The hidden costs of Biden’s immigration policies

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
The hidden costs of Biden’s immigration policies
Credit: Townhall Media

The idea of mass deportations is hated by the Trump-hating media. The fact that voters support it irritates them. According to a poll conducted after the election, 57% of Americans are prepared to restrict illegal immigration. Naturally, Raddatz did not explain that the American Immigration Council, a left-leaning lobbying organization that strongly opposes deportation, provided her estimate. This is the same Sunday-show sheriff who said,

“I’m going to stop you,”

when J.D. Vance was criticizing Venezuelan gangs occupying apartment buildings in Aurora, Colorado. There were only a few apartment buildings where the occurrences occurred. Notably, Vance asked, “Do you hear yourself?”

Hidden burdens of open borders

The journalists would first claim that mass importation had just occurred. There was no policy. This is as blatantly dishonest as allowing Team Biden to assert that “there is no border crisis.” All of President Donald Trump’s border barriers were removed by President Joe Biden, and his administration extended complete amnesty to Cubans, Haitians, and Venezuelans. It wasn’t an accident. Raddatz was accusing. Republican governors in 2022 of being responsible for large-scale illegal immigration. “I don’t think I’ve ever heard President Biden said,

‘We have an open border; come on over.'”

Raddatz said Texas Governor Greg Abbott, about the border wall and open borders. However, you, previous President Trump, and Ron DeSantis are the ones I’ve heard mention it. Mexico and other countries are affected by that message. As a result, they do understand that the border is open and that traffickers utilize such rhetoric.

Biden’s immigration oversight

Because they support these programs, journalists have never been concerned about their expenses, so why raise doubtful questions about them? They do not oppose a rapid increase in government expenditures. However, they exhibit a strong desire to challenge Republicans and expose their potential hypocrisy in attempting to undo the Biden measures. In response, Donalds cited the House Budget Committee’s Republican report, which states that

“the cost of massive illegal immigration to the federal government, to state governments, and to local governments is more than $150 billion per year.”

Voters frequently object to the use of tax resources to provide free meals, bank cards, and hotel accommodations for undocumented immigrants. There have been significant changes in the demographics of immigration. As a result of new geopolitical challenges and economic opportunities, immigration today includes an increasing number of people from many regions, including Asia and Africa. Public opinion has grown more doubtful of the administration’s approach to immigration, with multiple polls showing a great deal of annoyance about perceived laxity. State governments have also assumed larger roles, supporting and opposing federal government policies.

The price of mass migration

Donalds continued: “So if you’re going to say that it cost us $300 billion over a decade to repatriate illegal aliens to their home country versus the American taxpayer having to pay more than a trillion dollars over the same decade to keep those illegal aliens in the United States, that is a saving to the American people.” It’s safe to assume that journalists don’t consider this to be a spending or saving issue. It’s a really good question. They saw themselves as resisting the smell of “white nationalists” who protest illegal immigrants’ presence and promoting the “diversity” and “inclusion” that they bring across the border. Both sides of the political spectrum have criticized the Biden administration’s complicated and contentious immigration policy. When he took office, President Joe Biden aimed to undo many of the stringent immigration laws that had been implemented under President Donald Trump. Notwithstanding his goals, obstacles remained, demonstrating how challenging it is to implement comprehensive immigration reform.

Unseen costs of immigration

In addition to restoring the immigration system, the Biden administration sought to innovate it. On the one hand, the government has been quite active; by December 2024, it had taken 605 executive orders about immigration, more than Trump did in his first term (472 acts). Among these actions are the restoration of lawful immigration procedures and the resettlement of refugees to numbers not observed since the 1990s. Under Biden’s leadership, about 3.5 million people have obtained citizenship, making it the highest number of naturalizations for any president. Biden’s detractors contend that rather than bringing about meaningful change, his ideas are a continuation of Trump-era policies. For instance, proponents of immigrant rights have voiced dissatisfaction, claiming that the administration frequently used tactics similar to those of its predecessor, even as Biden pushed for reforms. Biden’s pledges to enact more compassionate immigration laws are called into question by the tightening of asylum requirements and the rise in deportations.

Research Staff

Research Staff

Sign up for our Newsletter