\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

That tactic may have its roots in the Compact of Free Association (Cofa), an agreement<\/a> that has guided US relations with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau for many years. First signed in 1986, the Cofa accord provides financial help and a legal framework<\/a> allowing its residents to live, work, and attend school in the United States in exchange for the US military having access to the land, air, and sea of the three Pacific island<\/a> nations. While Palau's Cofa program is scheduled to expire in September, that of the Marshall Islands and Micronesia expired on September 30. Last year, new agreements were established and extended, and Biden promised the three nations US$7.1 billion<\/a> spread over 20 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

The agreement is viewed as critical to Washington's efforts to sustain<\/a> its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken once declared that \"our planet's future will be written,\" despite growing concerns<\/a> about what some have called Beijing's coercive influence campaign.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That tactic may have its roots in the Compact of Free Association (Cofa), an agreement<\/a> that has guided US relations with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau for many years. First signed in 1986, the Cofa accord provides financial help and a legal framework<\/a> allowing its residents to live, work, and attend school in the United States in exchange for the US military having access to the land, air, and sea of the three Pacific island<\/a> nations. While Palau's Cofa program is scheduled to expire in September, that of the Marshall Islands and Micronesia expired on September 30. Last year, new agreements were established and extended, and Biden promised the three nations US$7.1 billion<\/a> spread over 20 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Navigating a Strategic Landscape<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The agreement is viewed as critical to Washington's efforts to sustain<\/a> its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken once declared that \"our planet's future will be written,\" despite growing concerns<\/a> about what some have called Beijing's coercive influence campaign.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That tactic may have its roots in the Compact of Free Association (Cofa), an agreement<\/a> that has guided US relations with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau for many years. First signed in 1986, the Cofa accord provides financial help and a legal framework<\/a> allowing its residents to live, work, and attend school in the United States in exchange for the US military having access to the land, air, and sea of the three Pacific island<\/a> nations. While Palau's Cofa program is scheduled to expire in September, that of the Marshall Islands and Micronesia expired on September 30. Last year, new agreements were established and extended, and Biden promised the three nations US$7.1 billion<\/a> spread over 20 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

The Biden administration<\/a> remained dedicated to its alliances in the strategically significant Indo-Pacific area, one day after a US$95 billion <\/a>foreign assistance package omitted economic help pledged for the region as the US strives to counter China's influence there. We at the White House<\/a> and State Department are still in favor of funding authorization and appropriation. Deputy assistant secretary Camille Dawson of the US State Department stated, \"We feel it's critically important to continue working in close concert and in support of the freely associated states<\/a>,\" referring to the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau. Dawson said this in answer to a query from the Post at a press conference on the second anniversary of US President Joe Biden's Indo-Pacific Strategy announcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Navigating a Strategic Landscape<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The agreement is viewed as critical to Washington's efforts to sustain<\/a> its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken once declared that \"our planet's future will be written,\" despite growing concerns<\/a> about what some have called Beijing's coercive influence campaign.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That tactic may have its roots in the Compact of Free Association (Cofa), an agreement<\/a> that has guided US relations with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau for many years. First signed in 1986, the Cofa accord provides financial help and a legal framework<\/a> allowing its residents to live, work, and attend school in the United States in exchange for the US military having access to the land, air, and sea of the three Pacific island<\/a> nations. While Palau's Cofa program is scheduled to expire in September, that of the Marshall Islands and Micronesia expired on September 30. Last year, new agreements were established and extended, and Biden promised the three nations US$7.1 billion<\/a> spread over 20 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

In conclusion, Internal medicine specialist Dr. Rachel Charles, who also has lupus, talked about the rigorous treatment plan she had to follow in order to do IVF and get ready for an embryo transfer. Rather than move on with an embryo transfer, she made the decision in February to take a break from the daily hormone injections. In a previous interview, Rebecca Mathews, 36, who is the mother of two IVF-conceived children, told The 19th that she was shocked and angry at the same time when she learned of the decision. She still has a frozen embryo and is unsure of what to do with it.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating legal turmoil: IVF company registers to lobby Washington","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-legal-turmoil-ivf-company-registers-to-lobby-washington","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6902","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6871,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_date_gmt":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_content":"\n

The Biden administration<\/a> remained dedicated to its alliances in the strategically significant Indo-Pacific area, one day after a US$95 billion <\/a>foreign assistance package omitted economic help pledged for the region as the US strives to counter China's influence there. We at the White House<\/a> and State Department are still in favor of funding authorization and appropriation. Deputy assistant secretary Camille Dawson of the US State Department stated, \"We feel it's critically important to continue working in close concert and in support of the freely associated states<\/a>,\" referring to the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau. Dawson said this in answer to a query from the Post at a press conference on the second anniversary of US President Joe Biden's Indo-Pacific Strategy announcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Navigating a Strategic Landscape<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The agreement is viewed as critical to Washington's efforts to sustain<\/a> its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken once declared that \"our planet's future will be written,\" despite growing concerns<\/a> about what some have called Beijing's coercive influence campaign.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That tactic may have its roots in the Compact of Free Association (Cofa), an agreement<\/a> that has guided US relations with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau for many years. First signed in 1986, the Cofa accord provides financial help and a legal framework<\/a> allowing its residents to live, work, and attend school in the United States in exchange for the US military having access to the land, air, and sea of the three Pacific island<\/a> nations. While Palau's Cofa program is scheduled to expire in September, that of the Marshall Islands and Micronesia expired on September 30. Last year, new agreements were established and extended, and Biden promised the three nations US$7.1 billion<\/a> spread over 20 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Every woman present at the discussion discussed the intense psychological stress and loneliness associated with receiving reproductive therapy. The epidemic had already caused some of them to have their reproductive treatments interrupted, only for the Supreme Court's ruling to throw them off course once again. According to fertility patient and nurse practitioner Kendall Diebold, \"the IVF world as a whole is so isolating and lonely.\" \"And all of that has really been taken by this, and it has just been magnified and filled with sadness, grief, and anger.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Internal medicine specialist Dr. Rachel Charles, who also has lupus, talked about the rigorous treatment plan she had to follow in order to do IVF and get ready for an embryo transfer. Rather than move on with an embryo transfer, she made the decision in February to take a break from the daily hormone injections. In a previous interview, Rebecca Mathews, 36, who is the mother of two IVF-conceived children, told The 19th that she was shocked and angry at the same time when she learned of the decision. She still has a frozen embryo and is unsure of what to do with it.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating legal turmoil: IVF company registers to lobby Washington","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-legal-turmoil-ivf-company-registers-to-lobby-washington","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6902","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6871,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_date_gmt":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_content":"\n

The Biden administration<\/a> remained dedicated to its alliances in the strategically significant Indo-Pacific area, one day after a US$95 billion <\/a>foreign assistance package omitted economic help pledged for the region as the US strives to counter China's influence there. We at the White House<\/a> and State Department are still in favor of funding authorization and appropriation. Deputy assistant secretary Camille Dawson of the US State Department stated, \"We feel it's critically important to continue working in close concert and in support of the freely associated states<\/a>,\" referring to the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau. Dawson said this in answer to a query from the Post at a press conference on the second anniversary of US President Joe Biden's Indo-Pacific Strategy announcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Navigating a Strategic Landscape<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The agreement is viewed as critical to Washington's efforts to sustain<\/a> its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken once declared that \"our planet's future will be written,\" despite growing concerns<\/a> about what some have called Beijing's coercive influence campaign.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That tactic may have its roots in the Compact of Free Association (Cofa), an agreement<\/a> that has guided US relations with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau for many years. First signed in 1986, the Cofa accord provides financial help and a legal framework<\/a> allowing its residents to live, work, and attend school in the United States in exchange for the US military having access to the land, air, and sea of the three Pacific island<\/a> nations. While Palau's Cofa program is scheduled to expire in September, that of the Marshall Islands and Micronesia expired on September 30. Last year, new agreements were established and extended, and Biden promised the three nations US$7.1 billion<\/a> spread over 20 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Balancing profit and patient welfare<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Every woman present at the discussion discussed the intense psychological stress and loneliness associated with receiving reproductive therapy. The epidemic had already caused some of them to have their reproductive treatments interrupted, only for the Supreme Court's ruling to throw them off course once again. According to fertility patient and nurse practitioner Kendall Diebold, \"the IVF world as a whole is so isolating and lonely.\" \"And all of that has really been taken by this, and it has just been magnified and filled with sadness, grief, and anger.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Internal medicine specialist Dr. Rachel Charles, who also has lupus, talked about the rigorous treatment plan she had to follow in order to do IVF and get ready for an embryo transfer. Rather than move on with an embryo transfer, she made the decision in February to take a break from the daily hormone injections. In a previous interview, Rebecca Mathews, 36, who is the mother of two IVF-conceived children, told The 19th that she was shocked and angry at the same time when she learned of the decision. She still has a frozen embryo and is unsure of what to do with it.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating legal turmoil: IVF company registers to lobby Washington","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-legal-turmoil-ivf-company-registers-to-lobby-washington","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6902","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6871,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_date_gmt":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_content":"\n

The Biden administration<\/a> remained dedicated to its alliances in the strategically significant Indo-Pacific area, one day after a US$95 billion <\/a>foreign assistance package omitted economic help pledged for the region as the US strives to counter China's influence there. We at the White House<\/a> and State Department are still in favor of funding authorization and appropriation. Deputy assistant secretary Camille Dawson of the US State Department stated, \"We feel it's critically important to continue working in close concert and in support of the freely associated states<\/a>,\" referring to the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau. Dawson said this in answer to a query from the Post at a press conference on the second anniversary of US President Joe Biden's Indo-Pacific Strategy announcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Navigating a Strategic Landscape<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The agreement is viewed as critical to Washington's efforts to sustain<\/a> its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken once declared that \"our planet's future will be written,\" despite growing concerns<\/a> about what some have called Beijing's coercive influence campaign.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That tactic may have its roots in the Compact of Free Association (Cofa), an agreement<\/a> that has guided US relations with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau for many years. First signed in 1986, the Cofa accord provides financial help and a legal framework<\/a> allowing its residents to live, work, and attend school in the United States in exchange for the US military having access to the land, air, and sea of the three Pacific island<\/a> nations. While Palau's Cofa program is scheduled to expire in September, that of the Marshall Islands and Micronesia expired on September 30. Last year, new agreements were established and extended, and Biden promised the three nations US$7.1 billion<\/a> spread over 20 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

In a similar vein, GenBioPro, a different reproductive health care firm, which manufactures mifepristone generically, approached Washington following a siege of their product. In 2022, a lobbying firm filed to represent the company, and the following year, GenBioPro filed a lawsuit against the FDA to maintain the drug's availability. CooperSurgical, a Connecticut-based corporation, recruited three seasoned Hill staffers, one of which was Jessie Brairton, a former Eli Lilly lobbyist and staff member of Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas). The other two lobbyists are Jacky Usyk, a veteran Democratic Senate assistant, and Andrew Rosenberg, a former aide to Sen. Ed Kennedy (D-Mass.), who co-founded the company. Federal filings state that CooperSurgical has not previously registered to lobby. Beasley met with Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra on Tuesday to talk about the turmoil and uncertainty caused by the Alabama Supreme Court decision that threatens IVF, as well as other individuals impacted by the decision. It caused many people's reproductive treatments to come to an abrupt halt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Balancing profit and patient welfare<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Every woman present at the discussion discussed the intense psychological stress and loneliness associated with receiving reproductive therapy. The epidemic had already caused some of them to have their reproductive treatments interrupted, only for the Supreme Court's ruling to throw them off course once again. According to fertility patient and nurse practitioner Kendall Diebold, \"the IVF world as a whole is so isolating and lonely.\" \"And all of that has really been taken by this, and it has just been magnified and filled with sadness, grief, and anger.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Internal medicine specialist Dr. Rachel Charles, who also has lupus, talked about the rigorous treatment plan she had to follow in order to do IVF and get ready for an embryo transfer. Rather than move on with an embryo transfer, she made the decision in February to take a break from the daily hormone injections. In a previous interview, Rebecca Mathews, 36, who is the mother of two IVF-conceived children, told The 19th that she was shocked and angry at the same time when she learned of the decision. She still has a frozen embryo and is unsure of what to do with it.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating legal turmoil: IVF company registers to lobby Washington","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-legal-turmoil-ivf-company-registers-to-lobby-washington","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6902","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6871,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_date_gmt":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_content":"\n

The Biden administration<\/a> remained dedicated to its alliances in the strategically significant Indo-Pacific area, one day after a US$95 billion <\/a>foreign assistance package omitted economic help pledged for the region as the US strives to counter China's influence there. We at the White House<\/a> and State Department are still in favor of funding authorization and appropriation. Deputy assistant secretary Camille Dawson of the US State Department stated, \"We feel it's critically important to continue working in close concert and in support of the freely associated states<\/a>,\" referring to the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau. Dawson said this in answer to a query from the Post at a press conference on the second anniversary of US President Joe Biden's Indo-Pacific Strategy announcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Navigating a Strategic Landscape<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The agreement is viewed as critical to Washington's efforts to sustain<\/a> its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken once declared that \"our planet's future will be written,\" despite growing concerns<\/a> about what some have called Beijing's coercive influence campaign.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That tactic may have its roots in the Compact of Free Association (Cofa), an agreement<\/a> that has guided US relations with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau for many years. First signed in 1986, the Cofa accord provides financial help and a legal framework<\/a> allowing its residents to live, work, and attend school in the United States in exchange for the US military having access to the land, air, and sea of the three Pacific island<\/a> nations. While Palau's Cofa program is scheduled to expire in September, that of the Marshall Islands and Micronesia expired on September 30. Last year, new agreements were established and extended, and Biden promised the three nations US$7.1 billion<\/a> spread over 20 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

The role of lobbying in reproductive technology<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In a similar vein, GenBioPro, a different reproductive health care firm, which manufactures mifepristone generically, approached Washington following a siege of their product. In 2022, a lobbying firm filed to represent the company, and the following year, GenBioPro filed a lawsuit against the FDA to maintain the drug's availability. CooperSurgical, a Connecticut-based corporation, recruited three seasoned Hill staffers, one of which was Jessie Brairton, a former Eli Lilly lobbyist and staff member of Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas). The other two lobbyists are Jacky Usyk, a veteran Democratic Senate assistant, and Andrew Rosenberg, a former aide to Sen. Ed Kennedy (D-Mass.), who co-founded the company. Federal filings state that CooperSurgical has not previously registered to lobby. Beasley met with Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra on Tuesday to talk about the turmoil and uncertainty caused by the Alabama Supreme Court decision that threatens IVF, as well as other individuals impacted by the decision. It caused many people's reproductive treatments to come to an abrupt halt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Balancing profit and patient welfare<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Every woman present at the discussion discussed the intense psychological stress and loneliness associated with receiving reproductive therapy. The epidemic had already caused some of them to have their reproductive treatments interrupted, only for the Supreme Court's ruling to throw them off course once again. According to fertility patient and nurse practitioner Kendall Diebold, \"the IVF world as a whole is so isolating and lonely.\" \"And all of that has really been taken by this, and it has just been magnified and filled with sadness, grief, and anger.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Internal medicine specialist Dr. Rachel Charles, who also has lupus, talked about the rigorous treatment plan she had to follow in order to do IVF and get ready for an embryo transfer. Rather than move on with an embryo transfer, she made the decision in February to take a break from the daily hormone injections. In a previous interview, Rebecca Mathews, 36, who is the mother of two IVF-conceived children, told The 19th that she was shocked and angry at the same time when she learned of the decision. She still has a frozen embryo and is unsure of what to do with it.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating legal turmoil: IVF company registers to lobby Washington","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-legal-turmoil-ivf-company-registers-to-lobby-washington","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6902","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6871,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_date_gmt":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_content":"\n

The Biden administration<\/a> remained dedicated to its alliances in the strategically significant Indo-Pacific area, one day after a US$95 billion <\/a>foreign assistance package omitted economic help pledged for the region as the US strives to counter China's influence there. We at the White House<\/a> and State Department are still in favor of funding authorization and appropriation. Deputy assistant secretary Camille Dawson of the US State Department stated, \"We feel it's critically important to continue working in close concert and in support of the freely associated states<\/a>,\" referring to the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau. Dawson said this in answer to a query from the Post at a press conference on the second anniversary of US President Joe Biden's Indo-Pacific Strategy announcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Navigating a Strategic Landscape<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The agreement is viewed as critical to Washington's efforts to sustain<\/a> its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken once declared that \"our planet's future will be written,\" despite growing concerns<\/a> about what some have called Beijing's coercive influence campaign.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That tactic may have its roots in the Compact of Free Association (Cofa), an agreement<\/a> that has guided US relations with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau for many years. First signed in 1986, the Cofa accord provides financial help and a legal framework<\/a> allowing its residents to live, work, and attend school in the United States in exchange for the US military having access to the land, air, and sea of the three Pacific island<\/a> nations. While Palau's Cofa program is scheduled to expire in September, that of the Marshall Islands and Micronesia expired on September 30. Last year, new agreements were established and extended, and Biden promised the three nations US$7.1 billion<\/a> spread over 20 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Families alleging CooperSurgical caused the loss of their embryos are suing the corporation for undisclosed damages in many jurisdictions over identical allegations. CooperSurgical representative Adeena Fried responded, \"The company wanted to see that IVF remains accessible nationwide,\" when questioned about the choice to lobby. \"Our goal is to guarantee that the greatest goods and innovations can be utilized in Alabama and throughout the country to strengthen families and welcome new members into the world,\" the spokesperson stated. \"As of right now, a lot of clinics in Alabama are closed, and legislation nationwide needs to support the entire fertility industry.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The role of lobbying in reproductive technology<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In a similar vein, GenBioPro, a different reproductive health care firm, which manufactures mifepristone generically, approached Washington following a siege of their product. In 2022, a lobbying firm filed to represent the company, and the following year, GenBioPro filed a lawsuit against the FDA to maintain the drug's availability. CooperSurgical, a Connecticut-based corporation, recruited three seasoned Hill staffers, one of which was Jessie Brairton, a former Eli Lilly lobbyist and staff member of Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas). The other two lobbyists are Jacky Usyk, a veteran Democratic Senate assistant, and Andrew Rosenberg, a former aide to Sen. Ed Kennedy (D-Mass.), who co-founded the company. Federal filings state that CooperSurgical has not previously registered to lobby. Beasley met with Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra on Tuesday to talk about the turmoil and uncertainty caused by the Alabama Supreme Court decision that threatens IVF, as well as other individuals impacted by the decision. It caused many people's reproductive treatments to come to an abrupt halt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Balancing profit and patient welfare<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Every woman present at the discussion discussed the intense psychological stress and loneliness associated with receiving reproductive therapy. The epidemic had already caused some of them to have their reproductive treatments interrupted, only for the Supreme Court's ruling to throw them off course once again. According to fertility patient and nurse practitioner Kendall Diebold, \"the IVF world as a whole is so isolating and lonely.\" \"And all of that has really been taken by this, and it has just been magnified and filled with sadness, grief, and anger.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Internal medicine specialist Dr. Rachel Charles, who also has lupus, talked about the rigorous treatment plan she had to follow in order to do IVF and get ready for an embryo transfer. Rather than move on with an embryo transfer, she made the decision in February to take a break from the daily hormone injections. In a previous interview, Rebecca Mathews, 36, who is the mother of two IVF-conceived children, told The 19th that she was shocked and angry at the same time when she learned of the decision. She still has a frozen embryo and is unsure of what to do with it.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating legal turmoil: IVF company registers to lobby Washington","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-legal-turmoil-ivf-company-registers-to-lobby-washington","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6902","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6871,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_date_gmt":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_content":"\n

The Biden administration<\/a> remained dedicated to its alliances in the strategically significant Indo-Pacific area, one day after a US$95 billion <\/a>foreign assistance package omitted economic help pledged for the region as the US strives to counter China's influence there. We at the White House<\/a> and State Department are still in favor of funding authorization and appropriation. Deputy assistant secretary Camille Dawson of the US State Department stated, \"We feel it's critically important to continue working in close concert and in support of the freely associated states<\/a>,\" referring to the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau. Dawson said this in answer to a query from the Post at a press conference on the second anniversary of US President Joe Biden's Indo-Pacific Strategy announcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Navigating a Strategic Landscape<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The agreement is viewed as critical to Washington's efforts to sustain<\/a> its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken once declared that \"our planet's future will be written,\" despite growing concerns<\/a> about what some have called Beijing's coercive influence campaign.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That tactic may have its roots in the Compact of Free Association (Cofa), an agreement<\/a> that has guided US relations with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau for many years. First signed in 1986, the Cofa accord provides financial help and a legal framework<\/a> allowing its residents to live, work, and attend school in the United States in exchange for the US military having access to the land, air, and sea of the three Pacific island<\/a> nations. While Palau's Cofa program is scheduled to expire in September, that of the Marshall Islands and Micronesia expired on September 30. Last year, new agreements were established and extended, and Biden promised the three nations US$7.1 billion<\/a> spread over 20 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Thorn Run Partners, a Washington-based company licensed to effectively advocate on \"Fertility\" and \"Maternal Health,\" was engaged by CooperSurgical. This week, lawmakers in Alabama's Republican-controlled legislature passed a bill to safeguard IVF procedures. However, conservatives swiftly prevented the Senate from adopting the first federal policy. The Alabama Wrongful Death of a Minor Act made the destruction of embryos illegal, according to the court's ruling in that state's case. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Families alleging CooperSurgical caused the loss of their embryos are suing the corporation for undisclosed damages in many jurisdictions over identical allegations. CooperSurgical representative Adeena Fried responded, \"The company wanted to see that IVF remains accessible nationwide,\" when questioned about the choice to lobby. \"Our goal is to guarantee that the greatest goods and innovations can be utilized in Alabama and throughout the country to strengthen families and welcome new members into the world,\" the spokesperson stated. \"As of right now, a lot of clinics in Alabama are closed, and legislation nationwide needs to support the entire fertility industry.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The role of lobbying in reproductive technology<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In a similar vein, GenBioPro, a different reproductive health care firm, which manufactures mifepristone generically, approached Washington following a siege of their product. In 2022, a lobbying firm filed to represent the company, and the following year, GenBioPro filed a lawsuit against the FDA to maintain the drug's availability. CooperSurgical, a Connecticut-based corporation, recruited three seasoned Hill staffers, one of which was Jessie Brairton, a former Eli Lilly lobbyist and staff member of Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas). The other two lobbyists are Jacky Usyk, a veteran Democratic Senate assistant, and Andrew Rosenberg, a former aide to Sen. Ed Kennedy (D-Mass.), who co-founded the company. Federal filings state that CooperSurgical has not previously registered to lobby. Beasley met with Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra on Tuesday to talk about the turmoil and uncertainty caused by the Alabama Supreme Court decision that threatens IVF, as well as other individuals impacted by the decision. It caused many people's reproductive treatments to come to an abrupt halt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Balancing profit and patient welfare<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Every woman present at the discussion discussed the intense psychological stress and loneliness associated with receiving reproductive therapy. The epidemic had already caused some of them to have their reproductive treatments interrupted, only for the Supreme Court's ruling to throw them off course once again. According to fertility patient and nurse practitioner Kendall Diebold, \"the IVF world as a whole is so isolating and lonely.\" \"And all of that has really been taken by this, and it has just been magnified and filled with sadness, grief, and anger.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Internal medicine specialist Dr. Rachel Charles, who also has lupus, talked about the rigorous treatment plan she had to follow in order to do IVF and get ready for an embryo transfer. Rather than move on with an embryo transfer, she made the decision in February to take a break from the daily hormone injections. In a previous interview, Rebecca Mathews, 36, who is the mother of two IVF-conceived children, told The 19th that she was shocked and angry at the same time when she learned of the decision. She still has a frozen embryo and is unsure of what to do with it.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating legal turmoil: IVF company registers to lobby Washington","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-legal-turmoil-ivf-company-registers-to-lobby-washington","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6902","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6871,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_date_gmt":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_content":"\n

The Biden administration<\/a> remained dedicated to its alliances in the strategically significant Indo-Pacific area, one day after a US$95 billion <\/a>foreign assistance package omitted economic help pledged for the region as the US strives to counter China's influence there. We at the White House<\/a> and State Department are still in favor of funding authorization and appropriation. Deputy assistant secretary Camille Dawson of the US State Department stated, \"We feel it's critically important to continue working in close concert and in support of the freely associated states<\/a>,\" referring to the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau. Dawson said this in answer to a query from the Post at a press conference on the second anniversary of US President Joe Biden's Indo-Pacific Strategy announcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Navigating a Strategic Landscape<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The agreement is viewed as critical to Washington's efforts to sustain<\/a> its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken once declared that \"our planet's future will be written,\" despite growing concerns<\/a> about what some have called Beijing's coercive influence campaign.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That tactic may have its roots in the Compact of Free Association (Cofa), an agreement<\/a> that has guided US relations with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau for many years. First signed in 1986, the Cofa accord provides financial help and a legal framework<\/a> allowing its residents to live, work, and attend school in the United States in exchange for the US military having access to the land, air, and sea of the three Pacific island<\/a> nations. While Palau's Cofa program is scheduled to expire in September, that of the Marshall Islands and Micronesia expired on September 30. Last year, new agreements were established and extended, and Biden promised the three nations US$7.1 billion<\/a> spread over 20 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Lobbying in Washington<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Thorn Run Partners, a Washington-based company licensed to effectively advocate on \"Fertility\" and \"Maternal Health,\" was engaged by CooperSurgical. This week, lawmakers in Alabama's Republican-controlled legislature passed a bill to safeguard IVF procedures. However, conservatives swiftly prevented the Senate from adopting the first federal policy. The Alabama Wrongful Death of a Minor Act made the destruction of embryos illegal, according to the court's ruling in that state's case. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Families alleging CooperSurgical caused the loss of their embryos are suing the corporation for undisclosed damages in many jurisdictions over identical allegations. CooperSurgical representative Adeena Fried responded, \"The company wanted to see that IVF remains accessible nationwide,\" when questioned about the choice to lobby. \"Our goal is to guarantee that the greatest goods and innovations can be utilized in Alabama and throughout the country to strengthen families and welcome new members into the world,\" the spokesperson stated. \"As of right now, a lot of clinics in Alabama are closed, and legislation nationwide needs to support the entire fertility industry.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The role of lobbying in reproductive technology<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In a similar vein, GenBioPro, a different reproductive health care firm, which manufactures mifepristone generically, approached Washington following a siege of their product. In 2022, a lobbying firm filed to represent the company, and the following year, GenBioPro filed a lawsuit against the FDA to maintain the drug's availability. CooperSurgical, a Connecticut-based corporation, recruited three seasoned Hill staffers, one of which was Jessie Brairton, a former Eli Lilly lobbyist and staff member of Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas). The other two lobbyists are Jacky Usyk, a veteran Democratic Senate assistant, and Andrew Rosenberg, a former aide to Sen. Ed Kennedy (D-Mass.), who co-founded the company. Federal filings state that CooperSurgical has not previously registered to lobby. Beasley met with Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra on Tuesday to talk about the turmoil and uncertainty caused by the Alabama Supreme Court decision that threatens IVF, as well as other individuals impacted by the decision. It caused many people's reproductive treatments to come to an abrupt halt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Balancing profit and patient welfare<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Every woman present at the discussion discussed the intense psychological stress and loneliness associated with receiving reproductive therapy. The epidemic had already caused some of them to have their reproductive treatments interrupted, only for the Supreme Court's ruling to throw them off course once again. According to fertility patient and nurse practitioner Kendall Diebold, \"the IVF world as a whole is so isolating and lonely.\" \"And all of that has really been taken by this, and it has just been magnified and filled with sadness, grief, and anger.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Internal medicine specialist Dr. Rachel Charles, who also has lupus, talked about the rigorous treatment plan she had to follow in order to do IVF and get ready for an embryo transfer. Rather than move on with an embryo transfer, she made the decision in February to take a break from the daily hormone injections. In a previous interview, Rebecca Mathews, 36, who is the mother of two IVF-conceived children, told The 19th that she was shocked and angry at the same time when she learned of the decision. She still has a frozen embryo and is unsure of what to do with it.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating legal turmoil: IVF company registers to lobby Washington","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-legal-turmoil-ivf-company-registers-to-lobby-washington","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6902","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6871,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_date_gmt":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_content":"\n

The Biden administration<\/a> remained dedicated to its alliances in the strategically significant Indo-Pacific area, one day after a US$95 billion <\/a>foreign assistance package omitted economic help pledged for the region as the US strives to counter China's influence there. We at the White House<\/a> and State Department are still in favor of funding authorization and appropriation. Deputy assistant secretary Camille Dawson of the US State Department stated, \"We feel it's critically important to continue working in close concert and in support of the freely associated states<\/a>,\" referring to the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau. Dawson said this in answer to a query from the Post at a press conference on the second anniversary of US President Joe Biden's Indo-Pacific Strategy announcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Navigating a Strategic Landscape<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The agreement is viewed as critical to Washington's efforts to sustain<\/a> its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken once declared that \"our planet's future will be written,\" despite growing concerns<\/a> about what some have called Beijing's coercive influence campaign.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That tactic may have its roots in the Compact of Free Association (Cofa), an agreement<\/a> that has guided US relations with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau for many years. First signed in 1986, the Cofa accord provides financial help and a legal framework<\/a> allowing its residents to live, work, and attend school in the United States in exchange for the US military having access to the land, air, and sea of the three Pacific island<\/a> nations. While Palau's Cofa program is scheduled to expire in September, that of the Marshall Islands and Micronesia expired on September 30. Last year, new agreements were established and extended, and Biden promised the three nations US$7.1 billion<\/a> spread over 20 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

The Alabama Supreme Court's decision last month that frozen embryos were lawfully regarded infants sparked fresh requests for federal safeguards for reproductive therapies, which led to the IVF business CooperSurgical filing. The decision, which caused some clinics in Alabama to stop IVF procedures, has set up a nationwide IVF firestorm. As the election draws near, Democrats are hammering Republicans on the matter, while the GOP is rushing to take positions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbying in Washington<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Thorn Run Partners, a Washington-based company licensed to effectively advocate on \"Fertility\" and \"Maternal Health,\" was engaged by CooperSurgical. This week, lawmakers in Alabama's Republican-controlled legislature passed a bill to safeguard IVF procedures. However, conservatives swiftly prevented the Senate from adopting the first federal policy. The Alabama Wrongful Death of a Minor Act made the destruction of embryos illegal, according to the court's ruling in that state's case. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Families alleging CooperSurgical caused the loss of their embryos are suing the corporation for undisclosed damages in many jurisdictions over identical allegations. CooperSurgical representative Adeena Fried responded, \"The company wanted to see that IVF remains accessible nationwide,\" when questioned about the choice to lobby. \"Our goal is to guarantee that the greatest goods and innovations can be utilized in Alabama and throughout the country to strengthen families and welcome new members into the world,\" the spokesperson stated. \"As of right now, a lot of clinics in Alabama are closed, and legislation nationwide needs to support the entire fertility industry.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The role of lobbying in reproductive technology<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In a similar vein, GenBioPro, a different reproductive health care firm, which manufactures mifepristone generically, approached Washington following a siege of their product. In 2022, a lobbying firm filed to represent the company, and the following year, GenBioPro filed a lawsuit against the FDA to maintain the drug's availability. CooperSurgical, a Connecticut-based corporation, recruited three seasoned Hill staffers, one of which was Jessie Brairton, a former Eli Lilly lobbyist and staff member of Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas). The other two lobbyists are Jacky Usyk, a veteran Democratic Senate assistant, and Andrew Rosenberg, a former aide to Sen. Ed Kennedy (D-Mass.), who co-founded the company. Federal filings state that CooperSurgical has not previously registered to lobby. Beasley met with Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra on Tuesday to talk about the turmoil and uncertainty caused by the Alabama Supreme Court decision that threatens IVF, as well as other individuals impacted by the decision. It caused many people's reproductive treatments to come to an abrupt halt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Balancing profit and patient welfare<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Every woman present at the discussion discussed the intense psychological stress and loneliness associated with receiving reproductive therapy. The epidemic had already caused some of them to have their reproductive treatments interrupted, only for the Supreme Court's ruling to throw them off course once again. According to fertility patient and nurse practitioner Kendall Diebold, \"the IVF world as a whole is so isolating and lonely.\" \"And all of that has really been taken by this, and it has just been magnified and filled with sadness, grief, and anger.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Internal medicine specialist Dr. Rachel Charles, who also has lupus, talked about the rigorous treatment plan she had to follow in order to do IVF and get ready for an embryo transfer. Rather than move on with an embryo transfer, she made the decision in February to take a break from the daily hormone injections. In a previous interview, Rebecca Mathews, 36, who is the mother of two IVF-conceived children, told The 19th that she was shocked and angry at the same time when she learned of the decision. She still has a frozen embryo and is unsure of what to do with it.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating legal turmoil: IVF company registers to lobby Washington","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-legal-turmoil-ivf-company-registers-to-lobby-washington","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6902","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6871,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_date_gmt":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_content":"\n

The Biden administration<\/a> remained dedicated to its alliances in the strategically significant Indo-Pacific area, one day after a US$95 billion <\/a>foreign assistance package omitted economic help pledged for the region as the US strives to counter China's influence there. We at the White House<\/a> and State Department are still in favor of funding authorization and appropriation. Deputy assistant secretary Camille Dawson of the US State Department stated, \"We feel it's critically important to continue working in close concert and in support of the freely associated states<\/a>,\" referring to the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau. Dawson said this in answer to a query from the Post at a press conference on the second anniversary of US President Joe Biden's Indo-Pacific Strategy announcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Navigating a Strategic Landscape<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The agreement is viewed as critical to Washington's efforts to sustain<\/a> its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken once declared that \"our planet's future will be written,\" despite growing concerns<\/a> about what some have called Beijing's coercive influence campaign.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That tactic may have its roots in the Compact of Free Association (Cofa), an agreement<\/a> that has guided US relations with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau for many years. First signed in 1986, the Cofa accord provides financial help and a legal framework<\/a> allowing its residents to live, work, and attend school in the United States in exchange for the US military having access to the land, air, and sea of the three Pacific island<\/a> nations. While Palau's Cofa program is scheduled to expire in September, that of the Marshall Islands and Micronesia expired on September 30. Last year, new agreements were established and extended, and Biden promised the three nations US$7.1 billion<\/a> spread over 20 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Because nonviable embryos are occasionally discarded or utilized for research, the Alabama court's decision has sparked worries that anyone participating in IVF may be prosecuted, and that it may also inspire other states to take similar legal action. Sen. Tammy Duckworth<\/a>, a Democrat and veteran of the Iraq War who was seriously injured in battle in 2004; she requested that the Senate take up her \"Access to Family Building Act\" legislation right now. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Alabama Supreme Court's decision last month that frozen embryos were lawfully regarded infants sparked fresh requests for federal safeguards for reproductive therapies, which led to the IVF business CooperSurgical filing. The decision, which caused some clinics in Alabama to stop IVF procedures, has set up a nationwide IVF firestorm. As the election draws near, Democrats are hammering Republicans on the matter, while the GOP is rushing to take positions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbying in Washington<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Thorn Run Partners, a Washington-based company licensed to effectively advocate on \"Fertility\" and \"Maternal Health,\" was engaged by CooperSurgical. This week, lawmakers in Alabama's Republican-controlled legislature passed a bill to safeguard IVF procedures. However, conservatives swiftly prevented the Senate from adopting the first federal policy. The Alabama Wrongful Death of a Minor Act made the destruction of embryos illegal, according to the court's ruling in that state's case. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Families alleging CooperSurgical caused the loss of their embryos are suing the corporation for undisclosed damages in many jurisdictions over identical allegations. CooperSurgical representative Adeena Fried responded, \"The company wanted to see that IVF remains accessible nationwide,\" when questioned about the choice to lobby. \"Our goal is to guarantee that the greatest goods and innovations can be utilized in Alabama and throughout the country to strengthen families and welcome new members into the world,\" the spokesperson stated. \"As of right now, a lot of clinics in Alabama are closed, and legislation nationwide needs to support the entire fertility industry.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The role of lobbying in reproductive technology<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In a similar vein, GenBioPro, a different reproductive health care firm, which manufactures mifepristone generically, approached Washington following a siege of their product. In 2022, a lobbying firm filed to represent the company, and the following year, GenBioPro filed a lawsuit against the FDA to maintain the drug's availability. CooperSurgical, a Connecticut-based corporation, recruited three seasoned Hill staffers, one of which was Jessie Brairton, a former Eli Lilly lobbyist and staff member of Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas). The other two lobbyists are Jacky Usyk, a veteran Democratic Senate assistant, and Andrew Rosenberg, a former aide to Sen. Ed Kennedy (D-Mass.), who co-founded the company. Federal filings state that CooperSurgical has not previously registered to lobby. Beasley met with Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra on Tuesday to talk about the turmoil and uncertainty caused by the Alabama Supreme Court decision that threatens IVF, as well as other individuals impacted by the decision. It caused many people's reproductive treatments to come to an abrupt halt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Balancing profit and patient welfare<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Every woman present at the discussion discussed the intense psychological stress and loneliness associated with receiving reproductive therapy. The epidemic had already caused some of them to have their reproductive treatments interrupted, only for the Supreme Court's ruling to throw them off course once again. According to fertility patient and nurse practitioner Kendall Diebold, \"the IVF world as a whole is so isolating and lonely.\" \"And all of that has really been taken by this, and it has just been magnified and filled with sadness, grief, and anger.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Internal medicine specialist Dr. Rachel Charles, who also has lupus, talked about the rigorous treatment plan she had to follow in order to do IVF and get ready for an embryo transfer. Rather than move on with an embryo transfer, she made the decision in February to take a break from the daily hormone injections. In a previous interview, Rebecca Mathews, 36, who is the mother of two IVF-conceived children, told The 19th that she was shocked and angry at the same time when she learned of the decision. She still has a frozen embryo and is unsure of what to do with it.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating legal turmoil: IVF company registers to lobby Washington","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-legal-turmoil-ivf-company-registers-to-lobby-washington","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6902","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6871,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_date_gmt":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_content":"\n

The Biden administration<\/a> remained dedicated to its alliances in the strategically significant Indo-Pacific area, one day after a US$95 billion <\/a>foreign assistance package omitted economic help pledged for the region as the US strives to counter China's influence there. We at the White House<\/a> and State Department are still in favor of funding authorization and appropriation. Deputy assistant secretary Camille Dawson of the US State Department stated, \"We feel it's critically important to continue working in close concert and in support of the freely associated states<\/a>,\" referring to the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau. Dawson said this in answer to a query from the Post at a press conference on the second anniversary of US President Joe Biden's Indo-Pacific Strategy announcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Navigating a Strategic Landscape<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The agreement is viewed as critical to Washington's efforts to sustain<\/a> its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken once declared that \"our planet's future will be written,\" despite growing concerns<\/a> about what some have called Beijing's coercive influence campaign.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That tactic may have its roots in the Compact of Free Association (Cofa), an agreement<\/a> that has guided US relations with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau for many years. First signed in 1986, the Cofa accord provides financial help and a legal framework<\/a> allowing its residents to live, work, and attend school in the United States in exchange for the US military having access to the land, air, and sea of the three Pacific island<\/a> nations. While Palau's Cofa program is scheduled to expire in September, that of the Marshall Islands and Micronesia expired on September 30. Last year, new agreements were established and extended, and Biden promised the three nations US$7.1 billion<\/a> spread over 20 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Challenges in the courtroom<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Because nonviable embryos are occasionally discarded or utilized for research, the Alabama court's decision has sparked worries that anyone participating in IVF may be prosecuted, and that it may also inspire other states to take similar legal action. Sen. Tammy Duckworth<\/a>, a Democrat and veteran of the Iraq War who was seriously injured in battle in 2004; she requested that the Senate take up her \"Access to Family Building Act\" legislation right now. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Alabama Supreme Court's decision last month that frozen embryos were lawfully regarded infants sparked fresh requests for federal safeguards for reproductive therapies, which led to the IVF business CooperSurgical filing. The decision, which caused some clinics in Alabama to stop IVF procedures, has set up a nationwide IVF firestorm. As the election draws near, Democrats are hammering Republicans on the matter, while the GOP is rushing to take positions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbying in Washington<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Thorn Run Partners, a Washington-based company licensed to effectively advocate on \"Fertility\" and \"Maternal Health,\" was engaged by CooperSurgical. This week, lawmakers in Alabama's Republican-controlled legislature passed a bill to safeguard IVF procedures. However, conservatives swiftly prevented the Senate from adopting the first federal policy. The Alabama Wrongful Death of a Minor Act made the destruction of embryos illegal, according to the court's ruling in that state's case. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Families alleging CooperSurgical caused the loss of their embryos are suing the corporation for undisclosed damages in many jurisdictions over identical allegations. CooperSurgical representative Adeena Fried responded, \"The company wanted to see that IVF remains accessible nationwide,\" when questioned about the choice to lobby. \"Our goal is to guarantee that the greatest goods and innovations can be utilized in Alabama and throughout the country to strengthen families and welcome new members into the world,\" the spokesperson stated. \"As of right now, a lot of clinics in Alabama are closed, and legislation nationwide needs to support the entire fertility industry.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The role of lobbying in reproductive technology<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In a similar vein, GenBioPro, a different reproductive health care firm, which manufactures mifepristone generically, approached Washington following a siege of their product. In 2022, a lobbying firm filed to represent the company, and the following year, GenBioPro filed a lawsuit against the FDA to maintain the drug's availability. CooperSurgical, a Connecticut-based corporation, recruited three seasoned Hill staffers, one of which was Jessie Brairton, a former Eli Lilly lobbyist and staff member of Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas). The other two lobbyists are Jacky Usyk, a veteran Democratic Senate assistant, and Andrew Rosenberg, a former aide to Sen. Ed Kennedy (D-Mass.), who co-founded the company. Federal filings state that CooperSurgical has not previously registered to lobby. Beasley met with Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra on Tuesday to talk about the turmoil and uncertainty caused by the Alabama Supreme Court decision that threatens IVF, as well as other individuals impacted by the decision. It caused many people's reproductive treatments to come to an abrupt halt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Balancing profit and patient welfare<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Every woman present at the discussion discussed the intense psychological stress and loneliness associated with receiving reproductive therapy. The epidemic had already caused some of them to have their reproductive treatments interrupted, only for the Supreme Court's ruling to throw them off course once again. According to fertility patient and nurse practitioner Kendall Diebold, \"the IVF world as a whole is so isolating and lonely.\" \"And all of that has really been taken by this, and it has just been magnified and filled with sadness, grief, and anger.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Internal medicine specialist Dr. Rachel Charles, who also has lupus, talked about the rigorous treatment plan she had to follow in order to do IVF and get ready for an embryo transfer. Rather than move on with an embryo transfer, she made the decision in February to take a break from the daily hormone injections. In a previous interview, Rebecca Mathews, 36, who is the mother of two IVF-conceived children, told The 19th that she was shocked and angry at the same time when she learned of the decision. She still has a frozen embryo and is unsure of what to do with it.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating legal turmoil: IVF company registers to lobby Washington","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-legal-turmoil-ivf-company-registers-to-lobby-washington","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6902","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6871,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_date_gmt":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_content":"\n

The Biden administration<\/a> remained dedicated to its alliances in the strategically significant Indo-Pacific area, one day after a US$95 billion <\/a>foreign assistance package omitted economic help pledged for the region as the US strives to counter China's influence there. We at the White House<\/a> and State Department are still in favor of funding authorization and appropriation. Deputy assistant secretary Camille Dawson of the US State Department stated, \"We feel it's critically important to continue working in close concert and in support of the freely associated states<\/a>,\" referring to the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau. Dawson said this in answer to a query from the Post at a press conference on the second anniversary of US President Joe Biden's Indo-Pacific Strategy announcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Navigating a Strategic Landscape<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The agreement is viewed as critical to Washington's efforts to sustain<\/a> its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken once declared that \"our planet's future will be written,\" despite growing concerns<\/a> about what some have called Beijing's coercive influence campaign.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That tactic may have its roots in the Compact of Free Association (Cofa), an agreement<\/a> that has guided US relations with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau for many years. First signed in 1986, the Cofa accord provides financial help and a legal framework<\/a> allowing its residents to live, work, and attend school in the United States in exchange for the US military having access to the land, air, and sea of the three Pacific island<\/a> nations. While Palau's Cofa program is scheduled to expire in September, that of the Marshall Islands and Micronesia expired on September 30. Last year, new agreements were established and extended, and Biden promised the three nations US$7.1 billion<\/a> spread over 20 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

After an Alabama judge deemed frozen embryos to be children, Democrats attempted in vain to ram legislation through the U.S. Senate that would have guaranteed Americans' access to IVF and other assisted reproductive technologies. At least three Alabama IVF clinics stopped doing IVF, which combines eggs and sperm in a lab dish for infertile couples, after the state Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos should be treated like children. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Challenges in the courtroom<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Because nonviable embryos are occasionally discarded or utilized for research, the Alabama court's decision has sparked worries that anyone participating in IVF may be prosecuted, and that it may also inspire other states to take similar legal action. Sen. Tammy Duckworth<\/a>, a Democrat and veteran of the Iraq War who was seriously injured in battle in 2004; she requested that the Senate take up her \"Access to Family Building Act\" legislation right now. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Alabama Supreme Court's decision last month that frozen embryos were lawfully regarded infants sparked fresh requests for federal safeguards for reproductive therapies, which led to the IVF business CooperSurgical filing. The decision, which caused some clinics in Alabama to stop IVF procedures, has set up a nationwide IVF firestorm. As the election draws near, Democrats are hammering Republicans on the matter, while the GOP is rushing to take positions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbying in Washington<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Thorn Run Partners, a Washington-based company licensed to effectively advocate on \"Fertility\" and \"Maternal Health,\" was engaged by CooperSurgical. This week, lawmakers in Alabama's Republican-controlled legislature passed a bill to safeguard IVF procedures. However, conservatives swiftly prevented the Senate from adopting the first federal policy. The Alabama Wrongful Death of a Minor Act made the destruction of embryos illegal, according to the court's ruling in that state's case. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Families alleging CooperSurgical caused the loss of their embryos are suing the corporation for undisclosed damages in many jurisdictions over identical allegations. CooperSurgical representative Adeena Fried responded, \"The company wanted to see that IVF remains accessible nationwide,\" when questioned about the choice to lobby. \"Our goal is to guarantee that the greatest goods and innovations can be utilized in Alabama and throughout the country to strengthen families and welcome new members into the world,\" the spokesperson stated. \"As of right now, a lot of clinics in Alabama are closed, and legislation nationwide needs to support the entire fertility industry.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The role of lobbying in reproductive technology<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In a similar vein, GenBioPro, a different reproductive health care firm, which manufactures mifepristone generically, approached Washington following a siege of their product. In 2022, a lobbying firm filed to represent the company, and the following year, GenBioPro filed a lawsuit against the FDA to maintain the drug's availability. CooperSurgical, a Connecticut-based corporation, recruited three seasoned Hill staffers, one of which was Jessie Brairton, a former Eli Lilly lobbyist and staff member of Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas). The other two lobbyists are Jacky Usyk, a veteran Democratic Senate assistant, and Andrew Rosenberg, a former aide to Sen. Ed Kennedy (D-Mass.), who co-founded the company. Federal filings state that CooperSurgical has not previously registered to lobby. Beasley met with Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra on Tuesday to talk about the turmoil and uncertainty caused by the Alabama Supreme Court decision that threatens IVF, as well as other individuals impacted by the decision. It caused many people's reproductive treatments to come to an abrupt halt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Balancing profit and patient welfare<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Every woman present at the discussion discussed the intense psychological stress and loneliness associated with receiving reproductive therapy. The epidemic had already caused some of them to have their reproductive treatments interrupted, only for the Supreme Court's ruling to throw them off course once again. According to fertility patient and nurse practitioner Kendall Diebold, \"the IVF world as a whole is so isolating and lonely.\" \"And all of that has really been taken by this, and it has just been magnified and filled with sadness, grief, and anger.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Internal medicine specialist Dr. Rachel Charles, who also has lupus, talked about the rigorous treatment plan she had to follow in order to do IVF and get ready for an embryo transfer. Rather than move on with an embryo transfer, she made the decision in February to take a break from the daily hormone injections. In a previous interview, Rebecca Mathews, 36, who is the mother of two IVF-conceived children, told The 19th that she was shocked and angry at the same time when she learned of the decision. She still has a frozen embryo and is unsure of what to do with it.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating legal turmoil: IVF company registers to lobby Washington","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-legal-turmoil-ivf-company-registers-to-lobby-washington","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6902","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6871,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_date_gmt":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_content":"\n

The Biden administration<\/a> remained dedicated to its alliances in the strategically significant Indo-Pacific area, one day after a US$95 billion <\/a>foreign assistance package omitted economic help pledged for the region as the US strives to counter China's influence there. We at the White House<\/a> and State Department are still in favor of funding authorization and appropriation. Deputy assistant secretary Camille Dawson of the US State Department stated, \"We feel it's critically important to continue working in close concert and in support of the freely associated states<\/a>,\" referring to the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau. Dawson said this in answer to a query from the Post at a press conference on the second anniversary of US President Joe Biden's Indo-Pacific Strategy announcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Navigating a Strategic Landscape<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The agreement is viewed as critical to Washington's efforts to sustain<\/a> its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken once declared that \"our planet's future will be written,\" despite growing concerns<\/a> about what some have called Beijing's coercive influence campaign.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That tactic may have its roots in the Compact of Free Association (Cofa), an agreement<\/a> that has guided US relations with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau for many years. First signed in 1986, the Cofa accord provides financial help and a legal framework<\/a> allowing its residents to live, work, and attend school in the United States in exchange for the US military having access to the land, air, and sea of the three Pacific island<\/a> nations. While Palau's Cofa program is scheduled to expire in September, that of the Marshall Islands and Micronesia expired on September 30. Last year, new agreements were established and extended, and Biden promised the three nations US$7.1 billion<\/a> spread over 20 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

In conclusion, Chinese business lobbying in Washington was virtually nonexistent until a few years ago, according to Craig Singleton, a senior researcher at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, but that all changed when the US government started pursuing Huawei. According to Singleton, there is room for improvement in the Department of Justice's involvement in limiting the CCP's negative lobbying effect on Capitol Hill. The Department of Justice is in charge of implementing and upholding FARA.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US lobbyists reevaluate ties: Shedding Chinese clients amid heightened oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-lobbyists-reevaluate-ties-shedding-chinese-clients-amid-heightened-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6913","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6902,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_content":"\n

After an Alabama judge deemed frozen embryos to be children, Democrats attempted in vain to ram legislation through the U.S. Senate that would have guaranteed Americans' access to IVF and other assisted reproductive technologies. At least three Alabama IVF clinics stopped doing IVF, which combines eggs and sperm in a lab dish for infertile couples, after the state Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos should be treated like children. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Challenges in the courtroom<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Because nonviable embryos are occasionally discarded or utilized for research, the Alabama court's decision has sparked worries that anyone participating in IVF may be prosecuted, and that it may also inspire other states to take similar legal action. Sen. Tammy Duckworth<\/a>, a Democrat and veteran of the Iraq War who was seriously injured in battle in 2004; she requested that the Senate take up her \"Access to Family Building Act\" legislation right now. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Alabama Supreme Court's decision last month that frozen embryos were lawfully regarded infants sparked fresh requests for federal safeguards for reproductive therapies, which led to the IVF business CooperSurgical filing. The decision, which caused some clinics in Alabama to stop IVF procedures, has set up a nationwide IVF firestorm. As the election draws near, Democrats are hammering Republicans on the matter, while the GOP is rushing to take positions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbying in Washington<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Thorn Run Partners, a Washington-based company licensed to effectively advocate on \"Fertility\" and \"Maternal Health,\" was engaged by CooperSurgical. This week, lawmakers in Alabama's Republican-controlled legislature passed a bill to safeguard IVF procedures. However, conservatives swiftly prevented the Senate from adopting the first federal policy. The Alabama Wrongful Death of a Minor Act made the destruction of embryos illegal, according to the court's ruling in that state's case. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Families alleging CooperSurgical caused the loss of their embryos are suing the corporation for undisclosed damages in many jurisdictions over identical allegations. CooperSurgical representative Adeena Fried responded, \"The company wanted to see that IVF remains accessible nationwide,\" when questioned about the choice to lobby. \"Our goal is to guarantee that the greatest goods and innovations can be utilized in Alabama and throughout the country to strengthen families and welcome new members into the world,\" the spokesperson stated. \"As of right now, a lot of clinics in Alabama are closed, and legislation nationwide needs to support the entire fertility industry.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The role of lobbying in reproductive technology<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In a similar vein, GenBioPro, a different reproductive health care firm, which manufactures mifepristone generically, approached Washington following a siege of their product. In 2022, a lobbying firm filed to represent the company, and the following year, GenBioPro filed a lawsuit against the FDA to maintain the drug's availability. CooperSurgical, a Connecticut-based corporation, recruited three seasoned Hill staffers, one of which was Jessie Brairton, a former Eli Lilly lobbyist and staff member of Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas). The other two lobbyists are Jacky Usyk, a veteran Democratic Senate assistant, and Andrew Rosenberg, a former aide to Sen. Ed Kennedy (D-Mass.), who co-founded the company. Federal filings state that CooperSurgical has not previously registered to lobby. Beasley met with Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra on Tuesday to talk about the turmoil and uncertainty caused by the Alabama Supreme Court decision that threatens IVF, as well as other individuals impacted by the decision. It caused many people's reproductive treatments to come to an abrupt halt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Balancing profit and patient welfare<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Every woman present at the discussion discussed the intense psychological stress and loneliness associated with receiving reproductive therapy. The epidemic had already caused some of them to have their reproductive treatments interrupted, only for the Supreme Court's ruling to throw them off course once again. According to fertility patient and nurse practitioner Kendall Diebold, \"the IVF world as a whole is so isolating and lonely.\" \"And all of that has really been taken by this, and it has just been magnified and filled with sadness, grief, and anger.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Internal medicine specialist Dr. Rachel Charles, who also has lupus, talked about the rigorous treatment plan she had to follow in order to do IVF and get ready for an embryo transfer. Rather than move on with an embryo transfer, she made the decision in February to take a break from the daily hormone injections. In a previous interview, Rebecca Mathews, 36, who is the mother of two IVF-conceived children, told The 19th that she was shocked and angry at the same time when she learned of the decision. She still has a frozen embryo and is unsure of what to do with it.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating legal turmoil: IVF company registers to lobby Washington","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-legal-turmoil-ivf-company-registers-to-lobby-washington","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6902","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6871,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_date_gmt":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_content":"\n

The Biden administration<\/a> remained dedicated to its alliances in the strategically significant Indo-Pacific area, one day after a US$95 billion <\/a>foreign assistance package omitted economic help pledged for the region as the US strives to counter China's influence there. We at the White House<\/a> and State Department are still in favor of funding authorization and appropriation. Deputy assistant secretary Camille Dawson of the US State Department stated, \"We feel it's critically important to continue working in close concert and in support of the freely associated states<\/a>,\" referring to the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau. Dawson said this in answer to a query from the Post at a press conference on the second anniversary of US President Joe Biden's Indo-Pacific Strategy announcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Navigating a Strategic Landscape<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The agreement is viewed as critical to Washington's efforts to sustain<\/a> its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken once declared that \"our planet's future will be written,\" despite growing concerns<\/a> about what some have called Beijing's coercive influence campaign.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That tactic may have its roots in the Compact of Free Association (Cofa), an agreement<\/a> that has guided US relations with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau for many years. First signed in 1986, the Cofa accord provides financial help and a legal framework<\/a> allowing its residents to live, work, and attend school in the United States in exchange for the US military having access to the land, air, and sea of the three Pacific island<\/a> nations. While Palau's Cofa program is scheduled to expire in September, that of the Marshall Islands and Micronesia expired on September 30. Last year, new agreements were established and extended, and Biden promised the three nations US$7.1 billion<\/a> spread over 20 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Additionally, the Vogel Group has ceased lobbying on behalf of Complete Genomics, a division of BGI, a genetic technology business, and DJI, a Chinese drone manufacturer. Hesai and DJI are both included in the 1260H list. While its former parent firm, BGI, is on the list, Complete Genomics is not. While it is challenging to enact legislation that forbids Congressmen from meeting with anybody, Republican Senator Marco Rubio told VOA that certain congressional offices have made the decision to forgo meetings with lobbying firms that represent Chinese defense businesses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Chinese business lobbying in Washington was virtually nonexistent until a few years ago, according to Craig Singleton, a senior researcher at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, but that all changed when the US government started pursuing Huawei. According to Singleton, there is room for improvement in the Department of Justice's involvement in limiting the CCP's negative lobbying effect on Capitol Hill. The Department of Justice is in charge of implementing and upholding FARA.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US lobbyists reevaluate ties: Shedding Chinese clients amid heightened oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-lobbyists-reevaluate-ties-shedding-chinese-clients-amid-heightened-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6913","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6902,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_content":"\n

After an Alabama judge deemed frozen embryos to be children, Democrats attempted in vain to ram legislation through the U.S. Senate that would have guaranteed Americans' access to IVF and other assisted reproductive technologies. At least three Alabama IVF clinics stopped doing IVF, which combines eggs and sperm in a lab dish for infertile couples, after the state Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos should be treated like children. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Challenges in the courtroom<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Because nonviable embryos are occasionally discarded or utilized for research, the Alabama court's decision has sparked worries that anyone participating in IVF may be prosecuted, and that it may also inspire other states to take similar legal action. Sen. Tammy Duckworth<\/a>, a Democrat and veteran of the Iraq War who was seriously injured in battle in 2004; she requested that the Senate take up her \"Access to Family Building Act\" legislation right now. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Alabama Supreme Court's decision last month that frozen embryos were lawfully regarded infants sparked fresh requests for federal safeguards for reproductive therapies, which led to the IVF business CooperSurgical filing. The decision, which caused some clinics in Alabama to stop IVF procedures, has set up a nationwide IVF firestorm. As the election draws near, Democrats are hammering Republicans on the matter, while the GOP is rushing to take positions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbying in Washington<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Thorn Run Partners, a Washington-based company licensed to effectively advocate on \"Fertility\" and \"Maternal Health,\" was engaged by CooperSurgical. This week, lawmakers in Alabama's Republican-controlled legislature passed a bill to safeguard IVF procedures. However, conservatives swiftly prevented the Senate from adopting the first federal policy. The Alabama Wrongful Death of a Minor Act made the destruction of embryos illegal, according to the court's ruling in that state's case. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Families alleging CooperSurgical caused the loss of their embryos are suing the corporation for undisclosed damages in many jurisdictions over identical allegations. CooperSurgical representative Adeena Fried responded, \"The company wanted to see that IVF remains accessible nationwide,\" when questioned about the choice to lobby. \"Our goal is to guarantee that the greatest goods and innovations can be utilized in Alabama and throughout the country to strengthen families and welcome new members into the world,\" the spokesperson stated. \"As of right now, a lot of clinics in Alabama are closed, and legislation nationwide needs to support the entire fertility industry.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The role of lobbying in reproductive technology<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In a similar vein, GenBioPro, a different reproductive health care firm, which manufactures mifepristone generically, approached Washington following a siege of their product. In 2022, a lobbying firm filed to represent the company, and the following year, GenBioPro filed a lawsuit against the FDA to maintain the drug's availability. CooperSurgical, a Connecticut-based corporation, recruited three seasoned Hill staffers, one of which was Jessie Brairton, a former Eli Lilly lobbyist and staff member of Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas). The other two lobbyists are Jacky Usyk, a veteran Democratic Senate assistant, and Andrew Rosenberg, a former aide to Sen. Ed Kennedy (D-Mass.), who co-founded the company. Federal filings state that CooperSurgical has not previously registered to lobby. Beasley met with Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra on Tuesday to talk about the turmoil and uncertainty caused by the Alabama Supreme Court decision that threatens IVF, as well as other individuals impacted by the decision. It caused many people's reproductive treatments to come to an abrupt halt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Balancing profit and patient welfare<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Every woman present at the discussion discussed the intense psychological stress and loneliness associated with receiving reproductive therapy. The epidemic had already caused some of them to have their reproductive treatments interrupted, only for the Supreme Court's ruling to throw them off course once again. According to fertility patient and nurse practitioner Kendall Diebold, \"the IVF world as a whole is so isolating and lonely.\" \"And all of that has really been taken by this, and it has just been magnified and filled with sadness, grief, and anger.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Internal medicine specialist Dr. Rachel Charles, who also has lupus, talked about the rigorous treatment plan she had to follow in order to do IVF and get ready for an embryo transfer. Rather than move on with an embryo transfer, she made the decision in February to take a break from the daily hormone injections. In a previous interview, Rebecca Mathews, 36, who is the mother of two IVF-conceived children, told The 19th that she was shocked and angry at the same time when she learned of the decision. She still has a frozen embryo and is unsure of what to do with it.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating legal turmoil: IVF company registers to lobby Washington","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-legal-turmoil-ivf-company-registers-to-lobby-washington","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6902","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6871,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_date_gmt":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_content":"\n

The Biden administration<\/a> remained dedicated to its alliances in the strategically significant Indo-Pacific area, one day after a US$95 billion <\/a>foreign assistance package omitted economic help pledged for the region as the US strives to counter China's influence there. We at the White House<\/a> and State Department are still in favor of funding authorization and appropriation. Deputy assistant secretary Camille Dawson of the US State Department stated, \"We feel it's critically important to continue working in close concert and in support of the freely associated states<\/a>,\" referring to the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau. Dawson said this in answer to a query from the Post at a press conference on the second anniversary of US President Joe Biden's Indo-Pacific Strategy announcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Navigating a Strategic Landscape<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The agreement is viewed as critical to Washington's efforts to sustain<\/a> its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken once declared that \"our planet's future will be written,\" despite growing concerns<\/a> about what some have called Beijing's coercive influence campaign.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That tactic may have its roots in the Compact of Free Association (Cofa), an agreement<\/a> that has guided US relations with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau for many years. First signed in 1986, the Cofa accord provides financial help and a legal framework<\/a> allowing its residents to live, work, and attend school in the United States in exchange for the US military having access to the land, air, and sea of the three Pacific island<\/a> nations. While Palau's Cofa program is scheduled to expire in September, that of the Marshall Islands and Micronesia expired on September 30. Last year, new agreements were established and extended, and Biden promised the three nations US$7.1 billion<\/a> spread over 20 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

As of late February, at least five American lobbying companies had lost Chinese business. Steptoe LLP and BGI, a Shenzhen biotech company, have ended their business relationship. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld ended its partnership with Xiaomi, a Chinese electronics business not on the 1260H list, and filed cease-and-desist filings to halt advocating for Hesai Group, a Chinese manufacturer of LiDARs. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Additionally, the Vogel Group has ceased lobbying on behalf of Complete Genomics, a division of BGI, a genetic technology business, and DJI, a Chinese drone manufacturer. Hesai and DJI are both included in the 1260H list. While its former parent firm, BGI, is on the list, Complete Genomics is not. While it is challenging to enact legislation that forbids Congressmen from meeting with anybody, Republican Senator Marco Rubio told VOA that certain congressional offices have made the decision to forgo meetings with lobbying firms that represent Chinese defense businesses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Chinese business lobbying in Washington was virtually nonexistent until a few years ago, according to Craig Singleton, a senior researcher at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, but that all changed when the US government started pursuing Huawei. According to Singleton, there is room for improvement in the Department of Justice's involvement in limiting the CCP's negative lobbying effect on Capitol Hill. The Department of Justice is in charge of implementing and upholding FARA.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US lobbyists reevaluate ties: Shedding Chinese clients amid heightened oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-lobbyists-reevaluate-ties-shedding-chinese-clients-amid-heightened-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6913","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6902,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_content":"\n

After an Alabama judge deemed frozen embryos to be children, Democrats attempted in vain to ram legislation through the U.S. Senate that would have guaranteed Americans' access to IVF and other assisted reproductive technologies. At least three Alabama IVF clinics stopped doing IVF, which combines eggs and sperm in a lab dish for infertile couples, after the state Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos should be treated like children. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Challenges in the courtroom<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Because nonviable embryos are occasionally discarded or utilized for research, the Alabama court's decision has sparked worries that anyone participating in IVF may be prosecuted, and that it may also inspire other states to take similar legal action. Sen. Tammy Duckworth<\/a>, a Democrat and veteran of the Iraq War who was seriously injured in battle in 2004; she requested that the Senate take up her \"Access to Family Building Act\" legislation right now. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Alabama Supreme Court's decision last month that frozen embryos were lawfully regarded infants sparked fresh requests for federal safeguards for reproductive therapies, which led to the IVF business CooperSurgical filing. The decision, which caused some clinics in Alabama to stop IVF procedures, has set up a nationwide IVF firestorm. As the election draws near, Democrats are hammering Republicans on the matter, while the GOP is rushing to take positions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbying in Washington<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Thorn Run Partners, a Washington-based company licensed to effectively advocate on \"Fertility\" and \"Maternal Health,\" was engaged by CooperSurgical. This week, lawmakers in Alabama's Republican-controlled legislature passed a bill to safeguard IVF procedures. However, conservatives swiftly prevented the Senate from adopting the first federal policy. The Alabama Wrongful Death of a Minor Act made the destruction of embryos illegal, according to the court's ruling in that state's case. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Families alleging CooperSurgical caused the loss of their embryos are suing the corporation for undisclosed damages in many jurisdictions over identical allegations. CooperSurgical representative Adeena Fried responded, \"The company wanted to see that IVF remains accessible nationwide,\" when questioned about the choice to lobby. \"Our goal is to guarantee that the greatest goods and innovations can be utilized in Alabama and throughout the country to strengthen families and welcome new members into the world,\" the spokesperson stated. \"As of right now, a lot of clinics in Alabama are closed, and legislation nationwide needs to support the entire fertility industry.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The role of lobbying in reproductive technology<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In a similar vein, GenBioPro, a different reproductive health care firm, which manufactures mifepristone generically, approached Washington following a siege of their product. In 2022, a lobbying firm filed to represent the company, and the following year, GenBioPro filed a lawsuit against the FDA to maintain the drug's availability. CooperSurgical, a Connecticut-based corporation, recruited three seasoned Hill staffers, one of which was Jessie Brairton, a former Eli Lilly lobbyist and staff member of Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas). The other two lobbyists are Jacky Usyk, a veteran Democratic Senate assistant, and Andrew Rosenberg, a former aide to Sen. Ed Kennedy (D-Mass.), who co-founded the company. Federal filings state that CooperSurgical has not previously registered to lobby. Beasley met with Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra on Tuesday to talk about the turmoil and uncertainty caused by the Alabama Supreme Court decision that threatens IVF, as well as other individuals impacted by the decision. It caused many people's reproductive treatments to come to an abrupt halt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Balancing profit and patient welfare<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Every woman present at the discussion discussed the intense psychological stress and loneliness associated with receiving reproductive therapy. The epidemic had already caused some of them to have their reproductive treatments interrupted, only for the Supreme Court's ruling to throw them off course once again. According to fertility patient and nurse practitioner Kendall Diebold, \"the IVF world as a whole is so isolating and lonely.\" \"And all of that has really been taken by this, and it has just been magnified and filled with sadness, grief, and anger.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Internal medicine specialist Dr. Rachel Charles, who also has lupus, talked about the rigorous treatment plan she had to follow in order to do IVF and get ready for an embryo transfer. Rather than move on with an embryo transfer, she made the decision in February to take a break from the daily hormone injections. In a previous interview, Rebecca Mathews, 36, who is the mother of two IVF-conceived children, told The 19th that she was shocked and angry at the same time when she learned of the decision. She still has a frozen embryo and is unsure of what to do with it.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating legal turmoil: IVF company registers to lobby Washington","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-legal-turmoil-ivf-company-registers-to-lobby-washington","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6902","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6871,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_date_gmt":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_content":"\n

The Biden administration<\/a> remained dedicated to its alliances in the strategically significant Indo-Pacific area, one day after a US$95 billion <\/a>foreign assistance package omitted economic help pledged for the region as the US strives to counter China's influence there. We at the White House<\/a> and State Department are still in favor of funding authorization and appropriation. Deputy assistant secretary Camille Dawson of the US State Department stated, \"We feel it's critically important to continue working in close concert and in support of the freely associated states<\/a>,\" referring to the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau. Dawson said this in answer to a query from the Post at a press conference on the second anniversary of US President Joe Biden's Indo-Pacific Strategy announcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Navigating a Strategic Landscape<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The agreement is viewed as critical to Washington's efforts to sustain<\/a> its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken once declared that \"our planet's future will be written,\" despite growing concerns<\/a> about what some have called Beijing's coercive influence campaign.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That tactic may have its roots in the Compact of Free Association (Cofa), an agreement<\/a> that has guided US relations with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau for many years. First signed in 1986, the Cofa accord provides financial help and a legal framework<\/a> allowing its residents to live, work, and attend school in the United States in exchange for the US military having access to the land, air, and sea of the three Pacific island<\/a> nations. While Palau's Cofa program is scheduled to expire in September, that of the Marshall Islands and Micronesia expired on September 30. Last year, new agreements were established and extended, and Biden promised the three nations US$7.1 billion<\/a> spread over 20 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Rising concerns over reputation and risk<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

As of late February, at least five American lobbying companies had lost Chinese business. Steptoe LLP and BGI, a Shenzhen biotech company, have ended their business relationship. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld ended its partnership with Xiaomi, a Chinese electronics business not on the 1260H list, and filed cease-and-desist filings to halt advocating for Hesai Group, a Chinese manufacturer of LiDARs. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Additionally, the Vogel Group has ceased lobbying on behalf of Complete Genomics, a division of BGI, a genetic technology business, and DJI, a Chinese drone manufacturer. Hesai and DJI are both included in the 1260H list. While its former parent firm, BGI, is on the list, Complete Genomics is not. While it is challenging to enact legislation that forbids Congressmen from meeting with anybody, Republican Senator Marco Rubio told VOA that certain congressional offices have made the decision to forgo meetings with lobbying firms that represent Chinese defense businesses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Chinese business lobbying in Washington was virtually nonexistent until a few years ago, according to Craig Singleton, a senior researcher at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, but that all changed when the US government started pursuing Huawei. According to Singleton, there is room for improvement in the Department of Justice's involvement in limiting the CCP's negative lobbying effect on Capitol Hill. The Department of Justice is in charge of implementing and upholding FARA.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US lobbyists reevaluate ties: Shedding Chinese clients amid heightened oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-lobbyists-reevaluate-ties-shedding-chinese-clients-amid-heightened-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6913","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6902,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_content":"\n

After an Alabama judge deemed frozen embryos to be children, Democrats attempted in vain to ram legislation through the U.S. Senate that would have guaranteed Americans' access to IVF and other assisted reproductive technologies. At least three Alabama IVF clinics stopped doing IVF, which combines eggs and sperm in a lab dish for infertile couples, after the state Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos should be treated like children. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Challenges in the courtroom<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Because nonviable embryos are occasionally discarded or utilized for research, the Alabama court's decision has sparked worries that anyone participating in IVF may be prosecuted, and that it may also inspire other states to take similar legal action. Sen. Tammy Duckworth<\/a>, a Democrat and veteran of the Iraq War who was seriously injured in battle in 2004; she requested that the Senate take up her \"Access to Family Building Act\" legislation right now. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Alabama Supreme Court's decision last month that frozen embryos were lawfully regarded infants sparked fresh requests for federal safeguards for reproductive therapies, which led to the IVF business CooperSurgical filing. The decision, which caused some clinics in Alabama to stop IVF procedures, has set up a nationwide IVF firestorm. As the election draws near, Democrats are hammering Republicans on the matter, while the GOP is rushing to take positions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbying in Washington<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Thorn Run Partners, a Washington-based company licensed to effectively advocate on \"Fertility\" and \"Maternal Health,\" was engaged by CooperSurgical. This week, lawmakers in Alabama's Republican-controlled legislature passed a bill to safeguard IVF procedures. However, conservatives swiftly prevented the Senate from adopting the first federal policy. The Alabama Wrongful Death of a Minor Act made the destruction of embryos illegal, according to the court's ruling in that state's case. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Families alleging CooperSurgical caused the loss of their embryos are suing the corporation for undisclosed damages in many jurisdictions over identical allegations. CooperSurgical representative Adeena Fried responded, \"The company wanted to see that IVF remains accessible nationwide,\" when questioned about the choice to lobby. \"Our goal is to guarantee that the greatest goods and innovations can be utilized in Alabama and throughout the country to strengthen families and welcome new members into the world,\" the spokesperson stated. \"As of right now, a lot of clinics in Alabama are closed, and legislation nationwide needs to support the entire fertility industry.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The role of lobbying in reproductive technology<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In a similar vein, GenBioPro, a different reproductive health care firm, which manufactures mifepristone generically, approached Washington following a siege of their product. In 2022, a lobbying firm filed to represent the company, and the following year, GenBioPro filed a lawsuit against the FDA to maintain the drug's availability. CooperSurgical, a Connecticut-based corporation, recruited three seasoned Hill staffers, one of which was Jessie Brairton, a former Eli Lilly lobbyist and staff member of Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas). The other two lobbyists are Jacky Usyk, a veteran Democratic Senate assistant, and Andrew Rosenberg, a former aide to Sen. Ed Kennedy (D-Mass.), who co-founded the company. Federal filings state that CooperSurgical has not previously registered to lobby. Beasley met with Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra on Tuesday to talk about the turmoil and uncertainty caused by the Alabama Supreme Court decision that threatens IVF, as well as other individuals impacted by the decision. It caused many people's reproductive treatments to come to an abrupt halt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Balancing profit and patient welfare<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Every woman present at the discussion discussed the intense psychological stress and loneliness associated with receiving reproductive therapy. The epidemic had already caused some of them to have their reproductive treatments interrupted, only for the Supreme Court's ruling to throw them off course once again. According to fertility patient and nurse practitioner Kendall Diebold, \"the IVF world as a whole is so isolating and lonely.\" \"And all of that has really been taken by this, and it has just been magnified and filled with sadness, grief, and anger.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Internal medicine specialist Dr. Rachel Charles, who also has lupus, talked about the rigorous treatment plan she had to follow in order to do IVF and get ready for an embryo transfer. Rather than move on with an embryo transfer, she made the decision in February to take a break from the daily hormone injections. In a previous interview, Rebecca Mathews, 36, who is the mother of two IVF-conceived children, told The 19th that she was shocked and angry at the same time when she learned of the decision. She still has a frozen embryo and is unsure of what to do with it.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating legal turmoil: IVF company registers to lobby Washington","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-legal-turmoil-ivf-company-registers-to-lobby-washington","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6902","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6871,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_date_gmt":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_content":"\n

The Biden administration<\/a> remained dedicated to its alliances in the strategically significant Indo-Pacific area, one day after a US$95 billion <\/a>foreign assistance package omitted economic help pledged for the region as the US strives to counter China's influence there. We at the White House<\/a> and State Department are still in favor of funding authorization and appropriation. Deputy assistant secretary Camille Dawson of the US State Department stated, \"We feel it's critically important to continue working in close concert and in support of the freely associated states<\/a>,\" referring to the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau. Dawson said this in answer to a query from the Post at a press conference on the second anniversary of US President Joe Biden's Indo-Pacific Strategy announcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Navigating a Strategic Landscape<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The agreement is viewed as critical to Washington's efforts to sustain<\/a> its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken once declared that \"our planet's future will be written,\" despite growing concerns<\/a> about what some have called Beijing's coercive influence campaign.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That tactic may have its roots in the Compact of Free Association (Cofa), an agreement<\/a> that has guided US relations with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau for many years. First signed in 1986, the Cofa accord provides financial help and a legal framework<\/a> allowing its residents to live, work, and attend school in the United States in exchange for the US military having access to the land, air, and sea of the three Pacific island<\/a> nations. While Palau's Cofa program is scheduled to expire in September, that of the Marshall Islands and Micronesia expired on September 30. Last year, new agreements were established and extended, and Biden promised the three nations US$7.1 billion<\/a> spread over 20 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

The U.S. Department of Defense released the 1260H list, a list of \"Chinese military companies\" that operate directly or indirectly in the United States, in late January. This move prompted efforts to increase the inspection of China's lobbying operations. After that, lawmakers said that they were thinking of passing a bill that would make it illegal for lobbyists representing businesses on the list to meet with members of Congress, not even to address issues on behalf of their American clients. A chart that listed several Chinese enterprises, including some military firms, along with the names of their lobbying firms and whether or not they were included on the 1260H list started to circulate on Capitol Hill after the 1260H list was released. According to Robert Sutter, a professor of international affairs practice at George Washington University's Elliott School, Chinese military organizations' lobbying operations have traditionally been vague, and enforcement has been lax.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rising concerns over reputation and risk<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

As of late February, at least five American lobbying companies had lost Chinese business. Steptoe LLP and BGI, a Shenzhen biotech company, have ended their business relationship. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld ended its partnership with Xiaomi, a Chinese electronics business not on the 1260H list, and filed cease-and-desist filings to halt advocating for Hesai Group, a Chinese manufacturer of LiDARs. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Additionally, the Vogel Group has ceased lobbying on behalf of Complete Genomics, a division of BGI, a genetic technology business, and DJI, a Chinese drone manufacturer. Hesai and DJI are both included in the 1260H list. While its former parent firm, BGI, is on the list, Complete Genomics is not. While it is challenging to enact legislation that forbids Congressmen from meeting with anybody, Republican Senator Marco Rubio told VOA that certain congressional offices have made the decision to forgo meetings with lobbying firms that represent Chinese defense businesses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Chinese business lobbying in Washington was virtually nonexistent until a few years ago, according to Craig Singleton, a senior researcher at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, but that all changed when the US government started pursuing Huawei. According to Singleton, there is room for improvement in the Department of Justice's involvement in limiting the CCP's negative lobbying effect on Capitol Hill. The Department of Justice is in charge of implementing and upholding FARA.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US lobbyists reevaluate ties: Shedding Chinese clients amid heightened oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-lobbyists-reevaluate-ties-shedding-chinese-clients-amid-heightened-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6913","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6902,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_content":"\n

After an Alabama judge deemed frozen embryos to be children, Democrats attempted in vain to ram legislation through the U.S. Senate that would have guaranteed Americans' access to IVF and other assisted reproductive technologies. At least three Alabama IVF clinics stopped doing IVF, which combines eggs and sperm in a lab dish for infertile couples, after the state Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos should be treated like children. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Challenges in the courtroom<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Because nonviable embryos are occasionally discarded or utilized for research, the Alabama court's decision has sparked worries that anyone participating in IVF may be prosecuted, and that it may also inspire other states to take similar legal action. Sen. Tammy Duckworth<\/a>, a Democrat and veteran of the Iraq War who was seriously injured in battle in 2004; she requested that the Senate take up her \"Access to Family Building Act\" legislation right now. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Alabama Supreme Court's decision last month that frozen embryos were lawfully regarded infants sparked fresh requests for federal safeguards for reproductive therapies, which led to the IVF business CooperSurgical filing. The decision, which caused some clinics in Alabama to stop IVF procedures, has set up a nationwide IVF firestorm. As the election draws near, Democrats are hammering Republicans on the matter, while the GOP is rushing to take positions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbying in Washington<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Thorn Run Partners, a Washington-based company licensed to effectively advocate on \"Fertility\" and \"Maternal Health,\" was engaged by CooperSurgical. This week, lawmakers in Alabama's Republican-controlled legislature passed a bill to safeguard IVF procedures. However, conservatives swiftly prevented the Senate from adopting the first federal policy. The Alabama Wrongful Death of a Minor Act made the destruction of embryos illegal, according to the court's ruling in that state's case. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Families alleging CooperSurgical caused the loss of their embryos are suing the corporation for undisclosed damages in many jurisdictions over identical allegations. CooperSurgical representative Adeena Fried responded, \"The company wanted to see that IVF remains accessible nationwide,\" when questioned about the choice to lobby. \"Our goal is to guarantee that the greatest goods and innovations can be utilized in Alabama and throughout the country to strengthen families and welcome new members into the world,\" the spokesperson stated. \"As of right now, a lot of clinics in Alabama are closed, and legislation nationwide needs to support the entire fertility industry.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The role of lobbying in reproductive technology<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In a similar vein, GenBioPro, a different reproductive health care firm, which manufactures mifepristone generically, approached Washington following a siege of their product. In 2022, a lobbying firm filed to represent the company, and the following year, GenBioPro filed a lawsuit against the FDA to maintain the drug's availability. CooperSurgical, a Connecticut-based corporation, recruited three seasoned Hill staffers, one of which was Jessie Brairton, a former Eli Lilly lobbyist and staff member of Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas). The other two lobbyists are Jacky Usyk, a veteran Democratic Senate assistant, and Andrew Rosenberg, a former aide to Sen. Ed Kennedy (D-Mass.), who co-founded the company. Federal filings state that CooperSurgical has not previously registered to lobby. Beasley met with Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra on Tuesday to talk about the turmoil and uncertainty caused by the Alabama Supreme Court decision that threatens IVF, as well as other individuals impacted by the decision. It caused many people's reproductive treatments to come to an abrupt halt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Balancing profit and patient welfare<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Every woman present at the discussion discussed the intense psychological stress and loneliness associated with receiving reproductive therapy. The epidemic had already caused some of them to have their reproductive treatments interrupted, only for the Supreme Court's ruling to throw them off course once again. According to fertility patient and nurse practitioner Kendall Diebold, \"the IVF world as a whole is so isolating and lonely.\" \"And all of that has really been taken by this, and it has just been magnified and filled with sadness, grief, and anger.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Internal medicine specialist Dr. Rachel Charles, who also has lupus, talked about the rigorous treatment plan she had to follow in order to do IVF and get ready for an embryo transfer. Rather than move on with an embryo transfer, she made the decision in February to take a break from the daily hormone injections. In a previous interview, Rebecca Mathews, 36, who is the mother of two IVF-conceived children, told The 19th that she was shocked and angry at the same time when she learned of the decision. She still has a frozen embryo and is unsure of what to do with it.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating legal turmoil: IVF company registers to lobby Washington","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-legal-turmoil-ivf-company-registers-to-lobby-washington","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6902","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6871,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_date_gmt":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_content":"\n

The Biden administration<\/a> remained dedicated to its alliances in the strategically significant Indo-Pacific area, one day after a US$95 billion <\/a>foreign assistance package omitted economic help pledged for the region as the US strives to counter China's influence there. We at the White House<\/a> and State Department are still in favor of funding authorization and appropriation. Deputy assistant secretary Camille Dawson of the US State Department stated, \"We feel it's critically important to continue working in close concert and in support of the freely associated states<\/a>,\" referring to the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau. Dawson said this in answer to a query from the Post at a press conference on the second anniversary of US President Joe Biden's Indo-Pacific Strategy announcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Navigating a Strategic Landscape<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The agreement is viewed as critical to Washington's efforts to sustain<\/a> its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken once declared that \"our planet's future will be written,\" despite growing concerns<\/a> about what some have called Beijing's coercive influence campaign.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That tactic may have its roots in the Compact of Free Association (Cofa), an agreement<\/a> that has guided US relations with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau for many years. First signed in 1986, the Cofa accord provides financial help and a legal framework<\/a> allowing its residents to live, work, and attend school in the United States in exchange for the US military having access to the land, air, and sea of the three Pacific island<\/a> nations. While Palau's Cofa program is scheduled to expire in September, that of the Marshall Islands and Micronesia expired on September 30. Last year, new agreements were established and extended, and Biden promised the three nations US$7.1 billion<\/a> spread over 20 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Lobbyists navigate complex legal and ethical terrain<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The U.S. Department of Defense released the 1260H list, a list of \"Chinese military companies\" that operate directly or indirectly in the United States, in late January. This move prompted efforts to increase the inspection of China's lobbying operations. After that, lawmakers said that they were thinking of passing a bill that would make it illegal for lobbyists representing businesses on the list to meet with members of Congress, not even to address issues on behalf of their American clients. A chart that listed several Chinese enterprises, including some military firms, along with the names of their lobbying firms and whether or not they were included on the 1260H list started to circulate on Capitol Hill after the 1260H list was released. According to Robert Sutter, a professor of international affairs practice at George Washington University's Elliott School, Chinese military organizations' lobbying operations have traditionally been vague, and enforcement has been lax.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rising concerns over reputation and risk<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

As of late February, at least five American lobbying companies had lost Chinese business. Steptoe LLP and BGI, a Shenzhen biotech company, have ended their business relationship. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld ended its partnership with Xiaomi, a Chinese electronics business not on the 1260H list, and filed cease-and-desist filings to halt advocating for Hesai Group, a Chinese manufacturer of LiDARs. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Additionally, the Vogel Group has ceased lobbying on behalf of Complete Genomics, a division of BGI, a genetic technology business, and DJI, a Chinese drone manufacturer. Hesai and DJI are both included in the 1260H list. While its former parent firm, BGI, is on the list, Complete Genomics is not. While it is challenging to enact legislation that forbids Congressmen from meeting with anybody, Republican Senator Marco Rubio told VOA that certain congressional offices have made the decision to forgo meetings with lobbying firms that represent Chinese defense businesses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Chinese business lobbying in Washington was virtually nonexistent until a few years ago, according to Craig Singleton, a senior researcher at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, but that all changed when the US government started pursuing Huawei. According to Singleton, there is room for improvement in the Department of Justice's involvement in limiting the CCP's negative lobbying effect on Capitol Hill. The Department of Justice is in charge of implementing and upholding FARA.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US lobbyists reevaluate ties: Shedding Chinese clients amid heightened oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-lobbyists-reevaluate-ties-shedding-chinese-clients-amid-heightened-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6913","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6902,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_content":"\n

After an Alabama judge deemed frozen embryos to be children, Democrats attempted in vain to ram legislation through the U.S. Senate that would have guaranteed Americans' access to IVF and other assisted reproductive technologies. At least three Alabama IVF clinics stopped doing IVF, which combines eggs and sperm in a lab dish for infertile couples, after the state Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos should be treated like children. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Challenges in the courtroom<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Because nonviable embryos are occasionally discarded or utilized for research, the Alabama court's decision has sparked worries that anyone participating in IVF may be prosecuted, and that it may also inspire other states to take similar legal action. Sen. Tammy Duckworth<\/a>, a Democrat and veteran of the Iraq War who was seriously injured in battle in 2004; she requested that the Senate take up her \"Access to Family Building Act\" legislation right now. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Alabama Supreme Court's decision last month that frozen embryos were lawfully regarded infants sparked fresh requests for federal safeguards for reproductive therapies, which led to the IVF business CooperSurgical filing. The decision, which caused some clinics in Alabama to stop IVF procedures, has set up a nationwide IVF firestorm. As the election draws near, Democrats are hammering Republicans on the matter, while the GOP is rushing to take positions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbying in Washington<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Thorn Run Partners, a Washington-based company licensed to effectively advocate on \"Fertility\" and \"Maternal Health,\" was engaged by CooperSurgical. This week, lawmakers in Alabama's Republican-controlled legislature passed a bill to safeguard IVF procedures. However, conservatives swiftly prevented the Senate from adopting the first federal policy. The Alabama Wrongful Death of a Minor Act made the destruction of embryos illegal, according to the court's ruling in that state's case. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Families alleging CooperSurgical caused the loss of their embryos are suing the corporation for undisclosed damages in many jurisdictions over identical allegations. CooperSurgical representative Adeena Fried responded, \"The company wanted to see that IVF remains accessible nationwide,\" when questioned about the choice to lobby. \"Our goal is to guarantee that the greatest goods and innovations can be utilized in Alabama and throughout the country to strengthen families and welcome new members into the world,\" the spokesperson stated. \"As of right now, a lot of clinics in Alabama are closed, and legislation nationwide needs to support the entire fertility industry.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The role of lobbying in reproductive technology<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In a similar vein, GenBioPro, a different reproductive health care firm, which manufactures mifepristone generically, approached Washington following a siege of their product. In 2022, a lobbying firm filed to represent the company, and the following year, GenBioPro filed a lawsuit against the FDA to maintain the drug's availability. CooperSurgical, a Connecticut-based corporation, recruited three seasoned Hill staffers, one of which was Jessie Brairton, a former Eli Lilly lobbyist and staff member of Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas). The other two lobbyists are Jacky Usyk, a veteran Democratic Senate assistant, and Andrew Rosenberg, a former aide to Sen. Ed Kennedy (D-Mass.), who co-founded the company. Federal filings state that CooperSurgical has not previously registered to lobby. Beasley met with Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra on Tuesday to talk about the turmoil and uncertainty caused by the Alabama Supreme Court decision that threatens IVF, as well as other individuals impacted by the decision. It caused many people's reproductive treatments to come to an abrupt halt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Balancing profit and patient welfare<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Every woman present at the discussion discussed the intense psychological stress and loneliness associated with receiving reproductive therapy. The epidemic had already caused some of them to have their reproductive treatments interrupted, only for the Supreme Court's ruling to throw them off course once again. According to fertility patient and nurse practitioner Kendall Diebold, \"the IVF world as a whole is so isolating and lonely.\" \"And all of that has really been taken by this, and it has just been magnified and filled with sadness, grief, and anger.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Internal medicine specialist Dr. Rachel Charles, who also has lupus, talked about the rigorous treatment plan she had to follow in order to do IVF and get ready for an embryo transfer. Rather than move on with an embryo transfer, she made the decision in February to take a break from the daily hormone injections. In a previous interview, Rebecca Mathews, 36, who is the mother of two IVF-conceived children, told The 19th that she was shocked and angry at the same time when she learned of the decision. She still has a frozen embryo and is unsure of what to do with it.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating legal turmoil: IVF company registers to lobby Washington","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-legal-turmoil-ivf-company-registers-to-lobby-washington","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6902","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6871,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_date_gmt":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_content":"\n

The Biden administration<\/a> remained dedicated to its alliances in the strategically significant Indo-Pacific area, one day after a US$95 billion <\/a>foreign assistance package omitted economic help pledged for the region as the US strives to counter China's influence there. We at the White House<\/a> and State Department are still in favor of funding authorization and appropriation. Deputy assistant secretary Camille Dawson of the US State Department stated, \"We feel it's critically important to continue working in close concert and in support of the freely associated states<\/a>,\" referring to the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau. Dawson said this in answer to a query from the Post at a press conference on the second anniversary of US President Joe Biden's Indo-Pacific Strategy announcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Navigating a Strategic Landscape<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The agreement is viewed as critical to Washington's efforts to sustain<\/a> its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken once declared that \"our planet's future will be written,\" despite growing concerns<\/a> about what some have called Beijing's coercive influence campaign.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That tactic may have its roots in the Compact of Free Association (Cofa), an agreement<\/a> that has guided US relations with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau for many years. First signed in 1986, the Cofa accord provides financial help and a legal framework<\/a> allowing its residents to live, work, and attend school in the United States in exchange for the US military having access to the land, air, and sea of the three Pacific island<\/a> nations. While Palau's Cofa program is scheduled to expire in September, that of the Marshall Islands and Micronesia expired on September 30. Last year, new agreements were established and extended, and Biden promised the three nations US$7.1 billion<\/a> spread over 20 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

According to Cornyn, China presents a special difficulty. He remarked, \"The Chinese are unique in that they are forced to share information with the PLA and with their intelligence agencies; they do not have a true solely private sector.\" Thus, I would suggest that there should always be care when working with Chinese-owned businesses. The LDA, which mandates disclosure of domestic lobbying, and the FARA, which mandates disclosure of lobbying and other kinds of influence by foreign governments and political parties, control lobbying in the United States. But in 1995, FARA was changed to exclude people or firms representing foreigners if their activity isn't meant to help a foreign government or political party. Lobbyists consequently registered under the far less transparent LDA, which led to a sharp decline in FARA registrations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbyists navigate complex legal and ethical terrain<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The U.S. Department of Defense released the 1260H list, a list of \"Chinese military companies\" that operate directly or indirectly in the United States, in late January. This move prompted efforts to increase the inspection of China's lobbying operations. After that, lawmakers said that they were thinking of passing a bill that would make it illegal for lobbyists representing businesses on the list to meet with members of Congress, not even to address issues on behalf of their American clients. A chart that listed several Chinese enterprises, including some military firms, along with the names of their lobbying firms and whether or not they were included on the 1260H list started to circulate on Capitol Hill after the 1260H list was released. According to Robert Sutter, a professor of international affairs practice at George Washington University's Elliott School, Chinese military organizations' lobbying operations have traditionally been vague, and enforcement has been lax.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rising concerns over reputation and risk<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

As of late February, at least five American lobbying companies had lost Chinese business. Steptoe LLP and BGI, a Shenzhen biotech company, have ended their business relationship. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld ended its partnership with Xiaomi, a Chinese electronics business not on the 1260H list, and filed cease-and-desist filings to halt advocating for Hesai Group, a Chinese manufacturer of LiDARs. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Additionally, the Vogel Group has ceased lobbying on behalf of Complete Genomics, a division of BGI, a genetic technology business, and DJI, a Chinese drone manufacturer. Hesai and DJI are both included in the 1260H list. While its former parent firm, BGI, is on the list, Complete Genomics is not. While it is challenging to enact legislation that forbids Congressmen from meeting with anybody, Republican Senator Marco Rubio told VOA that certain congressional offices have made the decision to forgo meetings with lobbying firms that represent Chinese defense businesses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Chinese business lobbying in Washington was virtually nonexistent until a few years ago, according to Craig Singleton, a senior researcher at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, but that all changed when the US government started pursuing Huawei. According to Singleton, there is room for improvement in the Department of Justice's involvement in limiting the CCP's negative lobbying effect on Capitol Hill. The Department of Justice is in charge of implementing and upholding FARA.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US lobbyists reevaluate ties: Shedding Chinese clients amid heightened oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-lobbyists-reevaluate-ties-shedding-chinese-clients-amid-heightened-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6913","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6902,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_content":"\n

After an Alabama judge deemed frozen embryos to be children, Democrats attempted in vain to ram legislation through the U.S. Senate that would have guaranteed Americans' access to IVF and other assisted reproductive technologies. At least three Alabama IVF clinics stopped doing IVF, which combines eggs and sperm in a lab dish for infertile couples, after the state Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos should be treated like children. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Challenges in the courtroom<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Because nonviable embryos are occasionally discarded or utilized for research, the Alabama court's decision has sparked worries that anyone participating in IVF may be prosecuted, and that it may also inspire other states to take similar legal action. Sen. Tammy Duckworth<\/a>, a Democrat and veteran of the Iraq War who was seriously injured in battle in 2004; she requested that the Senate take up her \"Access to Family Building Act\" legislation right now. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Alabama Supreme Court's decision last month that frozen embryos were lawfully regarded infants sparked fresh requests for federal safeguards for reproductive therapies, which led to the IVF business CooperSurgical filing. The decision, which caused some clinics in Alabama to stop IVF procedures, has set up a nationwide IVF firestorm. As the election draws near, Democrats are hammering Republicans on the matter, while the GOP is rushing to take positions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbying in Washington<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Thorn Run Partners, a Washington-based company licensed to effectively advocate on \"Fertility\" and \"Maternal Health,\" was engaged by CooperSurgical. This week, lawmakers in Alabama's Republican-controlled legislature passed a bill to safeguard IVF procedures. However, conservatives swiftly prevented the Senate from adopting the first federal policy. The Alabama Wrongful Death of a Minor Act made the destruction of embryos illegal, according to the court's ruling in that state's case. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Families alleging CooperSurgical caused the loss of their embryos are suing the corporation for undisclosed damages in many jurisdictions over identical allegations. CooperSurgical representative Adeena Fried responded, \"The company wanted to see that IVF remains accessible nationwide,\" when questioned about the choice to lobby. \"Our goal is to guarantee that the greatest goods and innovations can be utilized in Alabama and throughout the country to strengthen families and welcome new members into the world,\" the spokesperson stated. \"As of right now, a lot of clinics in Alabama are closed, and legislation nationwide needs to support the entire fertility industry.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The role of lobbying in reproductive technology<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In a similar vein, GenBioPro, a different reproductive health care firm, which manufactures mifepristone generically, approached Washington following a siege of their product. In 2022, a lobbying firm filed to represent the company, and the following year, GenBioPro filed a lawsuit against the FDA to maintain the drug's availability. CooperSurgical, a Connecticut-based corporation, recruited three seasoned Hill staffers, one of which was Jessie Brairton, a former Eli Lilly lobbyist and staff member of Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas). The other two lobbyists are Jacky Usyk, a veteran Democratic Senate assistant, and Andrew Rosenberg, a former aide to Sen. Ed Kennedy (D-Mass.), who co-founded the company. Federal filings state that CooperSurgical has not previously registered to lobby. Beasley met with Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra on Tuesday to talk about the turmoil and uncertainty caused by the Alabama Supreme Court decision that threatens IVF, as well as other individuals impacted by the decision. It caused many people's reproductive treatments to come to an abrupt halt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Balancing profit and patient welfare<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Every woman present at the discussion discussed the intense psychological stress and loneliness associated with receiving reproductive therapy. The epidemic had already caused some of them to have their reproductive treatments interrupted, only for the Supreme Court's ruling to throw them off course once again. According to fertility patient and nurse practitioner Kendall Diebold, \"the IVF world as a whole is so isolating and lonely.\" \"And all of that has really been taken by this, and it has just been magnified and filled with sadness, grief, and anger.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Internal medicine specialist Dr. Rachel Charles, who also has lupus, talked about the rigorous treatment plan she had to follow in order to do IVF and get ready for an embryo transfer. Rather than move on with an embryo transfer, she made the decision in February to take a break from the daily hormone injections. In a previous interview, Rebecca Mathews, 36, who is the mother of two IVF-conceived children, told The 19th that she was shocked and angry at the same time when she learned of the decision. She still has a frozen embryo and is unsure of what to do with it.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating legal turmoil: IVF company registers to lobby Washington","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-legal-turmoil-ivf-company-registers-to-lobby-washington","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6902","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6871,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_date_gmt":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_content":"\n

The Biden administration<\/a> remained dedicated to its alliances in the strategically significant Indo-Pacific area, one day after a US$95 billion <\/a>foreign assistance package omitted economic help pledged for the region as the US strives to counter China's influence there. We at the White House<\/a> and State Department are still in favor of funding authorization and appropriation. Deputy assistant secretary Camille Dawson of the US State Department stated, \"We feel it's critically important to continue working in close concert and in support of the freely associated states<\/a>,\" referring to the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau. Dawson said this in answer to a query from the Post at a press conference on the second anniversary of US President Joe Biden's Indo-Pacific Strategy announcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Navigating a Strategic Landscape<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The agreement is viewed as critical to Washington's efforts to sustain<\/a> its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken once declared that \"our planet's future will be written,\" despite growing concerns<\/a> about what some have called Beijing's coercive influence campaign.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That tactic may have its roots in the Compact of Free Association (Cofa), an agreement<\/a> that has guided US relations with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau for many years. First signed in 1986, the Cofa accord provides financial help and a legal framework<\/a> allowing its residents to live, work, and attend school in the United States in exchange for the US military having access to the land, air, and sea of the three Pacific island<\/a> nations. While Palau's Cofa program is scheduled to expire in September, that of the Marshall Islands and Micronesia expired on September 30. Last year, new agreements were established and extended, and Biden promised the three nations US$7.1 billion<\/a> spread over 20 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Scrutiny intensifies on lobbying practices<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

According to Cornyn, China presents a special difficulty. He remarked, \"The Chinese are unique in that they are forced to share information with the PLA and with their intelligence agencies; they do not have a true solely private sector.\" Thus, I would suggest that there should always be care when working with Chinese-owned businesses. The LDA, which mandates disclosure of domestic lobbying, and the FARA, which mandates disclosure of lobbying and other kinds of influence by foreign governments and political parties, control lobbying in the United States. But in 1995, FARA was changed to exclude people or firms representing foreigners if their activity isn't meant to help a foreign government or political party. Lobbyists consequently registered under the far less transparent LDA, which led to a sharp decline in FARA registrations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbyists navigate complex legal and ethical terrain<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The U.S. Department of Defense released the 1260H list, a list of \"Chinese military companies\" that operate directly or indirectly in the United States, in late January. This move prompted efforts to increase the inspection of China's lobbying operations. After that, lawmakers said that they were thinking of passing a bill that would make it illegal for lobbyists representing businesses on the list to meet with members of Congress, not even to address issues on behalf of their American clients. A chart that listed several Chinese enterprises, including some military firms, along with the names of their lobbying firms and whether or not they were included on the 1260H list started to circulate on Capitol Hill after the 1260H list was released. According to Robert Sutter, a professor of international affairs practice at George Washington University's Elliott School, Chinese military organizations' lobbying operations have traditionally been vague, and enforcement has been lax.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rising concerns over reputation and risk<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

As of late February, at least five American lobbying companies had lost Chinese business. Steptoe LLP and BGI, a Shenzhen biotech company, have ended their business relationship. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld ended its partnership with Xiaomi, a Chinese electronics business not on the 1260H list, and filed cease-and-desist filings to halt advocating for Hesai Group, a Chinese manufacturer of LiDARs. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Additionally, the Vogel Group has ceased lobbying on behalf of Complete Genomics, a division of BGI, a genetic technology business, and DJI, a Chinese drone manufacturer. Hesai and DJI are both included in the 1260H list. While its former parent firm, BGI, is on the list, Complete Genomics is not. While it is challenging to enact legislation that forbids Congressmen from meeting with anybody, Republican Senator Marco Rubio told VOA that certain congressional offices have made the decision to forgo meetings with lobbying firms that represent Chinese defense businesses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Chinese business lobbying in Washington was virtually nonexistent until a few years ago, according to Craig Singleton, a senior researcher at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, but that all changed when the US government started pursuing Huawei. According to Singleton, there is room for improvement in the Department of Justice's involvement in limiting the CCP's negative lobbying effect on Capitol Hill. The Department of Justice is in charge of implementing and upholding FARA.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US lobbyists reevaluate ties: Shedding Chinese clients amid heightened oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-lobbyists-reevaluate-ties-shedding-chinese-clients-amid-heightened-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6913","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6902,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_content":"\n

After an Alabama judge deemed frozen embryos to be children, Democrats attempted in vain to ram legislation through the U.S. Senate that would have guaranteed Americans' access to IVF and other assisted reproductive technologies. At least three Alabama IVF clinics stopped doing IVF, which combines eggs and sperm in a lab dish for infertile couples, after the state Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos should be treated like children. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Challenges in the courtroom<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Because nonviable embryos are occasionally discarded or utilized for research, the Alabama court's decision has sparked worries that anyone participating in IVF may be prosecuted, and that it may also inspire other states to take similar legal action. Sen. Tammy Duckworth<\/a>, a Democrat and veteran of the Iraq War who was seriously injured in battle in 2004; she requested that the Senate take up her \"Access to Family Building Act\" legislation right now. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Alabama Supreme Court's decision last month that frozen embryos were lawfully regarded infants sparked fresh requests for federal safeguards for reproductive therapies, which led to the IVF business CooperSurgical filing. The decision, which caused some clinics in Alabama to stop IVF procedures, has set up a nationwide IVF firestorm. As the election draws near, Democrats are hammering Republicans on the matter, while the GOP is rushing to take positions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbying in Washington<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Thorn Run Partners, a Washington-based company licensed to effectively advocate on \"Fertility\" and \"Maternal Health,\" was engaged by CooperSurgical. This week, lawmakers in Alabama's Republican-controlled legislature passed a bill to safeguard IVF procedures. However, conservatives swiftly prevented the Senate from adopting the first federal policy. The Alabama Wrongful Death of a Minor Act made the destruction of embryos illegal, according to the court's ruling in that state's case. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Families alleging CooperSurgical caused the loss of their embryos are suing the corporation for undisclosed damages in many jurisdictions over identical allegations. CooperSurgical representative Adeena Fried responded, \"The company wanted to see that IVF remains accessible nationwide,\" when questioned about the choice to lobby. \"Our goal is to guarantee that the greatest goods and innovations can be utilized in Alabama and throughout the country to strengthen families and welcome new members into the world,\" the spokesperson stated. \"As of right now, a lot of clinics in Alabama are closed, and legislation nationwide needs to support the entire fertility industry.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The role of lobbying in reproductive technology<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In a similar vein, GenBioPro, a different reproductive health care firm, which manufactures mifepristone generically, approached Washington following a siege of their product. In 2022, a lobbying firm filed to represent the company, and the following year, GenBioPro filed a lawsuit against the FDA to maintain the drug's availability. CooperSurgical, a Connecticut-based corporation, recruited three seasoned Hill staffers, one of which was Jessie Brairton, a former Eli Lilly lobbyist and staff member of Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas). The other two lobbyists are Jacky Usyk, a veteran Democratic Senate assistant, and Andrew Rosenberg, a former aide to Sen. Ed Kennedy (D-Mass.), who co-founded the company. Federal filings state that CooperSurgical has not previously registered to lobby. Beasley met with Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra on Tuesday to talk about the turmoil and uncertainty caused by the Alabama Supreme Court decision that threatens IVF, as well as other individuals impacted by the decision. It caused many people's reproductive treatments to come to an abrupt halt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Balancing profit and patient welfare<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Every woman present at the discussion discussed the intense psychological stress and loneliness associated with receiving reproductive therapy. The epidemic had already caused some of them to have their reproductive treatments interrupted, only for the Supreme Court's ruling to throw them off course once again. According to fertility patient and nurse practitioner Kendall Diebold, \"the IVF world as a whole is so isolating and lonely.\" \"And all of that has really been taken by this, and it has just been magnified and filled with sadness, grief, and anger.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Internal medicine specialist Dr. Rachel Charles, who also has lupus, talked about the rigorous treatment plan she had to follow in order to do IVF and get ready for an embryo transfer. Rather than move on with an embryo transfer, she made the decision in February to take a break from the daily hormone injections. In a previous interview, Rebecca Mathews, 36, who is the mother of two IVF-conceived children, told The 19th that she was shocked and angry at the same time when she learned of the decision. She still has a frozen embryo and is unsure of what to do with it.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating legal turmoil: IVF company registers to lobby Washington","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-legal-turmoil-ivf-company-registers-to-lobby-washington","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6902","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6871,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_date_gmt":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_content":"\n

The Biden administration<\/a> remained dedicated to its alliances in the strategically significant Indo-Pacific area, one day after a US$95 billion <\/a>foreign assistance package omitted economic help pledged for the region as the US strives to counter China's influence there. We at the White House<\/a> and State Department are still in favor of funding authorization and appropriation. Deputy assistant secretary Camille Dawson of the US State Department stated, \"We feel it's critically important to continue working in close concert and in support of the freely associated states<\/a>,\" referring to the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau. Dawson said this in answer to a query from the Post at a press conference on the second anniversary of US President Joe Biden's Indo-Pacific Strategy announcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Navigating a Strategic Landscape<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The agreement is viewed as critical to Washington's efforts to sustain<\/a> its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken once declared that \"our planet's future will be written,\" despite growing concerns<\/a> about what some have called Beijing's coercive influence campaign.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That tactic may have its roots in the Compact of Free Association (Cofa), an agreement<\/a> that has guided US relations with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau for many years. First signed in 1986, the Cofa accord provides financial help and a legal framework<\/a> allowing its residents to live, work, and attend school in the United States in exchange for the US military having access to the land, air, and sea of the three Pacific island<\/a> nations. While Palau's Cofa program is scheduled to expire in September, that of the Marshall Islands and Micronesia expired on September 30. Last year, new agreements were established and extended, and Biden promised the three nations US$7.1 billion<\/a> spread over 20 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

\"Although there has been some opposition, we will keep working because it's critical to know who is genuinely influencing these legislators,\" Cornyn stated. Ensuring that individuals register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act has been the main priority. As you are aware, there have been several issues raised by persons failing to declare their lobbying agreements with foreign governments. Legislators are attempting to enact legislation that would close loopholes in the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 (LDA) and the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938 (FARA) in order to require greater transparency regarding foreign governments and political parties that engage in the organization, management, control, or supervision of lobbying efforts, whether or not they have received financial contributions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Scrutiny intensifies on lobbying practices<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

According to Cornyn, China presents a special difficulty. He remarked, \"The Chinese are unique in that they are forced to share information with the PLA and with their intelligence agencies; they do not have a true solely private sector.\" Thus, I would suggest that there should always be care when working with Chinese-owned businesses. The LDA, which mandates disclosure of domestic lobbying, and the FARA, which mandates disclosure of lobbying and other kinds of influence by foreign governments and political parties, control lobbying in the United States. But in 1995, FARA was changed to exclude people or firms representing foreigners if their activity isn't meant to help a foreign government or political party. Lobbyists consequently registered under the far less transparent LDA, which led to a sharp decline in FARA registrations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbyists navigate complex legal and ethical terrain<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The U.S. Department of Defense released the 1260H list, a list of \"Chinese military companies\" that operate directly or indirectly in the United States, in late January. This move prompted efforts to increase the inspection of China's lobbying operations. After that, lawmakers said that they were thinking of passing a bill that would make it illegal for lobbyists representing businesses on the list to meet with members of Congress, not even to address issues on behalf of their American clients. A chart that listed several Chinese enterprises, including some military firms, along with the names of their lobbying firms and whether or not they were included on the 1260H list started to circulate on Capitol Hill after the 1260H list was released. According to Robert Sutter, a professor of international affairs practice at George Washington University's Elliott School, Chinese military organizations' lobbying operations have traditionally been vague, and enforcement has been lax.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rising concerns over reputation and risk<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

As of late February, at least five American lobbying companies had lost Chinese business. Steptoe LLP and BGI, a Shenzhen biotech company, have ended their business relationship. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld ended its partnership with Xiaomi, a Chinese electronics business not on the 1260H list, and filed cease-and-desist filings to halt advocating for Hesai Group, a Chinese manufacturer of LiDARs. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Additionally, the Vogel Group has ceased lobbying on behalf of Complete Genomics, a division of BGI, a genetic technology business, and DJI, a Chinese drone manufacturer. Hesai and DJI are both included in the 1260H list. While its former parent firm, BGI, is on the list, Complete Genomics is not. While it is challenging to enact legislation that forbids Congressmen from meeting with anybody, Republican Senator Marco Rubio told VOA that certain congressional offices have made the decision to forgo meetings with lobbying firms that represent Chinese defense businesses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Chinese business lobbying in Washington was virtually nonexistent until a few years ago, according to Craig Singleton, a senior researcher at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, but that all changed when the US government started pursuing Huawei. According to Singleton, there is room for improvement in the Department of Justice's involvement in limiting the CCP's negative lobbying effect on Capitol Hill. The Department of Justice is in charge of implementing and upholding FARA.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US lobbyists reevaluate ties: Shedding Chinese clients amid heightened oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-lobbyists-reevaluate-ties-shedding-chinese-clients-amid-heightened-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6913","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6902,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_content":"\n

After an Alabama judge deemed frozen embryos to be children, Democrats attempted in vain to ram legislation through the U.S. Senate that would have guaranteed Americans' access to IVF and other assisted reproductive technologies. At least three Alabama IVF clinics stopped doing IVF, which combines eggs and sperm in a lab dish for infertile couples, after the state Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos should be treated like children. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Challenges in the courtroom<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Because nonviable embryos are occasionally discarded or utilized for research, the Alabama court's decision has sparked worries that anyone participating in IVF may be prosecuted, and that it may also inspire other states to take similar legal action. Sen. Tammy Duckworth<\/a>, a Democrat and veteran of the Iraq War who was seriously injured in battle in 2004; she requested that the Senate take up her \"Access to Family Building Act\" legislation right now. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Alabama Supreme Court's decision last month that frozen embryos were lawfully regarded infants sparked fresh requests for federal safeguards for reproductive therapies, which led to the IVF business CooperSurgical filing. The decision, which caused some clinics in Alabama to stop IVF procedures, has set up a nationwide IVF firestorm. As the election draws near, Democrats are hammering Republicans on the matter, while the GOP is rushing to take positions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbying in Washington<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Thorn Run Partners, a Washington-based company licensed to effectively advocate on \"Fertility\" and \"Maternal Health,\" was engaged by CooperSurgical. This week, lawmakers in Alabama's Republican-controlled legislature passed a bill to safeguard IVF procedures. However, conservatives swiftly prevented the Senate from adopting the first federal policy. The Alabama Wrongful Death of a Minor Act made the destruction of embryos illegal, according to the court's ruling in that state's case. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Families alleging CooperSurgical caused the loss of their embryos are suing the corporation for undisclosed damages in many jurisdictions over identical allegations. CooperSurgical representative Adeena Fried responded, \"The company wanted to see that IVF remains accessible nationwide,\" when questioned about the choice to lobby. \"Our goal is to guarantee that the greatest goods and innovations can be utilized in Alabama and throughout the country to strengthen families and welcome new members into the world,\" the spokesperson stated. \"As of right now, a lot of clinics in Alabama are closed, and legislation nationwide needs to support the entire fertility industry.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The role of lobbying in reproductive technology<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In a similar vein, GenBioPro, a different reproductive health care firm, which manufactures mifepristone generically, approached Washington following a siege of their product. In 2022, a lobbying firm filed to represent the company, and the following year, GenBioPro filed a lawsuit against the FDA to maintain the drug's availability. CooperSurgical, a Connecticut-based corporation, recruited three seasoned Hill staffers, one of which was Jessie Brairton, a former Eli Lilly lobbyist and staff member of Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas). The other two lobbyists are Jacky Usyk, a veteran Democratic Senate assistant, and Andrew Rosenberg, a former aide to Sen. Ed Kennedy (D-Mass.), who co-founded the company. Federal filings state that CooperSurgical has not previously registered to lobby. Beasley met with Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra on Tuesday to talk about the turmoil and uncertainty caused by the Alabama Supreme Court decision that threatens IVF, as well as other individuals impacted by the decision. It caused many people's reproductive treatments to come to an abrupt halt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Balancing profit and patient welfare<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Every woman present at the discussion discussed the intense psychological stress and loneliness associated with receiving reproductive therapy. The epidemic had already caused some of them to have their reproductive treatments interrupted, only for the Supreme Court's ruling to throw them off course once again. According to fertility patient and nurse practitioner Kendall Diebold, \"the IVF world as a whole is so isolating and lonely.\" \"And all of that has really been taken by this, and it has just been magnified and filled with sadness, grief, and anger.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Internal medicine specialist Dr. Rachel Charles, who also has lupus, talked about the rigorous treatment plan she had to follow in order to do IVF and get ready for an embryo transfer. Rather than move on with an embryo transfer, she made the decision in February to take a break from the daily hormone injections. In a previous interview, Rebecca Mathews, 36, who is the mother of two IVF-conceived children, told The 19th that she was shocked and angry at the same time when she learned of the decision. She still has a frozen embryo and is unsure of what to do with it.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating legal turmoil: IVF company registers to lobby Washington","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-legal-turmoil-ivf-company-registers-to-lobby-washington","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6902","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6871,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_date_gmt":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_content":"\n

The Biden administration<\/a> remained dedicated to its alliances in the strategically significant Indo-Pacific area, one day after a US$95 billion <\/a>foreign assistance package omitted economic help pledged for the region as the US strives to counter China's influence there. We at the White House<\/a> and State Department are still in favor of funding authorization and appropriation. Deputy assistant secretary Camille Dawson of the US State Department stated, \"We feel it's critically important to continue working in close concert and in support of the freely associated states<\/a>,\" referring to the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau. Dawson said this in answer to a query from the Post at a press conference on the second anniversary of US President Joe Biden's Indo-Pacific Strategy announcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Navigating a Strategic Landscape<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The agreement is viewed as critical to Washington's efforts to sustain<\/a> its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken once declared that \"our planet's future will be written,\" despite growing concerns<\/a> about what some have called Beijing's coercive influence campaign.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That tactic may have its roots in the Compact of Free Association (Cofa), an agreement<\/a> that has guided US relations with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau for many years. First signed in 1986, the Cofa accord provides financial help and a legal framework<\/a> allowing its residents to live, work, and attend school in the United States in exchange for the US military having access to the land, air, and sea of the three Pacific island<\/a> nations. While Palau's Cofa program is scheduled to expire in September, that of the Marshall Islands and Micronesia expired on September 30. Last year, new agreements were established and extended, and Biden promised the three nations US$7.1 billion<\/a> spread over 20 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

The evolving landscape of US-China relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

\"Although there has been some opposition, we will keep working because it's critical to know who is genuinely influencing these legislators,\" Cornyn stated. Ensuring that individuals register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act has been the main priority. As you are aware, there have been several issues raised by persons failing to declare their lobbying agreements with foreign governments. Legislators are attempting to enact legislation that would close loopholes in the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 (LDA) and the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938 (FARA) in order to require greater transparency regarding foreign governments and political parties that engage in the organization, management, control, or supervision of lobbying efforts, whether or not they have received financial contributions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Scrutiny intensifies on lobbying practices<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

According to Cornyn, China presents a special difficulty. He remarked, \"The Chinese are unique in that they are forced to share information with the PLA and with their intelligence agencies; they do not have a true solely private sector.\" Thus, I would suggest that there should always be care when working with Chinese-owned businesses. The LDA, which mandates disclosure of domestic lobbying, and the FARA, which mandates disclosure of lobbying and other kinds of influence by foreign governments and political parties, control lobbying in the United States. But in 1995, FARA was changed to exclude people or firms representing foreigners if their activity isn't meant to help a foreign government or political party. Lobbyists consequently registered under the far less transparent LDA, which led to a sharp decline in FARA registrations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbyists navigate complex legal and ethical terrain<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The U.S. Department of Defense released the 1260H list, a list of \"Chinese military companies\" that operate directly or indirectly in the United States, in late January. This move prompted efforts to increase the inspection of China's lobbying operations. After that, lawmakers said that they were thinking of passing a bill that would make it illegal for lobbyists representing businesses on the list to meet with members of Congress, not even to address issues on behalf of their American clients. A chart that listed several Chinese enterprises, including some military firms, along with the names of their lobbying firms and whether or not they were included on the 1260H list started to circulate on Capitol Hill after the 1260H list was released. According to Robert Sutter, a professor of international affairs practice at George Washington University's Elliott School, Chinese military organizations' lobbying operations have traditionally been vague, and enforcement has been lax.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rising concerns over reputation and risk<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

As of late February, at least five American lobbying companies had lost Chinese business. Steptoe LLP and BGI, a Shenzhen biotech company, have ended their business relationship. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld ended its partnership with Xiaomi, a Chinese electronics business not on the 1260H list, and filed cease-and-desist filings to halt advocating for Hesai Group, a Chinese manufacturer of LiDARs. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Additionally, the Vogel Group has ceased lobbying on behalf of Complete Genomics, a division of BGI, a genetic technology business, and DJI, a Chinese drone manufacturer. Hesai and DJI are both included in the 1260H list. While its former parent firm, BGI, is on the list, Complete Genomics is not. While it is challenging to enact legislation that forbids Congressmen from meeting with anybody, Republican Senator Marco Rubio told VOA that certain congressional offices have made the decision to forgo meetings with lobbying firms that represent Chinese defense businesses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Chinese business lobbying in Washington was virtually nonexistent until a few years ago, according to Craig Singleton, a senior researcher at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, but that all changed when the US government started pursuing Huawei. According to Singleton, there is room for improvement in the Department of Justice's involvement in limiting the CCP's negative lobbying effect on Capitol Hill. The Department of Justice is in charge of implementing and upholding FARA.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US lobbyists reevaluate ties: Shedding Chinese clients amid heightened oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-lobbyists-reevaluate-ties-shedding-chinese-clients-amid-heightened-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6913","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6902,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_content":"\n

After an Alabama judge deemed frozen embryos to be children, Democrats attempted in vain to ram legislation through the U.S. Senate that would have guaranteed Americans' access to IVF and other assisted reproductive technologies. At least three Alabama IVF clinics stopped doing IVF, which combines eggs and sperm in a lab dish for infertile couples, after the state Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos should be treated like children. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Challenges in the courtroom<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Because nonviable embryos are occasionally discarded or utilized for research, the Alabama court's decision has sparked worries that anyone participating in IVF may be prosecuted, and that it may also inspire other states to take similar legal action. Sen. Tammy Duckworth<\/a>, a Democrat and veteran of the Iraq War who was seriously injured in battle in 2004; she requested that the Senate take up her \"Access to Family Building Act\" legislation right now. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Alabama Supreme Court's decision last month that frozen embryos were lawfully regarded infants sparked fresh requests for federal safeguards for reproductive therapies, which led to the IVF business CooperSurgical filing. The decision, which caused some clinics in Alabama to stop IVF procedures, has set up a nationwide IVF firestorm. As the election draws near, Democrats are hammering Republicans on the matter, while the GOP is rushing to take positions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbying in Washington<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Thorn Run Partners, a Washington-based company licensed to effectively advocate on \"Fertility\" and \"Maternal Health,\" was engaged by CooperSurgical. This week, lawmakers in Alabama's Republican-controlled legislature passed a bill to safeguard IVF procedures. However, conservatives swiftly prevented the Senate from adopting the first federal policy. The Alabama Wrongful Death of a Minor Act made the destruction of embryos illegal, according to the court's ruling in that state's case. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Families alleging CooperSurgical caused the loss of their embryos are suing the corporation for undisclosed damages in many jurisdictions over identical allegations. CooperSurgical representative Adeena Fried responded, \"The company wanted to see that IVF remains accessible nationwide,\" when questioned about the choice to lobby. \"Our goal is to guarantee that the greatest goods and innovations can be utilized in Alabama and throughout the country to strengthen families and welcome new members into the world,\" the spokesperson stated. \"As of right now, a lot of clinics in Alabama are closed, and legislation nationwide needs to support the entire fertility industry.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The role of lobbying in reproductive technology<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In a similar vein, GenBioPro, a different reproductive health care firm, which manufactures mifepristone generically, approached Washington following a siege of their product. In 2022, a lobbying firm filed to represent the company, and the following year, GenBioPro filed a lawsuit against the FDA to maintain the drug's availability. CooperSurgical, a Connecticut-based corporation, recruited three seasoned Hill staffers, one of which was Jessie Brairton, a former Eli Lilly lobbyist and staff member of Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas). The other two lobbyists are Jacky Usyk, a veteran Democratic Senate assistant, and Andrew Rosenberg, a former aide to Sen. Ed Kennedy (D-Mass.), who co-founded the company. Federal filings state that CooperSurgical has not previously registered to lobby. Beasley met with Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra on Tuesday to talk about the turmoil and uncertainty caused by the Alabama Supreme Court decision that threatens IVF, as well as other individuals impacted by the decision. It caused many people's reproductive treatments to come to an abrupt halt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Balancing profit and patient welfare<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Every woman present at the discussion discussed the intense psychological stress and loneliness associated with receiving reproductive therapy. The epidemic had already caused some of them to have their reproductive treatments interrupted, only for the Supreme Court's ruling to throw them off course once again. According to fertility patient and nurse practitioner Kendall Diebold, \"the IVF world as a whole is so isolating and lonely.\" \"And all of that has really been taken by this, and it has just been magnified and filled with sadness, grief, and anger.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Internal medicine specialist Dr. Rachel Charles, who also has lupus, talked about the rigorous treatment plan she had to follow in order to do IVF and get ready for an embryo transfer. Rather than move on with an embryo transfer, she made the decision in February to take a break from the daily hormone injections. In a previous interview, Rebecca Mathews, 36, who is the mother of two IVF-conceived children, told The 19th that she was shocked and angry at the same time when she learned of the decision. She still has a frozen embryo and is unsure of what to do with it.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating legal turmoil: IVF company registers to lobby Washington","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-legal-turmoil-ivf-company-registers-to-lobby-washington","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6902","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6871,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_date_gmt":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_content":"\n

The Biden administration<\/a> remained dedicated to its alliances in the strategically significant Indo-Pacific area, one day after a US$95 billion <\/a>foreign assistance package omitted economic help pledged for the region as the US strives to counter China's influence there. We at the White House<\/a> and State Department are still in favor of funding authorization and appropriation. Deputy assistant secretary Camille Dawson of the US State Department stated, \"We feel it's critically important to continue working in close concert and in support of the freely associated states<\/a>,\" referring to the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau. Dawson said this in answer to a query from the Post at a press conference on the second anniversary of US President Joe Biden's Indo-Pacific Strategy announcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Navigating a Strategic Landscape<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The agreement is viewed as critical to Washington's efforts to sustain<\/a> its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken once declared that \"our planet's future will be written,\" despite growing concerns<\/a> about what some have called Beijing's coercive influence campaign.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That tactic may have its roots in the Compact of Free Association (Cofa), an agreement<\/a> that has guided US relations with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau for many years. First signed in 1986, the Cofa accord provides financial help and a legal framework<\/a> allowing its residents to live, work, and attend school in the United States in exchange for the US military having access to the land, air, and sea of the three Pacific island<\/a> nations. While Palau's Cofa program is scheduled to expire in September, that of the Marshall Islands and Micronesia expired on September 30. Last year, new agreements were established and extended, and Biden promised the three nations US$7.1 billion<\/a> spread over 20 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Legislators seeking to increase scrutiny are prompting lobbying companies in Washington to quickly withdraw their clients from China. The drive follows rising worries about China's influence and a recent spike in Chinese lobbying. The goal of legislators is to stop the People's Liberation Army (PLA) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)<\/a> from surreptitiously advancing agendas that undermine the interests of the American people by using legal loopholes. Senator John Cornyn, a Republican, told VOA's Mandarin Service that senators are almost done working on legislation that attempts to solve the issue. Members of the House have filed a bill to expose the exposing Foreign Influence in Lobbying Act, which was approved by the Senate last year. Cornyn co-sponsored the Senate legislation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The evolving landscape of US-China relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

\"Although there has been some opposition, we will keep working because it's critical to know who is genuinely influencing these legislators,\" Cornyn stated. Ensuring that individuals register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act has been the main priority. As you are aware, there have been several issues raised by persons failing to declare their lobbying agreements with foreign governments. Legislators are attempting to enact legislation that would close loopholes in the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 (LDA) and the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938 (FARA) in order to require greater transparency regarding foreign governments and political parties that engage in the organization, management, control, or supervision of lobbying efforts, whether or not they have received financial contributions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Scrutiny intensifies on lobbying practices<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

According to Cornyn, China presents a special difficulty. He remarked, \"The Chinese are unique in that they are forced to share information with the PLA and with their intelligence agencies; they do not have a true solely private sector.\" Thus, I would suggest that there should always be care when working with Chinese-owned businesses. The LDA, which mandates disclosure of domestic lobbying, and the FARA, which mandates disclosure of lobbying and other kinds of influence by foreign governments and political parties, control lobbying in the United States. But in 1995, FARA was changed to exclude people or firms representing foreigners if their activity isn't meant to help a foreign government or political party. Lobbyists consequently registered under the far less transparent LDA, which led to a sharp decline in FARA registrations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbyists navigate complex legal and ethical terrain<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The U.S. Department of Defense released the 1260H list, a list of \"Chinese military companies\" that operate directly or indirectly in the United States, in late January. This move prompted efforts to increase the inspection of China's lobbying operations. After that, lawmakers said that they were thinking of passing a bill that would make it illegal for lobbyists representing businesses on the list to meet with members of Congress, not even to address issues on behalf of their American clients. A chart that listed several Chinese enterprises, including some military firms, along with the names of their lobbying firms and whether or not they were included on the 1260H list started to circulate on Capitol Hill after the 1260H list was released. According to Robert Sutter, a professor of international affairs practice at George Washington University's Elliott School, Chinese military organizations' lobbying operations have traditionally been vague, and enforcement has been lax.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rising concerns over reputation and risk<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

As of late February, at least five American lobbying companies had lost Chinese business. Steptoe LLP and BGI, a Shenzhen biotech company, have ended their business relationship. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld ended its partnership with Xiaomi, a Chinese electronics business not on the 1260H list, and filed cease-and-desist filings to halt advocating for Hesai Group, a Chinese manufacturer of LiDARs. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Additionally, the Vogel Group has ceased lobbying on behalf of Complete Genomics, a division of BGI, a genetic technology business, and DJI, a Chinese drone manufacturer. Hesai and DJI are both included in the 1260H list. While its former parent firm, BGI, is on the list, Complete Genomics is not. While it is challenging to enact legislation that forbids Congressmen from meeting with anybody, Republican Senator Marco Rubio told VOA that certain congressional offices have made the decision to forgo meetings with lobbying firms that represent Chinese defense businesses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Chinese business lobbying in Washington was virtually nonexistent until a few years ago, according to Craig Singleton, a senior researcher at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, but that all changed when the US government started pursuing Huawei. According to Singleton, there is room for improvement in the Department of Justice's involvement in limiting the CCP's negative lobbying effect on Capitol Hill. The Department of Justice is in charge of implementing and upholding FARA.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US lobbyists reevaluate ties: Shedding Chinese clients amid heightened oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-lobbyists-reevaluate-ties-shedding-chinese-clients-amid-heightened-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6913","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6902,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_content":"\n

After an Alabama judge deemed frozen embryos to be children, Democrats attempted in vain to ram legislation through the U.S. Senate that would have guaranteed Americans' access to IVF and other assisted reproductive technologies. At least three Alabama IVF clinics stopped doing IVF, which combines eggs and sperm in a lab dish for infertile couples, after the state Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos should be treated like children. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Challenges in the courtroom<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Because nonviable embryos are occasionally discarded or utilized for research, the Alabama court's decision has sparked worries that anyone participating in IVF may be prosecuted, and that it may also inspire other states to take similar legal action. Sen. Tammy Duckworth<\/a>, a Democrat and veteran of the Iraq War who was seriously injured in battle in 2004; she requested that the Senate take up her \"Access to Family Building Act\" legislation right now. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Alabama Supreme Court's decision last month that frozen embryos were lawfully regarded infants sparked fresh requests for federal safeguards for reproductive therapies, which led to the IVF business CooperSurgical filing. The decision, which caused some clinics in Alabama to stop IVF procedures, has set up a nationwide IVF firestorm. As the election draws near, Democrats are hammering Republicans on the matter, while the GOP is rushing to take positions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbying in Washington<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Thorn Run Partners, a Washington-based company licensed to effectively advocate on \"Fertility\" and \"Maternal Health,\" was engaged by CooperSurgical. This week, lawmakers in Alabama's Republican-controlled legislature passed a bill to safeguard IVF procedures. However, conservatives swiftly prevented the Senate from adopting the first federal policy. The Alabama Wrongful Death of a Minor Act made the destruction of embryos illegal, according to the court's ruling in that state's case. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Families alleging CooperSurgical caused the loss of their embryos are suing the corporation for undisclosed damages in many jurisdictions over identical allegations. CooperSurgical representative Adeena Fried responded, \"The company wanted to see that IVF remains accessible nationwide,\" when questioned about the choice to lobby. \"Our goal is to guarantee that the greatest goods and innovations can be utilized in Alabama and throughout the country to strengthen families and welcome new members into the world,\" the spokesperson stated. \"As of right now, a lot of clinics in Alabama are closed, and legislation nationwide needs to support the entire fertility industry.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The role of lobbying in reproductive technology<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In a similar vein, GenBioPro, a different reproductive health care firm, which manufactures mifepristone generically, approached Washington following a siege of their product. In 2022, a lobbying firm filed to represent the company, and the following year, GenBioPro filed a lawsuit against the FDA to maintain the drug's availability. CooperSurgical, a Connecticut-based corporation, recruited three seasoned Hill staffers, one of which was Jessie Brairton, a former Eli Lilly lobbyist and staff member of Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas). The other two lobbyists are Jacky Usyk, a veteran Democratic Senate assistant, and Andrew Rosenberg, a former aide to Sen. Ed Kennedy (D-Mass.), who co-founded the company. Federal filings state that CooperSurgical has not previously registered to lobby. Beasley met with Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra on Tuesday to talk about the turmoil and uncertainty caused by the Alabama Supreme Court decision that threatens IVF, as well as other individuals impacted by the decision. It caused many people's reproductive treatments to come to an abrupt halt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Balancing profit and patient welfare<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Every woman present at the discussion discussed the intense psychological stress and loneliness associated with receiving reproductive therapy. The epidemic had already caused some of them to have their reproductive treatments interrupted, only for the Supreme Court's ruling to throw them off course once again. According to fertility patient and nurse practitioner Kendall Diebold, \"the IVF world as a whole is so isolating and lonely.\" \"And all of that has really been taken by this, and it has just been magnified and filled with sadness, grief, and anger.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Internal medicine specialist Dr. Rachel Charles, who also has lupus, talked about the rigorous treatment plan she had to follow in order to do IVF and get ready for an embryo transfer. Rather than move on with an embryo transfer, she made the decision in February to take a break from the daily hormone injections. In a previous interview, Rebecca Mathews, 36, who is the mother of two IVF-conceived children, told The 19th that she was shocked and angry at the same time when she learned of the decision. She still has a frozen embryo and is unsure of what to do with it.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating legal turmoil: IVF company registers to lobby Washington","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-legal-turmoil-ivf-company-registers-to-lobby-washington","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6902","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6871,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_date_gmt":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_content":"\n

The Biden administration<\/a> remained dedicated to its alliances in the strategically significant Indo-Pacific area, one day after a US$95 billion <\/a>foreign assistance package omitted economic help pledged for the region as the US strives to counter China's influence there. We at the White House<\/a> and State Department are still in favor of funding authorization and appropriation. Deputy assistant secretary Camille Dawson of the US State Department stated, \"We feel it's critically important to continue working in close concert and in support of the freely associated states<\/a>,\" referring to the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau. Dawson said this in answer to a query from the Post at a press conference on the second anniversary of US President Joe Biden's Indo-Pacific Strategy announcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Navigating a Strategic Landscape<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The agreement is viewed as critical to Washington's efforts to sustain<\/a> its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken once declared that \"our planet's future will be written,\" despite growing concerns<\/a> about what some have called Beijing's coercive influence campaign.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That tactic may have its roots in the Compact of Free Association (Cofa), an agreement<\/a> that has guided US relations with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau for many years. First signed in 1986, the Cofa accord provides financial help and a legal framework<\/a> allowing its residents to live, work, and attend school in the United States in exchange for the US military having access to the land, air, and sea of the three Pacific island<\/a> nations. While Palau's Cofa program is scheduled to expire in September, that of the Marshall Islands and Micronesia expired on September 30. Last year, new agreements were established and extended, and Biden promised the three nations US$7.1 billion<\/a> spread over 20 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

In conclusion,  One may make a compelling argument for the TikTok Election 2024. Every month, almost 170 million Americans use the app. About one-third of US individuals under 30 and roughly 43% of TikTok users say they routinely obtain their news from the platform, which is twice as many as three years ago, according to the Pew Research Center.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Slow roll: The uncertain fate of a TikTok ban","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"slow-roll-the-uncertain-fate-of-a-tiktok-ban","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6916","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6913,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-13 18:13:25","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-13 18:13:25","post_content":"\n

Legislators seeking to increase scrutiny are prompting lobbying companies in Washington to quickly withdraw their clients from China. The drive follows rising worries about China's influence and a recent spike in Chinese lobbying. The goal of legislators is to stop the People's Liberation Army (PLA) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)<\/a> from surreptitiously advancing agendas that undermine the interests of the American people by using legal loopholes. Senator John Cornyn, a Republican, told VOA's Mandarin Service that senators are almost done working on legislation that attempts to solve the issue. Members of the House have filed a bill to expose the exposing Foreign Influence in Lobbying Act, which was approved by the Senate last year. Cornyn co-sponsored the Senate legislation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The evolving landscape of US-China relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

\"Although there has been some opposition, we will keep working because it's critical to know who is genuinely influencing these legislators,\" Cornyn stated. Ensuring that individuals register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act has been the main priority. As you are aware, there have been several issues raised by persons failing to declare their lobbying agreements with foreign governments. Legislators are attempting to enact legislation that would close loopholes in the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 (LDA) and the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938 (FARA) in order to require greater transparency regarding foreign governments and political parties that engage in the organization, management, control, or supervision of lobbying efforts, whether or not they have received financial contributions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Scrutiny intensifies on lobbying practices<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

According to Cornyn, China presents a special difficulty. He remarked, \"The Chinese are unique in that they are forced to share information with the PLA and with their intelligence agencies; they do not have a true solely private sector.\" Thus, I would suggest that there should always be care when working with Chinese-owned businesses. The LDA, which mandates disclosure of domestic lobbying, and the FARA, which mandates disclosure of lobbying and other kinds of influence by foreign governments and political parties, control lobbying in the United States. But in 1995, FARA was changed to exclude people or firms representing foreigners if their activity isn't meant to help a foreign government or political party. Lobbyists consequently registered under the far less transparent LDA, which led to a sharp decline in FARA registrations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbyists navigate complex legal and ethical terrain<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The U.S. Department of Defense released the 1260H list, a list of \"Chinese military companies\" that operate directly or indirectly in the United States, in late January. This move prompted efforts to increase the inspection of China's lobbying operations. After that, lawmakers said that they were thinking of passing a bill that would make it illegal for lobbyists representing businesses on the list to meet with members of Congress, not even to address issues on behalf of their American clients. A chart that listed several Chinese enterprises, including some military firms, along with the names of their lobbying firms and whether or not they were included on the 1260H list started to circulate on Capitol Hill after the 1260H list was released. According to Robert Sutter, a professor of international affairs practice at George Washington University's Elliott School, Chinese military organizations' lobbying operations have traditionally been vague, and enforcement has been lax.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rising concerns over reputation and risk<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

As of late February, at least five American lobbying companies had lost Chinese business. Steptoe LLP and BGI, a Shenzhen biotech company, have ended their business relationship. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld ended its partnership with Xiaomi, a Chinese electronics business not on the 1260H list, and filed cease-and-desist filings to halt advocating for Hesai Group, a Chinese manufacturer of LiDARs. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Additionally, the Vogel Group has ceased lobbying on behalf of Complete Genomics, a division of BGI, a genetic technology business, and DJI, a Chinese drone manufacturer. Hesai and DJI are both included in the 1260H list. While its former parent firm, BGI, is on the list, Complete Genomics is not. While it is challenging to enact legislation that forbids Congressmen from meeting with anybody, Republican Senator Marco Rubio told VOA that certain congressional offices have made the decision to forgo meetings with lobbying firms that represent Chinese defense businesses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Chinese business lobbying in Washington was virtually nonexistent until a few years ago, according to Craig Singleton, a senior researcher at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, but that all changed when the US government started pursuing Huawei. According to Singleton, there is room for improvement in the Department of Justice's involvement in limiting the CCP's negative lobbying effect on Capitol Hill. The Department of Justice is in charge of implementing and upholding FARA.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US lobbyists reevaluate ties: Shedding Chinese clients amid heightened oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-lobbyists-reevaluate-ties-shedding-chinese-clients-amid-heightened-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6913","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6902,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_content":"\n

After an Alabama judge deemed frozen embryos to be children, Democrats attempted in vain to ram legislation through the U.S. Senate that would have guaranteed Americans' access to IVF and other assisted reproductive technologies. At least three Alabama IVF clinics stopped doing IVF, which combines eggs and sperm in a lab dish for infertile couples, after the state Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos should be treated like children. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Challenges in the courtroom<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Because nonviable embryos are occasionally discarded or utilized for research, the Alabama court's decision has sparked worries that anyone participating in IVF may be prosecuted, and that it may also inspire other states to take similar legal action. Sen. Tammy Duckworth<\/a>, a Democrat and veteran of the Iraq War who was seriously injured in battle in 2004; she requested that the Senate take up her \"Access to Family Building Act\" legislation right now. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Alabama Supreme Court's decision last month that frozen embryos were lawfully regarded infants sparked fresh requests for federal safeguards for reproductive therapies, which led to the IVF business CooperSurgical filing. The decision, which caused some clinics in Alabama to stop IVF procedures, has set up a nationwide IVF firestorm. As the election draws near, Democrats are hammering Republicans on the matter, while the GOP is rushing to take positions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbying in Washington<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Thorn Run Partners, a Washington-based company licensed to effectively advocate on \"Fertility\" and \"Maternal Health,\" was engaged by CooperSurgical. This week, lawmakers in Alabama's Republican-controlled legislature passed a bill to safeguard IVF procedures. However, conservatives swiftly prevented the Senate from adopting the first federal policy. The Alabama Wrongful Death of a Minor Act made the destruction of embryos illegal, according to the court's ruling in that state's case. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Families alleging CooperSurgical caused the loss of their embryos are suing the corporation for undisclosed damages in many jurisdictions over identical allegations. CooperSurgical representative Adeena Fried responded, \"The company wanted to see that IVF remains accessible nationwide,\" when questioned about the choice to lobby. \"Our goal is to guarantee that the greatest goods and innovations can be utilized in Alabama and throughout the country to strengthen families and welcome new members into the world,\" the spokesperson stated. \"As of right now, a lot of clinics in Alabama are closed, and legislation nationwide needs to support the entire fertility industry.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The role of lobbying in reproductive technology<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In a similar vein, GenBioPro, a different reproductive health care firm, which manufactures mifepristone generically, approached Washington following a siege of their product. In 2022, a lobbying firm filed to represent the company, and the following year, GenBioPro filed a lawsuit against the FDA to maintain the drug's availability. CooperSurgical, a Connecticut-based corporation, recruited three seasoned Hill staffers, one of which was Jessie Brairton, a former Eli Lilly lobbyist and staff member of Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas). The other two lobbyists are Jacky Usyk, a veteran Democratic Senate assistant, and Andrew Rosenberg, a former aide to Sen. Ed Kennedy (D-Mass.), who co-founded the company. Federal filings state that CooperSurgical has not previously registered to lobby. Beasley met with Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra on Tuesday to talk about the turmoil and uncertainty caused by the Alabama Supreme Court decision that threatens IVF, as well as other individuals impacted by the decision. It caused many people's reproductive treatments to come to an abrupt halt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Balancing profit and patient welfare<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Every woman present at the discussion discussed the intense psychological stress and loneliness associated with receiving reproductive therapy. The epidemic had already caused some of them to have their reproductive treatments interrupted, only for the Supreme Court's ruling to throw them off course once again. According to fertility patient and nurse practitioner Kendall Diebold, \"the IVF world as a whole is so isolating and lonely.\" \"And all of that has really been taken by this, and it has just been magnified and filled with sadness, grief, and anger.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Internal medicine specialist Dr. Rachel Charles, who also has lupus, talked about the rigorous treatment plan she had to follow in order to do IVF and get ready for an embryo transfer. Rather than move on with an embryo transfer, she made the decision in February to take a break from the daily hormone injections. In a previous interview, Rebecca Mathews, 36, who is the mother of two IVF-conceived children, told The 19th that she was shocked and angry at the same time when she learned of the decision. She still has a frozen embryo and is unsure of what to do with it.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating legal turmoil: IVF company registers to lobby Washington","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-legal-turmoil-ivf-company-registers-to-lobby-washington","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6902","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6871,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_date_gmt":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_content":"\n

The Biden administration<\/a> remained dedicated to its alliances in the strategically significant Indo-Pacific area, one day after a US$95 billion <\/a>foreign assistance package omitted economic help pledged for the region as the US strives to counter China's influence there. We at the White House<\/a> and State Department are still in favor of funding authorization and appropriation. Deputy assistant secretary Camille Dawson of the US State Department stated, \"We feel it's critically important to continue working in close concert and in support of the freely associated states<\/a>,\" referring to the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau. Dawson said this in answer to a query from the Post at a press conference on the second anniversary of US President Joe Biden's Indo-Pacific Strategy announcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Navigating a Strategic Landscape<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The agreement is viewed as critical to Washington's efforts to sustain<\/a> its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken once declared that \"our planet's future will be written,\" despite growing concerns<\/a> about what some have called Beijing's coercive influence campaign.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That tactic may have its roots in the Compact of Free Association (Cofa), an agreement<\/a> that has guided US relations with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau for many years. First signed in 1986, the Cofa accord provides financial help and a legal framework<\/a> allowing its residents to live, work, and attend school in the United States in exchange for the US military having access to the land, air, and sea of the three Pacific island<\/a> nations. While Palau's Cofa program is scheduled to expire in September, that of the Marshall Islands and Micronesia expired on September 30. Last year, new agreements were established and extended, and Biden promised the three nations US$7.1 billion<\/a> spread over 20 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion,  One may make a compelling argument for the TikTok Election 2024. Every month, almost 170 million Americans use the app. About one-third of US individuals under 30 and roughly 43% of TikTok users say they routinely obtain their news from the platform, which is twice as many as three years ago, according to the Pew Research Center.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Slow roll: The uncertain fate of a TikTok ban","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"slow-roll-the-uncertain-fate-of-a-tiktok-ban","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6916","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6913,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-13 18:13:25","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-13 18:13:25","post_content":"\n

Legislators seeking to increase scrutiny are prompting lobbying companies in Washington to quickly withdraw their clients from China. The drive follows rising worries about China's influence and a recent spike in Chinese lobbying. The goal of legislators is to stop the People's Liberation Army (PLA) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)<\/a> from surreptitiously advancing agendas that undermine the interests of the American people by using legal loopholes. Senator John Cornyn, a Republican, told VOA's Mandarin Service that senators are almost done working on legislation that attempts to solve the issue. Members of the House have filed a bill to expose the exposing Foreign Influence in Lobbying Act, which was approved by the Senate last year. Cornyn co-sponsored the Senate legislation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The evolving landscape of US-China relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

\"Although there has been some opposition, we will keep working because it's critical to know who is genuinely influencing these legislators,\" Cornyn stated. Ensuring that individuals register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act has been the main priority. As you are aware, there have been several issues raised by persons failing to declare their lobbying agreements with foreign governments. Legislators are attempting to enact legislation that would close loopholes in the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 (LDA) and the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938 (FARA) in order to require greater transparency regarding foreign governments and political parties that engage in the organization, management, control, or supervision of lobbying efforts, whether or not they have received financial contributions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Scrutiny intensifies on lobbying practices<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

According to Cornyn, China presents a special difficulty. He remarked, \"The Chinese are unique in that they are forced to share information with the PLA and with their intelligence agencies; they do not have a true solely private sector.\" Thus, I would suggest that there should always be care when working with Chinese-owned businesses. The LDA, which mandates disclosure of domestic lobbying, and the FARA, which mandates disclosure of lobbying and other kinds of influence by foreign governments and political parties, control lobbying in the United States. But in 1995, FARA was changed to exclude people or firms representing foreigners if their activity isn't meant to help a foreign government or political party. Lobbyists consequently registered under the far less transparent LDA, which led to a sharp decline in FARA registrations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbyists navigate complex legal and ethical terrain<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The U.S. Department of Defense released the 1260H list, a list of \"Chinese military companies\" that operate directly or indirectly in the United States, in late January. This move prompted efforts to increase the inspection of China's lobbying operations. After that, lawmakers said that they were thinking of passing a bill that would make it illegal for lobbyists representing businesses on the list to meet with members of Congress, not even to address issues on behalf of their American clients. A chart that listed several Chinese enterprises, including some military firms, along with the names of their lobbying firms and whether or not they were included on the 1260H list started to circulate on Capitol Hill after the 1260H list was released. According to Robert Sutter, a professor of international affairs practice at George Washington University's Elliott School, Chinese military organizations' lobbying operations have traditionally been vague, and enforcement has been lax.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rising concerns over reputation and risk<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

As of late February, at least five American lobbying companies had lost Chinese business. Steptoe LLP and BGI, a Shenzhen biotech company, have ended their business relationship. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld ended its partnership with Xiaomi, a Chinese electronics business not on the 1260H list, and filed cease-and-desist filings to halt advocating for Hesai Group, a Chinese manufacturer of LiDARs. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Additionally, the Vogel Group has ceased lobbying on behalf of Complete Genomics, a division of BGI, a genetic technology business, and DJI, a Chinese drone manufacturer. Hesai and DJI are both included in the 1260H list. While its former parent firm, BGI, is on the list, Complete Genomics is not. While it is challenging to enact legislation that forbids Congressmen from meeting with anybody, Republican Senator Marco Rubio told VOA that certain congressional offices have made the decision to forgo meetings with lobbying firms that represent Chinese defense businesses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Chinese business lobbying in Washington was virtually nonexistent until a few years ago, according to Craig Singleton, a senior researcher at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, but that all changed when the US government started pursuing Huawei. According to Singleton, there is room for improvement in the Department of Justice's involvement in limiting the CCP's negative lobbying effect on Capitol Hill. The Department of Justice is in charge of implementing and upholding FARA.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US lobbyists reevaluate ties: Shedding Chinese clients amid heightened oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-lobbyists-reevaluate-ties-shedding-chinese-clients-amid-heightened-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6913","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6902,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_content":"\n

After an Alabama judge deemed frozen embryos to be children, Democrats attempted in vain to ram legislation through the U.S. Senate that would have guaranteed Americans' access to IVF and other assisted reproductive technologies. At least three Alabama IVF clinics stopped doing IVF, which combines eggs and sperm in a lab dish for infertile couples, after the state Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos should be treated like children. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Challenges in the courtroom<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Because nonviable embryos are occasionally discarded or utilized for research, the Alabama court's decision has sparked worries that anyone participating in IVF may be prosecuted, and that it may also inspire other states to take similar legal action. Sen. Tammy Duckworth<\/a>, a Democrat and veteran of the Iraq War who was seriously injured in battle in 2004; she requested that the Senate take up her \"Access to Family Building Act\" legislation right now. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Alabama Supreme Court's decision last month that frozen embryos were lawfully regarded infants sparked fresh requests for federal safeguards for reproductive therapies, which led to the IVF business CooperSurgical filing. The decision, which caused some clinics in Alabama to stop IVF procedures, has set up a nationwide IVF firestorm. As the election draws near, Democrats are hammering Republicans on the matter, while the GOP is rushing to take positions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbying in Washington<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Thorn Run Partners, a Washington-based company licensed to effectively advocate on \"Fertility\" and \"Maternal Health,\" was engaged by CooperSurgical. This week, lawmakers in Alabama's Republican-controlled legislature passed a bill to safeguard IVF procedures. However, conservatives swiftly prevented the Senate from adopting the first federal policy. The Alabama Wrongful Death of a Minor Act made the destruction of embryos illegal, according to the court's ruling in that state's case. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Families alleging CooperSurgical caused the loss of their embryos are suing the corporation for undisclosed damages in many jurisdictions over identical allegations. CooperSurgical representative Adeena Fried responded, \"The company wanted to see that IVF remains accessible nationwide,\" when questioned about the choice to lobby. \"Our goal is to guarantee that the greatest goods and innovations can be utilized in Alabama and throughout the country to strengthen families and welcome new members into the world,\" the spokesperson stated. \"As of right now, a lot of clinics in Alabama are closed, and legislation nationwide needs to support the entire fertility industry.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The role of lobbying in reproductive technology<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In a similar vein, GenBioPro, a different reproductive health care firm, which manufactures mifepristone generically, approached Washington following a siege of their product. In 2022, a lobbying firm filed to represent the company, and the following year, GenBioPro filed a lawsuit against the FDA to maintain the drug's availability. CooperSurgical, a Connecticut-based corporation, recruited three seasoned Hill staffers, one of which was Jessie Brairton, a former Eli Lilly lobbyist and staff member of Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas). The other two lobbyists are Jacky Usyk, a veteran Democratic Senate assistant, and Andrew Rosenberg, a former aide to Sen. Ed Kennedy (D-Mass.), who co-founded the company. Federal filings state that CooperSurgical has not previously registered to lobby. Beasley met with Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra on Tuesday to talk about the turmoil and uncertainty caused by the Alabama Supreme Court decision that threatens IVF, as well as other individuals impacted by the decision. It caused many people's reproductive treatments to come to an abrupt halt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Balancing profit and patient welfare<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Every woman present at the discussion discussed the intense psychological stress and loneliness associated with receiving reproductive therapy. The epidemic had already caused some of them to have their reproductive treatments interrupted, only for the Supreme Court's ruling to throw them off course once again. According to fertility patient and nurse practitioner Kendall Diebold, \"the IVF world as a whole is so isolating and lonely.\" \"And all of that has really been taken by this, and it has just been magnified and filled with sadness, grief, and anger.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Internal medicine specialist Dr. Rachel Charles, who also has lupus, talked about the rigorous treatment plan she had to follow in order to do IVF and get ready for an embryo transfer. Rather than move on with an embryo transfer, she made the decision in February to take a break from the daily hormone injections. In a previous interview, Rebecca Mathews, 36, who is the mother of two IVF-conceived children, told The 19th that she was shocked and angry at the same time when she learned of the decision. She still has a frozen embryo and is unsure of what to do with it.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating legal turmoil: IVF company registers to lobby Washington","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-legal-turmoil-ivf-company-registers-to-lobby-washington","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6902","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6871,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_date_gmt":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_content":"\n

The Biden administration<\/a> remained dedicated to its alliances in the strategically significant Indo-Pacific area, one day after a US$95 billion <\/a>foreign assistance package omitted economic help pledged for the region as the US strives to counter China's influence there. We at the White House<\/a> and State Department are still in favor of funding authorization and appropriation. Deputy assistant secretary Camille Dawson of the US State Department stated, \"We feel it's critically important to continue working in close concert and in support of the freely associated states<\/a>,\" referring to the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau. Dawson said this in answer to a query from the Post at a press conference on the second anniversary of US President Joe Biden's Indo-Pacific Strategy announcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Navigating a Strategic Landscape<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The agreement is viewed as critical to Washington's efforts to sustain<\/a> its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken once declared that \"our planet's future will be written,\" despite growing concerns<\/a> about what some have called Beijing's coercive influence campaign.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That tactic may have its roots in the Compact of Free Association (Cofa), an agreement<\/a> that has guided US relations with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau for many years. First signed in 1986, the Cofa accord provides financial help and a legal framework<\/a> allowing its residents to live, work, and attend school in the United States in exchange for the US military having access to the land, air, and sea of the three Pacific island<\/a> nations. While Palau's Cofa program is scheduled to expire in September, that of the Marshall Islands and Micronesia expired on September 30. Last year, new agreements were established and extended, and Biden promised the three nations US$7.1 billion<\/a> spread over 20 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

While there is pressure for a TikTok ban, a forced divestment may be more plausible. Or the altercation can go like a well-known Washington narrative: a major altercation, loud headlines, and then nothing. TikTok is like dry tinder waiting to catch fire every time it comes up. However, it always fizzles out, and it will most likely do so once more in this instance. The issue is that it's hard to get an agreement on a single issue when everyone has a plan. There is a more localized worry, even if politicians will undoubtedly consider the business and international policy ramifications of outlawing TikTok. It's become commonplace to call an election after the hottest platform of the day since politicians use social media every election cycle to try to win over young people.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion,  One may make a compelling argument for the TikTok Election 2024. Every month, almost 170 million Americans use the app. About one-third of US individuals under 30 and roughly 43% of TikTok users say they routinely obtain their news from the platform, which is twice as many as three years ago, according to the Pew Research Center.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Slow roll: The uncertain fate of a TikTok ban","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"slow-roll-the-uncertain-fate-of-a-tiktok-ban","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6916","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6913,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-13 18:13:25","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-13 18:13:25","post_content":"\n

Legislators seeking to increase scrutiny are prompting lobbying companies in Washington to quickly withdraw their clients from China. The drive follows rising worries about China's influence and a recent spike in Chinese lobbying. The goal of legislators is to stop the People's Liberation Army (PLA) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)<\/a> from surreptitiously advancing agendas that undermine the interests of the American people by using legal loopholes. Senator John Cornyn, a Republican, told VOA's Mandarin Service that senators are almost done working on legislation that attempts to solve the issue. Members of the House have filed a bill to expose the exposing Foreign Influence in Lobbying Act, which was approved by the Senate last year. Cornyn co-sponsored the Senate legislation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The evolving landscape of US-China relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

\"Although there has been some opposition, we will keep working because it's critical to know who is genuinely influencing these legislators,\" Cornyn stated. Ensuring that individuals register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act has been the main priority. As you are aware, there have been several issues raised by persons failing to declare their lobbying agreements with foreign governments. Legislators are attempting to enact legislation that would close loopholes in the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 (LDA) and the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938 (FARA) in order to require greater transparency regarding foreign governments and political parties that engage in the organization, management, control, or supervision of lobbying efforts, whether or not they have received financial contributions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Scrutiny intensifies on lobbying practices<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

According to Cornyn, China presents a special difficulty. He remarked, \"The Chinese are unique in that they are forced to share information with the PLA and with their intelligence agencies; they do not have a true solely private sector.\" Thus, I would suggest that there should always be care when working with Chinese-owned businesses. The LDA, which mandates disclosure of domestic lobbying, and the FARA, which mandates disclosure of lobbying and other kinds of influence by foreign governments and political parties, control lobbying in the United States. But in 1995, FARA was changed to exclude people or firms representing foreigners if their activity isn't meant to help a foreign government or political party. Lobbyists consequently registered under the far less transparent LDA, which led to a sharp decline in FARA registrations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbyists navigate complex legal and ethical terrain<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The U.S. Department of Defense released the 1260H list, a list of \"Chinese military companies\" that operate directly or indirectly in the United States, in late January. This move prompted efforts to increase the inspection of China's lobbying operations. After that, lawmakers said that they were thinking of passing a bill that would make it illegal for lobbyists representing businesses on the list to meet with members of Congress, not even to address issues on behalf of their American clients. A chart that listed several Chinese enterprises, including some military firms, along with the names of their lobbying firms and whether or not they were included on the 1260H list started to circulate on Capitol Hill after the 1260H list was released. According to Robert Sutter, a professor of international affairs practice at George Washington University's Elliott School, Chinese military organizations' lobbying operations have traditionally been vague, and enforcement has been lax.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rising concerns over reputation and risk<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

As of late February, at least five American lobbying companies had lost Chinese business. Steptoe LLP and BGI, a Shenzhen biotech company, have ended their business relationship. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld ended its partnership with Xiaomi, a Chinese electronics business not on the 1260H list, and filed cease-and-desist filings to halt advocating for Hesai Group, a Chinese manufacturer of LiDARs. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Additionally, the Vogel Group has ceased lobbying on behalf of Complete Genomics, a division of BGI, a genetic technology business, and DJI, a Chinese drone manufacturer. Hesai and DJI are both included in the 1260H list. While its former parent firm, BGI, is on the list, Complete Genomics is not. While it is challenging to enact legislation that forbids Congressmen from meeting with anybody, Republican Senator Marco Rubio told VOA that certain congressional offices have made the decision to forgo meetings with lobbying firms that represent Chinese defense businesses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Chinese business lobbying in Washington was virtually nonexistent until a few years ago, according to Craig Singleton, a senior researcher at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, but that all changed when the US government started pursuing Huawei. According to Singleton, there is room for improvement in the Department of Justice's involvement in limiting the CCP's negative lobbying effect on Capitol Hill. The Department of Justice is in charge of implementing and upholding FARA.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US lobbyists reevaluate ties: Shedding Chinese clients amid heightened oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-lobbyists-reevaluate-ties-shedding-chinese-clients-amid-heightened-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6913","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6902,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_content":"\n

After an Alabama judge deemed frozen embryos to be children, Democrats attempted in vain to ram legislation through the U.S. Senate that would have guaranteed Americans' access to IVF and other assisted reproductive technologies. At least three Alabama IVF clinics stopped doing IVF, which combines eggs and sperm in a lab dish for infertile couples, after the state Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos should be treated like children. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Challenges in the courtroom<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Because nonviable embryos are occasionally discarded or utilized for research, the Alabama court's decision has sparked worries that anyone participating in IVF may be prosecuted, and that it may also inspire other states to take similar legal action. Sen. Tammy Duckworth<\/a>, a Democrat and veteran of the Iraq War who was seriously injured in battle in 2004; she requested that the Senate take up her \"Access to Family Building Act\" legislation right now. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Alabama Supreme Court's decision last month that frozen embryos were lawfully regarded infants sparked fresh requests for federal safeguards for reproductive therapies, which led to the IVF business CooperSurgical filing. The decision, which caused some clinics in Alabama to stop IVF procedures, has set up a nationwide IVF firestorm. As the election draws near, Democrats are hammering Republicans on the matter, while the GOP is rushing to take positions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbying in Washington<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Thorn Run Partners, a Washington-based company licensed to effectively advocate on \"Fertility\" and \"Maternal Health,\" was engaged by CooperSurgical. This week, lawmakers in Alabama's Republican-controlled legislature passed a bill to safeguard IVF procedures. However, conservatives swiftly prevented the Senate from adopting the first federal policy. The Alabama Wrongful Death of a Minor Act made the destruction of embryos illegal, according to the court's ruling in that state's case. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Families alleging CooperSurgical caused the loss of their embryos are suing the corporation for undisclosed damages in many jurisdictions over identical allegations. CooperSurgical representative Adeena Fried responded, \"The company wanted to see that IVF remains accessible nationwide,\" when questioned about the choice to lobby. \"Our goal is to guarantee that the greatest goods and innovations can be utilized in Alabama and throughout the country to strengthen families and welcome new members into the world,\" the spokesperson stated. \"As of right now, a lot of clinics in Alabama are closed, and legislation nationwide needs to support the entire fertility industry.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The role of lobbying in reproductive technology<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In a similar vein, GenBioPro, a different reproductive health care firm, which manufactures mifepristone generically, approached Washington following a siege of their product. In 2022, a lobbying firm filed to represent the company, and the following year, GenBioPro filed a lawsuit against the FDA to maintain the drug's availability. CooperSurgical, a Connecticut-based corporation, recruited three seasoned Hill staffers, one of which was Jessie Brairton, a former Eli Lilly lobbyist and staff member of Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas). The other two lobbyists are Jacky Usyk, a veteran Democratic Senate assistant, and Andrew Rosenberg, a former aide to Sen. Ed Kennedy (D-Mass.), who co-founded the company. Federal filings state that CooperSurgical has not previously registered to lobby. Beasley met with Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra on Tuesday to talk about the turmoil and uncertainty caused by the Alabama Supreme Court decision that threatens IVF, as well as other individuals impacted by the decision. It caused many people's reproductive treatments to come to an abrupt halt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Balancing profit and patient welfare<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Every woman present at the discussion discussed the intense psychological stress and loneliness associated with receiving reproductive therapy. The epidemic had already caused some of them to have their reproductive treatments interrupted, only for the Supreme Court's ruling to throw them off course once again. According to fertility patient and nurse practitioner Kendall Diebold, \"the IVF world as a whole is so isolating and lonely.\" \"And all of that has really been taken by this, and it has just been magnified and filled with sadness, grief, and anger.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Internal medicine specialist Dr. Rachel Charles, who also has lupus, talked about the rigorous treatment plan she had to follow in order to do IVF and get ready for an embryo transfer. Rather than move on with an embryo transfer, she made the decision in February to take a break from the daily hormone injections. In a previous interview, Rebecca Mathews, 36, who is the mother of two IVF-conceived children, told The 19th that she was shocked and angry at the same time when she learned of the decision. She still has a frozen embryo and is unsure of what to do with it.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating legal turmoil: IVF company registers to lobby Washington","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-legal-turmoil-ivf-company-registers-to-lobby-washington","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6902","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6871,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_date_gmt":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_content":"\n

The Biden administration<\/a> remained dedicated to its alliances in the strategically significant Indo-Pacific area, one day after a US$95 billion <\/a>foreign assistance package omitted economic help pledged for the region as the US strives to counter China's influence there. We at the White House<\/a> and State Department are still in favor of funding authorization and appropriation. Deputy assistant secretary Camille Dawson of the US State Department stated, \"We feel it's critically important to continue working in close concert and in support of the freely associated states<\/a>,\" referring to the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau. Dawson said this in answer to a query from the Post at a press conference on the second anniversary of US President Joe Biden's Indo-Pacific Strategy announcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Navigating a Strategic Landscape<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The agreement is viewed as critical to Washington's efforts to sustain<\/a> its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken once declared that \"our planet's future will be written,\" despite growing concerns<\/a> about what some have called Beijing's coercive influence campaign.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That tactic may have its roots in the Compact of Free Association (Cofa), an agreement<\/a> that has guided US relations with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau for many years. First signed in 1986, the Cofa accord provides financial help and a legal framework<\/a> allowing its residents to live, work, and attend school in the United States in exchange for the US military having access to the land, air, and sea of the three Pacific island<\/a> nations. While Palau's Cofa program is scheduled to expire in September, that of the Marshall Islands and Micronesia expired on September 30. Last year, new agreements were established and extended, and Biden promised the three nations US$7.1 billion<\/a> spread over 20 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Public opinion and political dynamics<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

While there is pressure for a TikTok ban, a forced divestment may be more plausible. Or the altercation can go like a well-known Washington narrative: a major altercation, loud headlines, and then nothing. TikTok is like dry tinder waiting to catch fire every time it comes up. However, it always fizzles out, and it will most likely do so once more in this instance. The issue is that it's hard to get an agreement on a single issue when everyone has a plan. There is a more localized worry, even if politicians will undoubtedly consider the business and international policy ramifications of outlawing TikTok. It's become commonplace to call an election after the hottest platform of the day since politicians use social media every election cycle to try to win over young people.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion,  One may make a compelling argument for the TikTok Election 2024. Every month, almost 170 million Americans use the app. About one-third of US individuals under 30 and roughly 43% of TikTok users say they routinely obtain their news from the platform, which is twice as many as three years ago, according to the Pew Research Center.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Slow roll: The uncertain fate of a TikTok ban","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"slow-roll-the-uncertain-fate-of-a-tiktok-ban","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6916","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6913,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-13 18:13:25","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-13 18:13:25","post_content":"\n

Legislators seeking to increase scrutiny are prompting lobbying companies in Washington to quickly withdraw their clients from China. The drive follows rising worries about China's influence and a recent spike in Chinese lobbying. The goal of legislators is to stop the People's Liberation Army (PLA) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)<\/a> from surreptitiously advancing agendas that undermine the interests of the American people by using legal loopholes. Senator John Cornyn, a Republican, told VOA's Mandarin Service that senators are almost done working on legislation that attempts to solve the issue. Members of the House have filed a bill to expose the exposing Foreign Influence in Lobbying Act, which was approved by the Senate last year. Cornyn co-sponsored the Senate legislation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The evolving landscape of US-China relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

\"Although there has been some opposition, we will keep working because it's critical to know who is genuinely influencing these legislators,\" Cornyn stated. Ensuring that individuals register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act has been the main priority. As you are aware, there have been several issues raised by persons failing to declare their lobbying agreements with foreign governments. Legislators are attempting to enact legislation that would close loopholes in the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 (LDA) and the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938 (FARA) in order to require greater transparency regarding foreign governments and political parties that engage in the organization, management, control, or supervision of lobbying efforts, whether or not they have received financial contributions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Scrutiny intensifies on lobbying practices<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

According to Cornyn, China presents a special difficulty. He remarked, \"The Chinese are unique in that they are forced to share information with the PLA and with their intelligence agencies; they do not have a true solely private sector.\" Thus, I would suggest that there should always be care when working with Chinese-owned businesses. The LDA, which mandates disclosure of domestic lobbying, and the FARA, which mandates disclosure of lobbying and other kinds of influence by foreign governments and political parties, control lobbying in the United States. But in 1995, FARA was changed to exclude people or firms representing foreigners if their activity isn't meant to help a foreign government or political party. Lobbyists consequently registered under the far less transparent LDA, which led to a sharp decline in FARA registrations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbyists navigate complex legal and ethical terrain<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The U.S. Department of Defense released the 1260H list, a list of \"Chinese military companies\" that operate directly or indirectly in the United States, in late January. This move prompted efforts to increase the inspection of China's lobbying operations. After that, lawmakers said that they were thinking of passing a bill that would make it illegal for lobbyists representing businesses on the list to meet with members of Congress, not even to address issues on behalf of their American clients. A chart that listed several Chinese enterprises, including some military firms, along with the names of their lobbying firms and whether or not they were included on the 1260H list started to circulate on Capitol Hill after the 1260H list was released. According to Robert Sutter, a professor of international affairs practice at George Washington University's Elliott School, Chinese military organizations' lobbying operations have traditionally been vague, and enforcement has been lax.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rising concerns over reputation and risk<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

As of late February, at least five American lobbying companies had lost Chinese business. Steptoe LLP and BGI, a Shenzhen biotech company, have ended their business relationship. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld ended its partnership with Xiaomi, a Chinese electronics business not on the 1260H list, and filed cease-and-desist filings to halt advocating for Hesai Group, a Chinese manufacturer of LiDARs. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Additionally, the Vogel Group has ceased lobbying on behalf of Complete Genomics, a division of BGI, a genetic technology business, and DJI, a Chinese drone manufacturer. Hesai and DJI are both included in the 1260H list. While its former parent firm, BGI, is on the list, Complete Genomics is not. While it is challenging to enact legislation that forbids Congressmen from meeting with anybody, Republican Senator Marco Rubio told VOA that certain congressional offices have made the decision to forgo meetings with lobbying firms that represent Chinese defense businesses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Chinese business lobbying in Washington was virtually nonexistent until a few years ago, according to Craig Singleton, a senior researcher at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, but that all changed when the US government started pursuing Huawei. According to Singleton, there is room for improvement in the Department of Justice's involvement in limiting the CCP's negative lobbying effect on Capitol Hill. The Department of Justice is in charge of implementing and upholding FARA.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US lobbyists reevaluate ties: Shedding Chinese clients amid heightened oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-lobbyists-reevaluate-ties-shedding-chinese-clients-amid-heightened-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6913","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6902,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_content":"\n

After an Alabama judge deemed frozen embryos to be children, Democrats attempted in vain to ram legislation through the U.S. Senate that would have guaranteed Americans' access to IVF and other assisted reproductive technologies. At least three Alabama IVF clinics stopped doing IVF, which combines eggs and sperm in a lab dish for infertile couples, after the state Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos should be treated like children. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Challenges in the courtroom<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Because nonviable embryos are occasionally discarded or utilized for research, the Alabama court's decision has sparked worries that anyone participating in IVF may be prosecuted, and that it may also inspire other states to take similar legal action. Sen. Tammy Duckworth<\/a>, a Democrat and veteran of the Iraq War who was seriously injured in battle in 2004; she requested that the Senate take up her \"Access to Family Building Act\" legislation right now. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Alabama Supreme Court's decision last month that frozen embryos were lawfully regarded infants sparked fresh requests for federal safeguards for reproductive therapies, which led to the IVF business CooperSurgical filing. The decision, which caused some clinics in Alabama to stop IVF procedures, has set up a nationwide IVF firestorm. As the election draws near, Democrats are hammering Republicans on the matter, while the GOP is rushing to take positions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbying in Washington<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Thorn Run Partners, a Washington-based company licensed to effectively advocate on \"Fertility\" and \"Maternal Health,\" was engaged by CooperSurgical. This week, lawmakers in Alabama's Republican-controlled legislature passed a bill to safeguard IVF procedures. However, conservatives swiftly prevented the Senate from adopting the first federal policy. The Alabama Wrongful Death of a Minor Act made the destruction of embryos illegal, according to the court's ruling in that state's case. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Families alleging CooperSurgical caused the loss of their embryos are suing the corporation for undisclosed damages in many jurisdictions over identical allegations. CooperSurgical representative Adeena Fried responded, \"The company wanted to see that IVF remains accessible nationwide,\" when questioned about the choice to lobby. \"Our goal is to guarantee that the greatest goods and innovations can be utilized in Alabama and throughout the country to strengthen families and welcome new members into the world,\" the spokesperson stated. \"As of right now, a lot of clinics in Alabama are closed, and legislation nationwide needs to support the entire fertility industry.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The role of lobbying in reproductive technology<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In a similar vein, GenBioPro, a different reproductive health care firm, which manufactures mifepristone generically, approached Washington following a siege of their product. In 2022, a lobbying firm filed to represent the company, and the following year, GenBioPro filed a lawsuit against the FDA to maintain the drug's availability. CooperSurgical, a Connecticut-based corporation, recruited three seasoned Hill staffers, one of which was Jessie Brairton, a former Eli Lilly lobbyist and staff member of Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas). The other two lobbyists are Jacky Usyk, a veteran Democratic Senate assistant, and Andrew Rosenberg, a former aide to Sen. Ed Kennedy (D-Mass.), who co-founded the company. Federal filings state that CooperSurgical has not previously registered to lobby. Beasley met with Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra on Tuesday to talk about the turmoil and uncertainty caused by the Alabama Supreme Court decision that threatens IVF, as well as other individuals impacted by the decision. It caused many people's reproductive treatments to come to an abrupt halt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Balancing profit and patient welfare<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Every woman present at the discussion discussed the intense psychological stress and loneliness associated with receiving reproductive therapy. The epidemic had already caused some of them to have their reproductive treatments interrupted, only for the Supreme Court's ruling to throw them off course once again. According to fertility patient and nurse practitioner Kendall Diebold, \"the IVF world as a whole is so isolating and lonely.\" \"And all of that has really been taken by this, and it has just been magnified and filled with sadness, grief, and anger.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Internal medicine specialist Dr. Rachel Charles, who also has lupus, talked about the rigorous treatment plan she had to follow in order to do IVF and get ready for an embryo transfer. Rather than move on with an embryo transfer, she made the decision in February to take a break from the daily hormone injections. In a previous interview, Rebecca Mathews, 36, who is the mother of two IVF-conceived children, told The 19th that she was shocked and angry at the same time when she learned of the decision. She still has a frozen embryo and is unsure of what to do with it.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating legal turmoil: IVF company registers to lobby Washington","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-legal-turmoil-ivf-company-registers-to-lobby-washington","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6902","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6871,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_date_gmt":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_content":"\n

The Biden administration<\/a> remained dedicated to its alliances in the strategically significant Indo-Pacific area, one day after a US$95 billion <\/a>foreign assistance package omitted economic help pledged for the region as the US strives to counter China's influence there. We at the White House<\/a> and State Department are still in favor of funding authorization and appropriation. Deputy assistant secretary Camille Dawson of the US State Department stated, \"We feel it's critically important to continue working in close concert and in support of the freely associated states<\/a>,\" referring to the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau. Dawson said this in answer to a query from the Post at a press conference on the second anniversary of US President Joe Biden's Indo-Pacific Strategy announcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Navigating a Strategic Landscape<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The agreement is viewed as critical to Washington's efforts to sustain<\/a> its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken once declared that \"our planet's future will be written,\" despite growing concerns<\/a> about what some have called Beijing's coercive influence campaign.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That tactic may have its roots in the Compact of Free Association (Cofa), an agreement<\/a> that has guided US relations with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau for many years. First signed in 1986, the Cofa accord provides financial help and a legal framework<\/a> allowing its residents to live, work, and attend school in the United States in exchange for the US military having access to the land, air, and sea of the three Pacific island<\/a> nations. While Palau's Cofa program is scheduled to expire in September, that of the Marshall Islands and Micronesia expired on September 30. Last year, new agreements were established and extended, and Biden promised the three nations US$7.1 billion<\/a> spread over 20 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Trump had a meeting with Jeff Yass, the millionaire co-founder of Susquehanna International Group, a company that owns 15% of ByteDance and a significant Republican donor. Trump had changed his tune by Monday. During a phone interview with CNBC, he stated, \"A lot of people love TikTok.\" \"Many young children on TikTok will go insane without it.\" Ironically, the number of lawmakers seeking to put a ban on TikTok with conflicting agendas and large egos may be the largest hurdle to such a measure. While several senators have already begun to voice their disapproval of the House approach, no counterpart bill has been introduced in the Senate. It is anticipated that Senator Maria Cantwell, a Democrat from Washington, would eventually lead the charge on a TikTok law. Easter break is coming up soon. The legislative procedure is going to take longer. Politicians from both parties are also concerned about upsetting young people by interfering with their preferred app, especially with elections coming up.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Public opinion and political dynamics<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

While there is pressure for a TikTok ban, a forced divestment may be more plausible. Or the altercation can go like a well-known Washington narrative: a major altercation, loud headlines, and then nothing. TikTok is like dry tinder waiting to catch fire every time it comes up. However, it always fizzles out, and it will most likely do so once more in this instance. The issue is that it's hard to get an agreement on a single issue when everyone has a plan. There is a more localized worry, even if politicians will undoubtedly consider the business and international policy ramifications of outlawing TikTok. It's become commonplace to call an election after the hottest platform of the day since politicians use social media every election cycle to try to win over young people.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion,  One may make a compelling argument for the TikTok Election 2024. Every month, almost 170 million Americans use the app. About one-third of US individuals under 30 and roughly 43% of TikTok users say they routinely obtain their news from the platform, which is twice as many as three years ago, according to the Pew Research Center.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Slow roll: The uncertain fate of a TikTok ban","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"slow-roll-the-uncertain-fate-of-a-tiktok-ban","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6916","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6913,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-13 18:13:25","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-13 18:13:25","post_content":"\n

Legislators seeking to increase scrutiny are prompting lobbying companies in Washington to quickly withdraw their clients from China. The drive follows rising worries about China's influence and a recent spike in Chinese lobbying. The goal of legislators is to stop the People's Liberation Army (PLA) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)<\/a> from surreptitiously advancing agendas that undermine the interests of the American people by using legal loopholes. Senator John Cornyn, a Republican, told VOA's Mandarin Service that senators are almost done working on legislation that attempts to solve the issue. Members of the House have filed a bill to expose the exposing Foreign Influence in Lobbying Act, which was approved by the Senate last year. Cornyn co-sponsored the Senate legislation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The evolving landscape of US-China relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

\"Although there has been some opposition, we will keep working because it's critical to know who is genuinely influencing these legislators,\" Cornyn stated. Ensuring that individuals register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act has been the main priority. As you are aware, there have been several issues raised by persons failing to declare their lobbying agreements with foreign governments. Legislators are attempting to enact legislation that would close loopholes in the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 (LDA) and the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938 (FARA) in order to require greater transparency regarding foreign governments and political parties that engage in the organization, management, control, or supervision of lobbying efforts, whether or not they have received financial contributions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Scrutiny intensifies on lobbying practices<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

According to Cornyn, China presents a special difficulty. He remarked, \"The Chinese are unique in that they are forced to share information with the PLA and with their intelligence agencies; they do not have a true solely private sector.\" Thus, I would suggest that there should always be care when working with Chinese-owned businesses. The LDA, which mandates disclosure of domestic lobbying, and the FARA, which mandates disclosure of lobbying and other kinds of influence by foreign governments and political parties, control lobbying in the United States. But in 1995, FARA was changed to exclude people or firms representing foreigners if their activity isn't meant to help a foreign government or political party. Lobbyists consequently registered under the far less transparent LDA, which led to a sharp decline in FARA registrations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbyists navigate complex legal and ethical terrain<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The U.S. Department of Defense released the 1260H list, a list of \"Chinese military companies\" that operate directly or indirectly in the United States, in late January. This move prompted efforts to increase the inspection of China's lobbying operations. After that, lawmakers said that they were thinking of passing a bill that would make it illegal for lobbyists representing businesses on the list to meet with members of Congress, not even to address issues on behalf of their American clients. A chart that listed several Chinese enterprises, including some military firms, along with the names of their lobbying firms and whether or not they were included on the 1260H list started to circulate on Capitol Hill after the 1260H list was released. According to Robert Sutter, a professor of international affairs practice at George Washington University's Elliott School, Chinese military organizations' lobbying operations have traditionally been vague, and enforcement has been lax.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rising concerns over reputation and risk<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

As of late February, at least five American lobbying companies had lost Chinese business. Steptoe LLP and BGI, a Shenzhen biotech company, have ended their business relationship. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld ended its partnership with Xiaomi, a Chinese electronics business not on the 1260H list, and filed cease-and-desist filings to halt advocating for Hesai Group, a Chinese manufacturer of LiDARs. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Additionally, the Vogel Group has ceased lobbying on behalf of Complete Genomics, a division of BGI, a genetic technology business, and DJI, a Chinese drone manufacturer. Hesai and DJI are both included in the 1260H list. While its former parent firm, BGI, is on the list, Complete Genomics is not. While it is challenging to enact legislation that forbids Congressmen from meeting with anybody, Republican Senator Marco Rubio told VOA that certain congressional offices have made the decision to forgo meetings with lobbying firms that represent Chinese defense businesses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Chinese business lobbying in Washington was virtually nonexistent until a few years ago, according to Craig Singleton, a senior researcher at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, but that all changed when the US government started pursuing Huawei. According to Singleton, there is room for improvement in the Department of Justice's involvement in limiting the CCP's negative lobbying effect on Capitol Hill. The Department of Justice is in charge of implementing and upholding FARA.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US lobbyists reevaluate ties: Shedding Chinese clients amid heightened oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-lobbyists-reevaluate-ties-shedding-chinese-clients-amid-heightened-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6913","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6902,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_content":"\n

After an Alabama judge deemed frozen embryos to be children, Democrats attempted in vain to ram legislation through the U.S. Senate that would have guaranteed Americans' access to IVF and other assisted reproductive technologies. At least three Alabama IVF clinics stopped doing IVF, which combines eggs and sperm in a lab dish for infertile couples, after the state Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos should be treated like children. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Challenges in the courtroom<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Because nonviable embryos are occasionally discarded or utilized for research, the Alabama court's decision has sparked worries that anyone participating in IVF may be prosecuted, and that it may also inspire other states to take similar legal action. Sen. Tammy Duckworth<\/a>, a Democrat and veteran of the Iraq War who was seriously injured in battle in 2004; she requested that the Senate take up her \"Access to Family Building Act\" legislation right now. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Alabama Supreme Court's decision last month that frozen embryos were lawfully regarded infants sparked fresh requests for federal safeguards for reproductive therapies, which led to the IVF business CooperSurgical filing. The decision, which caused some clinics in Alabama to stop IVF procedures, has set up a nationwide IVF firestorm. As the election draws near, Democrats are hammering Republicans on the matter, while the GOP is rushing to take positions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbying in Washington<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Thorn Run Partners, a Washington-based company licensed to effectively advocate on \"Fertility\" and \"Maternal Health,\" was engaged by CooperSurgical. This week, lawmakers in Alabama's Republican-controlled legislature passed a bill to safeguard IVF procedures. However, conservatives swiftly prevented the Senate from adopting the first federal policy. The Alabama Wrongful Death of a Minor Act made the destruction of embryos illegal, according to the court's ruling in that state's case. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Families alleging CooperSurgical caused the loss of their embryos are suing the corporation for undisclosed damages in many jurisdictions over identical allegations. CooperSurgical representative Adeena Fried responded, \"The company wanted to see that IVF remains accessible nationwide,\" when questioned about the choice to lobby. \"Our goal is to guarantee that the greatest goods and innovations can be utilized in Alabama and throughout the country to strengthen families and welcome new members into the world,\" the spokesperson stated. \"As of right now, a lot of clinics in Alabama are closed, and legislation nationwide needs to support the entire fertility industry.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The role of lobbying in reproductive technology<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In a similar vein, GenBioPro, a different reproductive health care firm, which manufactures mifepristone generically, approached Washington following a siege of their product. In 2022, a lobbying firm filed to represent the company, and the following year, GenBioPro filed a lawsuit against the FDA to maintain the drug's availability. CooperSurgical, a Connecticut-based corporation, recruited three seasoned Hill staffers, one of which was Jessie Brairton, a former Eli Lilly lobbyist and staff member of Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas). The other two lobbyists are Jacky Usyk, a veteran Democratic Senate assistant, and Andrew Rosenberg, a former aide to Sen. Ed Kennedy (D-Mass.), who co-founded the company. Federal filings state that CooperSurgical has not previously registered to lobby. Beasley met with Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra on Tuesday to talk about the turmoil and uncertainty caused by the Alabama Supreme Court decision that threatens IVF, as well as other individuals impacted by the decision. It caused many people's reproductive treatments to come to an abrupt halt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Balancing profit and patient welfare<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Every woman present at the discussion discussed the intense psychological stress and loneliness associated with receiving reproductive therapy. The epidemic had already caused some of them to have their reproductive treatments interrupted, only for the Supreme Court's ruling to throw them off course once again. According to fertility patient and nurse practitioner Kendall Diebold, \"the IVF world as a whole is so isolating and lonely.\" \"And all of that has really been taken by this, and it has just been magnified and filled with sadness, grief, and anger.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Internal medicine specialist Dr. Rachel Charles, who also has lupus, talked about the rigorous treatment plan she had to follow in order to do IVF and get ready for an embryo transfer. Rather than move on with an embryo transfer, she made the decision in February to take a break from the daily hormone injections. In a previous interview, Rebecca Mathews, 36, who is the mother of two IVF-conceived children, told The 19th that she was shocked and angry at the same time when she learned of the decision. She still has a frozen embryo and is unsure of what to do with it.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating legal turmoil: IVF company registers to lobby Washington","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-legal-turmoil-ivf-company-registers-to-lobby-washington","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6902","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6871,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_date_gmt":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_content":"\n

The Biden administration<\/a> remained dedicated to its alliances in the strategically significant Indo-Pacific area, one day after a US$95 billion <\/a>foreign assistance package omitted economic help pledged for the region as the US strives to counter China's influence there. We at the White House<\/a> and State Department are still in favor of funding authorization and appropriation. Deputy assistant secretary Camille Dawson of the US State Department stated, \"We feel it's critically important to continue working in close concert and in support of the freely associated states<\/a>,\" referring to the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau. Dawson said this in answer to a query from the Post at a press conference on the second anniversary of US President Joe Biden's Indo-Pacific Strategy announcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Navigating a Strategic Landscape<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The agreement is viewed as critical to Washington's efforts to sustain<\/a> its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken once declared that \"our planet's future will be written,\" despite growing concerns<\/a> about what some have called Beijing's coercive influence campaign.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That tactic may have its roots in the Compact of Free Association (Cofa), an agreement<\/a> that has guided US relations with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau for many years. First signed in 1986, the Cofa accord provides financial help and a legal framework<\/a> allowing its residents to live, work, and attend school in the United States in exchange for the US military having access to the land, air, and sea of the three Pacific island<\/a> nations. While Palau's Cofa program is scheduled to expire in September, that of the Marshall Islands and Micronesia expired on September 30. Last year, new agreements were established and extended, and Biden promised the three nations US$7.1 billion<\/a> spread over 20 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Global impact of a TikTok ban<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump had a meeting with Jeff Yass, the millionaire co-founder of Susquehanna International Group, a company that owns 15% of ByteDance and a significant Republican donor. Trump had changed his tune by Monday. During a phone interview with CNBC, he stated, \"A lot of people love TikTok.\" \"Many young children on TikTok will go insane without it.\" Ironically, the number of lawmakers seeking to put a ban on TikTok with conflicting agendas and large egos may be the largest hurdle to such a measure. While several senators have already begun to voice their disapproval of the House approach, no counterpart bill has been introduced in the Senate. It is anticipated that Senator Maria Cantwell, a Democrat from Washington, would eventually lead the charge on a TikTok law. Easter break is coming up soon. The legislative procedure is going to take longer. Politicians from both parties are also concerned about upsetting young people by interfering with their preferred app, especially with elections coming up.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Public opinion and political dynamics<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

While there is pressure for a TikTok ban, a forced divestment may be more plausible. Or the altercation can go like a well-known Washington narrative: a major altercation, loud headlines, and then nothing. TikTok is like dry tinder waiting to catch fire every time it comes up. However, it always fizzles out, and it will most likely do so once more in this instance. The issue is that it's hard to get an agreement on a single issue when everyone has a plan. There is a more localized worry, even if politicians will undoubtedly consider the business and international policy ramifications of outlawing TikTok. It's become commonplace to call an election after the hottest platform of the day since politicians use social media every election cycle to try to win over young people.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion,  One may make a compelling argument for the TikTok Election 2024. Every month, almost 170 million Americans use the app. About one-third of US individuals under 30 and roughly 43% of TikTok users say they routinely obtain their news from the platform, which is twice as many as three years ago, according to the Pew Research Center.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Slow roll: The uncertain fate of a TikTok ban","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"slow-roll-the-uncertain-fate-of-a-tiktok-ban","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6916","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6913,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-13 18:13:25","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-13 18:13:25","post_content":"\n

Legislators seeking to increase scrutiny are prompting lobbying companies in Washington to quickly withdraw their clients from China. The drive follows rising worries about China's influence and a recent spike in Chinese lobbying. The goal of legislators is to stop the People's Liberation Army (PLA) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)<\/a> from surreptitiously advancing agendas that undermine the interests of the American people by using legal loopholes. Senator John Cornyn, a Republican, told VOA's Mandarin Service that senators are almost done working on legislation that attempts to solve the issue. Members of the House have filed a bill to expose the exposing Foreign Influence in Lobbying Act, which was approved by the Senate last year. Cornyn co-sponsored the Senate legislation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The evolving landscape of US-China relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

\"Although there has been some opposition, we will keep working because it's critical to know who is genuinely influencing these legislators,\" Cornyn stated. Ensuring that individuals register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act has been the main priority. As you are aware, there have been several issues raised by persons failing to declare their lobbying agreements with foreign governments. Legislators are attempting to enact legislation that would close loopholes in the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 (LDA) and the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938 (FARA) in order to require greater transparency regarding foreign governments and political parties that engage in the organization, management, control, or supervision of lobbying efforts, whether or not they have received financial contributions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Scrutiny intensifies on lobbying practices<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

According to Cornyn, China presents a special difficulty. He remarked, \"The Chinese are unique in that they are forced to share information with the PLA and with their intelligence agencies; they do not have a true solely private sector.\" Thus, I would suggest that there should always be care when working with Chinese-owned businesses. The LDA, which mandates disclosure of domestic lobbying, and the FARA, which mandates disclosure of lobbying and other kinds of influence by foreign governments and political parties, control lobbying in the United States. But in 1995, FARA was changed to exclude people or firms representing foreigners if their activity isn't meant to help a foreign government or political party. Lobbyists consequently registered under the far less transparent LDA, which led to a sharp decline in FARA registrations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbyists navigate complex legal and ethical terrain<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The U.S. Department of Defense released the 1260H list, a list of \"Chinese military companies\" that operate directly or indirectly in the United States, in late January. This move prompted efforts to increase the inspection of China's lobbying operations. After that, lawmakers said that they were thinking of passing a bill that would make it illegal for lobbyists representing businesses on the list to meet with members of Congress, not even to address issues on behalf of their American clients. A chart that listed several Chinese enterprises, including some military firms, along with the names of their lobbying firms and whether or not they were included on the 1260H list started to circulate on Capitol Hill after the 1260H list was released. According to Robert Sutter, a professor of international affairs practice at George Washington University's Elliott School, Chinese military organizations' lobbying operations have traditionally been vague, and enforcement has been lax.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rising concerns over reputation and risk<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

As of late February, at least five American lobbying companies had lost Chinese business. Steptoe LLP and BGI, a Shenzhen biotech company, have ended their business relationship. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld ended its partnership with Xiaomi, a Chinese electronics business not on the 1260H list, and filed cease-and-desist filings to halt advocating for Hesai Group, a Chinese manufacturer of LiDARs. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Additionally, the Vogel Group has ceased lobbying on behalf of Complete Genomics, a division of BGI, a genetic technology business, and DJI, a Chinese drone manufacturer. Hesai and DJI are both included in the 1260H list. While its former parent firm, BGI, is on the list, Complete Genomics is not. While it is challenging to enact legislation that forbids Congressmen from meeting with anybody, Republican Senator Marco Rubio told VOA that certain congressional offices have made the decision to forgo meetings with lobbying firms that represent Chinese defense businesses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Chinese business lobbying in Washington was virtually nonexistent until a few years ago, according to Craig Singleton, a senior researcher at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, but that all changed when the US government started pursuing Huawei. According to Singleton, there is room for improvement in the Department of Justice's involvement in limiting the CCP's negative lobbying effect on Capitol Hill. The Department of Justice is in charge of implementing and upholding FARA.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US lobbyists reevaluate ties: Shedding Chinese clients amid heightened oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-lobbyists-reevaluate-ties-shedding-chinese-clients-amid-heightened-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6913","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6902,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_content":"\n

After an Alabama judge deemed frozen embryos to be children, Democrats attempted in vain to ram legislation through the U.S. Senate that would have guaranteed Americans' access to IVF and other assisted reproductive technologies. At least three Alabama IVF clinics stopped doing IVF, which combines eggs and sperm in a lab dish for infertile couples, after the state Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos should be treated like children. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Challenges in the courtroom<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Because nonviable embryos are occasionally discarded or utilized for research, the Alabama court's decision has sparked worries that anyone participating in IVF may be prosecuted, and that it may also inspire other states to take similar legal action. Sen. Tammy Duckworth<\/a>, a Democrat and veteran of the Iraq War who was seriously injured in battle in 2004; she requested that the Senate take up her \"Access to Family Building Act\" legislation right now. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Alabama Supreme Court's decision last month that frozen embryos were lawfully regarded infants sparked fresh requests for federal safeguards for reproductive therapies, which led to the IVF business CooperSurgical filing. The decision, which caused some clinics in Alabama to stop IVF procedures, has set up a nationwide IVF firestorm. As the election draws near, Democrats are hammering Republicans on the matter, while the GOP is rushing to take positions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbying in Washington<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Thorn Run Partners, a Washington-based company licensed to effectively advocate on \"Fertility\" and \"Maternal Health,\" was engaged by CooperSurgical. This week, lawmakers in Alabama's Republican-controlled legislature passed a bill to safeguard IVF procedures. However, conservatives swiftly prevented the Senate from adopting the first federal policy. The Alabama Wrongful Death of a Minor Act made the destruction of embryos illegal, according to the court's ruling in that state's case. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Families alleging CooperSurgical caused the loss of their embryos are suing the corporation for undisclosed damages in many jurisdictions over identical allegations. CooperSurgical representative Adeena Fried responded, \"The company wanted to see that IVF remains accessible nationwide,\" when questioned about the choice to lobby. \"Our goal is to guarantee that the greatest goods and innovations can be utilized in Alabama and throughout the country to strengthen families and welcome new members into the world,\" the spokesperson stated. \"As of right now, a lot of clinics in Alabama are closed, and legislation nationwide needs to support the entire fertility industry.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The role of lobbying in reproductive technology<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In a similar vein, GenBioPro, a different reproductive health care firm, which manufactures mifepristone generically, approached Washington following a siege of their product. In 2022, a lobbying firm filed to represent the company, and the following year, GenBioPro filed a lawsuit against the FDA to maintain the drug's availability. CooperSurgical, a Connecticut-based corporation, recruited three seasoned Hill staffers, one of which was Jessie Brairton, a former Eli Lilly lobbyist and staff member of Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas). The other two lobbyists are Jacky Usyk, a veteran Democratic Senate assistant, and Andrew Rosenberg, a former aide to Sen. Ed Kennedy (D-Mass.), who co-founded the company. Federal filings state that CooperSurgical has not previously registered to lobby. Beasley met with Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra on Tuesday to talk about the turmoil and uncertainty caused by the Alabama Supreme Court decision that threatens IVF, as well as other individuals impacted by the decision. It caused many people's reproductive treatments to come to an abrupt halt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Balancing profit and patient welfare<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Every woman present at the discussion discussed the intense psychological stress and loneliness associated with receiving reproductive therapy. The epidemic had already caused some of them to have their reproductive treatments interrupted, only for the Supreme Court's ruling to throw them off course once again. According to fertility patient and nurse practitioner Kendall Diebold, \"the IVF world as a whole is so isolating and lonely.\" \"And all of that has really been taken by this, and it has just been magnified and filled with sadness, grief, and anger.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Internal medicine specialist Dr. Rachel Charles, who also has lupus, talked about the rigorous treatment plan she had to follow in order to do IVF and get ready for an embryo transfer. Rather than move on with an embryo transfer, she made the decision in February to take a break from the daily hormone injections. In a previous interview, Rebecca Mathews, 36, who is the mother of two IVF-conceived children, told The 19th that she was shocked and angry at the same time when she learned of the decision. She still has a frozen embryo and is unsure of what to do with it.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating legal turmoil: IVF company registers to lobby Washington","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-legal-turmoil-ivf-company-registers-to-lobby-washington","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6902","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6871,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_date_gmt":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_content":"\n

The Biden administration<\/a> remained dedicated to its alliances in the strategically significant Indo-Pacific area, one day after a US$95 billion <\/a>foreign assistance package omitted economic help pledged for the region as the US strives to counter China's influence there. We at the White House<\/a> and State Department are still in favor of funding authorization and appropriation. Deputy assistant secretary Camille Dawson of the US State Department stated, \"We feel it's critically important to continue working in close concert and in support of the freely associated states<\/a>,\" referring to the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau. Dawson said this in answer to a query from the Post at a press conference on the second anniversary of US President Joe Biden's Indo-Pacific Strategy announcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Navigating a Strategic Landscape<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The agreement is viewed as critical to Washington's efforts to sustain<\/a> its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken once declared that \"our planet's future will be written,\" despite growing concerns<\/a> about what some have called Beijing's coercive influence campaign.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That tactic may have its roots in the Compact of Free Association (Cofa), an agreement<\/a> that has guided US relations with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau for many years. First signed in 1986, the Cofa accord provides financial help and a legal framework<\/a> allowing its residents to live, work, and attend school in the United States in exchange for the US military having access to the land, air, and sea of the three Pacific island<\/a> nations. While Palau's Cofa program is scheduled to expire in September, that of the Marshall Islands and Micronesia expired on September 30. Last year, new agreements were established and extended, and Biden promised the three nations US$7.1 billion<\/a> spread over 20 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Bipartisan support for a ban in a key House committee vote last week set the process in motion. TikTok launched a ferocious lobbying effort, encouraging its video makers to contact their congressional representatives through push alerts. Most of it backfired. TikTok was accused by the Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party of \"lying to its users and using them to lobby Congress to benefit a foreign adversary.\" The committee was co-authored by Representatives Raja Krishnamoorthi, an Illinois Democrat, and Mike Gallagher, a Republican from Wisconsin. Nothing in Washington, including the TikTok ban, is ever as straightforward or obvious as it first appears. First, a group of legislators from both parties oppose it. Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, a libertarian Republican who opposes government intervention in business, particularly with Chinese-owned social media companies, finds it offensive. Many liberals, including the inventor herself, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, dislike it as well because they believe it would restrict the freedom of speech of youth and because they are wary of the China hawks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Global impact of a TikTok ban<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump had a meeting with Jeff Yass, the millionaire co-founder of Susquehanna International Group, a company that owns 15% of ByteDance and a significant Republican donor. Trump had changed his tune by Monday. During a phone interview with CNBC, he stated, \"A lot of people love TikTok.\" \"Many young children on TikTok will go insane without it.\" Ironically, the number of lawmakers seeking to put a ban on TikTok with conflicting agendas and large egos may be the largest hurdle to such a measure. While several senators have already begun to voice their disapproval of the House approach, no counterpart bill has been introduced in the Senate. It is anticipated that Senator Maria Cantwell, a Democrat from Washington, would eventually lead the charge on a TikTok law. Easter break is coming up soon. The legislative procedure is going to take longer. Politicians from both parties are also concerned about upsetting young people by interfering with their preferred app, especially with elections coming up.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Public opinion and political dynamics<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

While there is pressure for a TikTok ban, a forced divestment may be more plausible. Or the altercation can go like a well-known Washington narrative: a major altercation, loud headlines, and then nothing. TikTok is like dry tinder waiting to catch fire every time it comes up. However, it always fizzles out, and it will most likely do so once more in this instance. The issue is that it's hard to get an agreement on a single issue when everyone has a plan. There is a more localized worry, even if politicians will undoubtedly consider the business and international policy ramifications of outlawing TikTok. It's become commonplace to call an election after the hottest platform of the day since politicians use social media every election cycle to try to win over young people.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion,  One may make a compelling argument for the TikTok Election 2024. Every month, almost 170 million Americans use the app. About one-third of US individuals under 30 and roughly 43% of TikTok users say they routinely obtain their news from the platform, which is twice as many as three years ago, according to the Pew Research Center.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Slow roll: The uncertain fate of a TikTok ban","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"slow-roll-the-uncertain-fate-of-a-tiktok-ban","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6916","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6913,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-13 18:13:25","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-13 18:13:25","post_content":"\n

Legislators seeking to increase scrutiny are prompting lobbying companies in Washington to quickly withdraw their clients from China. The drive follows rising worries about China's influence and a recent spike in Chinese lobbying. The goal of legislators is to stop the People's Liberation Army (PLA) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)<\/a> from surreptitiously advancing agendas that undermine the interests of the American people by using legal loopholes. Senator John Cornyn, a Republican, told VOA's Mandarin Service that senators are almost done working on legislation that attempts to solve the issue. Members of the House have filed a bill to expose the exposing Foreign Influence in Lobbying Act, which was approved by the Senate last year. Cornyn co-sponsored the Senate legislation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The evolving landscape of US-China relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

\"Although there has been some opposition, we will keep working because it's critical to know who is genuinely influencing these legislators,\" Cornyn stated. Ensuring that individuals register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act has been the main priority. As you are aware, there have been several issues raised by persons failing to declare their lobbying agreements with foreign governments. Legislators are attempting to enact legislation that would close loopholes in the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 (LDA) and the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938 (FARA) in order to require greater transparency regarding foreign governments and political parties that engage in the organization, management, control, or supervision of lobbying efforts, whether or not they have received financial contributions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Scrutiny intensifies on lobbying practices<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

According to Cornyn, China presents a special difficulty. He remarked, \"The Chinese are unique in that they are forced to share information with the PLA and with their intelligence agencies; they do not have a true solely private sector.\" Thus, I would suggest that there should always be care when working with Chinese-owned businesses. The LDA, which mandates disclosure of domestic lobbying, and the FARA, which mandates disclosure of lobbying and other kinds of influence by foreign governments and political parties, control lobbying in the United States. But in 1995, FARA was changed to exclude people or firms representing foreigners if their activity isn't meant to help a foreign government or political party. Lobbyists consequently registered under the far less transparent LDA, which led to a sharp decline in FARA registrations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbyists navigate complex legal and ethical terrain<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The U.S. Department of Defense released the 1260H list, a list of \"Chinese military companies\" that operate directly or indirectly in the United States, in late January. This move prompted efforts to increase the inspection of China's lobbying operations. After that, lawmakers said that they were thinking of passing a bill that would make it illegal for lobbyists representing businesses on the list to meet with members of Congress, not even to address issues on behalf of their American clients. A chart that listed several Chinese enterprises, including some military firms, along with the names of their lobbying firms and whether or not they were included on the 1260H list started to circulate on Capitol Hill after the 1260H list was released. According to Robert Sutter, a professor of international affairs practice at George Washington University's Elliott School, Chinese military organizations' lobbying operations have traditionally been vague, and enforcement has been lax.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rising concerns over reputation and risk<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

As of late February, at least five American lobbying companies had lost Chinese business. Steptoe LLP and BGI, a Shenzhen biotech company, have ended their business relationship. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld ended its partnership with Xiaomi, a Chinese electronics business not on the 1260H list, and filed cease-and-desist filings to halt advocating for Hesai Group, a Chinese manufacturer of LiDARs. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Additionally, the Vogel Group has ceased lobbying on behalf of Complete Genomics, a division of BGI, a genetic technology business, and DJI, a Chinese drone manufacturer. Hesai and DJI are both included in the 1260H list. While its former parent firm, BGI, is on the list, Complete Genomics is not. While it is challenging to enact legislation that forbids Congressmen from meeting with anybody, Republican Senator Marco Rubio told VOA that certain congressional offices have made the decision to forgo meetings with lobbying firms that represent Chinese defense businesses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Chinese business lobbying in Washington was virtually nonexistent until a few years ago, according to Craig Singleton, a senior researcher at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, but that all changed when the US government started pursuing Huawei. According to Singleton, there is room for improvement in the Department of Justice's involvement in limiting the CCP's negative lobbying effect on Capitol Hill. The Department of Justice is in charge of implementing and upholding FARA.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US lobbyists reevaluate ties: Shedding Chinese clients amid heightened oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-lobbyists-reevaluate-ties-shedding-chinese-clients-amid-heightened-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6913","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6902,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_content":"\n

After an Alabama judge deemed frozen embryos to be children, Democrats attempted in vain to ram legislation through the U.S. Senate that would have guaranteed Americans' access to IVF and other assisted reproductive technologies. At least three Alabama IVF clinics stopped doing IVF, which combines eggs and sperm in a lab dish for infertile couples, after the state Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos should be treated like children. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Challenges in the courtroom<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Because nonviable embryos are occasionally discarded or utilized for research, the Alabama court's decision has sparked worries that anyone participating in IVF may be prosecuted, and that it may also inspire other states to take similar legal action. Sen. Tammy Duckworth<\/a>, a Democrat and veteran of the Iraq War who was seriously injured in battle in 2004; she requested that the Senate take up her \"Access to Family Building Act\" legislation right now. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Alabama Supreme Court's decision last month that frozen embryos were lawfully regarded infants sparked fresh requests for federal safeguards for reproductive therapies, which led to the IVF business CooperSurgical filing. The decision, which caused some clinics in Alabama to stop IVF procedures, has set up a nationwide IVF firestorm. As the election draws near, Democrats are hammering Republicans on the matter, while the GOP is rushing to take positions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbying in Washington<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Thorn Run Partners, a Washington-based company licensed to effectively advocate on \"Fertility\" and \"Maternal Health,\" was engaged by CooperSurgical. This week, lawmakers in Alabama's Republican-controlled legislature passed a bill to safeguard IVF procedures. However, conservatives swiftly prevented the Senate from adopting the first federal policy. The Alabama Wrongful Death of a Minor Act made the destruction of embryos illegal, according to the court's ruling in that state's case. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Families alleging CooperSurgical caused the loss of their embryos are suing the corporation for undisclosed damages in many jurisdictions over identical allegations. CooperSurgical representative Adeena Fried responded, \"The company wanted to see that IVF remains accessible nationwide,\" when questioned about the choice to lobby. \"Our goal is to guarantee that the greatest goods and innovations can be utilized in Alabama and throughout the country to strengthen families and welcome new members into the world,\" the spokesperson stated. \"As of right now, a lot of clinics in Alabama are closed, and legislation nationwide needs to support the entire fertility industry.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The role of lobbying in reproductive technology<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In a similar vein, GenBioPro, a different reproductive health care firm, which manufactures mifepristone generically, approached Washington following a siege of their product. In 2022, a lobbying firm filed to represent the company, and the following year, GenBioPro filed a lawsuit against the FDA to maintain the drug's availability. CooperSurgical, a Connecticut-based corporation, recruited three seasoned Hill staffers, one of which was Jessie Brairton, a former Eli Lilly lobbyist and staff member of Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas). The other two lobbyists are Jacky Usyk, a veteran Democratic Senate assistant, and Andrew Rosenberg, a former aide to Sen. Ed Kennedy (D-Mass.), who co-founded the company. Federal filings state that CooperSurgical has not previously registered to lobby. Beasley met with Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra on Tuesday to talk about the turmoil and uncertainty caused by the Alabama Supreme Court decision that threatens IVF, as well as other individuals impacted by the decision. It caused many people's reproductive treatments to come to an abrupt halt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Balancing profit and patient welfare<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Every woman present at the discussion discussed the intense psychological stress and loneliness associated with receiving reproductive therapy. The epidemic had already caused some of them to have their reproductive treatments interrupted, only for the Supreme Court's ruling to throw them off course once again. According to fertility patient and nurse practitioner Kendall Diebold, \"the IVF world as a whole is so isolating and lonely.\" \"And all of that has really been taken by this, and it has just been magnified and filled with sadness, grief, and anger.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Internal medicine specialist Dr. Rachel Charles, who also has lupus, talked about the rigorous treatment plan she had to follow in order to do IVF and get ready for an embryo transfer. Rather than move on with an embryo transfer, she made the decision in February to take a break from the daily hormone injections. In a previous interview, Rebecca Mathews, 36, who is the mother of two IVF-conceived children, told The 19th that she was shocked and angry at the same time when she learned of the decision. She still has a frozen embryo and is unsure of what to do with it.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating legal turmoil: IVF company registers to lobby Washington","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-legal-turmoil-ivf-company-registers-to-lobby-washington","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6902","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6871,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_date_gmt":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_content":"\n

The Biden administration<\/a> remained dedicated to its alliances in the strategically significant Indo-Pacific area, one day after a US$95 billion <\/a>foreign assistance package omitted economic help pledged for the region as the US strives to counter China's influence there. We at the White House<\/a> and State Department are still in favor of funding authorization and appropriation. Deputy assistant secretary Camille Dawson of the US State Department stated, \"We feel it's critically important to continue working in close concert and in support of the freely associated states<\/a>,\" referring to the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau. Dawson said this in answer to a query from the Post at a press conference on the second anniversary of US President Joe Biden's Indo-Pacific Strategy announcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Navigating a Strategic Landscape<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The agreement is viewed as critical to Washington's efforts to sustain<\/a> its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken once declared that \"our planet's future will be written,\" despite growing concerns<\/a> about what some have called Beijing's coercive influence campaign.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That tactic may have its roots in the Compact of Free Association (Cofa), an agreement<\/a> that has guided US relations with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau for many years. First signed in 1986, the Cofa accord provides financial help and a legal framework<\/a> allowing its residents to live, work, and attend school in the United States in exchange for the US military having access to the land, air, and sea of the three Pacific island<\/a> nations. While Palau's Cofa program is scheduled to expire in September, that of the Marshall Islands and Micronesia expired on September 30. Last year, new agreements were established and extended, and Biden promised the three nations US$7.1 billion<\/a> spread over 20 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Legal battles and court injunctions<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Bipartisan support for a ban in a key House committee vote last week set the process in motion. TikTok launched a ferocious lobbying effort, encouraging its video makers to contact their congressional representatives through push alerts. Most of it backfired. TikTok was accused by the Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party of \"lying to its users and using them to lobby Congress to benefit a foreign adversary.\" The committee was co-authored by Representatives Raja Krishnamoorthi, an Illinois Democrat, and Mike Gallagher, a Republican from Wisconsin. Nothing in Washington, including the TikTok ban, is ever as straightforward or obvious as it first appears. First, a group of legislators from both parties oppose it. Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, a libertarian Republican who opposes government intervention in business, particularly with Chinese-owned social media companies, finds it offensive. Many liberals, including the inventor herself, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, dislike it as well because they believe it would restrict the freedom of speech of youth and because they are wary of the China hawks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Global impact of a TikTok ban<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump had a meeting with Jeff Yass, the millionaire co-founder of Susquehanna International Group, a company that owns 15% of ByteDance and a significant Republican donor. Trump had changed his tune by Monday. During a phone interview with CNBC, he stated, \"A lot of people love TikTok.\" \"Many young children on TikTok will go insane without it.\" Ironically, the number of lawmakers seeking to put a ban on TikTok with conflicting agendas and large egos may be the largest hurdle to such a measure. While several senators have already begun to voice their disapproval of the House approach, no counterpart bill has been introduced in the Senate. It is anticipated that Senator Maria Cantwell, a Democrat from Washington, would eventually lead the charge on a TikTok law. Easter break is coming up soon. The legislative procedure is going to take longer. Politicians from both parties are also concerned about upsetting young people by interfering with their preferred app, especially with elections coming up.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Public opinion and political dynamics<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

While there is pressure for a TikTok ban, a forced divestment may be more plausible. Or the altercation can go like a well-known Washington narrative: a major altercation, loud headlines, and then nothing. TikTok is like dry tinder waiting to catch fire every time it comes up. However, it always fizzles out, and it will most likely do so once more in this instance. The issue is that it's hard to get an agreement on a single issue when everyone has a plan. There is a more localized worry, even if politicians will undoubtedly consider the business and international policy ramifications of outlawing TikTok. It's become commonplace to call an election after the hottest platform of the day since politicians use social media every election cycle to try to win over young people.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion,  One may make a compelling argument for the TikTok Election 2024. Every month, almost 170 million Americans use the app. About one-third of US individuals under 30 and roughly 43% of TikTok users say they routinely obtain their news from the platform, which is twice as many as three years ago, according to the Pew Research Center.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Slow roll: The uncertain fate of a TikTok ban","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"slow-roll-the-uncertain-fate-of-a-tiktok-ban","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6916","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6913,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-13 18:13:25","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-13 18:13:25","post_content":"\n

Legislators seeking to increase scrutiny are prompting lobbying companies in Washington to quickly withdraw their clients from China. The drive follows rising worries about China's influence and a recent spike in Chinese lobbying. The goal of legislators is to stop the People's Liberation Army (PLA) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)<\/a> from surreptitiously advancing agendas that undermine the interests of the American people by using legal loopholes. Senator John Cornyn, a Republican, told VOA's Mandarin Service that senators are almost done working on legislation that attempts to solve the issue. Members of the House have filed a bill to expose the exposing Foreign Influence in Lobbying Act, which was approved by the Senate last year. Cornyn co-sponsored the Senate legislation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The evolving landscape of US-China relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

\"Although there has been some opposition, we will keep working because it's critical to know who is genuinely influencing these legislators,\" Cornyn stated. Ensuring that individuals register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act has been the main priority. As you are aware, there have been several issues raised by persons failing to declare their lobbying agreements with foreign governments. Legislators are attempting to enact legislation that would close loopholes in the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 (LDA) and the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938 (FARA) in order to require greater transparency regarding foreign governments and political parties that engage in the organization, management, control, or supervision of lobbying efforts, whether or not they have received financial contributions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Scrutiny intensifies on lobbying practices<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

According to Cornyn, China presents a special difficulty. He remarked, \"The Chinese are unique in that they are forced to share information with the PLA and with their intelligence agencies; they do not have a true solely private sector.\" Thus, I would suggest that there should always be care when working with Chinese-owned businesses. The LDA, which mandates disclosure of domestic lobbying, and the FARA, which mandates disclosure of lobbying and other kinds of influence by foreign governments and political parties, control lobbying in the United States. But in 1995, FARA was changed to exclude people or firms representing foreigners if their activity isn't meant to help a foreign government or political party. Lobbyists consequently registered under the far less transparent LDA, which led to a sharp decline in FARA registrations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbyists navigate complex legal and ethical terrain<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The U.S. Department of Defense released the 1260H list, a list of \"Chinese military companies\" that operate directly or indirectly in the United States, in late January. This move prompted efforts to increase the inspection of China's lobbying operations. After that, lawmakers said that they were thinking of passing a bill that would make it illegal for lobbyists representing businesses on the list to meet with members of Congress, not even to address issues on behalf of their American clients. A chart that listed several Chinese enterprises, including some military firms, along with the names of their lobbying firms and whether or not they were included on the 1260H list started to circulate on Capitol Hill after the 1260H list was released. According to Robert Sutter, a professor of international affairs practice at George Washington University's Elliott School, Chinese military organizations' lobbying operations have traditionally been vague, and enforcement has been lax.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rising concerns over reputation and risk<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

As of late February, at least five American lobbying companies had lost Chinese business. Steptoe LLP and BGI, a Shenzhen biotech company, have ended their business relationship. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld ended its partnership with Xiaomi, a Chinese electronics business not on the 1260H list, and filed cease-and-desist filings to halt advocating for Hesai Group, a Chinese manufacturer of LiDARs. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Additionally, the Vogel Group has ceased lobbying on behalf of Complete Genomics, a division of BGI, a genetic technology business, and DJI, a Chinese drone manufacturer. Hesai and DJI are both included in the 1260H list. While its former parent firm, BGI, is on the list, Complete Genomics is not. While it is challenging to enact legislation that forbids Congressmen from meeting with anybody, Republican Senator Marco Rubio told VOA that certain congressional offices have made the decision to forgo meetings with lobbying firms that represent Chinese defense businesses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Chinese business lobbying in Washington was virtually nonexistent until a few years ago, according to Craig Singleton, a senior researcher at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, but that all changed when the US government started pursuing Huawei. According to Singleton, there is room for improvement in the Department of Justice's involvement in limiting the CCP's negative lobbying effect on Capitol Hill. The Department of Justice is in charge of implementing and upholding FARA.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US lobbyists reevaluate ties: Shedding Chinese clients amid heightened oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-lobbyists-reevaluate-ties-shedding-chinese-clients-amid-heightened-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6913","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6902,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_content":"\n

After an Alabama judge deemed frozen embryos to be children, Democrats attempted in vain to ram legislation through the U.S. Senate that would have guaranteed Americans' access to IVF and other assisted reproductive technologies. At least three Alabama IVF clinics stopped doing IVF, which combines eggs and sperm in a lab dish for infertile couples, after the state Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos should be treated like children. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Challenges in the courtroom<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Because nonviable embryos are occasionally discarded or utilized for research, the Alabama court's decision has sparked worries that anyone participating in IVF may be prosecuted, and that it may also inspire other states to take similar legal action. Sen. Tammy Duckworth<\/a>, a Democrat and veteran of the Iraq War who was seriously injured in battle in 2004; she requested that the Senate take up her \"Access to Family Building Act\" legislation right now. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Alabama Supreme Court's decision last month that frozen embryos were lawfully regarded infants sparked fresh requests for federal safeguards for reproductive therapies, which led to the IVF business CooperSurgical filing. The decision, which caused some clinics in Alabama to stop IVF procedures, has set up a nationwide IVF firestorm. As the election draws near, Democrats are hammering Republicans on the matter, while the GOP is rushing to take positions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbying in Washington<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Thorn Run Partners, a Washington-based company licensed to effectively advocate on \"Fertility\" and \"Maternal Health,\" was engaged by CooperSurgical. This week, lawmakers in Alabama's Republican-controlled legislature passed a bill to safeguard IVF procedures. However, conservatives swiftly prevented the Senate from adopting the first federal policy. The Alabama Wrongful Death of a Minor Act made the destruction of embryos illegal, according to the court's ruling in that state's case. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Families alleging CooperSurgical caused the loss of their embryos are suing the corporation for undisclosed damages in many jurisdictions over identical allegations. CooperSurgical representative Adeena Fried responded, \"The company wanted to see that IVF remains accessible nationwide,\" when questioned about the choice to lobby. \"Our goal is to guarantee that the greatest goods and innovations can be utilized in Alabama and throughout the country to strengthen families and welcome new members into the world,\" the spokesperson stated. \"As of right now, a lot of clinics in Alabama are closed, and legislation nationwide needs to support the entire fertility industry.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The role of lobbying in reproductive technology<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In a similar vein, GenBioPro, a different reproductive health care firm, which manufactures mifepristone generically, approached Washington following a siege of their product. In 2022, a lobbying firm filed to represent the company, and the following year, GenBioPro filed a lawsuit against the FDA to maintain the drug's availability. CooperSurgical, a Connecticut-based corporation, recruited three seasoned Hill staffers, one of which was Jessie Brairton, a former Eli Lilly lobbyist and staff member of Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas). The other two lobbyists are Jacky Usyk, a veteran Democratic Senate assistant, and Andrew Rosenberg, a former aide to Sen. Ed Kennedy (D-Mass.), who co-founded the company. Federal filings state that CooperSurgical has not previously registered to lobby. Beasley met with Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra on Tuesday to talk about the turmoil and uncertainty caused by the Alabama Supreme Court decision that threatens IVF, as well as other individuals impacted by the decision. It caused many people's reproductive treatments to come to an abrupt halt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Balancing profit and patient welfare<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Every woman present at the discussion discussed the intense psychological stress and loneliness associated with receiving reproductive therapy. The epidemic had already caused some of them to have their reproductive treatments interrupted, only for the Supreme Court's ruling to throw them off course once again. According to fertility patient and nurse practitioner Kendall Diebold, \"the IVF world as a whole is so isolating and lonely.\" \"And all of that has really been taken by this, and it has just been magnified and filled with sadness, grief, and anger.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Internal medicine specialist Dr. Rachel Charles, who also has lupus, talked about the rigorous treatment plan she had to follow in order to do IVF and get ready for an embryo transfer. Rather than move on with an embryo transfer, she made the decision in February to take a break from the daily hormone injections. In a previous interview, Rebecca Mathews, 36, who is the mother of two IVF-conceived children, told The 19th that she was shocked and angry at the same time when she learned of the decision. She still has a frozen embryo and is unsure of what to do with it.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating legal turmoil: IVF company registers to lobby Washington","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-legal-turmoil-ivf-company-registers-to-lobby-washington","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6902","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6871,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_date_gmt":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_content":"\n

The Biden administration<\/a> remained dedicated to its alliances in the strategically significant Indo-Pacific area, one day after a US$95 billion <\/a>foreign assistance package omitted economic help pledged for the region as the US strives to counter China's influence there. We at the White House<\/a> and State Department are still in favor of funding authorization and appropriation. Deputy assistant secretary Camille Dawson of the US State Department stated, \"We feel it's critically important to continue working in close concert and in support of the freely associated states<\/a>,\" referring to the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau. Dawson said this in answer to a query from the Post at a press conference on the second anniversary of US President Joe Biden's Indo-Pacific Strategy announcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Navigating a Strategic Landscape<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The agreement is viewed as critical to Washington's efforts to sustain<\/a> its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken once declared that \"our planet's future will be written,\" despite growing concerns<\/a> about what some have called Beijing's coercive influence campaign.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That tactic may have its roots in the Compact of Free Association (Cofa), an agreement<\/a> that has guided US relations with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau for many years. First signed in 1986, the Cofa accord provides financial help and a legal framework<\/a> allowing its residents to live, work, and attend school in the United States in exchange for the US military having access to the land, air, and sea of the three Pacific island<\/a> nations. While Palau's Cofa program is scheduled to expire in September, that of the Marshall Islands and Micronesia expired on September 30. Last year, new agreements were established and extended, and Biden promised the three nations US$7.1 billion<\/a> spread over 20 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

The congressmen claim that ByteDance is under the control of the Chinese government, which has the right to request access at any time to the data of TikTok users in the United States. The source of the concern is a series of national security legislation in China that require firms to cooperate with intelligence collection. The main conflict in Washington right now isn't between Joe Biden and Donald Trump. Politicians who wish to prohibit TikTok or compel its sale are at odds with those who wish to keep the well-known social media site unaltered. This problem in Washington, unlike most others, does not fall neatly into the Republican or Democratic camps. Trump chose to fight. During his presidency, he attempted to convince ByteDance Ltd., the company's Beijing-based owner of TikTok, to sell the business or risk a nationwide ban by using national security as a pretext. \"He perceived it as a means of penalizing China for the Covid-19 outbreak,\" states Stephen Myrow, the managing partner of Beacon Policy Advisors, a research organization that monitors the problem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Legal battles and court injunctions<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Bipartisan support for a ban in a key House committee vote last week set the process in motion. TikTok launched a ferocious lobbying effort, encouraging its video makers to contact their congressional representatives through push alerts. Most of it backfired. TikTok was accused by the Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party of \"lying to its users and using them to lobby Congress to benefit a foreign adversary.\" The committee was co-authored by Representatives Raja Krishnamoorthi, an Illinois Democrat, and Mike Gallagher, a Republican from Wisconsin. Nothing in Washington, including the TikTok ban, is ever as straightforward or obvious as it first appears. First, a group of legislators from both parties oppose it. Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, a libertarian Republican who opposes government intervention in business, particularly with Chinese-owned social media companies, finds it offensive. Many liberals, including the inventor herself, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, dislike it as well because they believe it would restrict the freedom of speech of youth and because they are wary of the China hawks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Global impact of a TikTok ban<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump had a meeting with Jeff Yass, the millionaire co-founder of Susquehanna International Group, a company that owns 15% of ByteDance and a significant Republican donor. Trump had changed his tune by Monday. During a phone interview with CNBC, he stated, \"A lot of people love TikTok.\" \"Many young children on TikTok will go insane without it.\" Ironically, the number of lawmakers seeking to put a ban on TikTok with conflicting agendas and large egos may be the largest hurdle to such a measure. While several senators have already begun to voice their disapproval of the House approach, no counterpart bill has been introduced in the Senate. It is anticipated that Senator Maria Cantwell, a Democrat from Washington, would eventually lead the charge on a TikTok law. Easter break is coming up soon. The legislative procedure is going to take longer. Politicians from both parties are also concerned about upsetting young people by interfering with their preferred app, especially with elections coming up.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Public opinion and political dynamics<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

While there is pressure for a TikTok ban, a forced divestment may be more plausible. Or the altercation can go like a well-known Washington narrative: a major altercation, loud headlines, and then nothing. TikTok is like dry tinder waiting to catch fire every time it comes up. However, it always fizzles out, and it will most likely do so once more in this instance. The issue is that it's hard to get an agreement on a single issue when everyone has a plan. There is a more localized worry, even if politicians will undoubtedly consider the business and international policy ramifications of outlawing TikTok. It's become commonplace to call an election after the hottest platform of the day since politicians use social media every election cycle to try to win over young people.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion,  One may make a compelling argument for the TikTok Election 2024. Every month, almost 170 million Americans use the app. About one-third of US individuals under 30 and roughly 43% of TikTok users say they routinely obtain their news from the platform, which is twice as many as three years ago, according to the Pew Research Center.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Slow roll: The uncertain fate of a TikTok ban","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"slow-roll-the-uncertain-fate-of-a-tiktok-ban","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6916","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6913,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-13 18:13:25","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-13 18:13:25","post_content":"\n

Legislators seeking to increase scrutiny are prompting lobbying companies in Washington to quickly withdraw their clients from China. The drive follows rising worries about China's influence and a recent spike in Chinese lobbying. The goal of legislators is to stop the People's Liberation Army (PLA) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)<\/a> from surreptitiously advancing agendas that undermine the interests of the American people by using legal loopholes. Senator John Cornyn, a Republican, told VOA's Mandarin Service that senators are almost done working on legislation that attempts to solve the issue. Members of the House have filed a bill to expose the exposing Foreign Influence in Lobbying Act, which was approved by the Senate last year. Cornyn co-sponsored the Senate legislation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The evolving landscape of US-China relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

\"Although there has been some opposition, we will keep working because it's critical to know who is genuinely influencing these legislators,\" Cornyn stated. Ensuring that individuals register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act has been the main priority. As you are aware, there have been several issues raised by persons failing to declare their lobbying agreements with foreign governments. Legislators are attempting to enact legislation that would close loopholes in the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 (LDA) and the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938 (FARA) in order to require greater transparency regarding foreign governments and political parties that engage in the organization, management, control, or supervision of lobbying efforts, whether or not they have received financial contributions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Scrutiny intensifies on lobbying practices<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

According to Cornyn, China presents a special difficulty. He remarked, \"The Chinese are unique in that they are forced to share information with the PLA and with their intelligence agencies; they do not have a true solely private sector.\" Thus, I would suggest that there should always be care when working with Chinese-owned businesses. The LDA, which mandates disclosure of domestic lobbying, and the FARA, which mandates disclosure of lobbying and other kinds of influence by foreign governments and political parties, control lobbying in the United States. But in 1995, FARA was changed to exclude people or firms representing foreigners if their activity isn't meant to help a foreign government or political party. Lobbyists consequently registered under the far less transparent LDA, which led to a sharp decline in FARA registrations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbyists navigate complex legal and ethical terrain<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The U.S. Department of Defense released the 1260H list, a list of \"Chinese military companies\" that operate directly or indirectly in the United States, in late January. This move prompted efforts to increase the inspection of China's lobbying operations. After that, lawmakers said that they were thinking of passing a bill that would make it illegal for lobbyists representing businesses on the list to meet with members of Congress, not even to address issues on behalf of their American clients. A chart that listed several Chinese enterprises, including some military firms, along with the names of their lobbying firms and whether or not they were included on the 1260H list started to circulate on Capitol Hill after the 1260H list was released. According to Robert Sutter, a professor of international affairs practice at George Washington University's Elliott School, Chinese military organizations' lobbying operations have traditionally been vague, and enforcement has been lax.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rising concerns over reputation and risk<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

As of late February, at least five American lobbying companies had lost Chinese business. Steptoe LLP and BGI, a Shenzhen biotech company, have ended their business relationship. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld ended its partnership with Xiaomi, a Chinese electronics business not on the 1260H list, and filed cease-and-desist filings to halt advocating for Hesai Group, a Chinese manufacturer of LiDARs. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Additionally, the Vogel Group has ceased lobbying on behalf of Complete Genomics, a division of BGI, a genetic technology business, and DJI, a Chinese drone manufacturer. Hesai and DJI are both included in the 1260H list. While its former parent firm, BGI, is on the list, Complete Genomics is not. While it is challenging to enact legislation that forbids Congressmen from meeting with anybody, Republican Senator Marco Rubio told VOA that certain congressional offices have made the decision to forgo meetings with lobbying firms that represent Chinese defense businesses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Chinese business lobbying in Washington was virtually nonexistent until a few years ago, according to Craig Singleton, a senior researcher at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, but that all changed when the US government started pursuing Huawei. According to Singleton, there is room for improvement in the Department of Justice's involvement in limiting the CCP's negative lobbying effect on Capitol Hill. The Department of Justice is in charge of implementing and upholding FARA.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US lobbyists reevaluate ties: Shedding Chinese clients amid heightened oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-lobbyists-reevaluate-ties-shedding-chinese-clients-amid-heightened-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6913","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6902,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_content":"\n

After an Alabama judge deemed frozen embryos to be children, Democrats attempted in vain to ram legislation through the U.S. Senate that would have guaranteed Americans' access to IVF and other assisted reproductive technologies. At least three Alabama IVF clinics stopped doing IVF, which combines eggs and sperm in a lab dish for infertile couples, after the state Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos should be treated like children. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Challenges in the courtroom<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Because nonviable embryos are occasionally discarded or utilized for research, the Alabama court's decision has sparked worries that anyone participating in IVF may be prosecuted, and that it may also inspire other states to take similar legal action. Sen. Tammy Duckworth<\/a>, a Democrat and veteran of the Iraq War who was seriously injured in battle in 2004; she requested that the Senate take up her \"Access to Family Building Act\" legislation right now. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Alabama Supreme Court's decision last month that frozen embryos were lawfully regarded infants sparked fresh requests for federal safeguards for reproductive therapies, which led to the IVF business CooperSurgical filing. The decision, which caused some clinics in Alabama to stop IVF procedures, has set up a nationwide IVF firestorm. As the election draws near, Democrats are hammering Republicans on the matter, while the GOP is rushing to take positions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbying in Washington<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Thorn Run Partners, a Washington-based company licensed to effectively advocate on \"Fertility\" and \"Maternal Health,\" was engaged by CooperSurgical. This week, lawmakers in Alabama's Republican-controlled legislature passed a bill to safeguard IVF procedures. However, conservatives swiftly prevented the Senate from adopting the first federal policy. The Alabama Wrongful Death of a Minor Act made the destruction of embryos illegal, according to the court's ruling in that state's case. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Families alleging CooperSurgical caused the loss of their embryos are suing the corporation for undisclosed damages in many jurisdictions over identical allegations. CooperSurgical representative Adeena Fried responded, \"The company wanted to see that IVF remains accessible nationwide,\" when questioned about the choice to lobby. \"Our goal is to guarantee that the greatest goods and innovations can be utilized in Alabama and throughout the country to strengthen families and welcome new members into the world,\" the spokesperson stated. \"As of right now, a lot of clinics in Alabama are closed, and legislation nationwide needs to support the entire fertility industry.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The role of lobbying in reproductive technology<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In a similar vein, GenBioPro, a different reproductive health care firm, which manufactures mifepristone generically, approached Washington following a siege of their product. In 2022, a lobbying firm filed to represent the company, and the following year, GenBioPro filed a lawsuit against the FDA to maintain the drug's availability. CooperSurgical, a Connecticut-based corporation, recruited three seasoned Hill staffers, one of which was Jessie Brairton, a former Eli Lilly lobbyist and staff member of Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas). The other two lobbyists are Jacky Usyk, a veteran Democratic Senate assistant, and Andrew Rosenberg, a former aide to Sen. Ed Kennedy (D-Mass.), who co-founded the company. Federal filings state that CooperSurgical has not previously registered to lobby. Beasley met with Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra on Tuesday to talk about the turmoil and uncertainty caused by the Alabama Supreme Court decision that threatens IVF, as well as other individuals impacted by the decision. It caused many people's reproductive treatments to come to an abrupt halt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Balancing profit and patient welfare<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Every woman present at the discussion discussed the intense psychological stress and loneliness associated with receiving reproductive therapy. The epidemic had already caused some of them to have their reproductive treatments interrupted, only for the Supreme Court's ruling to throw them off course once again. According to fertility patient and nurse practitioner Kendall Diebold, \"the IVF world as a whole is so isolating and lonely.\" \"And all of that has really been taken by this, and it has just been magnified and filled with sadness, grief, and anger.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Internal medicine specialist Dr. Rachel Charles, who also has lupus, talked about the rigorous treatment plan she had to follow in order to do IVF and get ready for an embryo transfer. Rather than move on with an embryo transfer, she made the decision in February to take a break from the daily hormone injections. In a previous interview, Rebecca Mathews, 36, who is the mother of two IVF-conceived children, told The 19th that she was shocked and angry at the same time when she learned of the decision. She still has a frozen embryo and is unsure of what to do with it.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating legal turmoil: IVF company registers to lobby Washington","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-legal-turmoil-ivf-company-registers-to-lobby-washington","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6902","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6871,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_date_gmt":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_content":"\n

The Biden administration<\/a> remained dedicated to its alliances in the strategically significant Indo-Pacific area, one day after a US$95 billion <\/a>foreign assistance package omitted economic help pledged for the region as the US strives to counter China's influence there. We at the White House<\/a> and State Department are still in favor of funding authorization and appropriation. Deputy assistant secretary Camille Dawson of the US State Department stated, \"We feel it's critically important to continue working in close concert and in support of the freely associated states<\/a>,\" referring to the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau. Dawson said this in answer to a query from the Post at a press conference on the second anniversary of US President Joe Biden's Indo-Pacific Strategy announcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Navigating a Strategic Landscape<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The agreement is viewed as critical to Washington's efforts to sustain<\/a> its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken once declared that \"our planet's future will be written,\" despite growing concerns<\/a> about what some have called Beijing's coercive influence campaign.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That tactic may have its roots in the Compact of Free Association (Cofa), an agreement<\/a> that has guided US relations with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau for many years. First signed in 1986, the Cofa accord provides financial help and a legal framework<\/a> allowing its residents to live, work, and attend school in the United States in exchange for the US military having access to the land, air, and sea of the three Pacific island<\/a> nations. While Palau's Cofa program is scheduled to expire in September, that of the Marshall Islands and Micronesia expired on September 30. Last year, new agreements were established and extended, and Biden promised the three nations US$7.1 billion<\/a> spread over 20 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Legal and regulatory hurdles<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The congressmen claim that ByteDance is under the control of the Chinese government, which has the right to request access at any time to the data of TikTok users in the United States. The source of the concern is a series of national security legislation in China that require firms to cooperate with intelligence collection. The main conflict in Washington right now isn't between Joe Biden and Donald Trump. Politicians who wish to prohibit TikTok or compel its sale are at odds with those who wish to keep the well-known social media site unaltered. This problem in Washington, unlike most others, does not fall neatly into the Republican or Democratic camps. Trump chose to fight. During his presidency, he attempted to convince ByteDance Ltd., the company's Beijing-based owner of TikTok, to sell the business or risk a nationwide ban by using national security as a pretext. \"He perceived it as a means of penalizing China for the Covid-19 outbreak,\" states Stephen Myrow, the managing partner of Beacon Policy Advisors, a research organization that monitors the problem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Legal battles and court injunctions<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Bipartisan support for a ban in a key House committee vote last week set the process in motion. TikTok launched a ferocious lobbying effort, encouraging its video makers to contact their congressional representatives through push alerts. Most of it backfired. TikTok was accused by the Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party of \"lying to its users and using them to lobby Congress to benefit a foreign adversary.\" The committee was co-authored by Representatives Raja Krishnamoorthi, an Illinois Democrat, and Mike Gallagher, a Republican from Wisconsin. Nothing in Washington, including the TikTok ban, is ever as straightforward or obvious as it first appears. First, a group of legislators from both parties oppose it. Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, a libertarian Republican who opposes government intervention in business, particularly with Chinese-owned social media companies, finds it offensive. Many liberals, including the inventor herself, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, dislike it as well because they believe it would restrict the freedom of speech of youth and because they are wary of the China hawks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Global impact of a TikTok ban<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump had a meeting with Jeff Yass, the millionaire co-founder of Susquehanna International Group, a company that owns 15% of ByteDance and a significant Republican donor. Trump had changed his tune by Monday. During a phone interview with CNBC, he stated, \"A lot of people love TikTok.\" \"Many young children on TikTok will go insane without it.\" Ironically, the number of lawmakers seeking to put a ban on TikTok with conflicting agendas and large egos may be the largest hurdle to such a measure. While several senators have already begun to voice their disapproval of the House approach, no counterpart bill has been introduced in the Senate. It is anticipated that Senator Maria Cantwell, a Democrat from Washington, would eventually lead the charge on a TikTok law. Easter break is coming up soon. The legislative procedure is going to take longer. Politicians from both parties are also concerned about upsetting young people by interfering with their preferred app, especially with elections coming up.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Public opinion and political dynamics<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

While there is pressure for a TikTok ban, a forced divestment may be more plausible. Or the altercation can go like a well-known Washington narrative: a major altercation, loud headlines, and then nothing. TikTok is like dry tinder waiting to catch fire every time it comes up. However, it always fizzles out, and it will most likely do so once more in this instance. The issue is that it's hard to get an agreement on a single issue when everyone has a plan. There is a more localized worry, even if politicians will undoubtedly consider the business and international policy ramifications of outlawing TikTok. It's become commonplace to call an election after the hottest platform of the day since politicians use social media every election cycle to try to win over young people.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion,  One may make a compelling argument for the TikTok Election 2024. Every month, almost 170 million Americans use the app. About one-third of US individuals under 30 and roughly 43% of TikTok users say they routinely obtain their news from the platform, which is twice as many as three years ago, according to the Pew Research Center.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Slow roll: The uncertain fate of a TikTok ban","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"slow-roll-the-uncertain-fate-of-a-tiktok-ban","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6916","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6913,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-13 18:13:25","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-13 18:13:25","post_content":"\n

Legislators seeking to increase scrutiny are prompting lobbying companies in Washington to quickly withdraw their clients from China. The drive follows rising worries about China's influence and a recent spike in Chinese lobbying. The goal of legislators is to stop the People's Liberation Army (PLA) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)<\/a> from surreptitiously advancing agendas that undermine the interests of the American people by using legal loopholes. Senator John Cornyn, a Republican, told VOA's Mandarin Service that senators are almost done working on legislation that attempts to solve the issue. Members of the House have filed a bill to expose the exposing Foreign Influence in Lobbying Act, which was approved by the Senate last year. Cornyn co-sponsored the Senate legislation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The evolving landscape of US-China relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

\"Although there has been some opposition, we will keep working because it's critical to know who is genuinely influencing these legislators,\" Cornyn stated. Ensuring that individuals register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act has been the main priority. As you are aware, there have been several issues raised by persons failing to declare their lobbying agreements with foreign governments. Legislators are attempting to enact legislation that would close loopholes in the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 (LDA) and the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938 (FARA) in order to require greater transparency regarding foreign governments and political parties that engage in the organization, management, control, or supervision of lobbying efforts, whether or not they have received financial contributions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Scrutiny intensifies on lobbying practices<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

According to Cornyn, China presents a special difficulty. He remarked, \"The Chinese are unique in that they are forced to share information with the PLA and with their intelligence agencies; they do not have a true solely private sector.\" Thus, I would suggest that there should always be care when working with Chinese-owned businesses. The LDA, which mandates disclosure of domestic lobbying, and the FARA, which mandates disclosure of lobbying and other kinds of influence by foreign governments and political parties, control lobbying in the United States. But in 1995, FARA was changed to exclude people or firms representing foreigners if their activity isn't meant to help a foreign government or political party. Lobbyists consequently registered under the far less transparent LDA, which led to a sharp decline in FARA registrations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbyists navigate complex legal and ethical terrain<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The U.S. Department of Defense released the 1260H list, a list of \"Chinese military companies\" that operate directly or indirectly in the United States, in late January. This move prompted efforts to increase the inspection of China's lobbying operations. After that, lawmakers said that they were thinking of passing a bill that would make it illegal for lobbyists representing businesses on the list to meet with members of Congress, not even to address issues on behalf of their American clients. A chart that listed several Chinese enterprises, including some military firms, along with the names of their lobbying firms and whether or not they were included on the 1260H list started to circulate on Capitol Hill after the 1260H list was released. According to Robert Sutter, a professor of international affairs practice at George Washington University's Elliott School, Chinese military organizations' lobbying operations have traditionally been vague, and enforcement has been lax.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rising concerns over reputation and risk<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

As of late February, at least five American lobbying companies had lost Chinese business. Steptoe LLP and BGI, a Shenzhen biotech company, have ended their business relationship. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld ended its partnership with Xiaomi, a Chinese electronics business not on the 1260H list, and filed cease-and-desist filings to halt advocating for Hesai Group, a Chinese manufacturer of LiDARs. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Additionally, the Vogel Group has ceased lobbying on behalf of Complete Genomics, a division of BGI, a genetic technology business, and DJI, a Chinese drone manufacturer. Hesai and DJI are both included in the 1260H list. While its former parent firm, BGI, is on the list, Complete Genomics is not. While it is challenging to enact legislation that forbids Congressmen from meeting with anybody, Republican Senator Marco Rubio told VOA that certain congressional offices have made the decision to forgo meetings with lobbying firms that represent Chinese defense businesses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Chinese business lobbying in Washington was virtually nonexistent until a few years ago, according to Craig Singleton, a senior researcher at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, but that all changed when the US government started pursuing Huawei. According to Singleton, there is room for improvement in the Department of Justice's involvement in limiting the CCP's negative lobbying effect on Capitol Hill. The Department of Justice is in charge of implementing and upholding FARA.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US lobbyists reevaluate ties: Shedding Chinese clients amid heightened oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-lobbyists-reevaluate-ties-shedding-chinese-clients-amid-heightened-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6913","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6902,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_content":"\n

After an Alabama judge deemed frozen embryos to be children, Democrats attempted in vain to ram legislation through the U.S. Senate that would have guaranteed Americans' access to IVF and other assisted reproductive technologies. At least three Alabama IVF clinics stopped doing IVF, which combines eggs and sperm in a lab dish for infertile couples, after the state Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos should be treated like children. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Challenges in the courtroom<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Because nonviable embryos are occasionally discarded or utilized for research, the Alabama court's decision has sparked worries that anyone participating in IVF may be prosecuted, and that it may also inspire other states to take similar legal action. Sen. Tammy Duckworth<\/a>, a Democrat and veteran of the Iraq War who was seriously injured in battle in 2004; she requested that the Senate take up her \"Access to Family Building Act\" legislation right now. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Alabama Supreme Court's decision last month that frozen embryos were lawfully regarded infants sparked fresh requests for federal safeguards for reproductive therapies, which led to the IVF business CooperSurgical filing. The decision, which caused some clinics in Alabama to stop IVF procedures, has set up a nationwide IVF firestorm. As the election draws near, Democrats are hammering Republicans on the matter, while the GOP is rushing to take positions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbying in Washington<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Thorn Run Partners, a Washington-based company licensed to effectively advocate on \"Fertility\" and \"Maternal Health,\" was engaged by CooperSurgical. This week, lawmakers in Alabama's Republican-controlled legislature passed a bill to safeguard IVF procedures. However, conservatives swiftly prevented the Senate from adopting the first federal policy. The Alabama Wrongful Death of a Minor Act made the destruction of embryos illegal, according to the court's ruling in that state's case. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Families alleging CooperSurgical caused the loss of their embryos are suing the corporation for undisclosed damages in many jurisdictions over identical allegations. CooperSurgical representative Adeena Fried responded, \"The company wanted to see that IVF remains accessible nationwide,\" when questioned about the choice to lobby. \"Our goal is to guarantee that the greatest goods and innovations can be utilized in Alabama and throughout the country to strengthen families and welcome new members into the world,\" the spokesperson stated. \"As of right now, a lot of clinics in Alabama are closed, and legislation nationwide needs to support the entire fertility industry.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The role of lobbying in reproductive technology<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In a similar vein, GenBioPro, a different reproductive health care firm, which manufactures mifepristone generically, approached Washington following a siege of their product. In 2022, a lobbying firm filed to represent the company, and the following year, GenBioPro filed a lawsuit against the FDA to maintain the drug's availability. CooperSurgical, a Connecticut-based corporation, recruited three seasoned Hill staffers, one of which was Jessie Brairton, a former Eli Lilly lobbyist and staff member of Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas). The other two lobbyists are Jacky Usyk, a veteran Democratic Senate assistant, and Andrew Rosenberg, a former aide to Sen. Ed Kennedy (D-Mass.), who co-founded the company. Federal filings state that CooperSurgical has not previously registered to lobby. Beasley met with Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra on Tuesday to talk about the turmoil and uncertainty caused by the Alabama Supreme Court decision that threatens IVF, as well as other individuals impacted by the decision. It caused many people's reproductive treatments to come to an abrupt halt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Balancing profit and patient welfare<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Every woman present at the discussion discussed the intense psychological stress and loneliness associated with receiving reproductive therapy. The epidemic had already caused some of them to have their reproductive treatments interrupted, only for the Supreme Court's ruling to throw them off course once again. According to fertility patient and nurse practitioner Kendall Diebold, \"the IVF world as a whole is so isolating and lonely.\" \"And all of that has really been taken by this, and it has just been magnified and filled with sadness, grief, and anger.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Internal medicine specialist Dr. Rachel Charles, who also has lupus, talked about the rigorous treatment plan she had to follow in order to do IVF and get ready for an embryo transfer. Rather than move on with an embryo transfer, she made the decision in February to take a break from the daily hormone injections. In a previous interview, Rebecca Mathews, 36, who is the mother of two IVF-conceived children, told The 19th that she was shocked and angry at the same time when she learned of the decision. She still has a frozen embryo and is unsure of what to do with it.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating legal turmoil: IVF company registers to lobby Washington","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-legal-turmoil-ivf-company-registers-to-lobby-washington","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6902","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6871,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_date_gmt":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_content":"\n

The Biden administration<\/a> remained dedicated to its alliances in the strategically significant Indo-Pacific area, one day after a US$95 billion <\/a>foreign assistance package omitted economic help pledged for the region as the US strives to counter China's influence there. We at the White House<\/a> and State Department are still in favor of funding authorization and appropriation. Deputy assistant secretary Camille Dawson of the US State Department stated, \"We feel it's critically important to continue working in close concert and in support of the freely associated states<\/a>,\" referring to the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau. Dawson said this in answer to a query from the Post at a press conference on the second anniversary of US President Joe Biden's Indo-Pacific Strategy announcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Navigating a Strategic Landscape<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The agreement is viewed as critical to Washington's efforts to sustain<\/a> its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken once declared that \"our planet's future will be written,\" despite growing concerns<\/a> about what some have called Beijing's coercive influence campaign.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That tactic may have its roots in the Compact of Free Association (Cofa), an agreement<\/a> that has guided US relations with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau for many years. First signed in 1986, the Cofa accord provides financial help and a legal framework<\/a> allowing its residents to live, work, and attend school in the United States in exchange for the US military having access to the land, air, and sea of the three Pacific island<\/a> nations. While Palau's Cofa program is scheduled to expire in September, that of the Marshall Islands and Micronesia expired on September 30. Last year, new agreements were established and extended, and Biden promised the three nations US$7.1 billion<\/a> spread over 20 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

A measure that would force the popular video app TikTok to be banned nationally if its Chinese owner does not sell its shares was passed by the House. The MPs took action because they believed that the company's present ownership structure posed a threat to national security. After passing by a vote of 352-65<\/a>, the bill now moves on to the Senate, where its future is uncertain. With over 170 million users in the United States, TikTok is a fully-owned subsidiary of ByteDance Ltd., a Chinese technology company.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Legal and regulatory hurdles<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The congressmen claim that ByteDance is under the control of the Chinese government, which has the right to request access at any time to the data of TikTok users in the United States. The source of the concern is a series of national security legislation in China that require firms to cooperate with intelligence collection. The main conflict in Washington right now isn't between Joe Biden and Donald Trump. Politicians who wish to prohibit TikTok or compel its sale are at odds with those who wish to keep the well-known social media site unaltered. This problem in Washington, unlike most others, does not fall neatly into the Republican or Democratic camps. Trump chose to fight. During his presidency, he attempted to convince ByteDance Ltd., the company's Beijing-based owner of TikTok, to sell the business or risk a nationwide ban by using national security as a pretext. \"He perceived it as a means of penalizing China for the Covid-19 outbreak,\" states Stephen Myrow, the managing partner of Beacon Policy Advisors, a research organization that monitors the problem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Legal battles and court injunctions<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Bipartisan support for a ban in a key House committee vote last week set the process in motion. TikTok launched a ferocious lobbying effort, encouraging its video makers to contact their congressional representatives through push alerts. Most of it backfired. TikTok was accused by the Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party of \"lying to its users and using them to lobby Congress to benefit a foreign adversary.\" The committee was co-authored by Representatives Raja Krishnamoorthi, an Illinois Democrat, and Mike Gallagher, a Republican from Wisconsin. Nothing in Washington, including the TikTok ban, is ever as straightforward or obvious as it first appears. First, a group of legislators from both parties oppose it. Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, a libertarian Republican who opposes government intervention in business, particularly with Chinese-owned social media companies, finds it offensive. Many liberals, including the inventor herself, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, dislike it as well because they believe it would restrict the freedom of speech of youth and because they are wary of the China hawks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Global impact of a TikTok ban<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump had a meeting with Jeff Yass, the millionaire co-founder of Susquehanna International Group, a company that owns 15% of ByteDance and a significant Republican donor. Trump had changed his tune by Monday. During a phone interview with CNBC, he stated, \"A lot of people love TikTok.\" \"Many young children on TikTok will go insane without it.\" Ironically, the number of lawmakers seeking to put a ban on TikTok with conflicting agendas and large egos may be the largest hurdle to such a measure. While several senators have already begun to voice their disapproval of the House approach, no counterpart bill has been introduced in the Senate. It is anticipated that Senator Maria Cantwell, a Democrat from Washington, would eventually lead the charge on a TikTok law. Easter break is coming up soon. The legislative procedure is going to take longer. Politicians from both parties are also concerned about upsetting young people by interfering with their preferred app, especially with elections coming up.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Public opinion and political dynamics<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

While there is pressure for a TikTok ban, a forced divestment may be more plausible. Or the altercation can go like a well-known Washington narrative: a major altercation, loud headlines, and then nothing. TikTok is like dry tinder waiting to catch fire every time it comes up. However, it always fizzles out, and it will most likely do so once more in this instance. The issue is that it's hard to get an agreement on a single issue when everyone has a plan. There is a more localized worry, even if politicians will undoubtedly consider the business and international policy ramifications of outlawing TikTok. It's become commonplace to call an election after the hottest platform of the day since politicians use social media every election cycle to try to win over young people.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion,  One may make a compelling argument for the TikTok Election 2024. Every month, almost 170 million Americans use the app. About one-third of US individuals under 30 and roughly 43% of TikTok users say they routinely obtain their news from the platform, which is twice as many as three years ago, according to the Pew Research Center.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Slow roll: The uncertain fate of a TikTok ban","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"slow-roll-the-uncertain-fate-of-a-tiktok-ban","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6916","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6913,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-13 18:13:25","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-13 18:13:25","post_content":"\n

Legislators seeking to increase scrutiny are prompting lobbying companies in Washington to quickly withdraw their clients from China. The drive follows rising worries about China's influence and a recent spike in Chinese lobbying. The goal of legislators is to stop the People's Liberation Army (PLA) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)<\/a> from surreptitiously advancing agendas that undermine the interests of the American people by using legal loopholes. Senator John Cornyn, a Republican, told VOA's Mandarin Service that senators are almost done working on legislation that attempts to solve the issue. Members of the House have filed a bill to expose the exposing Foreign Influence in Lobbying Act, which was approved by the Senate last year. Cornyn co-sponsored the Senate legislation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The evolving landscape of US-China relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

\"Although there has been some opposition, we will keep working because it's critical to know who is genuinely influencing these legislators,\" Cornyn stated. Ensuring that individuals register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act has been the main priority. As you are aware, there have been several issues raised by persons failing to declare their lobbying agreements with foreign governments. Legislators are attempting to enact legislation that would close loopholes in the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 (LDA) and the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938 (FARA) in order to require greater transparency regarding foreign governments and political parties that engage in the organization, management, control, or supervision of lobbying efforts, whether or not they have received financial contributions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Scrutiny intensifies on lobbying practices<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

According to Cornyn, China presents a special difficulty. He remarked, \"The Chinese are unique in that they are forced to share information with the PLA and with their intelligence agencies; they do not have a true solely private sector.\" Thus, I would suggest that there should always be care when working with Chinese-owned businesses. The LDA, which mandates disclosure of domestic lobbying, and the FARA, which mandates disclosure of lobbying and other kinds of influence by foreign governments and political parties, control lobbying in the United States. But in 1995, FARA was changed to exclude people or firms representing foreigners if their activity isn't meant to help a foreign government or political party. Lobbyists consequently registered under the far less transparent LDA, which led to a sharp decline in FARA registrations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbyists navigate complex legal and ethical terrain<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The U.S. Department of Defense released the 1260H list, a list of \"Chinese military companies\" that operate directly or indirectly in the United States, in late January. This move prompted efforts to increase the inspection of China's lobbying operations. After that, lawmakers said that they were thinking of passing a bill that would make it illegal for lobbyists representing businesses on the list to meet with members of Congress, not even to address issues on behalf of their American clients. A chart that listed several Chinese enterprises, including some military firms, along with the names of their lobbying firms and whether or not they were included on the 1260H list started to circulate on Capitol Hill after the 1260H list was released. According to Robert Sutter, a professor of international affairs practice at George Washington University's Elliott School, Chinese military organizations' lobbying operations have traditionally been vague, and enforcement has been lax.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rising concerns over reputation and risk<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

As of late February, at least five American lobbying companies had lost Chinese business. Steptoe LLP and BGI, a Shenzhen biotech company, have ended their business relationship. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld ended its partnership with Xiaomi, a Chinese electronics business not on the 1260H list, and filed cease-and-desist filings to halt advocating for Hesai Group, a Chinese manufacturer of LiDARs. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Additionally, the Vogel Group has ceased lobbying on behalf of Complete Genomics, a division of BGI, a genetic technology business, and DJI, a Chinese drone manufacturer. Hesai and DJI are both included in the 1260H list. While its former parent firm, BGI, is on the list, Complete Genomics is not. While it is challenging to enact legislation that forbids Congressmen from meeting with anybody, Republican Senator Marco Rubio told VOA that certain congressional offices have made the decision to forgo meetings with lobbying firms that represent Chinese defense businesses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Chinese business lobbying in Washington was virtually nonexistent until a few years ago, according to Craig Singleton, a senior researcher at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, but that all changed when the US government started pursuing Huawei. According to Singleton, there is room for improvement in the Department of Justice's involvement in limiting the CCP's negative lobbying effect on Capitol Hill. The Department of Justice is in charge of implementing and upholding FARA.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US lobbyists reevaluate ties: Shedding Chinese clients amid heightened oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-lobbyists-reevaluate-ties-shedding-chinese-clients-amid-heightened-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6913","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6902,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_content":"\n

After an Alabama judge deemed frozen embryos to be children, Democrats attempted in vain to ram legislation through the U.S. Senate that would have guaranteed Americans' access to IVF and other assisted reproductive technologies. At least three Alabama IVF clinics stopped doing IVF, which combines eggs and sperm in a lab dish for infertile couples, after the state Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos should be treated like children. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Challenges in the courtroom<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Because nonviable embryos are occasionally discarded or utilized for research, the Alabama court's decision has sparked worries that anyone participating in IVF may be prosecuted, and that it may also inspire other states to take similar legal action. Sen. Tammy Duckworth<\/a>, a Democrat and veteran of the Iraq War who was seriously injured in battle in 2004; she requested that the Senate take up her \"Access to Family Building Act\" legislation right now. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Alabama Supreme Court's decision last month that frozen embryos were lawfully regarded infants sparked fresh requests for federal safeguards for reproductive therapies, which led to the IVF business CooperSurgical filing. The decision, which caused some clinics in Alabama to stop IVF procedures, has set up a nationwide IVF firestorm. As the election draws near, Democrats are hammering Republicans on the matter, while the GOP is rushing to take positions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbying in Washington<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Thorn Run Partners, a Washington-based company licensed to effectively advocate on \"Fertility\" and \"Maternal Health,\" was engaged by CooperSurgical. This week, lawmakers in Alabama's Republican-controlled legislature passed a bill to safeguard IVF procedures. However, conservatives swiftly prevented the Senate from adopting the first federal policy. The Alabama Wrongful Death of a Minor Act made the destruction of embryos illegal, according to the court's ruling in that state's case. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Families alleging CooperSurgical caused the loss of their embryos are suing the corporation for undisclosed damages in many jurisdictions over identical allegations. CooperSurgical representative Adeena Fried responded, \"The company wanted to see that IVF remains accessible nationwide,\" when questioned about the choice to lobby. \"Our goal is to guarantee that the greatest goods and innovations can be utilized in Alabama and throughout the country to strengthen families and welcome new members into the world,\" the spokesperson stated. \"As of right now, a lot of clinics in Alabama are closed, and legislation nationwide needs to support the entire fertility industry.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The role of lobbying in reproductive technology<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In a similar vein, GenBioPro, a different reproductive health care firm, which manufactures mifepristone generically, approached Washington following a siege of their product. In 2022, a lobbying firm filed to represent the company, and the following year, GenBioPro filed a lawsuit against the FDA to maintain the drug's availability. CooperSurgical, a Connecticut-based corporation, recruited three seasoned Hill staffers, one of which was Jessie Brairton, a former Eli Lilly lobbyist and staff member of Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas). The other two lobbyists are Jacky Usyk, a veteran Democratic Senate assistant, and Andrew Rosenberg, a former aide to Sen. Ed Kennedy (D-Mass.), who co-founded the company. Federal filings state that CooperSurgical has not previously registered to lobby. Beasley met with Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra on Tuesday to talk about the turmoil and uncertainty caused by the Alabama Supreme Court decision that threatens IVF, as well as other individuals impacted by the decision. It caused many people's reproductive treatments to come to an abrupt halt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Balancing profit and patient welfare<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Every woman present at the discussion discussed the intense psychological stress and loneliness associated with receiving reproductive therapy. The epidemic had already caused some of them to have their reproductive treatments interrupted, only for the Supreme Court's ruling to throw them off course once again. According to fertility patient and nurse practitioner Kendall Diebold, \"the IVF world as a whole is so isolating and lonely.\" \"And all of that has really been taken by this, and it has just been magnified and filled with sadness, grief, and anger.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Internal medicine specialist Dr. Rachel Charles, who also has lupus, talked about the rigorous treatment plan she had to follow in order to do IVF and get ready for an embryo transfer. Rather than move on with an embryo transfer, she made the decision in February to take a break from the daily hormone injections. In a previous interview, Rebecca Mathews, 36, who is the mother of two IVF-conceived children, told The 19th that she was shocked and angry at the same time when she learned of the decision. She still has a frozen embryo and is unsure of what to do with it.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating legal turmoil: IVF company registers to lobby Washington","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-legal-turmoil-ivf-company-registers-to-lobby-washington","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6902","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6871,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_date_gmt":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_content":"\n

The Biden administration<\/a> remained dedicated to its alliances in the strategically significant Indo-Pacific area, one day after a US$95 billion <\/a>foreign assistance package omitted economic help pledged for the region as the US strives to counter China's influence there. We at the White House<\/a> and State Department are still in favor of funding authorization and appropriation. Deputy assistant secretary Camille Dawson of the US State Department stated, \"We feel it's critically important to continue working in close concert and in support of the freely associated states<\/a>,\" referring to the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau. Dawson said this in answer to a query from the Post at a press conference on the second anniversary of US President Joe Biden's Indo-Pacific Strategy announcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Navigating a Strategic Landscape<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The agreement is viewed as critical to Washington's efforts to sustain<\/a> its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken once declared that \"our planet's future will be written,\" despite growing concerns<\/a> about what some have called Beijing's coercive influence campaign.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That tactic may have its roots in the Compact of Free Association (Cofa), an agreement<\/a> that has guided US relations with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau for many years. First signed in 1986, the Cofa accord provides financial help and a legal framework<\/a> allowing its residents to live, work, and attend school in the United States in exchange for the US military having access to the land, air, and sea of the three Pacific island<\/a> nations. While Palau's Cofa program is scheduled to expire in September, that of the Marshall Islands and Micronesia expired on September 30. Last year, new agreements were established and extended, and Biden promised the three nations US$7.1 billion<\/a> spread over 20 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

In conclusion, The opinions of many Jewish Americans on AIPAC and its impact in US politics, particularly within the Democratic Party, have significantly changed as a result of this open letter. The discussion about US-Israel ties and AIPAC's influence on US foreign policy is expected to heat up as the 2024 elections draw near. <\/p>\n","post_title":"Jewish leaders oppose AIPAC's role in US elections","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"jewish-leaders-oppose-aipacs-role-in-us-elections","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6926","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6916,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-16 18:43:24","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-16 18:43:24","post_content":"\n

A measure that would force the popular video app TikTok to be banned nationally if its Chinese owner does not sell its shares was passed by the House. The MPs took action because they believed that the company's present ownership structure posed a threat to national security. After passing by a vote of 352-65<\/a>, the bill now moves on to the Senate, where its future is uncertain. With over 170 million users in the United States, TikTok is a fully-owned subsidiary of ByteDance Ltd., a Chinese technology company.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Legal and regulatory hurdles<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The congressmen claim that ByteDance is under the control of the Chinese government, which has the right to request access at any time to the data of TikTok users in the United States. The source of the concern is a series of national security legislation in China that require firms to cooperate with intelligence collection. The main conflict in Washington right now isn't between Joe Biden and Donald Trump. Politicians who wish to prohibit TikTok or compel its sale are at odds with those who wish to keep the well-known social media site unaltered. This problem in Washington, unlike most others, does not fall neatly into the Republican or Democratic camps. Trump chose to fight. During his presidency, he attempted to convince ByteDance Ltd., the company's Beijing-based owner of TikTok, to sell the business or risk a nationwide ban by using national security as a pretext. \"He perceived it as a means of penalizing China for the Covid-19 outbreak,\" states Stephen Myrow, the managing partner of Beacon Policy Advisors, a research organization that monitors the problem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Legal battles and court injunctions<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Bipartisan support for a ban in a key House committee vote last week set the process in motion. TikTok launched a ferocious lobbying effort, encouraging its video makers to contact their congressional representatives through push alerts. Most of it backfired. TikTok was accused by the Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party of \"lying to its users and using them to lobby Congress to benefit a foreign adversary.\" The committee was co-authored by Representatives Raja Krishnamoorthi, an Illinois Democrat, and Mike Gallagher, a Republican from Wisconsin. Nothing in Washington, including the TikTok ban, is ever as straightforward or obvious as it first appears. First, a group of legislators from both parties oppose it. Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, a libertarian Republican who opposes government intervention in business, particularly with Chinese-owned social media companies, finds it offensive. Many liberals, including the inventor herself, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, dislike it as well because they believe it would restrict the freedom of speech of youth and because they are wary of the China hawks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Global impact of a TikTok ban<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump had a meeting with Jeff Yass, the millionaire co-founder of Susquehanna International Group, a company that owns 15% of ByteDance and a significant Republican donor. Trump had changed his tune by Monday. During a phone interview with CNBC, he stated, \"A lot of people love TikTok.\" \"Many young children on TikTok will go insane without it.\" Ironically, the number of lawmakers seeking to put a ban on TikTok with conflicting agendas and large egos may be the largest hurdle to such a measure. While several senators have already begun to voice their disapproval of the House approach, no counterpart bill has been introduced in the Senate. It is anticipated that Senator Maria Cantwell, a Democrat from Washington, would eventually lead the charge on a TikTok law. Easter break is coming up soon. The legislative procedure is going to take longer. Politicians from both parties are also concerned about upsetting young people by interfering with their preferred app, especially with elections coming up.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Public opinion and political dynamics<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

While there is pressure for a TikTok ban, a forced divestment may be more plausible. Or the altercation can go like a well-known Washington narrative: a major altercation, loud headlines, and then nothing. TikTok is like dry tinder waiting to catch fire every time it comes up. However, it always fizzles out, and it will most likely do so once more in this instance. The issue is that it's hard to get an agreement on a single issue when everyone has a plan. There is a more localized worry, even if politicians will undoubtedly consider the business and international policy ramifications of outlawing TikTok. It's become commonplace to call an election after the hottest platform of the day since politicians use social media every election cycle to try to win over young people.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion,  One may make a compelling argument for the TikTok Election 2024. Every month, almost 170 million Americans use the app. About one-third of US individuals under 30 and roughly 43% of TikTok users say they routinely obtain their news from the platform, which is twice as many as three years ago, according to the Pew Research Center.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Slow roll: The uncertain fate of a TikTok ban","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"slow-roll-the-uncertain-fate-of-a-tiktok-ban","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6916","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6913,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-13 18:13:25","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-13 18:13:25","post_content":"\n

Legislators seeking to increase scrutiny are prompting lobbying companies in Washington to quickly withdraw their clients from China. The drive follows rising worries about China's influence and a recent spike in Chinese lobbying. The goal of legislators is to stop the People's Liberation Army (PLA) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)<\/a> from surreptitiously advancing agendas that undermine the interests of the American people by using legal loopholes. Senator John Cornyn, a Republican, told VOA's Mandarin Service that senators are almost done working on legislation that attempts to solve the issue. Members of the House have filed a bill to expose the exposing Foreign Influence in Lobbying Act, which was approved by the Senate last year. Cornyn co-sponsored the Senate legislation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The evolving landscape of US-China relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

\"Although there has been some opposition, we will keep working because it's critical to know who is genuinely influencing these legislators,\" Cornyn stated. Ensuring that individuals register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act has been the main priority. As you are aware, there have been several issues raised by persons failing to declare their lobbying agreements with foreign governments. Legislators are attempting to enact legislation that would close loopholes in the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 (LDA) and the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938 (FARA) in order to require greater transparency regarding foreign governments and political parties that engage in the organization, management, control, or supervision of lobbying efforts, whether or not they have received financial contributions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Scrutiny intensifies on lobbying practices<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

According to Cornyn, China presents a special difficulty. He remarked, \"The Chinese are unique in that they are forced to share information with the PLA and with their intelligence agencies; they do not have a true solely private sector.\" Thus, I would suggest that there should always be care when working with Chinese-owned businesses. The LDA, which mandates disclosure of domestic lobbying, and the FARA, which mandates disclosure of lobbying and other kinds of influence by foreign governments and political parties, control lobbying in the United States. But in 1995, FARA was changed to exclude people or firms representing foreigners if their activity isn't meant to help a foreign government or political party. Lobbyists consequently registered under the far less transparent LDA, which led to a sharp decline in FARA registrations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbyists navigate complex legal and ethical terrain<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The U.S. Department of Defense released the 1260H list, a list of \"Chinese military companies\" that operate directly or indirectly in the United States, in late January. This move prompted efforts to increase the inspection of China's lobbying operations. After that, lawmakers said that they were thinking of passing a bill that would make it illegal for lobbyists representing businesses on the list to meet with members of Congress, not even to address issues on behalf of their American clients. A chart that listed several Chinese enterprises, including some military firms, along with the names of their lobbying firms and whether or not they were included on the 1260H list started to circulate on Capitol Hill after the 1260H list was released. According to Robert Sutter, a professor of international affairs practice at George Washington University's Elliott School, Chinese military organizations' lobbying operations have traditionally been vague, and enforcement has been lax.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rising concerns over reputation and risk<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

As of late February, at least five American lobbying companies had lost Chinese business. Steptoe LLP and BGI, a Shenzhen biotech company, have ended their business relationship. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld ended its partnership with Xiaomi, a Chinese electronics business not on the 1260H list, and filed cease-and-desist filings to halt advocating for Hesai Group, a Chinese manufacturer of LiDARs. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Additionally, the Vogel Group has ceased lobbying on behalf of Complete Genomics, a division of BGI, a genetic technology business, and DJI, a Chinese drone manufacturer. Hesai and DJI are both included in the 1260H list. While its former parent firm, BGI, is on the list, Complete Genomics is not. While it is challenging to enact legislation that forbids Congressmen from meeting with anybody, Republican Senator Marco Rubio told VOA that certain congressional offices have made the decision to forgo meetings with lobbying firms that represent Chinese defense businesses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Chinese business lobbying in Washington was virtually nonexistent until a few years ago, according to Craig Singleton, a senior researcher at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, but that all changed when the US government started pursuing Huawei. According to Singleton, there is room for improvement in the Department of Justice's involvement in limiting the CCP's negative lobbying effect on Capitol Hill. The Department of Justice is in charge of implementing and upholding FARA.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US lobbyists reevaluate ties: Shedding Chinese clients amid heightened oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-lobbyists-reevaluate-ties-shedding-chinese-clients-amid-heightened-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6913","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6902,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_content":"\n

After an Alabama judge deemed frozen embryos to be children, Democrats attempted in vain to ram legislation through the U.S. Senate that would have guaranteed Americans' access to IVF and other assisted reproductive technologies. At least three Alabama IVF clinics stopped doing IVF, which combines eggs and sperm in a lab dish for infertile couples, after the state Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos should be treated like children. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Challenges in the courtroom<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Because nonviable embryos are occasionally discarded or utilized for research, the Alabama court's decision has sparked worries that anyone participating in IVF may be prosecuted, and that it may also inspire other states to take similar legal action. Sen. Tammy Duckworth<\/a>, a Democrat and veteran of the Iraq War who was seriously injured in battle in 2004; she requested that the Senate take up her \"Access to Family Building Act\" legislation right now. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Alabama Supreme Court's decision last month that frozen embryos were lawfully regarded infants sparked fresh requests for federal safeguards for reproductive therapies, which led to the IVF business CooperSurgical filing. The decision, which caused some clinics in Alabama to stop IVF procedures, has set up a nationwide IVF firestorm. As the election draws near, Democrats are hammering Republicans on the matter, while the GOP is rushing to take positions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbying in Washington<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Thorn Run Partners, a Washington-based company licensed to effectively advocate on \"Fertility\" and \"Maternal Health,\" was engaged by CooperSurgical. This week, lawmakers in Alabama's Republican-controlled legislature passed a bill to safeguard IVF procedures. However, conservatives swiftly prevented the Senate from adopting the first federal policy. The Alabama Wrongful Death of a Minor Act made the destruction of embryos illegal, according to the court's ruling in that state's case. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Families alleging CooperSurgical caused the loss of their embryos are suing the corporation for undisclosed damages in many jurisdictions over identical allegations. CooperSurgical representative Adeena Fried responded, \"The company wanted to see that IVF remains accessible nationwide,\" when questioned about the choice to lobby. \"Our goal is to guarantee that the greatest goods and innovations can be utilized in Alabama and throughout the country to strengthen families and welcome new members into the world,\" the spokesperson stated. \"As of right now, a lot of clinics in Alabama are closed, and legislation nationwide needs to support the entire fertility industry.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The role of lobbying in reproductive technology<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In a similar vein, GenBioPro, a different reproductive health care firm, which manufactures mifepristone generically, approached Washington following a siege of their product. In 2022, a lobbying firm filed to represent the company, and the following year, GenBioPro filed a lawsuit against the FDA to maintain the drug's availability. CooperSurgical, a Connecticut-based corporation, recruited three seasoned Hill staffers, one of which was Jessie Brairton, a former Eli Lilly lobbyist and staff member of Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas). The other two lobbyists are Jacky Usyk, a veteran Democratic Senate assistant, and Andrew Rosenberg, a former aide to Sen. Ed Kennedy (D-Mass.), who co-founded the company. Federal filings state that CooperSurgical has not previously registered to lobby. Beasley met with Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra on Tuesday to talk about the turmoil and uncertainty caused by the Alabama Supreme Court decision that threatens IVF, as well as other individuals impacted by the decision. It caused many people's reproductive treatments to come to an abrupt halt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Balancing profit and patient welfare<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Every woman present at the discussion discussed the intense psychological stress and loneliness associated with receiving reproductive therapy. The epidemic had already caused some of them to have their reproductive treatments interrupted, only for the Supreme Court's ruling to throw them off course once again. According to fertility patient and nurse practitioner Kendall Diebold, \"the IVF world as a whole is so isolating and lonely.\" \"And all of that has really been taken by this, and it has just been magnified and filled with sadness, grief, and anger.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Internal medicine specialist Dr. Rachel Charles, who also has lupus, talked about the rigorous treatment plan she had to follow in order to do IVF and get ready for an embryo transfer. Rather than move on with an embryo transfer, she made the decision in February to take a break from the daily hormone injections. In a previous interview, Rebecca Mathews, 36, who is the mother of two IVF-conceived children, told The 19th that she was shocked and angry at the same time when she learned of the decision. She still has a frozen embryo and is unsure of what to do with it.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating legal turmoil: IVF company registers to lobby Washington","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-legal-turmoil-ivf-company-registers-to-lobby-washington","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6902","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6871,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_date_gmt":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_content":"\n

The Biden administration<\/a> remained dedicated to its alliances in the strategically significant Indo-Pacific area, one day after a US$95 billion <\/a>foreign assistance package omitted economic help pledged for the region as the US strives to counter China's influence there. We at the White House<\/a> and State Department are still in favor of funding authorization and appropriation. Deputy assistant secretary Camille Dawson of the US State Department stated, \"We feel it's critically important to continue working in close concert and in support of the freely associated states<\/a>,\" referring to the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau. Dawson said this in answer to a query from the Post at a press conference on the second anniversary of US President Joe Biden's Indo-Pacific Strategy announcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Navigating a Strategic Landscape<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The agreement is viewed as critical to Washington's efforts to sustain<\/a> its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken once declared that \"our planet's future will be written,\" despite growing concerns<\/a> about what some have called Beijing's coercive influence campaign.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That tactic may have its roots in the Compact of Free Association (Cofa), an agreement<\/a> that has guided US relations with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau for many years. First signed in 1986, the Cofa accord provides financial help and a legal framework<\/a> allowing its residents to live, work, and attend school in the United States in exchange for the US military having access to the land, air, and sea of the three Pacific island<\/a> nations. While Palau's Cofa program is scheduled to expire in September, that of the Marshall Islands and Micronesia expired on September 30. Last year, new agreements were established and extended, and Biden promised the three nations US$7.1 billion<\/a> spread over 20 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, The opinions of many Jewish Americans on AIPAC and its impact in US politics, particularly within the Democratic Party, have significantly changed as a result of this open letter. The discussion about US-Israel ties and AIPAC's influence on US foreign policy is expected to heat up as the 2024 elections draw near. <\/p>\n","post_title":"Jewish leaders oppose AIPAC's role in US elections","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"jewish-leaders-oppose-aipacs-role-in-us-elections","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6926","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6916,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-16 18:43:24","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-16 18:43:24","post_content":"\n

A measure that would force the popular video app TikTok to be banned nationally if its Chinese owner does not sell its shares was passed by the House. The MPs took action because they believed that the company's present ownership structure posed a threat to national security. After passing by a vote of 352-65<\/a>, the bill now moves on to the Senate, where its future is uncertain. With over 170 million users in the United States, TikTok is a fully-owned subsidiary of ByteDance Ltd., a Chinese technology company.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Legal and regulatory hurdles<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The congressmen claim that ByteDance is under the control of the Chinese government, which has the right to request access at any time to the data of TikTok users in the United States. The source of the concern is a series of national security legislation in China that require firms to cooperate with intelligence collection. The main conflict in Washington right now isn't between Joe Biden and Donald Trump. Politicians who wish to prohibit TikTok or compel its sale are at odds with those who wish to keep the well-known social media site unaltered. This problem in Washington, unlike most others, does not fall neatly into the Republican or Democratic camps. Trump chose to fight. During his presidency, he attempted to convince ByteDance Ltd., the company's Beijing-based owner of TikTok, to sell the business or risk a nationwide ban by using national security as a pretext. \"He perceived it as a means of penalizing China for the Covid-19 outbreak,\" states Stephen Myrow, the managing partner of Beacon Policy Advisors, a research organization that monitors the problem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Legal battles and court injunctions<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Bipartisan support for a ban in a key House committee vote last week set the process in motion. TikTok launched a ferocious lobbying effort, encouraging its video makers to contact their congressional representatives through push alerts. Most of it backfired. TikTok was accused by the Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party of \"lying to its users and using them to lobby Congress to benefit a foreign adversary.\" The committee was co-authored by Representatives Raja Krishnamoorthi, an Illinois Democrat, and Mike Gallagher, a Republican from Wisconsin. Nothing in Washington, including the TikTok ban, is ever as straightforward or obvious as it first appears. First, a group of legislators from both parties oppose it. Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, a libertarian Republican who opposes government intervention in business, particularly with Chinese-owned social media companies, finds it offensive. Many liberals, including the inventor herself, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, dislike it as well because they believe it would restrict the freedom of speech of youth and because they are wary of the China hawks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Global impact of a TikTok ban<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump had a meeting with Jeff Yass, the millionaire co-founder of Susquehanna International Group, a company that owns 15% of ByteDance and a significant Republican donor. Trump had changed his tune by Monday. During a phone interview with CNBC, he stated, \"A lot of people love TikTok.\" \"Many young children on TikTok will go insane without it.\" Ironically, the number of lawmakers seeking to put a ban on TikTok with conflicting agendas and large egos may be the largest hurdle to such a measure. While several senators have already begun to voice their disapproval of the House approach, no counterpart bill has been introduced in the Senate. It is anticipated that Senator Maria Cantwell, a Democrat from Washington, would eventually lead the charge on a TikTok law. Easter break is coming up soon. The legislative procedure is going to take longer. Politicians from both parties are also concerned about upsetting young people by interfering with their preferred app, especially with elections coming up.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Public opinion and political dynamics<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

While there is pressure for a TikTok ban, a forced divestment may be more plausible. Or the altercation can go like a well-known Washington narrative: a major altercation, loud headlines, and then nothing. TikTok is like dry tinder waiting to catch fire every time it comes up. However, it always fizzles out, and it will most likely do so once more in this instance. The issue is that it's hard to get an agreement on a single issue when everyone has a plan. There is a more localized worry, even if politicians will undoubtedly consider the business and international policy ramifications of outlawing TikTok. It's become commonplace to call an election after the hottest platform of the day since politicians use social media every election cycle to try to win over young people.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion,  One may make a compelling argument for the TikTok Election 2024. Every month, almost 170 million Americans use the app. About one-third of US individuals under 30 and roughly 43% of TikTok users say they routinely obtain their news from the platform, which is twice as many as three years ago, according to the Pew Research Center.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Slow roll: The uncertain fate of a TikTok ban","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"slow-roll-the-uncertain-fate-of-a-tiktok-ban","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6916","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6913,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-13 18:13:25","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-13 18:13:25","post_content":"\n

Legislators seeking to increase scrutiny are prompting lobbying companies in Washington to quickly withdraw their clients from China. The drive follows rising worries about China's influence and a recent spike in Chinese lobbying. The goal of legislators is to stop the People's Liberation Army (PLA) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)<\/a> from surreptitiously advancing agendas that undermine the interests of the American people by using legal loopholes. Senator John Cornyn, a Republican, told VOA's Mandarin Service that senators are almost done working on legislation that attempts to solve the issue. Members of the House have filed a bill to expose the exposing Foreign Influence in Lobbying Act, which was approved by the Senate last year. Cornyn co-sponsored the Senate legislation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The evolving landscape of US-China relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

\"Although there has been some opposition, we will keep working because it's critical to know who is genuinely influencing these legislators,\" Cornyn stated. Ensuring that individuals register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act has been the main priority. As you are aware, there have been several issues raised by persons failing to declare their lobbying agreements with foreign governments. Legislators are attempting to enact legislation that would close loopholes in the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 (LDA) and the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938 (FARA) in order to require greater transparency regarding foreign governments and political parties that engage in the organization, management, control, or supervision of lobbying efforts, whether or not they have received financial contributions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Scrutiny intensifies on lobbying practices<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

According to Cornyn, China presents a special difficulty. He remarked, \"The Chinese are unique in that they are forced to share information with the PLA and with their intelligence agencies; they do not have a true solely private sector.\" Thus, I would suggest that there should always be care when working with Chinese-owned businesses. The LDA, which mandates disclosure of domestic lobbying, and the FARA, which mandates disclosure of lobbying and other kinds of influence by foreign governments and political parties, control lobbying in the United States. But in 1995, FARA was changed to exclude people or firms representing foreigners if their activity isn't meant to help a foreign government or political party. Lobbyists consequently registered under the far less transparent LDA, which led to a sharp decline in FARA registrations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbyists navigate complex legal and ethical terrain<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The U.S. Department of Defense released the 1260H list, a list of \"Chinese military companies\" that operate directly or indirectly in the United States, in late January. This move prompted efforts to increase the inspection of China's lobbying operations. After that, lawmakers said that they were thinking of passing a bill that would make it illegal for lobbyists representing businesses on the list to meet with members of Congress, not even to address issues on behalf of their American clients. A chart that listed several Chinese enterprises, including some military firms, along with the names of their lobbying firms and whether or not they were included on the 1260H list started to circulate on Capitol Hill after the 1260H list was released. According to Robert Sutter, a professor of international affairs practice at George Washington University's Elliott School, Chinese military organizations' lobbying operations have traditionally been vague, and enforcement has been lax.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rising concerns over reputation and risk<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

As of late February, at least five American lobbying companies had lost Chinese business. Steptoe LLP and BGI, a Shenzhen biotech company, have ended their business relationship. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld ended its partnership with Xiaomi, a Chinese electronics business not on the 1260H list, and filed cease-and-desist filings to halt advocating for Hesai Group, a Chinese manufacturer of LiDARs. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Additionally, the Vogel Group has ceased lobbying on behalf of Complete Genomics, a division of BGI, a genetic technology business, and DJI, a Chinese drone manufacturer. Hesai and DJI are both included in the 1260H list. While its former parent firm, BGI, is on the list, Complete Genomics is not. While it is challenging to enact legislation that forbids Congressmen from meeting with anybody, Republican Senator Marco Rubio told VOA that certain congressional offices have made the decision to forgo meetings with lobbying firms that represent Chinese defense businesses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Chinese business lobbying in Washington was virtually nonexistent until a few years ago, according to Craig Singleton, a senior researcher at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, but that all changed when the US government started pursuing Huawei. According to Singleton, there is room for improvement in the Department of Justice's involvement in limiting the CCP's negative lobbying effect on Capitol Hill. The Department of Justice is in charge of implementing and upholding FARA.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US lobbyists reevaluate ties: Shedding Chinese clients amid heightened oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-lobbyists-reevaluate-ties-shedding-chinese-clients-amid-heightened-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6913","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6902,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_content":"\n

After an Alabama judge deemed frozen embryos to be children, Democrats attempted in vain to ram legislation through the U.S. Senate that would have guaranteed Americans' access to IVF and other assisted reproductive technologies. At least three Alabama IVF clinics stopped doing IVF, which combines eggs and sperm in a lab dish for infertile couples, after the state Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos should be treated like children. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Challenges in the courtroom<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Because nonviable embryos are occasionally discarded or utilized for research, the Alabama court's decision has sparked worries that anyone participating in IVF may be prosecuted, and that it may also inspire other states to take similar legal action. Sen. Tammy Duckworth<\/a>, a Democrat and veteran of the Iraq War who was seriously injured in battle in 2004; she requested that the Senate take up her \"Access to Family Building Act\" legislation right now. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Alabama Supreme Court's decision last month that frozen embryos were lawfully regarded infants sparked fresh requests for federal safeguards for reproductive therapies, which led to the IVF business CooperSurgical filing. The decision, which caused some clinics in Alabama to stop IVF procedures, has set up a nationwide IVF firestorm. As the election draws near, Democrats are hammering Republicans on the matter, while the GOP is rushing to take positions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbying in Washington<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Thorn Run Partners, a Washington-based company licensed to effectively advocate on \"Fertility\" and \"Maternal Health,\" was engaged by CooperSurgical. This week, lawmakers in Alabama's Republican-controlled legislature passed a bill to safeguard IVF procedures. However, conservatives swiftly prevented the Senate from adopting the first federal policy. The Alabama Wrongful Death of a Minor Act made the destruction of embryos illegal, according to the court's ruling in that state's case. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Families alleging CooperSurgical caused the loss of their embryos are suing the corporation for undisclosed damages in many jurisdictions over identical allegations. CooperSurgical representative Adeena Fried responded, \"The company wanted to see that IVF remains accessible nationwide,\" when questioned about the choice to lobby. \"Our goal is to guarantee that the greatest goods and innovations can be utilized in Alabama and throughout the country to strengthen families and welcome new members into the world,\" the spokesperson stated. \"As of right now, a lot of clinics in Alabama are closed, and legislation nationwide needs to support the entire fertility industry.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The role of lobbying in reproductive technology<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In a similar vein, GenBioPro, a different reproductive health care firm, which manufactures mifepristone generically, approached Washington following a siege of their product. In 2022, a lobbying firm filed to represent the company, and the following year, GenBioPro filed a lawsuit against the FDA to maintain the drug's availability. CooperSurgical, a Connecticut-based corporation, recruited three seasoned Hill staffers, one of which was Jessie Brairton, a former Eli Lilly lobbyist and staff member of Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas). The other two lobbyists are Jacky Usyk, a veteran Democratic Senate assistant, and Andrew Rosenberg, a former aide to Sen. Ed Kennedy (D-Mass.), who co-founded the company. Federal filings state that CooperSurgical has not previously registered to lobby. Beasley met with Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra on Tuesday to talk about the turmoil and uncertainty caused by the Alabama Supreme Court decision that threatens IVF, as well as other individuals impacted by the decision. It caused many people's reproductive treatments to come to an abrupt halt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Balancing profit and patient welfare<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Every woman present at the discussion discussed the intense psychological stress and loneliness associated with receiving reproductive therapy. The epidemic had already caused some of them to have their reproductive treatments interrupted, only for the Supreme Court's ruling to throw them off course once again. According to fertility patient and nurse practitioner Kendall Diebold, \"the IVF world as a whole is so isolating and lonely.\" \"And all of that has really been taken by this, and it has just been magnified and filled with sadness, grief, and anger.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Internal medicine specialist Dr. Rachel Charles, who also has lupus, talked about the rigorous treatment plan she had to follow in order to do IVF and get ready for an embryo transfer. Rather than move on with an embryo transfer, she made the decision in February to take a break from the daily hormone injections. In a previous interview, Rebecca Mathews, 36, who is the mother of two IVF-conceived children, told The 19th that she was shocked and angry at the same time when she learned of the decision. She still has a frozen embryo and is unsure of what to do with it.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating legal turmoil: IVF company registers to lobby Washington","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-legal-turmoil-ivf-company-registers-to-lobby-washington","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6902","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6871,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_date_gmt":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_content":"\n

The Biden administration<\/a> remained dedicated to its alliances in the strategically significant Indo-Pacific area, one day after a US$95 billion <\/a>foreign assistance package omitted economic help pledged for the region as the US strives to counter China's influence there. We at the White House<\/a> and State Department are still in favor of funding authorization and appropriation. Deputy assistant secretary Camille Dawson of the US State Department stated, \"We feel it's critically important to continue working in close concert and in support of the freely associated states<\/a>,\" referring to the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau. Dawson said this in answer to a query from the Post at a press conference on the second anniversary of US President Joe Biden's Indo-Pacific Strategy announcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Navigating a Strategic Landscape<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The agreement is viewed as critical to Washington's efforts to sustain<\/a> its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken once declared that \"our planet's future will be written,\" despite growing concerns<\/a> about what some have called Beijing's coercive influence campaign.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That tactic may have its roots in the Compact of Free Association (Cofa), an agreement<\/a> that has guided US relations with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau for many years. First signed in 1986, the Cofa accord provides financial help and a legal framework<\/a> allowing its residents to live, work, and attend school in the United States in exchange for the US military having access to the land, air, and sea of the three Pacific island<\/a> nations. While Palau's Cofa program is scheduled to expire in September, that of the Marshall Islands and Micronesia expired on September 30. Last year, new agreements were established and extended, and Biden promised the three nations US$7.1 billion<\/a> spread over 20 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

The majority of Jewish Americans want more impartial policies, especially democratic ones, both domestically and regionally, according to Sharon Goldtvik, a political and communications consultant for progressive organizations. Eighty-nine percent of Jewish Americans believe that Israel has good justification to go to war with Hamas, and sixty-two percent think that Israel is conducting the conflict in Gaza in an appropriate manner. The letter was also signed by representatives of J Street, a Jewish-American organization that is \"pro-Israel, pro-peace\" and has frequently disagreed with Aipac. The signatories draw attention to the fact that AIPAC recently endorsed radical Republicans and that some members of Congress voted against recognizing President Joe Biden's win over Donald Trump in the 2021\u20132022 election cycle. It is also pointed out that the network of AIPAC received millions of dollars in donations from Trump supporters and used that money to support progressive candidates in Democratic primaries, mostly those who belong to racial and ethnic minorities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, The opinions of many Jewish Americans on AIPAC and its impact in US politics, particularly within the Democratic Party, have significantly changed as a result of this open letter. The discussion about US-Israel ties and AIPAC's influence on US foreign policy is expected to heat up as the 2024 elections draw near. <\/p>\n","post_title":"Jewish leaders oppose AIPAC's role in US elections","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"jewish-leaders-oppose-aipacs-role-in-us-elections","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6926","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6916,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-16 18:43:24","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-16 18:43:24","post_content":"\n

A measure that would force the popular video app TikTok to be banned nationally if its Chinese owner does not sell its shares was passed by the House. The MPs took action because they believed that the company's present ownership structure posed a threat to national security. After passing by a vote of 352-65<\/a>, the bill now moves on to the Senate, where its future is uncertain. With over 170 million users in the United States, TikTok is a fully-owned subsidiary of ByteDance Ltd., a Chinese technology company.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Legal and regulatory hurdles<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The congressmen claim that ByteDance is under the control of the Chinese government, which has the right to request access at any time to the data of TikTok users in the United States. The source of the concern is a series of national security legislation in China that require firms to cooperate with intelligence collection. The main conflict in Washington right now isn't between Joe Biden and Donald Trump. Politicians who wish to prohibit TikTok or compel its sale are at odds with those who wish to keep the well-known social media site unaltered. This problem in Washington, unlike most others, does not fall neatly into the Republican or Democratic camps. Trump chose to fight. During his presidency, he attempted to convince ByteDance Ltd., the company's Beijing-based owner of TikTok, to sell the business or risk a nationwide ban by using national security as a pretext. \"He perceived it as a means of penalizing China for the Covid-19 outbreak,\" states Stephen Myrow, the managing partner of Beacon Policy Advisors, a research organization that monitors the problem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Legal battles and court injunctions<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Bipartisan support for a ban in a key House committee vote last week set the process in motion. TikTok launched a ferocious lobbying effort, encouraging its video makers to contact their congressional representatives through push alerts. Most of it backfired. TikTok was accused by the Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party of \"lying to its users and using them to lobby Congress to benefit a foreign adversary.\" The committee was co-authored by Representatives Raja Krishnamoorthi, an Illinois Democrat, and Mike Gallagher, a Republican from Wisconsin. Nothing in Washington, including the TikTok ban, is ever as straightforward or obvious as it first appears. First, a group of legislators from both parties oppose it. Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, a libertarian Republican who opposes government intervention in business, particularly with Chinese-owned social media companies, finds it offensive. Many liberals, including the inventor herself, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, dislike it as well because they believe it would restrict the freedom of speech of youth and because they are wary of the China hawks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Global impact of a TikTok ban<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump had a meeting with Jeff Yass, the millionaire co-founder of Susquehanna International Group, a company that owns 15% of ByteDance and a significant Republican donor. Trump had changed his tune by Monday. During a phone interview with CNBC, he stated, \"A lot of people love TikTok.\" \"Many young children on TikTok will go insane without it.\" Ironically, the number of lawmakers seeking to put a ban on TikTok with conflicting agendas and large egos may be the largest hurdle to such a measure. While several senators have already begun to voice their disapproval of the House approach, no counterpart bill has been introduced in the Senate. It is anticipated that Senator Maria Cantwell, a Democrat from Washington, would eventually lead the charge on a TikTok law. Easter break is coming up soon. The legislative procedure is going to take longer. Politicians from both parties are also concerned about upsetting young people by interfering with their preferred app, especially with elections coming up.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Public opinion and political dynamics<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

While there is pressure for a TikTok ban, a forced divestment may be more plausible. Or the altercation can go like a well-known Washington narrative: a major altercation, loud headlines, and then nothing. TikTok is like dry tinder waiting to catch fire every time it comes up. However, it always fizzles out, and it will most likely do so once more in this instance. The issue is that it's hard to get an agreement on a single issue when everyone has a plan. There is a more localized worry, even if politicians will undoubtedly consider the business and international policy ramifications of outlawing TikTok. It's become commonplace to call an election after the hottest platform of the day since politicians use social media every election cycle to try to win over young people.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion,  One may make a compelling argument for the TikTok Election 2024. Every month, almost 170 million Americans use the app. About one-third of US individuals under 30 and roughly 43% of TikTok users say they routinely obtain their news from the platform, which is twice as many as three years ago, according to the Pew Research Center.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Slow roll: The uncertain fate of a TikTok ban","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"slow-roll-the-uncertain-fate-of-a-tiktok-ban","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6916","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6913,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-13 18:13:25","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-13 18:13:25","post_content":"\n

Legislators seeking to increase scrutiny are prompting lobbying companies in Washington to quickly withdraw their clients from China. The drive follows rising worries about China's influence and a recent spike in Chinese lobbying. The goal of legislators is to stop the People's Liberation Army (PLA) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)<\/a> from surreptitiously advancing agendas that undermine the interests of the American people by using legal loopholes. Senator John Cornyn, a Republican, told VOA's Mandarin Service that senators are almost done working on legislation that attempts to solve the issue. Members of the House have filed a bill to expose the exposing Foreign Influence in Lobbying Act, which was approved by the Senate last year. Cornyn co-sponsored the Senate legislation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The evolving landscape of US-China relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

\"Although there has been some opposition, we will keep working because it's critical to know who is genuinely influencing these legislators,\" Cornyn stated. Ensuring that individuals register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act has been the main priority. As you are aware, there have been several issues raised by persons failing to declare their lobbying agreements with foreign governments. Legislators are attempting to enact legislation that would close loopholes in the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 (LDA) and the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938 (FARA) in order to require greater transparency regarding foreign governments and political parties that engage in the organization, management, control, or supervision of lobbying efforts, whether or not they have received financial contributions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Scrutiny intensifies on lobbying practices<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

According to Cornyn, China presents a special difficulty. He remarked, \"The Chinese are unique in that they are forced to share information with the PLA and with their intelligence agencies; they do not have a true solely private sector.\" Thus, I would suggest that there should always be care when working with Chinese-owned businesses. The LDA, which mandates disclosure of domestic lobbying, and the FARA, which mandates disclosure of lobbying and other kinds of influence by foreign governments and political parties, control lobbying in the United States. But in 1995, FARA was changed to exclude people or firms representing foreigners if their activity isn't meant to help a foreign government or political party. Lobbyists consequently registered under the far less transparent LDA, which led to a sharp decline in FARA registrations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbyists navigate complex legal and ethical terrain<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The U.S. Department of Defense released the 1260H list, a list of \"Chinese military companies\" that operate directly or indirectly in the United States, in late January. This move prompted efforts to increase the inspection of China's lobbying operations. After that, lawmakers said that they were thinking of passing a bill that would make it illegal for lobbyists representing businesses on the list to meet with members of Congress, not even to address issues on behalf of their American clients. A chart that listed several Chinese enterprises, including some military firms, along with the names of their lobbying firms and whether or not they were included on the 1260H list started to circulate on Capitol Hill after the 1260H list was released. According to Robert Sutter, a professor of international affairs practice at George Washington University's Elliott School, Chinese military organizations' lobbying operations have traditionally been vague, and enforcement has been lax.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rising concerns over reputation and risk<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

As of late February, at least five American lobbying companies had lost Chinese business. Steptoe LLP and BGI, a Shenzhen biotech company, have ended their business relationship. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld ended its partnership with Xiaomi, a Chinese electronics business not on the 1260H list, and filed cease-and-desist filings to halt advocating for Hesai Group, a Chinese manufacturer of LiDARs. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Additionally, the Vogel Group has ceased lobbying on behalf of Complete Genomics, a division of BGI, a genetic technology business, and DJI, a Chinese drone manufacturer. Hesai and DJI are both included in the 1260H list. While its former parent firm, BGI, is on the list, Complete Genomics is not. While it is challenging to enact legislation that forbids Congressmen from meeting with anybody, Republican Senator Marco Rubio told VOA that certain congressional offices have made the decision to forgo meetings with lobbying firms that represent Chinese defense businesses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Chinese business lobbying in Washington was virtually nonexistent until a few years ago, according to Craig Singleton, a senior researcher at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, but that all changed when the US government started pursuing Huawei. According to Singleton, there is room for improvement in the Department of Justice's involvement in limiting the CCP's negative lobbying effect on Capitol Hill. The Department of Justice is in charge of implementing and upholding FARA.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US lobbyists reevaluate ties: Shedding Chinese clients amid heightened oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-lobbyists-reevaluate-ties-shedding-chinese-clients-amid-heightened-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6913","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6902,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_content":"\n

After an Alabama judge deemed frozen embryos to be children, Democrats attempted in vain to ram legislation through the U.S. Senate that would have guaranteed Americans' access to IVF and other assisted reproductive technologies. At least three Alabama IVF clinics stopped doing IVF, which combines eggs and sperm in a lab dish for infertile couples, after the state Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos should be treated like children. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Challenges in the courtroom<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Because nonviable embryos are occasionally discarded or utilized for research, the Alabama court's decision has sparked worries that anyone participating in IVF may be prosecuted, and that it may also inspire other states to take similar legal action. Sen. Tammy Duckworth<\/a>, a Democrat and veteran of the Iraq War who was seriously injured in battle in 2004; she requested that the Senate take up her \"Access to Family Building Act\" legislation right now. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Alabama Supreme Court's decision last month that frozen embryos were lawfully regarded infants sparked fresh requests for federal safeguards for reproductive therapies, which led to the IVF business CooperSurgical filing. The decision, which caused some clinics in Alabama to stop IVF procedures, has set up a nationwide IVF firestorm. As the election draws near, Democrats are hammering Republicans on the matter, while the GOP is rushing to take positions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbying in Washington<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Thorn Run Partners, a Washington-based company licensed to effectively advocate on \"Fertility\" and \"Maternal Health,\" was engaged by CooperSurgical. This week, lawmakers in Alabama's Republican-controlled legislature passed a bill to safeguard IVF procedures. However, conservatives swiftly prevented the Senate from adopting the first federal policy. The Alabama Wrongful Death of a Minor Act made the destruction of embryos illegal, according to the court's ruling in that state's case. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Families alleging CooperSurgical caused the loss of their embryos are suing the corporation for undisclosed damages in many jurisdictions over identical allegations. CooperSurgical representative Adeena Fried responded, \"The company wanted to see that IVF remains accessible nationwide,\" when questioned about the choice to lobby. \"Our goal is to guarantee that the greatest goods and innovations can be utilized in Alabama and throughout the country to strengthen families and welcome new members into the world,\" the spokesperson stated. \"As of right now, a lot of clinics in Alabama are closed, and legislation nationwide needs to support the entire fertility industry.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The role of lobbying in reproductive technology<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In a similar vein, GenBioPro, a different reproductive health care firm, which manufactures mifepristone generically, approached Washington following a siege of their product. In 2022, a lobbying firm filed to represent the company, and the following year, GenBioPro filed a lawsuit against the FDA to maintain the drug's availability. CooperSurgical, a Connecticut-based corporation, recruited three seasoned Hill staffers, one of which was Jessie Brairton, a former Eli Lilly lobbyist and staff member of Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas). The other two lobbyists are Jacky Usyk, a veteran Democratic Senate assistant, and Andrew Rosenberg, a former aide to Sen. Ed Kennedy (D-Mass.), who co-founded the company. Federal filings state that CooperSurgical has not previously registered to lobby. Beasley met with Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra on Tuesday to talk about the turmoil and uncertainty caused by the Alabama Supreme Court decision that threatens IVF, as well as other individuals impacted by the decision. It caused many people's reproductive treatments to come to an abrupt halt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Balancing profit and patient welfare<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Every woman present at the discussion discussed the intense psychological stress and loneliness associated with receiving reproductive therapy. The epidemic had already caused some of them to have their reproductive treatments interrupted, only for the Supreme Court's ruling to throw them off course once again. According to fertility patient and nurse practitioner Kendall Diebold, \"the IVF world as a whole is so isolating and lonely.\" \"And all of that has really been taken by this, and it has just been magnified and filled with sadness, grief, and anger.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Internal medicine specialist Dr. Rachel Charles, who also has lupus, talked about the rigorous treatment plan she had to follow in order to do IVF and get ready for an embryo transfer. Rather than move on with an embryo transfer, she made the decision in February to take a break from the daily hormone injections. In a previous interview, Rebecca Mathews, 36, who is the mother of two IVF-conceived children, told The 19th that she was shocked and angry at the same time when she learned of the decision. She still has a frozen embryo and is unsure of what to do with it.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating legal turmoil: IVF company registers to lobby Washington","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-legal-turmoil-ivf-company-registers-to-lobby-washington","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6902","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6871,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_date_gmt":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_content":"\n

The Biden administration<\/a> remained dedicated to its alliances in the strategically significant Indo-Pacific area, one day after a US$95 billion <\/a>foreign assistance package omitted economic help pledged for the region as the US strives to counter China's influence there. We at the White House<\/a> and State Department are still in favor of funding authorization and appropriation. Deputy assistant secretary Camille Dawson of the US State Department stated, \"We feel it's critically important to continue working in close concert and in support of the freely associated states<\/a>,\" referring to the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau. Dawson said this in answer to a query from the Post at a press conference on the second anniversary of US President Joe Biden's Indo-Pacific Strategy announcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Navigating a Strategic Landscape<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The agreement is viewed as critical to Washington's efforts to sustain<\/a> its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken once declared that \"our planet's future will be written,\" despite growing concerns<\/a> about what some have called Beijing's coercive influence campaign.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That tactic may have its roots in the Compact of Free Association (Cofa), an agreement<\/a> that has guided US relations with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau for many years. First signed in 1986, the Cofa accord provides financial help and a legal framework<\/a> allowing its residents to live, work, and attend school in the United States in exchange for the US military having access to the land, air, and sea of the three Pacific island<\/a> nations. While Palau's Cofa program is scheduled to expire in September, that of the Marshall Islands and Micronesia expired on September 30. Last year, new agreements were established and extended, and Biden promised the three nations US$7.1 billion<\/a> spread over 20 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

Reactions and responses<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The majority of Jewish Americans want more impartial policies, especially democratic ones, both domestically and regionally, according to Sharon Goldtvik, a political and communications consultant for progressive organizations. Eighty-nine percent of Jewish Americans believe that Israel has good justification to go to war with Hamas, and sixty-two percent think that Israel is conducting the conflict in Gaza in an appropriate manner. The letter was also signed by representatives of J Street, a Jewish-American organization that is \"pro-Israel, pro-peace\" and has frequently disagreed with Aipac. The signatories draw attention to the fact that AIPAC recently endorsed radical Republicans and that some members of Congress voted against recognizing President Joe Biden's win over Donald Trump in the 2021\u20132022 election cycle. It is also pointed out that the network of AIPAC received millions of dollars in donations from Trump supporters and used that money to support progressive candidates in Democratic primaries, mostly those who belong to racial and ethnic minorities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, The opinions of many Jewish Americans on AIPAC and its impact in US politics, particularly within the Democratic Party, have significantly changed as a result of this open letter. The discussion about US-Israel ties and AIPAC's influence on US foreign policy is expected to heat up as the 2024 elections draw near. <\/p>\n","post_title":"Jewish leaders oppose AIPAC's role in US elections","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"jewish-leaders-oppose-aipacs-role-in-us-elections","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6926","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6916,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-16 18:43:24","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-16 18:43:24","post_content":"\n

A measure that would force the popular video app TikTok to be banned nationally if its Chinese owner does not sell its shares was passed by the House. The MPs took action because they believed that the company's present ownership structure posed a threat to national security. After passing by a vote of 352-65<\/a>, the bill now moves on to the Senate, where its future is uncertain. With over 170 million users in the United States, TikTok is a fully-owned subsidiary of ByteDance Ltd., a Chinese technology company.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Legal and regulatory hurdles<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The congressmen claim that ByteDance is under the control of the Chinese government, which has the right to request access at any time to the data of TikTok users in the United States. The source of the concern is a series of national security legislation in China that require firms to cooperate with intelligence collection. The main conflict in Washington right now isn't between Joe Biden and Donald Trump. Politicians who wish to prohibit TikTok or compel its sale are at odds with those who wish to keep the well-known social media site unaltered. This problem in Washington, unlike most others, does not fall neatly into the Republican or Democratic camps. Trump chose to fight. During his presidency, he attempted to convince ByteDance Ltd., the company's Beijing-based owner of TikTok, to sell the business or risk a nationwide ban by using national security as a pretext. \"He perceived it as a means of penalizing China for the Covid-19 outbreak,\" states Stephen Myrow, the managing partner of Beacon Policy Advisors, a research organization that monitors the problem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Legal battles and court injunctions<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Bipartisan support for a ban in a key House committee vote last week set the process in motion. TikTok launched a ferocious lobbying effort, encouraging its video makers to contact their congressional representatives through push alerts. Most of it backfired. TikTok was accused by the Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party of \"lying to its users and using them to lobby Congress to benefit a foreign adversary.\" The committee was co-authored by Representatives Raja Krishnamoorthi, an Illinois Democrat, and Mike Gallagher, a Republican from Wisconsin. Nothing in Washington, including the TikTok ban, is ever as straightforward or obvious as it first appears. First, a group of legislators from both parties oppose it. Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, a libertarian Republican who opposes government intervention in business, particularly with Chinese-owned social media companies, finds it offensive. Many liberals, including the inventor herself, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, dislike it as well because they believe it would restrict the freedom of speech of youth and because they are wary of the China hawks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Global impact of a TikTok ban<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump had a meeting with Jeff Yass, the millionaire co-founder of Susquehanna International Group, a company that owns 15% of ByteDance and a significant Republican donor. Trump had changed his tune by Monday. During a phone interview with CNBC, he stated, \"A lot of people love TikTok.\" \"Many young children on TikTok will go insane without it.\" Ironically, the number of lawmakers seeking to put a ban on TikTok with conflicting agendas and large egos may be the largest hurdle to such a measure. While several senators have already begun to voice their disapproval of the House approach, no counterpart bill has been introduced in the Senate. It is anticipated that Senator Maria Cantwell, a Democrat from Washington, would eventually lead the charge on a TikTok law. Easter break is coming up soon. The legislative procedure is going to take longer. Politicians from both parties are also concerned about upsetting young people by interfering with their preferred app, especially with elections coming up.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Public opinion and political dynamics<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

While there is pressure for a TikTok ban, a forced divestment may be more plausible. Or the altercation can go like a well-known Washington narrative: a major altercation, loud headlines, and then nothing. TikTok is like dry tinder waiting to catch fire every time it comes up. However, it always fizzles out, and it will most likely do so once more in this instance. The issue is that it's hard to get an agreement on a single issue when everyone has a plan. There is a more localized worry, even if politicians will undoubtedly consider the business and international policy ramifications of outlawing TikTok. It's become commonplace to call an election after the hottest platform of the day since politicians use social media every election cycle to try to win over young people.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion,  One may make a compelling argument for the TikTok Election 2024. Every month, almost 170 million Americans use the app. About one-third of US individuals under 30 and roughly 43% of TikTok users say they routinely obtain their news from the platform, which is twice as many as three years ago, according to the Pew Research Center.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Slow roll: The uncertain fate of a TikTok ban","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"slow-roll-the-uncertain-fate-of-a-tiktok-ban","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6916","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6913,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-13 18:13:25","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-13 18:13:25","post_content":"\n

Legislators seeking to increase scrutiny are prompting lobbying companies in Washington to quickly withdraw their clients from China. The drive follows rising worries about China's influence and a recent spike in Chinese lobbying. The goal of legislators is to stop the People's Liberation Army (PLA) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)<\/a> from surreptitiously advancing agendas that undermine the interests of the American people by using legal loopholes. Senator John Cornyn, a Republican, told VOA's Mandarin Service that senators are almost done working on legislation that attempts to solve the issue. Members of the House have filed a bill to expose the exposing Foreign Influence in Lobbying Act, which was approved by the Senate last year. Cornyn co-sponsored the Senate legislation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The evolving landscape of US-China relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

\"Although there has been some opposition, we will keep working because it's critical to know who is genuinely influencing these legislators,\" Cornyn stated. Ensuring that individuals register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act has been the main priority. As you are aware, there have been several issues raised by persons failing to declare their lobbying agreements with foreign governments. Legislators are attempting to enact legislation that would close loopholes in the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 (LDA) and the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938 (FARA) in order to require greater transparency regarding foreign governments and political parties that engage in the organization, management, control, or supervision of lobbying efforts, whether or not they have received financial contributions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Scrutiny intensifies on lobbying practices<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

According to Cornyn, China presents a special difficulty. He remarked, \"The Chinese are unique in that they are forced to share information with the PLA and with their intelligence agencies; they do not have a true solely private sector.\" Thus, I would suggest that there should always be care when working with Chinese-owned businesses. The LDA, which mandates disclosure of domestic lobbying, and the FARA, which mandates disclosure of lobbying and other kinds of influence by foreign governments and political parties, control lobbying in the United States. But in 1995, FARA was changed to exclude people or firms representing foreigners if their activity isn't meant to help a foreign government or political party. Lobbyists consequently registered under the far less transparent LDA, which led to a sharp decline in FARA registrations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbyists navigate complex legal and ethical terrain<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The U.S. Department of Defense released the 1260H list, a list of \"Chinese military companies\" that operate directly or indirectly in the United States, in late January. This move prompted efforts to increase the inspection of China's lobbying operations. After that, lawmakers said that they were thinking of passing a bill that would make it illegal for lobbyists representing businesses on the list to meet with members of Congress, not even to address issues on behalf of their American clients. A chart that listed several Chinese enterprises, including some military firms, along with the names of their lobbying firms and whether or not they were included on the 1260H list started to circulate on Capitol Hill after the 1260H list was released. According to Robert Sutter, a professor of international affairs practice at George Washington University's Elliott School, Chinese military organizations' lobbying operations have traditionally been vague, and enforcement has been lax.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rising concerns over reputation and risk<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

As of late February, at least five American lobbying companies had lost Chinese business. Steptoe LLP and BGI, a Shenzhen biotech company, have ended their business relationship. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld ended its partnership with Xiaomi, a Chinese electronics business not on the 1260H list, and filed cease-and-desist filings to halt advocating for Hesai Group, a Chinese manufacturer of LiDARs. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Additionally, the Vogel Group has ceased lobbying on behalf of Complete Genomics, a division of BGI, a genetic technology business, and DJI, a Chinese drone manufacturer. Hesai and DJI are both included in the 1260H list. While its former parent firm, BGI, is on the list, Complete Genomics is not. While it is challenging to enact legislation that forbids Congressmen from meeting with anybody, Republican Senator Marco Rubio told VOA that certain congressional offices have made the decision to forgo meetings with lobbying firms that represent Chinese defense businesses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Chinese business lobbying in Washington was virtually nonexistent until a few years ago, according to Craig Singleton, a senior researcher at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, but that all changed when the US government started pursuing Huawei. According to Singleton, there is room for improvement in the Department of Justice's involvement in limiting the CCP's negative lobbying effect on Capitol Hill. The Department of Justice is in charge of implementing and upholding FARA.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US lobbyists reevaluate ties: Shedding Chinese clients amid heightened oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-lobbyists-reevaluate-ties-shedding-chinese-clients-amid-heightened-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6913","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6902,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_content":"\n

After an Alabama judge deemed frozen embryos to be children, Democrats attempted in vain to ram legislation through the U.S. Senate that would have guaranteed Americans' access to IVF and other assisted reproductive technologies. At least three Alabama IVF clinics stopped doing IVF, which combines eggs and sperm in a lab dish for infertile couples, after the state Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos should be treated like children. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Challenges in the courtroom<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Because nonviable embryos are occasionally discarded or utilized for research, the Alabama court's decision has sparked worries that anyone participating in IVF may be prosecuted, and that it may also inspire other states to take similar legal action. Sen. Tammy Duckworth<\/a>, a Democrat and veteran of the Iraq War who was seriously injured in battle in 2004; she requested that the Senate take up her \"Access to Family Building Act\" legislation right now. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Alabama Supreme Court's decision last month that frozen embryos were lawfully regarded infants sparked fresh requests for federal safeguards for reproductive therapies, which led to the IVF business CooperSurgical filing. The decision, which caused some clinics in Alabama to stop IVF procedures, has set up a nationwide IVF firestorm. As the election draws near, Democrats are hammering Republicans on the matter, while the GOP is rushing to take positions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbying in Washington<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Thorn Run Partners, a Washington-based company licensed to effectively advocate on \"Fertility\" and \"Maternal Health,\" was engaged by CooperSurgical. This week, lawmakers in Alabama's Republican-controlled legislature passed a bill to safeguard IVF procedures. However, conservatives swiftly prevented the Senate from adopting the first federal policy. The Alabama Wrongful Death of a Minor Act made the destruction of embryos illegal, according to the court's ruling in that state's case. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Families alleging CooperSurgical caused the loss of their embryos are suing the corporation for undisclosed damages in many jurisdictions over identical allegations. CooperSurgical representative Adeena Fried responded, \"The company wanted to see that IVF remains accessible nationwide,\" when questioned about the choice to lobby. \"Our goal is to guarantee that the greatest goods and innovations can be utilized in Alabama and throughout the country to strengthen families and welcome new members into the world,\" the spokesperson stated. \"As of right now, a lot of clinics in Alabama are closed, and legislation nationwide needs to support the entire fertility industry.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The role of lobbying in reproductive technology<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In a similar vein, GenBioPro, a different reproductive health care firm, which manufactures mifepristone generically, approached Washington following a siege of their product. In 2022, a lobbying firm filed to represent the company, and the following year, GenBioPro filed a lawsuit against the FDA to maintain the drug's availability. CooperSurgical, a Connecticut-based corporation, recruited three seasoned Hill staffers, one of which was Jessie Brairton, a former Eli Lilly lobbyist and staff member of Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas). The other two lobbyists are Jacky Usyk, a veteran Democratic Senate assistant, and Andrew Rosenberg, a former aide to Sen. Ed Kennedy (D-Mass.), who co-founded the company. Federal filings state that CooperSurgical has not previously registered to lobby. Beasley met with Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra on Tuesday to talk about the turmoil and uncertainty caused by the Alabama Supreme Court decision that threatens IVF, as well as other individuals impacted by the decision. It caused many people's reproductive treatments to come to an abrupt halt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Balancing profit and patient welfare<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Every woman present at the discussion discussed the intense psychological stress and loneliness associated with receiving reproductive therapy. The epidemic had already caused some of them to have their reproductive treatments interrupted, only for the Supreme Court's ruling to throw them off course once again. According to fertility patient and nurse practitioner Kendall Diebold, \"the IVF world as a whole is so isolating and lonely.\" \"And all of that has really been taken by this, and it has just been magnified and filled with sadness, grief, and anger.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Internal medicine specialist Dr. Rachel Charles, who also has lupus, talked about the rigorous treatment plan she had to follow in order to do IVF and get ready for an embryo transfer. Rather than move on with an embryo transfer, she made the decision in February to take a break from the daily hormone injections. In a previous interview, Rebecca Mathews, 36, who is the mother of two IVF-conceived children, told The 19th that she was shocked and angry at the same time when she learned of the decision. She still has a frozen embryo and is unsure of what to do with it.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating legal turmoil: IVF company registers to lobby Washington","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-legal-turmoil-ivf-company-registers-to-lobby-washington","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6902","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6871,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_date_gmt":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_content":"\n

The Biden administration<\/a> remained dedicated to its alliances in the strategically significant Indo-Pacific area, one day after a US$95 billion <\/a>foreign assistance package omitted economic help pledged for the region as the US strives to counter China's influence there. We at the White House<\/a> and State Department are still in favor of funding authorization and appropriation. Deputy assistant secretary Camille Dawson of the US State Department stated, \"We feel it's critically important to continue working in close concert and in support of the freely associated states<\/a>,\" referring to the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau. Dawson said this in answer to a query from the Post at a press conference on the second anniversary of US President Joe Biden's Indo-Pacific Strategy announcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Navigating a Strategic Landscape<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The agreement is viewed as critical to Washington's efforts to sustain<\/a> its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken once declared that \"our planet's future will be written,\" despite growing concerns<\/a> about what some have called Beijing's coercive influence campaign.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That tactic may have its roots in the Compact of Free Association (Cofa), an agreement<\/a> that has guided US relations with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau for many years. First signed in 1986, the Cofa accord provides financial help and a legal framework<\/a> allowing its residents to live, work, and attend school in the United States in exchange for the US military having access to the land, air, and sea of the three Pacific island<\/a> nations. While Palau's Cofa program is scheduled to expire in September, that of the Marshall Islands and Micronesia expired on September 30. Last year, new agreements were established and extended, and Biden promised the three nations US$7.1 billion<\/a> spread over 20 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

The American Israel Public Affairs Committee's role in this year's US elections was sent by dozens of Jewish Americans. Aipac is an essential link in the chain that holds in place the unbearable tragedy of Israel\/Palestine, given that Israel is so isolated internationally that it could not continue its inhumane treatment of the Palestinians without US political and military support,\" This election year, Aipac, a significant US lobbying group that supports pro-Israel policies in Washington, has been using its clout to counter progressive Democrats who support a ceasefire. Jewish scholars, activists, corporate executives, and celebrities including Wallace Shawn, who starred in the Princess Bride, and Tony Kushner, a playwright and author have signed the petition. Aipac is anticipated to spend $100 million<\/a> in 2024 \"taking aim at candidates they deem insufficiently supportive of Israel,\" according to US media reports citing persons knowledgeable with the situation. The pro-Israel group has mostly targeted \"The Squad,\" a small group of Democratic members of the House of Representatives that includes Cori Bush and Rashida Tlaib. Members of the squad have been among the most ardent supporters in Washington of ending the Israel-Gaza conflict and stopping the growth of illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Reactions and responses<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The majority of Jewish Americans want more impartial policies, especially democratic ones, both domestically and regionally, according to Sharon Goldtvik, a political and communications consultant for progressive organizations. Eighty-nine percent of Jewish Americans believe that Israel has good justification to go to war with Hamas, and sixty-two percent think that Israel is conducting the conflict in Gaza in an appropriate manner. The letter was also signed by representatives of J Street, a Jewish-American organization that is \"pro-Israel, pro-peace\" and has frequently disagreed with Aipac. The signatories draw attention to the fact that AIPAC recently endorsed radical Republicans and that some members of Congress voted against recognizing President Joe Biden's win over Donald Trump in the 2021\u20132022 election cycle. It is also pointed out that the network of AIPAC received millions of dollars in donations from Trump supporters and used that money to support progressive candidates in Democratic primaries, mostly those who belong to racial and ethnic minorities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, The opinions of many Jewish Americans on AIPAC and its impact in US politics, particularly within the Democratic Party, have significantly changed as a result of this open letter. The discussion about US-Israel ties and AIPAC's influence on US foreign policy is expected to heat up as the 2024 elections draw near. <\/p>\n","post_title":"Jewish leaders oppose AIPAC's role in US elections","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"jewish-leaders-oppose-aipacs-role-in-us-elections","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6926","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6916,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-16 18:43:24","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-16 18:43:24","post_content":"\n

A measure that would force the popular video app TikTok to be banned nationally if its Chinese owner does not sell its shares was passed by the House. The MPs took action because they believed that the company's present ownership structure posed a threat to national security. After passing by a vote of 352-65<\/a>, the bill now moves on to the Senate, where its future is uncertain. With over 170 million users in the United States, TikTok is a fully-owned subsidiary of ByteDance Ltd., a Chinese technology company.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Legal and regulatory hurdles<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The congressmen claim that ByteDance is under the control of the Chinese government, which has the right to request access at any time to the data of TikTok users in the United States. The source of the concern is a series of national security legislation in China that require firms to cooperate with intelligence collection. The main conflict in Washington right now isn't between Joe Biden and Donald Trump. Politicians who wish to prohibit TikTok or compel its sale are at odds with those who wish to keep the well-known social media site unaltered. This problem in Washington, unlike most others, does not fall neatly into the Republican or Democratic camps. Trump chose to fight. During his presidency, he attempted to convince ByteDance Ltd., the company's Beijing-based owner of TikTok, to sell the business or risk a nationwide ban by using national security as a pretext. \"He perceived it as a means of penalizing China for the Covid-19 outbreak,\" states Stephen Myrow, the managing partner of Beacon Policy Advisors, a research organization that monitors the problem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Legal battles and court injunctions<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Bipartisan support for a ban in a key House committee vote last week set the process in motion. TikTok launched a ferocious lobbying effort, encouraging its video makers to contact their congressional representatives through push alerts. Most of it backfired. TikTok was accused by the Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party of \"lying to its users and using them to lobby Congress to benefit a foreign adversary.\" The committee was co-authored by Representatives Raja Krishnamoorthi, an Illinois Democrat, and Mike Gallagher, a Republican from Wisconsin. Nothing in Washington, including the TikTok ban, is ever as straightforward or obvious as it first appears. First, a group of legislators from both parties oppose it. Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, a libertarian Republican who opposes government intervention in business, particularly with Chinese-owned social media companies, finds it offensive. Many liberals, including the inventor herself, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, dislike it as well because they believe it would restrict the freedom of speech of youth and because they are wary of the China hawks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Global impact of a TikTok ban<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump had a meeting with Jeff Yass, the millionaire co-founder of Susquehanna International Group, a company that owns 15% of ByteDance and a significant Republican donor. Trump had changed his tune by Monday. During a phone interview with CNBC, he stated, \"A lot of people love TikTok.\" \"Many young children on TikTok will go insane without it.\" Ironically, the number of lawmakers seeking to put a ban on TikTok with conflicting agendas and large egos may be the largest hurdle to such a measure. While several senators have already begun to voice their disapproval of the House approach, no counterpart bill has been introduced in the Senate. It is anticipated that Senator Maria Cantwell, a Democrat from Washington, would eventually lead the charge on a TikTok law. Easter break is coming up soon. The legislative procedure is going to take longer. Politicians from both parties are also concerned about upsetting young people by interfering with their preferred app, especially with elections coming up.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Public opinion and political dynamics<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

While there is pressure for a TikTok ban, a forced divestment may be more plausible. Or the altercation can go like a well-known Washington narrative: a major altercation, loud headlines, and then nothing. TikTok is like dry tinder waiting to catch fire every time it comes up. However, it always fizzles out, and it will most likely do so once more in this instance. The issue is that it's hard to get an agreement on a single issue when everyone has a plan. There is a more localized worry, even if politicians will undoubtedly consider the business and international policy ramifications of outlawing TikTok. It's become commonplace to call an election after the hottest platform of the day since politicians use social media every election cycle to try to win over young people.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion,  One may make a compelling argument for the TikTok Election 2024. Every month, almost 170 million Americans use the app. About one-third of US individuals under 30 and roughly 43% of TikTok users say they routinely obtain their news from the platform, which is twice as many as three years ago, according to the Pew Research Center.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Slow roll: The uncertain fate of a TikTok ban","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"slow-roll-the-uncertain-fate-of-a-tiktok-ban","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6916","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6913,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-13 18:13:25","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-13 18:13:25","post_content":"\n

Legislators seeking to increase scrutiny are prompting lobbying companies in Washington to quickly withdraw their clients from China. The drive follows rising worries about China's influence and a recent spike in Chinese lobbying. The goal of legislators is to stop the People's Liberation Army (PLA) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)<\/a> from surreptitiously advancing agendas that undermine the interests of the American people by using legal loopholes. Senator John Cornyn, a Republican, told VOA's Mandarin Service that senators are almost done working on legislation that attempts to solve the issue. Members of the House have filed a bill to expose the exposing Foreign Influence in Lobbying Act, which was approved by the Senate last year. Cornyn co-sponsored the Senate legislation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The evolving landscape of US-China relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

\"Although there has been some opposition, we will keep working because it's critical to know who is genuinely influencing these legislators,\" Cornyn stated. Ensuring that individuals register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act has been the main priority. As you are aware, there have been several issues raised by persons failing to declare their lobbying agreements with foreign governments. Legislators are attempting to enact legislation that would close loopholes in the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 (LDA) and the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938 (FARA) in order to require greater transparency regarding foreign governments and political parties that engage in the organization, management, control, or supervision of lobbying efforts, whether or not they have received financial contributions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Scrutiny intensifies on lobbying practices<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

According to Cornyn, China presents a special difficulty. He remarked, \"The Chinese are unique in that they are forced to share information with the PLA and with their intelligence agencies; they do not have a true solely private sector.\" Thus, I would suggest that there should always be care when working with Chinese-owned businesses. The LDA, which mandates disclosure of domestic lobbying, and the FARA, which mandates disclosure of lobbying and other kinds of influence by foreign governments and political parties, control lobbying in the United States. But in 1995, FARA was changed to exclude people or firms representing foreigners if their activity isn't meant to help a foreign government or political party. Lobbyists consequently registered under the far less transparent LDA, which led to a sharp decline in FARA registrations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbyists navigate complex legal and ethical terrain<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The U.S. Department of Defense released the 1260H list, a list of \"Chinese military companies\" that operate directly or indirectly in the United States, in late January. This move prompted efforts to increase the inspection of China's lobbying operations. After that, lawmakers said that they were thinking of passing a bill that would make it illegal for lobbyists representing businesses on the list to meet with members of Congress, not even to address issues on behalf of their American clients. A chart that listed several Chinese enterprises, including some military firms, along with the names of their lobbying firms and whether or not they were included on the 1260H list started to circulate on Capitol Hill after the 1260H list was released. According to Robert Sutter, a professor of international affairs practice at George Washington University's Elliott School, Chinese military organizations' lobbying operations have traditionally been vague, and enforcement has been lax.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rising concerns over reputation and risk<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

As of late February, at least five American lobbying companies had lost Chinese business. Steptoe LLP and BGI, a Shenzhen biotech company, have ended their business relationship. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld ended its partnership with Xiaomi, a Chinese electronics business not on the 1260H list, and filed cease-and-desist filings to halt advocating for Hesai Group, a Chinese manufacturer of LiDARs. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Additionally, the Vogel Group has ceased lobbying on behalf of Complete Genomics, a division of BGI, a genetic technology business, and DJI, a Chinese drone manufacturer. Hesai and DJI are both included in the 1260H list. While its former parent firm, BGI, is on the list, Complete Genomics is not. While it is challenging to enact legislation that forbids Congressmen from meeting with anybody, Republican Senator Marco Rubio told VOA that certain congressional offices have made the decision to forgo meetings with lobbying firms that represent Chinese defense businesses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Chinese business lobbying in Washington was virtually nonexistent until a few years ago, according to Craig Singleton, a senior researcher at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, but that all changed when the US government started pursuing Huawei. According to Singleton, there is room for improvement in the Department of Justice's involvement in limiting the CCP's negative lobbying effect on Capitol Hill. The Department of Justice is in charge of implementing and upholding FARA.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US lobbyists reevaluate ties: Shedding Chinese clients amid heightened oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-lobbyists-reevaluate-ties-shedding-chinese-clients-amid-heightened-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6913","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6902,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_content":"\n

After an Alabama judge deemed frozen embryos to be children, Democrats attempted in vain to ram legislation through the U.S. Senate that would have guaranteed Americans' access to IVF and other assisted reproductive technologies. At least three Alabama IVF clinics stopped doing IVF, which combines eggs and sperm in a lab dish for infertile couples, after the state Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos should be treated like children. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Challenges in the courtroom<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Because nonviable embryos are occasionally discarded or utilized for research, the Alabama court's decision has sparked worries that anyone participating in IVF may be prosecuted, and that it may also inspire other states to take similar legal action. Sen. Tammy Duckworth<\/a>, a Democrat and veteran of the Iraq War who was seriously injured in battle in 2004; she requested that the Senate take up her \"Access to Family Building Act\" legislation right now. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Alabama Supreme Court's decision last month that frozen embryos were lawfully regarded infants sparked fresh requests for federal safeguards for reproductive therapies, which led to the IVF business CooperSurgical filing. The decision, which caused some clinics in Alabama to stop IVF procedures, has set up a nationwide IVF firestorm. As the election draws near, Democrats are hammering Republicans on the matter, while the GOP is rushing to take positions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbying in Washington<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Thorn Run Partners, a Washington-based company licensed to effectively advocate on \"Fertility\" and \"Maternal Health,\" was engaged by CooperSurgical. This week, lawmakers in Alabama's Republican-controlled legislature passed a bill to safeguard IVF procedures. However, conservatives swiftly prevented the Senate from adopting the first federal policy. The Alabama Wrongful Death of a Minor Act made the destruction of embryos illegal, according to the court's ruling in that state's case. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Families alleging CooperSurgical caused the loss of their embryos are suing the corporation for undisclosed damages in many jurisdictions over identical allegations. CooperSurgical representative Adeena Fried responded, \"The company wanted to see that IVF remains accessible nationwide,\" when questioned about the choice to lobby. \"Our goal is to guarantee that the greatest goods and innovations can be utilized in Alabama and throughout the country to strengthen families and welcome new members into the world,\" the spokesperson stated. \"As of right now, a lot of clinics in Alabama are closed, and legislation nationwide needs to support the entire fertility industry.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The role of lobbying in reproductive technology<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In a similar vein, GenBioPro, a different reproductive health care firm, which manufactures mifepristone generically, approached Washington following a siege of their product. In 2022, a lobbying firm filed to represent the company, and the following year, GenBioPro filed a lawsuit against the FDA to maintain the drug's availability. CooperSurgical, a Connecticut-based corporation, recruited three seasoned Hill staffers, one of which was Jessie Brairton, a former Eli Lilly lobbyist and staff member of Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas). The other two lobbyists are Jacky Usyk, a veteran Democratic Senate assistant, and Andrew Rosenberg, a former aide to Sen. Ed Kennedy (D-Mass.), who co-founded the company. Federal filings state that CooperSurgical has not previously registered to lobby. Beasley met with Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra on Tuesday to talk about the turmoil and uncertainty caused by the Alabama Supreme Court decision that threatens IVF, as well as other individuals impacted by the decision. It caused many people's reproductive treatments to come to an abrupt halt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Balancing profit and patient welfare<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Every woman present at the discussion discussed the intense psychological stress and loneliness associated with receiving reproductive therapy. The epidemic had already caused some of them to have their reproductive treatments interrupted, only for the Supreme Court's ruling to throw them off course once again. According to fertility patient and nurse practitioner Kendall Diebold, \"the IVF world as a whole is so isolating and lonely.\" \"And all of that has really been taken by this, and it has just been magnified and filled with sadness, grief, and anger.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Internal medicine specialist Dr. Rachel Charles, who also has lupus, talked about the rigorous treatment plan she had to follow in order to do IVF and get ready for an embryo transfer. Rather than move on with an embryo transfer, she made the decision in February to take a break from the daily hormone injections. In a previous interview, Rebecca Mathews, 36, who is the mother of two IVF-conceived children, told The 19th that she was shocked and angry at the same time when she learned of the decision. She still has a frozen embryo and is unsure of what to do with it.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating legal turmoil: IVF company registers to lobby Washington","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-legal-turmoil-ivf-company-registers-to-lobby-washington","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6902","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6871,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_date_gmt":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_content":"\n

The Biden administration<\/a> remained dedicated to its alliances in the strategically significant Indo-Pacific area, one day after a US$95 billion <\/a>foreign assistance package omitted economic help pledged for the region as the US strives to counter China's influence there. We at the White House<\/a> and State Department are still in favor of funding authorization and appropriation. Deputy assistant secretary Camille Dawson of the US State Department stated, \"We feel it's critically important to continue working in close concert and in support of the freely associated states<\/a>,\" referring to the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau. Dawson said this in answer to a query from the Post at a press conference on the second anniversary of US President Joe Biden's Indo-Pacific Strategy announcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Navigating a Strategic Landscape<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The agreement is viewed as critical to Washington's efforts to sustain<\/a> its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken once declared that \"our planet's future will be written,\" despite growing concerns<\/a> about what some have called Beijing's coercive influence campaign.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That tactic may have its roots in the Compact of Free Association (Cofa), an agreement<\/a> that has guided US relations with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau for many years. First signed in 1986, the Cofa accord provides financial help and a legal framework<\/a> allowing its residents to live, work, and attend school in the United States in exchange for the US military having access to the land, air, and sea of the three Pacific island<\/a> nations. While Palau's Cofa program is scheduled to expire in September, that of the Marshall Islands and Micronesia expired on September 30. Last year, new agreements were established and extended, and Biden promised the three nations US$7.1 billion<\/a> spread over 20 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

The Letter of opposition<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The American Israel Public Affairs Committee's role in this year's US elections was sent by dozens of Jewish Americans. Aipac is an essential link in the chain that holds in place the unbearable tragedy of Israel\/Palestine, given that Israel is so isolated internationally that it could not continue its inhumane treatment of the Palestinians without US political and military support,\" This election year, Aipac, a significant US lobbying group that supports pro-Israel policies in Washington, has been using its clout to counter progressive Democrats who support a ceasefire. Jewish scholars, activists, corporate executives, and celebrities including Wallace Shawn, who starred in the Princess Bride, and Tony Kushner, a playwright and author have signed the petition. Aipac is anticipated to spend $100 million<\/a> in 2024 \"taking aim at candidates they deem insufficiently supportive of Israel,\" according to US media reports citing persons knowledgeable with the situation. The pro-Israel group has mostly targeted \"The Squad,\" a small group of Democratic members of the House of Representatives that includes Cori Bush and Rashida Tlaib. Members of the squad have been among the most ardent supporters in Washington of ending the Israel-Gaza conflict and stopping the growth of illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Reactions and responses<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The majority of Jewish Americans want more impartial policies, especially democratic ones, both domestically and regionally, according to Sharon Goldtvik, a political and communications consultant for progressive organizations. Eighty-nine percent of Jewish Americans believe that Israel has good justification to go to war with Hamas, and sixty-two percent think that Israel is conducting the conflict in Gaza in an appropriate manner. The letter was also signed by representatives of J Street, a Jewish-American organization that is \"pro-Israel, pro-peace\" and has frequently disagreed with Aipac. The signatories draw attention to the fact that AIPAC recently endorsed radical Republicans and that some members of Congress voted against recognizing President Joe Biden's win over Donald Trump in the 2021\u20132022 election cycle. It is also pointed out that the network of AIPAC received millions of dollars in donations from Trump supporters and used that money to support progressive candidates in Democratic primaries, mostly those who belong to racial and ethnic minorities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, The opinions of many Jewish Americans on AIPAC and its impact in US politics, particularly within the Democratic Party, have significantly changed as a result of this open letter. The discussion about US-Israel ties and AIPAC's influence on US foreign policy is expected to heat up as the 2024 elections draw near. <\/p>\n","post_title":"Jewish leaders oppose AIPAC's role in US elections","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"jewish-leaders-oppose-aipacs-role-in-us-elections","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6926","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6916,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-16 18:43:24","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-16 18:43:24","post_content":"\n

A measure that would force the popular video app TikTok to be banned nationally if its Chinese owner does not sell its shares was passed by the House. The MPs took action because they believed that the company's present ownership structure posed a threat to national security. After passing by a vote of 352-65<\/a>, the bill now moves on to the Senate, where its future is uncertain. With over 170 million users in the United States, TikTok is a fully-owned subsidiary of ByteDance Ltd., a Chinese technology company.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Legal and regulatory hurdles<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The congressmen claim that ByteDance is under the control of the Chinese government, which has the right to request access at any time to the data of TikTok users in the United States. The source of the concern is a series of national security legislation in China that require firms to cooperate with intelligence collection. The main conflict in Washington right now isn't between Joe Biden and Donald Trump. Politicians who wish to prohibit TikTok or compel its sale are at odds with those who wish to keep the well-known social media site unaltered. This problem in Washington, unlike most others, does not fall neatly into the Republican or Democratic camps. Trump chose to fight. During his presidency, he attempted to convince ByteDance Ltd., the company's Beijing-based owner of TikTok, to sell the business or risk a nationwide ban by using national security as a pretext. \"He perceived it as a means of penalizing China for the Covid-19 outbreak,\" states Stephen Myrow, the managing partner of Beacon Policy Advisors, a research organization that monitors the problem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Legal battles and court injunctions<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Bipartisan support for a ban in a key House committee vote last week set the process in motion. TikTok launched a ferocious lobbying effort, encouraging its video makers to contact their congressional representatives through push alerts. Most of it backfired. TikTok was accused by the Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party of \"lying to its users and using them to lobby Congress to benefit a foreign adversary.\" The committee was co-authored by Representatives Raja Krishnamoorthi, an Illinois Democrat, and Mike Gallagher, a Republican from Wisconsin. Nothing in Washington, including the TikTok ban, is ever as straightforward or obvious as it first appears. First, a group of legislators from both parties oppose it. Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, a libertarian Republican who opposes government intervention in business, particularly with Chinese-owned social media companies, finds it offensive. Many liberals, including the inventor herself, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, dislike it as well because they believe it would restrict the freedom of speech of youth and because they are wary of the China hawks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Global impact of a TikTok ban<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump had a meeting with Jeff Yass, the millionaire co-founder of Susquehanna International Group, a company that owns 15% of ByteDance and a significant Republican donor. Trump had changed his tune by Monday. During a phone interview with CNBC, he stated, \"A lot of people love TikTok.\" \"Many young children on TikTok will go insane without it.\" Ironically, the number of lawmakers seeking to put a ban on TikTok with conflicting agendas and large egos may be the largest hurdle to such a measure. While several senators have already begun to voice their disapproval of the House approach, no counterpart bill has been introduced in the Senate. It is anticipated that Senator Maria Cantwell, a Democrat from Washington, would eventually lead the charge on a TikTok law. Easter break is coming up soon. The legislative procedure is going to take longer. Politicians from both parties are also concerned about upsetting young people by interfering with their preferred app, especially with elections coming up.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Public opinion and political dynamics<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

While there is pressure for a TikTok ban, a forced divestment may be more plausible. Or the altercation can go like a well-known Washington narrative: a major altercation, loud headlines, and then nothing. TikTok is like dry tinder waiting to catch fire every time it comes up. However, it always fizzles out, and it will most likely do so once more in this instance. The issue is that it's hard to get an agreement on a single issue when everyone has a plan. There is a more localized worry, even if politicians will undoubtedly consider the business and international policy ramifications of outlawing TikTok. It's become commonplace to call an election after the hottest platform of the day since politicians use social media every election cycle to try to win over young people.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion,  One may make a compelling argument for the TikTok Election 2024. Every month, almost 170 million Americans use the app. About one-third of US individuals under 30 and roughly 43% of TikTok users say they routinely obtain their news from the platform, which is twice as many as three years ago, according to the Pew Research Center.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Slow roll: The uncertain fate of a TikTok ban","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"slow-roll-the-uncertain-fate-of-a-tiktok-ban","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6916","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6913,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-13 18:13:25","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-13 18:13:25","post_content":"\n

Legislators seeking to increase scrutiny are prompting lobbying companies in Washington to quickly withdraw their clients from China. The drive follows rising worries about China's influence and a recent spike in Chinese lobbying. The goal of legislators is to stop the People's Liberation Army (PLA) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)<\/a> from surreptitiously advancing agendas that undermine the interests of the American people by using legal loopholes. Senator John Cornyn, a Republican, told VOA's Mandarin Service that senators are almost done working on legislation that attempts to solve the issue. Members of the House have filed a bill to expose the exposing Foreign Influence in Lobbying Act, which was approved by the Senate last year. Cornyn co-sponsored the Senate legislation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The evolving landscape of US-China relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

\"Although there has been some opposition, we will keep working because it's critical to know who is genuinely influencing these legislators,\" Cornyn stated. Ensuring that individuals register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act has been the main priority. As you are aware, there have been several issues raised by persons failing to declare their lobbying agreements with foreign governments. Legislators are attempting to enact legislation that would close loopholes in the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 (LDA) and the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938 (FARA) in order to require greater transparency regarding foreign governments and political parties that engage in the organization, management, control, or supervision of lobbying efforts, whether or not they have received financial contributions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Scrutiny intensifies on lobbying practices<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

According to Cornyn, China presents a special difficulty. He remarked, \"The Chinese are unique in that they are forced to share information with the PLA and with their intelligence agencies; they do not have a true solely private sector.\" Thus, I would suggest that there should always be care when working with Chinese-owned businesses. The LDA, which mandates disclosure of domestic lobbying, and the FARA, which mandates disclosure of lobbying and other kinds of influence by foreign governments and political parties, control lobbying in the United States. But in 1995, FARA was changed to exclude people or firms representing foreigners if their activity isn't meant to help a foreign government or political party. Lobbyists consequently registered under the far less transparent LDA, which led to a sharp decline in FARA registrations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbyists navigate complex legal and ethical terrain<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The U.S. Department of Defense released the 1260H list, a list of \"Chinese military companies\" that operate directly or indirectly in the United States, in late January. This move prompted efforts to increase the inspection of China's lobbying operations. After that, lawmakers said that they were thinking of passing a bill that would make it illegal for lobbyists representing businesses on the list to meet with members of Congress, not even to address issues on behalf of their American clients. A chart that listed several Chinese enterprises, including some military firms, along with the names of their lobbying firms and whether or not they were included on the 1260H list started to circulate on Capitol Hill after the 1260H list was released. According to Robert Sutter, a professor of international affairs practice at George Washington University's Elliott School, Chinese military organizations' lobbying operations have traditionally been vague, and enforcement has been lax.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rising concerns over reputation and risk<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

As of late February, at least five American lobbying companies had lost Chinese business. Steptoe LLP and BGI, a Shenzhen biotech company, have ended their business relationship. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld ended its partnership with Xiaomi, a Chinese electronics business not on the 1260H list, and filed cease-and-desist filings to halt advocating for Hesai Group, a Chinese manufacturer of LiDARs. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Additionally, the Vogel Group has ceased lobbying on behalf of Complete Genomics, a division of BGI, a genetic technology business, and DJI, a Chinese drone manufacturer. Hesai and DJI are both included in the 1260H list. While its former parent firm, BGI, is on the list, Complete Genomics is not. While it is challenging to enact legislation that forbids Congressmen from meeting with anybody, Republican Senator Marco Rubio told VOA that certain congressional offices have made the decision to forgo meetings with lobbying firms that represent Chinese defense businesses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Chinese business lobbying in Washington was virtually nonexistent until a few years ago, according to Craig Singleton, a senior researcher at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, but that all changed when the US government started pursuing Huawei. According to Singleton, there is room for improvement in the Department of Justice's involvement in limiting the CCP's negative lobbying effect on Capitol Hill. The Department of Justice is in charge of implementing and upholding FARA.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US lobbyists reevaluate ties: Shedding Chinese clients amid heightened oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-lobbyists-reevaluate-ties-shedding-chinese-clients-amid-heightened-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6913","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6902,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_content":"\n

After an Alabama judge deemed frozen embryos to be children, Democrats attempted in vain to ram legislation through the U.S. Senate that would have guaranteed Americans' access to IVF and other assisted reproductive technologies. At least three Alabama IVF clinics stopped doing IVF, which combines eggs and sperm in a lab dish for infertile couples, after the state Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos should be treated like children. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Challenges in the courtroom<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Because nonviable embryos are occasionally discarded or utilized for research, the Alabama court's decision has sparked worries that anyone participating in IVF may be prosecuted, and that it may also inspire other states to take similar legal action. Sen. Tammy Duckworth<\/a>, a Democrat and veteran of the Iraq War who was seriously injured in battle in 2004; she requested that the Senate take up her \"Access to Family Building Act\" legislation right now. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Alabama Supreme Court's decision last month that frozen embryos were lawfully regarded infants sparked fresh requests for federal safeguards for reproductive therapies, which led to the IVF business CooperSurgical filing. The decision, which caused some clinics in Alabama to stop IVF procedures, has set up a nationwide IVF firestorm. As the election draws near, Democrats are hammering Republicans on the matter, while the GOP is rushing to take positions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbying in Washington<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Thorn Run Partners, a Washington-based company licensed to effectively advocate on \"Fertility\" and \"Maternal Health,\" was engaged by CooperSurgical. This week, lawmakers in Alabama's Republican-controlled legislature passed a bill to safeguard IVF procedures. However, conservatives swiftly prevented the Senate from adopting the first federal policy. The Alabama Wrongful Death of a Minor Act made the destruction of embryos illegal, according to the court's ruling in that state's case. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Families alleging CooperSurgical caused the loss of their embryos are suing the corporation for undisclosed damages in many jurisdictions over identical allegations. CooperSurgical representative Adeena Fried responded, \"The company wanted to see that IVF remains accessible nationwide,\" when questioned about the choice to lobby. \"Our goal is to guarantee that the greatest goods and innovations can be utilized in Alabama and throughout the country to strengthen families and welcome new members into the world,\" the spokesperson stated. \"As of right now, a lot of clinics in Alabama are closed, and legislation nationwide needs to support the entire fertility industry.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The role of lobbying in reproductive technology<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In a similar vein, GenBioPro, a different reproductive health care firm, which manufactures mifepristone generically, approached Washington following a siege of their product. In 2022, a lobbying firm filed to represent the company, and the following year, GenBioPro filed a lawsuit against the FDA to maintain the drug's availability. CooperSurgical, a Connecticut-based corporation, recruited three seasoned Hill staffers, one of which was Jessie Brairton, a former Eli Lilly lobbyist and staff member of Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas). The other two lobbyists are Jacky Usyk, a veteran Democratic Senate assistant, and Andrew Rosenberg, a former aide to Sen. Ed Kennedy (D-Mass.), who co-founded the company. Federal filings state that CooperSurgical has not previously registered to lobby. Beasley met with Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra on Tuesday to talk about the turmoil and uncertainty caused by the Alabama Supreme Court decision that threatens IVF, as well as other individuals impacted by the decision. It caused many people's reproductive treatments to come to an abrupt halt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Balancing profit and patient welfare<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Every woman present at the discussion discussed the intense psychological stress and loneliness associated with receiving reproductive therapy. The epidemic had already caused some of them to have their reproductive treatments interrupted, only for the Supreme Court's ruling to throw them off course once again. According to fertility patient and nurse practitioner Kendall Diebold, \"the IVF world as a whole is so isolating and lonely.\" \"And all of that has really been taken by this, and it has just been magnified and filled with sadness, grief, and anger.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Internal medicine specialist Dr. Rachel Charles, who also has lupus, talked about the rigorous treatment plan she had to follow in order to do IVF and get ready for an embryo transfer. Rather than move on with an embryo transfer, she made the decision in February to take a break from the daily hormone injections. In a previous interview, Rebecca Mathews, 36, who is the mother of two IVF-conceived children, told The 19th that she was shocked and angry at the same time when she learned of the decision. She still has a frozen embryo and is unsure of what to do with it.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating legal turmoil: IVF company registers to lobby Washington","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-legal-turmoil-ivf-company-registers-to-lobby-washington","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6902","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6871,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_date_gmt":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_content":"\n

The Biden administration<\/a> remained dedicated to its alliances in the strategically significant Indo-Pacific area, one day after a US$95 billion <\/a>foreign assistance package omitted economic help pledged for the region as the US strives to counter China's influence there. We at the White House<\/a> and State Department are still in favor of funding authorization and appropriation. Deputy assistant secretary Camille Dawson of the US State Department stated, \"We feel it's critically important to continue working in close concert and in support of the freely associated states<\/a>,\" referring to the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau. Dawson said this in answer to a query from the Post at a press conference on the second anniversary of US President Joe Biden's Indo-Pacific Strategy announcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Navigating a Strategic Landscape<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The agreement is viewed as critical to Washington's efforts to sustain<\/a> its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken once declared that \"our planet's future will be written,\" despite growing concerns<\/a> about what some have called Beijing's coercive influence campaign.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That tactic may have its roots in the Compact of Free Association (Cofa), an agreement<\/a> that has guided US relations with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau for many years. First signed in 1986, the Cofa accord provides financial help and a legal framework<\/a> allowing its residents to live, work, and attend school in the United States in exchange for the US military having access to the land, air, and sea of the three Pacific island<\/a> nations. While Palau's Cofa program is scheduled to expire in September, that of the Marshall Islands and Micronesia expired on September 30. Last year, new agreements were established and extended, and Biden promised the three nations US$7.1 billion<\/a> spread over 20 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

The notion that AIPAC represents the opinions of American Jews in general gives it a great deal of credibility and strength. However, Jews have never been a homogenous group, and in the aftermath of Israel's relentless attack on Gaza, an increasing number of Jewish Americans are voicing their support for other political ideologies. An excellent illustration of this is the open letter that follows. Prominent Jews from all backgrounds have signed it, publicly rejecting AIPAC's unwavering support of the Israeli government and its efforts to stifle the Democratic Party's emerging push for a different stance on Israel and Palestine. Leading Jewish Americans from many backgrounds have united to protest the unprecedented and detrimental influence of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and its affiliated organizations in US elections, especially in the Democratic Party primary. Rabbi Alissa Wise, the chief organizer of Rabbis for Ceasefire; philanthropist Ben Cohen, the co-founder of Ben & Jerry's; Beth Miller, the political director of Jewish Voice for Peace; Elliott Gould; Peter Beinart, the author and journalism professor of Jewish Currents; and journalist and author Suzanne Gordon are among those who have signed the letter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Letter of opposition<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The American Israel Public Affairs Committee's role in this year's US elections was sent by dozens of Jewish Americans. Aipac is an essential link in the chain that holds in place the unbearable tragedy of Israel\/Palestine, given that Israel is so isolated internationally that it could not continue its inhumane treatment of the Palestinians without US political and military support,\" This election year, Aipac, a significant US lobbying group that supports pro-Israel policies in Washington, has been using its clout to counter progressive Democrats who support a ceasefire. Jewish scholars, activists, corporate executives, and celebrities including Wallace Shawn, who starred in the Princess Bride, and Tony Kushner, a playwright and author have signed the petition. Aipac is anticipated to spend $100 million<\/a> in 2024 \"taking aim at candidates they deem insufficiently supportive of Israel,\" according to US media reports citing persons knowledgeable with the situation. The pro-Israel group has mostly targeted \"The Squad,\" a small group of Democratic members of the House of Representatives that includes Cori Bush and Rashida Tlaib. Members of the squad have been among the most ardent supporters in Washington of ending the Israel-Gaza conflict and stopping the growth of illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Reactions and responses<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The majority of Jewish Americans want more impartial policies, especially democratic ones, both domestically and regionally, according to Sharon Goldtvik, a political and communications consultant for progressive organizations. Eighty-nine percent of Jewish Americans believe that Israel has good justification to go to war with Hamas, and sixty-two percent think that Israel is conducting the conflict in Gaza in an appropriate manner. The letter was also signed by representatives of J Street, a Jewish-American organization that is \"pro-Israel, pro-peace\" and has frequently disagreed with Aipac. The signatories draw attention to the fact that AIPAC recently endorsed radical Republicans and that some members of Congress voted against recognizing President Joe Biden's win over Donald Trump in the 2021\u20132022 election cycle. It is also pointed out that the network of AIPAC received millions of dollars in donations from Trump supporters and used that money to support progressive candidates in Democratic primaries, mostly those who belong to racial and ethnic minorities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, The opinions of many Jewish Americans on AIPAC and its impact in US politics, particularly within the Democratic Party, have significantly changed as a result of this open letter. The discussion about US-Israel ties and AIPAC's influence on US foreign policy is expected to heat up as the 2024 elections draw near. <\/p>\n","post_title":"Jewish leaders oppose AIPAC's role in US elections","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"jewish-leaders-oppose-aipacs-role-in-us-elections","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6926","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6916,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-16 18:43:24","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-16 18:43:24","post_content":"\n

A measure that would force the popular video app TikTok to be banned nationally if its Chinese owner does not sell its shares was passed by the House. The MPs took action because they believed that the company's present ownership structure posed a threat to national security. After passing by a vote of 352-65<\/a>, the bill now moves on to the Senate, where its future is uncertain. With over 170 million users in the United States, TikTok is a fully-owned subsidiary of ByteDance Ltd., a Chinese technology company.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Legal and regulatory hurdles<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The congressmen claim that ByteDance is under the control of the Chinese government, which has the right to request access at any time to the data of TikTok users in the United States. The source of the concern is a series of national security legislation in China that require firms to cooperate with intelligence collection. The main conflict in Washington right now isn't between Joe Biden and Donald Trump. Politicians who wish to prohibit TikTok or compel its sale are at odds with those who wish to keep the well-known social media site unaltered. This problem in Washington, unlike most others, does not fall neatly into the Republican or Democratic camps. Trump chose to fight. During his presidency, he attempted to convince ByteDance Ltd., the company's Beijing-based owner of TikTok, to sell the business or risk a nationwide ban by using national security as a pretext. \"He perceived it as a means of penalizing China for the Covid-19 outbreak,\" states Stephen Myrow, the managing partner of Beacon Policy Advisors, a research organization that monitors the problem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Legal battles and court injunctions<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Bipartisan support for a ban in a key House committee vote last week set the process in motion. TikTok launched a ferocious lobbying effort, encouraging its video makers to contact their congressional representatives through push alerts. Most of it backfired. TikTok was accused by the Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party of \"lying to its users and using them to lobby Congress to benefit a foreign adversary.\" The committee was co-authored by Representatives Raja Krishnamoorthi, an Illinois Democrat, and Mike Gallagher, a Republican from Wisconsin. Nothing in Washington, including the TikTok ban, is ever as straightforward or obvious as it first appears. First, a group of legislators from both parties oppose it. Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, a libertarian Republican who opposes government intervention in business, particularly with Chinese-owned social media companies, finds it offensive. Many liberals, including the inventor herself, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, dislike it as well because they believe it would restrict the freedom of speech of youth and because they are wary of the China hawks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Global impact of a TikTok ban<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump had a meeting with Jeff Yass, the millionaire co-founder of Susquehanna International Group, a company that owns 15% of ByteDance and a significant Republican donor. Trump had changed his tune by Monday. During a phone interview with CNBC, he stated, \"A lot of people love TikTok.\" \"Many young children on TikTok will go insane without it.\" Ironically, the number of lawmakers seeking to put a ban on TikTok with conflicting agendas and large egos may be the largest hurdle to such a measure. While several senators have already begun to voice their disapproval of the House approach, no counterpart bill has been introduced in the Senate. It is anticipated that Senator Maria Cantwell, a Democrat from Washington, would eventually lead the charge on a TikTok law. Easter break is coming up soon. The legislative procedure is going to take longer. Politicians from both parties are also concerned about upsetting young people by interfering with their preferred app, especially with elections coming up.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Public opinion and political dynamics<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

While there is pressure for a TikTok ban, a forced divestment may be more plausible. Or the altercation can go like a well-known Washington narrative: a major altercation, loud headlines, and then nothing. TikTok is like dry tinder waiting to catch fire every time it comes up. However, it always fizzles out, and it will most likely do so once more in this instance. The issue is that it's hard to get an agreement on a single issue when everyone has a plan. There is a more localized worry, even if politicians will undoubtedly consider the business and international policy ramifications of outlawing TikTok. It's become commonplace to call an election after the hottest platform of the day since politicians use social media every election cycle to try to win over young people.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion,  One may make a compelling argument for the TikTok Election 2024. Every month, almost 170 million Americans use the app. About one-third of US individuals under 30 and roughly 43% of TikTok users say they routinely obtain their news from the platform, which is twice as many as three years ago, according to the Pew Research Center.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Slow roll: The uncertain fate of a TikTok ban","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"slow-roll-the-uncertain-fate-of-a-tiktok-ban","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6916","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6913,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-13 18:13:25","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-13 18:13:25","post_content":"\n

Legislators seeking to increase scrutiny are prompting lobbying companies in Washington to quickly withdraw their clients from China. The drive follows rising worries about China's influence and a recent spike in Chinese lobbying. The goal of legislators is to stop the People's Liberation Army (PLA) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)<\/a> from surreptitiously advancing agendas that undermine the interests of the American people by using legal loopholes. Senator John Cornyn, a Republican, told VOA's Mandarin Service that senators are almost done working on legislation that attempts to solve the issue. Members of the House have filed a bill to expose the exposing Foreign Influence in Lobbying Act, which was approved by the Senate last year. Cornyn co-sponsored the Senate legislation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The evolving landscape of US-China relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

\"Although there has been some opposition, we will keep working because it's critical to know who is genuinely influencing these legislators,\" Cornyn stated. Ensuring that individuals register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act has been the main priority. As you are aware, there have been several issues raised by persons failing to declare their lobbying agreements with foreign governments. Legislators are attempting to enact legislation that would close loopholes in the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 (LDA) and the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938 (FARA) in order to require greater transparency regarding foreign governments and political parties that engage in the organization, management, control, or supervision of lobbying efforts, whether or not they have received financial contributions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Scrutiny intensifies on lobbying practices<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

According to Cornyn, China presents a special difficulty. He remarked, \"The Chinese are unique in that they are forced to share information with the PLA and with their intelligence agencies; they do not have a true solely private sector.\" Thus, I would suggest that there should always be care when working with Chinese-owned businesses. The LDA, which mandates disclosure of domestic lobbying, and the FARA, which mandates disclosure of lobbying and other kinds of influence by foreign governments and political parties, control lobbying in the United States. But in 1995, FARA was changed to exclude people or firms representing foreigners if their activity isn't meant to help a foreign government or political party. Lobbyists consequently registered under the far less transparent LDA, which led to a sharp decline in FARA registrations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbyists navigate complex legal and ethical terrain<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The U.S. Department of Defense released the 1260H list, a list of \"Chinese military companies\" that operate directly or indirectly in the United States, in late January. This move prompted efforts to increase the inspection of China's lobbying operations. After that, lawmakers said that they were thinking of passing a bill that would make it illegal for lobbyists representing businesses on the list to meet with members of Congress, not even to address issues on behalf of their American clients. A chart that listed several Chinese enterprises, including some military firms, along with the names of their lobbying firms and whether or not they were included on the 1260H list started to circulate on Capitol Hill after the 1260H list was released. According to Robert Sutter, a professor of international affairs practice at George Washington University's Elliott School, Chinese military organizations' lobbying operations have traditionally been vague, and enforcement has been lax.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rising concerns over reputation and risk<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

As of late February, at least five American lobbying companies had lost Chinese business. Steptoe LLP and BGI, a Shenzhen biotech company, have ended their business relationship. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld ended its partnership with Xiaomi, a Chinese electronics business not on the 1260H list, and filed cease-and-desist filings to halt advocating for Hesai Group, a Chinese manufacturer of LiDARs. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Additionally, the Vogel Group has ceased lobbying on behalf of Complete Genomics, a division of BGI, a genetic technology business, and DJI, a Chinese drone manufacturer. Hesai and DJI are both included in the 1260H list. While its former parent firm, BGI, is on the list, Complete Genomics is not. While it is challenging to enact legislation that forbids Congressmen from meeting with anybody, Republican Senator Marco Rubio told VOA that certain congressional offices have made the decision to forgo meetings with lobbying firms that represent Chinese defense businesses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Chinese business lobbying in Washington was virtually nonexistent until a few years ago, according to Craig Singleton, a senior researcher at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, but that all changed when the US government started pursuing Huawei. According to Singleton, there is room for improvement in the Department of Justice's involvement in limiting the CCP's negative lobbying effect on Capitol Hill. The Department of Justice is in charge of implementing and upholding FARA.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US lobbyists reevaluate ties: Shedding Chinese clients amid heightened oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-lobbyists-reevaluate-ties-shedding-chinese-clients-amid-heightened-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6913","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6902,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_content":"\n

After an Alabama judge deemed frozen embryos to be children, Democrats attempted in vain to ram legislation through the U.S. Senate that would have guaranteed Americans' access to IVF and other assisted reproductive technologies. At least three Alabama IVF clinics stopped doing IVF, which combines eggs and sperm in a lab dish for infertile couples, after the state Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos should be treated like children. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Challenges in the courtroom<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Because nonviable embryos are occasionally discarded or utilized for research, the Alabama court's decision has sparked worries that anyone participating in IVF may be prosecuted, and that it may also inspire other states to take similar legal action. Sen. Tammy Duckworth<\/a>, a Democrat and veteran of the Iraq War who was seriously injured in battle in 2004; she requested that the Senate take up her \"Access to Family Building Act\" legislation right now. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Alabama Supreme Court's decision last month that frozen embryos were lawfully regarded infants sparked fresh requests for federal safeguards for reproductive therapies, which led to the IVF business CooperSurgical filing. The decision, which caused some clinics in Alabama to stop IVF procedures, has set up a nationwide IVF firestorm. As the election draws near, Democrats are hammering Republicans on the matter, while the GOP is rushing to take positions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbying in Washington<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Thorn Run Partners, a Washington-based company licensed to effectively advocate on \"Fertility\" and \"Maternal Health,\" was engaged by CooperSurgical. This week, lawmakers in Alabama's Republican-controlled legislature passed a bill to safeguard IVF procedures. However, conservatives swiftly prevented the Senate from adopting the first federal policy. The Alabama Wrongful Death of a Minor Act made the destruction of embryos illegal, according to the court's ruling in that state's case. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Families alleging CooperSurgical caused the loss of their embryos are suing the corporation for undisclosed damages in many jurisdictions over identical allegations. CooperSurgical representative Adeena Fried responded, \"The company wanted to see that IVF remains accessible nationwide,\" when questioned about the choice to lobby. \"Our goal is to guarantee that the greatest goods and innovations can be utilized in Alabama and throughout the country to strengthen families and welcome new members into the world,\" the spokesperson stated. \"As of right now, a lot of clinics in Alabama are closed, and legislation nationwide needs to support the entire fertility industry.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The role of lobbying in reproductive technology<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In a similar vein, GenBioPro, a different reproductive health care firm, which manufactures mifepristone generically, approached Washington following a siege of their product. In 2022, a lobbying firm filed to represent the company, and the following year, GenBioPro filed a lawsuit against the FDA to maintain the drug's availability. CooperSurgical, a Connecticut-based corporation, recruited three seasoned Hill staffers, one of which was Jessie Brairton, a former Eli Lilly lobbyist and staff member of Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas). The other two lobbyists are Jacky Usyk, a veteran Democratic Senate assistant, and Andrew Rosenberg, a former aide to Sen. Ed Kennedy (D-Mass.), who co-founded the company. Federal filings state that CooperSurgical has not previously registered to lobby. Beasley met with Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra on Tuesday to talk about the turmoil and uncertainty caused by the Alabama Supreme Court decision that threatens IVF, as well as other individuals impacted by the decision. It caused many people's reproductive treatments to come to an abrupt halt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Balancing profit and patient welfare<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Every woman present at the discussion discussed the intense psychological stress and loneliness associated with receiving reproductive therapy. The epidemic had already caused some of them to have their reproductive treatments interrupted, only for the Supreme Court's ruling to throw them off course once again. According to fertility patient and nurse practitioner Kendall Diebold, \"the IVF world as a whole is so isolating and lonely.\" \"And all of that has really been taken by this, and it has just been magnified and filled with sadness, grief, and anger.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Internal medicine specialist Dr. Rachel Charles, who also has lupus, talked about the rigorous treatment plan she had to follow in order to do IVF and get ready for an embryo transfer. Rather than move on with an embryo transfer, she made the decision in February to take a break from the daily hormone injections. In a previous interview, Rebecca Mathews, 36, who is the mother of two IVF-conceived children, told The 19th that she was shocked and angry at the same time when she learned of the decision. She still has a frozen embryo and is unsure of what to do with it.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating legal turmoil: IVF company registers to lobby Washington","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-legal-turmoil-ivf-company-registers-to-lobby-washington","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6902","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6871,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_date_gmt":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_content":"\n

The Biden administration<\/a> remained dedicated to its alliances in the strategically significant Indo-Pacific area, one day after a US$95 billion <\/a>foreign assistance package omitted economic help pledged for the region as the US strives to counter China's influence there. We at the White House<\/a> and State Department are still in favor of funding authorization and appropriation. Deputy assistant secretary Camille Dawson of the US State Department stated, \"We feel it's critically important to continue working in close concert and in support of the freely associated states<\/a>,\" referring to the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau. Dawson said this in answer to a query from the Post at a press conference on the second anniversary of US President Joe Biden's Indo-Pacific Strategy announcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Navigating a Strategic Landscape<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The agreement is viewed as critical to Washington's efforts to sustain<\/a> its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken once declared that \"our planet's future will be written,\" despite growing concerns<\/a> about what some have called Beijing's coercive influence campaign.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That tactic may have its roots in the Compact of Free Association (Cofa), an agreement<\/a> that has guided US relations with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau for many years. First signed in 1986, the Cofa accord provides financial help and a legal framework<\/a> allowing its residents to live, work, and attend school in the United States in exchange for the US military having access to the land, air, and sea of the three Pacific island<\/a> nations. While Palau's Cofa program is scheduled to expire in September, that of the Marshall Islands and Micronesia expired on September 30. Last year, new agreements were established and extended, and Biden promised the three nations US$7.1 billion<\/a> spread over 20 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

The significance of AIPAC<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The notion that AIPAC represents the opinions of American Jews in general gives it a great deal of credibility and strength. However, Jews have never been a homogenous group, and in the aftermath of Israel's relentless attack on Gaza, an increasing number of Jewish Americans are voicing their support for other political ideologies. An excellent illustration of this is the open letter that follows. Prominent Jews from all backgrounds have signed it, publicly rejecting AIPAC's unwavering support of the Israeli government and its efforts to stifle the Democratic Party's emerging push for a different stance on Israel and Palestine. Leading Jewish Americans from many backgrounds have united to protest the unprecedented and detrimental influence of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and its affiliated organizations in US elections, especially in the Democratic Party primary. Rabbi Alissa Wise, the chief organizer of Rabbis for Ceasefire; philanthropist Ben Cohen, the co-founder of Ben & Jerry's; Beth Miller, the political director of Jewish Voice for Peace; Elliott Gould; Peter Beinart, the author and journalism professor of Jewish Currents; and journalist and author Suzanne Gordon are among those who have signed the letter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Letter of opposition<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The American Israel Public Affairs Committee's role in this year's US elections was sent by dozens of Jewish Americans. Aipac is an essential link in the chain that holds in place the unbearable tragedy of Israel\/Palestine, given that Israel is so isolated internationally that it could not continue its inhumane treatment of the Palestinians without US political and military support,\" This election year, Aipac, a significant US lobbying group that supports pro-Israel policies in Washington, has been using its clout to counter progressive Democrats who support a ceasefire. Jewish scholars, activists, corporate executives, and celebrities including Wallace Shawn, who starred in the Princess Bride, and Tony Kushner, a playwright and author have signed the petition. Aipac is anticipated to spend $100 million<\/a> in 2024 \"taking aim at candidates they deem insufficiently supportive of Israel,\" according to US media reports citing persons knowledgeable with the situation. The pro-Israel group has mostly targeted \"The Squad,\" a small group of Democratic members of the House of Representatives that includes Cori Bush and Rashida Tlaib. Members of the squad have been among the most ardent supporters in Washington of ending the Israel-Gaza conflict and stopping the growth of illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Reactions and responses<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The majority of Jewish Americans want more impartial policies, especially democratic ones, both domestically and regionally, according to Sharon Goldtvik, a political and communications consultant for progressive organizations. Eighty-nine percent of Jewish Americans believe that Israel has good justification to go to war with Hamas, and sixty-two percent think that Israel is conducting the conflict in Gaza in an appropriate manner. The letter was also signed by representatives of J Street, a Jewish-American organization that is \"pro-Israel, pro-peace\" and has frequently disagreed with Aipac. The signatories draw attention to the fact that AIPAC recently endorsed radical Republicans and that some members of Congress voted against recognizing President Joe Biden's win over Donald Trump in the 2021\u20132022 election cycle. It is also pointed out that the network of AIPAC received millions of dollars in donations from Trump supporters and used that money to support progressive candidates in Democratic primaries, mostly those who belong to racial and ethnic minorities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, The opinions of many Jewish Americans on AIPAC and its impact in US politics, particularly within the Democratic Party, have significantly changed as a result of this open letter. The discussion about US-Israel ties and AIPAC's influence on US foreign policy is expected to heat up as the 2024 elections draw near. <\/p>\n","post_title":"Jewish leaders oppose AIPAC's role in US elections","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"jewish-leaders-oppose-aipacs-role-in-us-elections","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6926","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6916,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-16 18:43:24","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-16 18:43:24","post_content":"\n

A measure that would force the popular video app TikTok to be banned nationally if its Chinese owner does not sell its shares was passed by the House. The MPs took action because they believed that the company's present ownership structure posed a threat to national security. After passing by a vote of 352-65<\/a>, the bill now moves on to the Senate, where its future is uncertain. With over 170 million users in the United States, TikTok is a fully-owned subsidiary of ByteDance Ltd., a Chinese technology company.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Legal and regulatory hurdles<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The congressmen claim that ByteDance is under the control of the Chinese government, which has the right to request access at any time to the data of TikTok users in the United States. The source of the concern is a series of national security legislation in China that require firms to cooperate with intelligence collection. The main conflict in Washington right now isn't between Joe Biden and Donald Trump. Politicians who wish to prohibit TikTok or compel its sale are at odds with those who wish to keep the well-known social media site unaltered. This problem in Washington, unlike most others, does not fall neatly into the Republican or Democratic camps. Trump chose to fight. During his presidency, he attempted to convince ByteDance Ltd., the company's Beijing-based owner of TikTok, to sell the business or risk a nationwide ban by using national security as a pretext. \"He perceived it as a means of penalizing China for the Covid-19 outbreak,\" states Stephen Myrow, the managing partner of Beacon Policy Advisors, a research organization that monitors the problem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Legal battles and court injunctions<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Bipartisan support for a ban in a key House committee vote last week set the process in motion. TikTok launched a ferocious lobbying effort, encouraging its video makers to contact their congressional representatives through push alerts. Most of it backfired. TikTok was accused by the Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party of \"lying to its users and using them to lobby Congress to benefit a foreign adversary.\" The committee was co-authored by Representatives Raja Krishnamoorthi, an Illinois Democrat, and Mike Gallagher, a Republican from Wisconsin. Nothing in Washington, including the TikTok ban, is ever as straightforward or obvious as it first appears. First, a group of legislators from both parties oppose it. Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, a libertarian Republican who opposes government intervention in business, particularly with Chinese-owned social media companies, finds it offensive. Many liberals, including the inventor herself, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, dislike it as well because they believe it would restrict the freedom of speech of youth and because they are wary of the China hawks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Global impact of a TikTok ban<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump had a meeting with Jeff Yass, the millionaire co-founder of Susquehanna International Group, a company that owns 15% of ByteDance and a significant Republican donor. Trump had changed his tune by Monday. During a phone interview with CNBC, he stated, \"A lot of people love TikTok.\" \"Many young children on TikTok will go insane without it.\" Ironically, the number of lawmakers seeking to put a ban on TikTok with conflicting agendas and large egos may be the largest hurdle to such a measure. While several senators have already begun to voice their disapproval of the House approach, no counterpart bill has been introduced in the Senate. It is anticipated that Senator Maria Cantwell, a Democrat from Washington, would eventually lead the charge on a TikTok law. Easter break is coming up soon. The legislative procedure is going to take longer. Politicians from both parties are also concerned about upsetting young people by interfering with their preferred app, especially with elections coming up.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Public opinion and political dynamics<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

While there is pressure for a TikTok ban, a forced divestment may be more plausible. Or the altercation can go like a well-known Washington narrative: a major altercation, loud headlines, and then nothing. TikTok is like dry tinder waiting to catch fire every time it comes up. However, it always fizzles out, and it will most likely do so once more in this instance. The issue is that it's hard to get an agreement on a single issue when everyone has a plan. There is a more localized worry, even if politicians will undoubtedly consider the business and international policy ramifications of outlawing TikTok. It's become commonplace to call an election after the hottest platform of the day since politicians use social media every election cycle to try to win over young people.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion,  One may make a compelling argument for the TikTok Election 2024. Every month, almost 170 million Americans use the app. About one-third of US individuals under 30 and roughly 43% of TikTok users say they routinely obtain their news from the platform, which is twice as many as three years ago, according to the Pew Research Center.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Slow roll: The uncertain fate of a TikTok ban","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"slow-roll-the-uncertain-fate-of-a-tiktok-ban","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6916","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6913,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-13 18:13:25","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-13 18:13:25","post_content":"\n

Legislators seeking to increase scrutiny are prompting lobbying companies in Washington to quickly withdraw their clients from China. The drive follows rising worries about China's influence and a recent spike in Chinese lobbying. The goal of legislators is to stop the People's Liberation Army (PLA) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)<\/a> from surreptitiously advancing agendas that undermine the interests of the American people by using legal loopholes. Senator John Cornyn, a Republican, told VOA's Mandarin Service that senators are almost done working on legislation that attempts to solve the issue. Members of the House have filed a bill to expose the exposing Foreign Influence in Lobbying Act, which was approved by the Senate last year. Cornyn co-sponsored the Senate legislation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The evolving landscape of US-China relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

\"Although there has been some opposition, we will keep working because it's critical to know who is genuinely influencing these legislators,\" Cornyn stated. Ensuring that individuals register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act has been the main priority. As you are aware, there have been several issues raised by persons failing to declare their lobbying agreements with foreign governments. Legislators are attempting to enact legislation that would close loopholes in the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 (LDA) and the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938 (FARA) in order to require greater transparency regarding foreign governments and political parties that engage in the organization, management, control, or supervision of lobbying efforts, whether or not they have received financial contributions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Scrutiny intensifies on lobbying practices<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

According to Cornyn, China presents a special difficulty. He remarked, \"The Chinese are unique in that they are forced to share information with the PLA and with their intelligence agencies; they do not have a true solely private sector.\" Thus, I would suggest that there should always be care when working with Chinese-owned businesses. The LDA, which mandates disclosure of domestic lobbying, and the FARA, which mandates disclosure of lobbying and other kinds of influence by foreign governments and political parties, control lobbying in the United States. But in 1995, FARA was changed to exclude people or firms representing foreigners if their activity isn't meant to help a foreign government or political party. Lobbyists consequently registered under the far less transparent LDA, which led to a sharp decline in FARA registrations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbyists navigate complex legal and ethical terrain<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The U.S. Department of Defense released the 1260H list, a list of \"Chinese military companies\" that operate directly or indirectly in the United States, in late January. This move prompted efforts to increase the inspection of China's lobbying operations. After that, lawmakers said that they were thinking of passing a bill that would make it illegal for lobbyists representing businesses on the list to meet with members of Congress, not even to address issues on behalf of their American clients. A chart that listed several Chinese enterprises, including some military firms, along with the names of their lobbying firms and whether or not they were included on the 1260H list started to circulate on Capitol Hill after the 1260H list was released. According to Robert Sutter, a professor of international affairs practice at George Washington University's Elliott School, Chinese military organizations' lobbying operations have traditionally been vague, and enforcement has been lax.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rising concerns over reputation and risk<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

As of late February, at least five American lobbying companies had lost Chinese business. Steptoe LLP and BGI, a Shenzhen biotech company, have ended their business relationship. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld ended its partnership with Xiaomi, a Chinese electronics business not on the 1260H list, and filed cease-and-desist filings to halt advocating for Hesai Group, a Chinese manufacturer of LiDARs. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Additionally, the Vogel Group has ceased lobbying on behalf of Complete Genomics, a division of BGI, a genetic technology business, and DJI, a Chinese drone manufacturer. Hesai and DJI are both included in the 1260H list. While its former parent firm, BGI, is on the list, Complete Genomics is not. While it is challenging to enact legislation that forbids Congressmen from meeting with anybody, Republican Senator Marco Rubio told VOA that certain congressional offices have made the decision to forgo meetings with lobbying firms that represent Chinese defense businesses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Chinese business lobbying in Washington was virtually nonexistent until a few years ago, according to Craig Singleton, a senior researcher at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, but that all changed when the US government started pursuing Huawei. According to Singleton, there is room for improvement in the Department of Justice's involvement in limiting the CCP's negative lobbying effect on Capitol Hill. The Department of Justice is in charge of implementing and upholding FARA.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US lobbyists reevaluate ties: Shedding Chinese clients amid heightened oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-lobbyists-reevaluate-ties-shedding-chinese-clients-amid-heightened-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6913","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6902,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_content":"\n

After an Alabama judge deemed frozen embryos to be children, Democrats attempted in vain to ram legislation through the U.S. Senate that would have guaranteed Americans' access to IVF and other assisted reproductive technologies. At least three Alabama IVF clinics stopped doing IVF, which combines eggs and sperm in a lab dish for infertile couples, after the state Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos should be treated like children. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Challenges in the courtroom<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Because nonviable embryos are occasionally discarded or utilized for research, the Alabama court's decision has sparked worries that anyone participating in IVF may be prosecuted, and that it may also inspire other states to take similar legal action. Sen. Tammy Duckworth<\/a>, a Democrat and veteran of the Iraq War who was seriously injured in battle in 2004; she requested that the Senate take up her \"Access to Family Building Act\" legislation right now. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Alabama Supreme Court's decision last month that frozen embryos were lawfully regarded infants sparked fresh requests for federal safeguards for reproductive therapies, which led to the IVF business CooperSurgical filing. The decision, which caused some clinics in Alabama to stop IVF procedures, has set up a nationwide IVF firestorm. As the election draws near, Democrats are hammering Republicans on the matter, while the GOP is rushing to take positions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbying in Washington<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Thorn Run Partners, a Washington-based company licensed to effectively advocate on \"Fertility\" and \"Maternal Health,\" was engaged by CooperSurgical. This week, lawmakers in Alabama's Republican-controlled legislature passed a bill to safeguard IVF procedures. However, conservatives swiftly prevented the Senate from adopting the first federal policy. The Alabama Wrongful Death of a Minor Act made the destruction of embryos illegal, according to the court's ruling in that state's case. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Families alleging CooperSurgical caused the loss of their embryos are suing the corporation for undisclosed damages in many jurisdictions over identical allegations. CooperSurgical representative Adeena Fried responded, \"The company wanted to see that IVF remains accessible nationwide,\" when questioned about the choice to lobby. \"Our goal is to guarantee that the greatest goods and innovations can be utilized in Alabama and throughout the country to strengthen families and welcome new members into the world,\" the spokesperson stated. \"As of right now, a lot of clinics in Alabama are closed, and legislation nationwide needs to support the entire fertility industry.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The role of lobbying in reproductive technology<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In a similar vein, GenBioPro, a different reproductive health care firm, which manufactures mifepristone generically, approached Washington following a siege of their product. In 2022, a lobbying firm filed to represent the company, and the following year, GenBioPro filed a lawsuit against the FDA to maintain the drug's availability. CooperSurgical, a Connecticut-based corporation, recruited three seasoned Hill staffers, one of which was Jessie Brairton, a former Eli Lilly lobbyist and staff member of Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas). The other two lobbyists are Jacky Usyk, a veteran Democratic Senate assistant, and Andrew Rosenberg, a former aide to Sen. Ed Kennedy (D-Mass.), who co-founded the company. Federal filings state that CooperSurgical has not previously registered to lobby. Beasley met with Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra on Tuesday to talk about the turmoil and uncertainty caused by the Alabama Supreme Court decision that threatens IVF, as well as other individuals impacted by the decision. It caused many people's reproductive treatments to come to an abrupt halt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Balancing profit and patient welfare<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Every woman present at the discussion discussed the intense psychological stress and loneliness associated with receiving reproductive therapy. The epidemic had already caused some of them to have their reproductive treatments interrupted, only for the Supreme Court's ruling to throw them off course once again. According to fertility patient and nurse practitioner Kendall Diebold, \"the IVF world as a whole is so isolating and lonely.\" \"And all of that has really been taken by this, and it has just been magnified and filled with sadness, grief, and anger.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Internal medicine specialist Dr. Rachel Charles, who also has lupus, talked about the rigorous treatment plan she had to follow in order to do IVF and get ready for an embryo transfer. Rather than move on with an embryo transfer, she made the decision in February to take a break from the daily hormone injections. In a previous interview, Rebecca Mathews, 36, who is the mother of two IVF-conceived children, told The 19th that she was shocked and angry at the same time when she learned of the decision. She still has a frozen embryo and is unsure of what to do with it.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating legal turmoil: IVF company registers to lobby Washington","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-legal-turmoil-ivf-company-registers-to-lobby-washington","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6902","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6871,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_date_gmt":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_content":"\n

The Biden administration<\/a> remained dedicated to its alliances in the strategically significant Indo-Pacific area, one day after a US$95 billion <\/a>foreign assistance package omitted economic help pledged for the region as the US strives to counter China's influence there. We at the White House<\/a> and State Department are still in favor of funding authorization and appropriation. Deputy assistant secretary Camille Dawson of the US State Department stated, \"We feel it's critically important to continue working in close concert and in support of the freely associated states<\/a>,\" referring to the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau. Dawson said this in answer to a query from the Post at a press conference on the second anniversary of US President Joe Biden's Indo-Pacific Strategy announcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Navigating a Strategic Landscape<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The agreement is viewed as critical to Washington's efforts to sustain<\/a> its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken once declared that \"our planet's future will be written,\" despite growing concerns<\/a> about what some have called Beijing's coercive influence campaign.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That tactic may have its roots in the Compact of Free Association (Cofa), an agreement<\/a> that has guided US relations with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau for many years. First signed in 1986, the Cofa accord provides financial help and a legal framework<\/a> allowing its residents to live, work, and attend school in the United States in exchange for the US military having access to the land, air, and sea of the three Pacific island<\/a> nations. While Palau's Cofa program is scheduled to expire in September, that of the Marshall Islands and Micronesia expired on September 30. Last year, new agreements were established and extended, and Biden promised the three nations US$7.1 billion<\/a> spread over 20 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

\n

The most influential arm of the American Israel lobby has been the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, or AIPAC, for many years. Up until recently, lawmakers from both major political parties mostly supported it. However, in recent years, the Democratic Party's views on Israel, Palestine, and AIPAC itself have started to drastically change, endangering AIPAC's ability to advocate. As a result, AIPAC started meddling heavily in Democratic primary contests and squandering enormous quantities of money to oust political rivals who would disagree with Israeli government policy. With promises to spend even more money in 2024, AIPAC recently claimed that it was \"dollar for dollar, the largest contributor to candidates in the 2022 midterm elections.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The significance of AIPAC<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The notion that AIPAC represents the opinions of American Jews in general gives it a great deal of credibility and strength. However, Jews have never been a homogenous group, and in the aftermath of Israel's relentless attack on Gaza, an increasing number of Jewish Americans are voicing their support for other political ideologies. An excellent illustration of this is the open letter that follows. Prominent Jews from all backgrounds have signed it, publicly rejecting AIPAC's unwavering support of the Israeli government and its efforts to stifle the Democratic Party's emerging push for a different stance on Israel and Palestine. Leading Jewish Americans from many backgrounds have united to protest the unprecedented and detrimental influence of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and its affiliated organizations in US elections, especially in the Democratic Party primary. Rabbi Alissa Wise, the chief organizer of Rabbis for Ceasefire; philanthropist Ben Cohen, the co-founder of Ben & Jerry's; Beth Miller, the political director of Jewish Voice for Peace; Elliott Gould; Peter Beinart, the author and journalism professor of Jewish Currents; and journalist and author Suzanne Gordon are among those who have signed the letter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Letter of opposition<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The American Israel Public Affairs Committee's role in this year's US elections was sent by dozens of Jewish Americans. Aipac is an essential link in the chain that holds in place the unbearable tragedy of Israel\/Palestine, given that Israel is so isolated internationally that it could not continue its inhumane treatment of the Palestinians without US political and military support,\" This election year, Aipac, a significant US lobbying group that supports pro-Israel policies in Washington, has been using its clout to counter progressive Democrats who support a ceasefire. Jewish scholars, activists, corporate executives, and celebrities including Wallace Shawn, who starred in the Princess Bride, and Tony Kushner, a playwright and author have signed the petition. Aipac is anticipated to spend $100 million<\/a> in 2024 \"taking aim at candidates they deem insufficiently supportive of Israel,\" according to US media reports citing persons knowledgeable with the situation. The pro-Israel group has mostly targeted \"The Squad,\" a small group of Democratic members of the House of Representatives that includes Cori Bush and Rashida Tlaib. Members of the squad have been among the most ardent supporters in Washington of ending the Israel-Gaza conflict and stopping the growth of illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Reactions and responses<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The majority of Jewish Americans want more impartial policies, especially democratic ones, both domestically and regionally, according to Sharon Goldtvik, a political and communications consultant for progressive organizations. Eighty-nine percent of Jewish Americans believe that Israel has good justification to go to war with Hamas, and sixty-two percent think that Israel is conducting the conflict in Gaza in an appropriate manner. The letter was also signed by representatives of J Street, a Jewish-American organization that is \"pro-Israel, pro-peace\" and has frequently disagreed with Aipac. The signatories draw attention to the fact that AIPAC recently endorsed radical Republicans and that some members of Congress voted against recognizing President Joe Biden's win over Donald Trump in the 2021\u20132022 election cycle. It is also pointed out that the network of AIPAC received millions of dollars in donations from Trump supporters and used that money to support progressive candidates in Democratic primaries, mostly those who belong to racial and ethnic minorities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, The opinions of many Jewish Americans on AIPAC and its impact in US politics, particularly within the Democratic Party, have significantly changed as a result of this open letter. The discussion about US-Israel ties and AIPAC's influence on US foreign policy is expected to heat up as the 2024 elections draw near. <\/p>\n","post_title":"Jewish leaders oppose AIPAC's role in US elections","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"jewish-leaders-oppose-aipacs-role-in-us-elections","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6926","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6916,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-16 18:43:24","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-16 18:43:24","post_content":"\n

A measure that would force the popular video app TikTok to be banned nationally if its Chinese owner does not sell its shares was passed by the House. The MPs took action because they believed that the company's present ownership structure posed a threat to national security. After passing by a vote of 352-65<\/a>, the bill now moves on to the Senate, where its future is uncertain. With over 170 million users in the United States, TikTok is a fully-owned subsidiary of ByteDance Ltd., a Chinese technology company.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Legal and regulatory hurdles<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The congressmen claim that ByteDance is under the control of the Chinese government, which has the right to request access at any time to the data of TikTok users in the United States. The source of the concern is a series of national security legislation in China that require firms to cooperate with intelligence collection. The main conflict in Washington right now isn't between Joe Biden and Donald Trump. Politicians who wish to prohibit TikTok or compel its sale are at odds with those who wish to keep the well-known social media site unaltered. This problem in Washington, unlike most others, does not fall neatly into the Republican or Democratic camps. Trump chose to fight. During his presidency, he attempted to convince ByteDance Ltd., the company's Beijing-based owner of TikTok, to sell the business or risk a nationwide ban by using national security as a pretext. \"He perceived it as a means of penalizing China for the Covid-19 outbreak,\" states Stephen Myrow, the managing partner of Beacon Policy Advisors, a research organization that monitors the problem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Legal battles and court injunctions<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Bipartisan support for a ban in a key House committee vote last week set the process in motion. TikTok launched a ferocious lobbying effort, encouraging its video makers to contact their congressional representatives through push alerts. Most of it backfired. TikTok was accused by the Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party of \"lying to its users and using them to lobby Congress to benefit a foreign adversary.\" The committee was co-authored by Representatives Raja Krishnamoorthi, an Illinois Democrat, and Mike Gallagher, a Republican from Wisconsin. Nothing in Washington, including the TikTok ban, is ever as straightforward or obvious as it first appears. First, a group of legislators from both parties oppose it. Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, a libertarian Republican who opposes government intervention in business, particularly with Chinese-owned social media companies, finds it offensive. Many liberals, including the inventor herself, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, dislike it as well because they believe it would restrict the freedom of speech of youth and because they are wary of the China hawks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Global impact of a TikTok ban<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump had a meeting with Jeff Yass, the millionaire co-founder of Susquehanna International Group, a company that owns 15% of ByteDance and a significant Republican donor. Trump had changed his tune by Monday. During a phone interview with CNBC, he stated, \"A lot of people love TikTok.\" \"Many young children on TikTok will go insane without it.\" Ironically, the number of lawmakers seeking to put a ban on TikTok with conflicting agendas and large egos may be the largest hurdle to such a measure. While several senators have already begun to voice their disapproval of the House approach, no counterpart bill has been introduced in the Senate. It is anticipated that Senator Maria Cantwell, a Democrat from Washington, would eventually lead the charge on a TikTok law. Easter break is coming up soon. The legislative procedure is going to take longer. Politicians from both parties are also concerned about upsetting young people by interfering with their preferred app, especially with elections coming up.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Public opinion and political dynamics<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

While there is pressure for a TikTok ban, a forced divestment may be more plausible. Or the altercation can go like a well-known Washington narrative: a major altercation, loud headlines, and then nothing. TikTok is like dry tinder waiting to catch fire every time it comes up. However, it always fizzles out, and it will most likely do so once more in this instance. The issue is that it's hard to get an agreement on a single issue when everyone has a plan. There is a more localized worry, even if politicians will undoubtedly consider the business and international policy ramifications of outlawing TikTok. It's become commonplace to call an election after the hottest platform of the day since politicians use social media every election cycle to try to win over young people.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion,  One may make a compelling argument for the TikTok Election 2024. Every month, almost 170 million Americans use the app. About one-third of US individuals under 30 and roughly 43% of TikTok users say they routinely obtain their news from the platform, which is twice as many as three years ago, according to the Pew Research Center.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Slow roll: The uncertain fate of a TikTok ban","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"slow-roll-the-uncertain-fate-of-a-tiktok-ban","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6916","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6913,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-13 18:13:25","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-13 18:13:25","post_content":"\n

Legislators seeking to increase scrutiny are prompting lobbying companies in Washington to quickly withdraw their clients from China. The drive follows rising worries about China's influence and a recent spike in Chinese lobbying. The goal of legislators is to stop the People's Liberation Army (PLA) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)<\/a> from surreptitiously advancing agendas that undermine the interests of the American people by using legal loopholes. Senator John Cornyn, a Republican, told VOA's Mandarin Service that senators are almost done working on legislation that attempts to solve the issue. Members of the House have filed a bill to expose the exposing Foreign Influence in Lobbying Act, which was approved by the Senate last year. Cornyn co-sponsored the Senate legislation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The evolving landscape of US-China relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

\"Although there has been some opposition, we will keep working because it's critical to know who is genuinely influencing these legislators,\" Cornyn stated. Ensuring that individuals register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act has been the main priority. As you are aware, there have been several issues raised by persons failing to declare their lobbying agreements with foreign governments. Legislators are attempting to enact legislation that would close loopholes in the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 (LDA) and the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938 (FARA) in order to require greater transparency regarding foreign governments and political parties that engage in the organization, management, control, or supervision of lobbying efforts, whether or not they have received financial contributions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Scrutiny intensifies on lobbying practices<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

According to Cornyn, China presents a special difficulty. He remarked, \"The Chinese are unique in that they are forced to share information with the PLA and with their intelligence agencies; they do not have a true solely private sector.\" Thus, I would suggest that there should always be care when working with Chinese-owned businesses. The LDA, which mandates disclosure of domestic lobbying, and the FARA, which mandates disclosure of lobbying and other kinds of influence by foreign governments and political parties, control lobbying in the United States. But in 1995, FARA was changed to exclude people or firms representing foreigners if their activity isn't meant to help a foreign government or political party. Lobbyists consequently registered under the far less transparent LDA, which led to a sharp decline in FARA registrations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbyists navigate complex legal and ethical terrain<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The U.S. Department of Defense released the 1260H list, a list of \"Chinese military companies\" that operate directly or indirectly in the United States, in late January. This move prompted efforts to increase the inspection of China's lobbying operations. After that, lawmakers said that they were thinking of passing a bill that would make it illegal for lobbyists representing businesses on the list to meet with members of Congress, not even to address issues on behalf of their American clients. A chart that listed several Chinese enterprises, including some military firms, along with the names of their lobbying firms and whether or not they were included on the 1260H list started to circulate on Capitol Hill after the 1260H list was released. According to Robert Sutter, a professor of international affairs practice at George Washington University's Elliott School, Chinese military organizations' lobbying operations have traditionally been vague, and enforcement has been lax.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rising concerns over reputation and risk<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

As of late February, at least five American lobbying companies had lost Chinese business. Steptoe LLP and BGI, a Shenzhen biotech company, have ended their business relationship. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld ended its partnership with Xiaomi, a Chinese electronics business not on the 1260H list, and filed cease-and-desist filings to halt advocating for Hesai Group, a Chinese manufacturer of LiDARs. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Additionally, the Vogel Group has ceased lobbying on behalf of Complete Genomics, a division of BGI, a genetic technology business, and DJI, a Chinese drone manufacturer. Hesai and DJI are both included in the 1260H list. While its former parent firm, BGI, is on the list, Complete Genomics is not. While it is challenging to enact legislation that forbids Congressmen from meeting with anybody, Republican Senator Marco Rubio told VOA that certain congressional offices have made the decision to forgo meetings with lobbying firms that represent Chinese defense businesses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Chinese business lobbying in Washington was virtually nonexistent until a few years ago, according to Craig Singleton, a senior researcher at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, but that all changed when the US government started pursuing Huawei. According to Singleton, there is room for improvement in the Department of Justice's involvement in limiting the CCP's negative lobbying effect on Capitol Hill. The Department of Justice is in charge of implementing and upholding FARA.<\/p>\n","post_title":"US lobbyists reevaluate ties: Shedding Chinese clients amid heightened oversight","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"us-lobbyists-reevaluate-ties-shedding-chinese-clients-amid-heightened-oversight","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6913","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6902,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_date_gmt":"2024-03-04 18:54:50","post_content":"\n

After an Alabama judge deemed frozen embryos to be children, Democrats attempted in vain to ram legislation through the U.S. Senate that would have guaranteed Americans' access to IVF and other assisted reproductive technologies. At least three Alabama IVF clinics stopped doing IVF, which combines eggs and sperm in a lab dish for infertile couples, after the state Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos should be treated like children. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Challenges in the courtroom<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Because nonviable embryos are occasionally discarded or utilized for research, the Alabama court's decision has sparked worries that anyone participating in IVF may be prosecuted, and that it may also inspire other states to take similar legal action. Sen. Tammy Duckworth<\/a>, a Democrat and veteran of the Iraq War who was seriously injured in battle in 2004; she requested that the Senate take up her \"Access to Family Building Act\" legislation right now. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Alabama Supreme Court's decision last month that frozen embryos were lawfully regarded infants sparked fresh requests for federal safeguards for reproductive therapies, which led to the IVF business CooperSurgical filing. The decision, which caused some clinics in Alabama to stop IVF procedures, has set up a nationwide IVF firestorm. As the election draws near, Democrats are hammering Republicans on the matter, while the GOP is rushing to take positions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lobbying in Washington<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Thorn Run Partners, a Washington-based company licensed to effectively advocate on \"Fertility\" and \"Maternal Health,\" was engaged by CooperSurgical. This week, lawmakers in Alabama's Republican-controlled legislature passed a bill to safeguard IVF procedures. However, conservatives swiftly prevented the Senate from adopting the first federal policy. The Alabama Wrongful Death of a Minor Act made the destruction of embryos illegal, according to the court's ruling in that state's case. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Families alleging CooperSurgical caused the loss of their embryos are suing the corporation for undisclosed damages in many jurisdictions over identical allegations. CooperSurgical representative Adeena Fried responded, \"The company wanted to see that IVF remains accessible nationwide,\" when questioned about the choice to lobby. \"Our goal is to guarantee that the greatest goods and innovations can be utilized in Alabama and throughout the country to strengthen families and welcome new members into the world,\" the spokesperson stated. \"As of right now, a lot of clinics in Alabama are closed, and legislation nationwide needs to support the entire fertility industry.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The role of lobbying in reproductive technology<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In a similar vein, GenBioPro, a different reproductive health care firm, which manufactures mifepristone generically, approached Washington following a siege of their product. In 2022, a lobbying firm filed to represent the company, and the following year, GenBioPro filed a lawsuit against the FDA to maintain the drug's availability. CooperSurgical, a Connecticut-based corporation, recruited three seasoned Hill staffers, one of which was Jessie Brairton, a former Eli Lilly lobbyist and staff member of Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas). The other two lobbyists are Jacky Usyk, a veteran Democratic Senate assistant, and Andrew Rosenberg, a former aide to Sen. Ed Kennedy (D-Mass.), who co-founded the company. Federal filings state that CooperSurgical has not previously registered to lobby. Beasley met with Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra on Tuesday to talk about the turmoil and uncertainty caused by the Alabama Supreme Court decision that threatens IVF, as well as other individuals impacted by the decision. It caused many people's reproductive treatments to come to an abrupt halt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Balancing profit and patient welfare<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Every woman present at the discussion discussed the intense psychological stress and loneliness associated with receiving reproductive therapy. The epidemic had already caused some of them to have their reproductive treatments interrupted, only for the Supreme Court's ruling to throw them off course once again. According to fertility patient and nurse practitioner Kendall Diebold, \"the IVF world as a whole is so isolating and lonely.\" \"And all of that has really been taken by this, and it has just been magnified and filled with sadness, grief, and anger.\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Internal medicine specialist Dr. Rachel Charles, who also has lupus, talked about the rigorous treatment plan she had to follow in order to do IVF and get ready for an embryo transfer. Rather than move on with an embryo transfer, she made the decision in February to take a break from the daily hormone injections. In a previous interview, Rebecca Mathews, 36, who is the mother of two IVF-conceived children, told The 19th that she was shocked and angry at the same time when she learned of the decision. She still has a frozen embryo and is unsure of what to do with it.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating legal turmoil: IVF company registers to lobby Washington","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-legal-turmoil-ivf-company-registers-to-lobby-washington","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6902","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":6871,"post_author":"7","post_date":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_date_gmt":"2024-02-17 17:32:08","post_content":"\n

The Biden administration<\/a> remained dedicated to its alliances in the strategically significant Indo-Pacific area, one day after a US$95 billion <\/a>foreign assistance package omitted economic help pledged for the region as the US strives to counter China's influence there. We at the White House<\/a> and State Department are still in favor of funding authorization and appropriation. Deputy assistant secretary Camille Dawson of the US State Department stated, \"We feel it's critically important to continue working in close concert and in support of the freely associated states<\/a>,\" referring to the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau. Dawson said this in answer to a query from the Post at a press conference on the second anniversary of US President Joe Biden's Indo-Pacific Strategy announcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Navigating a Strategic Landscape<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The agreement is viewed as critical to Washington's efforts to sustain<\/a> its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken once declared that \"our planet's future will be written,\" despite growing concerns<\/a> about what some have called Beijing's coercive influence campaign.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That tactic may have its roots in the Compact of Free Association (Cofa), an agreement<\/a> that has guided US relations with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau for many years. First signed in 1986, the Cofa accord provides financial help and a legal framework<\/a> allowing its residents to live, work, and attend school in the United States in exchange for the US military having access to the land, air, and sea of the three Pacific island<\/a> nations. While Palau's Cofa program is scheduled to expire in September, that of the Marshall Islands and Micronesia expired on September 30. Last year, new agreements were established and extended, and Biden promised the three nations US$7.1 billion<\/a> spread over 20 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China's Lobbying Offensive<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although it seemed that there was considerable bipartisan support for the new conditions, Congress<\/a> still needs to approve the promised funding. U.S. senators have been at odds over federal spending for months. The three claimed that their nations had successfully increased US defenses over a region \"larger than the 48 contiguous United States, stretching from west of Hawaii to the Philippines<\/a> and Indonesia\" in a letter dated February 6 to several Senate leaders. The message went on to say that Washington has early-warning radar equipment and missile bases in Palau.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It referred to a facility in the Marshall Islands that was described as the world's best range for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles<\/a> and conducting military space operations by the former chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. A selfless swim in the inner lagoon of Palau. Palau, which is well-known for its rich marine life, has experienced economic hardship recently due to the coronavirus outbreak and a decline in Chinese visitors. Image courtesy of Shutterstock. The letter also said that the US was able to do military<\/a> drills in Micronesia because of the Cofa agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Stakes for US-Pacific Relations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Pacific leaders acknowledged that there was a reasonable delay in funding, but they said that \"it has generated uncertainty among our peoples.\" They alluded to public unease and Beijing's lobbying in the area when they said, \"As much [as] they identify with and appreciate the United States<\/a>, which formerly governed our islands, this has resulted in undesirable opportunities for economic exploitation by competitive political actors active in the Pacific.\"\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roughly 40% of Micronesia's yearly revenue comes from US subsidies, which have a significant impact on the economy of the three island republics. About 70% of the Marshall Islands' GDP is financed by the US. Since China ceased sending visitors to Palau in 2018 due to the latter's recognition of Taiwan<\/a>, which Beijing views as a part of China that should be rejoined by force if necessary, the island nation has experienced economic hardship. A price was paid for the coronavirus epidemic as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Taiwan is recognized as an independent state by the majority of nations, including the US, but Washington<\/a> is determined to arm the self-governing island and opposes any effort at invasion. Palau is unable to move. Palau may have to borrow money and make budget cuts, including to pensions, if the funding isn't approved swiftly. This would make the island nation even more susceptible to external influence and internal unrest, according to Cleo Paskal of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a Washington think tank, in a recent opinion piece. According to Charles Edel and Kathryn Paik of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a different Washington think tank<\/a>, the US was in danger of making a major strategic error if it stops funding a little-known but crucially important agreement. They made this statement in a separate article published last month.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Navigating The Pacific: US Persistently Pursues Delayed Funds Amidst China's Lobbying Push","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"navigating-the-pacific-us-persistently-pursues-delayed-funds-amidst-chinas-lobbying-push","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_modified_gmt":"2025-02-02 08:34:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/dctransparency.com\/?p=6871","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":true,"total_page":19},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"epic_block_3"};

Page 19 of 21 1 18 19 20 21