\n
\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

Page 38 of 70 1 37 38 39 70
\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

Page 38 of 70 1 37 38 39 70
\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

Page 38 of 70 1 37 38 39 70
\n
\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

Page 38 of 70 1 37 38 39 70
\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

Page 38 of 70 1 37 38 39 70
\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

Page 38 of 70 1 37 38 39 70
\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n
\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n
\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

For example, documents disseminated by Qatari foreign agents employed by Venable minimize the Gulf state's ties to terrorist groups while highlighting what Qatar considers to be the benefits of investments made by its sovereign wealth fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Communications from other companies representing Qatar provide some information, even if it may not be quite apparent what Neale Creek and King are saying to Congressmen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, documents disseminated by Qatari foreign agents employed by Venable minimize the Gulf state's ties to terrorist groups while highlighting what Qatar considers to be the benefits of investments made by its sovereign wealth fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

The impact of Neale Creek goes beyond Graham's workplace. The company has met with congressional sources in person, over the phone, over email, and through text messages, and has contributed close to $180,000 to members of Congress and related PACs since 2020. With almost $225,000 in donations made since 2020, Qatari foreign agents employed by Rubin Turnbull & Associates jointly made the largest contributions to political groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Communications from other companies representing Qatar provide some information, even if it may not be quite apparent what Neale Creek and King are saying to Congressmen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, documents disseminated by Qatari foreign agents employed by Venable minimize the Gulf state's ties to terrorist groups while highlighting what Qatar considers to be the benefits of investments made by its sovereign wealth fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

According to materials submitted to the Department of Justice, King and Neale Creek engaged in \"the promotion of business with the State of Qatar\" by using the access that congressional offices provided them. Graham's native state of South Carolina has significant investments from Qatar. However, the DOJ's Foreign Agents Registration Act database does not contain the particular papers that were exchanged between Neale Creek and congressional representatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The impact of Neale Creek goes beyond Graham's workplace. The company has met with congressional sources in person, over the phone, over email, and through text messages, and has contributed close to $180,000 to members of Congress and related PACs since 2020. With almost $225,000 in donations made since 2020, Qatari foreign agents employed by Rubin Turnbull & Associates jointly made the largest contributions to political groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Communications from other companies representing Qatar provide some information, even if it may not be quite apparent what Neale Creek and King are saying to Congressmen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, documents disseminated by Qatari foreign agents employed by Venable minimize the Gulf state's ties to terrorist groups while highlighting what Qatar considers to be the benefits of investments made by its sovereign wealth fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Andrew King, a Qatari foreign agent who made large donations to Graham's political action organizations, has more than just financial connections to the senator from South Carolina. King spent almost 20 years as a senior worker in Graham's office, where he oversaw the office's Middle Eastern affairs among other things, before starting Neale Creek, his government relations and political consulting business. In addition to his own political donations, King is the treasurer and co-founder of 150 PAC, which has given thousands of dollars to Graham and other members of Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to materials submitted to the Department of Justice, King and Neale Creek engaged in \"the promotion of business with the State of Qatar\" by using the access that congressional offices provided them. Graham's native state of South Carolina has significant investments from Qatar. However, the DOJ's Foreign Agents Registration Act database does not contain the particular papers that were exchanged between Neale Creek and congressional representatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The impact of Neale Creek goes beyond Graham's workplace. The company has met with congressional sources in person, over the phone, over email, and through text messages, and has contributed close to $180,000 to members of Congress and related PACs since 2020. With almost $225,000 in donations made since 2020, Qatari foreign agents employed by Rubin Turnbull & Associates jointly made the largest contributions to political groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Communications from other companies representing Qatar provide some information, even if it may not be quite apparent what Neale Creek and King are saying to Congressmen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, documents disseminated by Qatari foreign agents employed by Venable minimize the Gulf state's ties to terrorist groups while highlighting what Qatar considers to be the benefits of investments made by its sovereign wealth fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

According to a 2018 scholarly study, when problems that are important to lobbyists are at the center of the political process, they boost their donations to certain committees and MPs. These lobbying payments may be driven by a desire to influence policy, as evidenced by another 2015 study that found that giving to a member of Congress improves access to their office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Andrew King, a Qatari foreign agent who made large donations to Graham's political action organizations, has more than just financial connections to the senator from South Carolina. King spent almost 20 years as a senior worker in Graham's office, where he oversaw the office's Middle Eastern affairs among other things, before starting Neale Creek, his government relations and political consulting business. In addition to his own political donations, King is the treasurer and co-founder of 150 PAC, which has given thousands of dollars to Graham and other members of Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to materials submitted to the Department of Justice, King and Neale Creek engaged in \"the promotion of business with the State of Qatar\" by using the access that congressional offices provided them. Graham's native state of South Carolina has significant investments from Qatar. However, the DOJ's Foreign Agents Registration Act database does not contain the particular papers that were exchanged between Neale Creek and congressional representatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The impact of Neale Creek goes beyond Graham's workplace. The company has met with congressional sources in person, over the phone, over email, and through text messages, and has contributed close to $180,000 to members of Congress and related PACs since 2020. With almost $225,000 in donations made since 2020, Qatari foreign agents employed by Rubin Turnbull & Associates jointly made the largest contributions to political groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Communications from other companies representing Qatar provide some information, even if it may not be quite apparent what Neale Creek and King are saying to Congressmen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, documents disseminated by Qatari foreign agents employed by Venable minimize the Gulf state's ties to terrorist groups while highlighting what Qatar considers to be the benefits of investments made by its sovereign wealth fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

In recent years, this dynamic has been well demonstrated. According to a Washington Examiner analysis of hundreds of public records, Qatar's active foreign agents have given close to $700,000 to Congressmen and other government officials since 2020 while also having open channels of communication and face time with powerful lawmakers, frequently the same individuals they send checks to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to a 2018 scholarly study, when problems that are important to lobbyists are at the center of the political process, they boost their donations to certain committees and MPs. These lobbying payments may be driven by a desire to influence policy, as evidenced by another 2015 study that found that giving to a member of Congress improves access to their office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Andrew King, a Qatari foreign agent who made large donations to Graham's political action organizations, has more than just financial connections to the senator from South Carolina. King spent almost 20 years as a senior worker in Graham's office, where he oversaw the office's Middle Eastern affairs among other things, before starting Neale Creek, his government relations and political consulting business. In addition to his own political donations, King is the treasurer and co-founder of 150 PAC, which has given thousands of dollars to Graham and other members of Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to materials submitted to the Department of Justice, King and Neale Creek engaged in \"the promotion of business with the State of Qatar\" by using the access that congressional offices provided them. Graham's native state of South Carolina has significant investments from Qatar. However, the DOJ's Foreign Agents Registration Act database does not contain the particular papers that were exchanged between Neale Creek and congressional representatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The impact of Neale Creek goes beyond Graham's workplace. The company has met with congressional sources in person, over the phone, over email, and through text messages, and has contributed close to $180,000 to members of Congress and related PACs since 2020. With almost $225,000 in donations made since 2020, Qatari foreign agents employed by Rubin Turnbull & Associates jointly made the largest contributions to political groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Communications from other companies representing Qatar provide some information, even if it may not be quite apparent what Neale Creek and King are saying to Congressmen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, documents disseminated by Qatari foreign agents employed by Venable minimize the Gulf state's ties to terrorist groups while highlighting what Qatar considers to be the benefits of investments made by its sovereign wealth fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

A Qatari foreign agent contributed about $30,000 to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) campaign committees between 2020 and 2025. In order to support Qatar's interests<\/a>, Graham's office gave his lobbying business a lot of access during that time. This included more than 131 exchanges between the office and the agent, in-person meetings, and phone conversations with the senator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In recent years, this dynamic has been well demonstrated. According to a Washington Examiner analysis of hundreds of public records, Qatar's active foreign agents have given close to $700,000 to Congressmen and other government officials since 2020 while also having open channels of communication and face time with powerful lawmakers, frequently the same individuals they send checks to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to a 2018 scholarly study, when problems that are important to lobbyists are at the center of the political process, they boost their donations to certain committees and MPs. These lobbying payments may be driven by a desire to influence policy, as evidenced by another 2015 study that found that giving to a member of Congress improves access to their office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Andrew King, a Qatari foreign agent who made large donations to Graham's political action organizations, has more than just financial connections to the senator from South Carolina. King spent almost 20 years as a senior worker in Graham's office, where he oversaw the office's Middle Eastern affairs among other things, before starting Neale Creek, his government relations and political consulting business. In addition to his own political donations, King is the treasurer and co-founder of 150 PAC, which has given thousands of dollars to Graham and other members of Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to materials submitted to the Department of Justice, King and Neale Creek engaged in \"the promotion of business with the State of Qatar\" by using the access that congressional offices provided them. Graham's native state of South Carolina has significant investments from Qatar. However, the DOJ's Foreign Agents Registration Act database does not contain the particular papers that were exchanged between Neale Creek and congressional representatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The impact of Neale Creek goes beyond Graham's workplace. The company has met with congressional sources in person, over the phone, over email, and through text messages, and has contributed close to $180,000 to members of Congress and related PACs since 2020. With almost $225,000 in donations made since 2020, Qatari foreign agents employed by Rubin Turnbull & Associates jointly made the largest contributions to political groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Communications from other companies representing Qatar provide some information, even if it may not be quite apparent what Neale Creek and King are saying to Congressmen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, documents disseminated by Qatari foreign agents employed by Venable minimize the Gulf state's ties to terrorist groups while highlighting what Qatar considers to be the benefits of investments made by its sovereign wealth fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

The European Commission and European Parliament banned all Huawei lobbyists <\/a>from accessing the organisation\u2019s facilities in reaction to the controversy. Affiliates will be evaluated individually. Huawei stated it had no tolerance for corruption once the incident surfaced, but it hasn't released an official comment since. The Legal Affairs Committee of the EU Parliament will vote on withdrawing the immunity of the five lawmakers after the announcement on Wednesday.<\/p>\n","post_title":"EU integrity under pressure as Huawei-linked MEPs identified","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"eu-integrity-under-pressure-as-huawei-linked-meps-identified","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7849","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7842,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_content":"\n

A Qatari foreign agent contributed about $30,000 to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) campaign committees between 2020 and 2025. In order to support Qatar's interests<\/a>, Graham's office gave his lobbying business a lot of access during that time. This included more than 131 exchanges between the office and the agent, in-person meetings, and phone conversations with the senator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In recent years, this dynamic has been well demonstrated. According to a Washington Examiner analysis of hundreds of public records, Qatar's active foreign agents have given close to $700,000 to Congressmen and other government officials since 2020 while also having open channels of communication and face time with powerful lawmakers, frequently the same individuals they send checks to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to a 2018 scholarly study, when problems that are important to lobbyists are at the center of the political process, they boost their donations to certain committees and MPs. These lobbying payments may be driven by a desire to influence policy, as evidenced by another 2015 study that found that giving to a member of Congress improves access to their office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Andrew King, a Qatari foreign agent who made large donations to Graham's political action organizations, has more than just financial connections to the senator from South Carolina. King spent almost 20 years as a senior worker in Graham's office, where he oversaw the office's Middle Eastern affairs among other things, before starting Neale Creek, his government relations and political consulting business. In addition to his own political donations, King is the treasurer and co-founder of 150 PAC, which has given thousands of dollars to Graham and other members of Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to materials submitted to the Department of Justice, King and Neale Creek engaged in \"the promotion of business with the State of Qatar\" by using the access that congressional offices provided them. Graham's native state of South Carolina has significant investments from Qatar. However, the DOJ's Foreign Agents Registration Act database does not contain the particular papers that were exchanged between Neale Creek and congressional representatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The impact of Neale Creek goes beyond Graham's workplace. The company has met with congressional sources in person, over the phone, over email, and through text messages, and has contributed close to $180,000 to members of Congress and related PACs since 2020. With almost $225,000 in donations made since 2020, Qatari foreign agents employed by Rubin Turnbull & Associates jointly made the largest contributions to political groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Communications from other companies representing Qatar provide some information, even if it may not be quite apparent what Neale Creek and King are saying to Congressmen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, documents disseminated by Qatari foreign agents employed by Venable minimize the Gulf state's ties to terrorist groups while highlighting what Qatar considers to be the benefits of investments made by its sovereign wealth fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

he told the Bulgarian press. Adam Mukhtar, Minchev's assistant, had his office raided by authorities in the middle of March.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The European Commission and European Parliament banned all Huawei lobbyists <\/a>from accessing the organisation\u2019s facilities in reaction to the controversy. Affiliates will be evaluated individually. Huawei stated it had no tolerance for corruption once the incident surfaced, but it hasn't released an official comment since. The Legal Affairs Committee of the EU Parliament will vote on withdrawing the immunity of the five lawmakers after the announcement on Wednesday.<\/p>\n","post_title":"EU integrity under pressure as Huawei-linked MEPs identified","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"eu-integrity-under-pressure-as-huawei-linked-meps-identified","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7849","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7842,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_content":"\n

A Qatari foreign agent contributed about $30,000 to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) campaign committees between 2020 and 2025. In order to support Qatar's interests<\/a>, Graham's office gave his lobbying business a lot of access during that time. This included more than 131 exchanges between the office and the agent, in-person meetings, and phone conversations with the senator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In recent years, this dynamic has been well demonstrated. According to a Washington Examiner analysis of hundreds of public records, Qatar's active foreign agents have given close to $700,000 to Congressmen and other government officials since 2020 while also having open channels of communication and face time with powerful lawmakers, frequently the same individuals they send checks to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to a 2018 scholarly study, when problems that are important to lobbyists are at the center of the political process, they boost their donations to certain committees and MPs. These lobbying payments may be driven by a desire to influence policy, as evidenced by another 2015 study that found that giving to a member of Congress improves access to their office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Andrew King, a Qatari foreign agent who made large donations to Graham's political action organizations, has more than just financial connections to the senator from South Carolina. King spent almost 20 years as a senior worker in Graham's office, where he oversaw the office's Middle Eastern affairs among other things, before starting Neale Creek, his government relations and political consulting business. In addition to his own political donations, King is the treasurer and co-founder of 150 PAC, which has given thousands of dollars to Graham and other members of Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to materials submitted to the Department of Justice, King and Neale Creek engaged in \"the promotion of business with the State of Qatar\" by using the access that congressional offices provided them. Graham's native state of South Carolina has significant investments from Qatar. However, the DOJ's Foreign Agents Registration Act database does not contain the particular papers that were exchanged between Neale Creek and congressional representatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The impact of Neale Creek goes beyond Graham's workplace. The company has met with congressional sources in person, over the phone, over email, and through text messages, and has contributed close to $180,000 to members of Congress and related PACs since 2020. With almost $225,000 in donations made since 2020, Qatari foreign agents employed by Rubin Turnbull & Associates jointly made the largest contributions to political groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Communications from other companies representing Qatar provide some information, even if it may not be quite apparent what Neale Creek and King are saying to Congressmen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, documents disseminated by Qatari foreign agents employed by Venable minimize the Gulf state's ties to terrorist groups while highlighting what Qatar considers to be the benefits of investments made by its sovereign wealth fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

\"My presence at this event is now the reason for the management investigation into any potential issues or wrongdoing,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he told the Bulgarian press. Adam Mukhtar, Minchev's assistant, had his office raided by authorities in the middle of March.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The European Commission and European Parliament banned all Huawei lobbyists <\/a>from accessing the organisation\u2019s facilities in reaction to the controversy. Affiliates will be evaluated individually. Huawei stated it had no tolerance for corruption once the incident surfaced, but it hasn't released an official comment since. The Legal Affairs Committee of the EU Parliament will vote on withdrawing the immunity of the five lawmakers after the announcement on Wednesday.<\/p>\n","post_title":"EU integrity under pressure as Huawei-linked MEPs identified","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"eu-integrity-under-pressure-as-huawei-linked-meps-identified","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7849","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7842,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_content":"\n

A Qatari foreign agent contributed about $30,000 to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) campaign committees between 2020 and 2025. In order to support Qatar's interests<\/a>, Graham's office gave his lobbying business a lot of access during that time. This included more than 131 exchanges between the office and the agent, in-person meetings, and phone conversations with the senator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In recent years, this dynamic has been well demonstrated. According to a Washington Examiner analysis of hundreds of public records, Qatar's active foreign agents have given close to $700,000 to Congressmen and other government officials since 2020 while also having open channels of communication and face time with powerful lawmakers, frequently the same individuals they send checks to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to a 2018 scholarly study, when problems that are important to lobbyists are at the center of the political process, they boost their donations to certain committees and MPs. These lobbying payments may be driven by a desire to influence policy, as evidenced by another 2015 study that found that giving to a member of Congress improves access to their office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Andrew King, a Qatari foreign agent who made large donations to Graham's political action organizations, has more than just financial connections to the senator from South Carolina. King spent almost 20 years as a senior worker in Graham's office, where he oversaw the office's Middle Eastern affairs among other things, before starting Neale Creek, his government relations and political consulting business. In addition to his own political donations, King is the treasurer and co-founder of 150 PAC, which has given thousands of dollars to Graham and other members of Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to materials submitted to the Department of Justice, King and Neale Creek engaged in \"the promotion of business with the State of Qatar\" by using the access that congressional offices provided them. Graham's native state of South Carolina has significant investments from Qatar. However, the DOJ's Foreign Agents Registration Act database does not contain the particular papers that were exchanged between Neale Creek and congressional representatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The impact of Neale Creek goes beyond Graham's workplace. The company has met with congressional sources in person, over the phone, over email, and through text messages, and has contributed close to $180,000 to members of Congress and related PACs since 2020. With almost $225,000 in donations made since 2020, Qatari foreign agents employed by Rubin Turnbull & Associates jointly made the largest contributions to political groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Communications from other companies representing Qatar provide some information, even if it may not be quite apparent what Neale Creek and King are saying to Congressmen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, documents disseminated by Qatari foreign agents employed by Venable minimize the Gulf state's ties to terrorist groups while highlighting what Qatar considers to be the benefits of investments made by its sovereign wealth fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n
\n

\"My presence at this event is now the reason for the management investigation into any potential issues or wrongdoing,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he told the Bulgarian press. Adam Mukhtar, Minchev's assistant, had his office raided by authorities in the middle of March.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The European Commission and European Parliament banned all Huawei lobbyists <\/a>from accessing the organisation\u2019s facilities in reaction to the controversy. Affiliates will be evaluated individually. Huawei stated it had no tolerance for corruption once the incident surfaced, but it hasn't released an official comment since. The Legal Affairs Committee of the EU Parliament will vote on withdrawing the immunity of the five lawmakers after the announcement on Wednesday.<\/p>\n","post_title":"EU integrity under pressure as Huawei-linked MEPs identified","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"eu-integrity-under-pressure-as-huawei-linked-meps-identified","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7849","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7842,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_content":"\n

A Qatari foreign agent contributed about $30,000 to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) campaign committees between 2020 and 2025. In order to support Qatar's interests<\/a>, Graham's office gave his lobbying business a lot of access during that time. This included more than 131 exchanges between the office and the agent, in-person meetings, and phone conversations with the senator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In recent years, this dynamic has been well demonstrated. According to a Washington Examiner analysis of hundreds of public records, Qatar's active foreign agents have given close to $700,000 to Congressmen and other government officials since 2020 while also having open channels of communication and face time with powerful lawmakers, frequently the same individuals they send checks to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to a 2018 scholarly study, when problems that are important to lobbyists are at the center of the political process, they boost their donations to certain committees and MPs. These lobbying payments may be driven by a desire to influence policy, as evidenced by another 2015 study that found that giving to a member of Congress improves access to their office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Andrew King, a Qatari foreign agent who made large donations to Graham's political action organizations, has more than just financial connections to the senator from South Carolina. King spent almost 20 years as a senior worker in Graham's office, where he oversaw the office's Middle Eastern affairs among other things, before starting Neale Creek, his government relations and political consulting business. In addition to his own political donations, King is the treasurer and co-founder of 150 PAC, which has given thousands of dollars to Graham and other members of Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to materials submitted to the Department of Justice, King and Neale Creek engaged in \"the promotion of business with the State of Qatar\" by using the access that congressional offices provided them. Graham's native state of South Carolina has significant investments from Qatar. However, the DOJ's Foreign Agents Registration Act database does not contain the particular papers that were exchanged between Neale Creek and congressional representatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The impact of Neale Creek goes beyond Graham's workplace. The company has met with congressional sources in person, over the phone, over email, and through text messages, and has contributed close to $180,000 to members of Congress and related PACs since 2020. With almost $225,000 in donations made since 2020, Qatari foreign agents employed by Rubin Turnbull & Associates jointly made the largest contributions to political groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Communications from other companies representing Qatar provide some information, even if it may not be quite apparent what Neale Creek and King are saying to Congressmen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, documents disseminated by Qatari foreign agents employed by Venable minimize the Gulf state's ties to terrorist groups while highlighting what Qatar considers to be the benefits of investments made by its sovereign wealth fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Minchev, a Bulgarian Renew MEP, is also being investigated for going<\/a> to Huawei's box during a football game in Anderlecht. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"My presence at this event is now the reason for the management investigation into any potential issues or wrongdoing,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he told the Bulgarian press. Adam Mukhtar, Minchev's assistant, had his office raided by authorities in the middle of March.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The European Commission and European Parliament banned all Huawei lobbyists <\/a>from accessing the organisation\u2019s facilities in reaction to the controversy. Affiliates will be evaluated individually. Huawei stated it had no tolerance for corruption once the incident surfaced, but it hasn't released an official comment since. The Legal Affairs Committee of the EU Parliament will vote on withdrawing the immunity of the five lawmakers after the announcement on Wednesday.<\/p>\n","post_title":"EU integrity under pressure as Huawei-linked MEPs identified","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"eu-integrity-under-pressure-as-huawei-linked-meps-identified","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7849","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7842,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_content":"\n

A Qatari foreign agent contributed about $30,000 to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) campaign committees between 2020 and 2025. In order to support Qatar's interests<\/a>, Graham's office gave his lobbying business a lot of access during that time. This included more than 131 exchanges between the office and the agent, in-person meetings, and phone conversations with the senator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In recent years, this dynamic has been well demonstrated. According to a Washington Examiner analysis of hundreds of public records, Qatar's active foreign agents have given close to $700,000 to Congressmen and other government officials since 2020 while also having open channels of communication and face time with powerful lawmakers, frequently the same individuals they send checks to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to a 2018 scholarly study, when problems that are important to lobbyists are at the center of the political process, they boost their donations to certain committees and MPs. These lobbying payments may be driven by a desire to influence policy, as evidenced by another 2015 study that found that giving to a member of Congress improves access to their office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Andrew King, a Qatari foreign agent who made large donations to Graham's political action organizations, has more than just financial connections to the senator from South Carolina. King spent almost 20 years as a senior worker in Graham's office, where he oversaw the office's Middle Eastern affairs among other things, before starting Neale Creek, his government relations and political consulting business. In addition to his own political donations, King is the treasurer and co-founder of 150 PAC, which has given thousands of dollars to Graham and other members of Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to materials submitted to the Department of Justice, King and Neale Creek engaged in \"the promotion of business with the State of Qatar\" by using the access that congressional offices provided them. Graham's native state of South Carolina has significant investments from Qatar. However, the DOJ's Foreign Agents Registration Act database does not contain the particular papers that were exchanged between Neale Creek and congressional representatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The impact of Neale Creek goes beyond Graham's workplace. The company has met with congressional sources in person, over the phone, over email, and through text messages, and has contributed close to $180,000 to members of Congress and related PACs since 2020. With almost $225,000 in donations made since 2020, Qatari foreign agents employed by Rubin Turnbull & Associates jointly made the largest contributions to political groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Communications from other companies representing Qatar provide some information, even if it may not be quite apparent what Neale Creek and King are saying to Congressmen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, documents disseminated by Qatari foreign agents employed by Venable minimize the Gulf state's ties to terrorist groups while highlighting what Qatar considers to be the benefits of investments made by its sovereign wealth fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

he stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Minchev, a Bulgarian Renew MEP, is also being investigated for going<\/a> to Huawei's box during a football game in Anderlecht. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"My presence at this event is now the reason for the management investigation into any potential issues or wrongdoing,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he told the Bulgarian press. Adam Mukhtar, Minchev's assistant, had his office raided by authorities in the middle of March.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The European Commission and European Parliament banned all Huawei lobbyists <\/a>from accessing the organisation\u2019s facilities in reaction to the controversy. Affiliates will be evaluated individually. Huawei stated it had no tolerance for corruption once the incident surfaced, but it hasn't released an official comment since. The Legal Affairs Committee of the EU Parliament will vote on withdrawing the immunity of the five lawmakers after the announcement on Wednesday.<\/p>\n","post_title":"EU integrity under pressure as Huawei-linked MEPs identified","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"eu-integrity-under-pressure-as-huawei-linked-meps-identified","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7849","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7842,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_content":"\n

A Qatari foreign agent contributed about $30,000 to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) campaign committees between 2020 and 2025. In order to support Qatar's interests<\/a>, Graham's office gave his lobbying business a lot of access during that time. This included more than 131 exchanges between the office and the agent, in-person meetings, and phone conversations with the senator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In recent years, this dynamic has been well demonstrated. According to a Washington Examiner analysis of hundreds of public records, Qatar's active foreign agents have given close to $700,000 to Congressmen and other government officials since 2020 while also having open channels of communication and face time with powerful lawmakers, frequently the same individuals they send checks to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to a 2018 scholarly study, when problems that are important to lobbyists are at the center of the political process, they boost their donations to certain committees and MPs. These lobbying payments may be driven by a desire to influence policy, as evidenced by another 2015 study that found that giving to a member of Congress improves access to their office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Andrew King, a Qatari foreign agent who made large donations to Graham's political action organizations, has more than just financial connections to the senator from South Carolina. King spent almost 20 years as a senior worker in Graham's office, where he oversaw the office's Middle Eastern affairs among other things, before starting Neale Creek, his government relations and political consulting business. In addition to his own political donations, King is the treasurer and co-founder of 150 PAC, which has given thousands of dollars to Graham and other members of Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to materials submitted to the Department of Justice, King and Neale Creek engaged in \"the promotion of business with the State of Qatar\" by using the access that congressional offices provided them. Graham's native state of South Carolina has significant investments from Qatar. However, the DOJ's Foreign Agents Registration Act database does not contain the particular papers that were exchanged between Neale Creek and congressional representatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The impact of Neale Creek goes beyond Graham's workplace. The company has met with congressional sources in person, over the phone, over email, and through text messages, and has contributed close to $180,000 to members of Congress and related PACs since 2020. With almost $225,000 in donations made since 2020, Qatari foreign agents employed by Rubin Turnbull & Associates jointly made the largest contributions to political groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Communications from other companies representing Qatar provide some information, even if it may not be quite apparent what Neale Creek and King are saying to Congressmen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, documents disseminated by Qatari foreign agents employed by Venable minimize the Gulf state's ties to terrorist groups while highlighting what Qatar considers to be the benefits of investments made by its sovereign wealth fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

\"I was unaware that the invitation originated from a company or that it pertained to a corporate box. Subsequently, it became evident that the invitation was from an individual under investigation by the Belgian authorities, who aimed to discuss Huawei with me during the match,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Minchev, a Bulgarian Renew MEP, is also being investigated for going<\/a> to Huawei's box during a football game in Anderlecht. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"My presence at this event is now the reason for the management investigation into any potential issues or wrongdoing,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he told the Bulgarian press. Adam Mukhtar, Minchev's assistant, had his office raided by authorities in the middle of March.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The European Commission and European Parliament banned all Huawei lobbyists <\/a>from accessing the organisation\u2019s facilities in reaction to the controversy. Affiliates will be evaluated individually. Huawei stated it had no tolerance for corruption once the incident surfaced, but it hasn't released an official comment since. The Legal Affairs Committee of the EU Parliament will vote on withdrawing the immunity of the five lawmakers after the announcement on Wednesday.<\/p>\n","post_title":"EU integrity under pressure as Huawei-linked MEPs identified","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"eu-integrity-under-pressure-as-huawei-linked-meps-identified","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7849","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7842,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_content":"\n

A Qatari foreign agent contributed about $30,000 to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) campaign committees between 2020 and 2025. In order to support Qatar's interests<\/a>, Graham's office gave his lobbying business a lot of access during that time. This included more than 131 exchanges between the office and the agent, in-person meetings, and phone conversations with the senator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In recent years, this dynamic has been well demonstrated. According to a Washington Examiner analysis of hundreds of public records, Qatar's active foreign agents have given close to $700,000 to Congressmen and other government officials since 2020 while also having open channels of communication and face time with powerful lawmakers, frequently the same individuals they send checks to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to a 2018 scholarly study, when problems that are important to lobbyists are at the center of the political process, they boost their donations to certain committees and MPs. These lobbying payments may be driven by a desire to influence policy, as evidenced by another 2015 study that found that giving to a member of Congress improves access to their office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Andrew King, a Qatari foreign agent who made large donations to Graham's political action organizations, has more than just financial connections to the senator from South Carolina. King spent almost 20 years as a senior worker in Graham's office, where he oversaw the office's Middle Eastern affairs among other things, before starting Neale Creek, his government relations and political consulting business. In addition to his own political donations, King is the treasurer and co-founder of 150 PAC, which has given thousands of dollars to Graham and other members of Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to materials submitted to the Department of Justice, King and Neale Creek engaged in \"the promotion of business with the State of Qatar\" by using the access that congressional offices provided them. Graham's native state of South Carolina has significant investments from Qatar. However, the DOJ's Foreign Agents Registration Act database does not contain the particular papers that were exchanged between Neale Creek and congressional representatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The impact of Neale Creek goes beyond Graham's workplace. The company has met with congressional sources in person, over the phone, over email, and through text messages, and has contributed close to $180,000 to members of Congress and related PACs since 2020. With almost $225,000 in donations made since 2020, Qatari foreign agents employed by Rubin Turnbull & Associates jointly made the largest contributions to political groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Communications from other companies representing Qatar provide some information, even if it may not be quite apparent what Neale Creek and King are saying to Congressmen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, documents disseminated by Qatari foreign agents employed by Venable minimize the Gulf state's ties to terrorist groups while highlighting what Qatar considers to be the benefits of investments made by its sovereign wealth fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n
\n

\"I was unaware that the invitation originated from a company or that it pertained to a corporate box. Subsequently, it became evident that the invitation was from an individual under investigation by the Belgian authorities, who aimed to discuss Huawei with me during the match,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Minchev, a Bulgarian Renew MEP, is also being investigated for going<\/a> to Huawei's box during a football game in Anderlecht. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"My presence at this event is now the reason for the management investigation into any potential issues or wrongdoing,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he told the Bulgarian press. Adam Mukhtar, Minchev's assistant, had his office raided by authorities in the middle of March.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The European Commission and European Parliament banned all Huawei lobbyists <\/a>from accessing the organisation\u2019s facilities in reaction to the controversy. Affiliates will be evaluated individually. Huawei stated it had no tolerance for corruption once the incident surfaced, but it hasn't released an official comment since. The Legal Affairs Committee of the EU Parliament will vote on withdrawing the immunity of the five lawmakers after the announcement on Wednesday.<\/p>\n","post_title":"EU integrity under pressure as Huawei-linked MEPs identified","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"eu-integrity-under-pressure-as-huawei-linked-meps-identified","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7849","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7842,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_content":"\n

A Qatari foreign agent contributed about $30,000 to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) campaign committees between 2020 and 2025. In order to support Qatar's interests<\/a>, Graham's office gave his lobbying business a lot of access during that time. This included more than 131 exchanges between the office and the agent, in-person meetings, and phone conversations with the senator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In recent years, this dynamic has been well demonstrated. According to a Washington Examiner analysis of hundreds of public records, Qatar's active foreign agents have given close to $700,000 to Congressmen and other government officials since 2020 while also having open channels of communication and face time with powerful lawmakers, frequently the same individuals they send checks to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to a 2018 scholarly study, when problems that are important to lobbyists are at the center of the political process, they boost their donations to certain committees and MPs. These lobbying payments may be driven by a desire to influence policy, as evidenced by another 2015 study that found that giving to a member of Congress improves access to their office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Andrew King, a Qatari foreign agent who made large donations to Graham's political action organizations, has more than just financial connections to the senator from South Carolina. King spent almost 20 years as a senior worker in Graham's office, where he oversaw the office's Middle Eastern affairs among other things, before starting Neale Creek, his government relations and political consulting business. In addition to his own political donations, King is the treasurer and co-founder of 150 PAC, which has given thousands of dollars to Graham and other members of Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to materials submitted to the Department of Justice, King and Neale Creek engaged in \"the promotion of business with the State of Qatar\" by using the access that congressional offices provided them. Graham's native state of South Carolina has significant investments from Qatar. However, the DOJ's Foreign Agents Registration Act database does not contain the particular papers that were exchanged between Neale Creek and congressional representatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The impact of Neale Creek goes beyond Graham's workplace. The company has met with congressional sources in person, over the phone, over email, and through text messages, and has contributed close to $180,000 to members of Congress and related PACs since 2020. With almost $225,000 in donations made since 2020, Qatari foreign agents employed by Rubin Turnbull & Associates jointly made the largest contributions to political groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Communications from other companies representing Qatar provide some information, even if it may not be quite apparent what Neale Creek and King are saying to Congressmen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, documents disseminated by Qatari foreign agents employed by Venable minimize the Gulf state's ties to terrorist groups while highlighting what Qatar considers to be the benefits of investments made by its sovereign wealth fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

The issue involving Maltese Labour MEP Daniel Attard pertains to a football game he watched in September from Huawei\u2019s box seats at the Anderlecht stadium in Belgium. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I was unaware that the invitation originated from a company or that it pertained to a corporate box. Subsequently, it became evident that the invitation was from an individual under investigation by the Belgian authorities, who aimed to discuss Huawei with me during the match,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Minchev, a Bulgarian Renew MEP, is also being investigated for going<\/a> to Huawei's box during a football game in Anderlecht. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"My presence at this event is now the reason for the management investigation into any potential issues or wrongdoing,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he told the Bulgarian press. Adam Mukhtar, Minchev's assistant, had his office raided by authorities in the middle of March.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The European Commission and European Parliament banned all Huawei lobbyists <\/a>from accessing the organisation\u2019s facilities in reaction to the controversy. Affiliates will be evaluated individually. Huawei stated it had no tolerance for corruption once the incident surfaced, but it hasn't released an official comment since. The Legal Affairs Committee of the EU Parliament will vote on withdrawing the immunity of the five lawmakers after the announcement on Wednesday.<\/p>\n","post_title":"EU integrity under pressure as Huawei-linked MEPs identified","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"eu-integrity-under-pressure-as-huawei-linked-meps-identified","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7849","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7842,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_content":"\n

A Qatari foreign agent contributed about $30,000 to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) campaign committees between 2020 and 2025. In order to support Qatar's interests<\/a>, Graham's office gave his lobbying business a lot of access during that time. This included more than 131 exchanges between the office and the agent, in-person meetings, and phone conversations with the senator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In recent years, this dynamic has been well demonstrated. According to a Washington Examiner analysis of hundreds of public records, Qatar's active foreign agents have given close to $700,000 to Congressmen and other government officials since 2020 while also having open channels of communication and face time with powerful lawmakers, frequently the same individuals they send checks to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to a 2018 scholarly study, when problems that are important to lobbyists are at the center of the political process, they boost their donations to certain committees and MPs. These lobbying payments may be driven by a desire to influence policy, as evidenced by another 2015 study that found that giving to a member of Congress improves access to their office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Andrew King, a Qatari foreign agent who made large donations to Graham's political action organizations, has more than just financial connections to the senator from South Carolina. King spent almost 20 years as a senior worker in Graham's office, where he oversaw the office's Middle Eastern affairs among other things, before starting Neale Creek, his government relations and political consulting business. In addition to his own political donations, King is the treasurer and co-founder of 150 PAC, which has given thousands of dollars to Graham and other members of Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to materials submitted to the Department of Justice, King and Neale Creek engaged in \"the promotion of business with the State of Qatar\" by using the access that congressional offices provided them. Graham's native state of South Carolina has significant investments from Qatar. However, the DOJ's Foreign Agents Registration Act database does not contain the particular papers that were exchanged between Neale Creek and congressional representatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The impact of Neale Creek goes beyond Graham's workplace. The company has met with congressional sources in person, over the phone, over email, and through text messages, and has contributed close to $180,000 to members of Congress and related PACs since 2020. With almost $225,000 in donations made since 2020, Qatari foreign agents employed by Rubin Turnbull & Associates jointly made the largest contributions to political groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Communications from other companies representing Qatar provide some information, even if it may not be quite apparent what Neale Creek and King are saying to Congressmen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, documents disseminated by Qatari foreign agents employed by Venable minimize the Gulf state's ties to terrorist groups while highlighting what Qatar considers to be the benefits of investments made by its sovereign wealth fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Prior to the revelation, De Meo, Attard, and Minchev\u2014the three MEPs who had gone public\u2014all denied any misconduct. According to De Meo, his issue concerns attending an aperitif, a social event that was not planned by Huawei. Representatives from the Huawei group were also present at the event, which was held outside the European Parliament.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The issue involving Maltese Labour MEP Daniel Attard pertains to a football game he watched in September from Huawei\u2019s box seats at the Anderlecht stadium in Belgium. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I was unaware that the invitation originated from a company or that it pertained to a corporate box. Subsequently, it became evident that the invitation was from an individual under investigation by the Belgian authorities, who aimed to discuss Huawei with me during the match,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Minchev, a Bulgarian Renew MEP, is also being investigated for going<\/a> to Huawei's box during a football game in Anderlecht. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"My presence at this event is now the reason for the management investigation into any potential issues or wrongdoing,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he told the Bulgarian press. Adam Mukhtar, Minchev's assistant, had his office raided by authorities in the middle of March.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The European Commission and European Parliament banned all Huawei lobbyists <\/a>from accessing the organisation\u2019s facilities in reaction to the controversy. Affiliates will be evaluated individually. Huawei stated it had no tolerance for corruption once the incident surfaced, but it hasn't released an official comment since. The Legal Affairs Committee of the EU Parliament will vote on withdrawing the immunity of the five lawmakers after the announcement on Wednesday.<\/p>\n","post_title":"EU integrity under pressure as Huawei-linked MEPs identified","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"eu-integrity-under-pressure-as-huawei-linked-meps-identified","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7849","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7842,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_content":"\n

A Qatari foreign agent contributed about $30,000 to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) campaign committees between 2020 and 2025. In order to support Qatar's interests<\/a>, Graham's office gave his lobbying business a lot of access during that time. This included more than 131 exchanges between the office and the agent, in-person meetings, and phone conversations with the senator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In recent years, this dynamic has been well demonstrated. According to a Washington Examiner analysis of hundreds of public records, Qatar's active foreign agents have given close to $700,000 to Congressmen and other government officials since 2020 while also having open channels of communication and face time with powerful lawmakers, frequently the same individuals they send checks to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to a 2018 scholarly study, when problems that are important to lobbyists are at the center of the political process, they boost their donations to certain committees and MPs. These lobbying payments may be driven by a desire to influence policy, as evidenced by another 2015 study that found that giving to a member of Congress improves access to their office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Andrew King, a Qatari foreign agent who made large donations to Graham's political action organizations, has more than just financial connections to the senator from South Carolina. King spent almost 20 years as a senior worker in Graham's office, where he oversaw the office's Middle Eastern affairs among other things, before starting Neale Creek, his government relations and political consulting business. In addition to his own political donations, King is the treasurer and co-founder of 150 PAC, which has given thousands of dollars to Graham and other members of Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to materials submitted to the Department of Justice, King and Neale Creek engaged in \"the promotion of business with the State of Qatar\" by using the access that congressional offices provided them. Graham's native state of South Carolina has significant investments from Qatar. However, the DOJ's Foreign Agents Registration Act database does not contain the particular papers that were exchanged between Neale Creek and congressional representatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The impact of Neale Creek goes beyond Graham's workplace. The company has met with congressional sources in person, over the phone, over email, and through text messages, and has contributed close to $180,000 to members of Congress and related PACs since 2020. With almost $225,000 in donations made since 2020, Qatari foreign agents employed by Rubin Turnbull & Associates jointly made the largest contributions to political groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Communications from other companies representing Qatar provide some information, even if it may not be quite apparent what Neale Creek and King are saying to Congressmen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, documents disseminated by Qatari foreign agents employed by Venable minimize the Gulf state's ties to terrorist groups while highlighting what Qatar considers to be the benefits of investments made by its sovereign wealth fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

It was disclosed earlier this week that as part of a probe into Huawei's cash-for-influence operation in Brussels, Belgian prosecutors had asked the European Parliament to revoke the immunity of the five MEPs without identifying them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Prior to the revelation, De Meo, Attard, and Minchev\u2014the three MEPs who had gone public\u2014all denied any misconduct. According to De Meo, his issue concerns attending an aperitif, a social event that was not planned by Huawei. Representatives from the Huawei group were also present at the event, which was held outside the European Parliament.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The issue involving Maltese Labour MEP Daniel Attard pertains to a football game he watched in September from Huawei\u2019s box seats at the Anderlecht stadium in Belgium. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I was unaware that the invitation originated from a company or that it pertained to a corporate box. Subsequently, it became evident that the invitation was from an individual under investigation by the Belgian authorities, who aimed to discuss Huawei with me during the match,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Minchev, a Bulgarian Renew MEP, is also being investigated for going<\/a> to Huawei's box during a football game in Anderlecht. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"My presence at this event is now the reason for the management investigation into any potential issues or wrongdoing,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he told the Bulgarian press. Adam Mukhtar, Minchev's assistant, had his office raided by authorities in the middle of March.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The European Commission and European Parliament banned all Huawei lobbyists <\/a>from accessing the organisation\u2019s facilities in reaction to the controversy. Affiliates will be evaluated individually. Huawei stated it had no tolerance for corruption once the incident surfaced, but it hasn't released an official comment since. The Legal Affairs Committee of the EU Parliament will vote on withdrawing the immunity of the five lawmakers after the announcement on Wednesday.<\/p>\n","post_title":"EU integrity under pressure as Huawei-linked MEPs identified","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"eu-integrity-under-pressure-as-huawei-linked-meps-identified","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7849","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7842,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_content":"\n

A Qatari foreign agent contributed about $30,000 to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) campaign committees between 2020 and 2025. In order to support Qatar's interests<\/a>, Graham's office gave his lobbying business a lot of access during that time. This included more than 131 exchanges between the office and the agent, in-person meetings, and phone conversations with the senator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In recent years, this dynamic has been well demonstrated. According to a Washington Examiner analysis of hundreds of public records, Qatar's active foreign agents have given close to $700,000 to Congressmen and other government officials since 2020 while also having open channels of communication and face time with powerful lawmakers, frequently the same individuals they send checks to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to a 2018 scholarly study, when problems that are important to lobbyists are at the center of the political process, they boost their donations to certain committees and MPs. These lobbying payments may be driven by a desire to influence policy, as evidenced by another 2015 study that found that giving to a member of Congress improves access to their office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Andrew King, a Qatari foreign agent who made large donations to Graham's political action organizations, has more than just financial connections to the senator from South Carolina. King spent almost 20 years as a senior worker in Graham's office, where he oversaw the office's Middle Eastern affairs among other things, before starting Neale Creek, his government relations and political consulting business. In addition to his own political donations, King is the treasurer and co-founder of 150 PAC, which has given thousands of dollars to Graham and other members of Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to materials submitted to the Department of Justice, King and Neale Creek engaged in \"the promotion of business with the State of Qatar\" by using the access that congressional offices provided them. Graham's native state of South Carolina has significant investments from Qatar. However, the DOJ's Foreign Agents Registration Act database does not contain the particular papers that were exchanged between Neale Creek and congressional representatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The impact of Neale Creek goes beyond Graham's workplace. The company has met with congressional sources in person, over the phone, over email, and through text messages, and has contributed close to $180,000 to members of Congress and related PACs since 2020. With almost $225,000 in donations made since 2020, Qatari foreign agents employed by Rubin Turnbull & Associates jointly made the largest contributions to political groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Communications from other companies representing Qatar provide some information, even if it may not be quite apparent what Neale Creek and King are saying to Congressmen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, documents disseminated by Qatari foreign agents employed by Venable minimize the Gulf state's ties to terrorist groups while highlighting what Qatar considers to be the benefits of investments made by its sovereign wealth fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

According to investigators, Huawei's lobbyists may have influenced lawmakers with unreported gifts and payments, such as free sports tickets, expensive presents, sizable cash transfers, and even all-expense-paid vacations to China, in return for backing for the Chinese business.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It was disclosed earlier this week that as part of a probe into Huawei's cash-for-influence operation in Brussels, Belgian prosecutors had asked the European Parliament to revoke the immunity of the five MEPs without identifying them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Prior to the revelation, De Meo, Attard, and Minchev\u2014the three MEPs who had gone public\u2014all denied any misconduct. According to De Meo, his issue concerns attending an aperitif, a social event that was not planned by Huawei. Representatives from the Huawei group were also present at the event, which was held outside the European Parliament.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The issue involving Maltese Labour MEP Daniel Attard pertains to a football game he watched in September from Huawei\u2019s box seats at the Anderlecht stadium in Belgium. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I was unaware that the invitation originated from a company or that it pertained to a corporate box. Subsequently, it became evident that the invitation was from an individual under investigation by the Belgian authorities, who aimed to discuss Huawei with me during the match,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Minchev, a Bulgarian Renew MEP, is also being investigated for going<\/a> to Huawei's box during a football game in Anderlecht. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"My presence at this event is now the reason for the management investigation into any potential issues or wrongdoing,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he told the Bulgarian press. Adam Mukhtar, Minchev's assistant, had his office raided by authorities in the middle of March.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The European Commission and European Parliament banned all Huawei lobbyists <\/a>from accessing the organisation\u2019s facilities in reaction to the controversy. Affiliates will be evaluated individually. Huawei stated it had no tolerance for corruption once the incident surfaced, but it hasn't released an official comment since. The Legal Affairs Committee of the EU Parliament will vote on withdrawing the immunity of the five lawmakers after the announcement on Wednesday.<\/p>\n","post_title":"EU integrity under pressure as Huawei-linked MEPs identified","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"eu-integrity-under-pressure-as-huawei-linked-meps-identified","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7849","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7842,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_content":"\n

A Qatari foreign agent contributed about $30,000 to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) campaign committees between 2020 and 2025. In order to support Qatar's interests<\/a>, Graham's office gave his lobbying business a lot of access during that time. This included more than 131 exchanges between the office and the agent, in-person meetings, and phone conversations with the senator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In recent years, this dynamic has been well demonstrated. According to a Washington Examiner analysis of hundreds of public records, Qatar's active foreign agents have given close to $700,000 to Congressmen and other government officials since 2020 while also having open channels of communication and face time with powerful lawmakers, frequently the same individuals they send checks to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to a 2018 scholarly study, when problems that are important to lobbyists are at the center of the political process, they boost their donations to certain committees and MPs. These lobbying payments may be driven by a desire to influence policy, as evidenced by another 2015 study that found that giving to a member of Congress improves access to their office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Andrew King, a Qatari foreign agent who made large donations to Graham's political action organizations, has more than just financial connections to the senator from South Carolina. King spent almost 20 years as a senior worker in Graham's office, where he oversaw the office's Middle Eastern affairs among other things, before starting Neale Creek, his government relations and political consulting business. In addition to his own political donations, King is the treasurer and co-founder of 150 PAC, which has given thousands of dollars to Graham and other members of Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to materials submitted to the Department of Justice, King and Neale Creek engaged in \"the promotion of business with the State of Qatar\" by using the access that congressional offices provided them. Graham's native state of South Carolina has significant investments from Qatar. However, the DOJ's Foreign Agents Registration Act database does not contain the particular papers that were exchanged between Neale Creek and congressional representatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The impact of Neale Creek goes beyond Graham's workplace. The company has met with congressional sources in person, over the phone, over email, and through text messages, and has contributed close to $180,000 to members of Congress and related PACs since 2020. With almost $225,000 in donations made since 2020, Qatari foreign agents employed by Rubin Turnbull & Associates jointly made the largest contributions to political groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Communications from other companies representing Qatar provide some information, even if it may not be quite apparent what Neale Creek and King are saying to Congressmen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, documents disseminated by Qatari foreign agents employed by Venable minimize the Gulf state's ties to terrorist groups while highlighting what Qatar considers to be the benefits of investments made by its sovereign wealth fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Eight persons have been taken into custody as a result of the inquiry thus far. These include lobbyists and Lawmakers assistants, as well as present and former Huawei workers. Although no MEPs have been taken into custody as of yet, Martusciello's name was anticipated following the arrest of his parliamentary aide in Italy in April.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to investigators, Huawei's lobbyists may have influenced lawmakers with unreported gifts and payments, such as free sports tickets, expensive presents, sizable cash transfers, and even all-expense-paid vacations to China, in return for backing for the Chinese business.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It was disclosed earlier this week that as part of a probe into Huawei's cash-for-influence operation in Brussels, Belgian prosecutors had asked the European Parliament to revoke the immunity of the five MEPs without identifying them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Prior to the revelation, De Meo, Attard, and Minchev\u2014the three MEPs who had gone public\u2014all denied any misconduct. According to De Meo, his issue concerns attending an aperitif, a social event that was not planned by Huawei. Representatives from the Huawei group were also present at the event, which was held outside the European Parliament.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The issue involving Maltese Labour MEP Daniel Attard pertains to a football game he watched in September from Huawei\u2019s box seats at the Anderlecht stadium in Belgium. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I was unaware that the invitation originated from a company or that it pertained to a corporate box. Subsequently, it became evident that the invitation was from an individual under investigation by the Belgian authorities, who aimed to discuss Huawei with me during the match,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Minchev, a Bulgarian Renew MEP, is also being investigated for going<\/a> to Huawei's box during a football game in Anderlecht. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"My presence at this event is now the reason for the management investigation into any potential issues or wrongdoing,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he told the Bulgarian press. Adam Mukhtar, Minchev's assistant, had his office raided by authorities in the middle of March.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The European Commission and European Parliament banned all Huawei lobbyists <\/a>from accessing the organisation\u2019s facilities in reaction to the controversy. Affiliates will be evaluated individually. Huawei stated it had no tolerance for corruption once the incident surfaced, but it hasn't released an official comment since. The Legal Affairs Committee of the EU Parliament will vote on withdrawing the immunity of the five lawmakers after the announcement on Wednesday.<\/p>\n","post_title":"EU integrity under pressure as Huawei-linked MEPs identified","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"eu-integrity-under-pressure-as-huawei-linked-meps-identified","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7849","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7842,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_content":"\n

A Qatari foreign agent contributed about $30,000 to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) campaign committees between 2020 and 2025. In order to support Qatar's interests<\/a>, Graham's office gave his lobbying business a lot of access during that time. This included more than 131 exchanges between the office and the agent, in-person meetings, and phone conversations with the senator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In recent years, this dynamic has been well demonstrated. According to a Washington Examiner analysis of hundreds of public records, Qatar's active foreign agents have given close to $700,000 to Congressmen and other government officials since 2020 while also having open channels of communication and face time with powerful lawmakers, frequently the same individuals they send checks to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to a 2018 scholarly study, when problems that are important to lobbyists are at the center of the political process, they boost their donations to certain committees and MPs. These lobbying payments may be driven by a desire to influence policy, as evidenced by another 2015 study that found that giving to a member of Congress improves access to their office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Andrew King, a Qatari foreign agent who made large donations to Graham's political action organizations, has more than just financial connections to the senator from South Carolina. King spent almost 20 years as a senior worker in Graham's office, where he oversaw the office's Middle Eastern affairs among other things, before starting Neale Creek, his government relations and political consulting business. In addition to his own political donations, King is the treasurer and co-founder of 150 PAC, which has given thousands of dollars to Graham and other members of Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to materials submitted to the Department of Justice, King and Neale Creek engaged in \"the promotion of business with the State of Qatar\" by using the access that congressional offices provided them. Graham's native state of South Carolina has significant investments from Qatar. However, the DOJ's Foreign Agents Registration Act database does not contain the particular papers that were exchanged between Neale Creek and congressional representatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The impact of Neale Creek goes beyond Graham's workplace. The company has met with congressional sources in person, over the phone, over email, and through text messages, and has contributed close to $180,000 to members of Congress and related PACs since 2020. With almost $225,000 in donations made since 2020, Qatari foreign agents employed by Rubin Turnbull & Associates jointly made the largest contributions to political groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Communications from other companies representing Qatar provide some information, even if it may not be quite apparent what Neale Creek and King are saying to Congressmen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, documents disseminated by Qatari foreign agents employed by Venable minimize the Gulf state's ties to terrorist groups while highlighting what Qatar considers to be the benefits of investments made by its sovereign wealth fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Metsola also mentioned three additional EU parliamentarians who had acknowledged earlier this week that Belgian officials had approached them. MEPs Daniel Attard, Nikola Minchev, and Salvatore de Meo were among them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Eight persons have been taken into custody as a result of the inquiry thus far. These include lobbyists and Lawmakers assistants, as well as present and former Huawei workers. Although no MEPs have been taken into custody as of yet, Martusciello's name was anticipated following the arrest of his parliamentary aide in Italy in April.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to investigators, Huawei's lobbyists may have influenced lawmakers with unreported gifts and payments, such as free sports tickets, expensive presents, sizable cash transfers, and even all-expense-paid vacations to China, in return for backing for the Chinese business.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It was disclosed earlier this week that as part of a probe into Huawei's cash-for-influence operation in Brussels, Belgian prosecutors had asked the European Parliament to revoke the immunity of the five MEPs without identifying them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Prior to the revelation, De Meo, Attard, and Minchev\u2014the three MEPs who had gone public\u2014all denied any misconduct. According to De Meo, his issue concerns attending an aperitif, a social event that was not planned by Huawei. Representatives from the Huawei group were also present at the event, which was held outside the European Parliament.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The issue involving Maltese Labour MEP Daniel Attard pertains to a football game he watched in September from Huawei\u2019s box seats at the Anderlecht stadium in Belgium. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I was unaware that the invitation originated from a company or that it pertained to a corporate box. Subsequently, it became evident that the invitation was from an individual under investigation by the Belgian authorities, who aimed to discuss Huawei with me during the match,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Minchev, a Bulgarian Renew MEP, is also being investigated for going<\/a> to Huawei's box during a football game in Anderlecht. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"My presence at this event is now the reason for the management investigation into any potential issues or wrongdoing,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he told the Bulgarian press. Adam Mukhtar, Minchev's assistant, had his office raided by authorities in the middle of March.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The European Commission and European Parliament banned all Huawei lobbyists <\/a>from accessing the organisation\u2019s facilities in reaction to the controversy. Affiliates will be evaluated individually. Huawei stated it had no tolerance for corruption once the incident surfaced, but it hasn't released an official comment since. The Legal Affairs Committee of the EU Parliament will vote on withdrawing the immunity of the five lawmakers after the announcement on Wednesday.<\/p>\n","post_title":"EU integrity under pressure as Huawei-linked MEPs identified","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"eu-integrity-under-pressure-as-huawei-linked-meps-identified","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7849","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7842,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_content":"\n

A Qatari foreign agent contributed about $30,000 to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) campaign committees between 2020 and 2025. In order to support Qatar's interests<\/a>, Graham's office gave his lobbying business a lot of access during that time. This included more than 131 exchanges between the office and the agent, in-person meetings, and phone conversations with the senator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In recent years, this dynamic has been well demonstrated. According to a Washington Examiner analysis of hundreds of public records, Qatar's active foreign agents have given close to $700,000 to Congressmen and other government officials since 2020 while also having open channels of communication and face time with powerful lawmakers, frequently the same individuals they send checks to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to a 2018 scholarly study, when problems that are important to lobbyists are at the center of the political process, they boost their donations to certain committees and MPs. These lobbying payments may be driven by a desire to influence policy, as evidenced by another 2015 study that found that giving to a member of Congress improves access to their office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Andrew King, a Qatari foreign agent who made large donations to Graham's political action organizations, has more than just financial connections to the senator from South Carolina. King spent almost 20 years as a senior worker in Graham's office, where he oversaw the office's Middle Eastern affairs among other things, before starting Neale Creek, his government relations and political consulting business. In addition to his own political donations, King is the treasurer and co-founder of 150 PAC, which has given thousands of dollars to Graham and other members of Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to materials submitted to the Department of Justice, King and Neale Creek engaged in \"the promotion of business with the State of Qatar\" by using the access that congressional offices provided them. Graham's native state of South Carolina has significant investments from Qatar. However, the DOJ's Foreign Agents Registration Act database does not contain the particular papers that were exchanged between Neale Creek and congressional representatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The impact of Neale Creek goes beyond Graham's workplace. The company has met with congressional sources in person, over the phone, over email, and through text messages, and has contributed close to $180,000 to members of Congress and related PACs since 2020. With almost $225,000 in donations made since 2020, Qatari foreign agents employed by Rubin Turnbull & Associates jointly made the largest contributions to political groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Communications from other companies representing Qatar provide some information, even if it may not be quite apparent what Neale Creek and King are saying to Congressmen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, documents disseminated by Qatari foreign agents employed by Venable minimize the Gulf state's ties to terrorist groups while highlighting what Qatar considers to be the benefits of investments made by its sovereign wealth fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

The names of the five MEPs connected to the Huawei lobbying controversy were made public by European Parliament President Roberta Metsola on Wednesday. She announced that the EU Parliament<\/a> will vote to terminate Giusi Princi's and\u00a0 Fulvio Martusciello's immunity at the proposal of Belgium management.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Metsola also mentioned three additional EU parliamentarians who had acknowledged earlier this week that Belgian officials had approached them. MEPs Daniel Attard, Nikola Minchev, and Salvatore de Meo were among them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Eight persons have been taken into custody as a result of the inquiry thus far. These include lobbyists and Lawmakers assistants, as well as present and former Huawei workers. Although no MEPs have been taken into custody as of yet, Martusciello's name was anticipated following the arrest of his parliamentary aide in Italy in April.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to investigators, Huawei's lobbyists may have influenced lawmakers with unreported gifts and payments, such as free sports tickets, expensive presents, sizable cash transfers, and even all-expense-paid vacations to China, in return for backing for the Chinese business.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It was disclosed earlier this week that as part of a probe into Huawei's cash-for-influence operation in Brussels, Belgian prosecutors had asked the European Parliament to revoke the immunity of the five MEPs without identifying them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Prior to the revelation, De Meo, Attard, and Minchev\u2014the three MEPs who had gone public\u2014all denied any misconduct. According to De Meo, his issue concerns attending an aperitif, a social event that was not planned by Huawei. Representatives from the Huawei group were also present at the event, which was held outside the European Parliament.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The issue involving Maltese Labour MEP Daniel Attard pertains to a football game he watched in September from Huawei\u2019s box seats at the Anderlecht stadium in Belgium. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I was unaware that the invitation originated from a company or that it pertained to a corporate box. Subsequently, it became evident that the invitation was from an individual under investigation by the Belgian authorities, who aimed to discuss Huawei with me during the match,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Minchev, a Bulgarian Renew MEP, is also being investigated for going<\/a> to Huawei's box during a football game in Anderlecht. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"My presence at this event is now the reason for the management investigation into any potential issues or wrongdoing,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he told the Bulgarian press. Adam Mukhtar, Minchev's assistant, had his office raided by authorities in the middle of March.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The European Commission and European Parliament banned all Huawei lobbyists <\/a>from accessing the organisation\u2019s facilities in reaction to the controversy. Affiliates will be evaluated individually. Huawei stated it had no tolerance for corruption once the incident surfaced, but it hasn't released an official comment since. The Legal Affairs Committee of the EU Parliament will vote on withdrawing the immunity of the five lawmakers after the announcement on Wednesday.<\/p>\n","post_title":"EU integrity under pressure as Huawei-linked MEPs identified","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"eu-integrity-under-pressure-as-huawei-linked-meps-identified","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7849","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7842,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_content":"\n

A Qatari foreign agent contributed about $30,000 to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) campaign committees between 2020 and 2025. In order to support Qatar's interests<\/a>, Graham's office gave his lobbying business a lot of access during that time. This included more than 131 exchanges between the office and the agent, in-person meetings, and phone conversations with the senator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In recent years, this dynamic has been well demonstrated. According to a Washington Examiner analysis of hundreds of public records, Qatar's active foreign agents have given close to $700,000 to Congressmen and other government officials since 2020 while also having open channels of communication and face time with powerful lawmakers, frequently the same individuals they send checks to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to a 2018 scholarly study, when problems that are important to lobbyists are at the center of the political process, they boost their donations to certain committees and MPs. These lobbying payments may be driven by a desire to influence policy, as evidenced by another 2015 study that found that giving to a member of Congress improves access to their office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Andrew King, a Qatari foreign agent who made large donations to Graham's political action organizations, has more than just financial connections to the senator from South Carolina. King spent almost 20 years as a senior worker in Graham's office, where he oversaw the office's Middle Eastern affairs among other things, before starting Neale Creek, his government relations and political consulting business. In addition to his own political donations, King is the treasurer and co-founder of 150 PAC, which has given thousands of dollars to Graham and other members of Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to materials submitted to the Department of Justice, King and Neale Creek engaged in \"the promotion of business with the State of Qatar\" by using the access that congressional offices provided them. Graham's native state of South Carolina has significant investments from Qatar. However, the DOJ's Foreign Agents Registration Act database does not contain the particular papers that were exchanged between Neale Creek and congressional representatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The impact of Neale Creek goes beyond Graham's workplace. The company has met with congressional sources in person, over the phone, over email, and through text messages, and has contributed close to $180,000 to members of Congress and related PACs since 2020. With almost $225,000 in donations made since 2020, Qatari foreign agents employed by Rubin Turnbull & Associates jointly made the largest contributions to political groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Communications from other companies representing Qatar provide some information, even if it may not be quite apparent what Neale Creek and King are saying to Congressmen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, documents disseminated by Qatari foreign agents employed by Venable minimize the Gulf state's ties to terrorist groups while highlighting what Qatar considers to be the benefits of investments made by its sovereign wealth fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

The US, Israel's closest friend and biggest military supporter will ultimately determine whether or not the bloodshed in the Gaza Strip and, to a lesser extent, the West Bank is stopped. Furthermore, there is no indication that Washington is yet prepared to recognize a Palestinian state, despite EU officials pointing to a change in Trump's stance toward Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Paris lobbying EU, Britain to recognize Palestinian statehood\u00a0","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"paris-lobbying-eu-britain-to-recognize-palestinian-statehood","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7856","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7849,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content":"\n

The names of the five MEPs connected to the Huawei lobbying controversy were made public by European Parliament President Roberta Metsola on Wednesday. She announced that the EU Parliament<\/a> will vote to terminate Giusi Princi's and\u00a0 Fulvio Martusciello's immunity at the proposal of Belgium management.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Metsola also mentioned three additional EU parliamentarians who had acknowledged earlier this week that Belgian officials had approached them. MEPs Daniel Attard, Nikola Minchev, and Salvatore de Meo were among them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Eight persons have been taken into custody as a result of the inquiry thus far. These include lobbyists and Lawmakers assistants, as well as present and former Huawei workers. Although no MEPs have been taken into custody as of yet, Martusciello's name was anticipated following the arrest of his parliamentary aide in Italy in April.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to investigators, Huawei's lobbyists may have influenced lawmakers with unreported gifts and payments, such as free sports tickets, expensive presents, sizable cash transfers, and even all-expense-paid vacations to China, in return for backing for the Chinese business.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It was disclosed earlier this week that as part of a probe into Huawei's cash-for-influence operation in Brussels, Belgian prosecutors had asked the European Parliament to revoke the immunity of the five MEPs without identifying them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Prior to the revelation, De Meo, Attard, and Minchev\u2014the three MEPs who had gone public\u2014all denied any misconduct. According to De Meo, his issue concerns attending an aperitif, a social event that was not planned by Huawei. Representatives from the Huawei group were also present at the event, which was held outside the European Parliament.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The issue involving Maltese Labour MEP Daniel Attard pertains to a football game he watched in September from Huawei\u2019s box seats at the Anderlecht stadium in Belgium. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I was unaware that the invitation originated from a company or that it pertained to a corporate box. Subsequently, it became evident that the invitation was from an individual under investigation by the Belgian authorities, who aimed to discuss Huawei with me during the match,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Minchev, a Bulgarian Renew MEP, is also being investigated for going<\/a> to Huawei's box during a football game in Anderlecht. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"My presence at this event is now the reason for the management investigation into any potential issues or wrongdoing,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he told the Bulgarian press. Adam Mukhtar, Minchev's assistant, had his office raided by authorities in the middle of March.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The European Commission and European Parliament banned all Huawei lobbyists <\/a>from accessing the organisation\u2019s facilities in reaction to the controversy. Affiliates will be evaluated individually. Huawei stated it had no tolerance for corruption once the incident surfaced, but it hasn't released an official comment since. The Legal Affairs Committee of the EU Parliament will vote on withdrawing the immunity of the five lawmakers after the announcement on Wednesday.<\/p>\n","post_title":"EU integrity under pressure as Huawei-linked MEPs identified","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"eu-integrity-under-pressure-as-huawei-linked-meps-identified","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7849","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7842,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_content":"\n

A Qatari foreign agent contributed about $30,000 to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) campaign committees between 2020 and 2025. In order to support Qatar's interests<\/a>, Graham's office gave his lobbying business a lot of access during that time. This included more than 131 exchanges between the office and the agent, in-person meetings, and phone conversations with the senator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In recent years, this dynamic has been well demonstrated. According to a Washington Examiner analysis of hundreds of public records, Qatar's active foreign agents have given close to $700,000 to Congressmen and other government officials since 2020 while also having open channels of communication and face time with powerful lawmakers, frequently the same individuals they send checks to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to a 2018 scholarly study, when problems that are important to lobbyists are at the center of the political process, they boost their donations to certain committees and MPs. These lobbying payments may be driven by a desire to influence policy, as evidenced by another 2015 study that found that giving to a member of Congress improves access to their office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Andrew King, a Qatari foreign agent who made large donations to Graham's political action organizations, has more than just financial connections to the senator from South Carolina. King spent almost 20 years as a senior worker in Graham's office, where he oversaw the office's Middle Eastern affairs among other things, before starting Neale Creek, his government relations and political consulting business. In addition to his own political donations, King is the treasurer and co-founder of 150 PAC, which has given thousands of dollars to Graham and other members of Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to materials submitted to the Department of Justice, King and Neale Creek engaged in \"the promotion of business with the State of Qatar\" by using the access that congressional offices provided them. Graham's native state of South Carolina has significant investments from Qatar. However, the DOJ's Foreign Agents Registration Act database does not contain the particular papers that were exchanged between Neale Creek and congressional representatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The impact of Neale Creek goes beyond Graham's workplace. The company has met with congressional sources in person, over the phone, over email, and through text messages, and has contributed close to $180,000 to members of Congress and related PACs since 2020. With almost $225,000 in donations made since 2020, Qatari foreign agents employed by Rubin Turnbull & Associates jointly made the largest contributions to political groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Communications from other companies representing Qatar provide some information, even if it may not be quite apparent what Neale Creek and King are saying to Congressmen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, documents disseminated by Qatari foreign agents employed by Venable minimize the Gulf state's ties to terrorist groups while highlighting what Qatar considers to be the benefits of investments made by its sovereign wealth fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

EU recognition of the Palestinian territory, according to Duclos, might \"inspire Arab countries to specify their requirements for normalizing relations with Israel.\" According to the French ambassador cited above, Paris hopes that during the June 17\u201320 summit in New York, Middle Eastern<\/a> governments would continue to take \u201csteps\u201d toward normalisation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The US, Israel's closest friend and biggest military supporter will ultimately determine whether or not the bloodshed in the Gaza Strip and, to a lesser extent, the West Bank is stopped. Furthermore, there is no indication that Washington is yet prepared to recognize a Palestinian state, despite EU officials pointing to a change in Trump's stance toward Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Paris lobbying EU, Britain to recognize Palestinian statehood\u00a0","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"paris-lobbying-eu-britain-to-recognize-palestinian-statehood","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7856","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7849,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content":"\n

The names of the five MEPs connected to the Huawei lobbying controversy were made public by European Parliament President Roberta Metsola on Wednesday. She announced that the EU Parliament<\/a> will vote to terminate Giusi Princi's and\u00a0 Fulvio Martusciello's immunity at the proposal of Belgium management.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Metsola also mentioned three additional EU parliamentarians who had acknowledged earlier this week that Belgian officials had approached them. MEPs Daniel Attard, Nikola Minchev, and Salvatore de Meo were among them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Eight persons have been taken into custody as a result of the inquiry thus far. These include lobbyists and Lawmakers assistants, as well as present and former Huawei workers. Although no MEPs have been taken into custody as of yet, Martusciello's name was anticipated following the arrest of his parliamentary aide in Italy in April.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to investigators, Huawei's lobbyists may have influenced lawmakers with unreported gifts and payments, such as free sports tickets, expensive presents, sizable cash transfers, and even all-expense-paid vacations to China, in return for backing for the Chinese business.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It was disclosed earlier this week that as part of a probe into Huawei's cash-for-influence operation in Brussels, Belgian prosecutors had asked the European Parliament to revoke the immunity of the five MEPs without identifying them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Prior to the revelation, De Meo, Attard, and Minchev\u2014the three MEPs who had gone public\u2014all denied any misconduct. According to De Meo, his issue concerns attending an aperitif, a social event that was not planned by Huawei. Representatives from the Huawei group were also present at the event, which was held outside the European Parliament.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The issue involving Maltese Labour MEP Daniel Attard pertains to a football game he watched in September from Huawei\u2019s box seats at the Anderlecht stadium in Belgium. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I was unaware that the invitation originated from a company or that it pertained to a corporate box. Subsequently, it became evident that the invitation was from an individual under investigation by the Belgian authorities, who aimed to discuss Huawei with me during the match,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Minchev, a Bulgarian Renew MEP, is also being investigated for going<\/a> to Huawei's box during a football game in Anderlecht. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"My presence at this event is now the reason for the management investigation into any potential issues or wrongdoing,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he told the Bulgarian press. Adam Mukhtar, Minchev's assistant, had his office raided by authorities in the middle of March.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The European Commission and European Parliament banned all Huawei lobbyists <\/a>from accessing the organisation\u2019s facilities in reaction to the controversy. Affiliates will be evaluated individually. Huawei stated it had no tolerance for corruption once the incident surfaced, but it hasn't released an official comment since. The Legal Affairs Committee of the EU Parliament will vote on withdrawing the immunity of the five lawmakers after the announcement on Wednesday.<\/p>\n","post_title":"EU integrity under pressure as Huawei-linked MEPs identified","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"eu-integrity-under-pressure-as-huawei-linked-meps-identified","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7849","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7842,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_content":"\n

A Qatari foreign agent contributed about $30,000 to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) campaign committees between 2020 and 2025. In order to support Qatar's interests<\/a>, Graham's office gave his lobbying business a lot of access during that time. This included more than 131 exchanges between the office and the agent, in-person meetings, and phone conversations with the senator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In recent years, this dynamic has been well demonstrated. According to a Washington Examiner analysis of hundreds of public records, Qatar's active foreign agents have given close to $700,000 to Congressmen and other government officials since 2020 while also having open channels of communication and face time with powerful lawmakers, frequently the same individuals they send checks to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to a 2018 scholarly study, when problems that are important to lobbyists are at the center of the political process, they boost their donations to certain committees and MPs. These lobbying payments may be driven by a desire to influence policy, as evidenced by another 2015 study that found that giving to a member of Congress improves access to their office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Andrew King, a Qatari foreign agent who made large donations to Graham's political action organizations, has more than just financial connections to the senator from South Carolina. King spent almost 20 years as a senior worker in Graham's office, where he oversaw the office's Middle Eastern affairs among other things, before starting Neale Creek, his government relations and political consulting business. In addition to his own political donations, King is the treasurer and co-founder of 150 PAC, which has given thousands of dollars to Graham and other members of Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to materials submitted to the Department of Justice, King and Neale Creek engaged in \"the promotion of business with the State of Qatar\" by using the access that congressional offices provided them. Graham's native state of South Carolina has significant investments from Qatar. However, the DOJ's Foreign Agents Registration Act database does not contain the particular papers that were exchanged between Neale Creek and congressional representatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The impact of Neale Creek goes beyond Graham's workplace. The company has met with congressional sources in person, over the phone, over email, and through text messages, and has contributed close to $180,000 to members of Congress and related PACs since 2020. With almost $225,000 in donations made since 2020, Qatari foreign agents employed by Rubin Turnbull & Associates jointly made the largest contributions to political groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Communications from other companies representing Qatar provide some information, even if it may not be quite apparent what Neale Creek and King are saying to Congressmen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, documents disseminated by Qatari foreign agents employed by Venable minimize the Gulf state's ties to terrorist groups while highlighting what Qatar considers to be the benefits of investments made by its sovereign wealth fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

According to Michel Duclos, a former ambassador to Syria and fellow at the Institut Montaigne, publicly recognizing a Palestinian state would now appear more like a rebuke than a step toward peace as the humanitarian catastrophe in the Gaza Strip worsens. He declared, \"It would be a condemnation of Israel.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

EU recognition of the Palestinian territory, according to Duclos, might \"inspire Arab countries to specify their requirements for normalizing relations with Israel.\" According to the French ambassador cited above, Paris hopes that during the June 17\u201320 summit in New York, Middle Eastern<\/a> governments would continue to take \u201csteps\u201d toward normalisation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The US, Israel's closest friend and biggest military supporter will ultimately determine whether or not the bloodshed in the Gaza Strip and, to a lesser extent, the West Bank is stopped. Furthermore, there is no indication that Washington is yet prepared to recognize a Palestinian state, despite EU officials pointing to a change in Trump's stance toward Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Paris lobbying EU, Britain to recognize Palestinian statehood\u00a0","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"paris-lobbying-eu-britain-to-recognize-palestinian-statehood","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7856","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7849,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content":"\n

The names of the five MEPs connected to the Huawei lobbying controversy were made public by European Parliament President Roberta Metsola on Wednesday. She announced that the EU Parliament<\/a> will vote to terminate Giusi Princi's and\u00a0 Fulvio Martusciello's immunity at the proposal of Belgium management.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Metsola also mentioned three additional EU parliamentarians who had acknowledged earlier this week that Belgian officials had approached them. MEPs Daniel Attard, Nikola Minchev, and Salvatore de Meo were among them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Eight persons have been taken into custody as a result of the inquiry thus far. These include lobbyists and Lawmakers assistants, as well as present and former Huawei workers. Although no MEPs have been taken into custody as of yet, Martusciello's name was anticipated following the arrest of his parliamentary aide in Italy in April.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to investigators, Huawei's lobbyists may have influenced lawmakers with unreported gifts and payments, such as free sports tickets, expensive presents, sizable cash transfers, and even all-expense-paid vacations to China, in return for backing for the Chinese business.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It was disclosed earlier this week that as part of a probe into Huawei's cash-for-influence operation in Brussels, Belgian prosecutors had asked the European Parliament to revoke the immunity of the five MEPs without identifying them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Prior to the revelation, De Meo, Attard, and Minchev\u2014the three MEPs who had gone public\u2014all denied any misconduct. According to De Meo, his issue concerns attending an aperitif, a social event that was not planned by Huawei. Representatives from the Huawei group were also present at the event, which was held outside the European Parliament.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The issue involving Maltese Labour MEP Daniel Attard pertains to a football game he watched in September from Huawei\u2019s box seats at the Anderlecht stadium in Belgium. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I was unaware that the invitation originated from a company or that it pertained to a corporate box. Subsequently, it became evident that the invitation was from an individual under investigation by the Belgian authorities, who aimed to discuss Huawei with me during the match,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Minchev, a Bulgarian Renew MEP, is also being investigated for going<\/a> to Huawei's box during a football game in Anderlecht. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"My presence at this event is now the reason for the management investigation into any potential issues or wrongdoing,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he told the Bulgarian press. Adam Mukhtar, Minchev's assistant, had his office raided by authorities in the middle of March.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The European Commission and European Parliament banned all Huawei lobbyists <\/a>from accessing the organisation\u2019s facilities in reaction to the controversy. Affiliates will be evaluated individually. Huawei stated it had no tolerance for corruption once the incident surfaced, but it hasn't released an official comment since. The Legal Affairs Committee of the EU Parliament will vote on withdrawing the immunity of the five lawmakers after the announcement on Wednesday.<\/p>\n","post_title":"EU integrity under pressure as Huawei-linked MEPs identified","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"eu-integrity-under-pressure-as-huawei-linked-meps-identified","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7849","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7842,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_content":"\n

A Qatari foreign agent contributed about $30,000 to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) campaign committees between 2020 and 2025. In order to support Qatar's interests<\/a>, Graham's office gave his lobbying business a lot of access during that time. This included more than 131 exchanges between the office and the agent, in-person meetings, and phone conversations with the senator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In recent years, this dynamic has been well demonstrated. According to a Washington Examiner analysis of hundreds of public records, Qatar's active foreign agents have given close to $700,000 to Congressmen and other government officials since 2020 while also having open channels of communication and face time with powerful lawmakers, frequently the same individuals they send checks to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to a 2018 scholarly study, when problems that are important to lobbyists are at the center of the political process, they boost their donations to certain committees and MPs. These lobbying payments may be driven by a desire to influence policy, as evidenced by another 2015 study that found that giving to a member of Congress improves access to their office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Andrew King, a Qatari foreign agent who made large donations to Graham's political action organizations, has more than just financial connections to the senator from South Carolina. King spent almost 20 years as a senior worker in Graham's office, where he oversaw the office's Middle Eastern affairs among other things, before starting Neale Creek, his government relations and political consulting business. In addition to his own political donations, King is the treasurer and co-founder of 150 PAC, which has given thousands of dollars to Graham and other members of Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to materials submitted to the Department of Justice, King and Neale Creek engaged in \"the promotion of business with the State of Qatar\" by using the access that congressional offices provided them. Graham's native state of South Carolina has significant investments from Qatar. However, the DOJ's Foreign Agents Registration Act database does not contain the particular papers that were exchanged between Neale Creek and congressional representatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The impact of Neale Creek goes beyond Graham's workplace. The company has met with congressional sources in person, over the phone, over email, and through text messages, and has contributed close to $180,000 to members of Congress and related PACs since 2020. With almost $225,000 in donations made since 2020, Qatari foreign agents employed by Rubin Turnbull & Associates jointly made the largest contributions to political groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Communications from other companies representing Qatar provide some information, even if it may not be quite apparent what Neale Creek and King are saying to Congressmen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, documents disseminated by Qatari foreign agents employed by Venable minimize the Gulf state's ties to terrorist groups while highlighting what Qatar considers to be the benefits of investments made by its sovereign wealth fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

French officials have long warned that Paris will only recognize Palestinian statehood if it improves the peace process, but they have stated for years that Paris is on the verge of doing so. French president declared in April that it was time to take the next stage toward recognition and take part in a collaborative approach that would recognize both Israel and a Palestinian state.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Michel Duclos, a former ambassador to Syria and fellow at the Institut Montaigne, publicly recognizing a Palestinian state would now appear more like a rebuke than a step toward peace as the humanitarian catastrophe in the Gaza Strip worsens. He declared, \"It would be a condemnation of Israel.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

EU recognition of the Palestinian territory, according to Duclos, might \"inspire Arab countries to specify their requirements for normalizing relations with Israel.\" According to the French ambassador cited above, Paris hopes that during the June 17\u201320 summit in New York, Middle Eastern<\/a> governments would continue to take \u201csteps\u201d toward normalisation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The US, Israel's closest friend and biggest military supporter will ultimately determine whether or not the bloodshed in the Gaza Strip and, to a lesser extent, the West Bank is stopped. Furthermore, there is no indication that Washington is yet prepared to recognize a Palestinian state, despite EU officials pointing to a change in Trump's stance toward Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Paris lobbying EU, Britain to recognize Palestinian statehood\u00a0","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"paris-lobbying-eu-britain-to-recognize-palestinian-statehood","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7856","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7849,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content":"\n

The names of the five MEPs connected to the Huawei lobbying controversy were made public by European Parliament President Roberta Metsola on Wednesday. She announced that the EU Parliament<\/a> will vote to terminate Giusi Princi's and\u00a0 Fulvio Martusciello's immunity at the proposal of Belgium management.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Metsola also mentioned three additional EU parliamentarians who had acknowledged earlier this week that Belgian officials had approached them. MEPs Daniel Attard, Nikola Minchev, and Salvatore de Meo were among them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Eight persons have been taken into custody as a result of the inquiry thus far. These include lobbyists and Lawmakers assistants, as well as present and former Huawei workers. Although no MEPs have been taken into custody as of yet, Martusciello's name was anticipated following the arrest of his parliamentary aide in Italy in April.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to investigators, Huawei's lobbyists may have influenced lawmakers with unreported gifts and payments, such as free sports tickets, expensive presents, sizable cash transfers, and even all-expense-paid vacations to China, in return for backing for the Chinese business.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It was disclosed earlier this week that as part of a probe into Huawei's cash-for-influence operation in Brussels, Belgian prosecutors had asked the European Parliament to revoke the immunity of the five MEPs without identifying them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Prior to the revelation, De Meo, Attard, and Minchev\u2014the three MEPs who had gone public\u2014all denied any misconduct. According to De Meo, his issue concerns attending an aperitif, a social event that was not planned by Huawei. Representatives from the Huawei group were also present at the event, which was held outside the European Parliament.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The issue involving Maltese Labour MEP Daniel Attard pertains to a football game he watched in September from Huawei\u2019s box seats at the Anderlecht stadium in Belgium. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I was unaware that the invitation originated from a company or that it pertained to a corporate box. Subsequently, it became evident that the invitation was from an individual under investigation by the Belgian authorities, who aimed to discuss Huawei with me during the match,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Minchev, a Bulgarian Renew MEP, is also being investigated for going<\/a> to Huawei's box during a football game in Anderlecht. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"My presence at this event is now the reason for the management investigation into any potential issues or wrongdoing,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he told the Bulgarian press. Adam Mukhtar, Minchev's assistant, had his office raided by authorities in the middle of March.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The European Commission and European Parliament banned all Huawei lobbyists <\/a>from accessing the organisation\u2019s facilities in reaction to the controversy. Affiliates will be evaluated individually. Huawei stated it had no tolerance for corruption once the incident surfaced, but it hasn't released an official comment since. The Legal Affairs Committee of the EU Parliament will vote on withdrawing the immunity of the five lawmakers after the announcement on Wednesday.<\/p>\n","post_title":"EU integrity under pressure as Huawei-linked MEPs identified","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"eu-integrity-under-pressure-as-huawei-linked-meps-identified","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7849","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7842,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_content":"\n

A Qatari foreign agent contributed about $30,000 to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) campaign committees between 2020 and 2025. In order to support Qatar's interests<\/a>, Graham's office gave his lobbying business a lot of access during that time. This included more than 131 exchanges between the office and the agent, in-person meetings, and phone conversations with the senator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In recent years, this dynamic has been well demonstrated. According to a Washington Examiner analysis of hundreds of public records, Qatar's active foreign agents have given close to $700,000 to Congressmen and other government officials since 2020 while also having open channels of communication and face time with powerful lawmakers, frequently the same individuals they send checks to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to a 2018 scholarly study, when problems that are important to lobbyists are at the center of the political process, they boost their donations to certain committees and MPs. These lobbying payments may be driven by a desire to influence policy, as evidenced by another 2015 study that found that giving to a member of Congress improves access to their office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Andrew King, a Qatari foreign agent who made large donations to Graham's political action organizations, has more than just financial connections to the senator from South Carolina. King spent almost 20 years as a senior worker in Graham's office, where he oversaw the office's Middle Eastern affairs among other things, before starting Neale Creek, his government relations and political consulting business. In addition to his own political donations, King is the treasurer and co-founder of 150 PAC, which has given thousands of dollars to Graham and other members of Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to materials submitted to the Department of Justice, King and Neale Creek engaged in \"the promotion of business with the State of Qatar\" by using the access that congressional offices provided them. Graham's native state of South Carolina has significant investments from Qatar. However, the DOJ's Foreign Agents Registration Act database does not contain the particular papers that were exchanged between Neale Creek and congressional representatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The impact of Neale Creek goes beyond Graham's workplace. The company has met with congressional sources in person, over the phone, over email, and through text messages, and has contributed close to $180,000 to members of Congress and related PACs since 2020. With almost $225,000 in donations made since 2020, Qatari foreign agents employed by Rubin Turnbull & Associates jointly made the largest contributions to political groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Communications from other companies representing Qatar provide some information, even if it may not be quite apparent what Neale Creek and King are saying to Congressmen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, documents disseminated by Qatari foreign agents employed by Venable minimize the Gulf state's ties to terrorist groups while highlighting what Qatar considers to be the benefits of investments made by its sovereign wealth fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Spain, including Norway and Ireland joined the 140 other UN member nations who recognize the state of Palestine last year. Israel is not recognized by many nations in Middle East and North African countries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

French officials have long warned that Paris will only recognize Palestinian statehood if it improves the peace process, but they have stated for years that Paris is on the verge of doing so. French president declared in April that it was time to take the next stage toward recognition and take part in a collaborative approach that would recognize both Israel and a Palestinian state.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Michel Duclos, a former ambassador to Syria and fellow at the Institut Montaigne, publicly recognizing a Palestinian state would now appear more like a rebuke than a step toward peace as the humanitarian catastrophe in the Gaza Strip worsens. He declared, \"It would be a condemnation of Israel.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

EU recognition of the Palestinian territory, according to Duclos, might \"inspire Arab countries to specify their requirements for normalizing relations with Israel.\" According to the French ambassador cited above, Paris hopes that during the June 17\u201320 summit in New York, Middle Eastern<\/a> governments would continue to take \u201csteps\u201d toward normalisation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The US, Israel's closest friend and biggest military supporter will ultimately determine whether or not the bloodshed in the Gaza Strip and, to a lesser extent, the West Bank is stopped. Furthermore, there is no indication that Washington is yet prepared to recognize a Palestinian state, despite EU officials pointing to a change in Trump's stance toward Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Paris lobbying EU, Britain to recognize Palestinian statehood\u00a0","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"paris-lobbying-eu-britain-to-recognize-palestinian-statehood","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7856","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7849,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content":"\n

The names of the five MEPs connected to the Huawei lobbying controversy were made public by European Parliament President Roberta Metsola on Wednesday. She announced that the EU Parliament<\/a> will vote to terminate Giusi Princi's and\u00a0 Fulvio Martusciello's immunity at the proposal of Belgium management.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Metsola also mentioned three additional EU parliamentarians who had acknowledged earlier this week that Belgian officials had approached them. MEPs Daniel Attard, Nikola Minchev, and Salvatore de Meo were among them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Eight persons have been taken into custody as a result of the inquiry thus far. These include lobbyists and Lawmakers assistants, as well as present and former Huawei workers. Although no MEPs have been taken into custody as of yet, Martusciello's name was anticipated following the arrest of his parliamentary aide in Italy in April.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to investigators, Huawei's lobbyists may have influenced lawmakers with unreported gifts and payments, such as free sports tickets, expensive presents, sizable cash transfers, and even all-expense-paid vacations to China, in return for backing for the Chinese business.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It was disclosed earlier this week that as part of a probe into Huawei's cash-for-influence operation in Brussels, Belgian prosecutors had asked the European Parliament to revoke the immunity of the five MEPs without identifying them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Prior to the revelation, De Meo, Attard, and Minchev\u2014the three MEPs who had gone public\u2014all denied any misconduct. According to De Meo, his issue concerns attending an aperitif, a social event that was not planned by Huawei. Representatives from the Huawei group were also present at the event, which was held outside the European Parliament.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The issue involving Maltese Labour MEP Daniel Attard pertains to a football game he watched in September from Huawei\u2019s box seats at the Anderlecht stadium in Belgium. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I was unaware that the invitation originated from a company or that it pertained to a corporate box. Subsequently, it became evident that the invitation was from an individual under investigation by the Belgian authorities, who aimed to discuss Huawei with me during the match,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Minchev, a Bulgarian Renew MEP, is also being investigated for going<\/a> to Huawei's box during a football game in Anderlecht. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"My presence at this event is now the reason for the management investigation into any potential issues or wrongdoing,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he told the Bulgarian press. Adam Mukhtar, Minchev's assistant, had his office raided by authorities in the middle of March.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The European Commission and European Parliament banned all Huawei lobbyists <\/a>from accessing the organisation\u2019s facilities in reaction to the controversy. Affiliates will be evaluated individually. Huawei stated it had no tolerance for corruption once the incident surfaced, but it hasn't released an official comment since. The Legal Affairs Committee of the EU Parliament will vote on withdrawing the immunity of the five lawmakers after the announcement on Wednesday.<\/p>\n","post_title":"EU integrity under pressure as Huawei-linked MEPs identified","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"eu-integrity-under-pressure-as-huawei-linked-meps-identified","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7849","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7842,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_content":"\n

A Qatari foreign agent contributed about $30,000 to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) campaign committees between 2020 and 2025. In order to support Qatar's interests<\/a>, Graham's office gave his lobbying business a lot of access during that time. This included more than 131 exchanges between the office and the agent, in-person meetings, and phone conversations with the senator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In recent years, this dynamic has been well demonstrated. According to a Washington Examiner analysis of hundreds of public records, Qatar's active foreign agents have given close to $700,000 to Congressmen and other government officials since 2020 while also having open channels of communication and face time with powerful lawmakers, frequently the same individuals they send checks to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to a 2018 scholarly study, when problems that are important to lobbyists are at the center of the political process, they boost their donations to certain committees and MPs. These lobbying payments may be driven by a desire to influence policy, as evidenced by another 2015 study that found that giving to a member of Congress improves access to their office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Andrew King, a Qatari foreign agent who made large donations to Graham's political action organizations, has more than just financial connections to the senator from South Carolina. King spent almost 20 years as a senior worker in Graham's office, where he oversaw the office's Middle Eastern affairs among other things, before starting Neale Creek, his government relations and political consulting business. In addition to his own political donations, King is the treasurer and co-founder of 150 PAC, which has given thousands of dollars to Graham and other members of Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to materials submitted to the Department of Justice, King and Neale Creek engaged in \"the promotion of business with the State of Qatar\" by using the access that congressional offices provided them. Graham's native state of South Carolina has significant investments from Qatar. However, the DOJ's Foreign Agents Registration Act database does not contain the particular papers that were exchanged between Neale Creek and congressional representatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The impact of Neale Creek goes beyond Graham's workplace. The company has met with congressional sources in person, over the phone, over email, and through text messages, and has contributed close to $180,000 to members of Congress and related PACs since 2020. With almost $225,000 in donations made since 2020, Qatari foreign agents employed by Rubin Turnbull & Associates jointly made the largest contributions to political groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Communications from other companies representing Qatar provide some information, even if it may not be quite apparent what Neale Creek and King are saying to Congressmen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, documents disseminated by Qatari foreign agents employed by Venable minimize the Gulf state's ties to terrorist groups while highlighting what Qatar considers to be the benefits of investments made by its sovereign wealth fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

In response to the Palestinians' decades-long demand, Paris and Britain would be the first G7 countries to recognize the state of Palestine. Israel has frequently attacked French diplomatic initiatives, claiming they legitimate Hamas and essentially compensate the terrorist organization for the terror assault in October 2023. Regarding Paris and London's recognition of Palestine, the Israeli administration is probably going to say the same thing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Spain, including Norway and Ireland joined the 140 other UN member nations who recognize the state of Palestine last year. Israel is not recognized by many nations in Middle East and North African countries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

French officials have long warned that Paris will only recognize Palestinian statehood if it improves the peace process, but they have stated for years that Paris is on the verge of doing so. French president declared in April that it was time to take the next stage toward recognition and take part in a collaborative approach that would recognize both Israel and a Palestinian state.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Michel Duclos, a former ambassador to Syria and fellow at the Institut Montaigne, publicly recognizing a Palestinian state would now appear more like a rebuke than a step toward peace as the humanitarian catastrophe in the Gaza Strip worsens. He declared, \"It would be a condemnation of Israel.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

EU recognition of the Palestinian territory, according to Duclos, might \"inspire Arab countries to specify their requirements for normalizing relations with Israel.\" According to the French ambassador cited above, Paris hopes that during the June 17\u201320 summit in New York, Middle Eastern<\/a> governments would continue to take \u201csteps\u201d toward normalisation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The US, Israel's closest friend and biggest military supporter will ultimately determine whether or not the bloodshed in the Gaza Strip and, to a lesser extent, the West Bank is stopped. Furthermore, there is no indication that Washington is yet prepared to recognize a Palestinian state, despite EU officials pointing to a change in Trump's stance toward Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Paris lobbying EU, Britain to recognize Palestinian statehood\u00a0","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"paris-lobbying-eu-britain-to-recognize-palestinian-statehood","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7856","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7849,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content":"\n

The names of the five MEPs connected to the Huawei lobbying controversy were made public by European Parliament President Roberta Metsola on Wednesday. She announced that the EU Parliament<\/a> will vote to terminate Giusi Princi's and\u00a0 Fulvio Martusciello's immunity at the proposal of Belgium management.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Metsola also mentioned three additional EU parliamentarians who had acknowledged earlier this week that Belgian officials had approached them. MEPs Daniel Attard, Nikola Minchev, and Salvatore de Meo were among them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Eight persons have been taken into custody as a result of the inquiry thus far. These include lobbyists and Lawmakers assistants, as well as present and former Huawei workers. Although no MEPs have been taken into custody as of yet, Martusciello's name was anticipated following the arrest of his parliamentary aide in Italy in April.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to investigators, Huawei's lobbyists may have influenced lawmakers with unreported gifts and payments, such as free sports tickets, expensive presents, sizable cash transfers, and even all-expense-paid vacations to China, in return for backing for the Chinese business.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It was disclosed earlier this week that as part of a probe into Huawei's cash-for-influence operation in Brussels, Belgian prosecutors had asked the European Parliament to revoke the immunity of the five MEPs without identifying them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Prior to the revelation, De Meo, Attard, and Minchev\u2014the three MEPs who had gone public\u2014all denied any misconduct. According to De Meo, his issue concerns attending an aperitif, a social event that was not planned by Huawei. Representatives from the Huawei group were also present at the event, which was held outside the European Parliament.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The issue involving Maltese Labour MEP Daniel Attard pertains to a football game he watched in September from Huawei\u2019s box seats at the Anderlecht stadium in Belgium. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I was unaware that the invitation originated from a company or that it pertained to a corporate box. Subsequently, it became evident that the invitation was from an individual under investigation by the Belgian authorities, who aimed to discuss Huawei with me during the match,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Minchev, a Bulgarian Renew MEP, is also being investigated for going<\/a> to Huawei's box during a football game in Anderlecht. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"My presence at this event is now the reason for the management investigation into any potential issues or wrongdoing,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he told the Bulgarian press. Adam Mukhtar, Minchev's assistant, had his office raided by authorities in the middle of March.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The European Commission and European Parliament banned all Huawei lobbyists <\/a>from accessing the organisation\u2019s facilities in reaction to the controversy. Affiliates will be evaluated individually. Huawei stated it had no tolerance for corruption once the incident surfaced, but it hasn't released an official comment since. The Legal Affairs Committee of the EU Parliament will vote on withdrawing the immunity of the five lawmakers after the announcement on Wednesday.<\/p>\n","post_title":"EU integrity under pressure as Huawei-linked MEPs identified","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"eu-integrity-under-pressure-as-huawei-linked-meps-identified","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7849","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7842,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_content":"\n

A Qatari foreign agent contributed about $30,000 to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) campaign committees between 2020 and 2025. In order to support Qatar's interests<\/a>, Graham's office gave his lobbying business a lot of access during that time. This included more than 131 exchanges between the office and the agent, in-person meetings, and phone conversations with the senator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In recent years, this dynamic has been well demonstrated. According to a Washington Examiner analysis of hundreds of public records, Qatar's active foreign agents have given close to $700,000 to Congressmen and other government officials since 2020 while also having open channels of communication and face time with powerful lawmakers, frequently the same individuals they send checks to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to a 2018 scholarly study, when problems that are important to lobbyists are at the center of the political process, they boost their donations to certain committees and MPs. These lobbying payments may be driven by a desire to influence policy, as evidenced by another 2015 study that found that giving to a member of Congress improves access to their office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Andrew King, a Qatari foreign agent who made large donations to Graham's political action organizations, has more than just financial connections to the senator from South Carolina. King spent almost 20 years as a senior worker in Graham's office, where he oversaw the office's Middle Eastern affairs among other things, before starting Neale Creek, his government relations and political consulting business. In addition to his own political donations, King is the treasurer and co-founder of 150 PAC, which has given thousands of dollars to Graham and other members of Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to materials submitted to the Department of Justice, King and Neale Creek engaged in \"the promotion of business with the State of Qatar\" by using the access that congressional offices provided them. Graham's native state of South Carolina has significant investments from Qatar. However, the DOJ's Foreign Agents Registration Act database does not contain the particular papers that were exchanged between Neale Creek and congressional representatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The impact of Neale Creek goes beyond Graham's workplace. The company has met with congressional sources in person, over the phone, over email, and through text messages, and has contributed close to $180,000 to members of Congress and related PACs since 2020. With almost $225,000 in donations made since 2020, Qatari foreign agents employed by Rubin Turnbull & Associates jointly made the largest contributions to political groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Communications from other companies representing Qatar provide some information, even if it may not be quite apparent what Neale Creek and King are saying to Congressmen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, documents disseminated by Qatari foreign agents employed by Venable minimize the Gulf state's ties to terrorist groups while highlighting what Qatar considers to be the benefits of investments made by its sovereign wealth fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Last week, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer's spokeswoman stated that the UK was prepared to collaborate with regional partners and nations to \"do what we can to support the foundations of Palestinian statehood.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In response to the Palestinians' decades-long demand, Paris and Britain would be the first G7 countries to recognize the state of Palestine. Israel has frequently attacked French diplomatic initiatives, claiming they legitimate Hamas and essentially compensate the terrorist organization for the terror assault in October 2023. Regarding Paris and London's recognition of Palestine, the Israeli administration is probably going to say the same thing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Spain, including Norway and Ireland joined the 140 other UN member nations who recognize the state of Palestine last year. Israel is not recognized by many nations in Middle East and North African countries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

French officials have long warned that Paris will only recognize Palestinian statehood if it improves the peace process, but they have stated for years that Paris is on the verge of doing so. French president declared in April that it was time to take the next stage toward recognition and take part in a collaborative approach that would recognize both Israel and a Palestinian state.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Michel Duclos, a former ambassador to Syria and fellow at the Institut Montaigne, publicly recognizing a Palestinian state would now appear more like a rebuke than a step toward peace as the humanitarian catastrophe in the Gaza Strip worsens. He declared, \"It would be a condemnation of Israel.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

EU recognition of the Palestinian territory, according to Duclos, might \"inspire Arab countries to specify their requirements for normalizing relations with Israel.\" According to the French ambassador cited above, Paris hopes that during the June 17\u201320 summit in New York, Middle Eastern<\/a> governments would continue to take \u201csteps\u201d toward normalisation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The US, Israel's closest friend and biggest military supporter will ultimately determine whether or not the bloodshed in the Gaza Strip and, to a lesser extent, the West Bank is stopped. Furthermore, there is no indication that Washington is yet prepared to recognize a Palestinian state, despite EU officials pointing to a change in Trump's stance toward Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Paris lobbying EU, Britain to recognize Palestinian statehood\u00a0","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"paris-lobbying-eu-britain-to-recognize-palestinian-statehood","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7856","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7849,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content":"\n

The names of the five MEPs connected to the Huawei lobbying controversy were made public by European Parliament President Roberta Metsola on Wednesday. She announced that the EU Parliament<\/a> will vote to terminate Giusi Princi's and\u00a0 Fulvio Martusciello's immunity at the proposal of Belgium management.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Metsola also mentioned three additional EU parliamentarians who had acknowledged earlier this week that Belgian officials had approached them. MEPs Daniel Attard, Nikola Minchev, and Salvatore de Meo were among them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Eight persons have been taken into custody as a result of the inquiry thus far. These include lobbyists and Lawmakers assistants, as well as present and former Huawei workers. Although no MEPs have been taken into custody as of yet, Martusciello's name was anticipated following the arrest of his parliamentary aide in Italy in April.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to investigators, Huawei's lobbyists may have influenced lawmakers with unreported gifts and payments, such as free sports tickets, expensive presents, sizable cash transfers, and even all-expense-paid vacations to China, in return for backing for the Chinese business.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It was disclosed earlier this week that as part of a probe into Huawei's cash-for-influence operation in Brussels, Belgian prosecutors had asked the European Parliament to revoke the immunity of the five MEPs without identifying them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Prior to the revelation, De Meo, Attard, and Minchev\u2014the three MEPs who had gone public\u2014all denied any misconduct. According to De Meo, his issue concerns attending an aperitif, a social event that was not planned by Huawei. Representatives from the Huawei group were also present at the event, which was held outside the European Parliament.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The issue involving Maltese Labour MEP Daniel Attard pertains to a football game he watched in September from Huawei\u2019s box seats at the Anderlecht stadium in Belgium. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I was unaware that the invitation originated from a company or that it pertained to a corporate box. Subsequently, it became evident that the invitation was from an individual under investigation by the Belgian authorities, who aimed to discuss Huawei with me during the match,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Minchev, a Bulgarian Renew MEP, is also being investigated for going<\/a> to Huawei's box during a football game in Anderlecht. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"My presence at this event is now the reason for the management investigation into any potential issues or wrongdoing,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he told the Bulgarian press. Adam Mukhtar, Minchev's assistant, had his office raided by authorities in the middle of March.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The European Commission and European Parliament banned all Huawei lobbyists <\/a>from accessing the organisation\u2019s facilities in reaction to the controversy. Affiliates will be evaluated individually. Huawei stated it had no tolerance for corruption once the incident surfaced, but it hasn't released an official comment since. The Legal Affairs Committee of the EU Parliament will vote on withdrawing the immunity of the five lawmakers after the announcement on Wednesday.<\/p>\n","post_title":"EU integrity under pressure as Huawei-linked MEPs identified","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"eu-integrity-under-pressure-as-huawei-linked-meps-identified","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7849","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7842,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_content":"\n

A Qatari foreign agent contributed about $30,000 to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) campaign committees between 2020 and 2025. In order to support Qatar's interests<\/a>, Graham's office gave his lobbying business a lot of access during that time. This included more than 131 exchanges between the office and the agent, in-person meetings, and phone conversations with the senator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In recent years, this dynamic has been well demonstrated. According to a Washington Examiner analysis of hundreds of public records, Qatar's active foreign agents have given close to $700,000 to Congressmen and other government officials since 2020 while also having open channels of communication and face time with powerful lawmakers, frequently the same individuals they send checks to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to a 2018 scholarly study, when problems that are important to lobbyists are at the center of the political process, they boost their donations to certain committees and MPs. These lobbying payments may be driven by a desire to influence policy, as evidenced by another 2015 study that found that giving to a member of Congress improves access to their office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Andrew King, a Qatari foreign agent who made large donations to Graham's political action organizations, has more than just financial connections to the senator from South Carolina. King spent almost 20 years as a senior worker in Graham's office, where he oversaw the office's Middle Eastern affairs among other things, before starting Neale Creek, his government relations and political consulting business. In addition to his own political donations, King is the treasurer and co-founder of 150 PAC, which has given thousands of dollars to Graham and other members of Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to materials submitted to the Department of Justice, King and Neale Creek engaged in \"the promotion of business with the State of Qatar\" by using the access that congressional offices provided them. Graham's native state of South Carolina has significant investments from Qatar. However, the DOJ's Foreign Agents Registration Act database does not contain the particular papers that were exchanged between Neale Creek and congressional representatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The impact of Neale Creek goes beyond Graham's workplace. The company has met with congressional sources in person, over the phone, over email, and through text messages, and has contributed close to $180,000 to members of Congress and related PACs since 2020. With almost $225,000 in donations made since 2020, Qatari foreign agents employed by Rubin Turnbull & Associates jointly made the largest contributions to political groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Communications from other companies representing Qatar provide some information, even if it may not be quite apparent what Neale Creek and King are saying to Congressmen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, documents disseminated by Qatari foreign agents employed by Venable minimize the Gulf state's ties to terrorist groups while highlighting what Qatar considers to be the benefits of investments made by its sovereign wealth fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

a EU diplomat stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last week, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer's spokeswoman stated that the UK was prepared to collaborate with regional partners and nations to \"do what we can to support the foundations of Palestinian statehood.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In response to the Palestinians' decades-long demand, Paris and Britain would be the first G7 countries to recognize the state of Palestine. Israel has frequently attacked French diplomatic initiatives, claiming they legitimate Hamas and essentially compensate the terrorist organization for the terror assault in October 2023. Regarding Paris and London's recognition of Palestine, the Israeli administration is probably going to say the same thing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Spain, including Norway and Ireland joined the 140 other UN member nations who recognize the state of Palestine last year. Israel is not recognized by many nations in Middle East and North African countries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

French officials have long warned that Paris will only recognize Palestinian statehood if it improves the peace process, but they have stated for years that Paris is on the verge of doing so. French president declared in April that it was time to take the next stage toward recognition and take part in a collaborative approach that would recognize both Israel and a Palestinian state.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Michel Duclos, a former ambassador to Syria and fellow at the Institut Montaigne, publicly recognizing a Palestinian state would now appear more like a rebuke than a step toward peace as the humanitarian catastrophe in the Gaza Strip worsens. He declared, \"It would be a condemnation of Israel.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

EU recognition of the Palestinian territory, according to Duclos, might \"inspire Arab countries to specify their requirements for normalizing relations with Israel.\" According to the French ambassador cited above, Paris hopes that during the June 17\u201320 summit in New York, Middle Eastern<\/a> governments would continue to take \u201csteps\u201d toward normalisation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The US, Israel's closest friend and biggest military supporter will ultimately determine whether or not the bloodshed in the Gaza Strip and, to a lesser extent, the West Bank is stopped. Furthermore, there is no indication that Washington is yet prepared to recognize a Palestinian state, despite EU officials pointing to a change in Trump's stance toward Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Paris lobbying EU, Britain to recognize Palestinian statehood\u00a0","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"paris-lobbying-eu-britain-to-recognize-palestinian-statehood","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7856","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7849,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content":"\n

The names of the five MEPs connected to the Huawei lobbying controversy were made public by European Parliament President Roberta Metsola on Wednesday. She announced that the EU Parliament<\/a> will vote to terminate Giusi Princi's and\u00a0 Fulvio Martusciello's immunity at the proposal of Belgium management.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Metsola also mentioned three additional EU parliamentarians who had acknowledged earlier this week that Belgian officials had approached them. MEPs Daniel Attard, Nikola Minchev, and Salvatore de Meo were among them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Eight persons have been taken into custody as a result of the inquiry thus far. These include lobbyists and Lawmakers assistants, as well as present and former Huawei workers. Although no MEPs have been taken into custody as of yet, Martusciello's name was anticipated following the arrest of his parliamentary aide in Italy in April.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to investigators, Huawei's lobbyists may have influenced lawmakers with unreported gifts and payments, such as free sports tickets, expensive presents, sizable cash transfers, and even all-expense-paid vacations to China, in return for backing for the Chinese business.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It was disclosed earlier this week that as part of a probe into Huawei's cash-for-influence operation in Brussels, Belgian prosecutors had asked the European Parliament to revoke the immunity of the five MEPs without identifying them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Prior to the revelation, De Meo, Attard, and Minchev\u2014the three MEPs who had gone public\u2014all denied any misconduct. According to De Meo, his issue concerns attending an aperitif, a social event that was not planned by Huawei. Representatives from the Huawei group were also present at the event, which was held outside the European Parliament.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The issue involving Maltese Labour MEP Daniel Attard pertains to a football game he watched in September from Huawei\u2019s box seats at the Anderlecht stadium in Belgium. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I was unaware that the invitation originated from a company or that it pertained to a corporate box. Subsequently, it became evident that the invitation was from an individual under investigation by the Belgian authorities, who aimed to discuss Huawei with me during the match,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Minchev, a Bulgarian Renew MEP, is also being investigated for going<\/a> to Huawei's box during a football game in Anderlecht. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"My presence at this event is now the reason for the management investigation into any potential issues or wrongdoing,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he told the Bulgarian press. Adam Mukhtar, Minchev's assistant, had his office raided by authorities in the middle of March.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The European Commission and European Parliament banned all Huawei lobbyists <\/a>from accessing the organisation\u2019s facilities in reaction to the controversy. Affiliates will be evaluated individually. Huawei stated it had no tolerance for corruption once the incident surfaced, but it hasn't released an official comment since. The Legal Affairs Committee of the EU Parliament will vote on withdrawing the immunity of the five lawmakers after the announcement on Wednesday.<\/p>\n","post_title":"EU integrity under pressure as Huawei-linked MEPs identified","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"eu-integrity-under-pressure-as-huawei-linked-meps-identified","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7849","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7842,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_content":"\n

A Qatari foreign agent contributed about $30,000 to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) campaign committees between 2020 and 2025. In order to support Qatar's interests<\/a>, Graham's office gave his lobbying business a lot of access during that time. This included more than 131 exchanges between the office and the agent, in-person meetings, and phone conversations with the senator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In recent years, this dynamic has been well demonstrated. According to a Washington Examiner analysis of hundreds of public records, Qatar's active foreign agents have given close to $700,000 to Congressmen and other government officials since 2020 while also having open channels of communication and face time with powerful lawmakers, frequently the same individuals they send checks to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to a 2018 scholarly study, when problems that are important to lobbyists are at the center of the political process, they boost their donations to certain committees and MPs. These lobbying payments may be driven by a desire to influence policy, as evidenced by another 2015 study that found that giving to a member of Congress improves access to their office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Andrew King, a Qatari foreign agent who made large donations to Graham's political action organizations, has more than just financial connections to the senator from South Carolina. King spent almost 20 years as a senior worker in Graham's office, where he oversaw the office's Middle Eastern affairs among other things, before starting Neale Creek, his government relations and political consulting business. In addition to his own political donations, King is the treasurer and co-founder of 150 PAC, which has given thousands of dollars to Graham and other members of Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to materials submitted to the Department of Justice, King and Neale Creek engaged in \"the promotion of business with the State of Qatar\" by using the access that congressional offices provided them. Graham's native state of South Carolina has significant investments from Qatar. However, the DOJ's Foreign Agents Registration Act database does not contain the particular papers that were exchanged between Neale Creek and congressional representatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The impact of Neale Creek goes beyond Graham's workplace. The company has met with congressional sources in person, over the phone, over email, and through text messages, and has contributed close to $180,000 to members of Congress and related PACs since 2020. With almost $225,000 in donations made since 2020, Qatari foreign agents employed by Rubin Turnbull & Associates jointly made the largest contributions to political groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Communications from other companies representing Qatar provide some information, even if it may not be quite apparent what Neale Creek and King are saying to Congressmen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, documents disseminated by Qatari foreign agents employed by Venable minimize the Gulf state's ties to terrorist groups while highlighting what Qatar considers to be the benefits of investments made by its sovereign wealth fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

\"The Arab countries prefer sanctions to statehood,\" <\/p>\n\n\n\n

a EU diplomat stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last week, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer's spokeswoman stated that the UK was prepared to collaborate with regional partners and nations to \"do what we can to support the foundations of Palestinian statehood.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In response to the Palestinians' decades-long demand, Paris and Britain would be the first G7 countries to recognize the state of Palestine. Israel has frequently attacked French diplomatic initiatives, claiming they legitimate Hamas and essentially compensate the terrorist organization for the terror assault in October 2023. Regarding Paris and London's recognition of Palestine, the Israeli administration is probably going to say the same thing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Spain, including Norway and Ireland joined the 140 other UN member nations who recognize the state of Palestine last year. Israel is not recognized by many nations in Middle East and North African countries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

French officials have long warned that Paris will only recognize Palestinian statehood if it improves the peace process, but they have stated for years that Paris is on the verge of doing so. French president declared in April that it was time to take the next stage toward recognition and take part in a collaborative approach that would recognize both Israel and a Palestinian state.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Michel Duclos, a former ambassador to Syria and fellow at the Institut Montaigne, publicly recognizing a Palestinian state would now appear more like a rebuke than a step toward peace as the humanitarian catastrophe in the Gaza Strip worsens. He declared, \"It would be a condemnation of Israel.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

EU recognition of the Palestinian territory, according to Duclos, might \"inspire Arab countries to specify their requirements for normalizing relations with Israel.\" According to the French ambassador cited above, Paris hopes that during the June 17\u201320 summit in New York, Middle Eastern<\/a> governments would continue to take \u201csteps\u201d toward normalisation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The US, Israel's closest friend and biggest military supporter will ultimately determine whether or not the bloodshed in the Gaza Strip and, to a lesser extent, the West Bank is stopped. Furthermore, there is no indication that Washington is yet prepared to recognize a Palestinian state, despite EU officials pointing to a change in Trump's stance toward Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Paris lobbying EU, Britain to recognize Palestinian statehood\u00a0","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"paris-lobbying-eu-britain-to-recognize-palestinian-statehood","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7856","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7849,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content":"\n

The names of the five MEPs connected to the Huawei lobbying controversy were made public by European Parliament President Roberta Metsola on Wednesday. She announced that the EU Parliament<\/a> will vote to terminate Giusi Princi's and\u00a0 Fulvio Martusciello's immunity at the proposal of Belgium management.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Metsola also mentioned three additional EU parliamentarians who had acknowledged earlier this week that Belgian officials had approached them. MEPs Daniel Attard, Nikola Minchev, and Salvatore de Meo were among them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Eight persons have been taken into custody as a result of the inquiry thus far. These include lobbyists and Lawmakers assistants, as well as present and former Huawei workers. Although no MEPs have been taken into custody as of yet, Martusciello's name was anticipated following the arrest of his parliamentary aide in Italy in April.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to investigators, Huawei's lobbyists may have influenced lawmakers with unreported gifts and payments, such as free sports tickets, expensive presents, sizable cash transfers, and even all-expense-paid vacations to China, in return for backing for the Chinese business.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It was disclosed earlier this week that as part of a probe into Huawei's cash-for-influence operation in Brussels, Belgian prosecutors had asked the European Parliament to revoke the immunity of the five MEPs without identifying them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Prior to the revelation, De Meo, Attard, and Minchev\u2014the three MEPs who had gone public\u2014all denied any misconduct. According to De Meo, his issue concerns attending an aperitif, a social event that was not planned by Huawei. Representatives from the Huawei group were also present at the event, which was held outside the European Parliament.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The issue involving Maltese Labour MEP Daniel Attard pertains to a football game he watched in September from Huawei\u2019s box seats at the Anderlecht stadium in Belgium. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I was unaware that the invitation originated from a company or that it pertained to a corporate box. Subsequently, it became evident that the invitation was from an individual under investigation by the Belgian authorities, who aimed to discuss Huawei with me during the match,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Minchev, a Bulgarian Renew MEP, is also being investigated for going<\/a> to Huawei's box during a football game in Anderlecht. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"My presence at this event is now the reason for the management investigation into any potential issues or wrongdoing,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he told the Bulgarian press. Adam Mukhtar, Minchev's assistant, had his office raided by authorities in the middle of March.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The European Commission and European Parliament banned all Huawei lobbyists <\/a>from accessing the organisation\u2019s facilities in reaction to the controversy. Affiliates will be evaluated individually. Huawei stated it had no tolerance for corruption once the incident surfaced, but it hasn't released an official comment since. The Legal Affairs Committee of the EU Parliament will vote on withdrawing the immunity of the five lawmakers after the announcement on Wednesday.<\/p>\n","post_title":"EU integrity under pressure as Huawei-linked MEPs identified","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"eu-integrity-under-pressure-as-huawei-linked-meps-identified","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7849","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7842,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_content":"\n

A Qatari foreign agent contributed about $30,000 to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) campaign committees between 2020 and 2025. In order to support Qatar's interests<\/a>, Graham's office gave his lobbying business a lot of access during that time. This included more than 131 exchanges between the office and the agent, in-person meetings, and phone conversations with the senator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In recent years, this dynamic has been well demonstrated. According to a Washington Examiner analysis of hundreds of public records, Qatar's active foreign agents have given close to $700,000 to Congressmen and other government officials since 2020 while also having open channels of communication and face time with powerful lawmakers, frequently the same individuals they send checks to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to a 2018 scholarly study, when problems that are important to lobbyists are at the center of the political process, they boost their donations to certain committees and MPs. These lobbying payments may be driven by a desire to influence policy, as evidenced by another 2015 study that found that giving to a member of Congress improves access to their office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Andrew King, a Qatari foreign agent who made large donations to Graham's political action organizations, has more than just financial connections to the senator from South Carolina. King spent almost 20 years as a senior worker in Graham's office, where he oversaw the office's Middle Eastern affairs among other things, before starting Neale Creek, his government relations and political consulting business. In addition to his own political donations, King is the treasurer and co-founder of 150 PAC, which has given thousands of dollars to Graham and other members of Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to materials submitted to the Department of Justice, King and Neale Creek engaged in \"the promotion of business with the State of Qatar\" by using the access that congressional offices provided them. Graham's native state of South Carolina has significant investments from Qatar. However, the DOJ's Foreign Agents Registration Act database does not contain the particular papers that were exchanged between Neale Creek and congressional representatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The impact of Neale Creek goes beyond Graham's workplace. The company has met with congressional sources in person, over the phone, over email, and through text messages, and has contributed close to $180,000 to members of Congress and related PACs since 2020. With almost $225,000 in donations made since 2020, Qatari foreign agents employed by Rubin Turnbull & Associates jointly made the largest contributions to political groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Communications from other companies representing Qatar provide some information, even if it may not be quite apparent what Neale Creek and King are saying to Congressmen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, documents disseminated by Qatari foreign agents employed by Venable minimize the Gulf state's ties to terrorist groups while highlighting what Qatar considers to be the benefits of investments made by its sovereign wealth fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

But France has been obliged to lower expectations for the conference it is co-hosting with KSA because to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza brought on by Israel's bombing campaign and its three-month siege, which severely restricts residents' access to food, water, and medicine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"The Arab countries prefer sanctions to statehood,\" <\/p>\n\n\n\n

a EU diplomat stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last week, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer's spokeswoman stated that the UK was prepared to collaborate with regional partners and nations to \"do what we can to support the foundations of Palestinian statehood.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In response to the Palestinians' decades-long demand, Paris and Britain would be the first G7 countries to recognize the state of Palestine. Israel has frequently attacked French diplomatic initiatives, claiming they legitimate Hamas and essentially compensate the terrorist organization for the terror assault in October 2023. Regarding Paris and London's recognition of Palestine, the Israeli administration is probably going to say the same thing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Spain, including Norway and Ireland joined the 140 other UN member nations who recognize the state of Palestine last year. Israel is not recognized by many nations in Middle East and North African countries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

French officials have long warned that Paris will only recognize Palestinian statehood if it improves the peace process, but they have stated for years that Paris is on the verge of doing so. French president declared in April that it was time to take the next stage toward recognition and take part in a collaborative approach that would recognize both Israel and a Palestinian state.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Michel Duclos, a former ambassador to Syria and fellow at the Institut Montaigne, publicly recognizing a Palestinian state would now appear more like a rebuke than a step toward peace as the humanitarian catastrophe in the Gaza Strip worsens. He declared, \"It would be a condemnation of Israel.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

EU recognition of the Palestinian territory, according to Duclos, might \"inspire Arab countries to specify their requirements for normalizing relations with Israel.\" According to the French ambassador cited above, Paris hopes that during the June 17\u201320 summit in New York, Middle Eastern<\/a> governments would continue to take \u201csteps\u201d toward normalisation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The US, Israel's closest friend and biggest military supporter will ultimately determine whether or not the bloodshed in the Gaza Strip and, to a lesser extent, the West Bank is stopped. Furthermore, there is no indication that Washington is yet prepared to recognize a Palestinian state, despite EU officials pointing to a change in Trump's stance toward Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Paris lobbying EU, Britain to recognize Palestinian statehood\u00a0","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"paris-lobbying-eu-britain-to-recognize-palestinian-statehood","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7856","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7849,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content":"\n

The names of the five MEPs connected to the Huawei lobbying controversy were made public by European Parliament President Roberta Metsola on Wednesday. She announced that the EU Parliament<\/a> will vote to terminate Giusi Princi's and\u00a0 Fulvio Martusciello's immunity at the proposal of Belgium management.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Metsola also mentioned three additional EU parliamentarians who had acknowledged earlier this week that Belgian officials had approached them. MEPs Daniel Attard, Nikola Minchev, and Salvatore de Meo were among them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Eight persons have been taken into custody as a result of the inquiry thus far. These include lobbyists and Lawmakers assistants, as well as present and former Huawei workers. Although no MEPs have been taken into custody as of yet, Martusciello's name was anticipated following the arrest of his parliamentary aide in Italy in April.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to investigators, Huawei's lobbyists may have influenced lawmakers with unreported gifts and payments, such as free sports tickets, expensive presents, sizable cash transfers, and even all-expense-paid vacations to China, in return for backing for the Chinese business.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It was disclosed earlier this week that as part of a probe into Huawei's cash-for-influence operation in Brussels, Belgian prosecutors had asked the European Parliament to revoke the immunity of the five MEPs without identifying them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Prior to the revelation, De Meo, Attard, and Minchev\u2014the three MEPs who had gone public\u2014all denied any misconduct. According to De Meo, his issue concerns attending an aperitif, a social event that was not planned by Huawei. Representatives from the Huawei group were also present at the event, which was held outside the European Parliament.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The issue involving Maltese Labour MEP Daniel Attard pertains to a football game he watched in September from Huawei\u2019s box seats at the Anderlecht stadium in Belgium. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I was unaware that the invitation originated from a company or that it pertained to a corporate box. Subsequently, it became evident that the invitation was from an individual under investigation by the Belgian authorities, who aimed to discuss Huawei with me during the match,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Minchev, a Bulgarian Renew MEP, is also being investigated for going<\/a> to Huawei's box during a football game in Anderlecht. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"My presence at this event is now the reason for the management investigation into any potential issues or wrongdoing,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he told the Bulgarian press. Adam Mukhtar, Minchev's assistant, had his office raided by authorities in the middle of March.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The European Commission and European Parliament banned all Huawei lobbyists <\/a>from accessing the organisation\u2019s facilities in reaction to the controversy. Affiliates will be evaluated individually. Huawei stated it had no tolerance for corruption once the incident surfaced, but it hasn't released an official comment since. The Legal Affairs Committee of the EU Parliament will vote on withdrawing the immunity of the five lawmakers after the announcement on Wednesday.<\/p>\n","post_title":"EU integrity under pressure as Huawei-linked MEPs identified","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"eu-integrity-under-pressure-as-huawei-linked-meps-identified","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7849","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7842,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_content":"\n

A Qatari foreign agent contributed about $30,000 to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) campaign committees between 2020 and 2025. In order to support Qatar's interests<\/a>, Graham's office gave his lobbying business a lot of access during that time. This included more than 131 exchanges between the office and the agent, in-person meetings, and phone conversations with the senator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In recent years, this dynamic has been well demonstrated. According to a Washington Examiner analysis of hundreds of public records, Qatar's active foreign agents have given close to $700,000 to Congressmen and other government officials since 2020 while also having open channels of communication and face time with powerful lawmakers, frequently the same individuals they send checks to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to a 2018 scholarly study, when problems that are important to lobbyists are at the center of the political process, they boost their donations to certain committees and MPs. These lobbying payments may be driven by a desire to influence policy, as evidenced by another 2015 study that found that giving to a member of Congress improves access to their office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Andrew King, a Qatari foreign agent who made large donations to Graham's political action organizations, has more than just financial connections to the senator from South Carolina. King spent almost 20 years as a senior worker in Graham's office, where he oversaw the office's Middle Eastern affairs among other things, before starting Neale Creek, his government relations and political consulting business. In addition to his own political donations, King is the treasurer and co-founder of 150 PAC, which has given thousands of dollars to Graham and other members of Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to materials submitted to the Department of Justice, King and Neale Creek engaged in \"the promotion of business with the State of Qatar\" by using the access that congressional offices provided them. Graham's native state of South Carolina has significant investments from Qatar. However, the DOJ's Foreign Agents Registration Act database does not contain the particular papers that were exchanged between Neale Creek and congressional representatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The impact of Neale Creek goes beyond Graham's workplace. The company has met with congressional sources in person, over the phone, over email, and through text messages, and has contributed close to $180,000 to members of Congress and related PACs since 2020. With almost $225,000 in donations made since 2020, Qatari foreign agents employed by Rubin Turnbull & Associates jointly made the largest contributions to political groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Communications from other companies representing Qatar provide some information, even if it may not be quite apparent what Neale Creek and King are saying to Congressmen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, documents disseminated by Qatari foreign agents employed by Venable minimize the Gulf state's ties to terrorist groups while highlighting what Qatar considers to be the benefits of investments made by its sovereign wealth fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

a French official stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But France has been obliged to lower expectations for the conference it is co-hosting with KSA because to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza brought on by Israel's bombing campaign and its three-month siege, which severely restricts residents' access to food, water, and medicine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"The Arab countries prefer sanctions to statehood,\" <\/p>\n\n\n\n

a EU diplomat stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last week, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer's spokeswoman stated that the UK was prepared to collaborate with regional partners and nations to \"do what we can to support the foundations of Palestinian statehood.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In response to the Palestinians' decades-long demand, Paris and Britain would be the first G7 countries to recognize the state of Palestine. Israel has frequently attacked French diplomatic initiatives, claiming they legitimate Hamas and essentially compensate the terrorist organization for the terror assault in October 2023. Regarding Paris and London's recognition of Palestine, the Israeli administration is probably going to say the same thing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Spain, including Norway and Ireland joined the 140 other UN member nations who recognize the state of Palestine last year. Israel is not recognized by many nations in Middle East and North African countries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

French officials have long warned that Paris will only recognize Palestinian statehood if it improves the peace process, but they have stated for years that Paris is on the verge of doing so. French president declared in April that it was time to take the next stage toward recognition and take part in a collaborative approach that would recognize both Israel and a Palestinian state.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Michel Duclos, a former ambassador to Syria and fellow at the Institut Montaigne, publicly recognizing a Palestinian state would now appear more like a rebuke than a step toward peace as the humanitarian catastrophe in the Gaza Strip worsens. He declared, \"It would be a condemnation of Israel.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

EU recognition of the Palestinian territory, according to Duclos, might \"inspire Arab countries to specify their requirements for normalizing relations with Israel.\" According to the French ambassador cited above, Paris hopes that during the June 17\u201320 summit in New York, Middle Eastern<\/a> governments would continue to take \u201csteps\u201d toward normalisation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The US, Israel's closest friend and biggest military supporter will ultimately determine whether or not the bloodshed in the Gaza Strip and, to a lesser extent, the West Bank is stopped. Furthermore, there is no indication that Washington is yet prepared to recognize a Palestinian state, despite EU officials pointing to a change in Trump's stance toward Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Paris lobbying EU, Britain to recognize Palestinian statehood\u00a0","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"paris-lobbying-eu-britain-to-recognize-palestinian-statehood","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7856","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7849,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content":"\n

The names of the five MEPs connected to the Huawei lobbying controversy were made public by European Parliament President Roberta Metsola on Wednesday. She announced that the EU Parliament<\/a> will vote to terminate Giusi Princi's and\u00a0 Fulvio Martusciello's immunity at the proposal of Belgium management.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Metsola also mentioned three additional EU parliamentarians who had acknowledged earlier this week that Belgian officials had approached them. MEPs Daniel Attard, Nikola Minchev, and Salvatore de Meo were among them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Eight persons have been taken into custody as a result of the inquiry thus far. These include lobbyists and Lawmakers assistants, as well as present and former Huawei workers. Although no MEPs have been taken into custody as of yet, Martusciello's name was anticipated following the arrest of his parliamentary aide in Italy in April.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to investigators, Huawei's lobbyists may have influenced lawmakers with unreported gifts and payments, such as free sports tickets, expensive presents, sizable cash transfers, and even all-expense-paid vacations to China, in return for backing for the Chinese business.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It was disclosed earlier this week that as part of a probe into Huawei's cash-for-influence operation in Brussels, Belgian prosecutors had asked the European Parliament to revoke the immunity of the five MEPs without identifying them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Prior to the revelation, De Meo, Attard, and Minchev\u2014the three MEPs who had gone public\u2014all denied any misconduct. According to De Meo, his issue concerns attending an aperitif, a social event that was not planned by Huawei. Representatives from the Huawei group were also present at the event, which was held outside the European Parliament.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The issue involving Maltese Labour MEP Daniel Attard pertains to a football game he watched in September from Huawei\u2019s box seats at the Anderlecht stadium in Belgium. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I was unaware that the invitation originated from a company or that it pertained to a corporate box. Subsequently, it became evident that the invitation was from an individual under investigation by the Belgian authorities, who aimed to discuss Huawei with me during the match,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Minchev, a Bulgarian Renew MEP, is also being investigated for going<\/a> to Huawei's box during a football game in Anderlecht. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"My presence at this event is now the reason for the management investigation into any potential issues or wrongdoing,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he told the Bulgarian press. Adam Mukhtar, Minchev's assistant, had his office raided by authorities in the middle of March.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The European Commission and European Parliament banned all Huawei lobbyists <\/a>from accessing the organisation\u2019s facilities in reaction to the controversy. Affiliates will be evaluated individually. Huawei stated it had no tolerance for corruption once the incident surfaced, but it hasn't released an official comment since. The Legal Affairs Committee of the EU Parliament will vote on withdrawing the immunity of the five lawmakers after the announcement on Wednesday.<\/p>\n","post_title":"EU integrity under pressure as Huawei-linked MEPs identified","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"eu-integrity-under-pressure-as-huawei-linked-meps-identified","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7849","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7842,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_content":"\n

A Qatari foreign agent contributed about $30,000 to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) campaign committees between 2020 and 2025. In order to support Qatar's interests<\/a>, Graham's office gave his lobbying business a lot of access during that time. This included more than 131 exchanges between the office and the agent, in-person meetings, and phone conversations with the senator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In recent years, this dynamic has been well demonstrated. According to a Washington Examiner analysis of hundreds of public records, Qatar's active foreign agents have given close to $700,000 to Congressmen and other government officials since 2020 while also having open channels of communication and face time with powerful lawmakers, frequently the same individuals they send checks to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to a 2018 scholarly study, when problems that are important to lobbyists are at the center of the political process, they boost their donations to certain committees and MPs. These lobbying payments may be driven by a desire to influence policy, as evidenced by another 2015 study that found that giving to a member of Congress improves access to their office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Andrew King, a Qatari foreign agent who made large donations to Graham's political action organizations, has more than just financial connections to the senator from South Carolina. King spent almost 20 years as a senior worker in Graham's office, where he oversaw the office's Middle Eastern affairs among other things, before starting Neale Creek, his government relations and political consulting business. In addition to his own political donations, King is the treasurer and co-founder of 150 PAC, which has given thousands of dollars to Graham and other members of Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to materials submitted to the Department of Justice, King and Neale Creek engaged in \"the promotion of business with the State of Qatar\" by using the access that congressional offices provided them. Graham's native state of South Carolina has significant investments from Qatar. However, the DOJ's Foreign Agents Registration Act database does not contain the particular papers that were exchanged between Neale Creek and congressional representatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The impact of Neale Creek goes beyond Graham's workplace. The company has met with congressional sources in person, over the phone, over email, and through text messages, and has contributed close to $180,000 to members of Congress and related PACs since 2020. With almost $225,000 in donations made since 2020, Qatari foreign agents employed by Rubin Turnbull & Associates jointly made the largest contributions to political groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Communications from other companies representing Qatar provide some information, even if it may not be quite apparent what Neale Creek and King are saying to Congressmen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, documents disseminated by Qatari foreign agents employed by Venable minimize the Gulf state's ties to terrorist groups while highlighting what Qatar considers to be the benefits of investments made by its sovereign wealth fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

\u201c\"The war, the displacement [of Palestinians], and the violence of extremist settlers have undermined the two-state solution more than ever before, despite the fact that it is more necessary than ever,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

a French official stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But France has been obliged to lower expectations for the conference it is co-hosting with KSA because to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza brought on by Israel's bombing campaign and its three-month siege, which severely restricts residents' access to food, water, and medicine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"The Arab countries prefer sanctions to statehood,\" <\/p>\n\n\n\n

a EU diplomat stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last week, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer's spokeswoman stated that the UK was prepared to collaborate with regional partners and nations to \"do what we can to support the foundations of Palestinian statehood.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In response to the Palestinians' decades-long demand, Paris and Britain would be the first G7 countries to recognize the state of Palestine. Israel has frequently attacked French diplomatic initiatives, claiming they legitimate Hamas and essentially compensate the terrorist organization for the terror assault in October 2023. Regarding Paris and London's recognition of Palestine, the Israeli administration is probably going to say the same thing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Spain, including Norway and Ireland joined the 140 other UN member nations who recognize the state of Palestine last year. Israel is not recognized by many nations in Middle East and North African countries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

French officials have long warned that Paris will only recognize Palestinian statehood if it improves the peace process, but they have stated for years that Paris is on the verge of doing so. French president declared in April that it was time to take the next stage toward recognition and take part in a collaborative approach that would recognize both Israel and a Palestinian state.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Michel Duclos, a former ambassador to Syria and fellow at the Institut Montaigne, publicly recognizing a Palestinian state would now appear more like a rebuke than a step toward peace as the humanitarian catastrophe in the Gaza Strip worsens. He declared, \"It would be a condemnation of Israel.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

EU recognition of the Palestinian territory, according to Duclos, might \"inspire Arab countries to specify their requirements for normalizing relations with Israel.\" According to the French ambassador cited above, Paris hopes that during the June 17\u201320 summit in New York, Middle Eastern<\/a> governments would continue to take \u201csteps\u201d toward normalisation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The US, Israel's closest friend and biggest military supporter will ultimately determine whether or not the bloodshed in the Gaza Strip and, to a lesser extent, the West Bank is stopped. Furthermore, there is no indication that Washington is yet prepared to recognize a Palestinian state, despite EU officials pointing to a change in Trump's stance toward Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Paris lobbying EU, Britain to recognize Palestinian statehood\u00a0","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"paris-lobbying-eu-britain-to-recognize-palestinian-statehood","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7856","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7849,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content":"\n

The names of the five MEPs connected to the Huawei lobbying controversy were made public by European Parliament President Roberta Metsola on Wednesday. She announced that the EU Parliament<\/a> will vote to terminate Giusi Princi's and\u00a0 Fulvio Martusciello's immunity at the proposal of Belgium management.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Metsola also mentioned three additional EU parliamentarians who had acknowledged earlier this week that Belgian officials had approached them. MEPs Daniel Attard, Nikola Minchev, and Salvatore de Meo were among them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Eight persons have been taken into custody as a result of the inquiry thus far. These include lobbyists and Lawmakers assistants, as well as present and former Huawei workers. Although no MEPs have been taken into custody as of yet, Martusciello's name was anticipated following the arrest of his parliamentary aide in Italy in April.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to investigators, Huawei's lobbyists may have influenced lawmakers with unreported gifts and payments, such as free sports tickets, expensive presents, sizable cash transfers, and even all-expense-paid vacations to China, in return for backing for the Chinese business.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It was disclosed earlier this week that as part of a probe into Huawei's cash-for-influence operation in Brussels, Belgian prosecutors had asked the European Parliament to revoke the immunity of the five MEPs without identifying them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Prior to the revelation, De Meo, Attard, and Minchev\u2014the three MEPs who had gone public\u2014all denied any misconduct. According to De Meo, his issue concerns attending an aperitif, a social event that was not planned by Huawei. Representatives from the Huawei group were also present at the event, which was held outside the European Parliament.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The issue involving Maltese Labour MEP Daniel Attard pertains to a football game he watched in September from Huawei\u2019s box seats at the Anderlecht stadium in Belgium. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I was unaware that the invitation originated from a company or that it pertained to a corporate box. Subsequently, it became evident that the invitation was from an individual under investigation by the Belgian authorities, who aimed to discuss Huawei with me during the match,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Minchev, a Bulgarian Renew MEP, is also being investigated for going<\/a> to Huawei's box during a football game in Anderlecht. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"My presence at this event is now the reason for the management investigation into any potential issues or wrongdoing,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he told the Bulgarian press. Adam Mukhtar, Minchev's assistant, had his office raided by authorities in the middle of March.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The European Commission and European Parliament banned all Huawei lobbyists <\/a>from accessing the organisation\u2019s facilities in reaction to the controversy. Affiliates will be evaluated individually. Huawei stated it had no tolerance for corruption once the incident surfaced, but it hasn't released an official comment since. The Legal Affairs Committee of the EU Parliament will vote on withdrawing the immunity of the five lawmakers after the announcement on Wednesday.<\/p>\n","post_title":"EU integrity under pressure as Huawei-linked MEPs identified","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"eu-integrity-under-pressure-as-huawei-linked-meps-identified","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7849","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7842,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_content":"\n

A Qatari foreign agent contributed about $30,000 to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) campaign committees between 2020 and 2025. In order to support Qatar's interests<\/a>, Graham's office gave his lobbying business a lot of access during that time. This included more than 131 exchanges between the office and the agent, in-person meetings, and phone conversations with the senator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In recent years, this dynamic has been well demonstrated. According to a Washington Examiner analysis of hundreds of public records, Qatar's active foreign agents have given close to $700,000 to Congressmen and other government officials since 2020 while also having open channels of communication and face time with powerful lawmakers, frequently the same individuals they send checks to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to a 2018 scholarly study, when problems that are important to lobbyists are at the center of the political process, they boost their donations to certain committees and MPs. These lobbying payments may be driven by a desire to influence policy, as evidenced by another 2015 study that found that giving to a member of Congress improves access to their office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Andrew King, a Qatari foreign agent who made large donations to Graham's political action organizations, has more than just financial connections to the senator from South Carolina. King spent almost 20 years as a senior worker in Graham's office, where he oversaw the office's Middle Eastern affairs among other things, before starting Neale Creek, his government relations and political consulting business. In addition to his own political donations, King is the treasurer and co-founder of 150 PAC, which has given thousands of dollars to Graham and other members of Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to materials submitted to the Department of Justice, King and Neale Creek engaged in \"the promotion of business with the State of Qatar\" by using the access that congressional offices provided them. Graham's native state of South Carolina has significant investments from Qatar. However, the DOJ's Foreign Agents Registration Act database does not contain the particular papers that were exchanged between Neale Creek and congressional representatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The impact of Neale Creek goes beyond Graham's workplace. The company has met with congressional sources in person, over the phone, over email, and through text messages, and has contributed close to $180,000 to members of Congress and related PACs since 2020. With almost $225,000 in donations made since 2020, Qatari foreign agents employed by Rubin Turnbull & Associates jointly made the largest contributions to political groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Communications from other companies representing Qatar provide some information, even if it may not be quite apparent what Neale Creek and King are saying to Congressmen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, documents disseminated by Qatari foreign agents employed by Venable minimize the Gulf state's ties to terrorist groups while highlighting what Qatar considers to be the benefits of investments made by its sovereign wealth fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n
\n

\u201c\"The war, the displacement [of Palestinians], and the violence of extremist settlers have undermined the two-state solution more than ever before, despite the fact that it is more necessary than ever,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

a French official stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But France has been obliged to lower expectations for the conference it is co-hosting with KSA because to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza brought on by Israel's bombing campaign and its three-month siege, which severely restricts residents' access to food, water, and medicine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"The Arab countries prefer sanctions to statehood,\" <\/p>\n\n\n\n

a EU diplomat stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last week, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer's spokeswoman stated that the UK was prepared to collaborate with regional partners and nations to \"do what we can to support the foundations of Palestinian statehood.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In response to the Palestinians' decades-long demand, Paris and Britain would be the first G7 countries to recognize the state of Palestine. Israel has frequently attacked French diplomatic initiatives, claiming they legitimate Hamas and essentially compensate the terrorist organization for the terror assault in October 2023. Regarding Paris and London's recognition of Palestine, the Israeli administration is probably going to say the same thing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Spain, including Norway and Ireland joined the 140 other UN member nations who recognize the state of Palestine last year. Israel is not recognized by many nations in Middle East and North African countries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

French officials have long warned that Paris will only recognize Palestinian statehood if it improves the peace process, but they have stated for years that Paris is on the verge of doing so. French president declared in April that it was time to take the next stage toward recognition and take part in a collaborative approach that would recognize both Israel and a Palestinian state.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Michel Duclos, a former ambassador to Syria and fellow at the Institut Montaigne, publicly recognizing a Palestinian state would now appear more like a rebuke than a step toward peace as the humanitarian catastrophe in the Gaza Strip worsens. He declared, \"It would be a condemnation of Israel.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

EU recognition of the Palestinian territory, according to Duclos, might \"inspire Arab countries to specify their requirements for normalizing relations with Israel.\" According to the French ambassador cited above, Paris hopes that during the June 17\u201320 summit in New York, Middle Eastern<\/a> governments would continue to take \u201csteps\u201d toward normalisation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The US, Israel's closest friend and biggest military supporter will ultimately determine whether or not the bloodshed in the Gaza Strip and, to a lesser extent, the West Bank is stopped. Furthermore, there is no indication that Washington is yet prepared to recognize a Palestinian state, despite EU officials pointing to a change in Trump's stance toward Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Paris lobbying EU, Britain to recognize Palestinian statehood\u00a0","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"paris-lobbying-eu-britain-to-recognize-palestinian-statehood","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7856","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7849,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content":"\n

The names of the five MEPs connected to the Huawei lobbying controversy were made public by European Parliament President Roberta Metsola on Wednesday. She announced that the EU Parliament<\/a> will vote to terminate Giusi Princi's and\u00a0 Fulvio Martusciello's immunity at the proposal of Belgium management.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Metsola also mentioned three additional EU parliamentarians who had acknowledged earlier this week that Belgian officials had approached them. MEPs Daniel Attard, Nikola Minchev, and Salvatore de Meo were among them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Eight persons have been taken into custody as a result of the inquiry thus far. These include lobbyists and Lawmakers assistants, as well as present and former Huawei workers. Although no MEPs have been taken into custody as of yet, Martusciello's name was anticipated following the arrest of his parliamentary aide in Italy in April.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to investigators, Huawei's lobbyists may have influenced lawmakers with unreported gifts and payments, such as free sports tickets, expensive presents, sizable cash transfers, and even all-expense-paid vacations to China, in return for backing for the Chinese business.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It was disclosed earlier this week that as part of a probe into Huawei's cash-for-influence operation in Brussels, Belgian prosecutors had asked the European Parliament to revoke the immunity of the five MEPs without identifying them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Prior to the revelation, De Meo, Attard, and Minchev\u2014the three MEPs who had gone public\u2014all denied any misconduct. According to De Meo, his issue concerns attending an aperitif, a social event that was not planned by Huawei. Representatives from the Huawei group were also present at the event, which was held outside the European Parliament.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The issue involving Maltese Labour MEP Daniel Attard pertains to a football game he watched in September from Huawei\u2019s box seats at the Anderlecht stadium in Belgium. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I was unaware that the invitation originated from a company or that it pertained to a corporate box. Subsequently, it became evident that the invitation was from an individual under investigation by the Belgian authorities, who aimed to discuss Huawei with me during the match,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Minchev, a Bulgarian Renew MEP, is also being investigated for going<\/a> to Huawei's box during a football game in Anderlecht. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"My presence at this event is now the reason for the management investigation into any potential issues or wrongdoing,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he told the Bulgarian press. Adam Mukhtar, Minchev's assistant, had his office raided by authorities in the middle of March.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The European Commission and European Parliament banned all Huawei lobbyists <\/a>from accessing the organisation\u2019s facilities in reaction to the controversy. Affiliates will be evaluated individually. Huawei stated it had no tolerance for corruption once the incident surfaced, but it hasn't released an official comment since. The Legal Affairs Committee of the EU Parliament will vote on withdrawing the immunity of the five lawmakers after the announcement on Wednesday.<\/p>\n","post_title":"EU integrity under pressure as Huawei-linked MEPs identified","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"eu-integrity-under-pressure-as-huawei-linked-meps-identified","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7849","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7842,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_content":"\n

A Qatari foreign agent contributed about $30,000 to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) campaign committees between 2020 and 2025. In order to support Qatar's interests<\/a>, Graham's office gave his lobbying business a lot of access during that time. This included more than 131 exchanges between the office and the agent, in-person meetings, and phone conversations with the senator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In recent years, this dynamic has been well demonstrated. According to a Washington Examiner analysis of hundreds of public records, Qatar's active foreign agents have given close to $700,000 to Congressmen and other government officials since 2020 while also having open channels of communication and face time with powerful lawmakers, frequently the same individuals they send checks to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to a 2018 scholarly study, when problems that are important to lobbyists are at the center of the political process, they boost their donations to certain committees and MPs. These lobbying payments may be driven by a desire to influence policy, as evidenced by another 2015 study that found that giving to a member of Congress improves access to their office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Andrew King, a Qatari foreign agent who made large donations to Graham's political action organizations, has more than just financial connections to the senator from South Carolina. King spent almost 20 years as a senior worker in Graham's office, where he oversaw the office's Middle Eastern affairs among other things, before starting Neale Creek, his government relations and political consulting business. In addition to his own political donations, King is the treasurer and co-founder of 150 PAC, which has given thousands of dollars to Graham and other members of Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to materials submitted to the Department of Justice, King and Neale Creek engaged in \"the promotion of business with the State of Qatar\" by using the access that congressional offices provided them. Graham's native state of South Carolina has significant investments from Qatar. However, the DOJ's Foreign Agents Registration Act database does not contain the particular papers that were exchanged between Neale Creek and congressional representatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The impact of Neale Creek goes beyond Graham's workplace. The company has met with congressional sources in person, over the phone, over email, and through text messages, and has contributed close to $180,000 to members of Congress and related PACs since 2020. With almost $225,000 in donations made since 2020, Qatari foreign agents employed by Rubin Turnbull & Associates jointly made the largest contributions to political groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Communications from other companies representing Qatar provide some information, even if it may not be quite apparent what Neale Creek and King are saying to Congressmen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, documents disseminated by Qatari foreign agents employed by Venable minimize the Gulf state's ties to terrorist groups while highlighting what Qatar considers to be the benefits of investments made by its sovereign wealth fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

By having some European countries<\/a> formally recognize Palestinian statehood and several Middle Eastern states formally recognize Israel, French President Emmanuel Macron had planned to utilize the occasion to kickstart peace negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201c\"The war, the displacement [of Palestinians], and the violence of extremist settlers have undermined the two-state solution more than ever before, despite the fact that it is more necessary than ever,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

a French official stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But France has been obliged to lower expectations for the conference it is co-hosting with KSA because to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza brought on by Israel's bombing campaign and its three-month siege, which severely restricts residents' access to food, water, and medicine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"The Arab countries prefer sanctions to statehood,\" <\/p>\n\n\n\n

a EU diplomat stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last week, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer's spokeswoman stated that the UK was prepared to collaborate with regional partners and nations to \"do what we can to support the foundations of Palestinian statehood.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In response to the Palestinians' decades-long demand, Paris and Britain would be the first G7 countries to recognize the state of Palestine. Israel has frequently attacked French diplomatic initiatives, claiming they legitimate Hamas and essentially compensate the terrorist organization for the terror assault in October 2023. Regarding Paris and London's recognition of Palestine, the Israeli administration is probably going to say the same thing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Spain, including Norway and Ireland joined the 140 other UN member nations who recognize the state of Palestine last year. Israel is not recognized by many nations in Middle East and North African countries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

French officials have long warned that Paris will only recognize Palestinian statehood if it improves the peace process, but they have stated for years that Paris is on the verge of doing so. French president declared in April that it was time to take the next stage toward recognition and take part in a collaborative approach that would recognize both Israel and a Palestinian state.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Michel Duclos, a former ambassador to Syria and fellow at the Institut Montaigne, publicly recognizing a Palestinian state would now appear more like a rebuke than a step toward peace as the humanitarian catastrophe in the Gaza Strip worsens. He declared, \"It would be a condemnation of Israel.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

EU recognition of the Palestinian territory, according to Duclos, might \"inspire Arab countries to specify their requirements for normalizing relations with Israel.\" According to the French ambassador cited above, Paris hopes that during the June 17\u201320 summit in New York, Middle Eastern<\/a> governments would continue to take \u201csteps\u201d toward normalisation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The US, Israel's closest friend and biggest military supporter will ultimately determine whether or not the bloodshed in the Gaza Strip and, to a lesser extent, the West Bank is stopped. Furthermore, there is no indication that Washington is yet prepared to recognize a Palestinian state, despite EU officials pointing to a change in Trump's stance toward Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Paris lobbying EU, Britain to recognize Palestinian statehood\u00a0","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"paris-lobbying-eu-britain-to-recognize-palestinian-statehood","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7856","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7849,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content":"\n

The names of the five MEPs connected to the Huawei lobbying controversy were made public by European Parliament President Roberta Metsola on Wednesday. She announced that the EU Parliament<\/a> will vote to terminate Giusi Princi's and\u00a0 Fulvio Martusciello's immunity at the proposal of Belgium management.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Metsola also mentioned three additional EU parliamentarians who had acknowledged earlier this week that Belgian officials had approached them. MEPs Daniel Attard, Nikola Minchev, and Salvatore de Meo were among them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Eight persons have been taken into custody as a result of the inquiry thus far. These include lobbyists and Lawmakers assistants, as well as present and former Huawei workers. Although no MEPs have been taken into custody as of yet, Martusciello's name was anticipated following the arrest of his parliamentary aide in Italy in April.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to investigators, Huawei's lobbyists may have influenced lawmakers with unreported gifts and payments, such as free sports tickets, expensive presents, sizable cash transfers, and even all-expense-paid vacations to China, in return for backing for the Chinese business.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It was disclosed earlier this week that as part of a probe into Huawei's cash-for-influence operation in Brussels, Belgian prosecutors had asked the European Parliament to revoke the immunity of the five MEPs without identifying them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Prior to the revelation, De Meo, Attard, and Minchev\u2014the three MEPs who had gone public\u2014all denied any misconduct. According to De Meo, his issue concerns attending an aperitif, a social event that was not planned by Huawei. Representatives from the Huawei group were also present at the event, which was held outside the European Parliament.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The issue involving Maltese Labour MEP Daniel Attard pertains to a football game he watched in September from Huawei\u2019s box seats at the Anderlecht stadium in Belgium. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I was unaware that the invitation originated from a company or that it pertained to a corporate box. Subsequently, it became evident that the invitation was from an individual under investigation by the Belgian authorities, who aimed to discuss Huawei with me during the match,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Minchev, a Bulgarian Renew MEP, is also being investigated for going<\/a> to Huawei's box during a football game in Anderlecht. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"My presence at this event is now the reason for the management investigation into any potential issues or wrongdoing,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he told the Bulgarian press. Adam Mukhtar, Minchev's assistant, had his office raided by authorities in the middle of March.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The European Commission and European Parliament banned all Huawei lobbyists <\/a>from accessing the organisation\u2019s facilities in reaction to the controversy. Affiliates will be evaluated individually. Huawei stated it had no tolerance for corruption once the incident surfaced, but it hasn't released an official comment since. The Legal Affairs Committee of the EU Parliament will vote on withdrawing the immunity of the five lawmakers after the announcement on Wednesday.<\/p>\n","post_title":"EU integrity under pressure as Huawei-linked MEPs identified","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"eu-integrity-under-pressure-as-huawei-linked-meps-identified","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7849","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7842,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_content":"\n

A Qatari foreign agent contributed about $30,000 to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) campaign committees between 2020 and 2025. In order to support Qatar's interests<\/a>, Graham's office gave his lobbying business a lot of access during that time. This included more than 131 exchanges between the office and the agent, in-person meetings, and phone conversations with the senator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In recent years, this dynamic has been well demonstrated. According to a Washington Examiner analysis of hundreds of public records, Qatar's active foreign agents have given close to $700,000 to Congressmen and other government officials since 2020 while also having open channels of communication and face time with powerful lawmakers, frequently the same individuals they send checks to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to a 2018 scholarly study, when problems that are important to lobbyists are at the center of the political process, they boost their donations to certain committees and MPs. These lobbying payments may be driven by a desire to influence policy, as evidenced by another 2015 study that found that giving to a member of Congress improves access to their office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Andrew King, a Qatari foreign agent who made large donations to Graham's political action organizations, has more than just financial connections to the senator from South Carolina. King spent almost 20 years as a senior worker in Graham's office, where he oversaw the office's Middle Eastern affairs among other things, before starting Neale Creek, his government relations and political consulting business. In addition to his own political donations, King is the treasurer and co-founder of 150 PAC, which has given thousands of dollars to Graham and other members of Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to materials submitted to the Department of Justice, King and Neale Creek engaged in \"the promotion of business with the State of Qatar\" by using the access that congressional offices provided them. Graham's native state of South Carolina has significant investments from Qatar. However, the DOJ's Foreign Agents Registration Act database does not contain the particular papers that were exchanged between Neale Creek and congressional representatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The impact of Neale Creek goes beyond Graham's workplace. The company has met with congressional sources in person, over the phone, over email, and through text messages, and has contributed close to $180,000 to members of Congress and related PACs since 2020. With almost $225,000 in donations made since 2020, Qatari foreign agents employed by Rubin Turnbull & Associates jointly made the largest contributions to political groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Communications from other companies representing Qatar provide some information, even if it may not be quite apparent what Neale Creek and King are saying to Congressmen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, documents disseminated by Qatari foreign agents employed by Venable minimize the Gulf state's ties to terrorist groups while highlighting what Qatar considers to be the benefits of investments made by its sovereign wealth fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

At a UN summit next month, France has been pressuring EU nations including the UK, the Netherlands, and Belgium to collectively recognize the state of Palestine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

By having some European countries<\/a> formally recognize Palestinian statehood and several Middle Eastern states formally recognize Israel, French President Emmanuel Macron had planned to utilize the occasion to kickstart peace negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201c\"The war, the displacement [of Palestinians], and the violence of extremist settlers have undermined the two-state solution more than ever before, despite the fact that it is more necessary than ever,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

a French official stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But France has been obliged to lower expectations for the conference it is co-hosting with KSA because to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza brought on by Israel's bombing campaign and its three-month siege, which severely restricts residents' access to food, water, and medicine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"The Arab countries prefer sanctions to statehood,\" <\/p>\n\n\n\n

a EU diplomat stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last week, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer's spokeswoman stated that the UK was prepared to collaborate with regional partners and nations to \"do what we can to support the foundations of Palestinian statehood.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In response to the Palestinians' decades-long demand, Paris and Britain would be the first G7 countries to recognize the state of Palestine. Israel has frequently attacked French diplomatic initiatives, claiming they legitimate Hamas and essentially compensate the terrorist organization for the terror assault in October 2023. Regarding Paris and London's recognition of Palestine, the Israeli administration is probably going to say the same thing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Spain, including Norway and Ireland joined the 140 other UN member nations who recognize the state of Palestine last year. Israel is not recognized by many nations in Middle East and North African countries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

French officials have long warned that Paris will only recognize Palestinian statehood if it improves the peace process, but they have stated for years that Paris is on the verge of doing so. French president declared in April that it was time to take the next stage toward recognition and take part in a collaborative approach that would recognize both Israel and a Palestinian state.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Michel Duclos, a former ambassador to Syria and fellow at the Institut Montaigne, publicly recognizing a Palestinian state would now appear more like a rebuke than a step toward peace as the humanitarian catastrophe in the Gaza Strip worsens. He declared, \"It would be a condemnation of Israel.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

EU recognition of the Palestinian territory, according to Duclos, might \"inspire Arab countries to specify their requirements for normalizing relations with Israel.\" According to the French ambassador cited above, Paris hopes that during the June 17\u201320 summit in New York, Middle Eastern<\/a> governments would continue to take \u201csteps\u201d toward normalisation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The US, Israel's closest friend and biggest military supporter will ultimately determine whether or not the bloodshed in the Gaza Strip and, to a lesser extent, the West Bank is stopped. Furthermore, there is no indication that Washington is yet prepared to recognize a Palestinian state, despite EU officials pointing to a change in Trump's stance toward Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Paris lobbying EU, Britain to recognize Palestinian statehood\u00a0","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"paris-lobbying-eu-britain-to-recognize-palestinian-statehood","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7856","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7849,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content":"\n

The names of the five MEPs connected to the Huawei lobbying controversy were made public by European Parliament President Roberta Metsola on Wednesday. She announced that the EU Parliament<\/a> will vote to terminate Giusi Princi's and\u00a0 Fulvio Martusciello's immunity at the proposal of Belgium management.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Metsola also mentioned three additional EU parliamentarians who had acknowledged earlier this week that Belgian officials had approached them. MEPs Daniel Attard, Nikola Minchev, and Salvatore de Meo were among them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Eight persons have been taken into custody as a result of the inquiry thus far. These include lobbyists and Lawmakers assistants, as well as present and former Huawei workers. Although no MEPs have been taken into custody as of yet, Martusciello's name was anticipated following the arrest of his parliamentary aide in Italy in April.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to investigators, Huawei's lobbyists may have influenced lawmakers with unreported gifts and payments, such as free sports tickets, expensive presents, sizable cash transfers, and even all-expense-paid vacations to China, in return for backing for the Chinese business.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It was disclosed earlier this week that as part of a probe into Huawei's cash-for-influence operation in Brussels, Belgian prosecutors had asked the European Parliament to revoke the immunity of the five MEPs without identifying them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Prior to the revelation, De Meo, Attard, and Minchev\u2014the three MEPs who had gone public\u2014all denied any misconduct. According to De Meo, his issue concerns attending an aperitif, a social event that was not planned by Huawei. Representatives from the Huawei group were also present at the event, which was held outside the European Parliament.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The issue involving Maltese Labour MEP Daniel Attard pertains to a football game he watched in September from Huawei\u2019s box seats at the Anderlecht stadium in Belgium. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I was unaware that the invitation originated from a company or that it pertained to a corporate box. Subsequently, it became evident that the invitation was from an individual under investigation by the Belgian authorities, who aimed to discuss Huawei with me during the match,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Minchev, a Bulgarian Renew MEP, is also being investigated for going<\/a> to Huawei's box during a football game in Anderlecht. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"My presence at this event is now the reason for the management investigation into any potential issues or wrongdoing,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he told the Bulgarian press. Adam Mukhtar, Minchev's assistant, had his office raided by authorities in the middle of March.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The European Commission and European Parliament banned all Huawei lobbyists <\/a>from accessing the organisation\u2019s facilities in reaction to the controversy. Affiliates will be evaluated individually. Huawei stated it had no tolerance for corruption once the incident surfaced, but it hasn't released an official comment since. The Legal Affairs Committee of the EU Parliament will vote on withdrawing the immunity of the five lawmakers after the announcement on Wednesday.<\/p>\n","post_title":"EU integrity under pressure as Huawei-linked MEPs identified","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"eu-integrity-under-pressure-as-huawei-linked-meps-identified","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7849","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7842,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_content":"\n

A Qatari foreign agent contributed about $30,000 to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) campaign committees between 2020 and 2025. In order to support Qatar's interests<\/a>, Graham's office gave his lobbying business a lot of access during that time. This included more than 131 exchanges between the office and the agent, in-person meetings, and phone conversations with the senator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In recent years, this dynamic has been well demonstrated. According to a Washington Examiner analysis of hundreds of public records, Qatar's active foreign agents have given close to $700,000 to Congressmen and other government officials since 2020 while also having open channels of communication and face time with powerful lawmakers, frequently the same individuals they send checks to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to a 2018 scholarly study, when problems that are important to lobbyists are at the center of the political process, they boost their donations to certain committees and MPs. These lobbying payments may be driven by a desire to influence policy, as evidenced by another 2015 study that found that giving to a member of Congress improves access to their office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Andrew King, a Qatari foreign agent who made large donations to Graham's political action organizations, has more than just financial connections to the senator from South Carolina. King spent almost 20 years as a senior worker in Graham's office, where he oversaw the office's Middle Eastern affairs among other things, before starting Neale Creek, his government relations and political consulting business. In addition to his own political donations, King is the treasurer and co-founder of 150 PAC, which has given thousands of dollars to Graham and other members of Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to materials submitted to the Department of Justice, King and Neale Creek engaged in \"the promotion of business with the State of Qatar\" by using the access that congressional offices provided them. Graham's native state of South Carolina has significant investments from Qatar. However, the DOJ's Foreign Agents Registration Act database does not contain the particular papers that were exchanged between Neale Creek and congressional representatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The impact of Neale Creek goes beyond Graham's workplace. The company has met with congressional sources in person, over the phone, over email, and through text messages, and has contributed close to $180,000 to members of Congress and related PACs since 2020. With almost $225,000 in donations made since 2020, Qatari foreign agents employed by Rubin Turnbull & Associates jointly made the largest contributions to political groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Communications from other companies representing Qatar provide some information, even if it may not be quite apparent what Neale Creek and King are saying to Congressmen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, documents disseminated by Qatari foreign agents employed by Venable minimize the Gulf state's ties to terrorist groups while highlighting what Qatar considers to be the benefits of investments made by its sovereign wealth fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Moreover, the warming attitude toward crypto in India is partly attributed to ongoing trade negotiations and closer economic ties with the United States. New Delhi policymakers are encouraged to link more near with US regulatory trends to attract foreign investment and foster innovation in the digital asset space. This alignment is encouraging India\u2019s crypto sector to intensify lobbying efforts in the U.S. to gain support for tax reforms and regulatory clarity that could benefit both countries\u2019 crypto markets.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Crypto lobby gains momentum in India as U.S. trade talks influence policy","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"crypto-lobby-gains-momentum-in-india-as-u-s-trade-talks-influence-policy","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 20:51:38","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 20:51:38","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7914","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7856,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-27 18:51:24","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-27 18:51:24","post_content":"\n

At a UN summit next month, France has been pressuring EU nations including the UK, the Netherlands, and Belgium to collectively recognize the state of Palestine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

By having some European countries<\/a> formally recognize Palestinian statehood and several Middle Eastern states formally recognize Israel, French President Emmanuel Macron had planned to utilize the occasion to kickstart peace negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201c\"The war, the displacement [of Palestinians], and the violence of extremist settlers have undermined the two-state solution more than ever before, despite the fact that it is more necessary than ever,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

a French official stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But France has been obliged to lower expectations for the conference it is co-hosting with KSA because to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza brought on by Israel's bombing campaign and its three-month siege, which severely restricts residents' access to food, water, and medicine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"The Arab countries prefer sanctions to statehood,\" <\/p>\n\n\n\n

a EU diplomat stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last week, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer's spokeswoman stated that the UK was prepared to collaborate with regional partners and nations to \"do what we can to support the foundations of Palestinian statehood.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In response to the Palestinians' decades-long demand, Paris and Britain would be the first G7 countries to recognize the state of Palestine. Israel has frequently attacked French diplomatic initiatives, claiming they legitimate Hamas and essentially compensate the terrorist organization for the terror assault in October 2023. Regarding Paris and London's recognition of Palestine, the Israeli administration is probably going to say the same thing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Spain, including Norway and Ireland joined the 140 other UN member nations who recognize the state of Palestine last year. Israel is not recognized by many nations in Middle East and North African countries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

French officials have long warned that Paris will only recognize Palestinian statehood if it improves the peace process, but they have stated for years that Paris is on the verge of doing so. French president declared in April that it was time to take the next stage toward recognition and take part in a collaborative approach that would recognize both Israel and a Palestinian state.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Michel Duclos, a former ambassador to Syria and fellow at the Institut Montaigne, publicly recognizing a Palestinian state would now appear more like a rebuke than a step toward peace as the humanitarian catastrophe in the Gaza Strip worsens. He declared, \"It would be a condemnation of Israel.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

EU recognition of the Palestinian territory, according to Duclos, might \"inspire Arab countries to specify their requirements for normalizing relations with Israel.\" According to the French ambassador cited above, Paris hopes that during the June 17\u201320 summit in New York, Middle Eastern<\/a> governments would continue to take \u201csteps\u201d toward normalisation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The US, Israel's closest friend and biggest military supporter will ultimately determine whether or not the bloodshed in the Gaza Strip and, to a lesser extent, the West Bank is stopped. Furthermore, there is no indication that Washington is yet prepared to recognize a Palestinian state, despite EU officials pointing to a change in Trump's stance toward Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Paris lobbying EU, Britain to recognize Palestinian statehood\u00a0","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"paris-lobbying-eu-britain-to-recognize-palestinian-statehood","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7856","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7849,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content":"\n

The names of the five MEPs connected to the Huawei lobbying controversy were made public by European Parliament President Roberta Metsola on Wednesday. She announced that the EU Parliament<\/a> will vote to terminate Giusi Princi's and\u00a0 Fulvio Martusciello's immunity at the proposal of Belgium management.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Metsola also mentioned three additional EU parliamentarians who had acknowledged earlier this week that Belgian officials had approached them. MEPs Daniel Attard, Nikola Minchev, and Salvatore de Meo were among them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Eight persons have been taken into custody as a result of the inquiry thus far. These include lobbyists and Lawmakers assistants, as well as present and former Huawei workers. Although no MEPs have been taken into custody as of yet, Martusciello's name was anticipated following the arrest of his parliamentary aide in Italy in April.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to investigators, Huawei's lobbyists may have influenced lawmakers with unreported gifts and payments, such as free sports tickets, expensive presents, sizable cash transfers, and even all-expense-paid vacations to China, in return for backing for the Chinese business.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It was disclosed earlier this week that as part of a probe into Huawei's cash-for-influence operation in Brussels, Belgian prosecutors had asked the European Parliament to revoke the immunity of the five MEPs without identifying them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Prior to the revelation, De Meo, Attard, and Minchev\u2014the three MEPs who had gone public\u2014all denied any misconduct. According to De Meo, his issue concerns attending an aperitif, a social event that was not planned by Huawei. Representatives from the Huawei group were also present at the event, which was held outside the European Parliament.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The issue involving Maltese Labour MEP Daniel Attard pertains to a football game he watched in September from Huawei\u2019s box seats at the Anderlecht stadium in Belgium. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I was unaware that the invitation originated from a company or that it pertained to a corporate box. Subsequently, it became evident that the invitation was from an individual under investigation by the Belgian authorities, who aimed to discuss Huawei with me during the match,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Minchev, a Bulgarian Renew MEP, is also being investigated for going<\/a> to Huawei's box during a football game in Anderlecht. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"My presence at this event is now the reason for the management investigation into any potential issues or wrongdoing,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he told the Bulgarian press. Adam Mukhtar, Minchev's assistant, had his office raided by authorities in the middle of March.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The European Commission and European Parliament banned all Huawei lobbyists <\/a>from accessing the organisation\u2019s facilities in reaction to the controversy. Affiliates will be evaluated individually. Huawei stated it had no tolerance for corruption once the incident surfaced, but it hasn't released an official comment since. The Legal Affairs Committee of the EU Parliament will vote on withdrawing the immunity of the five lawmakers after the announcement on Wednesday.<\/p>\n","post_title":"EU integrity under pressure as Huawei-linked MEPs identified","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"eu-integrity-under-pressure-as-huawei-linked-meps-identified","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7849","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7842,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_content":"\n

A Qatari foreign agent contributed about $30,000 to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) campaign committees between 2020 and 2025. In order to support Qatar's interests<\/a>, Graham's office gave his lobbying business a lot of access during that time. This included more than 131 exchanges between the office and the agent, in-person meetings, and phone conversations with the senator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In recent years, this dynamic has been well demonstrated. According to a Washington Examiner analysis of hundreds of public records, Qatar's active foreign agents have given close to $700,000 to Congressmen and other government officials since 2020 while also having open channels of communication and face time with powerful lawmakers, frequently the same individuals they send checks to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to a 2018 scholarly study, when problems that are important to lobbyists are at the center of the political process, they boost their donations to certain committees and MPs. These lobbying payments may be driven by a desire to influence policy, as evidenced by another 2015 study that found that giving to a member of Congress improves access to their office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Andrew King, a Qatari foreign agent who made large donations to Graham's political action organizations, has more than just financial connections to the senator from South Carolina. King spent almost 20 years as a senior worker in Graham's office, where he oversaw the office's Middle Eastern affairs among other things, before starting Neale Creek, his government relations and political consulting business. In addition to his own political donations, King is the treasurer and co-founder of 150 PAC, which has given thousands of dollars to Graham and other members of Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to materials submitted to the Department of Justice, King and Neale Creek engaged in \"the promotion of business with the State of Qatar\" by using the access that congressional offices provided them. Graham's native state of South Carolina has significant investments from Qatar. However, the DOJ's Foreign Agents Registration Act database does not contain the particular papers that were exchanged between Neale Creek and congressional representatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The impact of Neale Creek goes beyond Graham's workplace. The company has met with congressional sources in person, over the phone, over email, and through text messages, and has contributed close to $180,000 to members of Congress and related PACs since 2020. With almost $225,000 in donations made since 2020, Qatari foreign agents employed by Rubin Turnbull & Associates jointly made the largest contributions to political groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Communications from other companies representing Qatar provide some information, even if it may not be quite apparent what Neale Creek and King are saying to Congressmen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, documents disseminated by Qatari foreign agents employed by Venable minimize the Gulf state's ties to terrorist groups while highlighting what Qatar considers to be the benefits of investments made by its sovereign wealth fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Coinbase and Binance have returned to the market. Both businesses had previously withdrawn from the market due to unclear regulations. Since many MPs are gradually coming around to the notion, Coinbase sees India as a critical development location and has just received major regulatory permission.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Moreover, the warming attitude toward crypto in India is partly attributed to ongoing trade negotiations and closer economic ties with the United States. New Delhi policymakers are encouraged to link more near with US regulatory trends to attract foreign investment and foster innovation in the digital asset space. This alignment is encouraging India\u2019s crypto sector to intensify lobbying efforts in the U.S. to gain support for tax reforms and regulatory clarity that could benefit both countries\u2019 crypto markets.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Crypto lobby gains momentum in India as U.S. trade talks influence policy","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"crypto-lobby-gains-momentum-in-india-as-u-s-trade-talks-influence-policy","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 20:51:38","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 20:51:38","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7914","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7856,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-27 18:51:24","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-27 18:51:24","post_content":"\n

At a UN summit next month, France has been pressuring EU nations including the UK, the Netherlands, and Belgium to collectively recognize the state of Palestine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

By having some European countries<\/a> formally recognize Palestinian statehood and several Middle Eastern states formally recognize Israel, French President Emmanuel Macron had planned to utilize the occasion to kickstart peace negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201c\"The war, the displacement [of Palestinians], and the violence of extremist settlers have undermined the two-state solution more than ever before, despite the fact that it is more necessary than ever,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

a French official stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But France has been obliged to lower expectations for the conference it is co-hosting with KSA because to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza brought on by Israel's bombing campaign and its three-month siege, which severely restricts residents' access to food, water, and medicine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"The Arab countries prefer sanctions to statehood,\" <\/p>\n\n\n\n

a EU diplomat stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last week, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer's spokeswoman stated that the UK was prepared to collaborate with regional partners and nations to \"do what we can to support the foundations of Palestinian statehood.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In response to the Palestinians' decades-long demand, Paris and Britain would be the first G7 countries to recognize the state of Palestine. Israel has frequently attacked French diplomatic initiatives, claiming they legitimate Hamas and essentially compensate the terrorist organization for the terror assault in October 2023. Regarding Paris and London's recognition of Palestine, the Israeli administration is probably going to say the same thing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Spain, including Norway and Ireland joined the 140 other UN member nations who recognize the state of Palestine last year. Israel is not recognized by many nations in Middle East and North African countries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

French officials have long warned that Paris will only recognize Palestinian statehood if it improves the peace process, but they have stated for years that Paris is on the verge of doing so. French president declared in April that it was time to take the next stage toward recognition and take part in a collaborative approach that would recognize both Israel and a Palestinian state.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Michel Duclos, a former ambassador to Syria and fellow at the Institut Montaigne, publicly recognizing a Palestinian state would now appear more like a rebuke than a step toward peace as the humanitarian catastrophe in the Gaza Strip worsens. He declared, \"It would be a condemnation of Israel.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

EU recognition of the Palestinian territory, according to Duclos, might \"inspire Arab countries to specify their requirements for normalizing relations with Israel.\" According to the French ambassador cited above, Paris hopes that during the June 17\u201320 summit in New York, Middle Eastern<\/a> governments would continue to take \u201csteps\u201d toward normalisation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The US, Israel's closest friend and biggest military supporter will ultimately determine whether or not the bloodshed in the Gaza Strip and, to a lesser extent, the West Bank is stopped. Furthermore, there is no indication that Washington is yet prepared to recognize a Palestinian state, despite EU officials pointing to a change in Trump's stance toward Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Paris lobbying EU, Britain to recognize Palestinian statehood\u00a0","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"paris-lobbying-eu-britain-to-recognize-palestinian-statehood","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7856","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7849,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content":"\n

The names of the five MEPs connected to the Huawei lobbying controversy were made public by European Parliament President Roberta Metsola on Wednesday. She announced that the EU Parliament<\/a> will vote to terminate Giusi Princi's and\u00a0 Fulvio Martusciello's immunity at the proposal of Belgium management.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Metsola also mentioned three additional EU parliamentarians who had acknowledged earlier this week that Belgian officials had approached them. MEPs Daniel Attard, Nikola Minchev, and Salvatore de Meo were among them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Eight persons have been taken into custody as a result of the inquiry thus far. These include lobbyists and Lawmakers assistants, as well as present and former Huawei workers. Although no MEPs have been taken into custody as of yet, Martusciello's name was anticipated following the arrest of his parliamentary aide in Italy in April.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to investigators, Huawei's lobbyists may have influenced lawmakers with unreported gifts and payments, such as free sports tickets, expensive presents, sizable cash transfers, and even all-expense-paid vacations to China, in return for backing for the Chinese business.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It was disclosed earlier this week that as part of a probe into Huawei's cash-for-influence operation in Brussels, Belgian prosecutors had asked the European Parliament to revoke the immunity of the five MEPs without identifying them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Prior to the revelation, De Meo, Attard, and Minchev\u2014the three MEPs who had gone public\u2014all denied any misconduct. According to De Meo, his issue concerns attending an aperitif, a social event that was not planned by Huawei. Representatives from the Huawei group were also present at the event, which was held outside the European Parliament.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The issue involving Maltese Labour MEP Daniel Attard pertains to a football game he watched in September from Huawei\u2019s box seats at the Anderlecht stadium in Belgium. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I was unaware that the invitation originated from a company or that it pertained to a corporate box. Subsequently, it became evident that the invitation was from an individual under investigation by the Belgian authorities, who aimed to discuss Huawei with me during the match,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Minchev, a Bulgarian Renew MEP, is also being investigated for going<\/a> to Huawei's box during a football game in Anderlecht. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"My presence at this event is now the reason for the management investigation into any potential issues or wrongdoing,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he told the Bulgarian press. Adam Mukhtar, Minchev's assistant, had his office raided by authorities in the middle of March.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The European Commission and European Parliament banned all Huawei lobbyists <\/a>from accessing the organisation\u2019s facilities in reaction to the controversy. Affiliates will be evaluated individually. Huawei stated it had no tolerance for corruption once the incident surfaced, but it hasn't released an official comment since. The Legal Affairs Committee of the EU Parliament will vote on withdrawing the immunity of the five lawmakers after the announcement on Wednesday.<\/p>\n","post_title":"EU integrity under pressure as Huawei-linked MEPs identified","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"eu-integrity-under-pressure-as-huawei-linked-meps-identified","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7849","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7842,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_content":"\n

A Qatari foreign agent contributed about $30,000 to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) campaign committees between 2020 and 2025. In order to support Qatar's interests<\/a>, Graham's office gave his lobbying business a lot of access during that time. This included more than 131 exchanges between the office and the agent, in-person meetings, and phone conversations with the senator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In recent years, this dynamic has been well demonstrated. According to a Washington Examiner analysis of hundreds of public records, Qatar's active foreign agents have given close to $700,000 to Congressmen and other government officials since 2020 while also having open channels of communication and face time with powerful lawmakers, frequently the same individuals they send checks to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to a 2018 scholarly study, when problems that are important to lobbyists are at the center of the political process, they boost their donations to certain committees and MPs. These lobbying payments may be driven by a desire to influence policy, as evidenced by another 2015 study that found that giving to a member of Congress improves access to their office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Andrew King, a Qatari foreign agent who made large donations to Graham's political action organizations, has more than just financial connections to the senator from South Carolina. King spent almost 20 years as a senior worker in Graham's office, where he oversaw the office's Middle Eastern affairs among other things, before starting Neale Creek, his government relations and political consulting business. In addition to his own political donations, King is the treasurer and co-founder of 150 PAC, which has given thousands of dollars to Graham and other members of Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to materials submitted to the Department of Justice, King and Neale Creek engaged in \"the promotion of business with the State of Qatar\" by using the access that congressional offices provided them. Graham's native state of South Carolina has significant investments from Qatar. However, the DOJ's Foreign Agents Registration Act database does not contain the particular papers that were exchanged between Neale Creek and congressional representatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The impact of Neale Creek goes beyond Graham's workplace. The company has met with congressional sources in person, over the phone, over email, and through text messages, and has contributed close to $180,000 to members of Congress and related PACs since 2020. With almost $225,000 in donations made since 2020, Qatari foreign agents employed by Rubin Turnbull & Associates jointly made the largest contributions to political groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Communications from other companies representing Qatar provide some information, even if it may not be quite apparent what Neale Creek and King are saying to Congressmen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, documents disseminated by Qatari foreign agents employed by Venable minimize the Gulf state's ties to terrorist groups while highlighting what Qatar considers to be the benefits of investments made by its sovereign wealth fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Additionally, communication with Indian policymakers has greatly strengthened. They now meet with the industry \"monthly, if not weekly.\" Reexamining the harsh tax system\u2014a 30%<\/a> capital gains tax and a 1% transaction tax\u2014which has caused more than 90% of India's cryptocurrency trade to go abroad remains the primary objective.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Coinbase and Binance have returned to the market. Both businesses had previously withdrawn from the market due to unclear regulations. Since many MPs are gradually coming around to the notion, Coinbase sees India as a critical development location and has just received major regulatory permission.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Moreover, the warming attitude toward crypto in India is partly attributed to ongoing trade negotiations and closer economic ties with the United States. New Delhi policymakers are encouraged to link more near with US regulatory trends to attract foreign investment and foster innovation in the digital asset space. This alignment is encouraging India\u2019s crypto sector to intensify lobbying efforts in the U.S. to gain support for tax reforms and regulatory clarity that could benefit both countries\u2019 crypto markets.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Crypto lobby gains momentum in India as U.S. trade talks influence policy","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"crypto-lobby-gains-momentum-in-india-as-u-s-trade-talks-influence-policy","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 20:51:38","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 20:51:38","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7914","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7856,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-27 18:51:24","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-27 18:51:24","post_content":"\n

At a UN summit next month, France has been pressuring EU nations including the UK, the Netherlands, and Belgium to collectively recognize the state of Palestine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

By having some European countries<\/a> formally recognize Palestinian statehood and several Middle Eastern states formally recognize Israel, French President Emmanuel Macron had planned to utilize the occasion to kickstart peace negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201c\"The war, the displacement [of Palestinians], and the violence of extremist settlers have undermined the two-state solution more than ever before, despite the fact that it is more necessary than ever,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

a French official stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But France has been obliged to lower expectations for the conference it is co-hosting with KSA because to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza brought on by Israel's bombing campaign and its three-month siege, which severely restricts residents' access to food, water, and medicine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"The Arab countries prefer sanctions to statehood,\" <\/p>\n\n\n\n

a EU diplomat stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last week, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer's spokeswoman stated that the UK was prepared to collaborate with regional partners and nations to \"do what we can to support the foundations of Palestinian statehood.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In response to the Palestinians' decades-long demand, Paris and Britain would be the first G7 countries to recognize the state of Palestine. Israel has frequently attacked French diplomatic initiatives, claiming they legitimate Hamas and essentially compensate the terrorist organization for the terror assault in October 2023. Regarding Paris and London's recognition of Palestine, the Israeli administration is probably going to say the same thing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Spain, including Norway and Ireland joined the 140 other UN member nations who recognize the state of Palestine last year. Israel is not recognized by many nations in Middle East and North African countries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

French officials have long warned that Paris will only recognize Palestinian statehood if it improves the peace process, but they have stated for years that Paris is on the verge of doing so. French president declared in April that it was time to take the next stage toward recognition and take part in a collaborative approach that would recognize both Israel and a Palestinian state.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Michel Duclos, a former ambassador to Syria and fellow at the Institut Montaigne, publicly recognizing a Palestinian state would now appear more like a rebuke than a step toward peace as the humanitarian catastrophe in the Gaza Strip worsens. He declared, \"It would be a condemnation of Israel.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

EU recognition of the Palestinian territory, according to Duclos, might \"inspire Arab countries to specify their requirements for normalizing relations with Israel.\" According to the French ambassador cited above, Paris hopes that during the June 17\u201320 summit in New York, Middle Eastern<\/a> governments would continue to take \u201csteps\u201d toward normalisation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The US, Israel's closest friend and biggest military supporter will ultimately determine whether or not the bloodshed in the Gaza Strip and, to a lesser extent, the West Bank is stopped. Furthermore, there is no indication that Washington is yet prepared to recognize a Palestinian state, despite EU officials pointing to a change in Trump's stance toward Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Paris lobbying EU, Britain to recognize Palestinian statehood\u00a0","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"paris-lobbying-eu-britain-to-recognize-palestinian-statehood","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7856","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7849,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content":"\n

The names of the five MEPs connected to the Huawei lobbying controversy were made public by European Parliament President Roberta Metsola on Wednesday. She announced that the EU Parliament<\/a> will vote to terminate Giusi Princi's and\u00a0 Fulvio Martusciello's immunity at the proposal of Belgium management.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Metsola also mentioned three additional EU parliamentarians who had acknowledged earlier this week that Belgian officials had approached them. MEPs Daniel Attard, Nikola Minchev, and Salvatore de Meo were among them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Eight persons have been taken into custody as a result of the inquiry thus far. These include lobbyists and Lawmakers assistants, as well as present and former Huawei workers. Although no MEPs have been taken into custody as of yet, Martusciello's name was anticipated following the arrest of his parliamentary aide in Italy in April.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to investigators, Huawei's lobbyists may have influenced lawmakers with unreported gifts and payments, such as free sports tickets, expensive presents, sizable cash transfers, and even all-expense-paid vacations to China, in return for backing for the Chinese business.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It was disclosed earlier this week that as part of a probe into Huawei's cash-for-influence operation in Brussels, Belgian prosecutors had asked the European Parliament to revoke the immunity of the five MEPs without identifying them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Prior to the revelation, De Meo, Attard, and Minchev\u2014the three MEPs who had gone public\u2014all denied any misconduct. According to De Meo, his issue concerns attending an aperitif, a social event that was not planned by Huawei. Representatives from the Huawei group were also present at the event, which was held outside the European Parliament.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The issue involving Maltese Labour MEP Daniel Attard pertains to a football game he watched in September from Huawei\u2019s box seats at the Anderlecht stadium in Belgium. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I was unaware that the invitation originated from a company or that it pertained to a corporate box. Subsequently, it became evident that the invitation was from an individual under investigation by the Belgian authorities, who aimed to discuss Huawei with me during the match,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Minchev, a Bulgarian Renew MEP, is also being investigated for going<\/a> to Huawei's box during a football game in Anderlecht. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"My presence at this event is now the reason for the management investigation into any potential issues or wrongdoing,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he told the Bulgarian press. Adam Mukhtar, Minchev's assistant, had his office raided by authorities in the middle of March.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The European Commission and European Parliament banned all Huawei lobbyists <\/a>from accessing the organisation\u2019s facilities in reaction to the controversy. Affiliates will be evaluated individually. Huawei stated it had no tolerance for corruption once the incident surfaced, but it hasn't released an official comment since. The Legal Affairs Committee of the EU Parliament will vote on withdrawing the immunity of the five lawmakers after the announcement on Wednesday.<\/p>\n","post_title":"EU integrity under pressure as Huawei-linked MEPs identified","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"eu-integrity-under-pressure-as-huawei-linked-meps-identified","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7849","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7842,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_content":"\n

A Qatari foreign agent contributed about $30,000 to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) campaign committees between 2020 and 2025. In order to support Qatar's interests<\/a>, Graham's office gave his lobbying business a lot of access during that time. This included more than 131 exchanges between the office and the agent, in-person meetings, and phone conversations with the senator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In recent years, this dynamic has been well demonstrated. According to a Washington Examiner analysis of hundreds of public records, Qatar's active foreign agents have given close to $700,000 to Congressmen and other government officials since 2020 while also having open channels of communication and face time with powerful lawmakers, frequently the same individuals they send checks to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to a 2018 scholarly study, when problems that are important to lobbyists are at the center of the political process, they boost their donations to certain committees and MPs. These lobbying payments may be driven by a desire to influence policy, as evidenced by another 2015 study that found that giving to a member of Congress improves access to their office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Andrew King, a Qatari foreign agent who made large donations to Graham's political action organizations, has more than just financial connections to the senator from South Carolina. King spent almost 20 years as a senior worker in Graham's office, where he oversaw the office's Middle Eastern affairs among other things, before starting Neale Creek, his government relations and political consulting business. In addition to his own political donations, King is the treasurer and co-founder of 150 PAC, which has given thousands of dollars to Graham and other members of Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to materials submitted to the Department of Justice, King and Neale Creek engaged in \"the promotion of business with the State of Qatar\" by using the access that congressional offices provided them. Graham's native state of South Carolina has significant investments from Qatar. However, the DOJ's Foreign Agents Registration Act database does not contain the particular papers that were exchanged between Neale Creek and congressional representatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The impact of Neale Creek goes beyond Graham's workplace. The company has met with congressional sources in person, over the phone, over email, and through text messages, and has contributed close to $180,000 to members of Congress and related PACs since 2020. With almost $225,000 in donations made since 2020, Qatari foreign agents employed by Rubin Turnbull & Associates jointly made the largest contributions to political groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Communications from other companies representing Qatar provide some information, even if it may not be quite apparent what Neale Creek and King are saying to Congressmen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, documents disseminated by Qatari foreign agents employed by Venable minimize the Gulf state's ties to terrorist groups while highlighting what Qatar considers to be the benefits of investments made by its sovereign wealth fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Trump's return to the White House and his outspoken support for crypto innovation appear to be in line with the recent change. Industry insiders claim that this abrupt shift in strategy is not an accident.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Additionally, communication with Indian policymakers has greatly strengthened. They now meet with the industry \"monthly, if not weekly.\" Reexamining the harsh tax system\u2014a 30%<\/a> capital gains tax and a 1% transaction tax\u2014which has caused more than 90% of India's cryptocurrency trade to go abroad remains the primary objective.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Coinbase and Binance have returned to the market. Both businesses had previously withdrawn from the market due to unclear regulations. Since many MPs are gradually coming around to the notion, Coinbase sees India as a critical development location and has just received major regulatory permission.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Moreover, the warming attitude toward crypto in India is partly attributed to ongoing trade negotiations and closer economic ties with the United States. New Delhi policymakers are encouraged to link more near with US regulatory trends to attract foreign investment and foster innovation in the digital asset space. This alignment is encouraging India\u2019s crypto sector to intensify lobbying efforts in the U.S. to gain support for tax reforms and regulatory clarity that could benefit both countries\u2019 crypto markets.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Crypto lobby gains momentum in India as U.S. trade talks influence policy","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"crypto-lobby-gains-momentum-in-india-as-u-s-trade-talks-influence-policy","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 20:51:38","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 20:51:38","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7914","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7856,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-27 18:51:24","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-27 18:51:24","post_content":"\n

At a UN summit next month, France has been pressuring EU nations including the UK, the Netherlands, and Belgium to collectively recognize the state of Palestine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

By having some European countries<\/a> formally recognize Palestinian statehood and several Middle Eastern states formally recognize Israel, French President Emmanuel Macron had planned to utilize the occasion to kickstart peace negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201c\"The war, the displacement [of Palestinians], and the violence of extremist settlers have undermined the two-state solution more than ever before, despite the fact that it is more necessary than ever,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

a French official stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But France has been obliged to lower expectations for the conference it is co-hosting with KSA because to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza brought on by Israel's bombing campaign and its three-month siege, which severely restricts residents' access to food, water, and medicine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"The Arab countries prefer sanctions to statehood,\" <\/p>\n\n\n\n

a EU diplomat stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last week, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer's spokeswoman stated that the UK was prepared to collaborate with regional partners and nations to \"do what we can to support the foundations of Palestinian statehood.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In response to the Palestinians' decades-long demand, Paris and Britain would be the first G7 countries to recognize the state of Palestine. Israel has frequently attacked French diplomatic initiatives, claiming they legitimate Hamas and essentially compensate the terrorist organization for the terror assault in October 2023. Regarding Paris and London's recognition of Palestine, the Israeli administration is probably going to say the same thing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Spain, including Norway and Ireland joined the 140 other UN member nations who recognize the state of Palestine last year. Israel is not recognized by many nations in Middle East and North African countries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

French officials have long warned that Paris will only recognize Palestinian statehood if it improves the peace process, but they have stated for years that Paris is on the verge of doing so. French president declared in April that it was time to take the next stage toward recognition and take part in a collaborative approach that would recognize both Israel and a Palestinian state.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Michel Duclos, a former ambassador to Syria and fellow at the Institut Montaigne, publicly recognizing a Palestinian state would now appear more like a rebuke than a step toward peace as the humanitarian catastrophe in the Gaza Strip worsens. He declared, \"It would be a condemnation of Israel.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

EU recognition of the Palestinian territory, according to Duclos, might \"inspire Arab countries to specify their requirements for normalizing relations with Israel.\" According to the French ambassador cited above, Paris hopes that during the June 17\u201320 summit in New York, Middle Eastern<\/a> governments would continue to take \u201csteps\u201d toward normalisation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The US, Israel's closest friend and biggest military supporter will ultimately determine whether or not the bloodshed in the Gaza Strip and, to a lesser extent, the West Bank is stopped. Furthermore, there is no indication that Washington is yet prepared to recognize a Palestinian state, despite EU officials pointing to a change in Trump's stance toward Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Paris lobbying EU, Britain to recognize Palestinian statehood\u00a0","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"paris-lobbying-eu-britain-to-recognize-palestinian-statehood","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7856","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7849,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content":"\n

The names of the five MEPs connected to the Huawei lobbying controversy were made public by European Parliament President Roberta Metsola on Wednesday. She announced that the EU Parliament<\/a> will vote to terminate Giusi Princi's and\u00a0 Fulvio Martusciello's immunity at the proposal of Belgium management.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Metsola also mentioned three additional EU parliamentarians who had acknowledged earlier this week that Belgian officials had approached them. MEPs Daniel Attard, Nikola Minchev, and Salvatore de Meo were among them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Eight persons have been taken into custody as a result of the inquiry thus far. These include lobbyists and Lawmakers assistants, as well as present and former Huawei workers. Although no MEPs have been taken into custody as of yet, Martusciello's name was anticipated following the arrest of his parliamentary aide in Italy in April.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to investigators, Huawei's lobbyists may have influenced lawmakers with unreported gifts and payments, such as free sports tickets, expensive presents, sizable cash transfers, and even all-expense-paid vacations to China, in return for backing for the Chinese business.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It was disclosed earlier this week that as part of a probe into Huawei's cash-for-influence operation in Brussels, Belgian prosecutors had asked the European Parliament to revoke the immunity of the five MEPs without identifying them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Prior to the revelation, De Meo, Attard, and Minchev\u2014the three MEPs who had gone public\u2014all denied any misconduct. According to De Meo, his issue concerns attending an aperitif, a social event that was not planned by Huawei. Representatives from the Huawei group were also present at the event, which was held outside the European Parliament.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The issue involving Maltese Labour MEP Daniel Attard pertains to a football game he watched in September from Huawei\u2019s box seats at the Anderlecht stadium in Belgium. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I was unaware that the invitation originated from a company or that it pertained to a corporate box. Subsequently, it became evident that the invitation was from an individual under investigation by the Belgian authorities, who aimed to discuss Huawei with me during the match,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Minchev, a Bulgarian Renew MEP, is also being investigated for going<\/a> to Huawei's box during a football game in Anderlecht. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"My presence at this event is now the reason for the management investigation into any potential issues or wrongdoing,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he told the Bulgarian press. Adam Mukhtar, Minchev's assistant, had his office raided by authorities in the middle of March.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The European Commission and European Parliament banned all Huawei lobbyists <\/a>from accessing the organisation\u2019s facilities in reaction to the controversy. Affiliates will be evaluated individually. Huawei stated it had no tolerance for corruption once the incident surfaced, but it hasn't released an official comment since. The Legal Affairs Committee of the EU Parliament will vote on withdrawing the immunity of the five lawmakers after the announcement on Wednesday.<\/p>\n","post_title":"EU integrity under pressure as Huawei-linked MEPs identified","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"eu-integrity-under-pressure-as-huawei-linked-meps-identified","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7849","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7842,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_content":"\n

A Qatari foreign agent contributed about $30,000 to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) campaign committees between 2020 and 2025. In order to support Qatar's interests<\/a>, Graham's office gave his lobbying business a lot of access during that time. This included more than 131 exchanges between the office and the agent, in-person meetings, and phone conversations with the senator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In recent years, this dynamic has been well demonstrated. According to a Washington Examiner analysis of hundreds of public records, Qatar's active foreign agents have given close to $700,000 to Congressmen and other government officials since 2020 while also having open channels of communication and face time with powerful lawmakers, frequently the same individuals they send checks to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to a 2018 scholarly study, when problems that are important to lobbyists are at the center of the political process, they boost their donations to certain committees and MPs. These lobbying payments may be driven by a desire to influence policy, as evidenced by another 2015 study that found that giving to a member of Congress improves access to their office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Andrew King, a Qatari foreign agent who made large donations to Graham's political action organizations, has more than just financial connections to the senator from South Carolina. King spent almost 20 years as a senior worker in Graham's office, where he oversaw the office's Middle Eastern affairs among other things, before starting Neale Creek, his government relations and political consulting business. In addition to his own political donations, King is the treasurer and co-founder of 150 PAC, which has given thousands of dollars to Graham and other members of Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to materials submitted to the Department of Justice, King and Neale Creek engaged in \"the promotion of business with the State of Qatar\" by using the access that congressional offices provided them. Graham's native state of South Carolina has significant investments from Qatar. However, the DOJ's Foreign Agents Registration Act database does not contain the particular papers that were exchanged between Neale Creek and congressional representatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The impact of Neale Creek goes beyond Graham's workplace. The company has met with congressional sources in person, over the phone, over email, and through text messages, and has contributed close to $180,000 to members of Congress and related PACs since 2020. With almost $225,000 in donations made since 2020, Qatari foreign agents employed by Rubin Turnbull & Associates jointly made the largest contributions to political groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Communications from other companies representing Qatar provide some information, even if it may not be quite apparent what Neale Creek and King are saying to Congressmen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, documents disseminated by Qatari foreign agents employed by Venable minimize the Gulf state's ties to terrorist groups while highlighting what Qatar considers to be the benefits of investments made by its sovereign wealth fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

The primary demand from India\u2019s crypto industry is a significant reduction in the capital gains tax and the TDS on crypto transactions. Industry representatives argue that the current 30% tax rate is excessively high compared to other investment classes, such as equities, and stifles retail and institutional participation. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump's return to the White House and his outspoken support for crypto innovation appear to be in line with the recent change. Industry insiders claim that this abrupt shift in strategy is not an accident.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Additionally, communication with Indian policymakers has greatly strengthened. They now meet with the industry \"monthly, if not weekly.\" Reexamining the harsh tax system\u2014a 30%<\/a> capital gains tax and a 1% transaction tax\u2014which has caused more than 90% of India's cryptocurrency trade to go abroad remains the primary objective.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Coinbase and Binance have returned to the market. Both businesses had previously withdrawn from the market due to unclear regulations. Since many MPs are gradually coming around to the notion, Coinbase sees India as a critical development location and has just received major regulatory permission.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Moreover, the warming attitude toward crypto in India is partly attributed to ongoing trade negotiations and closer economic ties with the United States. New Delhi policymakers are encouraged to link more near with US regulatory trends to attract foreign investment and foster innovation in the digital asset space. This alignment is encouraging India\u2019s crypto sector to intensify lobbying efforts in the U.S. to gain support for tax reforms and regulatory clarity that could benefit both countries\u2019 crypto markets.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Crypto lobby gains momentum in India as U.S. trade talks influence policy","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"crypto-lobby-gains-momentum-in-india-as-u-s-trade-talks-influence-policy","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 20:51:38","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 20:51:38","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7914","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7856,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-27 18:51:24","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-27 18:51:24","post_content":"\n

At a UN summit next month, France has been pressuring EU nations including the UK, the Netherlands, and Belgium to collectively recognize the state of Palestine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

By having some European countries<\/a> formally recognize Palestinian statehood and several Middle Eastern states formally recognize Israel, French President Emmanuel Macron had planned to utilize the occasion to kickstart peace negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201c\"The war, the displacement [of Palestinians], and the violence of extremist settlers have undermined the two-state solution more than ever before, despite the fact that it is more necessary than ever,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

a French official stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But France has been obliged to lower expectations for the conference it is co-hosting with KSA because to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza brought on by Israel's bombing campaign and its three-month siege, which severely restricts residents' access to food, water, and medicine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"The Arab countries prefer sanctions to statehood,\" <\/p>\n\n\n\n

a EU diplomat stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last week, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer's spokeswoman stated that the UK was prepared to collaborate with regional partners and nations to \"do what we can to support the foundations of Palestinian statehood.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In response to the Palestinians' decades-long demand, Paris and Britain would be the first G7 countries to recognize the state of Palestine. Israel has frequently attacked French diplomatic initiatives, claiming they legitimate Hamas and essentially compensate the terrorist organization for the terror assault in October 2023. Regarding Paris and London's recognition of Palestine, the Israeli administration is probably going to say the same thing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Spain, including Norway and Ireland joined the 140 other UN member nations who recognize the state of Palestine last year. Israel is not recognized by many nations in Middle East and North African countries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

French officials have long warned that Paris will only recognize Palestinian statehood if it improves the peace process, but they have stated for years that Paris is on the verge of doing so. French president declared in April that it was time to take the next stage toward recognition and take part in a collaborative approach that would recognize both Israel and a Palestinian state.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Michel Duclos, a former ambassador to Syria and fellow at the Institut Montaigne, publicly recognizing a Palestinian state would now appear more like a rebuke than a step toward peace as the humanitarian catastrophe in the Gaza Strip worsens. He declared, \"It would be a condemnation of Israel.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

EU recognition of the Palestinian territory, according to Duclos, might \"inspire Arab countries to specify their requirements for normalizing relations with Israel.\" According to the French ambassador cited above, Paris hopes that during the June 17\u201320 summit in New York, Middle Eastern<\/a> governments would continue to take \u201csteps\u201d toward normalisation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The US, Israel's closest friend and biggest military supporter will ultimately determine whether or not the bloodshed in the Gaza Strip and, to a lesser extent, the West Bank is stopped. Furthermore, there is no indication that Washington is yet prepared to recognize a Palestinian state, despite EU officials pointing to a change in Trump's stance toward Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Paris lobbying EU, Britain to recognize Palestinian statehood\u00a0","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"paris-lobbying-eu-britain-to-recognize-palestinian-statehood","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7856","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7849,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content":"\n

The names of the five MEPs connected to the Huawei lobbying controversy were made public by European Parliament President Roberta Metsola on Wednesday. She announced that the EU Parliament<\/a> will vote to terminate Giusi Princi's and\u00a0 Fulvio Martusciello's immunity at the proposal of Belgium management.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Metsola also mentioned three additional EU parliamentarians who had acknowledged earlier this week that Belgian officials had approached them. MEPs Daniel Attard, Nikola Minchev, and Salvatore de Meo were among them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Eight persons have been taken into custody as a result of the inquiry thus far. These include lobbyists and Lawmakers assistants, as well as present and former Huawei workers. Although no MEPs have been taken into custody as of yet, Martusciello's name was anticipated following the arrest of his parliamentary aide in Italy in April.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to investigators, Huawei's lobbyists may have influenced lawmakers with unreported gifts and payments, such as free sports tickets, expensive presents, sizable cash transfers, and even all-expense-paid vacations to China, in return for backing for the Chinese business.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It was disclosed earlier this week that as part of a probe into Huawei's cash-for-influence operation in Brussels, Belgian prosecutors had asked the European Parliament to revoke the immunity of the five MEPs without identifying them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Prior to the revelation, De Meo, Attard, and Minchev\u2014the three MEPs who had gone public\u2014all denied any misconduct. According to De Meo, his issue concerns attending an aperitif, a social event that was not planned by Huawei. Representatives from the Huawei group were also present at the event, which was held outside the European Parliament.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The issue involving Maltese Labour MEP Daniel Attard pertains to a football game he watched in September from Huawei\u2019s box seats at the Anderlecht stadium in Belgium. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I was unaware that the invitation originated from a company or that it pertained to a corporate box. Subsequently, it became evident that the invitation was from an individual under investigation by the Belgian authorities, who aimed to discuss Huawei with me during the match,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Minchev, a Bulgarian Renew MEP, is also being investigated for going<\/a> to Huawei's box during a football game in Anderlecht. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"My presence at this event is now the reason for the management investigation into any potential issues or wrongdoing,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he told the Bulgarian press. Adam Mukhtar, Minchev's assistant, had his office raided by authorities in the middle of March.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The European Commission and European Parliament banned all Huawei lobbyists <\/a>from accessing the organisation\u2019s facilities in reaction to the controversy. Affiliates will be evaluated individually. Huawei stated it had no tolerance for corruption once the incident surfaced, but it hasn't released an official comment since. The Legal Affairs Committee of the EU Parliament will vote on withdrawing the immunity of the five lawmakers after the announcement on Wednesday.<\/p>\n","post_title":"EU integrity under pressure as Huawei-linked MEPs identified","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"eu-integrity-under-pressure-as-huawei-linked-meps-identified","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7849","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7842,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_content":"\n

A Qatari foreign agent contributed about $30,000 to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) campaign committees between 2020 and 2025. In order to support Qatar's interests<\/a>, Graham's office gave his lobbying business a lot of access during that time. This included more than 131 exchanges between the office and the agent, in-person meetings, and phone conversations with the senator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In recent years, this dynamic has been well demonstrated. According to a Washington Examiner analysis of hundreds of public records, Qatar's active foreign agents have given close to $700,000 to Congressmen and other government officials since 2020 while also having open channels of communication and face time with powerful lawmakers, frequently the same individuals they send checks to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to a 2018 scholarly study, when problems that are important to lobbyists are at the center of the political process, they boost their donations to certain committees and MPs. These lobbying payments may be driven by a desire to influence policy, as evidenced by another 2015 study that found that giving to a member of Congress improves access to their office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Andrew King, a Qatari foreign agent who made large donations to Graham's political action organizations, has more than just financial connections to the senator from South Carolina. King spent almost 20 years as a senior worker in Graham's office, where he oversaw the office's Middle Eastern affairs among other things, before starting Neale Creek, his government relations and political consulting business. In addition to his own political donations, King is the treasurer and co-founder of 150 PAC, which has given thousands of dollars to Graham and other members of Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to materials submitted to the Department of Justice, King and Neale Creek engaged in \"the promotion of business with the State of Qatar\" by using the access that congressional offices provided them. Graham's native state of South Carolina has significant investments from Qatar. However, the DOJ's Foreign Agents Registration Act database does not contain the particular papers that were exchanged between Neale Creek and congressional representatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The impact of Neale Creek goes beyond Graham's workplace. The company has met with congressional sources in person, over the phone, over email, and through text messages, and has contributed close to $180,000 to members of Congress and related PACs since 2020. With almost $225,000 in donations made since 2020, Qatari foreign agents employed by Rubin Turnbull & Associates jointly made the largest contributions to political groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Communications from other companies representing Qatar provide some information, even if it may not be quite apparent what Neale Creek and King are saying to Congressmen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, documents disseminated by Qatari foreign agents employed by Venable minimize the Gulf state's ties to terrorist groups while highlighting what Qatar considers to be the benefits of investments made by its sovereign wealth fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

The Reserve Bank of India forbade banks from offering service accounts in 2018. But after a two-year court struggle, the Indian Supreme Court declared the RBI restriction to be unconstitutional, allowing banks to once more provide services to cryptocurrency firms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The primary demand from India\u2019s crypto industry is a significant reduction in the capital gains tax and the TDS on crypto transactions. Industry representatives argue that the current 30% tax rate is excessively high compared to other investment classes, such as equities, and stifles retail and institutional participation. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump's return to the White House and his outspoken support for crypto innovation appear to be in line with the recent change. Industry insiders claim that this abrupt shift in strategy is not an accident.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Additionally, communication with Indian policymakers has greatly strengthened. They now meet with the industry \"monthly, if not weekly.\" Reexamining the harsh tax system\u2014a 30%<\/a> capital gains tax and a 1% transaction tax\u2014which has caused more than 90% of India's cryptocurrency trade to go abroad remains the primary objective.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Coinbase and Binance have returned to the market. Both businesses had previously withdrawn from the market due to unclear regulations. Since many MPs are gradually coming around to the notion, Coinbase sees India as a critical development location and has just received major regulatory permission.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Moreover, the warming attitude toward crypto in India is partly attributed to ongoing trade negotiations and closer economic ties with the United States. New Delhi policymakers are encouraged to link more near with US regulatory trends to attract foreign investment and foster innovation in the digital asset space. This alignment is encouraging India\u2019s crypto sector to intensify lobbying efforts in the U.S. to gain support for tax reforms and regulatory clarity that could benefit both countries\u2019 crypto markets.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Crypto lobby gains momentum in India as U.S. trade talks influence policy","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"crypto-lobby-gains-momentum-in-india-as-u-s-trade-talks-influence-policy","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 20:51:38","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 20:51:38","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7914","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7856,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-27 18:51:24","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-27 18:51:24","post_content":"\n

At a UN summit next month, France has been pressuring EU nations including the UK, the Netherlands, and Belgium to collectively recognize the state of Palestine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

By having some European countries<\/a> formally recognize Palestinian statehood and several Middle Eastern states formally recognize Israel, French President Emmanuel Macron had planned to utilize the occasion to kickstart peace negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201c\"The war, the displacement [of Palestinians], and the violence of extremist settlers have undermined the two-state solution more than ever before, despite the fact that it is more necessary than ever,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

a French official stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But France has been obliged to lower expectations for the conference it is co-hosting with KSA because to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza brought on by Israel's bombing campaign and its three-month siege, which severely restricts residents' access to food, water, and medicine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"The Arab countries prefer sanctions to statehood,\" <\/p>\n\n\n\n

a EU diplomat stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last week, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer's spokeswoman stated that the UK was prepared to collaborate with regional partners and nations to \"do what we can to support the foundations of Palestinian statehood.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In response to the Palestinians' decades-long demand, Paris and Britain would be the first G7 countries to recognize the state of Palestine. Israel has frequently attacked French diplomatic initiatives, claiming they legitimate Hamas and essentially compensate the terrorist organization for the terror assault in October 2023. Regarding Paris and London's recognition of Palestine, the Israeli administration is probably going to say the same thing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Spain, including Norway and Ireland joined the 140 other UN member nations who recognize the state of Palestine last year. Israel is not recognized by many nations in Middle East and North African countries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

French officials have long warned that Paris will only recognize Palestinian statehood if it improves the peace process, but they have stated for years that Paris is on the verge of doing so. French president declared in April that it was time to take the next stage toward recognition and take part in a collaborative approach that would recognize both Israel and a Palestinian state.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Michel Duclos, a former ambassador to Syria and fellow at the Institut Montaigne, publicly recognizing a Palestinian state would now appear more like a rebuke than a step toward peace as the humanitarian catastrophe in the Gaza Strip worsens. He declared, \"It would be a condemnation of Israel.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

EU recognition of the Palestinian territory, according to Duclos, might \"inspire Arab countries to specify their requirements for normalizing relations with Israel.\" According to the French ambassador cited above, Paris hopes that during the June 17\u201320 summit in New York, Middle Eastern<\/a> governments would continue to take \u201csteps\u201d toward normalisation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The US, Israel's closest friend and biggest military supporter will ultimately determine whether or not the bloodshed in the Gaza Strip and, to a lesser extent, the West Bank is stopped. Furthermore, there is no indication that Washington is yet prepared to recognize a Palestinian state, despite EU officials pointing to a change in Trump's stance toward Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Paris lobbying EU, Britain to recognize Palestinian statehood\u00a0","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"paris-lobbying-eu-britain-to-recognize-palestinian-statehood","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7856","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7849,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content":"\n

The names of the five MEPs connected to the Huawei lobbying controversy were made public by European Parliament President Roberta Metsola on Wednesday. She announced that the EU Parliament<\/a> will vote to terminate Giusi Princi's and\u00a0 Fulvio Martusciello's immunity at the proposal of Belgium management.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Metsola also mentioned three additional EU parliamentarians who had acknowledged earlier this week that Belgian officials had approached them. MEPs Daniel Attard, Nikola Minchev, and Salvatore de Meo were among them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Eight persons have been taken into custody as a result of the inquiry thus far. These include lobbyists and Lawmakers assistants, as well as present and former Huawei workers. Although no MEPs have been taken into custody as of yet, Martusciello's name was anticipated following the arrest of his parliamentary aide in Italy in April.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to investigators, Huawei's lobbyists may have influenced lawmakers with unreported gifts and payments, such as free sports tickets, expensive presents, sizable cash transfers, and even all-expense-paid vacations to China, in return for backing for the Chinese business.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It was disclosed earlier this week that as part of a probe into Huawei's cash-for-influence operation in Brussels, Belgian prosecutors had asked the European Parliament to revoke the immunity of the five MEPs without identifying them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Prior to the revelation, De Meo, Attard, and Minchev\u2014the three MEPs who had gone public\u2014all denied any misconduct. According to De Meo, his issue concerns attending an aperitif, a social event that was not planned by Huawei. Representatives from the Huawei group were also present at the event, which was held outside the European Parliament.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The issue involving Maltese Labour MEP Daniel Attard pertains to a football game he watched in September from Huawei\u2019s box seats at the Anderlecht stadium in Belgium. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I was unaware that the invitation originated from a company or that it pertained to a corporate box. Subsequently, it became evident that the invitation was from an individual under investigation by the Belgian authorities, who aimed to discuss Huawei with me during the match,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Minchev, a Bulgarian Renew MEP, is also being investigated for going<\/a> to Huawei's box during a football game in Anderlecht. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"My presence at this event is now the reason for the management investigation into any potential issues or wrongdoing,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he told the Bulgarian press. Adam Mukhtar, Minchev's assistant, had his office raided by authorities in the middle of March.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The European Commission and European Parliament banned all Huawei lobbyists <\/a>from accessing the organisation\u2019s facilities in reaction to the controversy. Affiliates will be evaluated individually. Huawei stated it had no tolerance for corruption once the incident surfaced, but it hasn't released an official comment since. The Legal Affairs Committee of the EU Parliament will vote on withdrawing the immunity of the five lawmakers after the announcement on Wednesday.<\/p>\n","post_title":"EU integrity under pressure as Huawei-linked MEPs identified","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"eu-integrity-under-pressure-as-huawei-linked-meps-identified","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7849","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7842,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_content":"\n

A Qatari foreign agent contributed about $30,000 to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) campaign committees between 2020 and 2025. In order to support Qatar's interests<\/a>, Graham's office gave his lobbying business a lot of access during that time. This included more than 131 exchanges between the office and the agent, in-person meetings, and phone conversations with the senator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In recent years, this dynamic has been well demonstrated. According to a Washington Examiner analysis of hundreds of public records, Qatar's active foreign agents have given close to $700,000 to Congressmen and other government officials since 2020 while also having open channels of communication and face time with powerful lawmakers, frequently the same individuals they send checks to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to a 2018 scholarly study, when problems that are important to lobbyists are at the center of the political process, they boost their donations to certain committees and MPs. These lobbying payments may be driven by a desire to influence policy, as evidenced by another 2015 study that found that giving to a member of Congress improves access to their office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Andrew King, a Qatari foreign agent who made large donations to Graham's political action organizations, has more than just financial connections to the senator from South Carolina. King spent almost 20 years as a senior worker in Graham's office, where he oversaw the office's Middle Eastern affairs among other things, before starting Neale Creek, his government relations and political consulting business. In addition to his own political donations, King is the treasurer and co-founder of 150 PAC, which has given thousands of dollars to Graham and other members of Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to materials submitted to the Department of Justice, King and Neale Creek engaged in \"the promotion of business with the State of Qatar\" by using the access that congressional offices provided them. Graham's native state of South Carolina has significant investments from Qatar. However, the DOJ's Foreign Agents Registration Act database does not contain the particular papers that were exchanged between Neale Creek and congressional representatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The impact of Neale Creek goes beyond Graham's workplace. The company has met with congressional sources in person, over the phone, over email, and through text messages, and has contributed close to $180,000 to members of Congress and related PACs since 2020. With almost $225,000 in donations made since 2020, Qatari foreign agents employed by Rubin Turnbull & Associates jointly made the largest contributions to political groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Communications from other companies representing Qatar provide some information, even if it may not be quite apparent what Neale Creek and King are saying to Congressmen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, documents disseminated by Qatari foreign agents employed by Venable minimize the Gulf state's ties to terrorist groups while highlighting what Qatar considers to be the benefits of investments made by its sovereign wealth fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Since 2022, India has imposed stringent taxes on cryptocurrency transactions, including a 30% capital gains tax and a 1% tax deducted at source (TDS) on every crypto transaction. These measures were introduced to curb the illicit use of digital assets but have significantly dampened domestic trading activity. Industry reports suggest that over 90% of Indian crypto trading has shifted offshore due to these harsh tax burdens, undermining the growth of India\u2019s crypto ecosystem and reducing government oversight and tax revenue potential.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Reserve Bank of India forbade banks from offering service accounts in 2018. But after a two-year court struggle, the Indian Supreme Court declared the RBI restriction to be unconstitutional, allowing banks to once more provide services to cryptocurrency firms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The primary demand from India\u2019s crypto industry is a significant reduction in the capital gains tax and the TDS on crypto transactions. Industry representatives argue that the current 30% tax rate is excessively high compared to other investment classes, such as equities, and stifles retail and institutional participation. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump's return to the White House and his outspoken support for crypto innovation appear to be in line with the recent change. Industry insiders claim that this abrupt shift in strategy is not an accident.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Additionally, communication with Indian policymakers has greatly strengthened. They now meet with the industry \"monthly, if not weekly.\" Reexamining the harsh tax system\u2014a 30%<\/a> capital gains tax and a 1% transaction tax\u2014which has caused more than 90% of India's cryptocurrency trade to go abroad remains the primary objective.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Coinbase and Binance have returned to the market. Both businesses had previously withdrawn from the market due to unclear regulations. Since many MPs are gradually coming around to the notion, Coinbase sees India as a critical development location and has just received major regulatory permission.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Moreover, the warming attitude toward crypto in India is partly attributed to ongoing trade negotiations and closer economic ties with the United States. New Delhi policymakers are encouraged to link more near with US regulatory trends to attract foreign investment and foster innovation in the digital asset space. This alignment is encouraging India\u2019s crypto sector to intensify lobbying efforts in the U.S. to gain support for tax reforms and regulatory clarity that could benefit both countries\u2019 crypto markets.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Crypto lobby gains momentum in India as U.S. trade talks influence policy","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"crypto-lobby-gains-momentum-in-india-as-u-s-trade-talks-influence-policy","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 20:51:38","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 20:51:38","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7914","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7856,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-27 18:51:24","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-27 18:51:24","post_content":"\n

At a UN summit next month, France has been pressuring EU nations including the UK, the Netherlands, and Belgium to collectively recognize the state of Palestine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

By having some European countries<\/a> formally recognize Palestinian statehood and several Middle Eastern states formally recognize Israel, French President Emmanuel Macron had planned to utilize the occasion to kickstart peace negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201c\"The war, the displacement [of Palestinians], and the violence of extremist settlers have undermined the two-state solution more than ever before, despite the fact that it is more necessary than ever,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

a French official stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But France has been obliged to lower expectations for the conference it is co-hosting with KSA because to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza brought on by Israel's bombing campaign and its three-month siege, which severely restricts residents' access to food, water, and medicine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"The Arab countries prefer sanctions to statehood,\" <\/p>\n\n\n\n

a EU diplomat stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last week, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer's spokeswoman stated that the UK was prepared to collaborate with regional partners and nations to \"do what we can to support the foundations of Palestinian statehood.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In response to the Palestinians' decades-long demand, Paris and Britain would be the first G7 countries to recognize the state of Palestine. Israel has frequently attacked French diplomatic initiatives, claiming they legitimate Hamas and essentially compensate the terrorist organization for the terror assault in October 2023. Regarding Paris and London's recognition of Palestine, the Israeli administration is probably going to say the same thing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Spain, including Norway and Ireland joined the 140 other UN member nations who recognize the state of Palestine last year. Israel is not recognized by many nations in Middle East and North African countries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

French officials have long warned that Paris will only recognize Palestinian statehood if it improves the peace process, but they have stated for years that Paris is on the verge of doing so. French president declared in April that it was time to take the next stage toward recognition and take part in a collaborative approach that would recognize both Israel and a Palestinian state.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Michel Duclos, a former ambassador to Syria and fellow at the Institut Montaigne, publicly recognizing a Palestinian state would now appear more like a rebuke than a step toward peace as the humanitarian catastrophe in the Gaza Strip worsens. He declared, \"It would be a condemnation of Israel.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

EU recognition of the Palestinian territory, according to Duclos, might \"inspire Arab countries to specify their requirements for normalizing relations with Israel.\" According to the French ambassador cited above, Paris hopes that during the June 17\u201320 summit in New York, Middle Eastern<\/a> governments would continue to take \u201csteps\u201d toward normalisation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The US, Israel's closest friend and biggest military supporter will ultimately determine whether or not the bloodshed in the Gaza Strip and, to a lesser extent, the West Bank is stopped. Furthermore, there is no indication that Washington is yet prepared to recognize a Palestinian state, despite EU officials pointing to a change in Trump's stance toward Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Paris lobbying EU, Britain to recognize Palestinian statehood\u00a0","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"paris-lobbying-eu-britain-to-recognize-palestinian-statehood","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7856","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7849,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content":"\n

The names of the five MEPs connected to the Huawei lobbying controversy were made public by European Parliament President Roberta Metsola on Wednesday. She announced that the EU Parliament<\/a> will vote to terminate Giusi Princi's and\u00a0 Fulvio Martusciello's immunity at the proposal of Belgium management.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Metsola also mentioned three additional EU parliamentarians who had acknowledged earlier this week that Belgian officials had approached them. MEPs Daniel Attard, Nikola Minchev, and Salvatore de Meo were among them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Eight persons have been taken into custody as a result of the inquiry thus far. These include lobbyists and Lawmakers assistants, as well as present and former Huawei workers. Although no MEPs have been taken into custody as of yet, Martusciello's name was anticipated following the arrest of his parliamentary aide in Italy in April.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to investigators, Huawei's lobbyists may have influenced lawmakers with unreported gifts and payments, such as free sports tickets, expensive presents, sizable cash transfers, and even all-expense-paid vacations to China, in return for backing for the Chinese business.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It was disclosed earlier this week that as part of a probe into Huawei's cash-for-influence operation in Brussels, Belgian prosecutors had asked the European Parliament to revoke the immunity of the five MEPs without identifying them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Prior to the revelation, De Meo, Attard, and Minchev\u2014the three MEPs who had gone public\u2014all denied any misconduct. According to De Meo, his issue concerns attending an aperitif, a social event that was not planned by Huawei. Representatives from the Huawei group were also present at the event, which was held outside the European Parliament.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The issue involving Maltese Labour MEP Daniel Attard pertains to a football game he watched in September from Huawei\u2019s box seats at the Anderlecht stadium in Belgium. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I was unaware that the invitation originated from a company or that it pertained to a corporate box. Subsequently, it became evident that the invitation was from an individual under investigation by the Belgian authorities, who aimed to discuss Huawei with me during the match,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Minchev, a Bulgarian Renew MEP, is also being investigated for going<\/a> to Huawei's box during a football game in Anderlecht. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"My presence at this event is now the reason for the management investigation into any potential issues or wrongdoing,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he told the Bulgarian press. Adam Mukhtar, Minchev's assistant, had his office raided by authorities in the middle of March.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The European Commission and European Parliament banned all Huawei lobbyists <\/a>from accessing the organisation\u2019s facilities in reaction to the controversy. Affiliates will be evaluated individually. Huawei stated it had no tolerance for corruption once the incident surfaced, but it hasn't released an official comment since. The Legal Affairs Committee of the EU Parliament will vote on withdrawing the immunity of the five lawmakers after the announcement on Wednesday.<\/p>\n","post_title":"EU integrity under pressure as Huawei-linked MEPs identified","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"eu-integrity-under-pressure-as-huawei-linked-meps-identified","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7849","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7842,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_content":"\n

A Qatari foreign agent contributed about $30,000 to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) campaign committees between 2020 and 2025. In order to support Qatar's interests<\/a>, Graham's office gave his lobbying business a lot of access during that time. This included more than 131 exchanges between the office and the agent, in-person meetings, and phone conversations with the senator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In recent years, this dynamic has been well demonstrated. According to a Washington Examiner analysis of hundreds of public records, Qatar's active foreign agents have given close to $700,000 to Congressmen and other government officials since 2020 while also having open channels of communication and face time with powerful lawmakers, frequently the same individuals they send checks to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to a 2018 scholarly study, when problems that are important to lobbyists are at the center of the political process, they boost their donations to certain committees and MPs. These lobbying payments may be driven by a desire to influence policy, as evidenced by another 2015 study that found that giving to a member of Congress improves access to their office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Andrew King, a Qatari foreign agent who made large donations to Graham's political action organizations, has more than just financial connections to the senator from South Carolina. King spent almost 20 years as a senior worker in Graham's office, where he oversaw the office's Middle Eastern affairs among other things, before starting Neale Creek, his government relations and political consulting business. In addition to his own political donations, King is the treasurer and co-founder of 150 PAC, which has given thousands of dollars to Graham and other members of Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to materials submitted to the Department of Justice, King and Neale Creek engaged in \"the promotion of business with the State of Qatar\" by using the access that congressional offices provided them. Graham's native state of South Carolina has significant investments from Qatar. However, the DOJ's Foreign Agents Registration Act database does not contain the particular papers that were exchanged between Neale Creek and congressional representatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The impact of Neale Creek goes beyond Graham's workplace. The company has met with congressional sources in person, over the phone, over email, and through text messages, and has contributed close to $180,000 to members of Congress and related PACs since 2020. With almost $225,000 in donations made since 2020, Qatari foreign agents employed by Rubin Turnbull & Associates jointly made the largest contributions to political groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Communications from other companies representing Qatar provide some information, even if it may not be quite apparent what Neale Creek and King are saying to Congressmen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, documents disseminated by Qatari foreign agents employed by Venable minimize the Gulf state's ties to terrorist groups while highlighting what Qatar considers to be the benefits of investments made by its sovereign wealth fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

In contrast to a legislative structure that was more hostile to digital assets, the majority of business stakeholders believe that Prime Minister Narendra Modi's administration is now more receptive to them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Since 2022, India has imposed stringent taxes on cryptocurrency transactions, including a 30% capital gains tax and a 1% tax deducted at source (TDS) on every crypto transaction. These measures were introduced to curb the illicit use of digital assets but have significantly dampened domestic trading activity. Industry reports suggest that over 90% of Indian crypto trading has shifted offshore due to these harsh tax burdens, undermining the growth of India\u2019s crypto ecosystem and reducing government oversight and tax revenue potential.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Reserve Bank of India forbade banks from offering service accounts in 2018. But after a two-year court struggle, the Indian Supreme Court declared the RBI restriction to be unconstitutional, allowing banks to once more provide services to cryptocurrency firms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The primary demand from India\u2019s crypto industry is a significant reduction in the capital gains tax and the TDS on crypto transactions. Industry representatives argue that the current 30% tax rate is excessively high compared to other investment classes, such as equities, and stifles retail and institutional participation. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump's return to the White House and his outspoken support for crypto innovation appear to be in line with the recent change. Industry insiders claim that this abrupt shift in strategy is not an accident.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Additionally, communication with Indian policymakers has greatly strengthened. They now meet with the industry \"monthly, if not weekly.\" Reexamining the harsh tax system\u2014a 30%<\/a> capital gains tax and a 1% transaction tax\u2014which has caused more than 90% of India's cryptocurrency trade to go abroad remains the primary objective.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Coinbase and Binance have returned to the market. Both businesses had previously withdrawn from the market due to unclear regulations. Since many MPs are gradually coming around to the notion, Coinbase sees India as a critical development location and has just received major regulatory permission.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Moreover, the warming attitude toward crypto in India is partly attributed to ongoing trade negotiations and closer economic ties with the United States. New Delhi policymakers are encouraged to link more near with US regulatory trends to attract foreign investment and foster innovation in the digital asset space. This alignment is encouraging India\u2019s crypto sector to intensify lobbying efforts in the U.S. to gain support for tax reforms and regulatory clarity that could benefit both countries\u2019 crypto markets.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Crypto lobby gains momentum in India as U.S. trade talks influence policy","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"crypto-lobby-gains-momentum-in-india-as-u-s-trade-talks-influence-policy","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 20:51:38","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 20:51:38","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7914","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7856,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-27 18:51:24","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-27 18:51:24","post_content":"\n

At a UN summit next month, France has been pressuring EU nations including the UK, the Netherlands, and Belgium to collectively recognize the state of Palestine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

By having some European countries<\/a> formally recognize Palestinian statehood and several Middle Eastern states formally recognize Israel, French President Emmanuel Macron had planned to utilize the occasion to kickstart peace negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201c\"The war, the displacement [of Palestinians], and the violence of extremist settlers have undermined the two-state solution more than ever before, despite the fact that it is more necessary than ever,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

a French official stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But France has been obliged to lower expectations for the conference it is co-hosting with KSA because to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza brought on by Israel's bombing campaign and its three-month siege, which severely restricts residents' access to food, water, and medicine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"The Arab countries prefer sanctions to statehood,\" <\/p>\n\n\n\n

a EU diplomat stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last week, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer's spokeswoman stated that the UK was prepared to collaborate with regional partners and nations to \"do what we can to support the foundations of Palestinian statehood.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In response to the Palestinians' decades-long demand, Paris and Britain would be the first G7 countries to recognize the state of Palestine. Israel has frequently attacked French diplomatic initiatives, claiming they legitimate Hamas and essentially compensate the terrorist organization for the terror assault in October 2023. Regarding Paris and London's recognition of Palestine, the Israeli administration is probably going to say the same thing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Spain, including Norway and Ireland joined the 140 other UN member nations who recognize the state of Palestine last year. Israel is not recognized by many nations in Middle East and North African countries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

French officials have long warned that Paris will only recognize Palestinian statehood if it improves the peace process, but they have stated for years that Paris is on the verge of doing so. French president declared in April that it was time to take the next stage toward recognition and take part in a collaborative approach that would recognize both Israel and a Palestinian state.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Michel Duclos, a former ambassador to Syria and fellow at the Institut Montaigne, publicly recognizing a Palestinian state would now appear more like a rebuke than a step toward peace as the humanitarian catastrophe in the Gaza Strip worsens. He declared, \"It would be a condemnation of Israel.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

EU recognition of the Palestinian territory, according to Duclos, might \"inspire Arab countries to specify their requirements for normalizing relations with Israel.\" According to the French ambassador cited above, Paris hopes that during the June 17\u201320 summit in New York, Middle Eastern<\/a> governments would continue to take \u201csteps\u201d toward normalisation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The US, Israel's closest friend and biggest military supporter will ultimately determine whether or not the bloodshed in the Gaza Strip and, to a lesser extent, the West Bank is stopped. Furthermore, there is no indication that Washington is yet prepared to recognize a Palestinian state, despite EU officials pointing to a change in Trump's stance toward Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Paris lobbying EU, Britain to recognize Palestinian statehood\u00a0","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"paris-lobbying-eu-britain-to-recognize-palestinian-statehood","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7856","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7849,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content":"\n

The names of the five MEPs connected to the Huawei lobbying controversy were made public by European Parliament President Roberta Metsola on Wednesday. She announced that the EU Parliament<\/a> will vote to terminate Giusi Princi's and\u00a0 Fulvio Martusciello's immunity at the proposal of Belgium management.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Metsola also mentioned three additional EU parliamentarians who had acknowledged earlier this week that Belgian officials had approached them. MEPs Daniel Attard, Nikola Minchev, and Salvatore de Meo were among them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Eight persons have been taken into custody as a result of the inquiry thus far. These include lobbyists and Lawmakers assistants, as well as present and former Huawei workers. Although no MEPs have been taken into custody as of yet, Martusciello's name was anticipated following the arrest of his parliamentary aide in Italy in April.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to investigators, Huawei's lobbyists may have influenced lawmakers with unreported gifts and payments, such as free sports tickets, expensive presents, sizable cash transfers, and even all-expense-paid vacations to China, in return for backing for the Chinese business.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It was disclosed earlier this week that as part of a probe into Huawei's cash-for-influence operation in Brussels, Belgian prosecutors had asked the European Parliament to revoke the immunity of the five MEPs without identifying them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Prior to the revelation, De Meo, Attard, and Minchev\u2014the three MEPs who had gone public\u2014all denied any misconduct. According to De Meo, his issue concerns attending an aperitif, a social event that was not planned by Huawei. Representatives from the Huawei group were also present at the event, which was held outside the European Parliament.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The issue involving Maltese Labour MEP Daniel Attard pertains to a football game he watched in September from Huawei\u2019s box seats at the Anderlecht stadium in Belgium. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I was unaware that the invitation originated from a company or that it pertained to a corporate box. Subsequently, it became evident that the invitation was from an individual under investigation by the Belgian authorities, who aimed to discuss Huawei with me during the match,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Minchev, a Bulgarian Renew MEP, is also being investigated for going<\/a> to Huawei's box during a football game in Anderlecht. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"My presence at this event is now the reason for the management investigation into any potential issues or wrongdoing,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he told the Bulgarian press. Adam Mukhtar, Minchev's assistant, had his office raided by authorities in the middle of March.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The European Commission and European Parliament banned all Huawei lobbyists <\/a>from accessing the organisation\u2019s facilities in reaction to the controversy. Affiliates will be evaluated individually. Huawei stated it had no tolerance for corruption once the incident surfaced, but it hasn't released an official comment since. The Legal Affairs Committee of the EU Parliament will vote on withdrawing the immunity of the five lawmakers after the announcement on Wednesday.<\/p>\n","post_title":"EU integrity under pressure as Huawei-linked MEPs identified","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"eu-integrity-under-pressure-as-huawei-linked-meps-identified","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7849","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7842,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_content":"\n

A Qatari foreign agent contributed about $30,000 to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) campaign committees between 2020 and 2025. In order to support Qatar's interests<\/a>, Graham's office gave his lobbying business a lot of access during that time. This included more than 131 exchanges between the office and the agent, in-person meetings, and phone conversations with the senator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In recent years, this dynamic has been well demonstrated. According to a Washington Examiner analysis of hundreds of public records, Qatar's active foreign agents have given close to $700,000 to Congressmen and other government officials since 2020 while also having open channels of communication and face time with powerful lawmakers, frequently the same individuals they send checks to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to a 2018 scholarly study, when problems that are important to lobbyists are at the center of the political process, they boost their donations to certain committees and MPs. These lobbying payments may be driven by a desire to influence policy, as evidenced by another 2015 study that found that giving to a member of Congress improves access to their office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Andrew King, a Qatari foreign agent who made large donations to Graham's political action organizations, has more than just financial connections to the senator from South Carolina. King spent almost 20 years as a senior worker in Graham's office, where he oversaw the office's Middle Eastern affairs among other things, before starting Neale Creek, his government relations and political consulting business. In addition to his own political donations, King is the treasurer and co-founder of 150 PAC, which has given thousands of dollars to Graham and other members of Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to materials submitted to the Department of Justice, King and Neale Creek engaged in \"the promotion of business with the State of Qatar\" by using the access that congressional offices provided them. Graham's native state of South Carolina has significant investments from Qatar. However, the DOJ's Foreign Agents Registration Act database does not contain the particular papers that were exchanged between Neale Creek and congressional representatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The impact of Neale Creek goes beyond Graham's workplace. The company has met with congressional sources in person, over the phone, over email, and through text messages, and has contributed close to $180,000 to members of Congress and related PACs since 2020. With almost $225,000 in donations made since 2020, Qatari foreign agents employed by Rubin Turnbull & Associates jointly made the largest contributions to political groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Communications from other companies representing Qatar provide some information, even if it may not be quite apparent what Neale Creek and King are saying to Congressmen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, documents disseminated by Qatari foreign agents employed by Venable minimize the Gulf state's ties to terrorist groups while highlighting what Qatar considers to be the benefits of investments made by its sovereign wealth fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Due in part to President Donald Trump<\/a>'s crypto-friendly stance and the ongoing trade<\/a> negotiations his administration has been holding with New Delhi, India's cryptocurrency industry is stepping up lobbying efforts to lower the onerous levies that have hindered domestic commerce for years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In contrast to a legislative structure that was more hostile to digital assets, the majority of business stakeholders believe that Prime Minister Narendra Modi's administration is now more receptive to them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Since 2022, India has imposed stringent taxes on cryptocurrency transactions, including a 30% capital gains tax and a 1% tax deducted at source (TDS) on every crypto transaction. These measures were introduced to curb the illicit use of digital assets but have significantly dampened domestic trading activity. Industry reports suggest that over 90% of Indian crypto trading has shifted offshore due to these harsh tax burdens, undermining the growth of India\u2019s crypto ecosystem and reducing government oversight and tax revenue potential.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Reserve Bank of India forbade banks from offering service accounts in 2018. But after a two-year court struggle, the Indian Supreme Court declared the RBI restriction to be unconstitutional, allowing banks to once more provide services to cryptocurrency firms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The primary demand from India\u2019s crypto industry is a significant reduction in the capital gains tax and the TDS on crypto transactions. Industry representatives argue that the current 30% tax rate is excessively high compared to other investment classes, such as equities, and stifles retail and institutional participation. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump's return to the White House and his outspoken support for crypto innovation appear to be in line with the recent change. Industry insiders claim that this abrupt shift in strategy is not an accident.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Additionally, communication with Indian policymakers has greatly strengthened. They now meet with the industry \"monthly, if not weekly.\" Reexamining the harsh tax system\u2014a 30%<\/a> capital gains tax and a 1% transaction tax\u2014which has caused more than 90% of India's cryptocurrency trade to go abroad remains the primary objective.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Coinbase and Binance have returned to the market. Both businesses had previously withdrawn from the market due to unclear regulations. Since many MPs are gradually coming around to the notion, Coinbase sees India as a critical development location and has just received major regulatory permission.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Moreover, the warming attitude toward crypto in India is partly attributed to ongoing trade negotiations and closer economic ties with the United States. New Delhi policymakers are encouraged to link more near with US regulatory trends to attract foreign investment and foster innovation in the digital asset space. This alignment is encouraging India\u2019s crypto sector to intensify lobbying efforts in the U.S. to gain support for tax reforms and regulatory clarity that could benefit both countries\u2019 crypto markets.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Crypto lobby gains momentum in India as U.S. trade talks influence policy","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"crypto-lobby-gains-momentum-in-india-as-u-s-trade-talks-influence-policy","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-31 20:51:38","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-31 20:51:38","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7914","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7856,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-27 18:51:24","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-27 18:51:24","post_content":"\n

At a UN summit next month, France has been pressuring EU nations including the UK, the Netherlands, and Belgium to collectively recognize the state of Palestine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

By having some European countries<\/a> formally recognize Palestinian statehood and several Middle Eastern states formally recognize Israel, French President Emmanuel Macron had planned to utilize the occasion to kickstart peace negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201c\"The war, the displacement [of Palestinians], and the violence of extremist settlers have undermined the two-state solution more than ever before, despite the fact that it is more necessary than ever,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

a French official stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But France has been obliged to lower expectations for the conference it is co-hosting with KSA because to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza brought on by Israel's bombing campaign and its three-month siege, which severely restricts residents' access to food, water, and medicine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"The Arab countries prefer sanctions to statehood,\" <\/p>\n\n\n\n

a EU diplomat stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last week, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer's spokeswoman stated that the UK was prepared to collaborate with regional partners and nations to \"do what we can to support the foundations of Palestinian statehood.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In response to the Palestinians' decades-long demand, Paris and Britain would be the first G7 countries to recognize the state of Palestine. Israel has frequently attacked French diplomatic initiatives, claiming they legitimate Hamas and essentially compensate the terrorist organization for the terror assault in October 2023. Regarding Paris and London's recognition of Palestine, the Israeli administration is probably going to say the same thing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Spain, including Norway and Ireland joined the 140 other UN member nations who recognize the state of Palestine last year. Israel is not recognized by many nations in Middle East and North African countries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

French officials have long warned that Paris will only recognize Palestinian statehood if it improves the peace process, but they have stated for years that Paris is on the verge of doing so. French president declared in April that it was time to take the next stage toward recognition and take part in a collaborative approach that would recognize both Israel and a Palestinian state.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Michel Duclos, a former ambassador to Syria and fellow at the Institut Montaigne, publicly recognizing a Palestinian state would now appear more like a rebuke than a step toward peace as the humanitarian catastrophe in the Gaza Strip worsens. He declared, \"It would be a condemnation of Israel.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

EU recognition of the Palestinian territory, according to Duclos, might \"inspire Arab countries to specify their requirements for normalizing relations with Israel.\" According to the French ambassador cited above, Paris hopes that during the June 17\u201320 summit in New York, Middle Eastern<\/a> governments would continue to take \u201csteps\u201d toward normalisation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The US, Israel's closest friend and biggest military supporter will ultimately determine whether or not the bloodshed in the Gaza Strip and, to a lesser extent, the West Bank is stopped. Furthermore, there is no indication that Washington is yet prepared to recognize a Palestinian state, despite EU officials pointing to a change in Trump's stance toward Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Paris lobbying EU, Britain to recognize Palestinian statehood\u00a0","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"paris-lobbying-eu-britain-to-recognize-palestinian-statehood","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-28 18:57:18","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7856","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7849,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content":"\n

The names of the five MEPs connected to the Huawei lobbying controversy were made public by European Parliament President Roberta Metsola on Wednesday. She announced that the EU Parliament<\/a> will vote to terminate Giusi Princi's and\u00a0 Fulvio Martusciello's immunity at the proposal of Belgium management.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Metsola also mentioned three additional EU parliamentarians who had acknowledged earlier this week that Belgian officials had approached them. MEPs Daniel Attard, Nikola Minchev, and Salvatore de Meo were among them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Eight persons have been taken into custody as a result of the inquiry thus far. These include lobbyists and Lawmakers assistants, as well as present and former Huawei workers. Although no MEPs have been taken into custody as of yet, Martusciello's name was anticipated following the arrest of his parliamentary aide in Italy in April.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to investigators, Huawei's lobbyists may have influenced lawmakers with unreported gifts and payments, such as free sports tickets, expensive presents, sizable cash transfers, and even all-expense-paid vacations to China, in return for backing for the Chinese business.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It was disclosed earlier this week that as part of a probe into Huawei's cash-for-influence operation in Brussels, Belgian prosecutors had asked the European Parliament to revoke the immunity of the five MEPs without identifying them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Prior to the revelation, De Meo, Attard, and Minchev\u2014the three MEPs who had gone public\u2014all denied any misconduct. According to De Meo, his issue concerns attending an aperitif, a social event that was not planned by Huawei. Representatives from the Huawei group were also present at the event, which was held outside the European Parliament.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The issue involving Maltese Labour MEP Daniel Attard pertains to a football game he watched in September from Huawei\u2019s box seats at the Anderlecht stadium in Belgium. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I was unaware that the invitation originated from a company or that it pertained to a corporate box. Subsequently, it became evident that the invitation was from an individual under investigation by the Belgian authorities, who aimed to discuss Huawei with me during the match,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Minchev, a Bulgarian Renew MEP, is also being investigated for going<\/a> to Huawei's box during a football game in Anderlecht. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"My presence at this event is now the reason for the management investigation into any potential issues or wrongdoing,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he told the Bulgarian press. Adam Mukhtar, Minchev's assistant, had his office raided by authorities in the middle of March.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The European Commission and European Parliament banned all Huawei lobbyists <\/a>from accessing the organisation\u2019s facilities in reaction to the controversy. Affiliates will be evaluated individually. Huawei stated it had no tolerance for corruption once the incident surfaced, but it hasn't released an official comment since. The Legal Affairs Committee of the EU Parliament will vote on withdrawing the immunity of the five lawmakers after the announcement on Wednesday.<\/p>\n","post_title":"EU integrity under pressure as Huawei-linked MEPs identified","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"eu-integrity-under-pressure-as-huawei-linked-meps-identified","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-27 16:02:36","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7849","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7842,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-25 14:50:08","post_content":"\n

A Qatari foreign agent contributed about $30,000 to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) campaign committees between 2020 and 2025. In order to support Qatar's interests<\/a>, Graham's office gave his lobbying business a lot of access during that time. This included more than 131 exchanges between the office and the agent, in-person meetings, and phone conversations with the senator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In recent years, this dynamic has been well demonstrated. According to a Washington Examiner analysis of hundreds of public records, Qatar's active foreign agents have given close to $700,000 to Congressmen and other government officials since 2020 while also having open channels of communication and face time with powerful lawmakers, frequently the same individuals they send checks to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to a 2018 scholarly study, when problems that are important to lobbyists are at the center of the political process, they boost their donations to certain committees and MPs. These lobbying payments may be driven by a desire to influence policy, as evidenced by another 2015 study that found that giving to a member of Congress improves access to their office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Andrew King, a Qatari foreign agent who made large donations to Graham's political action organizations, has more than just financial connections to the senator from South Carolina. King spent almost 20 years as a senior worker in Graham's office, where he oversaw the office's Middle Eastern affairs among other things, before starting Neale Creek, his government relations and political consulting business. In addition to his own political donations, King is the treasurer and co-founder of 150 PAC, which has given thousands of dollars to Graham and other members of Congress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to materials submitted to the Department of Justice, King and Neale Creek engaged in \"the promotion of business with the State of Qatar\" by using the access that congressional offices provided them. Graham's native state of South Carolina has significant investments from Qatar. However, the DOJ's Foreign Agents Registration Act database does not contain the particular papers that were exchanged between Neale Creek and congressional representatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The impact of Neale Creek goes beyond Graham's workplace. The company has met with congressional sources in person, over the phone, over email, and through text messages, and has contributed close to $180,000 to members of Congress and related PACs since 2020. With almost $225,000 in donations made since 2020, Qatari foreign agents employed by Rubin Turnbull & Associates jointly made the largest contributions to political groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Communications from other companies representing Qatar provide some information, even if it may not be quite apparent what Neale Creek and King are saying to Congressmen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, documents disseminated by Qatari foreign agents employed by Venable minimize the Gulf state's ties to terrorist groups while highlighting what Qatar considers to be the benefits of investments made by its sovereign wealth fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, one of these documents presented to policymakers notes that Qatar is \u201ca founding member of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS,\u201d but it fails to mention that the founder of Al Qaeda, the forerunner of ISIS, found refuge in Iraq thanks to a member of Qatar\u2019s royal family. Additionally, the Qatari monarch offered Qatari passports and $1 million in assistance to Iraqi Al Qaeda militants. Another important source of funding for Hamas has been Qatar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar to Neale Creek, Venable likewise contributes a sizable sum to the congressional representatives whose offices they subsequently influence. Campaign finance documents reveal that since 2020, the firm's PAC has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to entities associated with congressional leadership from both parties.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Donations from Qatari lobbyists raise ethical concerns on Capitol Hill","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"donations-from-qatari-lobbyists-raise-ethical-concerns-on-capitol-hill","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-26 14:55:12","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7842","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7834,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_date_gmt":"2025-05-24 13:40:18","post_content":"\n

Cryptocurrency companies had to make two attempts to persuade the Senate to approve a scheme they had long been pursuing to regulate stablecoins, which are digital assets that are based on currencies like the dollar. It has come to light that now, the entire plan might be derailed by a contentious policy dispute over credit cards. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) have long been at odds over legislation that would increase competition and target credit card swipe fees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Banks, credit unions, Visa, and Mastercard claim the law would compel businesses to reduce customer benefits, while retailers claim it would lower prices for consumers. Additionally, the proposal's detractors are putting up a fierce battle against a recent attempt to include it in the Senate's stablecoin bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"It's a terrible policy.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

He went on to say, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"I'd go from being a co-sponsor to trying to figure out how to tank the [stablecoin] bill if the swipe fee measure got attached.\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

My coworkers won't be surprised by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the conflicting interests and their large financial stakes have kept the Republican Party so split that the swipe charge measure was never put to a roll-call vote. Vice President JD Vance signed the law when serving as a senator, but he later privately informed lobbyists that he would not attempt to promote it. This is just one example of the complicated dynamics at work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Tuesday, Marshall submitted his proposal as an amendmen<\/a>t to the stablecoin bill in the Senate. However, it's unclear if he would advocate for a floor vote. Durbin said that since the swipe charge concept had never before seen floor action, he was unsure if it would receive 60 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"We still haven't made a decision. Marshall said to Semafor on Wednesday, \"We're still measuring twice before we cut once.\" He claimed he hadn't determined how to handle the amendment and didn't want to talk about it any more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cryptocurrency sector is currently subtly urging its supporters on Capitol Hill<\/a> to prevent the amendment from being put to a vote. Some in the business argue that more Democrats may support the swipe charge measure if it were approved by a simple majority vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion of the credit card amendment \"puts me on the spot, doesn't it?\" asked Durbin, who is against the larger stablecoin plan. However, with 69 senators voting to advance it on Wednesday and 60 senators needing to vote to pass it, the crypto measure doesn't have much space to lose support. Because of this, the majority of the sector is cautious of frightening off Republican politicians like Tillis. Supporters are optimistic that French Hill, R-Ark., the Financial Services Chair, would pass the bill unaltered in the House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill has been a strong opponent of Marshall and Durbin's bill and doesn't appear to be going anywhere: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"This is not one where I would be inclined to change my long-stated view,\" <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

he said in a February interview with Punchbowl News. One of the proponents of the stablecoin bill, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., told Semafor on Wednesday, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\"We're trying to keep this as clean and expedient as possible.\"<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","post_title":"Intense lobbying erupts over potential pairing of credit card and cryptocurrency legislation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"intense-lobbying-erupts-over-potential-pairing-of-credit-card-and-cryptocurrency-legislation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_modified_gmt":"2025-05-25 13:46:10","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7834","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":38},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

Page 38 of 70 1 37 38 39 70