during the men\u2019s Final Four. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA views the settlement as evidence that it has taken all possible steps to reform college sports, and now it\u2019s Congress\u2019 responsibility to intervene to safeguard the remaining rules and enable the legal enforcement of additional measures, such as transfer restrictions.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To achieve this, the NCAA seeks antitrust protections, the preemption of state laws regarding NIL (name, image, and likeness), and a clause that stops college athletes from being classified as employees. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last May, the NCAA and conferences defined the compensation plan as a \u201croad map\u201d for Congress. A federal judge is anticipated to issue a ruling on final approval within the next few weeks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"NCAA is instituting positive reforms for student-athletes and responding to different issues in college athletics by mandating health and wellness benefits and guaranteeing scholarships,\" the NCAA SVP for External Affairs added in a statement to Front Office Sports. \"But some of the threats facing college sports can only be addressed by Congress, and the Association is working with student-athletes and their institutions to push for bipartisan legislation.\" Buckley pointed out the NCAA\u2019s challenges in classifying athletes as amateurs and regulating the transfer portal, among other issues, that necessitate congressional support.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA works as a nonprofit, maintaining a permanent headquarters in Indianapolis with multiple workers responsible for executing titles, supporting laws, and certainly, lobbying. However, the NCAA sees itself as a \u201cmember-driven\u201d organization\u2014merely implementing the wishes of the schools it represents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Industry experts indicated that Republicans may have been more open to the NCAA\u2019s requests, which could explain their increased lobbying efforts to pass legislation. Nevertheless, sources have informed FOS that certain House and Senate Republicans oppose at least the NCAA\u2019s requested antitrust exemptions for several reasons, notably a lack of trust in the NCAA. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

From January to March, the NCAA disbursed $90,000 to its established lobbying firm, Brownstein Hyatt, as noted in a quarterly lobbying report submitted on April 18. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA invested $90,000 in lobbying efforts with theGroup DC, a significant player they engaged in January. theGroup DC symbolizes major customers like Pepsico and UnitedHealth Group. The firm\u2019s new client registration form lists three lobbyists: two with Democratic backgrounds and one with experience working for Republicans. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A budget of $270,000 was also allocated to the NCAA's lobbyists. Since 2018, Dawn Buth has been engaged full-time handling government ties. Buth worked independently for several years before the organization hired a second in-house lobbyist last July: Kevin McColaugh, who previously worked for NCAA president Charlie Baker when he served as governor of Massachusetts. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA generally allocates between $120,000<\/a> and $140,000 for its internal lobbying activities, a figure that remained the same with McColaugh's inclusion during the third and fourth quarters of 2024.<\/p>\n","post_title":"NCAA boosts Washington lobbying to secure legal shield","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"ncaa-boosts-washington-lobbying-to-secure-legal-shield","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7591","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7583,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content":"\n

Ballard Partners, a lobbying company headed by a leading fundraiser for President Donald Trump<\/a>, has more than tripled its quarterly lobbying gains compared with the exact period a year earlier, as businesses and organizations have sought assistance from a small group of firms allied to the new administration in trying to make sense of a second Trump administration characterized by turmoil and retribution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company will bring in $14 million of lobbying income for the first quarter of 2025, over two times the $6.2 million Ballard saw in the fourth quarter of 2024. Ballard recorded $4.2 million of lobbying income during the first quarter of 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Several of K Street's largest firms are yet to post first quarter revenues as of Monday night's midnight reporting deadline, but Ballard's totals will be right up at the top when the numbers finally appear. Starting a new administration normally is big money for the lobby industry \u2014 and K Street business was red hot before Trump returned to the presidency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to analysis, the company topped the income chart at year-end with $16.9 million in the fourth quarter, followed by runner-up Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, which raked in $14.6 million during the quarter. In the first quarter of 2025, Brownstein's revenue decreased to $16.8 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Florida lobbyist, Brian Ballard, also a longtime, opened a office in Washington for his firm soon after Trump's first White House win in 2017 and quickly became one of the go-to company for corporations and trade groups looking to comprehend the mercurial political newcomer in the White House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While the company has a<\/a> number of Democratic lobbyists on its list, the firm's business suffered under the Biden administration. Nevertheless, it was still in the top 20 of K Street firms, POLITICO's analysis found.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ballard's ascent this year marks a cycle that occurs each time there is a change of power in Washington, as corporate America searches for an angle with an incoming president or congressional chief.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But that rhythm went into overdrive leading up to Trump's second term. Ballard, along with a few other companies with strong connections to the administration, such as Miller Strategies, Mercury Public Affairs, Michael Best Strategies and Continental Strategies, have experienced a wave of new clients since November. Those players did not return requests for their first quarter figures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Ballard has revealed over 130 new lobbying clients since Election Day alone, including JPMorgan Chase, Chevron, Palantir, Netflix, Ripple Labs and the Business Roundtable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company also signed up to lobby on behalf of a number of individuals and organizations targeted for punishment by the Trump administration, including the Harvard University governing board, the Public Broadcasting Service and law organization Kirkland & Ellis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some of Ballard's ex-lobbyists now carry senior positions in Trump's second administration, including Pam Bondi, Attorney General and Susie Wiles, White House chief of staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trent Morse, another Ballard alum, is the deputy director of personnel for Trump. The Florida origins of the firm also result in Ballard having ties to the Floridians who hold sway in Trump's Washington, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Trump fundraiser\u2019s lobbying firm triples earnings mid washington power shift","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trump-fundraisers-lobbying-firm-triples-earnings-mid-washington-power-shift","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7583","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7576,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_content":"\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n
\n

\u201cWe promote increased manufacturing and additional supply chains within the United States, but it is unfeasible to shift global supply chains overnight or even within months. This process will require time,\u201d <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

states the letter.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Automakers united in lobbying Trump against proposed auto parts tariff","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"automakers-united-in-lobbying-trump-against-proposed-auto-parts-tariff","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 20:21:32","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 20:21:32","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7598","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7591,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content":"\n

The NCAA is strengthening its federal lobbying moves in the beginning of the Trump <\/a>government, expending hundreds of thousands of bucks to control the newly Republican-headed Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The agency disbursed $450,000 on lobbying during 2025's first quarter, nearly doubled the payment it spent during the corresponding period in 2024. The payment is a continuance of the NCAA\u2019s decades-long federal lobbying measure to persuade Congress enact a law that would grant it influence over the amateurism regulations that remain. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Since last year, the NCAA has been trying to persuade Congress to formalize the terms of the House v. NCAA settlement. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe note I obtained when I came [in Washington] was: clean up your own home, and then come converse to us,\u201d <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

NCAA president Charlie Baker commented to reporters during the men\u2019s Final Four. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA views the settlement as evidence that it has taken all possible steps to reform college sports, and now it\u2019s Congress\u2019 responsibility to intervene to safeguard the remaining rules and enable the legal enforcement of additional measures, such as transfer restrictions.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To achieve this, the NCAA seeks antitrust protections, the preemption of state laws regarding NIL (name, image, and likeness), and a clause that stops college athletes from being classified as employees. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last May, the NCAA and conferences defined the compensation plan as a \u201croad map\u201d for Congress. A federal judge is anticipated to issue a ruling on final approval within the next few weeks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"NCAA is instituting positive reforms for student-athletes and responding to different issues in college athletics by mandating health and wellness benefits and guaranteeing scholarships,\" the NCAA SVP for External Affairs added in a statement to Front Office Sports. \"But some of the threats facing college sports can only be addressed by Congress, and the Association is working with student-athletes and their institutions to push for bipartisan legislation.\" Buckley pointed out the NCAA\u2019s challenges in classifying athletes as amateurs and regulating the transfer portal, among other issues, that necessitate congressional support.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA works as a nonprofit, maintaining a permanent headquarters in Indianapolis with multiple workers responsible for executing titles, supporting laws, and certainly, lobbying. However, the NCAA sees itself as a \u201cmember-driven\u201d organization\u2014merely implementing the wishes of the schools it represents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Industry experts indicated that Republicans may have been more open to the NCAA\u2019s requests, which could explain their increased lobbying efforts to pass legislation. Nevertheless, sources have informed FOS that certain House and Senate Republicans oppose at least the NCAA\u2019s requested antitrust exemptions for several reasons, notably a lack of trust in the NCAA. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

From January to March, the NCAA disbursed $90,000 to its established lobbying firm, Brownstein Hyatt, as noted in a quarterly lobbying report submitted on April 18. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA invested $90,000 in lobbying efforts with theGroup DC, a significant player they engaged in January. theGroup DC symbolizes major customers like Pepsico and UnitedHealth Group. The firm\u2019s new client registration form lists three lobbyists: two with Democratic backgrounds and one with experience working for Republicans. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A budget of $270,000 was also allocated to the NCAA's lobbyists. Since 2018, Dawn Buth has been engaged full-time handling government ties. Buth worked independently for several years before the organization hired a second in-house lobbyist last July: Kevin McColaugh, who previously worked for NCAA president Charlie Baker when he served as governor of Massachusetts. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA generally allocates between $120,000<\/a> and $140,000 for its internal lobbying activities, a figure that remained the same with McColaugh's inclusion during the third and fourth quarters of 2024.<\/p>\n","post_title":"NCAA boosts Washington lobbying to secure legal shield","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"ncaa-boosts-washington-lobbying-to-secure-legal-shield","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7591","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7583,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content":"\n

Ballard Partners, a lobbying company headed by a leading fundraiser for President Donald Trump<\/a>, has more than tripled its quarterly lobbying gains compared with the exact period a year earlier, as businesses and organizations have sought assistance from a small group of firms allied to the new administration in trying to make sense of a second Trump administration characterized by turmoil and retribution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company will bring in $14 million of lobbying income for the first quarter of 2025, over two times the $6.2 million Ballard saw in the fourth quarter of 2024. Ballard recorded $4.2 million of lobbying income during the first quarter of 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Several of K Street's largest firms are yet to post first quarter revenues as of Monday night's midnight reporting deadline, but Ballard's totals will be right up at the top when the numbers finally appear. Starting a new administration normally is big money for the lobby industry \u2014 and K Street business was red hot before Trump returned to the presidency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to analysis, the company topped the income chart at year-end with $16.9 million in the fourth quarter, followed by runner-up Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, which raked in $14.6 million during the quarter. In the first quarter of 2025, Brownstein's revenue decreased to $16.8 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Florida lobbyist, Brian Ballard, also a longtime, opened a office in Washington for his firm soon after Trump's first White House win in 2017 and quickly became one of the go-to company for corporations and trade groups looking to comprehend the mercurial political newcomer in the White House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While the company has a<\/a> number of Democratic lobbyists on its list, the firm's business suffered under the Biden administration. Nevertheless, it was still in the top 20 of K Street firms, POLITICO's analysis found.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ballard's ascent this year marks a cycle that occurs each time there is a change of power in Washington, as corporate America searches for an angle with an incoming president or congressional chief.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But that rhythm went into overdrive leading up to Trump's second term. Ballard, along with a few other companies with strong connections to the administration, such as Miller Strategies, Mercury Public Affairs, Michael Best Strategies and Continental Strategies, have experienced a wave of new clients since November. Those players did not return requests for their first quarter figures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Ballard has revealed over 130 new lobbying clients since Election Day alone, including JPMorgan Chase, Chevron, Palantir, Netflix, Ripple Labs and the Business Roundtable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company also signed up to lobby on behalf of a number of individuals and organizations targeted for punishment by the Trump administration, including the Harvard University governing board, the Public Broadcasting Service and law organization Kirkland & Ellis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some of Ballard's ex-lobbyists now carry senior positions in Trump's second administration, including Pam Bondi, Attorney General and Susie Wiles, White House chief of staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trent Morse, another Ballard alum, is the deputy director of personnel for Trump. The Florida origins of the firm also result in Ballard having ties to the Floridians who hold sway in Trump's Washington, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Trump fundraiser\u2019s lobbying firm triples earnings mid washington power shift","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trump-fundraisers-lobbying-firm-triples-earnings-mid-washington-power-shift","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7583","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7576,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_content":"\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Automotive officials project a decrease in vehicle sales by millions of units, rising prices for both new and used vehicles, and costs surpassing $100 billion throughout the industry, as indicated by research statements from Wall Street and automotive reviewers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe promote increased manufacturing and additional supply chains within the United States, but it is unfeasible to shift global supply chains overnight or even within months. This process will require time,\u201d <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

states the letter.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Automakers united in lobbying Trump against proposed auto parts tariff","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"automakers-united-in-lobbying-trump-against-proposed-auto-parts-tariff","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 20:21:32","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 20:21:32","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7598","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7591,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content":"\n

The NCAA is strengthening its federal lobbying moves in the beginning of the Trump <\/a>government, expending hundreds of thousands of bucks to control the newly Republican-headed Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The agency disbursed $450,000 on lobbying during 2025's first quarter, nearly doubled the payment it spent during the corresponding period in 2024. The payment is a continuance of the NCAA\u2019s decades-long federal lobbying measure to persuade Congress enact a law that would grant it influence over the amateurism regulations that remain. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Since last year, the NCAA has been trying to persuade Congress to formalize the terms of the House v. NCAA settlement. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe note I obtained when I came [in Washington] was: clean up your own home, and then come converse to us,\u201d <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

NCAA president Charlie Baker commented to reporters during the men\u2019s Final Four. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA views the settlement as evidence that it has taken all possible steps to reform college sports, and now it\u2019s Congress\u2019 responsibility to intervene to safeguard the remaining rules and enable the legal enforcement of additional measures, such as transfer restrictions.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To achieve this, the NCAA seeks antitrust protections, the preemption of state laws regarding NIL (name, image, and likeness), and a clause that stops college athletes from being classified as employees. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last May, the NCAA and conferences defined the compensation plan as a \u201croad map\u201d for Congress. A federal judge is anticipated to issue a ruling on final approval within the next few weeks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"NCAA is instituting positive reforms for student-athletes and responding to different issues in college athletics by mandating health and wellness benefits and guaranteeing scholarships,\" the NCAA SVP for External Affairs added in a statement to Front Office Sports. \"But some of the threats facing college sports can only be addressed by Congress, and the Association is working with student-athletes and their institutions to push for bipartisan legislation.\" Buckley pointed out the NCAA\u2019s challenges in classifying athletes as amateurs and regulating the transfer portal, among other issues, that necessitate congressional support.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA works as a nonprofit, maintaining a permanent headquarters in Indianapolis with multiple workers responsible for executing titles, supporting laws, and certainly, lobbying. However, the NCAA sees itself as a \u201cmember-driven\u201d organization\u2014merely implementing the wishes of the schools it represents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Industry experts indicated that Republicans may have been more open to the NCAA\u2019s requests, which could explain their increased lobbying efforts to pass legislation. Nevertheless, sources have informed FOS that certain House and Senate Republicans oppose at least the NCAA\u2019s requested antitrust exemptions for several reasons, notably a lack of trust in the NCAA. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

From January to March, the NCAA disbursed $90,000 to its established lobbying firm, Brownstein Hyatt, as noted in a quarterly lobbying report submitted on April 18. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA invested $90,000 in lobbying efforts with theGroup DC, a significant player they engaged in January. theGroup DC symbolizes major customers like Pepsico and UnitedHealth Group. The firm\u2019s new client registration form lists three lobbyists: two with Democratic backgrounds and one with experience working for Republicans. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A budget of $270,000 was also allocated to the NCAA's lobbyists. Since 2018, Dawn Buth has been engaged full-time handling government ties. Buth worked independently for several years before the organization hired a second in-house lobbyist last July: Kevin McColaugh, who previously worked for NCAA president Charlie Baker when he served as governor of Massachusetts. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA generally allocates between $120,000<\/a> and $140,000 for its internal lobbying activities, a figure that remained the same with McColaugh's inclusion during the third and fourth quarters of 2024.<\/p>\n","post_title":"NCAA boosts Washington lobbying to secure legal shield","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"ncaa-boosts-washington-lobbying-to-secure-legal-shield","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7591","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7583,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content":"\n

Ballard Partners, a lobbying company headed by a leading fundraiser for President Donald Trump<\/a>, has more than tripled its quarterly lobbying gains compared with the exact period a year earlier, as businesses and organizations have sought assistance from a small group of firms allied to the new administration in trying to make sense of a second Trump administration characterized by turmoil and retribution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company will bring in $14 million of lobbying income for the first quarter of 2025, over two times the $6.2 million Ballard saw in the fourth quarter of 2024. Ballard recorded $4.2 million of lobbying income during the first quarter of 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Several of K Street's largest firms are yet to post first quarter revenues as of Monday night's midnight reporting deadline, but Ballard's totals will be right up at the top when the numbers finally appear. Starting a new administration normally is big money for the lobby industry \u2014 and K Street business was red hot before Trump returned to the presidency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to analysis, the company topped the income chart at year-end with $16.9 million in the fourth quarter, followed by runner-up Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, which raked in $14.6 million during the quarter. In the first quarter of 2025, Brownstein's revenue decreased to $16.8 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Florida lobbyist, Brian Ballard, also a longtime, opened a office in Washington for his firm soon after Trump's first White House win in 2017 and quickly became one of the go-to company for corporations and trade groups looking to comprehend the mercurial political newcomer in the White House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While the company has a<\/a> number of Democratic lobbyists on its list, the firm's business suffered under the Biden administration. Nevertheless, it was still in the top 20 of K Street firms, POLITICO's analysis found.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ballard's ascent this year marks a cycle that occurs each time there is a change of power in Washington, as corporate America searches for an angle with an incoming president or congressional chief.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But that rhythm went into overdrive leading up to Trump's second term. Ballard, along with a few other companies with strong connections to the administration, such as Miller Strategies, Mercury Public Affairs, Michael Best Strategies and Continental Strategies, have experienced a wave of new clients since November. Those players did not return requests for their first quarter figures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Ballard has revealed over 130 new lobbying clients since Election Day alone, including JPMorgan Chase, Chevron, Palantir, Netflix, Ripple Labs and the Business Roundtable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company also signed up to lobby on behalf of a number of individuals and organizations targeted for punishment by the Trump administration, including the Harvard University governing board, the Public Broadcasting Service and law organization Kirkland & Ellis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some of Ballard's ex-lobbyists now carry senior positions in Trump's second administration, including Pam Bondi, Attorney General and Susie Wiles, White House chief of staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trent Morse, another Ballard alum, is the deputy director of personnel for Trump. The Florida origins of the firm also result in Ballard having ties to the Floridians who hold sway in Trump's Washington, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Trump fundraiser\u2019s lobbying firm triples earnings mid washington power shift","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trump-fundraisers-lobbying-firm-triples-earnings-mid-washington-power-shift","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7583","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7576,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_content":"\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Auto executives and analysts have said president\u2019s tariffs are more catastrophic for auto parts makers than for the automakers as a whole. The effect might produce a swell impact across the international supply chain, they add.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Automotive officials project a decrease in vehicle sales by millions of units, rising prices for both new and used vehicles, and costs surpassing $100 billion throughout the industry, as indicated by research statements from Wall Street and automotive reviewers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe promote increased manufacturing and additional supply chains within the United States, but it is unfeasible to shift global supply chains overnight or even within months. This process will require time,\u201d <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

states the letter.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Automakers united in lobbying Trump against proposed auto parts tariff","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"automakers-united-in-lobbying-trump-against-proposed-auto-parts-tariff","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 20:21:32","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 20:21:32","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7598","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7591,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content":"\n

The NCAA is strengthening its federal lobbying moves in the beginning of the Trump <\/a>government, expending hundreds of thousands of bucks to control the newly Republican-headed Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The agency disbursed $450,000 on lobbying during 2025's first quarter, nearly doubled the payment it spent during the corresponding period in 2024. The payment is a continuance of the NCAA\u2019s decades-long federal lobbying measure to persuade Congress enact a law that would grant it influence over the amateurism regulations that remain. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Since last year, the NCAA has been trying to persuade Congress to formalize the terms of the House v. NCAA settlement. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe note I obtained when I came [in Washington] was: clean up your own home, and then come converse to us,\u201d <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

NCAA president Charlie Baker commented to reporters during the men\u2019s Final Four. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA views the settlement as evidence that it has taken all possible steps to reform college sports, and now it\u2019s Congress\u2019 responsibility to intervene to safeguard the remaining rules and enable the legal enforcement of additional measures, such as transfer restrictions.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To achieve this, the NCAA seeks antitrust protections, the preemption of state laws regarding NIL (name, image, and likeness), and a clause that stops college athletes from being classified as employees. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last May, the NCAA and conferences defined the compensation plan as a \u201croad map\u201d for Congress. A federal judge is anticipated to issue a ruling on final approval within the next few weeks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"NCAA is instituting positive reforms for student-athletes and responding to different issues in college athletics by mandating health and wellness benefits and guaranteeing scholarships,\" the NCAA SVP for External Affairs added in a statement to Front Office Sports. \"But some of the threats facing college sports can only be addressed by Congress, and the Association is working with student-athletes and their institutions to push for bipartisan legislation.\" Buckley pointed out the NCAA\u2019s challenges in classifying athletes as amateurs and regulating the transfer portal, among other issues, that necessitate congressional support.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA works as a nonprofit, maintaining a permanent headquarters in Indianapolis with multiple workers responsible for executing titles, supporting laws, and certainly, lobbying. However, the NCAA sees itself as a \u201cmember-driven\u201d organization\u2014merely implementing the wishes of the schools it represents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Industry experts indicated that Republicans may have been more open to the NCAA\u2019s requests, which could explain their increased lobbying efforts to pass legislation. Nevertheless, sources have informed FOS that certain House and Senate Republicans oppose at least the NCAA\u2019s requested antitrust exemptions for several reasons, notably a lack of trust in the NCAA. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

From January to March, the NCAA disbursed $90,000 to its established lobbying firm, Brownstein Hyatt, as noted in a quarterly lobbying report submitted on April 18. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA invested $90,000 in lobbying efforts with theGroup DC, a significant player they engaged in January. theGroup DC symbolizes major customers like Pepsico and UnitedHealth Group. The firm\u2019s new client registration form lists three lobbyists: two with Democratic backgrounds and one with experience working for Republicans. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A budget of $270,000 was also allocated to the NCAA's lobbyists. Since 2018, Dawn Buth has been engaged full-time handling government ties. Buth worked independently for several years before the organization hired a second in-house lobbyist last July: Kevin McColaugh, who previously worked for NCAA president Charlie Baker when he served as governor of Massachusetts. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA generally allocates between $120,000<\/a> and $140,000 for its internal lobbying activities, a figure that remained the same with McColaugh's inclusion during the third and fourth quarters of 2024.<\/p>\n","post_title":"NCAA boosts Washington lobbying to secure legal shield","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"ncaa-boosts-washington-lobbying-to-secure-legal-shield","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7591","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7583,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content":"\n

Ballard Partners, a lobbying company headed by a leading fundraiser for President Donald Trump<\/a>, has more than tripled its quarterly lobbying gains compared with the exact period a year earlier, as businesses and organizations have sought assistance from a small group of firms allied to the new administration in trying to make sense of a second Trump administration characterized by turmoil and retribution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company will bring in $14 million of lobbying income for the first quarter of 2025, over two times the $6.2 million Ballard saw in the fourth quarter of 2024. Ballard recorded $4.2 million of lobbying income during the first quarter of 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Several of K Street's largest firms are yet to post first quarter revenues as of Monday night's midnight reporting deadline, but Ballard's totals will be right up at the top when the numbers finally appear. Starting a new administration normally is big money for the lobby industry \u2014 and K Street business was red hot before Trump returned to the presidency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to analysis, the company topped the income chart at year-end with $16.9 million in the fourth quarter, followed by runner-up Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, which raked in $14.6 million during the quarter. In the first quarter of 2025, Brownstein's revenue decreased to $16.8 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Florida lobbyist, Brian Ballard, also a longtime, opened a office in Washington for his firm soon after Trump's first White House win in 2017 and quickly became one of the go-to company for corporations and trade groups looking to comprehend the mercurial political newcomer in the White House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While the company has a<\/a> number of Democratic lobbyists on its list, the firm's business suffered under the Biden administration. Nevertheless, it was still in the top 20 of K Street firms, POLITICO's analysis found.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ballard's ascent this year marks a cycle that occurs each time there is a change of power in Washington, as corporate America searches for an angle with an incoming president or congressional chief.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But that rhythm went into overdrive leading up to Trump's second term. Ballard, along with a few other companies with strong connections to the administration, such as Miller Strategies, Mercury Public Affairs, Michael Best Strategies and Continental Strategies, have experienced a wave of new clients since November. Those players did not return requests for their first quarter figures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Ballard has revealed over 130 new lobbying clients since Election Day alone, including JPMorgan Chase, Chevron, Palantir, Netflix, Ripple Labs and the Business Roundtable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company also signed up to lobby on behalf of a number of individuals and organizations targeted for punishment by the Trump administration, including the Harvard University governing board, the Public Broadcasting Service and law organization Kirkland & Ellis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some of Ballard's ex-lobbyists now carry senior positions in Trump's second administration, including Pam Bondi, Attorney General and Susie Wiles, White House chief of staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trent Morse, another Ballard alum, is the deputy director of personnel for Trump. The Florida origins of the firm also result in Ballard having ties to the Floridians who hold sway in Trump's Washington, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Trump fundraiser\u2019s lobbying firm triples earnings mid washington power shift","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trump-fundraisers-lobbying-firm-triples-earnings-mid-washington-power-shift","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7583","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7576,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_content":"\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

\u201cI\u2019m searching for solutions to assist certain car manufacturers that are transitioning to parts manufactured in Canada, Mexico, and elsewhere. They require some time to begin producing them locally,\u201d Trump stated on April 14. \u201cHowever, they do need some time, so I\u2019m discussing topics like that.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Auto executives and analysts have said president\u2019s tariffs are more catastrophic for auto parts makers than for the automakers as a whole. The effect might produce a swell impact across the international supply chain, they add.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Automotive officials project a decrease in vehicle sales by millions of units, rising prices for both new and used vehicles, and costs surpassing $100 billion throughout the industry, as indicated by research statements from Wall Street and automotive reviewers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe promote increased manufacturing and additional supply chains within the United States, but it is unfeasible to shift global supply chains overnight or even within months. This process will require time,\u201d <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

states the letter.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Automakers united in lobbying Trump against proposed auto parts tariff","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"automakers-united-in-lobbying-trump-against-proposed-auto-parts-tariff","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 20:21:32","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 20:21:32","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7598","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7591,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content":"\n

The NCAA is strengthening its federal lobbying moves in the beginning of the Trump <\/a>government, expending hundreds of thousands of bucks to control the newly Republican-headed Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The agency disbursed $450,000 on lobbying during 2025's first quarter, nearly doubled the payment it spent during the corresponding period in 2024. The payment is a continuance of the NCAA\u2019s decades-long federal lobbying measure to persuade Congress enact a law that would grant it influence over the amateurism regulations that remain. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Since last year, the NCAA has been trying to persuade Congress to formalize the terms of the House v. NCAA settlement. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe note I obtained when I came [in Washington] was: clean up your own home, and then come converse to us,\u201d <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

NCAA president Charlie Baker commented to reporters during the men\u2019s Final Four. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA views the settlement as evidence that it has taken all possible steps to reform college sports, and now it\u2019s Congress\u2019 responsibility to intervene to safeguard the remaining rules and enable the legal enforcement of additional measures, such as transfer restrictions.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To achieve this, the NCAA seeks antitrust protections, the preemption of state laws regarding NIL (name, image, and likeness), and a clause that stops college athletes from being classified as employees. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last May, the NCAA and conferences defined the compensation plan as a \u201croad map\u201d for Congress. A federal judge is anticipated to issue a ruling on final approval within the next few weeks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"NCAA is instituting positive reforms for student-athletes and responding to different issues in college athletics by mandating health and wellness benefits and guaranteeing scholarships,\" the NCAA SVP for External Affairs added in a statement to Front Office Sports. \"But some of the threats facing college sports can only be addressed by Congress, and the Association is working with student-athletes and their institutions to push for bipartisan legislation.\" Buckley pointed out the NCAA\u2019s challenges in classifying athletes as amateurs and regulating the transfer portal, among other issues, that necessitate congressional support.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA works as a nonprofit, maintaining a permanent headquarters in Indianapolis with multiple workers responsible for executing titles, supporting laws, and certainly, lobbying. However, the NCAA sees itself as a \u201cmember-driven\u201d organization\u2014merely implementing the wishes of the schools it represents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Industry experts indicated that Republicans may have been more open to the NCAA\u2019s requests, which could explain their increased lobbying efforts to pass legislation. Nevertheless, sources have informed FOS that certain House and Senate Republicans oppose at least the NCAA\u2019s requested antitrust exemptions for several reasons, notably a lack of trust in the NCAA. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

From January to March, the NCAA disbursed $90,000 to its established lobbying firm, Brownstein Hyatt, as noted in a quarterly lobbying report submitted on April 18. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA invested $90,000 in lobbying efforts with theGroup DC, a significant player they engaged in January. theGroup DC symbolizes major customers like Pepsico and UnitedHealth Group. The firm\u2019s new client registration form lists three lobbyists: two with Democratic backgrounds and one with experience working for Republicans. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A budget of $270,000 was also allocated to the NCAA's lobbyists. Since 2018, Dawn Buth has been engaged full-time handling government ties. Buth worked independently for several years before the organization hired a second in-house lobbyist last July: Kevin McColaugh, who previously worked for NCAA president Charlie Baker when he served as governor of Massachusetts. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA generally allocates between $120,000<\/a> and $140,000 for its internal lobbying activities, a figure that remained the same with McColaugh's inclusion during the third and fourth quarters of 2024.<\/p>\n","post_title":"NCAA boosts Washington lobbying to secure legal shield","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"ncaa-boosts-washington-lobbying-to-secure-legal-shield","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7591","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7583,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content":"\n

Ballard Partners, a lobbying company headed by a leading fundraiser for President Donald Trump<\/a>, has more than tripled its quarterly lobbying gains compared with the exact period a year earlier, as businesses and organizations have sought assistance from a small group of firms allied to the new administration in trying to make sense of a second Trump administration characterized by turmoil and retribution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company will bring in $14 million of lobbying income for the first quarter of 2025, over two times the $6.2 million Ballard saw in the fourth quarter of 2024. Ballard recorded $4.2 million of lobbying income during the first quarter of 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Several of K Street's largest firms are yet to post first quarter revenues as of Monday night's midnight reporting deadline, but Ballard's totals will be right up at the top when the numbers finally appear. Starting a new administration normally is big money for the lobby industry \u2014 and K Street business was red hot before Trump returned to the presidency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to analysis, the company topped the income chart at year-end with $16.9 million in the fourth quarter, followed by runner-up Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, which raked in $14.6 million during the quarter. In the first quarter of 2025, Brownstein's revenue decreased to $16.8 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Florida lobbyist, Brian Ballard, also a longtime, opened a office in Washington for his firm soon after Trump's first White House win in 2017 and quickly became one of the go-to company for corporations and trade groups looking to comprehend the mercurial political newcomer in the White House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While the company has a<\/a> number of Democratic lobbyists on its list, the firm's business suffered under the Biden administration. Nevertheless, it was still in the top 20 of K Street firms, POLITICO's analysis found.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ballard's ascent this year marks a cycle that occurs each time there is a change of power in Washington, as corporate America searches for an angle with an incoming president or congressional chief.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But that rhythm went into overdrive leading up to Trump's second term. Ballard, along with a few other companies with strong connections to the administration, such as Miller Strategies, Mercury Public Affairs, Michael Best Strategies and Continental Strategies, have experienced a wave of new clients since November. Those players did not return requests for their first quarter figures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Ballard has revealed over 130 new lobbying clients since Election Day alone, including JPMorgan Chase, Chevron, Palantir, Netflix, Ripple Labs and the Business Roundtable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company also signed up to lobby on behalf of a number of individuals and organizations targeted for punishment by the Trump administration, including the Harvard University governing board, the Public Broadcasting Service and law organization Kirkland & Ellis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some of Ballard's ex-lobbyists now carry senior positions in Trump's second administration, including Pam Bondi, Attorney General and Susie Wiles, White House chief of staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trent Morse, another Ballard alum, is the deputy director of personnel for Trump. The Florida origins of the firm also result in Ballard having ties to the Floridians who hold sway in Trump's Washington, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Trump fundraiser\u2019s lobbying firm triples earnings mid washington power shift","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trump-fundraisers-lobbying-firm-triples-earnings-mid-washington-power-shift","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7583","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7576,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_content":"\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

The letter follows on the heels of Trump's statement last week that he might allow certain auto manufacturers that require extra time to relocate or boost U.S. car manufacturing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cI\u2019m searching for solutions to assist certain car manufacturers that are transitioning to parts manufactured in Canada, Mexico, and elsewhere. They require some time to begin producing them locally,\u201d Trump stated on April 14. \u201cHowever, they do need some time, so I\u2019m discussing topics like that.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Auto executives and analysts have said president\u2019s tariffs are more catastrophic for auto parts makers than for the automakers as a whole. The effect might produce a swell impact across the international supply chain, they add.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Automotive officials project a decrease in vehicle sales by millions of units, rising prices for both new and used vehicles, and costs surpassing $100 billion throughout the industry, as indicated by research statements from Wall Street and automotive reviewers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe promote increased manufacturing and additional supply chains within the United States, but it is unfeasible to shift global supply chains overnight or even within months. This process will require time,\u201d <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

states the letter.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Automakers united in lobbying Trump against proposed auto parts tariff","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"automakers-united-in-lobbying-trump-against-proposed-auto-parts-tariff","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 20:21:32","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 20:21:32","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7598","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7591,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content":"\n

The NCAA is strengthening its federal lobbying moves in the beginning of the Trump <\/a>government, expending hundreds of thousands of bucks to control the newly Republican-headed Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The agency disbursed $450,000 on lobbying during 2025's first quarter, nearly doubled the payment it spent during the corresponding period in 2024. The payment is a continuance of the NCAA\u2019s decades-long federal lobbying measure to persuade Congress enact a law that would grant it influence over the amateurism regulations that remain. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Since last year, the NCAA has been trying to persuade Congress to formalize the terms of the House v. NCAA settlement. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe note I obtained when I came [in Washington] was: clean up your own home, and then come converse to us,\u201d <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

NCAA president Charlie Baker commented to reporters during the men\u2019s Final Four. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA views the settlement as evidence that it has taken all possible steps to reform college sports, and now it\u2019s Congress\u2019 responsibility to intervene to safeguard the remaining rules and enable the legal enforcement of additional measures, such as transfer restrictions.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To achieve this, the NCAA seeks antitrust protections, the preemption of state laws regarding NIL (name, image, and likeness), and a clause that stops college athletes from being classified as employees. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last May, the NCAA and conferences defined the compensation plan as a \u201croad map\u201d for Congress. A federal judge is anticipated to issue a ruling on final approval within the next few weeks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"NCAA is instituting positive reforms for student-athletes and responding to different issues in college athletics by mandating health and wellness benefits and guaranteeing scholarships,\" the NCAA SVP for External Affairs added in a statement to Front Office Sports. \"But some of the threats facing college sports can only be addressed by Congress, and the Association is working with student-athletes and their institutions to push for bipartisan legislation.\" Buckley pointed out the NCAA\u2019s challenges in classifying athletes as amateurs and regulating the transfer portal, among other issues, that necessitate congressional support.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA works as a nonprofit, maintaining a permanent headquarters in Indianapolis with multiple workers responsible for executing titles, supporting laws, and certainly, lobbying. However, the NCAA sees itself as a \u201cmember-driven\u201d organization\u2014merely implementing the wishes of the schools it represents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Industry experts indicated that Republicans may have been more open to the NCAA\u2019s requests, which could explain their increased lobbying efforts to pass legislation. Nevertheless, sources have informed FOS that certain House and Senate Republicans oppose at least the NCAA\u2019s requested antitrust exemptions for several reasons, notably a lack of trust in the NCAA. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

From January to March, the NCAA disbursed $90,000 to its established lobbying firm, Brownstein Hyatt, as noted in a quarterly lobbying report submitted on April 18. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA invested $90,000 in lobbying efforts with theGroup DC, a significant player they engaged in January. theGroup DC symbolizes major customers like Pepsico and UnitedHealth Group. The firm\u2019s new client registration form lists three lobbyists: two with Democratic backgrounds and one with experience working for Republicans. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A budget of $270,000 was also allocated to the NCAA's lobbyists. Since 2018, Dawn Buth has been engaged full-time handling government ties. Buth worked independently for several years before the organization hired a second in-house lobbyist last July: Kevin McColaugh, who previously worked for NCAA president Charlie Baker when he served as governor of Massachusetts. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA generally allocates between $120,000<\/a> and $140,000 for its internal lobbying activities, a figure that remained the same with McColaugh's inclusion during the third and fourth quarters of 2024.<\/p>\n","post_title":"NCAA boosts Washington lobbying to secure legal shield","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"ncaa-boosts-washington-lobbying-to-secure-legal-shield","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7591","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7583,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content":"\n

Ballard Partners, a lobbying company headed by a leading fundraiser for President Donald Trump<\/a>, has more than tripled its quarterly lobbying gains compared with the exact period a year earlier, as businesses and organizations have sought assistance from a small group of firms allied to the new administration in trying to make sense of a second Trump administration characterized by turmoil and retribution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company will bring in $14 million of lobbying income for the first quarter of 2025, over two times the $6.2 million Ballard saw in the fourth quarter of 2024. Ballard recorded $4.2 million of lobbying income during the first quarter of 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Several of K Street's largest firms are yet to post first quarter revenues as of Monday night's midnight reporting deadline, but Ballard's totals will be right up at the top when the numbers finally appear. Starting a new administration normally is big money for the lobby industry \u2014 and K Street business was red hot before Trump returned to the presidency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to analysis, the company topped the income chart at year-end with $16.9 million in the fourth quarter, followed by runner-up Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, which raked in $14.6 million during the quarter. In the first quarter of 2025, Brownstein's revenue decreased to $16.8 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Florida lobbyist, Brian Ballard, also a longtime, opened a office in Washington for his firm soon after Trump's first White House win in 2017 and quickly became one of the go-to company for corporations and trade groups looking to comprehend the mercurial political newcomer in the White House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While the company has a<\/a> number of Democratic lobbyists on its list, the firm's business suffered under the Biden administration. Nevertheless, it was still in the top 20 of K Street firms, POLITICO's analysis found.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ballard's ascent this year marks a cycle that occurs each time there is a change of power in Washington, as corporate America searches for an angle with an incoming president or congressional chief.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But that rhythm went into overdrive leading up to Trump's second term. Ballard, along with a few other companies with strong connections to the administration, such as Miller Strategies, Mercury Public Affairs, Michael Best Strategies and Continental Strategies, have experienced a wave of new clients since November. Those players did not return requests for their first quarter figures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Ballard has revealed over 130 new lobbying clients since Election Day alone, including JPMorgan Chase, Chevron, Palantir, Netflix, Ripple Labs and the Business Roundtable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company also signed up to lobby on behalf of a number of individuals and organizations targeted for punishment by the Trump administration, including the Harvard University governing board, the Public Broadcasting Service and law organization Kirkland & Ellis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some of Ballard's ex-lobbyists now carry senior positions in Trump's second administration, including Pam Bondi, Attorney General and Susie Wiles, White House chief of staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trent Morse, another Ballard alum, is the deputy director of personnel for Trump. The Florida origins of the firm also result in Ballard having ties to the Floridians who hold sway in Trump's Washington, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Trump fundraiser\u2019s lobbying firm triples earnings mid washington power shift","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trump-fundraisers-lobbying-firm-triples-earnings-mid-washington-power-shift","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7583","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7576,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_content":"\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

\"US President Donald Trump has signaled a willingness to reconsider the policy of imposing 25 percent tariffs on imported auto parts \u2013 the same tariff relief that was recently granted to products such as electronics and semiconductors. A positive development like that would be a welcome relief,\" the letter states. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter follows on the heels of Trump's statement last week that he might allow certain auto manufacturers that require extra time to relocate or boost U.S. car manufacturing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cI\u2019m searching for solutions to assist certain car manufacturers that are transitioning to parts manufactured in Canada, Mexico, and elsewhere. They require some time to begin producing them locally,\u201d Trump stated on April 14. \u201cHowever, they do need some time, so I\u2019m discussing topics like that.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Auto executives and analysts have said president\u2019s tariffs are more catastrophic for auto parts makers than for the automakers as a whole. The effect might produce a swell impact across the international supply chain, they add.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Automotive officials project a decrease in vehicle sales by millions of units, rising prices for both new and used vehicles, and costs surpassing $100 billion throughout the industry, as indicated by research statements from Wall Street and automotive reviewers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe promote increased manufacturing and additional supply chains within the United States, but it is unfeasible to shift global supply chains overnight or even within months. This process will require time,\u201d <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

states the letter.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Automakers united in lobbying Trump against proposed auto parts tariff","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"automakers-united-in-lobbying-trump-against-proposed-auto-parts-tariff","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 20:21:32","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 20:21:32","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7598","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7591,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content":"\n

The NCAA is strengthening its federal lobbying moves in the beginning of the Trump <\/a>government, expending hundreds of thousands of bucks to control the newly Republican-headed Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The agency disbursed $450,000 on lobbying during 2025's first quarter, nearly doubled the payment it spent during the corresponding period in 2024. The payment is a continuance of the NCAA\u2019s decades-long federal lobbying measure to persuade Congress enact a law that would grant it influence over the amateurism regulations that remain. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Since last year, the NCAA has been trying to persuade Congress to formalize the terms of the House v. NCAA settlement. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe note I obtained when I came [in Washington] was: clean up your own home, and then come converse to us,\u201d <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

NCAA president Charlie Baker commented to reporters during the men\u2019s Final Four. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA views the settlement as evidence that it has taken all possible steps to reform college sports, and now it\u2019s Congress\u2019 responsibility to intervene to safeguard the remaining rules and enable the legal enforcement of additional measures, such as transfer restrictions.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To achieve this, the NCAA seeks antitrust protections, the preemption of state laws regarding NIL (name, image, and likeness), and a clause that stops college athletes from being classified as employees. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last May, the NCAA and conferences defined the compensation plan as a \u201croad map\u201d for Congress. A federal judge is anticipated to issue a ruling on final approval within the next few weeks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"NCAA is instituting positive reforms for student-athletes and responding to different issues in college athletics by mandating health and wellness benefits and guaranteeing scholarships,\" the NCAA SVP for External Affairs added in a statement to Front Office Sports. \"But some of the threats facing college sports can only be addressed by Congress, and the Association is working with student-athletes and their institutions to push for bipartisan legislation.\" Buckley pointed out the NCAA\u2019s challenges in classifying athletes as amateurs and regulating the transfer portal, among other issues, that necessitate congressional support.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA works as a nonprofit, maintaining a permanent headquarters in Indianapolis with multiple workers responsible for executing titles, supporting laws, and certainly, lobbying. However, the NCAA sees itself as a \u201cmember-driven\u201d organization\u2014merely implementing the wishes of the schools it represents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Industry experts indicated that Republicans may have been more open to the NCAA\u2019s requests, which could explain their increased lobbying efforts to pass legislation. Nevertheless, sources have informed FOS that certain House and Senate Republicans oppose at least the NCAA\u2019s requested antitrust exemptions for several reasons, notably a lack of trust in the NCAA. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

From January to March, the NCAA disbursed $90,000 to its established lobbying firm, Brownstein Hyatt, as noted in a quarterly lobbying report submitted on April 18. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA invested $90,000 in lobbying efforts with theGroup DC, a significant player they engaged in January. theGroup DC symbolizes major customers like Pepsico and UnitedHealth Group. The firm\u2019s new client registration form lists three lobbyists: two with Democratic backgrounds and one with experience working for Republicans. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A budget of $270,000 was also allocated to the NCAA's lobbyists. Since 2018, Dawn Buth has been engaged full-time handling government ties. Buth worked independently for several years before the organization hired a second in-house lobbyist last July: Kevin McColaugh, who previously worked for NCAA president Charlie Baker when he served as governor of Massachusetts. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA generally allocates between $120,000<\/a> and $140,000 for its internal lobbying activities, a figure that remained the same with McColaugh's inclusion during the third and fourth quarters of 2024.<\/p>\n","post_title":"NCAA boosts Washington lobbying to secure legal shield","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"ncaa-boosts-washington-lobbying-to-secure-legal-shield","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7591","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7583,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content":"\n

Ballard Partners, a lobbying company headed by a leading fundraiser for President Donald Trump<\/a>, has more than tripled its quarterly lobbying gains compared with the exact period a year earlier, as businesses and organizations have sought assistance from a small group of firms allied to the new administration in trying to make sense of a second Trump administration characterized by turmoil and retribution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company will bring in $14 million of lobbying income for the first quarter of 2025, over two times the $6.2 million Ballard saw in the fourth quarter of 2024. Ballard recorded $4.2 million of lobbying income during the first quarter of 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Several of K Street's largest firms are yet to post first quarter revenues as of Monday night's midnight reporting deadline, but Ballard's totals will be right up at the top when the numbers finally appear. Starting a new administration normally is big money for the lobby industry \u2014 and K Street business was red hot before Trump returned to the presidency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to analysis, the company topped the income chart at year-end with $16.9 million in the fourth quarter, followed by runner-up Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, which raked in $14.6 million during the quarter. In the first quarter of 2025, Brownstein's revenue decreased to $16.8 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Florida lobbyist, Brian Ballard, also a longtime, opened a office in Washington for his firm soon after Trump's first White House win in 2017 and quickly became one of the go-to company for corporations and trade groups looking to comprehend the mercurial political newcomer in the White House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While the company has a<\/a> number of Democratic lobbyists on its list, the firm's business suffered under the Biden administration. Nevertheless, it was still in the top 20 of K Street firms, POLITICO's analysis found.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ballard's ascent this year marks a cycle that occurs each time there is a change of power in Washington, as corporate America searches for an angle with an incoming president or congressional chief.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But that rhythm went into overdrive leading up to Trump's second term. Ballard, along with a few other companies with strong connections to the administration, such as Miller Strategies, Mercury Public Affairs, Michael Best Strategies and Continental Strategies, have experienced a wave of new clients since November. Those players did not return requests for their first quarter figures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Ballard has revealed over 130 new lobbying clients since Election Day alone, including JPMorgan Chase, Chevron, Palantir, Netflix, Ripple Labs and the Business Roundtable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company also signed up to lobby on behalf of a number of individuals and organizations targeted for punishment by the Trump administration, including the Harvard University governing board, the Public Broadcasting Service and law organization Kirkland & Ellis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some of Ballard's ex-lobbyists now carry senior positions in Trump's second administration, including Pam Bondi, Attorney General and Susie Wiles, White House chief of staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trent Morse, another Ballard alum, is the deputy director of personnel for Trump. The Florida origins of the firm also result in Ballard having ties to the Floridians who hold sway in Trump's Washington, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Trump fundraiser\u2019s lobbying firm triples earnings mid washington power shift","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trump-fundraisers-lobbying-firm-triples-earnings-mid-washington-power-shift","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7583","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7576,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_content":"\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

The associations claim to speak for the nation's No. 1 manufacturing<\/a> industry with 10 million American employment opportunities in all 50 states and $1.2 trillion injected into the economy annually. Other automakers that are not covered by the groups are electric car manufacturers Rivian Automotive, Tesla, and Lucid Group.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"US President Donald Trump has signaled a willingness to reconsider the policy of imposing 25 percent tariffs on imported auto parts \u2013 the same tariff relief that was recently granted to products such as electronics and semiconductors. A positive development like that would be a welcome relief,\" the letter states. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter follows on the heels of Trump's statement last week that he might allow certain auto manufacturers that require extra time to relocate or boost U.S. car manufacturing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cI\u2019m searching for solutions to assist certain car manufacturers that are transitioning to parts manufactured in Canada, Mexico, and elsewhere. They require some time to begin producing them locally,\u201d Trump stated on April 14. \u201cHowever, they do need some time, so I\u2019m discussing topics like that.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Auto executives and analysts have said president\u2019s tariffs are more catastrophic for auto parts makers than for the automakers as a whole. The effect might produce a swell impact across the international supply chain, they add.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Automotive officials project a decrease in vehicle sales by millions of units, rising prices for both new and used vehicles, and costs surpassing $100 billion throughout the industry, as indicated by research statements from Wall Street and automotive reviewers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe promote increased manufacturing and additional supply chains within the United States, but it is unfeasible to shift global supply chains overnight or even within months. This process will require time,\u201d <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

states the letter.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Automakers united in lobbying Trump against proposed auto parts tariff","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"automakers-united-in-lobbying-trump-against-proposed-auto-parts-tariff","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 20:21:32","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 20:21:32","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7598","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7591,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content":"\n

The NCAA is strengthening its federal lobbying moves in the beginning of the Trump <\/a>government, expending hundreds of thousands of bucks to control the newly Republican-headed Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The agency disbursed $450,000 on lobbying during 2025's first quarter, nearly doubled the payment it spent during the corresponding period in 2024. The payment is a continuance of the NCAA\u2019s decades-long federal lobbying measure to persuade Congress enact a law that would grant it influence over the amateurism regulations that remain. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Since last year, the NCAA has been trying to persuade Congress to formalize the terms of the House v. NCAA settlement. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe note I obtained when I came [in Washington] was: clean up your own home, and then come converse to us,\u201d <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

NCAA president Charlie Baker commented to reporters during the men\u2019s Final Four. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA views the settlement as evidence that it has taken all possible steps to reform college sports, and now it\u2019s Congress\u2019 responsibility to intervene to safeguard the remaining rules and enable the legal enforcement of additional measures, such as transfer restrictions.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To achieve this, the NCAA seeks antitrust protections, the preemption of state laws regarding NIL (name, image, and likeness), and a clause that stops college athletes from being classified as employees. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last May, the NCAA and conferences defined the compensation plan as a \u201croad map\u201d for Congress. A federal judge is anticipated to issue a ruling on final approval within the next few weeks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"NCAA is instituting positive reforms for student-athletes and responding to different issues in college athletics by mandating health and wellness benefits and guaranteeing scholarships,\" the NCAA SVP for External Affairs added in a statement to Front Office Sports. \"But some of the threats facing college sports can only be addressed by Congress, and the Association is working with student-athletes and their institutions to push for bipartisan legislation.\" Buckley pointed out the NCAA\u2019s challenges in classifying athletes as amateurs and regulating the transfer portal, among other issues, that necessitate congressional support.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA works as a nonprofit, maintaining a permanent headquarters in Indianapolis with multiple workers responsible for executing titles, supporting laws, and certainly, lobbying. However, the NCAA sees itself as a \u201cmember-driven\u201d organization\u2014merely implementing the wishes of the schools it represents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Industry experts indicated that Republicans may have been more open to the NCAA\u2019s requests, which could explain their increased lobbying efforts to pass legislation. Nevertheless, sources have informed FOS that certain House and Senate Republicans oppose at least the NCAA\u2019s requested antitrust exemptions for several reasons, notably a lack of trust in the NCAA. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

From January to March, the NCAA disbursed $90,000 to its established lobbying firm, Brownstein Hyatt, as noted in a quarterly lobbying report submitted on April 18. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA invested $90,000 in lobbying efforts with theGroup DC, a significant player they engaged in January. theGroup DC symbolizes major customers like Pepsico and UnitedHealth Group. The firm\u2019s new client registration form lists three lobbyists: two with Democratic backgrounds and one with experience working for Republicans. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A budget of $270,000 was also allocated to the NCAA's lobbyists. Since 2018, Dawn Buth has been engaged full-time handling government ties. Buth worked independently for several years before the organization hired a second in-house lobbyist last July: Kevin McColaugh, who previously worked for NCAA president Charlie Baker when he served as governor of Massachusetts. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA generally allocates between $120,000<\/a> and $140,000 for its internal lobbying activities, a figure that remained the same with McColaugh's inclusion during the third and fourth quarters of 2024.<\/p>\n","post_title":"NCAA boosts Washington lobbying to secure legal shield","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"ncaa-boosts-washington-lobbying-to-secure-legal-shield","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7591","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7583,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content":"\n

Ballard Partners, a lobbying company headed by a leading fundraiser for President Donald Trump<\/a>, has more than tripled its quarterly lobbying gains compared with the exact period a year earlier, as businesses and organizations have sought assistance from a small group of firms allied to the new administration in trying to make sense of a second Trump administration characterized by turmoil and retribution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company will bring in $14 million of lobbying income for the first quarter of 2025, over two times the $6.2 million Ballard saw in the fourth quarter of 2024. Ballard recorded $4.2 million of lobbying income during the first quarter of 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Several of K Street's largest firms are yet to post first quarter revenues as of Monday night's midnight reporting deadline, but Ballard's totals will be right up at the top when the numbers finally appear. Starting a new administration normally is big money for the lobby industry \u2014 and K Street business was red hot before Trump returned to the presidency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to analysis, the company topped the income chart at year-end with $16.9 million in the fourth quarter, followed by runner-up Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, which raked in $14.6 million during the quarter. In the first quarter of 2025, Brownstein's revenue decreased to $16.8 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Florida lobbyist, Brian Ballard, also a longtime, opened a office in Washington for his firm soon after Trump's first White House win in 2017 and quickly became one of the go-to company for corporations and trade groups looking to comprehend the mercurial political newcomer in the White House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While the company has a<\/a> number of Democratic lobbyists on its list, the firm's business suffered under the Biden administration. Nevertheless, it was still in the top 20 of K Street firms, POLITICO's analysis found.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ballard's ascent this year marks a cycle that occurs each time there is a change of power in Washington, as corporate America searches for an angle with an incoming president or congressional chief.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But that rhythm went into overdrive leading up to Trump's second term. Ballard, along with a few other companies with strong connections to the administration, such as Miller Strategies, Mercury Public Affairs, Michael Best Strategies and Continental Strategies, have experienced a wave of new clients since November. Those players did not return requests for their first quarter figures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Ballard has revealed over 130 new lobbying clients since Election Day alone, including JPMorgan Chase, Chevron, Palantir, Netflix, Ripple Labs and the Business Roundtable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company also signed up to lobby on behalf of a number of individuals and organizations targeted for punishment by the Trump administration, including the Harvard University governing board, the Public Broadcasting Service and law organization Kirkland & Ellis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some of Ballard's ex-lobbyists now carry senior positions in Trump's second administration, including Pam Bondi, Attorney General and Susie Wiles, White House chief of staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trent Morse, another Ballard alum, is the deputy director of personnel for Trump. The Florida origins of the firm also result in Ballard having ties to the Floridians who hold sway in Trump's Washington, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Trump fundraiser\u2019s lobbying firm triples earnings mid washington power shift","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trump-fundraisers-lobbying-firm-triples-earnings-mid-washington-power-shift","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7583","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7576,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_content":"\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

The joint letter is unusual, if not historic, for the auto business. Such companies seldom, if ever, endorse a collective position.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The associations claim to speak for the nation's No. 1 manufacturing<\/a> industry with 10 million American employment opportunities in all 50 states and $1.2 trillion injected into the economy annually. Other automakers that are not covered by the groups are electric car manufacturers Rivian Automotive, Tesla, and Lucid Group.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"US President Donald Trump has signaled a willingness to reconsider the policy of imposing 25 percent tariffs on imported auto parts \u2013 the same tariff relief that was recently granted to products such as electronics and semiconductors. A positive development like that would be a welcome relief,\" the letter states. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter follows on the heels of Trump's statement last week that he might allow certain auto manufacturers that require extra time to relocate or boost U.S. car manufacturing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cI\u2019m searching for solutions to assist certain car manufacturers that are transitioning to parts manufactured in Canada, Mexico, and elsewhere. They require some time to begin producing them locally,\u201d Trump stated on April 14. \u201cHowever, they do need some time, so I\u2019m discussing topics like that.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Auto executives and analysts have said president\u2019s tariffs are more catastrophic for auto parts makers than for the automakers as a whole. The effect might produce a swell impact across the international supply chain, they add.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Automotive officials project a decrease in vehicle sales by millions of units, rising prices for both new and used vehicles, and costs surpassing $100 billion throughout the industry, as indicated by research statements from Wall Street and automotive reviewers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe promote increased manufacturing and additional supply chains within the United States, but it is unfeasible to shift global supply chains overnight or even within months. This process will require time,\u201d <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

states the letter.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Automakers united in lobbying Trump against proposed auto parts tariff","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"automakers-united-in-lobbying-trump-against-proposed-auto-parts-tariff","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 20:21:32","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 20:21:32","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7598","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7591,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content":"\n

The NCAA is strengthening its federal lobbying moves in the beginning of the Trump <\/a>government, expending hundreds of thousands of bucks to control the newly Republican-headed Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The agency disbursed $450,000 on lobbying during 2025's first quarter, nearly doubled the payment it spent during the corresponding period in 2024. The payment is a continuance of the NCAA\u2019s decades-long federal lobbying measure to persuade Congress enact a law that would grant it influence over the amateurism regulations that remain. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Since last year, the NCAA has been trying to persuade Congress to formalize the terms of the House v. NCAA settlement. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe note I obtained when I came [in Washington] was: clean up your own home, and then come converse to us,\u201d <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

NCAA president Charlie Baker commented to reporters during the men\u2019s Final Four. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA views the settlement as evidence that it has taken all possible steps to reform college sports, and now it\u2019s Congress\u2019 responsibility to intervene to safeguard the remaining rules and enable the legal enforcement of additional measures, such as transfer restrictions.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To achieve this, the NCAA seeks antitrust protections, the preemption of state laws regarding NIL (name, image, and likeness), and a clause that stops college athletes from being classified as employees. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last May, the NCAA and conferences defined the compensation plan as a \u201croad map\u201d for Congress. A federal judge is anticipated to issue a ruling on final approval within the next few weeks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"NCAA is instituting positive reforms for student-athletes and responding to different issues in college athletics by mandating health and wellness benefits and guaranteeing scholarships,\" the NCAA SVP for External Affairs added in a statement to Front Office Sports. \"But some of the threats facing college sports can only be addressed by Congress, and the Association is working with student-athletes and their institutions to push for bipartisan legislation.\" Buckley pointed out the NCAA\u2019s challenges in classifying athletes as amateurs and regulating the transfer portal, among other issues, that necessitate congressional support.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA works as a nonprofit, maintaining a permanent headquarters in Indianapolis with multiple workers responsible for executing titles, supporting laws, and certainly, lobbying. However, the NCAA sees itself as a \u201cmember-driven\u201d organization\u2014merely implementing the wishes of the schools it represents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Industry experts indicated that Republicans may have been more open to the NCAA\u2019s requests, which could explain their increased lobbying efforts to pass legislation. Nevertheless, sources have informed FOS that certain House and Senate Republicans oppose at least the NCAA\u2019s requested antitrust exemptions for several reasons, notably a lack of trust in the NCAA. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

From January to March, the NCAA disbursed $90,000 to its established lobbying firm, Brownstein Hyatt, as noted in a quarterly lobbying report submitted on April 18. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA invested $90,000 in lobbying efforts with theGroup DC, a significant player they engaged in January. theGroup DC symbolizes major customers like Pepsico and UnitedHealth Group. The firm\u2019s new client registration form lists three lobbyists: two with Democratic backgrounds and one with experience working for Republicans. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A budget of $270,000 was also allocated to the NCAA's lobbyists. Since 2018, Dawn Buth has been engaged full-time handling government ties. Buth worked independently for several years before the organization hired a second in-house lobbyist last July: Kevin McColaugh, who previously worked for NCAA president Charlie Baker when he served as governor of Massachusetts. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA generally allocates between $120,000<\/a> and $140,000 for its internal lobbying activities, a figure that remained the same with McColaugh's inclusion during the third and fourth quarters of 2024.<\/p>\n","post_title":"NCAA boosts Washington lobbying to secure legal shield","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"ncaa-boosts-washington-lobbying-to-secure-legal-shield","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7591","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7583,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content":"\n

Ballard Partners, a lobbying company headed by a leading fundraiser for President Donald Trump<\/a>, has more than tripled its quarterly lobbying gains compared with the exact period a year earlier, as businesses and organizations have sought assistance from a small group of firms allied to the new administration in trying to make sense of a second Trump administration characterized by turmoil and retribution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company will bring in $14 million of lobbying income for the first quarter of 2025, over two times the $6.2 million Ballard saw in the fourth quarter of 2024. Ballard recorded $4.2 million of lobbying income during the first quarter of 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Several of K Street's largest firms are yet to post first quarter revenues as of Monday night's midnight reporting deadline, but Ballard's totals will be right up at the top when the numbers finally appear. Starting a new administration normally is big money for the lobby industry \u2014 and K Street business was red hot before Trump returned to the presidency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to analysis, the company topped the income chart at year-end with $16.9 million in the fourth quarter, followed by runner-up Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, which raked in $14.6 million during the quarter. In the first quarter of 2025, Brownstein's revenue decreased to $16.8 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Florida lobbyist, Brian Ballard, also a longtime, opened a office in Washington for his firm soon after Trump's first White House win in 2017 and quickly became one of the go-to company for corporations and trade groups looking to comprehend the mercurial political newcomer in the White House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While the company has a<\/a> number of Democratic lobbyists on its list, the firm's business suffered under the Biden administration. Nevertheless, it was still in the top 20 of K Street firms, POLITICO's analysis found.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ballard's ascent this year marks a cycle that occurs each time there is a change of power in Washington, as corporate America searches for an angle with an incoming president or congressional chief.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But that rhythm went into overdrive leading up to Trump's second term. Ballard, along with a few other companies with strong connections to the administration, such as Miller Strategies, Mercury Public Affairs, Michael Best Strategies and Continental Strategies, have experienced a wave of new clients since November. Those players did not return requests for their first quarter figures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Ballard has revealed over 130 new lobbying clients since Election Day alone, including JPMorgan Chase, Chevron, Palantir, Netflix, Ripple Labs and the Business Roundtable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company also signed up to lobby on behalf of a number of individuals and organizations targeted for punishment by the Trump administration, including the Harvard University governing board, the Public Broadcasting Service and law organization Kirkland & Ellis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some of Ballard's ex-lobbyists now carry senior positions in Trump's second administration, including Pam Bondi, Attorney General and Susie Wiles, White House chief of staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trent Morse, another Ballard alum, is the deputy director of personnel for Trump. The Florida origins of the firm also result in Ballard having ties to the Floridians who hold sway in Trump's Washington, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Trump fundraiser\u2019s lobbying firm triples earnings mid washington power shift","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trump-fundraisers-lobbying-firm-triples-earnings-mid-washington-power-shift","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7583","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7576,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_content":"\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

It is inked by leaders of American International Automobile Dealers Association, National Automobile Dealers Association, Autos Drive America, Alliance for Automotive Innovation, vehicle suppliers' association MEMA, and American Automotive Policy Council heads.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The joint letter is unusual, if not historic, for the auto business. Such companies seldom, if ever, endorse a collective position.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The associations claim to speak for the nation's No. 1 manufacturing<\/a> industry with 10 million American employment opportunities in all 50 states and $1.2 trillion injected into the economy annually. Other automakers that are not covered by the groups are electric car manufacturers Rivian Automotive, Tesla, and Lucid Group.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"US President Donald Trump has signaled a willingness to reconsider the policy of imposing 25 percent tariffs on imported auto parts \u2013 the same tariff relief that was recently granted to products such as electronics and semiconductors. A positive development like that would be a welcome relief,\" the letter states. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter follows on the heels of Trump's statement last week that he might allow certain auto manufacturers that require extra time to relocate or boost U.S. car manufacturing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cI\u2019m searching for solutions to assist certain car manufacturers that are transitioning to parts manufactured in Canada, Mexico, and elsewhere. They require some time to begin producing them locally,\u201d Trump stated on April 14. \u201cHowever, they do need some time, so I\u2019m discussing topics like that.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Auto executives and analysts have said president\u2019s tariffs are more catastrophic for auto parts makers than for the automakers as a whole. The effect might produce a swell impact across the international supply chain, they add.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Automotive officials project a decrease in vehicle sales by millions of units, rising prices for both new and used vehicles, and costs surpassing $100 billion throughout the industry, as indicated by research statements from Wall Street and automotive reviewers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe promote increased manufacturing and additional supply chains within the United States, but it is unfeasible to shift global supply chains overnight or even within months. This process will require time,\u201d <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

states the letter.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Automakers united in lobbying Trump against proposed auto parts tariff","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"automakers-united-in-lobbying-trump-against-proposed-auto-parts-tariff","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 20:21:32","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 20:21:32","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7598","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7591,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content":"\n

The NCAA is strengthening its federal lobbying moves in the beginning of the Trump <\/a>government, expending hundreds of thousands of bucks to control the newly Republican-headed Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The agency disbursed $450,000 on lobbying during 2025's first quarter, nearly doubled the payment it spent during the corresponding period in 2024. The payment is a continuance of the NCAA\u2019s decades-long federal lobbying measure to persuade Congress enact a law that would grant it influence over the amateurism regulations that remain. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Since last year, the NCAA has been trying to persuade Congress to formalize the terms of the House v. NCAA settlement. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe note I obtained when I came [in Washington] was: clean up your own home, and then come converse to us,\u201d <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

NCAA president Charlie Baker commented to reporters during the men\u2019s Final Four. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA views the settlement as evidence that it has taken all possible steps to reform college sports, and now it\u2019s Congress\u2019 responsibility to intervene to safeguard the remaining rules and enable the legal enforcement of additional measures, such as transfer restrictions.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To achieve this, the NCAA seeks antitrust protections, the preemption of state laws regarding NIL (name, image, and likeness), and a clause that stops college athletes from being classified as employees. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last May, the NCAA and conferences defined the compensation plan as a \u201croad map\u201d for Congress. A federal judge is anticipated to issue a ruling on final approval within the next few weeks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"NCAA is instituting positive reforms for student-athletes and responding to different issues in college athletics by mandating health and wellness benefits and guaranteeing scholarships,\" the NCAA SVP for External Affairs added in a statement to Front Office Sports. \"But some of the threats facing college sports can only be addressed by Congress, and the Association is working with student-athletes and their institutions to push for bipartisan legislation.\" Buckley pointed out the NCAA\u2019s challenges in classifying athletes as amateurs and regulating the transfer portal, among other issues, that necessitate congressional support.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA works as a nonprofit, maintaining a permanent headquarters in Indianapolis with multiple workers responsible for executing titles, supporting laws, and certainly, lobbying. However, the NCAA sees itself as a \u201cmember-driven\u201d organization\u2014merely implementing the wishes of the schools it represents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Industry experts indicated that Republicans may have been more open to the NCAA\u2019s requests, which could explain their increased lobbying efforts to pass legislation. Nevertheless, sources have informed FOS that certain House and Senate Republicans oppose at least the NCAA\u2019s requested antitrust exemptions for several reasons, notably a lack of trust in the NCAA. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

From January to March, the NCAA disbursed $90,000 to its established lobbying firm, Brownstein Hyatt, as noted in a quarterly lobbying report submitted on April 18. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA invested $90,000 in lobbying efforts with theGroup DC, a significant player they engaged in January. theGroup DC symbolizes major customers like Pepsico and UnitedHealth Group. The firm\u2019s new client registration form lists three lobbyists: two with Democratic backgrounds and one with experience working for Republicans. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A budget of $270,000 was also allocated to the NCAA's lobbyists. Since 2018, Dawn Buth has been engaged full-time handling government ties. Buth worked independently for several years before the organization hired a second in-house lobbyist last July: Kevin McColaugh, who previously worked for NCAA president Charlie Baker when he served as governor of Massachusetts. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA generally allocates between $120,000<\/a> and $140,000 for its internal lobbying activities, a figure that remained the same with McColaugh's inclusion during the third and fourth quarters of 2024.<\/p>\n","post_title":"NCAA boosts Washington lobbying to secure legal shield","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"ncaa-boosts-washington-lobbying-to-secure-legal-shield","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7591","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7583,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content":"\n

Ballard Partners, a lobbying company headed by a leading fundraiser for President Donald Trump<\/a>, has more than tripled its quarterly lobbying gains compared with the exact period a year earlier, as businesses and organizations have sought assistance from a small group of firms allied to the new administration in trying to make sense of a second Trump administration characterized by turmoil and retribution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company will bring in $14 million of lobbying income for the first quarter of 2025, over two times the $6.2 million Ballard saw in the fourth quarter of 2024. Ballard recorded $4.2 million of lobbying income during the first quarter of 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Several of K Street's largest firms are yet to post first quarter revenues as of Monday night's midnight reporting deadline, but Ballard's totals will be right up at the top when the numbers finally appear. Starting a new administration normally is big money for the lobby industry \u2014 and K Street business was red hot before Trump returned to the presidency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to analysis, the company topped the income chart at year-end with $16.9 million in the fourth quarter, followed by runner-up Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, which raked in $14.6 million during the quarter. In the first quarter of 2025, Brownstein's revenue decreased to $16.8 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Florida lobbyist, Brian Ballard, also a longtime, opened a office in Washington for his firm soon after Trump's first White House win in 2017 and quickly became one of the go-to company for corporations and trade groups looking to comprehend the mercurial political newcomer in the White House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While the company has a<\/a> number of Democratic lobbyists on its list, the firm's business suffered under the Biden administration. Nevertheless, it was still in the top 20 of K Street firms, POLITICO's analysis found.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ballard's ascent this year marks a cycle that occurs each time there is a change of power in Washington, as corporate America searches for an angle with an incoming president or congressional chief.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But that rhythm went into overdrive leading up to Trump's second term. Ballard, along with a few other companies with strong connections to the administration, such as Miller Strategies, Mercury Public Affairs, Michael Best Strategies and Continental Strategies, have experienced a wave of new clients since November. Those players did not return requests for their first quarter figures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Ballard has revealed over 130 new lobbying clients since Election Day alone, including JPMorgan Chase, Chevron, Palantir, Netflix, Ripple Labs and the Business Roundtable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company also signed up to lobby on behalf of a number of individuals and organizations targeted for punishment by the Trump administration, including the Harvard University governing board, the Public Broadcasting Service and law organization Kirkland & Ellis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some of Ballard's ex-lobbyists now carry senior positions in Trump's second administration, including Pam Bondi, Attorney General and Susie Wiles, White House chief of staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trent Morse, another Ballard alum, is the deputy director of personnel for Trump. The Florida origins of the firm also result in Ballard having ties to the Floridians who hold sway in Trump's Washington, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Trump fundraiser\u2019s lobbying firm triples earnings mid washington power shift","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trump-fundraisers-lobbying-firm-triples-earnings-mid-washington-power-shift","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7583","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7576,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_content":"\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

The statement, signed on April 21, is directed at U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, U.S. Department of Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and U.S. Trade Representative Ambassador Jamieson Greer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is inked by leaders of American International Automobile Dealers Association, National Automobile Dealers Association, Autos Drive America, Alliance for Automotive Innovation, vehicle suppliers' association MEMA, and American Automotive Policy Council heads.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The joint letter is unusual, if not historic, for the auto business. Such companies seldom, if ever, endorse a collective position.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The associations claim to speak for the nation's No. 1 manufacturing<\/a> industry with 10 million American employment opportunities in all 50 states and $1.2 trillion injected into the economy annually. Other automakers that are not covered by the groups are electric car manufacturers Rivian Automotive, Tesla, and Lucid Group.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"US President Donald Trump has signaled a willingness to reconsider the policy of imposing 25 percent tariffs on imported auto parts \u2013 the same tariff relief that was recently granted to products such as electronics and semiconductors. A positive development like that would be a welcome relief,\" the letter states. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter follows on the heels of Trump's statement last week that he might allow certain auto manufacturers that require extra time to relocate or boost U.S. car manufacturing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cI\u2019m searching for solutions to assist certain car manufacturers that are transitioning to parts manufactured in Canada, Mexico, and elsewhere. They require some time to begin producing them locally,\u201d Trump stated on April 14. \u201cHowever, they do need some time, so I\u2019m discussing topics like that.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Auto executives and analysts have said president\u2019s tariffs are more catastrophic for auto parts makers than for the automakers as a whole. The effect might produce a swell impact across the international supply chain, they add.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Automotive officials project a decrease in vehicle sales by millions of units, rising prices for both new and used vehicles, and costs surpassing $100 billion throughout the industry, as indicated by research statements from Wall Street and automotive reviewers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe promote increased manufacturing and additional supply chains within the United States, but it is unfeasible to shift global supply chains overnight or even within months. This process will require time,\u201d <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

states the letter.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Automakers united in lobbying Trump against proposed auto parts tariff","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"automakers-united-in-lobbying-trump-against-proposed-auto-parts-tariff","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 20:21:32","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 20:21:32","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7598","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7591,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content":"\n

The NCAA is strengthening its federal lobbying moves in the beginning of the Trump <\/a>government, expending hundreds of thousands of bucks to control the newly Republican-headed Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The agency disbursed $450,000 on lobbying during 2025's first quarter, nearly doubled the payment it spent during the corresponding period in 2024. The payment is a continuance of the NCAA\u2019s decades-long federal lobbying measure to persuade Congress enact a law that would grant it influence over the amateurism regulations that remain. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Since last year, the NCAA has been trying to persuade Congress to formalize the terms of the House v. NCAA settlement. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe note I obtained when I came [in Washington] was: clean up your own home, and then come converse to us,\u201d <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

NCAA president Charlie Baker commented to reporters during the men\u2019s Final Four. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA views the settlement as evidence that it has taken all possible steps to reform college sports, and now it\u2019s Congress\u2019 responsibility to intervene to safeguard the remaining rules and enable the legal enforcement of additional measures, such as transfer restrictions.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To achieve this, the NCAA seeks antitrust protections, the preemption of state laws regarding NIL (name, image, and likeness), and a clause that stops college athletes from being classified as employees. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last May, the NCAA and conferences defined the compensation plan as a \u201croad map\u201d for Congress. A federal judge is anticipated to issue a ruling on final approval within the next few weeks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"NCAA is instituting positive reforms for student-athletes and responding to different issues in college athletics by mandating health and wellness benefits and guaranteeing scholarships,\" the NCAA SVP for External Affairs added in a statement to Front Office Sports. \"But some of the threats facing college sports can only be addressed by Congress, and the Association is working with student-athletes and their institutions to push for bipartisan legislation.\" Buckley pointed out the NCAA\u2019s challenges in classifying athletes as amateurs and regulating the transfer portal, among other issues, that necessitate congressional support.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA works as a nonprofit, maintaining a permanent headquarters in Indianapolis with multiple workers responsible for executing titles, supporting laws, and certainly, lobbying. However, the NCAA sees itself as a \u201cmember-driven\u201d organization\u2014merely implementing the wishes of the schools it represents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Industry experts indicated that Republicans may have been more open to the NCAA\u2019s requests, which could explain their increased lobbying efforts to pass legislation. Nevertheless, sources have informed FOS that certain House and Senate Republicans oppose at least the NCAA\u2019s requested antitrust exemptions for several reasons, notably a lack of trust in the NCAA. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

From January to March, the NCAA disbursed $90,000 to its established lobbying firm, Brownstein Hyatt, as noted in a quarterly lobbying report submitted on April 18. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA invested $90,000 in lobbying efforts with theGroup DC, a significant player they engaged in January. theGroup DC symbolizes major customers like Pepsico and UnitedHealth Group. The firm\u2019s new client registration form lists three lobbyists: two with Democratic backgrounds and one with experience working for Republicans. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A budget of $270,000 was also allocated to the NCAA's lobbyists. Since 2018, Dawn Buth has been engaged full-time handling government ties. Buth worked independently for several years before the organization hired a second in-house lobbyist last July: Kevin McColaugh, who previously worked for NCAA president Charlie Baker when he served as governor of Massachusetts. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA generally allocates between $120,000<\/a> and $140,000 for its internal lobbying activities, a figure that remained the same with McColaugh's inclusion during the third and fourth quarters of 2024.<\/p>\n","post_title":"NCAA boosts Washington lobbying to secure legal shield","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"ncaa-boosts-washington-lobbying-to-secure-legal-shield","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7591","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7583,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content":"\n

Ballard Partners, a lobbying company headed by a leading fundraiser for President Donald Trump<\/a>, has more than tripled its quarterly lobbying gains compared with the exact period a year earlier, as businesses and organizations have sought assistance from a small group of firms allied to the new administration in trying to make sense of a second Trump administration characterized by turmoil and retribution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company will bring in $14 million of lobbying income for the first quarter of 2025, over two times the $6.2 million Ballard saw in the fourth quarter of 2024. Ballard recorded $4.2 million of lobbying income during the first quarter of 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Several of K Street's largest firms are yet to post first quarter revenues as of Monday night's midnight reporting deadline, but Ballard's totals will be right up at the top when the numbers finally appear. Starting a new administration normally is big money for the lobby industry \u2014 and K Street business was red hot before Trump returned to the presidency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to analysis, the company topped the income chart at year-end with $16.9 million in the fourth quarter, followed by runner-up Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, which raked in $14.6 million during the quarter. In the first quarter of 2025, Brownstein's revenue decreased to $16.8 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Florida lobbyist, Brian Ballard, also a longtime, opened a office in Washington for his firm soon after Trump's first White House win in 2017 and quickly became one of the go-to company for corporations and trade groups looking to comprehend the mercurial political newcomer in the White House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While the company has a<\/a> number of Democratic lobbyists on its list, the firm's business suffered under the Biden administration. Nevertheless, it was still in the top 20 of K Street firms, POLITICO's analysis found.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ballard's ascent this year marks a cycle that occurs each time there is a change of power in Washington, as corporate America searches for an angle with an incoming president or congressional chief.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But that rhythm went into overdrive leading up to Trump's second term. Ballard, along with a few other companies with strong connections to the administration, such as Miller Strategies, Mercury Public Affairs, Michael Best Strategies and Continental Strategies, have experienced a wave of new clients since November. Those players did not return requests for their first quarter figures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Ballard has revealed over 130 new lobbying clients since Election Day alone, including JPMorgan Chase, Chevron, Palantir, Netflix, Ripple Labs and the Business Roundtable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company also signed up to lobby on behalf of a number of individuals and organizations targeted for punishment by the Trump administration, including the Harvard University governing board, the Public Broadcasting Service and law organization Kirkland & Ellis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some of Ballard's ex-lobbyists now carry senior positions in Trump's second administration, including Pam Bondi, Attorney General and Susie Wiles, White House chief of staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trent Morse, another Ballard alum, is the deputy director of personnel for Trump. The Florida origins of the firm also result in Ballard having ties to the Floridians who hold sway in Trump's Washington, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Trump fundraiser\u2019s lobbying firm triples earnings mid washington power shift","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trump-fundraisers-lobbying-firm-triples-earnings-mid-washington-power-shift","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7583","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7576,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_content":"\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

\"It takes only the collapse of one supplier to cause the suspension of an automaker's production line. Whenever it occurs, as happened during the pandemic, all the suppliers are affected, and the employees will be out of their careers.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The statement, signed on April 21, is directed at U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, U.S. Department of Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and U.S. Trade Representative Ambassador Jamieson Greer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is inked by leaders of American International Automobile Dealers Association, National Automobile Dealers Association, Autos Drive America, Alliance for Automotive Innovation, vehicle suppliers' association MEMA, and American Automotive Policy Council heads.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The joint letter is unusual, if not historic, for the auto business. Such companies seldom, if ever, endorse a collective position.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The associations claim to speak for the nation's No. 1 manufacturing<\/a> industry with 10 million American employment opportunities in all 50 states and $1.2 trillion injected into the economy annually. Other automakers that are not covered by the groups are electric car manufacturers Rivian Automotive, Tesla, and Lucid Group.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"US President Donald Trump has signaled a willingness to reconsider the policy of imposing 25 percent tariffs on imported auto parts \u2013 the same tariff relief that was recently granted to products such as electronics and semiconductors. A positive development like that would be a welcome relief,\" the letter states. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter follows on the heels of Trump's statement last week that he might allow certain auto manufacturers that require extra time to relocate or boost U.S. car manufacturing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cI\u2019m searching for solutions to assist certain car manufacturers that are transitioning to parts manufactured in Canada, Mexico, and elsewhere. They require some time to begin producing them locally,\u201d Trump stated on April 14. \u201cHowever, they do need some time, so I\u2019m discussing topics like that.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Auto executives and analysts have said president\u2019s tariffs are more catastrophic for auto parts makers than for the automakers as a whole. The effect might produce a swell impact across the international supply chain, they add.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Automotive officials project a decrease in vehicle sales by millions of units, rising prices for both new and used vehicles, and costs surpassing $100 billion throughout the industry, as indicated by research statements from Wall Street and automotive reviewers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe promote increased manufacturing and additional supply chains within the United States, but it is unfeasible to shift global supply chains overnight or even within months. This process will require time,\u201d <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

states the letter.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Automakers united in lobbying Trump against proposed auto parts tariff","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"automakers-united-in-lobbying-trump-against-proposed-auto-parts-tariff","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 20:21:32","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 20:21:32","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7598","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7591,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content":"\n

The NCAA is strengthening its federal lobbying moves in the beginning of the Trump <\/a>government, expending hundreds of thousands of bucks to control the newly Republican-headed Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The agency disbursed $450,000 on lobbying during 2025's first quarter, nearly doubled the payment it spent during the corresponding period in 2024. The payment is a continuance of the NCAA\u2019s decades-long federal lobbying measure to persuade Congress enact a law that would grant it influence over the amateurism regulations that remain. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Since last year, the NCAA has been trying to persuade Congress to formalize the terms of the House v. NCAA settlement. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe note I obtained when I came [in Washington] was: clean up your own home, and then come converse to us,\u201d <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

NCAA president Charlie Baker commented to reporters during the men\u2019s Final Four. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA views the settlement as evidence that it has taken all possible steps to reform college sports, and now it\u2019s Congress\u2019 responsibility to intervene to safeguard the remaining rules and enable the legal enforcement of additional measures, such as transfer restrictions.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To achieve this, the NCAA seeks antitrust protections, the preemption of state laws regarding NIL (name, image, and likeness), and a clause that stops college athletes from being classified as employees. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last May, the NCAA and conferences defined the compensation plan as a \u201croad map\u201d for Congress. A federal judge is anticipated to issue a ruling on final approval within the next few weeks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"NCAA is instituting positive reforms for student-athletes and responding to different issues in college athletics by mandating health and wellness benefits and guaranteeing scholarships,\" the NCAA SVP for External Affairs added in a statement to Front Office Sports. \"But some of the threats facing college sports can only be addressed by Congress, and the Association is working with student-athletes and their institutions to push for bipartisan legislation.\" Buckley pointed out the NCAA\u2019s challenges in classifying athletes as amateurs and regulating the transfer portal, among other issues, that necessitate congressional support.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA works as a nonprofit, maintaining a permanent headquarters in Indianapolis with multiple workers responsible for executing titles, supporting laws, and certainly, lobbying. However, the NCAA sees itself as a \u201cmember-driven\u201d organization\u2014merely implementing the wishes of the schools it represents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Industry experts indicated that Republicans may have been more open to the NCAA\u2019s requests, which could explain their increased lobbying efforts to pass legislation. Nevertheless, sources have informed FOS that certain House and Senate Republicans oppose at least the NCAA\u2019s requested antitrust exemptions for several reasons, notably a lack of trust in the NCAA. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

From January to March, the NCAA disbursed $90,000 to its established lobbying firm, Brownstein Hyatt, as noted in a quarterly lobbying report submitted on April 18. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA invested $90,000 in lobbying efforts with theGroup DC, a significant player they engaged in January. theGroup DC symbolizes major customers like Pepsico and UnitedHealth Group. The firm\u2019s new client registration form lists three lobbyists: two with Democratic backgrounds and one with experience working for Republicans. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A budget of $270,000 was also allocated to the NCAA's lobbyists. Since 2018, Dawn Buth has been engaged full-time handling government ties. Buth worked independently for several years before the organization hired a second in-house lobbyist last July: Kevin McColaugh, who previously worked for NCAA president Charlie Baker when he served as governor of Massachusetts. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA generally allocates between $120,000<\/a> and $140,000 for its internal lobbying activities, a figure that remained the same with McColaugh's inclusion during the third and fourth quarters of 2024.<\/p>\n","post_title":"NCAA boosts Washington lobbying to secure legal shield","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"ncaa-boosts-washington-lobbying-to-secure-legal-shield","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7591","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7583,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content":"\n

Ballard Partners, a lobbying company headed by a leading fundraiser for President Donald Trump<\/a>, has more than tripled its quarterly lobbying gains compared with the exact period a year earlier, as businesses and organizations have sought assistance from a small group of firms allied to the new administration in trying to make sense of a second Trump administration characterized by turmoil and retribution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company will bring in $14 million of lobbying income for the first quarter of 2025, over two times the $6.2 million Ballard saw in the fourth quarter of 2024. Ballard recorded $4.2 million of lobbying income during the first quarter of 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Several of K Street's largest firms are yet to post first quarter revenues as of Monday night's midnight reporting deadline, but Ballard's totals will be right up at the top when the numbers finally appear. Starting a new administration normally is big money for the lobby industry \u2014 and K Street business was red hot before Trump returned to the presidency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to analysis, the company topped the income chart at year-end with $16.9 million in the fourth quarter, followed by runner-up Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, which raked in $14.6 million during the quarter. In the first quarter of 2025, Brownstein's revenue decreased to $16.8 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Florida lobbyist, Brian Ballard, also a longtime, opened a office in Washington for his firm soon after Trump's first White House win in 2017 and quickly became one of the go-to company for corporations and trade groups looking to comprehend the mercurial political newcomer in the White House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While the company has a<\/a> number of Democratic lobbyists on its list, the firm's business suffered under the Biden administration. Nevertheless, it was still in the top 20 of K Street firms, POLITICO's analysis found.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ballard's ascent this year marks a cycle that occurs each time there is a change of power in Washington, as corporate America searches for an angle with an incoming president or congressional chief.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But that rhythm went into overdrive leading up to Trump's second term. Ballard, along with a few other companies with strong connections to the administration, such as Miller Strategies, Mercury Public Affairs, Michael Best Strategies and Continental Strategies, have experienced a wave of new clients since November. Those players did not return requests for their first quarter figures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Ballard has revealed over 130 new lobbying clients since Election Day alone, including JPMorgan Chase, Chevron, Palantir, Netflix, Ripple Labs and the Business Roundtable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company also signed up to lobby on behalf of a number of individuals and organizations targeted for punishment by the Trump administration, including the Harvard University governing board, the Public Broadcasting Service and law organization Kirkland & Ellis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some of Ballard's ex-lobbyists now carry senior positions in Trump's second administration, including Pam Bondi, Attorney General and Susie Wiles, White House chief of staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trent Morse, another Ballard alum, is the deputy director of personnel for Trump. The Florida origins of the firm also result in Ballard having ties to the Floridians who hold sway in Trump's Washington, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Trump fundraiser\u2019s lobbying firm triples earnings mid washington power shift","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trump-fundraisers-lobbying-firm-triples-earnings-mid-washington-power-shift","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7583","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7576,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_content":"\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n
\n

\"It takes only the collapse of one supplier to cause the suspension of an automaker's production line. Whenever it occurs, as happened during the pandemic, all the suppliers are affected, and the employees will be out of their careers.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The statement, signed on April 21, is directed at U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, U.S. Department of Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and U.S. Trade Representative Ambassador Jamieson Greer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is inked by leaders of American International Automobile Dealers Association, National Automobile Dealers Association, Autos Drive America, Alliance for Automotive Innovation, vehicle suppliers' association MEMA, and American Automotive Policy Council heads.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The joint letter is unusual, if not historic, for the auto business. Such companies seldom, if ever, endorse a collective position.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The associations claim to speak for the nation's No. 1 manufacturing<\/a> industry with 10 million American employment opportunities in all 50 states and $1.2 trillion injected into the economy annually. Other automakers that are not covered by the groups are electric car manufacturers Rivian Automotive, Tesla, and Lucid Group.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"US President Donald Trump has signaled a willingness to reconsider the policy of imposing 25 percent tariffs on imported auto parts \u2013 the same tariff relief that was recently granted to products such as electronics and semiconductors. A positive development like that would be a welcome relief,\" the letter states. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter follows on the heels of Trump's statement last week that he might allow certain auto manufacturers that require extra time to relocate or boost U.S. car manufacturing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cI\u2019m searching for solutions to assist certain car manufacturers that are transitioning to parts manufactured in Canada, Mexico, and elsewhere. They require some time to begin producing them locally,\u201d Trump stated on April 14. \u201cHowever, they do need some time, so I\u2019m discussing topics like that.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Auto executives and analysts have said president\u2019s tariffs are more catastrophic for auto parts makers than for the automakers as a whole. The effect might produce a swell impact across the international supply chain, they add.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Automotive officials project a decrease in vehicle sales by millions of units, rising prices for both new and used vehicles, and costs surpassing $100 billion throughout the industry, as indicated by research statements from Wall Street and automotive reviewers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe promote increased manufacturing and additional supply chains within the United States, but it is unfeasible to shift global supply chains overnight or even within months. This process will require time,\u201d <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

states the letter.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Automakers united in lobbying Trump against proposed auto parts tariff","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"automakers-united-in-lobbying-trump-against-proposed-auto-parts-tariff","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 20:21:32","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 20:21:32","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7598","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7591,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content":"\n

The NCAA is strengthening its federal lobbying moves in the beginning of the Trump <\/a>government, expending hundreds of thousands of bucks to control the newly Republican-headed Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The agency disbursed $450,000 on lobbying during 2025's first quarter, nearly doubled the payment it spent during the corresponding period in 2024. The payment is a continuance of the NCAA\u2019s decades-long federal lobbying measure to persuade Congress enact a law that would grant it influence over the amateurism regulations that remain. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Since last year, the NCAA has been trying to persuade Congress to formalize the terms of the House v. NCAA settlement. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe note I obtained when I came [in Washington] was: clean up your own home, and then come converse to us,\u201d <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

NCAA president Charlie Baker commented to reporters during the men\u2019s Final Four. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA views the settlement as evidence that it has taken all possible steps to reform college sports, and now it\u2019s Congress\u2019 responsibility to intervene to safeguard the remaining rules and enable the legal enforcement of additional measures, such as transfer restrictions.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To achieve this, the NCAA seeks antitrust protections, the preemption of state laws regarding NIL (name, image, and likeness), and a clause that stops college athletes from being classified as employees. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last May, the NCAA and conferences defined the compensation plan as a \u201croad map\u201d for Congress. A federal judge is anticipated to issue a ruling on final approval within the next few weeks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"NCAA is instituting positive reforms for student-athletes and responding to different issues in college athletics by mandating health and wellness benefits and guaranteeing scholarships,\" the NCAA SVP for External Affairs added in a statement to Front Office Sports. \"But some of the threats facing college sports can only be addressed by Congress, and the Association is working with student-athletes and their institutions to push for bipartisan legislation.\" Buckley pointed out the NCAA\u2019s challenges in classifying athletes as amateurs and regulating the transfer portal, among other issues, that necessitate congressional support.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA works as a nonprofit, maintaining a permanent headquarters in Indianapolis with multiple workers responsible for executing titles, supporting laws, and certainly, lobbying. However, the NCAA sees itself as a \u201cmember-driven\u201d organization\u2014merely implementing the wishes of the schools it represents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Industry experts indicated that Republicans may have been more open to the NCAA\u2019s requests, which could explain their increased lobbying efforts to pass legislation. Nevertheless, sources have informed FOS that certain House and Senate Republicans oppose at least the NCAA\u2019s requested antitrust exemptions for several reasons, notably a lack of trust in the NCAA. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

From January to March, the NCAA disbursed $90,000 to its established lobbying firm, Brownstein Hyatt, as noted in a quarterly lobbying report submitted on April 18. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA invested $90,000 in lobbying efforts with theGroup DC, a significant player they engaged in January. theGroup DC symbolizes major customers like Pepsico and UnitedHealth Group. The firm\u2019s new client registration form lists three lobbyists: two with Democratic backgrounds and one with experience working for Republicans. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A budget of $270,000 was also allocated to the NCAA's lobbyists. Since 2018, Dawn Buth has been engaged full-time handling government ties. Buth worked independently for several years before the organization hired a second in-house lobbyist last July: Kevin McColaugh, who previously worked for NCAA president Charlie Baker when he served as governor of Massachusetts. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA generally allocates between $120,000<\/a> and $140,000 for its internal lobbying activities, a figure that remained the same with McColaugh's inclusion during the third and fourth quarters of 2024.<\/p>\n","post_title":"NCAA boosts Washington lobbying to secure legal shield","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"ncaa-boosts-washington-lobbying-to-secure-legal-shield","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7591","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7583,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content":"\n

Ballard Partners, a lobbying company headed by a leading fundraiser for President Donald Trump<\/a>, has more than tripled its quarterly lobbying gains compared with the exact period a year earlier, as businesses and organizations have sought assistance from a small group of firms allied to the new administration in trying to make sense of a second Trump administration characterized by turmoil and retribution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company will bring in $14 million of lobbying income for the first quarter of 2025, over two times the $6.2 million Ballard saw in the fourth quarter of 2024. Ballard recorded $4.2 million of lobbying income during the first quarter of 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Several of K Street's largest firms are yet to post first quarter revenues as of Monday night's midnight reporting deadline, but Ballard's totals will be right up at the top when the numbers finally appear. Starting a new administration normally is big money for the lobby industry \u2014 and K Street business was red hot before Trump returned to the presidency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to analysis, the company topped the income chart at year-end with $16.9 million in the fourth quarter, followed by runner-up Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, which raked in $14.6 million during the quarter. In the first quarter of 2025, Brownstein's revenue decreased to $16.8 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Florida lobbyist, Brian Ballard, also a longtime, opened a office in Washington for his firm soon after Trump's first White House win in 2017 and quickly became one of the go-to company for corporations and trade groups looking to comprehend the mercurial political newcomer in the White House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While the company has a<\/a> number of Democratic lobbyists on its list, the firm's business suffered under the Biden administration. Nevertheless, it was still in the top 20 of K Street firms, POLITICO's analysis found.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ballard's ascent this year marks a cycle that occurs each time there is a change of power in Washington, as corporate America searches for an angle with an incoming president or congressional chief.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But that rhythm went into overdrive leading up to Trump's second term. Ballard, along with a few other companies with strong connections to the administration, such as Miller Strategies, Mercury Public Affairs, Michael Best Strategies and Continental Strategies, have experienced a wave of new clients since November. Those players did not return requests for their first quarter figures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Ballard has revealed over 130 new lobbying clients since Election Day alone, including JPMorgan Chase, Chevron, Palantir, Netflix, Ripple Labs and the Business Roundtable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company also signed up to lobby on behalf of a number of individuals and organizations targeted for punishment by the Trump administration, including the Harvard University governing board, the Public Broadcasting Service and law organization Kirkland & Ellis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some of Ballard's ex-lobbyists now carry senior positions in Trump's second administration, including Pam Bondi, Attorney General and Susie Wiles, White House chief of staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trent Morse, another Ballard alum, is the deputy director of personnel for Trump. The Florida origins of the firm also result in Ballard having ties to the Floridians who hold sway in Trump's Washington, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Trump fundraiser\u2019s lobbying firm triples earnings mid washington power shift","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trump-fundraisers-lobbying-firm-triples-earnings-mid-washington-power-shift","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7583","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7576,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_content":"\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

states the letter. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It takes only the collapse of one supplier to cause the suspension of an automaker's production line. Whenever it occurs, as happened during the pandemic, all the suppliers are affected, and the employees will be out of their careers.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The statement, signed on April 21, is directed at U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, U.S. Department of Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and U.S. Trade Representative Ambassador Jamieson Greer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is inked by leaders of American International Automobile Dealers Association, National Automobile Dealers Association, Autos Drive America, Alliance for Automotive Innovation, vehicle suppliers' association MEMA, and American Automotive Policy Council heads.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The joint letter is unusual, if not historic, for the auto business. Such companies seldom, if ever, endorse a collective position.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The associations claim to speak for the nation's No. 1 manufacturing<\/a> industry with 10 million American employment opportunities in all 50 states and $1.2 trillion injected into the economy annually. Other automakers that are not covered by the groups are electric car manufacturers Rivian Automotive, Tesla, and Lucid Group.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"US President Donald Trump has signaled a willingness to reconsider the policy of imposing 25 percent tariffs on imported auto parts \u2013 the same tariff relief that was recently granted to products such as electronics and semiconductors. A positive development like that would be a welcome relief,\" the letter states. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter follows on the heels of Trump's statement last week that he might allow certain auto manufacturers that require extra time to relocate or boost U.S. car manufacturing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cI\u2019m searching for solutions to assist certain car manufacturers that are transitioning to parts manufactured in Canada, Mexico, and elsewhere. They require some time to begin producing them locally,\u201d Trump stated on April 14. \u201cHowever, they do need some time, so I\u2019m discussing topics like that.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Auto executives and analysts have said president\u2019s tariffs are more catastrophic for auto parts makers than for the automakers as a whole. The effect might produce a swell impact across the international supply chain, they add.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Automotive officials project a decrease in vehicle sales by millions of units, rising prices for both new and used vehicles, and costs surpassing $100 billion throughout the industry, as indicated by research statements from Wall Street and automotive reviewers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe promote increased manufacturing and additional supply chains within the United States, but it is unfeasible to shift global supply chains overnight or even within months. This process will require time,\u201d <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

states the letter.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Automakers united in lobbying Trump against proposed auto parts tariff","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"automakers-united-in-lobbying-trump-against-proposed-auto-parts-tariff","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 20:21:32","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 20:21:32","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7598","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7591,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content":"\n

The NCAA is strengthening its federal lobbying moves in the beginning of the Trump <\/a>government, expending hundreds of thousands of bucks to control the newly Republican-headed Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The agency disbursed $450,000 on lobbying during 2025's first quarter, nearly doubled the payment it spent during the corresponding period in 2024. The payment is a continuance of the NCAA\u2019s decades-long federal lobbying measure to persuade Congress enact a law that would grant it influence over the amateurism regulations that remain. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Since last year, the NCAA has been trying to persuade Congress to formalize the terms of the House v. NCAA settlement. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe note I obtained when I came [in Washington] was: clean up your own home, and then come converse to us,\u201d <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

NCAA president Charlie Baker commented to reporters during the men\u2019s Final Four. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA views the settlement as evidence that it has taken all possible steps to reform college sports, and now it\u2019s Congress\u2019 responsibility to intervene to safeguard the remaining rules and enable the legal enforcement of additional measures, such as transfer restrictions.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To achieve this, the NCAA seeks antitrust protections, the preemption of state laws regarding NIL (name, image, and likeness), and a clause that stops college athletes from being classified as employees. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last May, the NCAA and conferences defined the compensation plan as a \u201croad map\u201d for Congress. A federal judge is anticipated to issue a ruling on final approval within the next few weeks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"NCAA is instituting positive reforms for student-athletes and responding to different issues in college athletics by mandating health and wellness benefits and guaranteeing scholarships,\" the NCAA SVP for External Affairs added in a statement to Front Office Sports. \"But some of the threats facing college sports can only be addressed by Congress, and the Association is working with student-athletes and their institutions to push for bipartisan legislation.\" Buckley pointed out the NCAA\u2019s challenges in classifying athletes as amateurs and regulating the transfer portal, among other issues, that necessitate congressional support.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA works as a nonprofit, maintaining a permanent headquarters in Indianapolis with multiple workers responsible for executing titles, supporting laws, and certainly, lobbying. However, the NCAA sees itself as a \u201cmember-driven\u201d organization\u2014merely implementing the wishes of the schools it represents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Industry experts indicated that Republicans may have been more open to the NCAA\u2019s requests, which could explain their increased lobbying efforts to pass legislation. Nevertheless, sources have informed FOS that certain House and Senate Republicans oppose at least the NCAA\u2019s requested antitrust exemptions for several reasons, notably a lack of trust in the NCAA. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

From January to March, the NCAA disbursed $90,000 to its established lobbying firm, Brownstein Hyatt, as noted in a quarterly lobbying report submitted on April 18. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA invested $90,000 in lobbying efforts with theGroup DC, a significant player they engaged in January. theGroup DC symbolizes major customers like Pepsico and UnitedHealth Group. The firm\u2019s new client registration form lists three lobbyists: two with Democratic backgrounds and one with experience working for Republicans. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A budget of $270,000 was also allocated to the NCAA's lobbyists. Since 2018, Dawn Buth has been engaged full-time handling government ties. Buth worked independently for several years before the organization hired a second in-house lobbyist last July: Kevin McColaugh, who previously worked for NCAA president Charlie Baker when he served as governor of Massachusetts. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA generally allocates between $120,000<\/a> and $140,000 for its internal lobbying activities, a figure that remained the same with McColaugh's inclusion during the third and fourth quarters of 2024.<\/p>\n","post_title":"NCAA boosts Washington lobbying to secure legal shield","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"ncaa-boosts-washington-lobbying-to-secure-legal-shield","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7591","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7583,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content":"\n

Ballard Partners, a lobbying company headed by a leading fundraiser for President Donald Trump<\/a>, has more than tripled its quarterly lobbying gains compared with the exact period a year earlier, as businesses and organizations have sought assistance from a small group of firms allied to the new administration in trying to make sense of a second Trump administration characterized by turmoil and retribution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company will bring in $14 million of lobbying income for the first quarter of 2025, over two times the $6.2 million Ballard saw in the fourth quarter of 2024. Ballard recorded $4.2 million of lobbying income during the first quarter of 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Several of K Street's largest firms are yet to post first quarter revenues as of Monday night's midnight reporting deadline, but Ballard's totals will be right up at the top when the numbers finally appear. Starting a new administration normally is big money for the lobby industry \u2014 and K Street business was red hot before Trump returned to the presidency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to analysis, the company topped the income chart at year-end with $16.9 million in the fourth quarter, followed by runner-up Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, which raked in $14.6 million during the quarter. In the first quarter of 2025, Brownstein's revenue decreased to $16.8 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Florida lobbyist, Brian Ballard, also a longtime, opened a office in Washington for his firm soon after Trump's first White House win in 2017 and quickly became one of the go-to company for corporations and trade groups looking to comprehend the mercurial political newcomer in the White House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While the company has a<\/a> number of Democratic lobbyists on its list, the firm's business suffered under the Biden administration. Nevertheless, it was still in the top 20 of K Street firms, POLITICO's analysis found.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ballard's ascent this year marks a cycle that occurs each time there is a change of power in Washington, as corporate America searches for an angle with an incoming president or congressional chief.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But that rhythm went into overdrive leading up to Trump's second term. Ballard, along with a few other companies with strong connections to the administration, such as Miller Strategies, Mercury Public Affairs, Michael Best Strategies and Continental Strategies, have experienced a wave of new clients since November. Those players did not return requests for their first quarter figures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Ballard has revealed over 130 new lobbying clients since Election Day alone, including JPMorgan Chase, Chevron, Palantir, Netflix, Ripple Labs and the Business Roundtable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company also signed up to lobby on behalf of a number of individuals and organizations targeted for punishment by the Trump administration, including the Harvard University governing board, the Public Broadcasting Service and law organization Kirkland & Ellis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some of Ballard's ex-lobbyists now carry senior positions in Trump's second administration, including Pam Bondi, Attorney General and Susie Wiles, White House chief of staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trent Morse, another Ballard alum, is the deputy director of personnel for Trump. The Florida origins of the firm also result in Ballard having ties to the Floridians who hold sway in Trump's Washington, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Trump fundraiser\u2019s lobbying firm triples earnings mid washington power shift","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trump-fundraisers-lobbying-firm-triples-earnings-mid-washington-power-shift","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7583","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7576,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_content":"\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

\u201cThe majority of automobile suppliers are not financed for a sudden tariff caused uproar. A lot of them are already struggling and will have production shutdowns, job losses, and bankruptcy,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

states the letter. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It takes only the collapse of one supplier to cause the suspension of an automaker's production line. Whenever it occurs, as happened during the pandemic, all the suppliers are affected, and the employees will be out of their careers.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The statement, signed on April 21, is directed at U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, U.S. Department of Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and U.S. Trade Representative Ambassador Jamieson Greer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is inked by leaders of American International Automobile Dealers Association, National Automobile Dealers Association, Autos Drive America, Alliance for Automotive Innovation, vehicle suppliers' association MEMA, and American Automotive Policy Council heads.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The joint letter is unusual, if not historic, for the auto business. Such companies seldom, if ever, endorse a collective position.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The associations claim to speak for the nation's No. 1 manufacturing<\/a> industry with 10 million American employment opportunities in all 50 states and $1.2 trillion injected into the economy annually. Other automakers that are not covered by the groups are electric car manufacturers Rivian Automotive, Tesla, and Lucid Group.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"US President Donald Trump has signaled a willingness to reconsider the policy of imposing 25 percent tariffs on imported auto parts \u2013 the same tariff relief that was recently granted to products such as electronics and semiconductors. A positive development like that would be a welcome relief,\" the letter states. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter follows on the heels of Trump's statement last week that he might allow certain auto manufacturers that require extra time to relocate or boost U.S. car manufacturing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cI\u2019m searching for solutions to assist certain car manufacturers that are transitioning to parts manufactured in Canada, Mexico, and elsewhere. They require some time to begin producing them locally,\u201d Trump stated on April 14. \u201cHowever, they do need some time, so I\u2019m discussing topics like that.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Auto executives and analysts have said president\u2019s tariffs are more catastrophic for auto parts makers than for the automakers as a whole. The effect might produce a swell impact across the international supply chain, they add.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Automotive officials project a decrease in vehicle sales by millions of units, rising prices for both new and used vehicles, and costs surpassing $100 billion throughout the industry, as indicated by research statements from Wall Street and automotive reviewers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe promote increased manufacturing and additional supply chains within the United States, but it is unfeasible to shift global supply chains overnight or even within months. This process will require time,\u201d <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

states the letter.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Automakers united in lobbying Trump against proposed auto parts tariff","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"automakers-united-in-lobbying-trump-against-proposed-auto-parts-tariff","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 20:21:32","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 20:21:32","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7598","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7591,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content":"\n

The NCAA is strengthening its federal lobbying moves in the beginning of the Trump <\/a>government, expending hundreds of thousands of bucks to control the newly Republican-headed Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The agency disbursed $450,000 on lobbying during 2025's first quarter, nearly doubled the payment it spent during the corresponding period in 2024. The payment is a continuance of the NCAA\u2019s decades-long federal lobbying measure to persuade Congress enact a law that would grant it influence over the amateurism regulations that remain. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Since last year, the NCAA has been trying to persuade Congress to formalize the terms of the House v. NCAA settlement. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe note I obtained when I came [in Washington] was: clean up your own home, and then come converse to us,\u201d <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

NCAA president Charlie Baker commented to reporters during the men\u2019s Final Four. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA views the settlement as evidence that it has taken all possible steps to reform college sports, and now it\u2019s Congress\u2019 responsibility to intervene to safeguard the remaining rules and enable the legal enforcement of additional measures, such as transfer restrictions.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To achieve this, the NCAA seeks antitrust protections, the preemption of state laws regarding NIL (name, image, and likeness), and a clause that stops college athletes from being classified as employees. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last May, the NCAA and conferences defined the compensation plan as a \u201croad map\u201d for Congress. A federal judge is anticipated to issue a ruling on final approval within the next few weeks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"NCAA is instituting positive reforms for student-athletes and responding to different issues in college athletics by mandating health and wellness benefits and guaranteeing scholarships,\" the NCAA SVP for External Affairs added in a statement to Front Office Sports. \"But some of the threats facing college sports can only be addressed by Congress, and the Association is working with student-athletes and their institutions to push for bipartisan legislation.\" Buckley pointed out the NCAA\u2019s challenges in classifying athletes as amateurs and regulating the transfer portal, among other issues, that necessitate congressional support.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA works as a nonprofit, maintaining a permanent headquarters in Indianapolis with multiple workers responsible for executing titles, supporting laws, and certainly, lobbying. However, the NCAA sees itself as a \u201cmember-driven\u201d organization\u2014merely implementing the wishes of the schools it represents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Industry experts indicated that Republicans may have been more open to the NCAA\u2019s requests, which could explain their increased lobbying efforts to pass legislation. Nevertheless, sources have informed FOS that certain House and Senate Republicans oppose at least the NCAA\u2019s requested antitrust exemptions for several reasons, notably a lack of trust in the NCAA. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

From January to March, the NCAA disbursed $90,000 to its established lobbying firm, Brownstein Hyatt, as noted in a quarterly lobbying report submitted on April 18. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA invested $90,000 in lobbying efforts with theGroup DC, a significant player they engaged in January. theGroup DC symbolizes major customers like Pepsico and UnitedHealth Group. The firm\u2019s new client registration form lists three lobbyists: two with Democratic backgrounds and one with experience working for Republicans. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A budget of $270,000 was also allocated to the NCAA's lobbyists. Since 2018, Dawn Buth has been engaged full-time handling government ties. Buth worked independently for several years before the organization hired a second in-house lobbyist last July: Kevin McColaugh, who previously worked for NCAA president Charlie Baker when he served as governor of Massachusetts. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA generally allocates between $120,000<\/a> and $140,000 for its internal lobbying activities, a figure that remained the same with McColaugh's inclusion during the third and fourth quarters of 2024.<\/p>\n","post_title":"NCAA boosts Washington lobbying to secure legal shield","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"ncaa-boosts-washington-lobbying-to-secure-legal-shield","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7591","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7583,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content":"\n

Ballard Partners, a lobbying company headed by a leading fundraiser for President Donald Trump<\/a>, has more than tripled its quarterly lobbying gains compared with the exact period a year earlier, as businesses and organizations have sought assistance from a small group of firms allied to the new administration in trying to make sense of a second Trump administration characterized by turmoil and retribution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company will bring in $14 million of lobbying income for the first quarter of 2025, over two times the $6.2 million Ballard saw in the fourth quarter of 2024. Ballard recorded $4.2 million of lobbying income during the first quarter of 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Several of K Street's largest firms are yet to post first quarter revenues as of Monday night's midnight reporting deadline, but Ballard's totals will be right up at the top when the numbers finally appear. Starting a new administration normally is big money for the lobby industry \u2014 and K Street business was red hot before Trump returned to the presidency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to analysis, the company topped the income chart at year-end with $16.9 million in the fourth quarter, followed by runner-up Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, which raked in $14.6 million during the quarter. In the first quarter of 2025, Brownstein's revenue decreased to $16.8 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Florida lobbyist, Brian Ballard, also a longtime, opened a office in Washington for his firm soon after Trump's first White House win in 2017 and quickly became one of the go-to company for corporations and trade groups looking to comprehend the mercurial political newcomer in the White House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While the company has a<\/a> number of Democratic lobbyists on its list, the firm's business suffered under the Biden administration. Nevertheless, it was still in the top 20 of K Street firms, POLITICO's analysis found.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ballard's ascent this year marks a cycle that occurs each time there is a change of power in Washington, as corporate America searches for an angle with an incoming president or congressional chief.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But that rhythm went into overdrive leading up to Trump's second term. Ballard, along with a few other companies with strong connections to the administration, such as Miller Strategies, Mercury Public Affairs, Michael Best Strategies and Continental Strategies, have experienced a wave of new clients since November. Those players did not return requests for their first quarter figures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Ballard has revealed over 130 new lobbying clients since Election Day alone, including JPMorgan Chase, Chevron, Palantir, Netflix, Ripple Labs and the Business Roundtable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company also signed up to lobby on behalf of a number of individuals and organizations targeted for punishment by the Trump administration, including the Harvard University governing board, the Public Broadcasting Service and law organization Kirkland & Ellis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some of Ballard's ex-lobbyists now carry senior positions in Trump's second administration, including Pam Bondi, Attorney General and Susie Wiles, White House chief of staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trent Morse, another Ballard alum, is the deputy director of personnel for Trump. The Florida origins of the firm also result in Ballard having ties to the Floridians who hold sway in Trump's Washington, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Trump fundraiser\u2019s lobbying firm triples earnings mid washington power shift","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trump-fundraisers-lobbying-firm-triples-earnings-mid-washington-power-shift","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7583","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7576,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_content":"\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n
\n

\u201cThe majority of automobile suppliers are not financed for a sudden tariff caused uproar. A lot of them are already struggling and will have production shutdowns, job losses, and bankruptcy,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

states the letter. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It takes only the collapse of one supplier to cause the suspension of an automaker's production line. Whenever it occurs, as happened during the pandemic, all the suppliers are affected, and the employees will be out of their careers.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The statement, signed on April 21, is directed at U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, U.S. Department of Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and U.S. Trade Representative Ambassador Jamieson Greer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is inked by leaders of American International Automobile Dealers Association, National Automobile Dealers Association, Autos Drive America, Alliance for Automotive Innovation, vehicle suppliers' association MEMA, and American Automotive Policy Council heads.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The joint letter is unusual, if not historic, for the auto business. Such companies seldom, if ever, endorse a collective position.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The associations claim to speak for the nation's No. 1 manufacturing<\/a> industry with 10 million American employment opportunities in all 50 states and $1.2 trillion injected into the economy annually. Other automakers that are not covered by the groups are electric car manufacturers Rivian Automotive, Tesla, and Lucid Group.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"US President Donald Trump has signaled a willingness to reconsider the policy of imposing 25 percent tariffs on imported auto parts \u2013 the same tariff relief that was recently granted to products such as electronics and semiconductors. A positive development like that would be a welcome relief,\" the letter states. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter follows on the heels of Trump's statement last week that he might allow certain auto manufacturers that require extra time to relocate or boost U.S. car manufacturing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cI\u2019m searching for solutions to assist certain car manufacturers that are transitioning to parts manufactured in Canada, Mexico, and elsewhere. They require some time to begin producing them locally,\u201d Trump stated on April 14. \u201cHowever, they do need some time, so I\u2019m discussing topics like that.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Auto executives and analysts have said president\u2019s tariffs are more catastrophic for auto parts makers than for the automakers as a whole. The effect might produce a swell impact across the international supply chain, they add.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Automotive officials project a decrease in vehicle sales by millions of units, rising prices for both new and used vehicles, and costs surpassing $100 billion throughout the industry, as indicated by research statements from Wall Street and automotive reviewers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe promote increased manufacturing and additional supply chains within the United States, but it is unfeasible to shift global supply chains overnight or even within months. This process will require time,\u201d <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

states the letter.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Automakers united in lobbying Trump against proposed auto parts tariff","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"automakers-united-in-lobbying-trump-against-proposed-auto-parts-tariff","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 20:21:32","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 20:21:32","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7598","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7591,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content":"\n

The NCAA is strengthening its federal lobbying moves in the beginning of the Trump <\/a>government, expending hundreds of thousands of bucks to control the newly Republican-headed Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The agency disbursed $450,000 on lobbying during 2025's first quarter, nearly doubled the payment it spent during the corresponding period in 2024. The payment is a continuance of the NCAA\u2019s decades-long federal lobbying measure to persuade Congress enact a law that would grant it influence over the amateurism regulations that remain. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Since last year, the NCAA has been trying to persuade Congress to formalize the terms of the House v. NCAA settlement. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe note I obtained when I came [in Washington] was: clean up your own home, and then come converse to us,\u201d <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

NCAA president Charlie Baker commented to reporters during the men\u2019s Final Four. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA views the settlement as evidence that it has taken all possible steps to reform college sports, and now it\u2019s Congress\u2019 responsibility to intervene to safeguard the remaining rules and enable the legal enforcement of additional measures, such as transfer restrictions.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To achieve this, the NCAA seeks antitrust protections, the preemption of state laws regarding NIL (name, image, and likeness), and a clause that stops college athletes from being classified as employees. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last May, the NCAA and conferences defined the compensation plan as a \u201croad map\u201d for Congress. A federal judge is anticipated to issue a ruling on final approval within the next few weeks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"NCAA is instituting positive reforms for student-athletes and responding to different issues in college athletics by mandating health and wellness benefits and guaranteeing scholarships,\" the NCAA SVP for External Affairs added in a statement to Front Office Sports. \"But some of the threats facing college sports can only be addressed by Congress, and the Association is working with student-athletes and their institutions to push for bipartisan legislation.\" Buckley pointed out the NCAA\u2019s challenges in classifying athletes as amateurs and regulating the transfer portal, among other issues, that necessitate congressional support.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA works as a nonprofit, maintaining a permanent headquarters in Indianapolis with multiple workers responsible for executing titles, supporting laws, and certainly, lobbying. However, the NCAA sees itself as a \u201cmember-driven\u201d organization\u2014merely implementing the wishes of the schools it represents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Industry experts indicated that Republicans may have been more open to the NCAA\u2019s requests, which could explain their increased lobbying efforts to pass legislation. Nevertheless, sources have informed FOS that certain House and Senate Republicans oppose at least the NCAA\u2019s requested antitrust exemptions for several reasons, notably a lack of trust in the NCAA. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

From January to March, the NCAA disbursed $90,000 to its established lobbying firm, Brownstein Hyatt, as noted in a quarterly lobbying report submitted on April 18. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA invested $90,000 in lobbying efforts with theGroup DC, a significant player they engaged in January. theGroup DC symbolizes major customers like Pepsico and UnitedHealth Group. The firm\u2019s new client registration form lists three lobbyists: two with Democratic backgrounds and one with experience working for Republicans. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A budget of $270,000 was also allocated to the NCAA's lobbyists. Since 2018, Dawn Buth has been engaged full-time handling government ties. Buth worked independently for several years before the organization hired a second in-house lobbyist last July: Kevin McColaugh, who previously worked for NCAA president Charlie Baker when he served as governor of Massachusetts. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA generally allocates between $120,000<\/a> and $140,000 for its internal lobbying activities, a figure that remained the same with McColaugh's inclusion during the third and fourth quarters of 2024.<\/p>\n","post_title":"NCAA boosts Washington lobbying to secure legal shield","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"ncaa-boosts-washington-lobbying-to-secure-legal-shield","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7591","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7583,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content":"\n

Ballard Partners, a lobbying company headed by a leading fundraiser for President Donald Trump<\/a>, has more than tripled its quarterly lobbying gains compared with the exact period a year earlier, as businesses and organizations have sought assistance from a small group of firms allied to the new administration in trying to make sense of a second Trump administration characterized by turmoil and retribution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company will bring in $14 million of lobbying income for the first quarter of 2025, over two times the $6.2 million Ballard saw in the fourth quarter of 2024. Ballard recorded $4.2 million of lobbying income during the first quarter of 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Several of K Street's largest firms are yet to post first quarter revenues as of Monday night's midnight reporting deadline, but Ballard's totals will be right up at the top when the numbers finally appear. Starting a new administration normally is big money for the lobby industry \u2014 and K Street business was red hot before Trump returned to the presidency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to analysis, the company topped the income chart at year-end with $16.9 million in the fourth quarter, followed by runner-up Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, which raked in $14.6 million during the quarter. In the first quarter of 2025, Brownstein's revenue decreased to $16.8 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Florida lobbyist, Brian Ballard, also a longtime, opened a office in Washington for his firm soon after Trump's first White House win in 2017 and quickly became one of the go-to company for corporations and trade groups looking to comprehend the mercurial political newcomer in the White House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While the company has a<\/a> number of Democratic lobbyists on its list, the firm's business suffered under the Biden administration. Nevertheless, it was still in the top 20 of K Street firms, POLITICO's analysis found.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ballard's ascent this year marks a cycle that occurs each time there is a change of power in Washington, as corporate America searches for an angle with an incoming president or congressional chief.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But that rhythm went into overdrive leading up to Trump's second term. Ballard, along with a few other companies with strong connections to the administration, such as Miller Strategies, Mercury Public Affairs, Michael Best Strategies and Continental Strategies, have experienced a wave of new clients since November. Those players did not return requests for their first quarter figures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Ballard has revealed over 130 new lobbying clients since Election Day alone, including JPMorgan Chase, Chevron, Palantir, Netflix, Ripple Labs and the Business Roundtable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company also signed up to lobby on behalf of a number of individuals and organizations targeted for punishment by the Trump administration, including the Harvard University governing board, the Public Broadcasting Service and law organization Kirkland & Ellis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some of Ballard's ex-lobbyists now carry senior positions in Trump's second administration, including Pam Bondi, Attorney General and Susie Wiles, White House chief of staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trent Morse, another Ballard alum, is the deputy director of personnel for Trump. The Florida origins of the firm also result in Ballard having ties to the Floridians who hold sway in Trump's Washington, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Trump fundraiser\u2019s lobbying firm triples earnings mid washington power shift","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trump-fundraisers-lobbying-firm-triples-earnings-mid-washington-power-shift","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7583","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7576,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_content":"\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Six of the leading policy organizations that speak for the U.S. auto industry are unusually coming together to lobby the Trump<\/a> government to oppose 25% tariffs on auto parts scheduled to go into force by May 3. The coalition \u2013 speaking for franchised automakers, suppliers and almost all significant automakers \u2013 write in a note to Trump government officials that the impending tariffs threaten U.S. automotive manufacturing. The note mentions numerous auto suppliers already have financial difficulties and might not meet the additional expense enlargements, causing more widespread industry issues.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe majority of automobile suppliers are not financed for a sudden tariff caused uproar. A lot of them are already struggling and will have production shutdowns, job losses, and bankruptcy,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

states the letter. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It takes only the collapse of one supplier to cause the suspension of an automaker's production line. Whenever it occurs, as happened during the pandemic, all the suppliers are affected, and the employees will be out of their careers.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The statement, signed on April 21, is directed at U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, U.S. Department of Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and U.S. Trade Representative Ambassador Jamieson Greer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is inked by leaders of American International Automobile Dealers Association, National Automobile Dealers Association, Autos Drive America, Alliance for Automotive Innovation, vehicle suppliers' association MEMA, and American Automotive Policy Council heads.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The joint letter is unusual, if not historic, for the auto business. Such companies seldom, if ever, endorse a collective position.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The associations claim to speak for the nation's No. 1 manufacturing<\/a> industry with 10 million American employment opportunities in all 50 states and $1.2 trillion injected into the economy annually. Other automakers that are not covered by the groups are electric car manufacturers Rivian Automotive, Tesla, and Lucid Group.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"US President Donald Trump has signaled a willingness to reconsider the policy of imposing 25 percent tariffs on imported auto parts \u2013 the same tariff relief that was recently granted to products such as electronics and semiconductors. A positive development like that would be a welcome relief,\" the letter states. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The letter follows on the heels of Trump's statement last week that he might allow certain auto manufacturers that require extra time to relocate or boost U.S. car manufacturing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cI\u2019m searching for solutions to assist certain car manufacturers that are transitioning to parts manufactured in Canada, Mexico, and elsewhere. They require some time to begin producing them locally,\u201d Trump stated on April 14. \u201cHowever, they do need some time, so I\u2019m discussing topics like that.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Auto executives and analysts have said president\u2019s tariffs are more catastrophic for auto parts makers than for the automakers as a whole. The effect might produce a swell impact across the international supply chain, they add.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Automotive officials project a decrease in vehicle sales by millions of units, rising prices for both new and used vehicles, and costs surpassing $100 billion throughout the industry, as indicated by research statements from Wall Street and automotive reviewers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe promote increased manufacturing and additional supply chains within the United States, but it is unfeasible to shift global supply chains overnight or even within months. This process will require time,\u201d <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

states the letter.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Automakers united in lobbying Trump against proposed auto parts tariff","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"automakers-united-in-lobbying-trump-against-proposed-auto-parts-tariff","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 20:21:32","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 20:21:32","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7598","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7591,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content":"\n

The NCAA is strengthening its federal lobbying moves in the beginning of the Trump <\/a>government, expending hundreds of thousands of bucks to control the newly Republican-headed Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The agency disbursed $450,000 on lobbying during 2025's first quarter, nearly doubled the payment it spent during the corresponding period in 2024. The payment is a continuance of the NCAA\u2019s decades-long federal lobbying measure to persuade Congress enact a law that would grant it influence over the amateurism regulations that remain. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Since last year, the NCAA has been trying to persuade Congress to formalize the terms of the House v. NCAA settlement. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe note I obtained when I came [in Washington] was: clean up your own home, and then come converse to us,\u201d <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

NCAA president Charlie Baker commented to reporters during the men\u2019s Final Four. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA views the settlement as evidence that it has taken all possible steps to reform college sports, and now it\u2019s Congress\u2019 responsibility to intervene to safeguard the remaining rules and enable the legal enforcement of additional measures, such as transfer restrictions.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To achieve this, the NCAA seeks antitrust protections, the preemption of state laws regarding NIL (name, image, and likeness), and a clause that stops college athletes from being classified as employees. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last May, the NCAA and conferences defined the compensation plan as a \u201croad map\u201d for Congress. A federal judge is anticipated to issue a ruling on final approval within the next few weeks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"NCAA is instituting positive reforms for student-athletes and responding to different issues in college athletics by mandating health and wellness benefits and guaranteeing scholarships,\" the NCAA SVP for External Affairs added in a statement to Front Office Sports. \"But some of the threats facing college sports can only be addressed by Congress, and the Association is working with student-athletes and their institutions to push for bipartisan legislation.\" Buckley pointed out the NCAA\u2019s challenges in classifying athletes as amateurs and regulating the transfer portal, among other issues, that necessitate congressional support.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA works as a nonprofit, maintaining a permanent headquarters in Indianapolis with multiple workers responsible for executing titles, supporting laws, and certainly, lobbying. However, the NCAA sees itself as a \u201cmember-driven\u201d organization\u2014merely implementing the wishes of the schools it represents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Industry experts indicated that Republicans may have been more open to the NCAA\u2019s requests, which could explain their increased lobbying efforts to pass legislation. Nevertheless, sources have informed FOS that certain House and Senate Republicans oppose at least the NCAA\u2019s requested antitrust exemptions for several reasons, notably a lack of trust in the NCAA. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

From January to March, the NCAA disbursed $90,000 to its established lobbying firm, Brownstein Hyatt, as noted in a quarterly lobbying report submitted on April 18. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA invested $90,000 in lobbying efforts with theGroup DC, a significant player they engaged in January. theGroup DC symbolizes major customers like Pepsico and UnitedHealth Group. The firm\u2019s new client registration form lists three lobbyists: two with Democratic backgrounds and one with experience working for Republicans. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A budget of $270,000 was also allocated to the NCAA's lobbyists. Since 2018, Dawn Buth has been engaged full-time handling government ties. Buth worked independently for several years before the organization hired a second in-house lobbyist last July: Kevin McColaugh, who previously worked for NCAA president Charlie Baker when he served as governor of Massachusetts. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NCAA generally allocates between $120,000<\/a> and $140,000 for its internal lobbying activities, a figure that remained the same with McColaugh's inclusion during the third and fourth quarters of 2024.<\/p>\n","post_title":"NCAA boosts Washington lobbying to secure legal shield","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"ncaa-boosts-washington-lobbying-to-secure-legal-shield","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-24 19:21:00","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7591","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7583,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content":"\n

Ballard Partners, a lobbying company headed by a leading fundraiser for President Donald Trump<\/a>, has more than tripled its quarterly lobbying gains compared with the exact period a year earlier, as businesses and organizations have sought assistance from a small group of firms allied to the new administration in trying to make sense of a second Trump administration characterized by turmoil and retribution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company will bring in $14 million of lobbying income for the first quarter of 2025, over two times the $6.2 million Ballard saw in the fourth quarter of 2024. Ballard recorded $4.2 million of lobbying income during the first quarter of 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Several of K Street's largest firms are yet to post first quarter revenues as of Monday night's midnight reporting deadline, but Ballard's totals will be right up at the top when the numbers finally appear. Starting a new administration normally is big money for the lobby industry \u2014 and K Street business was red hot before Trump returned to the presidency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to analysis, the company topped the income chart at year-end with $16.9 million in the fourth quarter, followed by runner-up Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, which raked in $14.6 million during the quarter. In the first quarter of 2025, Brownstein's revenue decreased to $16.8 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Florida lobbyist, Brian Ballard, also a longtime, opened a office in Washington for his firm soon after Trump's first White House win in 2017 and quickly became one of the go-to company for corporations and trade groups looking to comprehend the mercurial political newcomer in the White House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While the company has a<\/a> number of Democratic lobbyists on its list, the firm's business suffered under the Biden administration. Nevertheless, it was still in the top 20 of K Street firms, POLITICO's analysis found.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ballard's ascent this year marks a cycle that occurs each time there is a change of power in Washington, as corporate America searches for an angle with an incoming president or congressional chief.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But that rhythm went into overdrive leading up to Trump's second term. Ballard, along with a few other companies with strong connections to the administration, such as Miller Strategies, Mercury Public Affairs, Michael Best Strategies and Continental Strategies, have experienced a wave of new clients since November. Those players did not return requests for their first quarter figures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Ballard has revealed over 130 new lobbying clients since Election Day alone, including JPMorgan Chase, Chevron, Palantir, Netflix, Ripple Labs and the Business Roundtable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company also signed up to lobby on behalf of a number of individuals and organizations targeted for punishment by the Trump administration, including the Harvard University governing board, the Public Broadcasting Service and law organization Kirkland & Ellis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some of Ballard's ex-lobbyists now carry senior positions in Trump's second administration, including Pam Bondi, Attorney General and Susie Wiles, White House chief of staff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trent Morse, another Ballard alum, is the deputy director of personnel for Trump. The Florida origins of the firm also result in Ballard having ties to the Floridians who hold sway in Trump's Washington, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Trump fundraiser\u2019s lobbying firm triples earnings mid washington power shift","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"trump-fundraisers-lobbying-firm-triples-earnings-mid-washington-power-shift","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 14:54:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7583","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7576,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-21 08:20:32","post_content":"\n

Microsoft announced that it entered into an agreement for a project in Louisiana that would sequester 6.75 million metric tons of carbon dioxide over 15 years, which it claims is the largest permanent carbon removal project in the world to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technology giant's greenhouse gas emissions last year were 29.1% above levels in 2020 as increasing demand for power for artificial intelligence applications and other purposes and it most recently reported annual greenhouse gas emissions of 17.2 million tons towards the end of 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AtmosClear's carbon capture project, which is to be developed in the Port of Greater Baton Rouge, utilizes materials such as sugarcane bagasse and forest trimmings to produce energy, with the corresponding carbon emissions being captured and sequestered underground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deal is one of the efforts by Microsoft to achieve carbon negativity by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move is made as the future of U.S. carbon removal and sequestration projects, which have been encouraged in recent years by an $85 a ton federal tax credit called 45Q, remains uncertain. The Trump administration<\/a> is trying to roll back several decarbonization incentives that were enacted during former President Joe Biden's tenure in office in future budget negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The firms declined to comment on whether the project will go ahead if the tax credit is reduced or repealed by the Trump administration. Fidelis, the firm based in Texas that owns AtmosClear, said it anticipates utilizing<\/a> the 45Q tax credit for the carbon sequestration part of the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fidelis has put the project at over $800 million of investment and approximately 75 permanent and 600 construction positions, and potentially bring back forestry management employment in the area that had been affected by recent mill shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brian Marrs, Microsoft's senior director of energy and carbon, stated in a release the technology company appreciated the focus of the deal on jobs in local agricultural communities. It would also demonstrate Louisiana's leadership in becoming a center for carbon management research and applied technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana state officials have been lobbying the U.S. Department of Energy and the state congressional delegation in the past few days to persuade them to preserve federal funding to facilitate the state's proposed Direct Air Capture facility in Calcasieu Parish, as well as the 45Q tax credit. The plant would be constructed starting from 2026, and commercial operations would be initiated in 2029.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying game behind Microsoft\u2019s $800 million carbon capture deal","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-game-behind-microsofts-800-million-carbon-capture-deal","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-22 08:37:41","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7576","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7568,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_date_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content":"\n

Bank of America is lobbying Congress to enact legislation that will benefit banks when deciding who can issue stablecoins. The $284 billion Global Systemically Important Bank (G-SIB) will seek to restrict the legal capabilities of non-banks to create stablecoins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CEO Brian Moynihan this year has been collaborating with lobbying organizations such as the American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute, according to reports. He would like to release a fully reserved, 1:1 backed \"Bank of America coin.\" If the bank succeeds, it could restrict the stablecoin initiatives of non-banks such as Coinbase, Circle, Amazon, Meta, Tether, and numerous others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America wants to compete with Circle, Tether<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Circle is also engaging in its own lobbying activities. The firm's largest stablecoin, USDC, boasts a $60 billion market cap that is second only to Tether's $144 billion USDT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As opposed to Tether, which has a recorded past of being a target of regulatory action, Bank of America lobbyists are arguing that it will always remain open and subject to US regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naturally, Bank of America has not been abiding by US laws at all times, such as underpaying<\/a> for FDIC insurance, charging customers twice, breaking the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and a DoJ financial fraud suit which resulted in a fine of over $16 billion. Both the House and Senate are debating legislation that would control stablecoins. Senators, for instance, presented the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Representatives in the House presented the STABLE Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neither bill rules out the fact that a US firm can issue a stablecoin whether or not it is a bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bank of America clearly is seeking to have language regarding the bank's special ability to do business or collateralize stablecoins inserted into any final bill presented to Donald Trump<\/a>'s desk for his signature. Bank of America also would like rule-making by US government agencies such as the US Federal Reserve and Treasury, and their bureaus to favor or even grant exclusivity to bank-run stablecoins.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Bank of America lobbies Congress to secure monopoly on stablecoins","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"bank-of-america-lobbies-congress-to-secure-monopoly-on-stablecoins","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_modified_gmt":"2025-04-20 10:59:46","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7568","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":47},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

Page 47 of 75 1 46 47 48 75