Trump’s environmental lobby: Reversing climate policies in 2025

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
American environmental lobbying under Trump’s administration
Credit: envirotech-online.com

President Donald Trump made some important decisions in many executive orders that have an impact on the environment and climate of the planet. Even if many of Trump’s actions are expected to be challenged in court. He is rapidly undoing ‌climate change measures that former President Joe Biden made a defining feature of his administration. The changes still exist, at least for the time being, in American environmental lobbying. As the Earth continues to warm, Trump’s actions have been to distance himself from international climate action. He increases domestic oil and gas production and eliminates incentives for electric vehicles, which is concerning. 

According to climate experts, the warmest year on record, 2024, is causing extreme weather that affects millions of people. These orders will make the air dirtier, people sicker, energy more expensive, and ‌communities less prepared for extreme weather.

Why was Trump ordered to leave the historic Paris climate deal?

On Monday, Jan 27, 2025, Trump issued an executive order ordering the US to once more leave the historic Paris climate deal. This deal aimed to promote international collaboration on climate change. Participating nations are required by the agreement to provide nationally determined contributions to the endeavor to reduce greenhouse gas emissions that cause global warming. Trump’s action implies that the federal government will not be making any financial obligations to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. It is not attempting to reach emissions reduction targets. 

Ani Dasgupta, president and CEO of the World Resources Institute, stated that abandoning the Paris Agreement won’t shield Americans lobbying from the effects of climate change. It will give China and the EU a competitive advantage in the rapidly expanding clean energy sector and reduce employment opportunities for American workers.

Trump’s energy emergency order

With a vow to “drill, baby, drill,” Trump issued an executive order declaring an energy emergency. The Defense Production Act permits the government to use private property and resources to manufacture items deemed to be a national need. The federal use of eminent domain is one of the ways the order promotes the spread of oil and gas. Experts contest his claim that the order was based on an “inadequate energy supply.”

In actuality, the US has an ample supply of energy in all forms. The action is primarily intended to lower gas costs. It’s crucial to remember that the United States currently produces more oil than any other country in history. America reached that point during the Biden administration, “not necessarily as a result of the Biden administration’s policies, but rather of policies that have been in place for forty years.” 

Next steps for action

The Endangered Species Act cannot be a barrier to energy production, according to one part of the proclamation announcing an energy emergency. This act will weaken the Endangered Species Act and hasten the decline and possible extinction of many endangered species, including whales and sea turtles. This has been a barrier to the development of fossil fuels in the United States for decades. Additionally, Trump has permitted drilling in parts of the pristine Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. As part of a protracted process hampered by legal issues and exacerbated by political conflicts, Biden had previously both prohibited and authorized drilling in other Arctic regions.

“If a statute requires the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to regulate pollution to protect the health of the most vulnerable members of the public, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) can still insist that EPA adopt a standard that protects fewer people and costs industry less,” reads one early description of EPA during the Reagan administration.

Reagan’s EPA appointees oversaw previously unheard-of layoffs; several had experience in regulated businesses. Seventy-eight percent fewer civil cases were referred to the courts as a result of these reductions, which included the dismissal of over a quarter of its employees and a 21% budget cut by the US Congress.

These improvements were mostly undone in the decades following Reagan’s departure, during both Democratic and Republican governments, until the first term of President Donald J. Trump in 2016. With its budget cuts, layoffs, an abdication of federal responsibility, and a drastic reduction in enforcement, Trump’s EPA operated similarly to Reagan’s. As head of the executive branch of government, the US President is ultimately responsible for enforcing all laws. 

Research Staff

Research Staff

Sign up for our Newsletter