Menu
Additionally, the creation of a new Parliamentary Select Committee to examine the impact of social media on Australian society is significant. This committee will investigate how algorithms and corporate decisions influence what we see online. This step promotes greater transparency and accountability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
It's also encouraging to see the federal government<\/a> moving forward with an age verification trial to prevent children from accessing content that is not good for them. The main aim of all of these measures is to make a safe online environment for children.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n Additionally, the creation of a new Parliamentary Select Committee to examine the impact of social media on Australian society is significant. This committee will investigate how algorithms and corporate decisions influence what we see online. This step promotes greater transparency and accountability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n So there is a legal battle between Elon Musk<\/a>\u2019s platform, X, and the Federal safety Commissioner. The main purpose of the battle is to block all violent videos that are harmful for children who are under 18. These Act are compulsory to provide an effective online environment and also to protect the online presence of children.\u00a0<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying against online safety bill: Tech companies spent $1.5m for this purpose","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-against-online-safety-bill-tech-companies-spent-1-5m-for-this-purpose","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7028","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":59},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
\n The current push by tech giants to influence legislation is crucial, especially given similar efforts in Australia. The South Australian government is also concerned about their children's safety. They plan to ban the social media platform for children under 14. For those children that are under 15 and 16 need their parents permission in order to use the social media apps. It is a commendable step to secure the privacy of youngsters. <\/p>\n\n\n\n It's also encouraging to see the federal government<\/a> moving forward with an age verification trial to prevent children from accessing content that is not good for them. The main aim of all of these measures is to make a safe online environment for children.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n Additionally, the creation of a new Parliamentary Select Committee to examine the impact of social media on Australian society is significant. This committee will investigate how algorithms and corporate decisions influence what we see online. This step promotes greater transparency and accountability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n So there is a legal battle between Elon Musk<\/a>\u2019s platform, X, and the Federal safety Commissioner. The main purpose of the battle is to block all violent videos that are harmful for children who are under 18. These Act are compulsory to provide an effective online environment and also to protect the online presence of children.\u00a0<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying against online safety bill: Tech companies spent $1.5m for this purpose","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-against-online-safety-bill-tech-companies-spent-1-5m-for-this-purpose","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7028","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":59},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
\n As Meta continues to collaborate with New York lawmakers, it's important to avoid quick fixes and instead focus on creating laws that genuinely empower parents and support teens online.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The current push by tech giants to influence legislation is crucial, especially given similar efforts in Australia. The South Australian government is also concerned about their children's safety. They plan to ban the social media platform for children under 14. For those children that are under 15 and 16 need their parents permission in order to use the social media apps. It is a commendable step to secure the privacy of youngsters. <\/p>\n\n\n\n It's also encouraging to see the federal government<\/a> moving forward with an age verification trial to prevent children from accessing content that is not good for them. The main aim of all of these measures is to make a safe online environment for children.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n Additionally, the creation of a new Parliamentary Select Committee to examine the impact of social media on Australian society is significant. This committee will investigate how algorithms and corporate decisions influence what we see online. This step promotes greater transparency and accountability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n So there is a legal battle between Elon Musk<\/a>\u2019s platform, X, and the Federal safety Commissioner. The main purpose of the battle is to block all violent videos that are harmful for children who are under 18. These Act are compulsory to provide an effective online environment and also to protect the online presence of children.\u00a0<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying against online safety bill: Tech companies spent $1.5m for this purpose","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-against-online-safety-bill-tech-companies-spent-1-5m-for-this-purpose","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7028","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":59},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
\n A spokesperson from Meta side mentioned that parental consent should be for children who are under 16 to download apps but against state-specific laws. According to them different state laws would lead to inconsistent online experiences for teens and their parents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As Meta continues to collaborate with New York lawmakers, it's important to avoid quick fixes and instead focus on creating laws that genuinely empower parents and support teens online.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The current push by tech giants to influence legislation is crucial, especially given similar efforts in Australia. The South Australian government is also concerned about their children's safety. They plan to ban the social media platform for children under 14. For those children that are under 15 and 16 need their parents permission in order to use the social media apps. It is a commendable step to secure the privacy of youngsters. <\/p>\n\n\n\n It's also encouraging to see the federal government<\/a> moving forward with an age verification trial to prevent children from accessing content that is not good for them. The main aim of all of these measures is to make a safe online environment for children.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n Additionally, the creation of a new Parliamentary Select Committee to examine the impact of social media on Australian society is significant. This committee will investigate how algorithms and corporate decisions influence what we see online. This step promotes greater transparency and accountability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n So there is a legal battle between Elon Musk<\/a>\u2019s platform, X, and the Federal safety Commissioner. The main purpose of the battle is to block all violent videos that are harmful for children who are under 18. These Act are compulsory to provide an effective online environment and also to protect the online presence of children.\u00a0<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying against online safety bill: Tech companies spent $1.5m for this purpose","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-against-online-safety-bill-tech-companies-spent-1-5m-for-this-purpose","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7028","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":59},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
\n Tech companies oppose the law and argue that these Act could limit freedom of speech<\/a>. Furthermore, it can also\u00a0 reduce online privacy for teenagers, restrict internet access for migrants, and hinder algorithms designed to combat hate speech. However, these concerns seem exaggerated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A spokesperson from Meta side mentioned that parental consent should be for children who are under 16 to download apps but against state-specific laws. According to them different state laws would lead to inconsistent online experiences for teens and their parents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As Meta continues to collaborate with New York lawmakers, it's important to avoid quick fixes and instead focus on creating laws that genuinely empower parents and support teens online.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The current push by tech giants to influence legislation is crucial, especially given similar efforts in Australia. The South Australian government is also concerned about their children's safety. They plan to ban the social media platform for children under 14. For those children that are under 15 and 16 need their parents permission in order to use the social media apps. It is a commendable step to secure the privacy of youngsters. <\/p>\n\n\n\n It's also encouraging to see the federal government<\/a> moving forward with an age verification trial to prevent children from accessing content that is not good for them. The main aim of all of these measures is to make a safe online environment for children.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n Additionally, the creation of a new Parliamentary Select Committee to examine the impact of social media on Australian society is significant. This committee will investigate how algorithms and corporate decisions influence what we see online. This step promotes greater transparency and accountability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n So there is a legal battle between Elon Musk<\/a>\u2019s platform, X, and the Federal safety Commissioner. The main purpose of the battle is to block all violent videos that are harmful for children who are under 18. These Act are compulsory to provide an effective online environment and also to protect the online presence of children.\u00a0<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying against online safety bill: Tech companies spent $1.5m for this purpose","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-against-online-safety-bill-tech-companies-spent-1-5m-for-this-purpose","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7028","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":59},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
\n The second Act is also important. This Act works to prevent the collection and selling data<\/a> of users under 18 without consent. The parent consent would be important especially for those children under 13. This law would help safeguard kids' privacy and keep their data secure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Tech companies oppose the law and argue that these Act could limit freedom of speech<\/a>. Furthermore, it can also\u00a0 reduce online privacy for teenagers, restrict internet access for migrants, and hinder algorithms designed to combat hate speech. However, these concerns seem exaggerated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A spokesperson from Meta side mentioned that parental consent should be for children who are under 16 to download apps but against state-specific laws. According to them different state laws would lead to inconsistent online experiences for teens and their parents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As Meta continues to collaborate with New York lawmakers, it's important to avoid quick fixes and instead focus on creating laws that genuinely empower parents and support teens online.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The current push by tech giants to influence legislation is crucial, especially given similar efforts in Australia. The South Australian government is also concerned about their children's safety. They plan to ban the social media platform for children under 14. For those children that are under 15 and 16 need their parents permission in order to use the social media apps. It is a commendable step to secure the privacy of youngsters. <\/p>\n\n\n\n It's also encouraging to see the federal government<\/a> moving forward with an age verification trial to prevent children from accessing content that is not good for them. The main aim of all of these measures is to make a safe online environment for children.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n Additionally, the creation of a new Parliamentary Select Committee to examine the impact of social media on Australian society is significant. This committee will investigate how algorithms and corporate decisions influence what we see online. This step promotes greater transparency and accountability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n So there is a legal battle between Elon Musk<\/a>\u2019s platform, X, and the Federal safety Commissioner. The main purpose of the battle is to block all violent videos that are harmful for children who are under 18. These Act are compulsory to provide an effective online environment and also to protect the online presence of children.\u00a0<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying against online safety bill: Tech companies spent $1.5m for this purpose","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-against-online-safety-bill-tech-companies-spent-1-5m-for-this-purpose","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7028","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":59},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
\n Additionally, the bill empowers parents to set time limits on their kids' social media use and manage in-app notifications, helping to reduce screen time and distractions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The second Act is also important. This Act works to prevent the collection and selling data<\/a> of users under 18 without consent. The parent consent would be important especially for those children under 13. This law would help safeguard kids' privacy and keep their data secure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Tech companies oppose the law and argue that these Act could limit freedom of speech<\/a>. Furthermore, it can also\u00a0 reduce online privacy for teenagers, restrict internet access for migrants, and hinder algorithms designed to combat hate speech. However, these concerns seem exaggerated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A spokesperson from Meta side mentioned that parental consent should be for children who are under 16 to download apps but against state-specific laws. According to them different state laws would lead to inconsistent online experiences for teens and their parents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As Meta continues to collaborate with New York lawmakers, it's important to avoid quick fixes and instead focus on creating laws that genuinely empower parents and support teens online.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The current push by tech giants to influence legislation is crucial, especially given similar efforts in Australia. The South Australian government is also concerned about their children's safety. They plan to ban the social media platform for children under 14. For those children that are under 15 and 16 need their parents permission in order to use the social media apps. It is a commendable step to secure the privacy of youngsters. <\/p>\n\n\n\n It's also encouraging to see the federal government<\/a> moving forward with an age verification trial to prevent children from accessing content that is not good for them. The main aim of all of these measures is to make a safe online environment for children.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n Additionally, the creation of a new Parliamentary Select Committee to examine the impact of social media on Australian society is significant. This committee will investigate how algorithms and corporate decisions influence what we see online. This step promotes greater transparency and accountability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n So there is a legal battle between Elon Musk<\/a>\u2019s platform, X, and the Federal safety Commissioner. The main purpose of the battle is to block all violent videos that are harmful for children who are under 18. These Act are compulsory to provide an effective online environment and also to protect the online presence of children.\u00a0<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying against online safety bill: Tech companies spent $1.5m for this purpose","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-against-online-safety-bill-tech-companies-spent-1-5m-for-this-purpose","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7028","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":59},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
\n One of the crucial step that protect the children online presence is the SAFE Act. According to this Act children see only those posts in social media platforms that their parents allow. This gives parents more control over what their children are exposed to on these platforms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Additionally, the bill empowers parents to set time limits on their kids' social media use and manage in-app notifications, helping to reduce screen time and distractions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The second Act is also important. This Act works to prevent the collection and selling data<\/a> of users under 18 without consent. The parent consent would be important especially for those children under 13. This law would help safeguard kids' privacy and keep their data secure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Tech companies oppose the law and argue that these Act could limit freedom of speech<\/a>. Furthermore, it can also\u00a0 reduce online privacy for teenagers, restrict internet access for migrants, and hinder algorithms designed to combat hate speech. However, these concerns seem exaggerated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A spokesperson from Meta side mentioned that parental consent should be for children who are under 16 to download apps but against state-specific laws. According to them different state laws would lead to inconsistent online experiences for teens and their parents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As Meta continues to collaborate with New York lawmakers, it's important to avoid quick fixes and instead focus on creating laws that genuinely empower parents and support teens online.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The current push by tech giants to influence legislation is crucial, especially given similar efforts in Australia. The South Australian government is also concerned about their children's safety. They plan to ban the social media platform for children under 14. For those children that are under 15 and 16 need their parents permission in order to use the social media apps. It is a commendable step to secure the privacy of youngsters. <\/p>\n\n\n\n It's also encouraging to see the federal government<\/a> moving forward with an age verification trial to prevent children from accessing content that is not good for them. The main aim of all of these measures is to make a safe online environment for children.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n Additionally, the creation of a new Parliamentary Select Committee to examine the impact of social media on Australian society is significant. This committee will investigate how algorithms and corporate decisions influence what we see online. This step promotes greater transparency and accountability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n So there is a legal battle between Elon Musk<\/a>\u2019s platform, X, and the Federal safety Commissioner. The main purpose of the battle is to block all violent videos that are harmful for children who are under 18. These Act are compulsory to provide an effective online environment and also to protect the online presence of children.\u00a0<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying against online safety bill: Tech companies spent $1.5m for this purpose","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-against-online-safety-bill-tech-companies-spent-1-5m-for-this-purpose","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7028","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":59},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
\n According to the New York Post \u201cThis is an astonishing amount of money to be spent to kill two reasonable bills.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n One of the crucial step that protect the children online presence is the SAFE Act. According to this Act children see only those posts in social media platforms that their parents allow. This gives parents more control over what their children are exposed to on these platforms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Additionally, the bill empowers parents to set time limits on their kids' social media use and manage in-app notifications, helping to reduce screen time and distractions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The second Act is also important. This Act works to prevent the collection and selling data<\/a> of users under 18 without consent. The parent consent would be important especially for those children under 13. This law would help safeguard kids' privacy and keep their data secure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Tech companies oppose the law and argue that these Act could limit freedom of speech<\/a>. Furthermore, it can also\u00a0 reduce online privacy for teenagers, restrict internet access for migrants, and hinder algorithms designed to combat hate speech. However, these concerns seem exaggerated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A spokesperson from Meta side mentioned that parental consent should be for children who are under 16 to download apps but against state-specific laws. According to them different state laws would lead to inconsistent online experiences for teens and their parents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As Meta continues to collaborate with New York lawmakers, it's important to avoid quick fixes and instead focus on creating laws that genuinely empower parents and support teens online.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The current push by tech giants to influence legislation is crucial, especially given similar efforts in Australia. The South Australian government is also concerned about their children's safety. They plan to ban the social media platform for children under 14. For those children that are under 15 and 16 need their parents permission in order to use the social media apps. It is a commendable step to secure the privacy of youngsters. <\/p>\n\n\n\n It's also encouraging to see the federal government<\/a> moving forward with an age verification trial to prevent children from accessing content that is not good for them. The main aim of all of these measures is to make a safe online environment for children.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n Additionally, the creation of a new Parliamentary Select Committee to examine the impact of social media on Australian society is significant. This committee will investigate how algorithms and corporate decisions influence what we see online. This step promotes greater transparency and accountability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n So there is a legal battle between Elon Musk<\/a>\u2019s platform, X, and the Federal safety Commissioner. The main purpose of the battle is to block all violent videos that are harmful for children who are under 18. These Act are compulsory to provide an effective online environment and also to protect the online presence of children.\u00a0<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying against online safety bill: Tech companies spent $1.5m for this purpose","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-against-online-safety-bill-tech-companies-spent-1-5m-for-this-purpose","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7028","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":59},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
\n This is the clear indicator of how determined they are to keep their interests protected, even if it means opposing laws designed to safeguard children.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to the New York Post \u201cThis is an astonishing amount of money to be spent to kill two reasonable bills.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n One of the crucial step that protect the children online presence is the SAFE Act. According to this Act children see only those posts in social media platforms that their parents allow. This gives parents more control over what their children are exposed to on these platforms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Additionally, the bill empowers parents to set time limits on their kids' social media use and manage in-app notifications, helping to reduce screen time and distractions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The second Act is also important. This Act works to prevent the collection and selling data<\/a> of users under 18 without consent. The parent consent would be important especially for those children under 13. This law would help safeguard kids' privacy and keep their data secure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Tech companies oppose the law and argue that these Act could limit freedom of speech<\/a>. Furthermore, it can also\u00a0 reduce online privacy for teenagers, restrict internet access for migrants, and hinder algorithms designed to combat hate speech. However, these concerns seem exaggerated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A spokesperson from Meta side mentioned that parental consent should be for children who are under 16 to download apps but against state-specific laws. According to them different state laws would lead to inconsistent online experiences for teens and their parents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As Meta continues to collaborate with New York lawmakers, it's important to avoid quick fixes and instead focus on creating laws that genuinely empower parents and support teens online.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The current push by tech giants to influence legislation is crucial, especially given similar efforts in Australia. The South Australian government is also concerned about their children's safety. They plan to ban the social media platform for children under 14. For those children that are under 15 and 16 need their parents permission in order to use the social media apps. It is a commendable step to secure the privacy of youngsters. <\/p>\n\n\n\n It's also encouraging to see the federal government<\/a> moving forward with an age verification trial to prevent children from accessing content that is not good for them. The main aim of all of these measures is to make a safe online environment for children.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n Additionally, the creation of a new Parliamentary Select Committee to examine the impact of social media on Australian society is significant. This committee will investigate how algorithms and corporate decisions influence what we see online. This step promotes greater transparency and accountability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n So there is a legal battle between Elon Musk<\/a>\u2019s platform, X, and the Federal safety Commissioner. The main purpose of the battle is to block all violent videos that are harmful for children who are under 18. These Act are compulsory to provide an effective online environment and also to protect the online presence of children.\u00a0<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying against online safety bill: Tech companies spent $1.5m for this purpose","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-against-online-safety-bill-tech-companies-spent-1-5m-for-this-purpose","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7028","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":59},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
\n Well many tech companies are trying hard and hard to oppose the bill and to stop these bills from passing. They have been investing huge amounts of money on lobbying<\/a> campaigns. The purpose of this campaign is to\u00a0 block the legislation or weaken its impact. By mid-March, these tech firms and their allies had already spent over $1 million on lobbying efforts, as revealed by public disclosures.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n This is the clear indicator of how determined they are to keep their interests protected, even if it means opposing laws designed to safeguard children.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to the New York Post \u201cThis is an astonishing amount of money to be spent to kill two reasonable bills.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n One of the crucial step that protect the children online presence is the SAFE Act. According to this Act children see only those posts in social media platforms that their parents allow. This gives parents more control over what their children are exposed to on these platforms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Additionally, the bill empowers parents to set time limits on their kids' social media use and manage in-app notifications, helping to reduce screen time and distractions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The second Act is also important. This Act works to prevent the collection and selling data<\/a> of users under 18 without consent. The parent consent would be important especially for those children under 13. This law would help safeguard kids' privacy and keep their data secure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Tech companies oppose the law and argue that these Act could limit freedom of speech<\/a>. Furthermore, it can also\u00a0 reduce online privacy for teenagers, restrict internet access for migrants, and hinder algorithms designed to combat hate speech. However, these concerns seem exaggerated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A spokesperson from Meta side mentioned that parental consent should be for children who are under 16 to download apps but against state-specific laws. According to them different state laws would lead to inconsistent online experiences for teens and their parents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As Meta continues to collaborate with New York lawmakers, it's important to avoid quick fixes and instead focus on creating laws that genuinely empower parents and support teens online.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The current push by tech giants to influence legislation is crucial, especially given similar efforts in Australia. The South Australian government is also concerned about their children's safety. They plan to ban the social media platform for children under 14. For those children that are under 15 and 16 need their parents permission in order to use the social media apps. It is a commendable step to secure the privacy of youngsters. <\/p>\n\n\n\n It's also encouraging to see the federal government<\/a> moving forward with an age verification trial to prevent children from accessing content that is not good for them. The main aim of all of these measures is to make a safe online environment for children.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n Additionally, the creation of a new Parliamentary Select Committee to examine the impact of social media on Australian society is significant. This committee will investigate how algorithms and corporate decisions influence what we see online. This step promotes greater transparency and accountability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n So there is a legal battle between Elon Musk<\/a>\u2019s platform, X, and the Federal safety Commissioner. The main purpose of the battle is to block all violent videos that are harmful for children who are under 18. These Act are compulsory to provide an effective online environment and also to protect the online presence of children.\u00a0<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying against online safety bill: Tech companies spent $1.5m for this purpose","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-against-online-safety-bill-tech-companies-spent-1-5m-for-this-purpose","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7028","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":59},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
\n Two types of acts are expected for the future. One is the SAFE Act for Kids and the other is New York Child Data Protection Act. Both of these acts are important in order to save the children's online presence. These bills, which have bipartisan support, aim to stop the exploitation of kids through addictive online feeds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Well many tech companies are trying hard and hard to oppose the bill and to stop these bills from passing. They have been investing huge amounts of money on lobbying<\/a> campaigns. The purpose of this campaign is to\u00a0 block the legislation or weaken its impact. By mid-March, these tech firms and their allies had already spent over $1 million on lobbying efforts, as revealed by public disclosures.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n This is the clear indicator of how determined they are to keep their interests protected, even if it means opposing laws designed to safeguard children.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to the New York Post \u201cThis is an astonishing amount of money to be spent to kill two reasonable bills.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n One of the crucial step that protect the children online presence is the SAFE Act. According to this Act children see only those posts in social media platforms that their parents allow. This gives parents more control over what their children are exposed to on these platforms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Additionally, the bill empowers parents to set time limits on their kids' social media use and manage in-app notifications, helping to reduce screen time and distractions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The second Act is also important. This Act works to prevent the collection and selling data<\/a> of users under 18 without consent. The parent consent would be important especially for those children under 13. This law would help safeguard kids' privacy and keep their data secure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Tech companies oppose the law and argue that these Act could limit freedom of speech<\/a>. Furthermore, it can also\u00a0 reduce online privacy for teenagers, restrict internet access for migrants, and hinder algorithms designed to combat hate speech. However, these concerns seem exaggerated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A spokesperson from Meta side mentioned that parental consent should be for children who are under 16 to download apps but against state-specific laws. According to them different state laws would lead to inconsistent online experiences for teens and their parents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As Meta continues to collaborate with New York lawmakers, it's important to avoid quick fixes and instead focus on creating laws that genuinely empower parents and support teens online.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The current push by tech giants to influence legislation is crucial, especially given similar efforts in Australia. The South Australian government is also concerned about their children's safety. They plan to ban the social media platform for children under 14. For those children that are under 15 and 16 need their parents permission in order to use the social media apps. It is a commendable step to secure the privacy of youngsters. <\/p>\n\n\n\n It's also encouraging to see the federal government<\/a> moving forward with an age verification trial to prevent children from accessing content that is not good for them. The main aim of all of these measures is to make a safe online environment for children.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n Additionally, the creation of a new Parliamentary Select Committee to examine the impact of social media on Australian society is significant. This committee will investigate how algorithms and corporate decisions influence what we see online. This step promotes greater transparency and accountability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n So there is a legal battle between Elon Musk<\/a>\u2019s platform, X, and the Federal safety Commissioner. The main purpose of the battle is to block all violent videos that are harmful for children who are under 18. These Act are compulsory to provide an effective online environment and also to protect the online presence of children.\u00a0<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying against online safety bill: Tech companies spent $1.5m for this purpose","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-against-online-safety-bill-tech-companies-spent-1-5m-for-this-purpose","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7028","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":59},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
\n The main purpose of the bill that they oppose is the safety of children's data. Its aim is to stop collecting and selling data especially for those children that are under 18. It is worrying to see such powerful companies prioritize their interests over the safety and privacy<\/a> of young users.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Two types of acts are expected for the future. One is the SAFE Act for Kids and the other is New York Child Data Protection Act. Both of these acts are important in order to save the children's online presence. These bills, which have bipartisan support, aim to stop the exploitation of kids through addictive online feeds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Well many tech companies are trying hard and hard to oppose the bill and to stop these bills from passing. They have been investing huge amounts of money on lobbying<\/a> campaigns. The purpose of this campaign is to\u00a0 block the legislation or weaken its impact. By mid-March, these tech firms and their allies had already spent over $1 million on lobbying efforts, as revealed by public disclosures.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n This is the clear indicator of how determined they are to keep their interests protected, even if it means opposing laws designed to safeguard children.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to the New York Post \u201cThis is an astonishing amount of money to be spent to kill two reasonable bills.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n One of the crucial step that protect the children online presence is the SAFE Act. According to this Act children see only those posts in social media platforms that their parents allow. This gives parents more control over what their children are exposed to on these platforms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Additionally, the bill empowers parents to set time limits on their kids' social media use and manage in-app notifications, helping to reduce screen time and distractions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The second Act is also important. This Act works to prevent the collection and selling data<\/a> of users under 18 without consent. The parent consent would be important especially for those children under 13. This law would help safeguard kids' privacy and keep their data secure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Tech companies oppose the law and argue that these Act could limit freedom of speech<\/a>. Furthermore, it can also\u00a0 reduce online privacy for teenagers, restrict internet access for migrants, and hinder algorithms designed to combat hate speech. However, these concerns seem exaggerated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A spokesperson from Meta side mentioned that parental consent should be for children who are under 16 to download apps but against state-specific laws. According to them different state laws would lead to inconsistent online experiences for teens and their parents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As Meta continues to collaborate with New York lawmakers, it's important to avoid quick fixes and instead focus on creating laws that genuinely empower parents and support teens online.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The current push by tech giants to influence legislation is crucial, especially given similar efforts in Australia. The South Australian government is also concerned about their children's safety. They plan to ban the social media platform for children under 14. For those children that are under 15 and 16 need their parents permission in order to use the social media apps. It is a commendable step to secure the privacy of youngsters. <\/p>\n\n\n\n It's also encouraging to see the federal government<\/a> moving forward with an age verification trial to prevent children from accessing content that is not good for them. The main aim of all of these measures is to make a safe online environment for children.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n Additionally, the creation of a new Parliamentary Select Committee to examine the impact of social media on Australian society is significant. This committee will investigate how algorithms and corporate decisions influence what we see online. This step promotes greater transparency and accountability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n So there is a legal battle between Elon Musk<\/a>\u2019s platform, X, and the Federal safety Commissioner. The main purpose of the battle is to block all violent videos that are harmful for children who are under 18. These Act are compulsory to provide an effective online environment and also to protect the online presence of children.\u00a0<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying against online safety bill: Tech companies spent $1.5m for this purpose","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-against-online-safety-bill-tech-companies-spent-1-5m-for-this-purpose","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7028","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":59},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
\n It is concerning that Meta and Google spend large amounts of money against bills<\/a> that are designed to save the online privacy of children. These major tech companies spent nearly $1.5 million. According to some recent reports, most of the different technology industries have poured\u00a0 $1.23 million into lobbying lawmakers in Albany, New York.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n The main purpose of the bill that they oppose is the safety of children's data. Its aim is to stop collecting and selling data especially for those children that are under 18. It is worrying to see such powerful companies prioritize their interests over the safety and privacy<\/a> of young users.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Two types of acts are expected for the future. One is the SAFE Act for Kids and the other is New York Child Data Protection Act. Both of these acts are important in order to save the children's online presence. These bills, which have bipartisan support, aim to stop the exploitation of kids through addictive online feeds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Well many tech companies are trying hard and hard to oppose the bill and to stop these bills from passing. They have been investing huge amounts of money on lobbying<\/a> campaigns. The purpose of this campaign is to\u00a0 block the legislation or weaken its impact. By mid-March, these tech firms and their allies had already spent over $1 million on lobbying efforts, as revealed by public disclosures.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n This is the clear indicator of how determined they are to keep their interests protected, even if it means opposing laws designed to safeguard children.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to the New York Post \u201cThis is an astonishing amount of money to be spent to kill two reasonable bills.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n One of the crucial step that protect the children online presence is the SAFE Act. According to this Act children see only those posts in social media platforms that their parents allow. This gives parents more control over what their children are exposed to on these platforms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Additionally, the bill empowers parents to set time limits on their kids' social media use and manage in-app notifications, helping to reduce screen time and distractions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The second Act is also important. This Act works to prevent the collection and selling data<\/a> of users under 18 without consent. The parent consent would be important especially for those children under 13. This law would help safeguard kids' privacy and keep their data secure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Tech companies oppose the law and argue that these Act could limit freedom of speech<\/a>. Furthermore, it can also\u00a0 reduce online privacy for teenagers, restrict internet access for migrants, and hinder algorithms designed to combat hate speech. However, these concerns seem exaggerated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A spokesperson from Meta side mentioned that parental consent should be for children who are under 16 to download apps but against state-specific laws. According to them different state laws would lead to inconsistent online experiences for teens and their parents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As Meta continues to collaborate with New York lawmakers, it's important to avoid quick fixes and instead focus on creating laws that genuinely empower parents and support teens online.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The current push by tech giants to influence legislation is crucial, especially given similar efforts in Australia. The South Australian government is also concerned about their children's safety. They plan to ban the social media platform for children under 14. For those children that are under 15 and 16 need their parents permission in order to use the social media apps. It is a commendable step to secure the privacy of youngsters. <\/p>\n\n\n\n It's also encouraging to see the federal government<\/a> moving forward with an age verification trial to prevent children from accessing content that is not good for them. The main aim of all of these measures is to make a safe online environment for children.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n Additionally, the creation of a new Parliamentary Select Committee to examine the impact of social media on Australian society is significant. This committee will investigate how algorithms and corporate decisions influence what we see online. This step promotes greater transparency and accountability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n So there is a legal battle between Elon Musk<\/a>\u2019s platform, X, and the Federal safety Commissioner. The main purpose of the battle is to block all violent videos that are harmful for children who are under 18. These Act are compulsory to provide an effective online environment and also to protect the online presence of children.\u00a0<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying against online safety bill: Tech companies spent $1.5m for this purpose","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-against-online-safety-bill-tech-companies-spent-1-5m-for-this-purpose","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7028","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":59},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
\n The last gambit from the US in order to break Arab unity over Palestine by different offers. It includes advanced fighter planes, and a defense pact in exchange for normalizing relations with Israel. But this strategic effort of the US is likely to fail. Arab countries are still united in favor of Palestinian rights and peace in the region. If the Arab world sticks to its decision, then independent Palestine could soon be established. <\/p>\n","post_title":"The support of Arab world for Palestine to win the war of liberation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"the-support-of-arab-world-for-palestine-to-win-the-war-of-liberation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7034","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7028,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-05-22 11:39:55","post_date_gmt":"2024-05-22 11:39:55","post_content":"\n It is concerning that Meta and Google spend large amounts of money against bills<\/a> that are designed to save the online privacy of children. These major tech companies spent nearly $1.5 million. According to some recent reports, most of the different technology industries have poured\u00a0 $1.23 million into lobbying lawmakers in Albany, New York.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n The main purpose of the bill that they oppose is the safety of children's data. Its aim is to stop collecting and selling data especially for those children that are under 18. It is worrying to see such powerful companies prioritize their interests over the safety and privacy<\/a> of young users.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Two types of acts are expected for the future. One is the SAFE Act for Kids and the other is New York Child Data Protection Act. Both of these acts are important in order to save the children's online presence. These bills, which have bipartisan support, aim to stop the exploitation of kids through addictive online feeds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Well many tech companies are trying hard and hard to oppose the bill and to stop these bills from passing. They have been investing huge amounts of money on lobbying<\/a> campaigns. The purpose of this campaign is to\u00a0 block the legislation or weaken its impact. By mid-March, these tech firms and their allies had already spent over $1 million on lobbying efforts, as revealed by public disclosures.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n This is the clear indicator of how determined they are to keep their interests protected, even if it means opposing laws designed to safeguard children.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to the New York Post \u201cThis is an astonishing amount of money to be spent to kill two reasonable bills.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n One of the crucial step that protect the children online presence is the SAFE Act. According to this Act children see only those posts in social media platforms that their parents allow. This gives parents more control over what their children are exposed to on these platforms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Additionally, the bill empowers parents to set time limits on their kids' social media use and manage in-app notifications, helping to reduce screen time and distractions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The second Act is also important. This Act works to prevent the collection and selling data<\/a> of users under 18 without consent. The parent consent would be important especially for those children under 13. This law would help safeguard kids' privacy and keep their data secure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Tech companies oppose the law and argue that these Act could limit freedom of speech<\/a>. Furthermore, it can also\u00a0 reduce online privacy for teenagers, restrict internet access for migrants, and hinder algorithms designed to combat hate speech. However, these concerns seem exaggerated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A spokesperson from Meta side mentioned that parental consent should be for children who are under 16 to download apps but against state-specific laws. According to them different state laws would lead to inconsistent online experiences for teens and their parents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As Meta continues to collaborate with New York lawmakers, it's important to avoid quick fixes and instead focus on creating laws that genuinely empower parents and support teens online.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The current push by tech giants to influence legislation is crucial, especially given similar efforts in Australia. The South Australian government is also concerned about their children's safety. They plan to ban the social media platform for children under 14. For those children that are under 15 and 16 need their parents permission in order to use the social media apps. It is a commendable step to secure the privacy of youngsters. <\/p>\n\n\n\n It's also encouraging to see the federal government<\/a> moving forward with an age verification trial to prevent children from accessing content that is not good for them. The main aim of all of these measures is to make a safe online environment for children.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n Additionally, the creation of a new Parliamentary Select Committee to examine the impact of social media on Australian society is significant. This committee will investigate how algorithms and corporate decisions influence what we see online. This step promotes greater transparency and accountability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n So there is a legal battle between Elon Musk<\/a>\u2019s platform, X, and the Federal safety Commissioner. The main purpose of the battle is to block all violent videos that are harmful for children who are under 18. These Act are compulsory to provide an effective online environment and also to protect the online presence of children.\u00a0<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying against online safety bill: Tech companies spent $1.5m for this purpose","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-against-online-safety-bill-tech-companies-spent-1-5m-for-this-purpose","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7028","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":59},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
\n Mainstream US media are now informing the public that, even before last October, Israel's justice system was used to oppress and displace Palestinians and carry out systematic violence. Social media highlights the daily destruction in Gaza, with Israeli soldiers sometimes boasting as they demolish universities, hospitals, or apartment buildings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The last gambit from the US in order to break Arab unity over Palestine by different offers. It includes advanced fighter planes, and a defense pact in exchange for normalizing relations with Israel. But this strategic effort of the US is likely to fail. Arab countries are still united in favor of Palestinian rights and peace in the region. If the Arab world sticks to its decision, then independent Palestine could soon be established. <\/p>\n","post_title":"The support of Arab world for Palestine to win the war of liberation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"the-support-of-arab-world-for-palestine-to-win-the-war-of-liberation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7034","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7028,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-05-22 11:39:55","post_date_gmt":"2024-05-22 11:39:55","post_content":"\n It is concerning that Meta and Google spend large amounts of money against bills<\/a> that are designed to save the online privacy of children. These major tech companies spent nearly $1.5 million. According to some recent reports, most of the different technology industries have poured\u00a0 $1.23 million into lobbying lawmakers in Albany, New York.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n The main purpose of the bill that they oppose is the safety of children's data. Its aim is to stop collecting and selling data especially for those children that are under 18. It is worrying to see such powerful companies prioritize their interests over the safety and privacy<\/a> of young users.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Two types of acts are expected for the future. One is the SAFE Act for Kids and the other is New York Child Data Protection Act. Both of these acts are important in order to save the children's online presence. These bills, which have bipartisan support, aim to stop the exploitation of kids through addictive online feeds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Well many tech companies are trying hard and hard to oppose the bill and to stop these bills from passing. They have been investing huge amounts of money on lobbying<\/a> campaigns. The purpose of this campaign is to\u00a0 block the legislation or weaken its impact. By mid-March, these tech firms and their allies had already spent over $1 million on lobbying efforts, as revealed by public disclosures.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n This is the clear indicator of how determined they are to keep their interests protected, even if it means opposing laws designed to safeguard children.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to the New York Post \u201cThis is an astonishing amount of money to be spent to kill two reasonable bills.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n One of the crucial step that protect the children online presence is the SAFE Act. According to this Act children see only those posts in social media platforms that their parents allow. This gives parents more control over what their children are exposed to on these platforms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Additionally, the bill empowers parents to set time limits on their kids' social media use and manage in-app notifications, helping to reduce screen time and distractions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The second Act is also important. This Act works to prevent the collection and selling data<\/a> of users under 18 without consent. The parent consent would be important especially for those children under 13. This law would help safeguard kids' privacy and keep their data secure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Tech companies oppose the law and argue that these Act could limit freedom of speech<\/a>. Furthermore, it can also\u00a0 reduce online privacy for teenagers, restrict internet access for migrants, and hinder algorithms designed to combat hate speech. However, these concerns seem exaggerated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A spokesperson from Meta side mentioned that parental consent should be for children who are under 16 to download apps but against state-specific laws. According to them different state laws would lead to inconsistent online experiences for teens and their parents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As Meta continues to collaborate with New York lawmakers, it's important to avoid quick fixes and instead focus on creating laws that genuinely empower parents and support teens online.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The current push by tech giants to influence legislation is crucial, especially given similar efforts in Australia. The South Australian government is also concerned about their children's safety. They plan to ban the social media platform for children under 14. For those children that are under 15 and 16 need their parents permission in order to use the social media apps. It is a commendable step to secure the privacy of youngsters. <\/p>\n\n\n\n It's also encouraging to see the federal government<\/a> moving forward with an age verification trial to prevent children from accessing content that is not good for them. The main aim of all of these measures is to make a safe online environment for children.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n Additionally, the creation of a new Parliamentary Select Committee to examine the impact of social media on Australian society is significant. This committee will investigate how algorithms and corporate decisions influence what we see online. This step promotes greater transparency and accountability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n So there is a legal battle between Elon Musk<\/a>\u2019s platform, X, and the Federal safety Commissioner. The main purpose of the battle is to block all violent videos that are harmful for children who are under 18. These Act are compulsory to provide an effective online environment and also to protect the online presence of children.\u00a0<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying against online safety bill: Tech companies spent $1.5m for this purpose","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-against-online-safety-bill-tech-companies-spent-1-5m-for-this-purpose","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7028","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":59},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
\n In order to stop the two-state solution Israel started lobbying in the US. In America's corrupt political system, many political campaigns got the offer of money from Israel for the prevention of a two-state solution. However, lobbying has its limits. American public opinion is increasingly critical of Israel's oppressive policies and violence in Gaza.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Mainstream US media are now informing the public that, even before last October, Israel's justice system was used to oppress and displace Palestinians and carry out systematic violence. Social media highlights the daily destruction in Gaza, with Israeli soldiers sometimes boasting as they demolish universities, hospitals, or apartment buildings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The last gambit from the US in order to break Arab unity over Palestine by different offers. It includes advanced fighter planes, and a defense pact in exchange for normalizing relations with Israel. But this strategic effort of the US is likely to fail. Arab countries are still united in favor of Palestinian rights and peace in the region. If the Arab world sticks to its decision, then independent Palestine could soon be established. <\/p>\n","post_title":"The support of Arab world for Palestine to win the war of liberation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"the-support-of-arab-world-for-palestine-to-win-the-war-of-liberation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7034","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7028,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-05-22 11:39:55","post_date_gmt":"2024-05-22 11:39:55","post_content":"\n It is concerning that Meta and Google spend large amounts of money against bills<\/a> that are designed to save the online privacy of children. These major tech companies spent nearly $1.5 million. According to some recent reports, most of the different technology industries have poured\u00a0 $1.23 million into lobbying lawmakers in Albany, New York.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n The main purpose of the bill that they oppose is the safety of children's data. Its aim is to stop collecting and selling data especially for those children that are under 18. It is worrying to see such powerful companies prioritize their interests over the safety and privacy<\/a> of young users.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Two types of acts are expected for the future. One is the SAFE Act for Kids and the other is New York Child Data Protection Act. Both of these acts are important in order to save the children's online presence. These bills, which have bipartisan support, aim to stop the exploitation of kids through addictive online feeds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Well many tech companies are trying hard and hard to oppose the bill and to stop these bills from passing. They have been investing huge amounts of money on lobbying<\/a> campaigns. The purpose of this campaign is to\u00a0 block the legislation or weaken its impact. By mid-March, these tech firms and their allies had already spent over $1 million on lobbying efforts, as revealed by public disclosures.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n This is the clear indicator of how determined they are to keep their interests protected, even if it means opposing laws designed to safeguard children.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to the New York Post \u201cThis is an astonishing amount of money to be spent to kill two reasonable bills.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n One of the crucial step that protect the children online presence is the SAFE Act. According to this Act children see only those posts in social media platforms that their parents allow. This gives parents more control over what their children are exposed to on these platforms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Additionally, the bill empowers parents to set time limits on their kids' social media use and manage in-app notifications, helping to reduce screen time and distractions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The second Act is also important. This Act works to prevent the collection and selling data<\/a> of users under 18 without consent. The parent consent would be important especially for those children under 13. This law would help safeguard kids' privacy and keep their data secure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Tech companies oppose the law and argue that these Act could limit freedom of speech<\/a>. Furthermore, it can also\u00a0 reduce online privacy for teenagers, restrict internet access for migrants, and hinder algorithms designed to combat hate speech. However, these concerns seem exaggerated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A spokesperson from Meta side mentioned that parental consent should be for children who are under 16 to download apps but against state-specific laws. According to them different state laws would lead to inconsistent online experiences for teens and their parents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As Meta continues to collaborate with New York lawmakers, it's important to avoid quick fixes and instead focus on creating laws that genuinely empower parents and support teens online.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The current push by tech giants to influence legislation is crucial, especially given similar efforts in Australia. The South Australian government is also concerned about their children's safety. They plan to ban the social media platform for children under 14. For those children that are under 15 and 16 need their parents permission in order to use the social media apps. It is a commendable step to secure the privacy of youngsters. <\/p>\n\n\n\n It's also encouraging to see the federal government<\/a> moving forward with an age verification trial to prevent children from accessing content that is not good for them. The main aim of all of these measures is to make a safe online environment for children.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n Additionally, the creation of a new Parliamentary Select Committee to examine the impact of social media on Australian society is significant. This committee will investigate how algorithms and corporate decisions influence what we see online. This step promotes greater transparency and accountability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n So there is a legal battle between Elon Musk<\/a>\u2019s platform, X, and the Federal safety Commissioner. The main purpose of the battle is to block all violent videos that are harmful for children who are under 18. These Act are compulsory to provide an effective online environment and also to protect the online presence of children.\u00a0<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying against online safety bill: Tech companies spent $1.5m for this purpose","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-against-online-safety-bill-tech-companies-spent-1-5m-for-this-purpose","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7028","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":59},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
\n Due to diplomatic efforts and international law pressure the United State is becoming isolated. Furthermore, Israel got notification from the International Court of Justice to stop operations in Rafah. This is due to that Israel may be violating the 1948 Genocide Convention. Arrest Warrants are issued against the Israeli leaders and 3 Hamas leaders. The US may need to adjust its stance to avoid isolation, which threatens its security and national interests. It is important for the US to maintain its relationship with the Arab world. <\/p>\n\n\n\n In order to stop the two-state solution Israel started lobbying in the US. In America's corrupt political system, many political campaigns got the offer of money from Israel for the prevention of a two-state solution. However, lobbying has its limits. American public opinion is increasingly critical of Israel's oppressive policies and violence in Gaza.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Mainstream US media are now informing the public that, even before last October, Israel's justice system was used to oppress and displace Palestinians and carry out systematic violence. Social media highlights the daily destruction in Gaza, with Israeli soldiers sometimes boasting as they demolish universities, hospitals, or apartment buildings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The last gambit from the US in order to break Arab unity over Palestine by different offers. It includes advanced fighter planes, and a defense pact in exchange for normalizing relations with Israel. But this strategic effort of the US is likely to fail. Arab countries are still united in favor of Palestinian rights and peace in the region. If the Arab world sticks to its decision, then independent Palestine could soon be established. <\/p>\n","post_title":"The support of Arab world for Palestine to win the war of liberation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"the-support-of-arab-world-for-palestine-to-win-the-war-of-liberation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7034","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7028,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-05-22 11:39:55","post_date_gmt":"2024-05-22 11:39:55","post_content":"\n It is concerning that Meta and Google spend large amounts of money against bills<\/a> that are designed to save the online privacy of children. These major tech companies spent nearly $1.5 million. According to some recent reports, most of the different technology industries have poured\u00a0 $1.23 million into lobbying lawmakers in Albany, New York.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n The main purpose of the bill that they oppose is the safety of children's data. Its aim is to stop collecting and selling data especially for those children that are under 18. It is worrying to see such powerful companies prioritize their interests over the safety and privacy<\/a> of young users.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Two types of acts are expected for the future. One is the SAFE Act for Kids and the other is New York Child Data Protection Act. Both of these acts are important in order to save the children's online presence. These bills, which have bipartisan support, aim to stop the exploitation of kids through addictive online feeds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Well many tech companies are trying hard and hard to oppose the bill and to stop these bills from passing. They have been investing huge amounts of money on lobbying<\/a> campaigns. The purpose of this campaign is to\u00a0 block the legislation or weaken its impact. By mid-March, these tech firms and their allies had already spent over $1 million on lobbying efforts, as revealed by public disclosures.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n This is the clear indicator of how determined they are to keep their interests protected, even if it means opposing laws designed to safeguard children.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to the New York Post \u201cThis is an astonishing amount of money to be spent to kill two reasonable bills.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n One of the crucial step that protect the children online presence is the SAFE Act. According to this Act children see only those posts in social media platforms that their parents allow. This gives parents more control over what their children are exposed to on these platforms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Additionally, the bill empowers parents to set time limits on their kids' social media use and manage in-app notifications, helping to reduce screen time and distractions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The second Act is also important. This Act works to prevent the collection and selling data<\/a> of users under 18 without consent. The parent consent would be important especially for those children under 13. This law would help safeguard kids' privacy and keep their data secure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Tech companies oppose the law and argue that these Act could limit freedom of speech<\/a>. Furthermore, it can also\u00a0 reduce online privacy for teenagers, restrict internet access for migrants, and hinder algorithms designed to combat hate speech. However, these concerns seem exaggerated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A spokesperson from Meta side mentioned that parental consent should be for children who are under 16 to download apps but against state-specific laws. According to them different state laws would lead to inconsistent online experiences for teens and their parents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As Meta continues to collaborate with New York lawmakers, it's important to avoid quick fixes and instead focus on creating laws that genuinely empower parents and support teens online.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The current push by tech giants to influence legislation is crucial, especially given similar efforts in Australia. The South Australian government is also concerned about their children's safety. They plan to ban the social media platform for children under 14. For those children that are under 15 and 16 need their parents permission in order to use the social media apps. It is a commendable step to secure the privacy of youngsters. <\/p>\n\n\n\n It's also encouraging to see the federal government<\/a> moving forward with an age verification trial to prevent children from accessing content that is not good for them. The main aim of all of these measures is to make a safe online environment for children.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n Additionally, the creation of a new Parliamentary Select Committee to examine the impact of social media on Australian society is significant. This committee will investigate how algorithms and corporate decisions influence what we see online. This step promotes greater transparency and accountability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n So there is a legal battle between Elon Musk<\/a>\u2019s platform, X, and the Federal safety Commissioner. The main purpose of the battle is to block all violent videos that are harmful for children who are under 18. These Act are compulsory to provide an effective online environment and also to protect the online presence of children.\u00a0<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying against online safety bill: Tech companies spent $1.5m for this purpose","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-against-online-safety-bill-tech-companies-spent-1-5m-for-this-purpose","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7028","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":59},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
\n On May 10, the UN General Assembly strongly supported Palestine\u2019s bid for UN membership with a 143-9 vote. Many countries support this decision such as Norway, Spain, and Ireland clearly declared on May 22, to recognize a Palestinian state. At the same time the Irish Prime Minister also said that more countries would follow.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Due to diplomatic efforts and international law pressure the United State is becoming isolated. Furthermore, Israel got notification from the International Court of Justice to stop operations in Rafah. This is due to that Israel may be violating the 1948 Genocide Convention. Arrest Warrants are issued against the Israeli leaders and 3 Hamas leaders. The US may need to adjust its stance to avoid isolation, which threatens its security and national interests. It is important for the US to maintain its relationship with the Arab world. <\/p>\n\n\n\n In order to stop the two-state solution Israel started lobbying in the US. In America's corrupt political system, many political campaigns got the offer of money from Israel for the prevention of a two-state solution. However, lobbying has its limits. American public opinion is increasingly critical of Israel's oppressive policies and violence in Gaza.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Mainstream US media are now informing the public that, even before last October, Israel's justice system was used to oppress and displace Palestinians and carry out systematic violence. Social media highlights the daily destruction in Gaza, with Israeli soldiers sometimes boasting as they demolish universities, hospitals, or apartment buildings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The last gambit from the US in order to break Arab unity over Palestine by different offers. It includes advanced fighter planes, and a defense pact in exchange for normalizing relations with Israel. But this strategic effort of the US is likely to fail. Arab countries are still united in favor of Palestinian rights and peace in the region. If the Arab world sticks to its decision, then independent Palestine could soon be established. <\/p>\n","post_title":"The support of Arab world for Palestine to win the war of liberation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"the-support-of-arab-world-for-palestine-to-win-the-war-of-liberation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7034","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7028,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-05-22 11:39:55","post_date_gmt":"2024-05-22 11:39:55","post_content":"\n It is concerning that Meta and Google spend large amounts of money against bills<\/a> that are designed to save the online privacy of children. These major tech companies spent nearly $1.5 million. According to some recent reports, most of the different technology industries have poured\u00a0 $1.23 million into lobbying lawmakers in Albany, New York.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n The main purpose of the bill that they oppose is the safety of children's data. Its aim is to stop collecting and selling data especially for those children that are under 18. It is worrying to see such powerful companies prioritize their interests over the safety and privacy<\/a> of young users.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Two types of acts are expected for the future. One is the SAFE Act for Kids and the other is New York Child Data Protection Act. Both of these acts are important in order to save the children's online presence. These bills, which have bipartisan support, aim to stop the exploitation of kids through addictive online feeds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Well many tech companies are trying hard and hard to oppose the bill and to stop these bills from passing. They have been investing huge amounts of money on lobbying<\/a> campaigns. The purpose of this campaign is to\u00a0 block the legislation or weaken its impact. By mid-March, these tech firms and their allies had already spent over $1 million on lobbying efforts, as revealed by public disclosures.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n This is the clear indicator of how determined they are to keep their interests protected, even if it means opposing laws designed to safeguard children.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to the New York Post \u201cThis is an astonishing amount of money to be spent to kill two reasonable bills.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n One of the crucial step that protect the children online presence is the SAFE Act. According to this Act children see only those posts in social media platforms that their parents allow. This gives parents more control over what their children are exposed to on these platforms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Additionally, the bill empowers parents to set time limits on their kids' social media use and manage in-app notifications, helping to reduce screen time and distractions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The second Act is also important. This Act works to prevent the collection and selling data<\/a> of users under 18 without consent. The parent consent would be important especially for those children under 13. This law would help safeguard kids' privacy and keep their data secure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Tech companies oppose the law and argue that these Act could limit freedom of speech<\/a>. Furthermore, it can also\u00a0 reduce online privacy for teenagers, restrict internet access for migrants, and hinder algorithms designed to combat hate speech. However, these concerns seem exaggerated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A spokesperson from Meta side mentioned that parental consent should be for children who are under 16 to download apps but against state-specific laws. According to them different state laws would lead to inconsistent online experiences for teens and their parents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As Meta continues to collaborate with New York lawmakers, it's important to avoid quick fixes and instead focus on creating laws that genuinely empower parents and support teens online.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The current push by tech giants to influence legislation is crucial, especially given similar efforts in Australia. The South Australian government is also concerned about their children's safety. They plan to ban the social media platform for children under 14. For those children that are under 15 and 16 need their parents permission in order to use the social media apps. It is a commendable step to secure the privacy of youngsters. <\/p>\n\n\n\n It's also encouraging to see the federal government<\/a> moving forward with an age verification trial to prevent children from accessing content that is not good for them. The main aim of all of these measures is to make a safe online environment for children.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n Additionally, the creation of a new Parliamentary Select Committee to examine the impact of social media on Australian society is significant. This committee will investigate how algorithms and corporate decisions influence what we see online. This step promotes greater transparency and accountability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n So there is a legal battle between Elon Musk<\/a>\u2019s platform, X, and the Federal safety Commissioner. The main purpose of the battle is to block all violent videos that are harmful for children who are under 18. These Act are compulsory to provide an effective online environment and also to protect the online presence of children.\u00a0<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying against online safety bill: Tech companies spent $1.5m for this purpose","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-against-online-safety-bill-tech-companies-spent-1-5m-for-this-purpose","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7028","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":59},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
\n After this the Arab leader's efforts for the establishment of a separate state for Plastine have gained momentum. On March 25, the United Nation Security Council called for an immediate ceasefire. Israel ignored it. On April 18, finally the UN Security Council supported the decision of Palestine membership in the UN. This decision is strongly opposed by the US and UK and Switzerland abstaining. <\/p>\n\n\n\n On May 10, the UN General Assembly strongly supported Palestine\u2019s bid for UN membership with a 143-9 vote. Many countries support this decision such as Norway, Spain, and Ireland clearly declared on May 22, to recognize a Palestinian state. At the same time the Irish Prime Minister also said that more countries would follow.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Due to diplomatic efforts and international law pressure the United State is becoming isolated. Furthermore, Israel got notification from the International Court of Justice to stop operations in Rafah. This is due to that Israel may be violating the 1948 Genocide Convention. Arrest Warrants are issued against the Israeli leaders and 3 Hamas leaders. The US may need to adjust its stance to avoid isolation, which threatens its security and national interests. It is important for the US to maintain its relationship with the Arab world. <\/p>\n\n\n\n In order to stop the two-state solution Israel started lobbying in the US. In America's corrupt political system, many political campaigns got the offer of money from Israel for the prevention of a two-state solution. However, lobbying has its limits. American public opinion is increasingly critical of Israel's oppressive policies and violence in Gaza.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Mainstream US media are now informing the public that, even before last October, Israel's justice system was used to oppress and displace Palestinians and carry out systematic violence. Social media highlights the daily destruction in Gaza, with Israeli soldiers sometimes boasting as they demolish universities, hospitals, or apartment buildings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The last gambit from the US in order to break Arab unity over Palestine by different offers. It includes advanced fighter planes, and a defense pact in exchange for normalizing relations with Israel. But this strategic effort of the US is likely to fail. Arab countries are still united in favor of Palestinian rights and peace in the region. If the Arab world sticks to its decision, then independent Palestine could soon be established. <\/p>\n","post_title":"The support of Arab world for Palestine to win the war of liberation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"the-support-of-arab-world-for-palestine-to-win-the-war-of-liberation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7034","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7028,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-05-22 11:39:55","post_date_gmt":"2024-05-22 11:39:55","post_content":"\n It is concerning that Meta and Google spend large amounts of money against bills<\/a> that are designed to save the online privacy of children. These major tech companies spent nearly $1.5 million. According to some recent reports, most of the different technology industries have poured\u00a0 $1.23 million into lobbying lawmakers in Albany, New York.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n The main purpose of the bill that they oppose is the safety of children's data. Its aim is to stop collecting and selling data especially for those children that are under 18. It is worrying to see such powerful companies prioritize their interests over the safety and privacy<\/a> of young users.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Two types of acts are expected for the future. One is the SAFE Act for Kids and the other is New York Child Data Protection Act. Both of these acts are important in order to save the children's online presence. These bills, which have bipartisan support, aim to stop the exploitation of kids through addictive online feeds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Well many tech companies are trying hard and hard to oppose the bill and to stop these bills from passing. They have been investing huge amounts of money on lobbying<\/a> campaigns. The purpose of this campaign is to\u00a0 block the legislation or weaken its impact. By mid-March, these tech firms and their allies had already spent over $1 million on lobbying efforts, as revealed by public disclosures.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n This is the clear indicator of how determined they are to keep their interests protected, even if it means opposing laws designed to safeguard children.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to the New York Post \u201cThis is an astonishing amount of money to be spent to kill two reasonable bills.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n One of the crucial step that protect the children online presence is the SAFE Act. According to this Act children see only those posts in social media platforms that their parents allow. This gives parents more control over what their children are exposed to on these platforms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Additionally, the bill empowers parents to set time limits on their kids' social media use and manage in-app notifications, helping to reduce screen time and distractions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The second Act is also important. This Act works to prevent the collection and selling data<\/a> of users under 18 without consent. The parent consent would be important especially for those children under 13. This law would help safeguard kids' privacy and keep their data secure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Tech companies oppose the law and argue that these Act could limit freedom of speech<\/a>. Furthermore, it can also\u00a0 reduce online privacy for teenagers, restrict internet access for migrants, and hinder algorithms designed to combat hate speech. However, these concerns seem exaggerated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A spokesperson from Meta side mentioned that parental consent should be for children who are under 16 to download apps but against state-specific laws. According to them different state laws would lead to inconsistent online experiences for teens and their parents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As Meta continues to collaborate with New York lawmakers, it's important to avoid quick fixes and instead focus on creating laws that genuinely empower parents and support teens online.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The current push by tech giants to influence legislation is crucial, especially given similar efforts in Australia. The South Australian government is also concerned about their children's safety. They plan to ban the social media platform for children under 14. For those children that are under 15 and 16 need their parents permission in order to use the social media apps. It is a commendable step to secure the privacy of youngsters. <\/p>\n\n\n\n It's also encouraging to see the federal government<\/a> moving forward with an age verification trial to prevent children from accessing content that is not good for them. The main aim of all of these measures is to make a safe online environment for children.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n Additionally, the creation of a new Parliamentary Select Committee to examine the impact of social media on Australian society is significant. This committee will investigate how algorithms and corporate decisions influence what we see online. This step promotes greater transparency and accountability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n So there is a legal battle between Elon Musk<\/a>\u2019s platform, X, and the Federal safety Commissioner. The main purpose of the battle is to block all violent videos that are harmful for children who are under 18. These Act are compulsory to provide an effective online environment and also to protect the online presence of children.\u00a0<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying against online safety bill: Tech companies spent $1.5m for this purpose","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-against-online-safety-bill-tech-companies-spent-1-5m-for-this-purpose","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7028","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":59},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
\n For more than two decades Arab countries have wanted peace for Palestine and have supported the two-state solution for Palestine and Israel. In 2002 the most crucial step came forward with the Arab Peace Initiatives. At the same time Israel strongly opposed this offer and the US stood with Israel\u2019s stance. Following the Gaza War's outbreak in October, Arab and Islamic leaders reaffirmed the peace proposal at a meeting in Riyadh in November.<\/p>\n\n\n\n After this the Arab leader's efforts for the establishment of a separate state for Plastine have gained momentum. On March 25, the United Nation Security Council called for an immediate ceasefire. Israel ignored it. On April 18, finally the UN Security Council supported the decision of Palestine membership in the UN. This decision is strongly opposed by the US and UK and Switzerland abstaining. <\/p>\n\n\n\n On May 10, the UN General Assembly strongly supported Palestine\u2019s bid for UN membership with a 143-9 vote. Many countries support this decision such as Norway, Spain, and Ireland clearly declared on May 22, to recognize a Palestinian state. At the same time the Irish Prime Minister also said that more countries would follow.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Due to diplomatic efforts and international law pressure the United State is becoming isolated. Furthermore, Israel got notification from the International Court of Justice to stop operations in Rafah. This is due to that Israel may be violating the 1948 Genocide Convention. Arrest Warrants are issued against the Israeli leaders and 3 Hamas leaders. The US may need to adjust its stance to avoid isolation, which threatens its security and national interests. It is important for the US to maintain its relationship with the Arab world. <\/p>\n\n\n\n In order to stop the two-state solution Israel started lobbying in the US. In America's corrupt political system, many political campaigns got the offer of money from Israel for the prevention of a two-state solution. However, lobbying has its limits. American public opinion is increasingly critical of Israel's oppressive policies and violence in Gaza.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Mainstream US media are now informing the public that, even before last October, Israel's justice system was used to oppress and displace Palestinians and carry out systematic violence. Social media highlights the daily destruction in Gaza, with Israeli soldiers sometimes boasting as they demolish universities, hospitals, or apartment buildings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The last gambit from the US in order to break Arab unity over Palestine by different offers. It includes advanced fighter planes, and a defense pact in exchange for normalizing relations with Israel. But this strategic effort of the US is likely to fail. Arab countries are still united in favor of Palestinian rights and peace in the region. If the Arab world sticks to its decision, then independent Palestine could soon be established. <\/p>\n","post_title":"The support of Arab world for Palestine to win the war of liberation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"the-support-of-arab-world-for-palestine-to-win-the-war-of-liberation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7034","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7028,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-05-22 11:39:55","post_date_gmt":"2024-05-22 11:39:55","post_content":"\n It is concerning that Meta and Google spend large amounts of money against bills<\/a> that are designed to save the online privacy of children. These major tech companies spent nearly $1.5 million. According to some recent reports, most of the different technology industries have poured\u00a0 $1.23 million into lobbying lawmakers in Albany, New York.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n The main purpose of the bill that they oppose is the safety of children's data. Its aim is to stop collecting and selling data especially for those children that are under 18. It is worrying to see such powerful companies prioritize their interests over the safety and privacy<\/a> of young users.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Two types of acts are expected for the future. One is the SAFE Act for Kids and the other is New York Child Data Protection Act. Both of these acts are important in order to save the children's online presence. These bills, which have bipartisan support, aim to stop the exploitation of kids through addictive online feeds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Well many tech companies are trying hard and hard to oppose the bill and to stop these bills from passing. They have been investing huge amounts of money on lobbying<\/a> campaigns. The purpose of this campaign is to\u00a0 block the legislation or weaken its impact. By mid-March, these tech firms and their allies had already spent over $1 million on lobbying efforts, as revealed by public disclosures.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n This is the clear indicator of how determined they are to keep their interests protected, even if it means opposing laws designed to safeguard children.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to the New York Post \u201cThis is an astonishing amount of money to be spent to kill two reasonable bills.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n One of the crucial step that protect the children online presence is the SAFE Act. According to this Act children see only those posts in social media platforms that their parents allow. This gives parents more control over what their children are exposed to on these platforms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Additionally, the bill empowers parents to set time limits on their kids' social media use and manage in-app notifications, helping to reduce screen time and distractions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The second Act is also important. This Act works to prevent the collection and selling data<\/a> of users under 18 without consent. The parent consent would be important especially for those children under 13. This law would help safeguard kids' privacy and keep their data secure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Tech companies oppose the law and argue that these Act could limit freedom of speech<\/a>. Furthermore, it can also\u00a0 reduce online privacy for teenagers, restrict internet access for migrants, and hinder algorithms designed to combat hate speech. However, these concerns seem exaggerated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A spokesperson from Meta side mentioned that parental consent should be for children who are under 16 to download apps but against state-specific laws. According to them different state laws would lead to inconsistent online experiences for teens and their parents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As Meta continues to collaborate with New York lawmakers, it's important to avoid quick fixes and instead focus on creating laws that genuinely empower parents and support teens online.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The current push by tech giants to influence legislation is crucial, especially given similar efforts in Australia. The South Australian government is also concerned about their children's safety. They plan to ban the social media platform for children under 14. For those children that are under 15 and 16 need their parents permission in order to use the social media apps. It is a commendable step to secure the privacy of youngsters. <\/p>\n\n\n\n It's also encouraging to see the federal government<\/a> moving forward with an age verification trial to prevent children from accessing content that is not good for them. The main aim of all of these measures is to make a safe online environment for children.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n Additionally, the creation of a new Parliamentary Select Committee to examine the impact of social media on Australian society is significant. This committee will investigate how algorithms and corporate decisions influence what we see online. This step promotes greater transparency and accountability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n So there is a legal battle between Elon Musk<\/a>\u2019s platform, X, and the Federal safety Commissioner. The main purpose of the battle is to block all violent videos that are harmful for children who are under 18. These Act are compulsory to provide an effective online environment and also to protect the online presence of children.\u00a0<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying against online safety bill: Tech companies spent $1.5m for this purpose","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-against-online-safety-bill-tech-companies-spent-1-5m-for-this-purpose","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7028","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":59},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
\n For more than two decades, Arab countries have increasingly supported the two-state solution for Israel and Palestine. The major step forward came in 2002 with the Arab Peace Initiative, though Israel rejected this offer and the US consistently supported Israel's stance. Following the Gaza War's outbreak in October, Arab and Islamic leaders reaffirmed the peace proposal at a meeting in Riyadh in November.<\/p>\n\n\n\n For more than two decades Arab countries have wanted peace for Palestine and have supported the two-state solution for Palestine and Israel. In 2002 the most crucial step came forward with the Arab Peace Initiatives. At the same time Israel strongly opposed this offer and the US stood with Israel\u2019s stance. Following the Gaza War's outbreak in October, Arab and Islamic leaders reaffirmed the peace proposal at a meeting in Riyadh in November.<\/p>\n\n\n\n After this the Arab leader's efforts for the establishment of a separate state for Plastine have gained momentum. On March 25, the United Nation Security Council called for an immediate ceasefire. Israel ignored it. On April 18, finally the UN Security Council supported the decision of Palestine membership in the UN. This decision is strongly opposed by the US and UK and Switzerland abstaining. <\/p>\n\n\n\n On May 10, the UN General Assembly strongly supported Palestine\u2019s bid for UN membership with a 143-9 vote. Many countries support this decision such as Norway, Spain, and Ireland clearly declared on May 22, to recognize a Palestinian state. At the same time the Irish Prime Minister also said that more countries would follow.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Due to diplomatic efforts and international law pressure the United State is becoming isolated. Furthermore, Israel got notification from the International Court of Justice to stop operations in Rafah. This is due to that Israel may be violating the 1948 Genocide Convention. Arrest Warrants are issued against the Israeli leaders and 3 Hamas leaders. The US may need to adjust its stance to avoid isolation, which threatens its security and national interests. It is important for the US to maintain its relationship with the Arab world. <\/p>\n\n\n\n In order to stop the two-state solution Israel started lobbying in the US. In America's corrupt political system, many political campaigns got the offer of money from Israel for the prevention of a two-state solution. However, lobbying has its limits. American public opinion is increasingly critical of Israel's oppressive policies and violence in Gaza.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Mainstream US media are now informing the public that, even before last October, Israel's justice system was used to oppress and displace Palestinians and carry out systematic violence. Social media highlights the daily destruction in Gaza, with Israeli soldiers sometimes boasting as they demolish universities, hospitals, or apartment buildings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The last gambit from the US in order to break Arab unity over Palestine by different offers. It includes advanced fighter planes, and a defense pact in exchange for normalizing relations with Israel. But this strategic effort of the US is likely to fail. Arab countries are still united in favor of Palestinian rights and peace in the region. If the Arab world sticks to its decision, then independent Palestine could soon be established. <\/p>\n","post_title":"The support of Arab world for Palestine to win the war of liberation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"the-support-of-arab-world-for-palestine-to-win-the-war-of-liberation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7034","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7028,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-05-22 11:39:55","post_date_gmt":"2024-05-22 11:39:55","post_content":"\n It is concerning that Meta and Google spend large amounts of money against bills<\/a> that are designed to save the online privacy of children. These major tech companies spent nearly $1.5 million. According to some recent reports, most of the different technology industries have poured\u00a0 $1.23 million into lobbying lawmakers in Albany, New York.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n The main purpose of the bill that they oppose is the safety of children's data. Its aim is to stop collecting and selling data especially for those children that are under 18. It is worrying to see such powerful companies prioritize their interests over the safety and privacy<\/a> of young users.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Two types of acts are expected for the future. One is the SAFE Act for Kids and the other is New York Child Data Protection Act. Both of these acts are important in order to save the children's online presence. These bills, which have bipartisan support, aim to stop the exploitation of kids through addictive online feeds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Well many tech companies are trying hard and hard to oppose the bill and to stop these bills from passing. They have been investing huge amounts of money on lobbying<\/a> campaigns. The purpose of this campaign is to\u00a0 block the legislation or weaken its impact. By mid-March, these tech firms and their allies had already spent over $1 million on lobbying efforts, as revealed by public disclosures.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n This is the clear indicator of how determined they are to keep their interests protected, even if it means opposing laws designed to safeguard children.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to the New York Post \u201cThis is an astonishing amount of money to be spent to kill two reasonable bills.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n One of the crucial step that protect the children online presence is the SAFE Act. According to this Act children see only those posts in social media platforms that their parents allow. This gives parents more control over what their children are exposed to on these platforms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Additionally, the bill empowers parents to set time limits on their kids' social media use and manage in-app notifications, helping to reduce screen time and distractions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The second Act is also important. This Act works to prevent the collection and selling data<\/a> of users under 18 without consent. The parent consent would be important especially for those children under 13. This law would help safeguard kids' privacy and keep their data secure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Tech companies oppose the law and argue that these Act could limit freedom of speech<\/a>. Furthermore, it can also\u00a0 reduce online privacy for teenagers, restrict internet access for migrants, and hinder algorithms designed to combat hate speech. However, these concerns seem exaggerated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A spokesperson from Meta side mentioned that parental consent should be for children who are under 16 to download apps but against state-specific laws. According to them different state laws would lead to inconsistent online experiences for teens and their parents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As Meta continues to collaborate with New York lawmakers, it's important to avoid quick fixes and instead focus on creating laws that genuinely empower parents and support teens online.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The current push by tech giants to influence legislation is crucial, especially given similar efforts in Australia. The South Australian government is also concerned about their children's safety. They plan to ban the social media platform for children under 14. For those children that are under 15 and 16 need their parents permission in order to use the social media apps. It is a commendable step to secure the privacy of youngsters. <\/p>\n\n\n\n It's also encouraging to see the federal government<\/a> moving forward with an age verification trial to prevent children from accessing content that is not good for them. The main aim of all of these measures is to make a safe online environment for children.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n Additionally, the creation of a new Parliamentary Select Committee to examine the impact of social media on Australian society is significant. This committee will investigate how algorithms and corporate decisions influence what we see online. This step promotes greater transparency and accountability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n So there is a legal battle between Elon Musk<\/a>\u2019s platform, X, and the Federal safety Commissioner. The main purpose of the battle is to block all violent videos that are harmful for children who are under 18. These Act are compulsory to provide an effective online environment and also to protect the online presence of children.\u00a0<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying against online safety bill: Tech companies spent $1.5m for this purpose","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-against-online-safety-bill-tech-companies-spent-1-5m-for-this-purpose","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7028","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":59},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
\n Furthermore, in order to discuss Palestine issues, the Bahrain Declaration calls for an international conference. The aim of this conference is to establish an independent Palestine where Palestinians can live peacefully without any restriction of Israel. Also the agenda of the meeting is to end the Israeli occupation of all occupied Arab territories. All of this effort is based upon the international resolution for the sake of peace. <\/p>\n\n\n\n For more than two decades, Arab countries have increasingly supported the two-state solution for Israel and Palestine. The major step forward came in 2002 with the Arab Peace Initiative, though Israel rejected this offer and the US consistently supported Israel's stance. Following the Gaza War's outbreak in October, Arab and Islamic leaders reaffirmed the peace proposal at a meeting in Riyadh in November.<\/p>\n\n\n\n For more than two decades Arab countries have wanted peace for Palestine and have supported the two-state solution for Palestine and Israel. In 2002 the most crucial step came forward with the Arab Peace Initiatives. At the same time Israel strongly opposed this offer and the US stood with Israel\u2019s stance. Following the Gaza War's outbreak in October, Arab and Islamic leaders reaffirmed the peace proposal at a meeting in Riyadh in November.<\/p>\n\n\n\n After this the Arab leader's efforts for the establishment of a separate state for Plastine have gained momentum. On March 25, the United Nation Security Council called for an immediate ceasefire. Israel ignored it. On April 18, finally the UN Security Council supported the decision of Palestine membership in the UN. This decision is strongly opposed by the US and UK and Switzerland abstaining. <\/p>\n\n\n\n On May 10, the UN General Assembly strongly supported Palestine\u2019s bid for UN membership with a 143-9 vote. Many countries support this decision such as Norway, Spain, and Ireland clearly declared on May 22, to recognize a Palestinian state. At the same time the Irish Prime Minister also said that more countries would follow.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Due to diplomatic efforts and international law pressure the United State is becoming isolated. Furthermore, Israel got notification from the International Court of Justice to stop operations in Rafah. This is due to that Israel may be violating the 1948 Genocide Convention. Arrest Warrants are issued against the Israeli leaders and 3 Hamas leaders. The US may need to adjust its stance to avoid isolation, which threatens its security and national interests. It is important for the US to maintain its relationship with the Arab world. <\/p>\n\n\n\n In order to stop the two-state solution Israel started lobbying in the US. In America's corrupt political system, many political campaigns got the offer of money from Israel for the prevention of a two-state solution. However, lobbying has its limits. American public opinion is increasingly critical of Israel's oppressive policies and violence in Gaza.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Mainstream US media are now informing the public that, even before last October, Israel's justice system was used to oppress and displace Palestinians and carry out systematic violence. Social media highlights the daily destruction in Gaza, with Israeli soldiers sometimes boasting as they demolish universities, hospitals, or apartment buildings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The last gambit from the US in order to break Arab unity over Palestine by different offers. It includes advanced fighter planes, and a defense pact in exchange for normalizing relations with Israel. But this strategic effort of the US is likely to fail. Arab countries are still united in favor of Palestinian rights and peace in the region. If the Arab world sticks to its decision, then independent Palestine could soon be established. <\/p>\n","post_title":"The support of Arab world for Palestine to win the war of liberation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"the-support-of-arab-world-for-palestine-to-win-the-war-of-liberation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7034","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7028,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-05-22 11:39:55","post_date_gmt":"2024-05-22 11:39:55","post_content":"\n It is concerning that Meta and Google spend large amounts of money against bills<\/a> that are designed to save the online privacy of children. These major tech companies spent nearly $1.5 million. According to some recent reports, most of the different technology industries have poured\u00a0 $1.23 million into lobbying lawmakers in Albany, New York.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n The main purpose of the bill that they oppose is the safety of children's data. Its aim is to stop collecting and selling data especially for those children that are under 18. It is worrying to see such powerful companies prioritize their interests over the safety and privacy<\/a> of young users.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Two types of acts are expected for the future. One is the SAFE Act for Kids and the other is New York Child Data Protection Act. Both of these acts are important in order to save the children's online presence. These bills, which have bipartisan support, aim to stop the exploitation of kids through addictive online feeds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Well many tech companies are trying hard and hard to oppose the bill and to stop these bills from passing. They have been investing huge amounts of money on lobbying<\/a> campaigns. The purpose of this campaign is to\u00a0 block the legislation or weaken its impact. By mid-March, these tech firms and their allies had already spent over $1 million on lobbying efforts, as revealed by public disclosures.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n This is the clear indicator of how determined they are to keep their interests protected, even if it means opposing laws designed to safeguard children.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to the New York Post \u201cThis is an astonishing amount of money to be spent to kill two reasonable bills.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n One of the crucial step that protect the children online presence is the SAFE Act. According to this Act children see only those posts in social media platforms that their parents allow. This gives parents more control over what their children are exposed to on these platforms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Additionally, the bill empowers parents to set time limits on their kids' social media use and manage in-app notifications, helping to reduce screen time and distractions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The second Act is also important. This Act works to prevent the collection and selling data<\/a> of users under 18 without consent. The parent consent would be important especially for those children under 13. This law would help safeguard kids' privacy and keep their data secure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Tech companies oppose the law and argue that these Act could limit freedom of speech<\/a>. Furthermore, it can also\u00a0 reduce online privacy for teenagers, restrict internet access for migrants, and hinder algorithms designed to combat hate speech. However, these concerns seem exaggerated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A spokesperson from Meta side mentioned that parental consent should be for children who are under 16 to download apps but against state-specific laws. According to them different state laws would lead to inconsistent online experiences for teens and their parents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As Meta continues to collaborate with New York lawmakers, it's important to avoid quick fixes and instead focus on creating laws that genuinely empower parents and support teens online.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The current push by tech giants to influence legislation is crucial, especially given similar efforts in Australia. The South Australian government is also concerned about their children's safety. They plan to ban the social media platform for children under 14. For those children that are under 15 and 16 need their parents permission in order to use the social media apps. It is a commendable step to secure the privacy of youngsters. <\/p>\n\n\n\n It's also encouraging to see the federal government<\/a> moving forward with an age verification trial to prevent children from accessing content that is not good for them. The main aim of all of these measures is to make a safe online environment for children.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n Additionally, the creation of a new Parliamentary Select Committee to examine the impact of social media on Australian society is significant. This committee will investigate how algorithms and corporate decisions influence what we see online. This step promotes greater transparency and accountability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n So there is a legal battle between Elon Musk<\/a>\u2019s platform, X, and the Federal safety Commissioner. The main purpose of the battle is to block all violent videos that are harmful for children who are under 18. These Act are compulsory to provide an effective online environment and also to protect the online presence of children.\u00a0<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying against online safety bill: Tech companies spent $1.5m for this purpose","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-against-online-safety-bill-tech-companies-spent-1-5m-for-this-purpose","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7028","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":59},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
\n The whole Arab nation is with Palestine and finding ways in order to oppose the US. After the mid-May meeting of the Arab League meeting in Bahrain, they are encouraged for a worldwide conference to strongly show favoritism on a two-state solution. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Furthermore, in order to discuss Palestine issues, the Bahrain Declaration calls for an international conference. The aim of this conference is to establish an independent Palestine where Palestinians can live peacefully without any restriction of Israel. Also the agenda of the meeting is to end the Israeli occupation of all occupied Arab territories. All of this effort is based upon the international resolution for the sake of peace. <\/p>\n\n\n\n For more than two decades, Arab countries have increasingly supported the two-state solution for Israel and Palestine. The major step forward came in 2002 with the Arab Peace Initiative, though Israel rejected this offer and the US consistently supported Israel's stance. Following the Gaza War's outbreak in October, Arab and Islamic leaders reaffirmed the peace proposal at a meeting in Riyadh in November.<\/p>\n\n\n\n For more than two decades Arab countries have wanted peace for Palestine and have supported the two-state solution for Palestine and Israel. In 2002 the most crucial step came forward with the Arab Peace Initiatives. At the same time Israel strongly opposed this offer and the US stood with Israel\u2019s stance. Following the Gaza War's outbreak in October, Arab and Islamic leaders reaffirmed the peace proposal at a meeting in Riyadh in November.<\/p>\n\n\n\n After this the Arab leader's efforts for the establishment of a separate state for Plastine have gained momentum. On March 25, the United Nation Security Council called for an immediate ceasefire. Israel ignored it. On April 18, finally the UN Security Council supported the decision of Palestine membership in the UN. This decision is strongly opposed by the US and UK and Switzerland abstaining. <\/p>\n\n\n\n On May 10, the UN General Assembly strongly supported Palestine\u2019s bid for UN membership with a 143-9 vote. Many countries support this decision such as Norway, Spain, and Ireland clearly declared on May 22, to recognize a Palestinian state. At the same time the Irish Prime Minister also said that more countries would follow.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Due to diplomatic efforts and international law pressure the United State is becoming isolated. Furthermore, Israel got notification from the International Court of Justice to stop operations in Rafah. This is due to that Israel may be violating the 1948 Genocide Convention. Arrest Warrants are issued against the Israeli leaders and 3 Hamas leaders. The US may need to adjust its stance to avoid isolation, which threatens its security and national interests. It is important for the US to maintain its relationship with the Arab world. <\/p>\n\n\n\n In order to stop the two-state solution Israel started lobbying in the US. In America's corrupt political system, many political campaigns got the offer of money from Israel for the prevention of a two-state solution. However, lobbying has its limits. American public opinion is increasingly critical of Israel's oppressive policies and violence in Gaza.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Mainstream US media are now informing the public that, even before last October, Israel's justice system was used to oppress and displace Palestinians and carry out systematic violence. Social media highlights the daily destruction in Gaza, with Israeli soldiers sometimes boasting as they demolish universities, hospitals, or apartment buildings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The last gambit from the US in order to break Arab unity over Palestine by different offers. It includes advanced fighter planes, and a defense pact in exchange for normalizing relations with Israel. But this strategic effort of the US is likely to fail. Arab countries are still united in favor of Palestinian rights and peace in the region. If the Arab world sticks to its decision, then independent Palestine could soon be established. <\/p>\n","post_title":"The support of Arab world for Palestine to win the war of liberation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"the-support-of-arab-world-for-palestine-to-win-the-war-of-liberation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7034","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7028,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-05-22 11:39:55","post_date_gmt":"2024-05-22 11:39:55","post_content":"\n It is concerning that Meta and Google spend large amounts of money against bills<\/a> that are designed to save the online privacy of children. These major tech companies spent nearly $1.5 million. According to some recent reports, most of the different technology industries have poured\u00a0 $1.23 million into lobbying lawmakers in Albany, New York.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n The main purpose of the bill that they oppose is the safety of children's data. Its aim is to stop collecting and selling data especially for those children that are under 18. It is worrying to see such powerful companies prioritize their interests over the safety and privacy<\/a> of young users.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Two types of acts are expected for the future. One is the SAFE Act for Kids and the other is New York Child Data Protection Act. Both of these acts are important in order to save the children's online presence. These bills, which have bipartisan support, aim to stop the exploitation of kids through addictive online feeds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Well many tech companies are trying hard and hard to oppose the bill and to stop these bills from passing. They have been investing huge amounts of money on lobbying<\/a> campaigns. The purpose of this campaign is to\u00a0 block the legislation or weaken its impact. By mid-March, these tech firms and their allies had already spent over $1 million on lobbying efforts, as revealed by public disclosures.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n This is the clear indicator of how determined they are to keep their interests protected, even if it means opposing laws designed to safeguard children.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to the New York Post \u201cThis is an astonishing amount of money to be spent to kill two reasonable bills.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n One of the crucial step that protect the children online presence is the SAFE Act. According to this Act children see only those posts in social media platforms that their parents allow. This gives parents more control over what their children are exposed to on these platforms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Additionally, the bill empowers parents to set time limits on their kids' social media use and manage in-app notifications, helping to reduce screen time and distractions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The second Act is also important. This Act works to prevent the collection and selling data<\/a> of users under 18 without consent. The parent consent would be important especially for those children under 13. This law would help safeguard kids' privacy and keep their data secure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Tech companies oppose the law and argue that these Act could limit freedom of speech<\/a>. Furthermore, it can also\u00a0 reduce online privacy for teenagers, restrict internet access for migrants, and hinder algorithms designed to combat hate speech. However, these concerns seem exaggerated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A spokesperson from Meta side mentioned that parental consent should be for children who are under 16 to download apps but against state-specific laws. According to them different state laws would lead to inconsistent online experiences for teens and their parents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As Meta continues to collaborate with New York lawmakers, it's important to avoid quick fixes and instead focus on creating laws that genuinely empower parents and support teens online.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The current push by tech giants to influence legislation is crucial, especially given similar efforts in Australia. The South Australian government is also concerned about their children's safety. They plan to ban the social media platform for children under 14. For those children that are under 15 and 16 need their parents permission in order to use the social media apps. It is a commendable step to secure the privacy of youngsters. <\/p>\n\n\n\n It's also encouraging to see the federal government<\/a> moving forward with an age verification trial to prevent children from accessing content that is not good for them. The main aim of all of these measures is to make a safe online environment for children.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n Additionally, the creation of a new Parliamentary Select Committee to examine the impact of social media on Australian society is significant. This committee will investigate how algorithms and corporate decisions influence what we see online. This step promotes greater transparency and accountability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n So there is a legal battle between Elon Musk<\/a>\u2019s platform, X, and the Federal safety Commissioner. The main purpose of the battle is to block all violent videos that are harmful for children who are under 18. These Act are compulsory to provide an effective online environment and also to protect the online presence of children.\u00a0<\/p>\n","post_title":"Lobbying against online safety bill: Tech companies spent $1.5m for this purpose","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"lobbying-against-online-safety-bill-tech-companies-spent-1-5m-for-this-purpose","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7028","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":59},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};
\n When the United States came to know about the two-state solution, it has been blocking it in practice. The US is the only country that used its veto power in order to oppose the decision of the United Nations. Additionally Israel truly relies on the US, that it prevents the establishment of free Palestine. Nevertheless, this obstacle can still be overcome.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The whole Arab nation is with Palestine and finding ways in order to oppose the US. After the mid-May meeting of the Arab League meeting in Bahrain, they are encouraged for a worldwide conference to strongly show favoritism on a two-state solution. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Furthermore, in order to discuss Palestine issues, the Bahrain Declaration calls for an international conference. The aim of this conference is to establish an independent Palestine where Palestinians can live peacefully without any restriction of Israel. Also the agenda of the meeting is to end the Israeli occupation of all occupied Arab territories. All of this effort is based upon the international resolution for the sake of peace. <\/p>\n\n\n\n For more than two decades, Arab countries have increasingly supported the two-state solution for Israel and Palestine. The major step forward came in 2002 with the Arab Peace Initiative, though Israel rejected this offer and the US consistently supported Israel's stance. Following the Gaza War's outbreak in October, Arab and Islamic leaders reaffirmed the peace proposal at a meeting in Riyadh in November.<\/p>\n\n\n\n For more than two decades Arab countries have wanted peace for Palestine and have supported the two-state solution for Palestine and Israel. In 2002 the most crucial step came forward with the Arab Peace Initiatives. At the same time Israel strongly opposed this offer and the US stood with Israel\u2019s stance. Following the Gaza War's outbreak in October, Arab and Islamic leaders reaffirmed the peace proposal at a meeting in Riyadh in November.<\/p>\n\n\n\n After this the Arab leader's efforts for the establishment of a separate state for Plastine have gained momentum. On March 25, the United Nation Security Council called for an immediate ceasefire. Israel ignored it. On April 18, finally the UN Security Council supported the decision of Palestine membership in the UN. This decision is strongly opposed by the US and UK and Switzerland abstaining. <\/p>\n\n\n\n On May 10, the UN General Assembly strongly supported Palestine\u2019s bid for UN membership with a 143-9 vote. Many countries support this decision such as Norway, Spain, and Ireland clearly declared on May 22, to recognize a Palestinian state. At the same time the Irish Prime Minister also said that more countries would follow.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Due to diplomatic efforts and international law pressure the United State is becoming isolated. Furthermore, Israel got notification from the International Court of Justice to stop operations in Rafah. This is due to that Israel may be violating the 1948 Genocide Convention. Arrest Warrants are issued against the Israeli leaders and 3 Hamas leaders. The US may need to adjust its stance to avoid isolation, which threatens its security and national interests. It is important for the US to maintain its relationship with the Arab world. <\/p>\n\n\n\n In order to stop the two-state solution Israel started lobbying in the US. In America's corrupt political system, many political campaigns got the offer of money from Israel for the prevention of a two-state solution. However, lobbying has its limits. American public opinion is increasingly critical of Israel's oppressive policies and violence in Gaza.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Mainstream US media are now informing the public that, even before last October, Israel's justice system was used to oppress and displace Palestinians and carry out systematic violence. Social media highlights the daily destruction in Gaza, with Israeli soldiers sometimes boasting as they demolish universities, hospitals, or apartment buildings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The last gambit from the US in order to break Arab unity over Palestine by different offers. It includes advanced fighter planes, and a defense pact in exchange for normalizing relations with Israel. But this strategic effort of the US is likely to fail. Arab countries are still united in favor of Palestinian rights and peace in the region. If the Arab world sticks to its decision, then independent Palestine could soon be established. <\/p>\n","post_title":"The support of Arab world for Palestine to win the war of liberation","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"the-support-of-arab-world-for-palestine-to-win-the-war-of-liberation","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:27","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=7034","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":7028,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-05-22 11:39:55","post_date_gmt":"2024-05-22 11:39:55","post_content":"\n It is concerning that Meta and Google spend large amounts of money against bills<\/a> that are designed to save the online privacy of children. These major tech companies spent nearly $1.5 million. According to some recent reports, most of the different technology industries have poured\u00a0 $1.23 million into lobbying lawmakers in Albany, New York.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n The main purpose of the bill that they oppose is the safety of children's data. Its aim is to stop collecting and selling data especially for those children that are under 18. It is worrying to see such powerful companies prioritize their interests over the safety and privacy<\/a> of young users.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Two types of acts are expected for the future. One is the SAFE Act for Kids and the other is New York Child Data Protection Act. Both of these acts are important in order to save the children's online presence. These bills, which have bipartisan support, aim to stop the exploitation of kids through addictive online feeds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Well many tech companies are trying hard and hard to oppose the bill and to stop these bills from passing. They have been investing huge amounts of money on lobbying<\/a> campaigns. The purpose of this campaign is to\u00a0 block the legislation or weaken its impact. By mid-March, these tech firms and their allies had already spent over $1 million on lobbying efforts, as revealed by public disclosures.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n This is the clear indicator of how determined they are to keep their interests protected, even if it means opposing laws designed to safeguard children.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to the New York Post \u201cThis is an astonishing amount of money to be spent to kill two reasonable bills.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n One of the crucial step that protect the children online presence is the SAFE Act. According to this Act children see only those posts in social media platforms that their parents allow. This gives parents more control over what their children are exposed to on these platforms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Additionally, the bill empowers parents to set time limits on their kids' social media use and manage in-app notifications, helping to reduce screen time and distractions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The second Act is also important. This Act works to prevent the collection and